design and engineering-risks
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
1/101
RELIABLE ELEMENTS OF
DESIGN
Dr. Shouri P.V.
Associate Prof. in Mechanical Enineerin!
Mo"el Enineerin #ollee!
Thr$$a$ara! #ochin % &'( )(*! +erala.
E,-ail /0shouri1-ec.ac.in
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
2/101
Design Process
Design process is a collection ofprocedures and habits that help teams
design better products
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
3/101
Design - Then and Now
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
4/101
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
5/101
How dose CE Reduce Time?
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
6/101
What Do the End UsersWant?
Performance& Functionality Aordability
Ease of useincluding ergonomics Reliabilityand Long life- Safety
Lo maintenanceand easy assembly Aesthetics
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
7/101
!his amusing picture" of an anti-drugpropaganda pencil hose message is sub#ertedsimply by sharpening it$ !he truth is strangerthan some of the %ctions that accompany it itas sent to schools and recalled only after achild noticed the problem$ 'From a ())* +e
,or !imes report.
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
8/101
Aging is a /ery 0eneral Phenomenon1
According to Reliability !heory
Aging is +2! 3ust groing old4nstead
Aging is a degradation to failurebecoming sic" frail and dead
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
9/101
Product Design
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
10/101
Design for Whom?
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
11/101
4s the 5ustomer Satis%ed6
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
12/101
Ultimate Goal of aDesigner
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
13/101
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
14/101
Design - An 4terati#eProcess
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
15/101
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
16/101
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
17/101
4s Product Design a5ompromise6
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
18/101
ia!ilit"# $easi!ilit"#Desira!ilit"
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
19/101
%rea&-E'en (nal"sis
Some managerial 7uestions
8o much should e produce to brea
e#en6For a speci%c #olume" should e
manufacture the product oursel#es" or
outsource6For machine alternati#es A and 9" at hat
#olumes should e use machine A and at
hat #olumes" machine 96
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
20/101
%rea&-e'en Chart
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
21/101
Designer# User# Client
At times the user" the client and the customercould be the same or dierent
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
22/101
)*iral of Progress in+ualit"
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
23/101
$actors (,ecting Product+ualit"
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
24/101
What is Cost of +ualit"?
4t:s a term that:s idely used ; and idelymisunderstood$
!he uality 5osts
'(. 4nternal Failure 5ost'?.
E@ternal Failure5ost
'. Appraisal 5ost'B. Pre#ention 5ost
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
25/101
*timum +ualit"
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
26/101
$unction# !/ecti'es andConstraints in Design
$unction Chat does component do6
!/ecti'e
Chat is to be ma@imied orminimied6
Constraints
Chat non-negotiable conditionsmust be met6Chat negotiable but desirableconditions $$$6
Stiness and strength might be absolutere7uirements - hard constraints
5ost might be negotiable - a soft constraint
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
27/101
Wh" 'er Design?
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
28/101
How 0an" of These *tionsHa'e 1ou E'er Used?
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
29/101
4n the beginning as you addfeaturesfunctionality there is a good rise inuser e@perience$ 9ut it plateaus 7uicly ith a
sharp degradation$
)ta es of Prod ct life in
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
30/101
)tages of Product life inmar&et
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
31/101
Point of Re-in'ention
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
32/101
2ife C"cle E3tensions
Life 5ycle e@tensions can be achie#ed byaltering
the mareting mi@
(.Product
?.Price
.PromotionB.5hannels of Distribution
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
33/101
Companies want their products to enjoy a long life
cycle
Altering the mareting mi@ can e@tend theproduct life cycle
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
34/101
+ot all products follo the con#entionalproduct life cycle
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
35/101
Apples designs ha#e consistently made
other destops loo bland and boring
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
36/101
5oca-5ola contour bottle is a masterpiece in
industrial design that dates bac to ()(G
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
37/101
5oncei#ed in ()? by 0eorge 5arardine" a cardesigner ho as oring on #ehiclesuspension systems at the time
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
38/101
Designed by Phillipe Starc in ())I" the JuicySalif is e@hibited in the Kuseum of Kodern Artin +e ,or - the design is based on the shapeof a s7uid$
Cash $low 4n'ol'ed at arious
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
39/101
Cash $low 4n'ol'ed at arious
)tages
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
40/101
Generali5ed 2ife C"cleDiagram
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
41/101
Cost of Design
5ost of design is relati#ely lo for a product$8oe#er design is signi%cantly responsible forthe cost of its realiation
A good design alays brings don the cost8ence a good design should focus on costaspects of the product beyond its function andstrength
!his should be taen care of during e#ery phaseof design
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
42/101
Cost of Change
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
43/101
E,ort 6 Cost
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
44/101
2n an a#erage" it taes about ( 9illionand (I years to bring a ne drug tomaret
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
45/101
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
46/101
Concurrent s7 Traditional
Engineering
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
47/101
Reliability De%ned
Relia!ilit" is 89ualit" changing o'ertime:
As time tends to infnity reliability tends tozero.
Reliability terminates ith a failure ; that is"unreliability occurs$
Elements of Reliability'(. Probability
'?. Function
'. Coring 5onditions
Need for $ool-Proof )"stem
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
48/101
Need for $ool Proof )"stemDesign
8umans err continuallyM it is an intrinsicpart of our nature$ System design shouldtae this into account$
!he system should be designed so that asingle act by a single person could cause
not cause calamity$
Emergence of Relia!ilit"
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
49/101
Emergence of Relia!ilit"Engineering
!he %rst recorded usage of the ordreliability dates bac to the (*IIs" andas referred to a person and not atechnical system
!he ord reliability as %rst coined bythe English poet Samuel !$ 5oleridge" ho
along ith Cilliam Cordsorth startedthe English romantic mo#ement$
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
50/101
These lines Coleridge was writing in the year
1816, in praise of his friend the poet Robert
Southey
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
51/101
!he triode in#ented by Lee de Forest in ()IN"hich at the onset of Corld Car 44 initiated the
electronic re#olution" enabling a series ofapplications such as the radio" tele#ision" radarand others7
During Corld Car 44" airborne radios deli#eredinto remote locations of ar had appallingreliability of only about (O$
Car eorts also produced a ne eapon ofterror - the /-( rocet$ !he /-( rocet had ademonstrated reliability of ( success out of ((
attempts for a calculated reliability of )$
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
52/101
The V-2 rocket is a result of Werner Von Braunsredesign of V-1 rocket using the principles ofredundancy to enhance the rockets reliability.
!he /-? results are ritten in the historyboos for a demonstrated reliability
impro#ement program that resulted in thebuilding of more than *"III /-? rocet motorsof hich N"II ere %red$
5ompare the /-? 7uantities to only BB S5QDmissiles %red during the 0ulf ar and mostpeople today still remember terror falling fromthe sies #ia 5++ broadcasts$
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
53/101
V1 V2 S!"
The V-1 was first launched in the summer of 1!!,and o"er the ne#t se"eral months thousands of the
missiles were directed toward $ondon% &s they flew,
the engines made a distincti"e sound, leading the
'nglish to call them (bu)) bombs%*
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
54/101
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
55/101
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
56/101
!he orean Car as a ar of hightechnology $
8oe#er" studies shoed ? of maintenancecosts for e#ery ( of capital costs during theorean Car$ 8igh maintenance costs led toestablishment of reliability re7uirements forrocurement of e ui ment$
!he %rst te@tboos ere ritten for the
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
57/101
!he %rst te@tboos ere ritten for theemerging %eld of reliability during the early()NI:s
During the ()NIs" TOIs" and T*Is applications ofreliability principles ere put to or$
During the mid ())Is" continuous processindustries such as petrochemical and re%ningbegan acti#e" formal" programs to impro#ereliability and decrease costs$
9oos on the sub3ect of reliability engineeringha#e e@ploded in sales #olumes during the
())Is$ !he ne boos are an engineering
Presently the largest number of reliability
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
58/101
Presently" the largest number of reliabilityengineers in the orld is concentrated in theautomoti#e industry$
Some automoti#e companies estimatearranty cost represents ( the cost for ane automobile$ !his cost pressure results inreliability engineers oring to reduce the costof unreliability in the automoti#e industry forone reason - pre#ent loss of money$
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
59/101
Three $aces of Relia!ilit"
We see Reliability as three phenomenathat are oten lumped together to orm abathtub curve
T i # e
$
a
ilu
re
%
a
te
& a r l y $ a i l u r e s
o n s t a n t
$ a i l u r e % a t e
' n c r e a s i n g$ a i l u r e
% a t e
The value o bathtub curves lies inunderstanding concepts behind dierent
ailure rates and the medicine reuired
Pro!lem to !e (ddressed
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
60/101
Pro!lem to !e (ddressed!" the Relia!ilit" Engineer
The product starts to wear out as soon as you get
the +uality issues sorted out%not fair to the
customer
Ti#e
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
61/101
4nfant 0ortalit" Rate
!ndia " ## deaths per $%%% live births
&oa and 'anipur " $$
(erala " $)
'adhya *radesh " +,
-. . " /.0
ingapore " ).0
1apan " ).2
3hina " )%.)+
ri 4an5a " $2.+
2ife E3*ectanc"
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
62/101
2ife E3*ectanc"
!ndia " /+.+
(erala 6 7#
'adhya *radesh " +2
.% S% / 08%
Singapore / 81%6
2apan / 8%
China / 03%3Sri $an4a / 0!%0
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
63/101
%asic Relia!ilit" E9uationReliability is a measure of the probability for
failure-free operation and is often e#pressed as
5ey parameters describing reliability are mean
time to failure, mean time betweenbefore repairs,
mean life of components, failure rate and thema#imum number of failures in a specific time-
inter"al%
=
t
dttZ
etR )
23
23
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
64/101
Constant Ha5ard 0odel
7or a component with constant failure rate, the
reliability e+uation reduces to
where 9 is the constant failure rate
:n reality, e"en though this holds good only in-
between the period of infant mortality and wear-out, it is often a reasonably good assumption as
this time frame is e+ual to almost the entire lifetime
of any e+uipment%
tetR =23
ariation of Relia!ilit" with
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
65/101
ariation of Relia!ilit" withTime
(t)
Ti#e
The constant ha)ard model is generally usedfor the calculation of component reliabilities for
a gi"en system%
0T%$ of a Constant Ha5ard
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
66/101
0T%$ of a Constant Ha5ard0odel
The constant failure rate model is widely used in
the literature to reduce the computational burden
of the resulting problem because the parameter
mean time between failure ; becomes time-independent in this case%
*23))
===
dtedttRMTBF t
C t R li !ilit C l l ti
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
67/101
Com*onent Relia!ilit" Calculation
* particular co#ponent has an of +TT$ of ,hours. onsidering a unifor# failure rate /hat is
co#ponent reliability for 2 hours0
4)))
*
=;per hour>
t 2 hours
robability of failure 1-.343 .5321 ;or>5.3216
;or>34.73?5&)65.)2())3())
4)))*
==
eR
Elements of )"stem Design
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
68/101
Elements of )"stem Design
Characteristics of Product ;
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
69/101
;)"stem Design
( 5omponents----------------------Subsystems? 4nterrelated components
9oundary
B PurposeG En#ironment
N 4nterfaces
O 4nput* 2utput
) 5onstraints
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
70/101
)"stem Relia!ilit"
.23232323 7(* etctRtRtRtR ComponentComponentComponent =
Reliability of a process or system may be theproduct of many different reliability terms, such
as
@ith the increase of number of essential
components in the system, the system reliability
will decrease and to achie"e high systemreliability component reliability "alues should be
"ery high%
The Conce*t of Relia!ilit"
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
71/101
* ")tructure
The logical arrangement of components that areimportant for system reliability is called Reliability
=loc4 Aiagram ;R=A>% The systems can be made
up of either
*) Series
() Barallel, or
7)
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
72/101
)eries Con
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
73/101
Parallel Con
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
74/101
0i3ed Con
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
75/101
g "Con
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
76/101
Human %od"Vital rgansare connected
in series
Cells in "ital
organs areconnected in
parallel
Relia!ilit" 4ncreasing
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
77/101
Relia!ilit" 4ncreasingTechni9ues
ne way of achie"ing high reliabilities is by
introducing redundant parts% 7or e#ample we may
ha"e two parts in parallel such that the system
operates if at least one part operates%
R(t) 1-(1-.3,)(1-.3,) .337,
R(t) .3,
=y adding a redundant part we ha"e increased the
reliability of system at time t from D%E to D%0E
Hot )tand-!" s7 Cold )tand-!
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
78/101
!"@e ha"e been assuming that both parts are
operating whene"er the system is on this is some
times called hot standby and is not always
practical%
@e may need to pro"ide a cold stand by where thesecond part is switched into ser"ice when the first
one fails% Then we must also ta4e into account the
reliability of the switch%
:f the switching de"ice is ha"ing reliability D%8 attime t we ha"e the system reliability at time t as
R(t) .3, 8 (.,)(.39)(.3,) .3344
Relia!ilit" *timi5ation
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
79/101
Relia!ilit" *timi5ation
:t is usually necessary to perform trade-off
calculations to determine the ad"isability ofparallel redundancy "ersus impro"ement of the
reliability of the basic subsystem by other means%
2aunches
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
80/101
2aunches
!SS%-512 successful 2: failed 35.76 success rate
!S* - 1:,7 successful 1,5 failed 3.,6 success rate
&! - 22: successful 17 failed 32.76 success rate
hina - 133 successful 17 failed 32.16 success rate
;apan - 95 successful 1: failed 9,.46 success rate
'ndia - 55 successful 1 failed 74.16 success rate
Source: Claude $afleurFs Spacecraft 'ncyclopedia,21,
0inimi5e the Num!er of ital
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
81/101
0inimi5e the Num!er of italCom*onents
8ecrease the number o component parts or asystem and believe in the vital e9. :or asystem that contains + items connected in
series the system reliability is ;
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
82/101
Com*licated Designs Tendto Decrease Relia!ilit"
%est Desisgn is the )im*le
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
83/101
%est Desisgn is the )im*leDesign
& designer 4nows he has arri"ed at perfection not
when there is no longer anything to add, but when
there is no longer anything to ta4e away%
-- &ntoine de Saint-'#upery
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost
simplicity% :t is a price which the "ery rich find "ery
hard to pay%-- Sir &ntony Goare
Parts Derating
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
84/101
Parts DeratingQse derating to assure that stressesapplied to the parts are loer than the
stresses theparts can normally ithstand$
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
85/101
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
86/101
0enerally failures occur if Load e>ceeds
Strength
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
87/101
ther Relia!ilit"
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
88/101
ther Relia!ilit"4m*ro'ement 0ethods
Re#ie the selection of any parts that arerelati#ely ne and unpro#en$
Qse standard parts$
5ontrol the operating en#ironment to pro#ideconditions that yield loer failure rates$
Specify replacement schedules to remo#e andreplace lo-reliability parts before they reach
the ear-out stage$
ther Relia!ilit" 4m*ro'ement0ethods
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
89/101
0ethodsPrescribe screening tests to detect infant-
mortality failures and to eliminatesubstandard components$
5onduct research and de#elopment to attainan impro#ement in the basic reliability ofthose components hich contribute most ofthe unreliability$
(utomoti'e Relia!ilit"
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
90/101
(utomoti'e Relia!ilit"
The proportion of electronic components used in
motor "ehicles has been increasing steeply inrecent years% :n fact, many industry obser"ers
e#pect electronic components to account for !D?
of total car production costs in the near future%
Gowe"er there is a concern that the life of the
electronic components is relati"ely low thereby
affecting reliability%
Ae"elopment of highly reliable, large-scale
software programs for microcomputer control has
become a crucial matter for the automa4ers%
Need for
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
91/101
A story tells of 8enry Ford:s buying scrapped
Ford cars and ha#ing his engineersdisassemble them to see hich parts failedand hich ere still in good shape$ Engineersassumed this as done to %nd the ea parts
and mae them stronger$
Ford e@plained that he anted to %nd the
parts that ere still in good shape$ !hecompany could sa#e money if they redesignedthese parts to fail at the same time as theothers$
Need for)"nchroni5ation
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
92/101
('aila!ilit"
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
93/101
"&"ailability is the ratio of time a system or
component is functional to the total time it isre+uired or e#pected to function%
MTTRMTBF
MTBFtyAvailabili
+
=
Relia!ilit" and )afet"
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
94/101
Relia!ilit" and )afet"
Design for = tools
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
95/101
gDesign for Kanufacture andAssembly
Design for Reliability
Design for Kaintainability
Design for Ser#iceability
Design for the En#ironment
Conce*t of Energ"
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
96/101
* g"Producti'it"
*roductivity ?Inputs
Outputs
@nergy *roductivityH
tEnergyInpu
Outputs
0inimi5ing Energ"Consum*tion at the Cost of
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
97/101
Consum*tion at the Cost ofRelia!ilit" ?
oog e s e un anc"(**roach Towards
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
98/101
(**roach TowardsRelia!ilit"
& ser"er room in Council =luffs, $owa
( 0easure of Google>s Energ"Consum*tion
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
99/101
Consum*tionIoogle used %3 billion 4ilowatt-hours of electricity
last year, about the same as what DD,DDD .%S%homes would use in a year / that is e+ui"alent to
one +uarter of the output of a nuclear power plant -
the Jew Kor4 Times reports%
ne Ioogle search is e+ual to turning on a 6D@
light bulb for 10 seconds%
7or e"ery 4ilowatt-hour used for computing in a
typical data center, nearly a whole additional
4ilowatt-hour is used for running cooling systems%
Considera!le Energ" Used for Cooling)"stems
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
100/101
)"s e s
& central cooling plant in IoogleLs Aouglas County, Ieorgia, data center
(fter all Relia!ilit" is a Pro!a!ilit"
-
7/25/2019 Design and Engineering-Risks
101/101
Th k