design and analysis of sierpinski gasket fractal antenna
DESCRIPTION
Journal of Telecommunications, ISSN 2042-8839, Volume 13, Issue 1, March 2012 http://www.journaloftelecommunications.co.ukTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Design and Analysis of Sierpinski Gasket Fractal Antenna](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020122/544f4272b1af9f2f638b56ab/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
JOURNAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, VOLUME, 13, ISSUE 1, MARCH 2012
30
© 2012 JOT www.journaloftelecommunications.co.uk
Design and Analysis of Sierpinski Gasket Fractal Antenna
Praveen Tiwari
1, Rajneesh Chawhan
2, Dr. R. P. Agarwal
3, Sanjay Sharma
4
1M.Tech Student (Design & Analysis of Fractal Antenna’s, Shobhit University, Meerut)
1
IIMT Engineering College, Meerut,
2Meerut Institute of Engineering & Tech.,Meerut.
3 Shobhit University, Meerut
1, 3, 4 Shobhit University, Meerut
Abstract-- The progress in wireless communication systems and increasing of a variety wireless applications have
remarkably increase the demand of multiband/wideband antennas with smaller dimensions than conventionally possible. This wider bandwidth and low profile antennas are in great demand for both commercial and military applications. This has initiated antenna research in various directions; one of which is by using fractal shaped antenna elements. Traditionally, each antenna operates at a single or dual frequency bands, where different antenna is needed for different applications. This cause a limited space and place problem.There are an important relation between antenna dimension and wavelength. This relation states if antenna size less than half of wave length, than antenna is not an efficient radiator because the radiation resistance, gain and bandwidth are deteriorated. The entire fractal antenna family shows multiband in resonant frequencies.
Index Terms— fractal antenna, Multiband, iterative method, IE3D.
————— ————— ——————————
I. INTRODUCTION
The Sierpinski Gasket antenna also known as Sierpinski
Triangle was described by Waclaw Sierpinski in 1915
and it become an important sample of fractal set. The
objective of this paper is to be design Sierpinski gasket
fractal antenna. The behaviors of this antenna are
investigate such as return loss, number of iteration and
simulation have been done. The design of Sierpinski
antenna starts with an equilateral triangle with
operating frequency 1GHz and analysis take place
between 0.5 GHz to 3 GHz at various iteration.
II. ANTENNA CONFIGURATION
The antenna was feed with transmission line feeding
technique. The iteration process is done up to second iteration.
The antenna is simulated using glass-epoxy material with
relative permittivity, r = 4.4, substrate thickness, d = 1.6mm
where the radiating element is the cooper clad.
Stage 0
Stage 1
Stage 2
Fig. 1 The stages of iteration of Sierpinski Gasket Fractal antenna.
The design of the antenna was start with single
element using basic square patch Microstrip antenna. The operating frequency is at 1.0GHz. Side length of the equilateral triangle can be calculated by (1) and (2).
![Page 2: Design and Analysis of Sierpinski Gasket Fractal Antenna](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020122/544f4272b1af9f2f638b56ab/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
JOURNAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, VOLUME, 13, ISSUE 1, MARCH 2012
31
© 2012 JOT www.journaloftelecommunications.co.uk
a = (2 c)/( 3* f * √Εr ) ……………………….1
a(eff) = a [1 + 2.199 (h / a) - 12.853 (h / (a √Er))
+16.436 (h /(aEr)) + 6.182 (h/a)²- 9.802 ( 1 / √Er) (h / a)²]
………………………………………………………..……2.
Here
c = velocity of light in free space. f = resonant frequency. h = height of the substrate. Εr= dielectric constant of the substrate.
Thus an equilateral triangle with side a(eff) is the base shape as shown by stage (0) in figure 1.
III. RESULT AND DISSCUSSION
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Frequency(GHz)
Re
turn
Lo
ss
(dB
)
Fig. 2 Variation of return loss with frequency for base shape.
Table 1 Frequencies at which minimum return loss occur for
base shape.
Frequency(Simulated) 1.0 GHz
ReturnLoss(Simulated) -18.01 dB
Frequency(Measured) 0.98 GHz
ReturnLoss(Measured) -19.8 dB
Fig. 3 Radiation pattern at f =1.0GHz
(a) E-total, phi = 0(deg)
(b) E-total, phi = 90(deg
In fig2: the return loss -18.01 dB with frequency 1.0GHz was
obtained from simulation. The measurement response
frequency has shifted to 0.98 GHz with measured return loss
-19.8 dB.
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Frequency(GHz)
Retu
rn L
oss(d
B)
Fig. 4 Variation of return loss with frequency for first iteration.
![Page 3: Design and Analysis of Sierpinski Gasket Fractal Antenna](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020122/544f4272b1af9f2f638b56ab/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
JOURNAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, VOLUME, 13, ISSUE 1, MARCH 2012
32
© 2012 JOT www.journaloftelecommunications.co.uk
Table 2 Frequencies at which minimum return loss occur for first
iteration
Frequency(Simulated) 0.64 GHz 2.27 GHz
Return loss(Simulated) -11.07 dB -15.23dB
Frequency(Measured) 0.68 GHz 2.32 GHz
Return loss(Measured) -10.01 dB -20.04 dB
(a)
(b)
Fig. 5 Radiation pattern at f =0.64GHz
(a) E-total, phi = 0(deg)
(b) E-total, phi = 90(deg
(a)
(b)
Fig. 6 Radiation pattern at f =2.27 GHz
(a) E-total, phi = 0(deg)
(b) E-total, phi = 90(deg)
Figure 4 shows the result of return loss for first iteration. The
resonant frequency was found at 0.64GHz and 2.27GHz from
simulation. Measurement response frequencies have shifted at
0.68 GHz and 2.32 GHz. The best return loss -20.04dB
(2.32GHz) was found.
![Page 4: Design and Analysis of Sierpinski Gasket Fractal Antenna](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020122/544f4272b1af9f2f638b56ab/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
JOURNAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, VOLUME, 13, ISSUE 1, MARCH 2012
33
© 2012 JOT www.journaloftelecommunications.co.uk
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Frequency(GHz)
Re
turn
Lo
ss
(dB
)
Fig. 7 Variation of return loss with frequency for second iteration.
Table 3 Frequencies at which minimum return loss occur for
second iteration
Frequency(Simulated) 0.74GHz 1.47GHz 1.99GHz
Return loss(Simulated) -10.47dB -18.90 dB -11.90 dB
Frequency(Measured) 0.78 GHz 1.58 GHz 2.15 GHz
Return loss(Measured) -10.01 dB -19.2dB -18.3 dB
(a)
(b)
Fig. 8 Radiation pattern at f =0.74GHz
(a) E-total, phi = 0(deg)
(b) E-total, phi = 90(deg)
(a)
(b)
Fig. 9 Radiation pattern at f =1.47GHz
(a) E-total, phi = 0(deg)
(b) E-total, phi = 90(deg)
![Page 5: Design and Analysis of Sierpinski Gasket Fractal Antenna](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020122/544f4272b1af9f2f638b56ab/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
JOURNAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, VOLUME, 13, ISSUE 1, MARCH 2012
34
© 2012 JOT www.journaloftelecommunications.co.uk
(a)
(b)
Fig. 10 Radiation pattern at f =1.99GHz
(a) E-total, phi = 0(deg)
(b) E-total, phi = 90(deg)
Second iteration fig7 shows that three frequencies responses
existed at 0.74GHz, 1.47GHz and 1.99GHz. There were all
frequencies response obtained from measurement. The best
return loss at 1.47 GHz (-18.90 dB)for simulation as well as for
Measurement.
IV CONCLUSION
The antenna has been design, simulated and fabricated. The
multiband frequencies appeared after applied fractal
technique. It is observed that as the number of iterations is
increased, number of frequency bands also increases. For zero
iteration one band occur, for first iteration two bands occur
and for second iteration three bands occur. The antenna can be
used for GPS, WLAN applications.
V REFERENCES [1] Constantine A. Balanis, “Antenna Theory”, Second Edition,
John Wiley & Son , 2000.
[2] Baliarda, C.P.; Borau, M.N.; Robert, J.R.,” An Iterative model for
Fractal antennas; application to the Sierpinski gasket antenna”, Antennas and
Propagation, IEEE Transactions on vol.48, Issue 5, May 2000, pp.713-719.
.[3] David M.Pozar, “Microstrip Antenna”, IEEE Transaction on
Antenna and Propagation, January1992.
[4] M.K. A. Rahim, N. Abdullah, and M.Z. A. Abdul Aziz, “Micro Strip
Sierpinski Carpet Antenna Design” IEEE Transaction on Antenna and
propagation,December 2005.
[5] John Gianvittorio, “Fractal antennas: Design, Characterization, and
Application”, Master Thesis, University of California, 2000.
[6] B.B. Mandelbrot, “The Fractal Geometry of nature”, New York,
W.H. Freeman, 1983.
[7] Douglas H. Werner and Suman Ganguly.” An Overview of Fractal
Engineering Research” , IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society, vol.45,
no.1, pp.38-57, Feb 2003.
Praveen Tiwari Student of M.Tech
(Communication Engineering) from Shobhit university Meerut and
presently working in IIMT engineering college, Meerut.
Rajneesh Chawhan B.E. (Electronics) in 1997,
M.Tech.(Digital Communication) in 2010 from U.P.T.U. & presently
working as a Assistant Professor in Meerut Institute of Engineering &
Technology, Meerut (India) affiliated by UPTU, Lucknow. Area of research
interest includes Antenna Designing, Microwave component designing, and
written one book on Switching Theory with ISBN 81-88476-29-X published
by JPNP’s. Meerut. He has published two Research papers in International
Journals and two research papers in national Conference Proceedings.
![Page 6: Design and Analysis of Sierpinski Gasket Fractal Antenna](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020122/544f4272b1af9f2f638b56ab/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
JOURNAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, VOLUME, 13, ISSUE 1, MARCH 2012
35
© 2012 JOT www.journaloftelecommunications.co.uk
Prof. R.P. Agarwal obtained his B.E. (Hons.) in
Electronics &Telecommunication from Govt. Engineering College at Jabalpur
University and M.E. from College of Engineering at Pune University in 1967
and 1970 respectively.He is Former Vice-Chancellor of Sagar University &
Bundelkhand University, Jhansi He started his academic career as Lecturer in
University of Roorkee in August 1970. He was awarded Commonwealth
Scholarship for pursuing higher studies in 1970. He was awarded Ph. D. in
1977 by the University of Newcastle upon Tyne, England.
Prof. Agarwal has rich varied experience of teaching, research, development
and administration. He was appointed as an Indian Expert at Military
Technical College, Baghdad, Iraq during 1981-84. He has coordinated
number of human resources testing and development projects for Public
Sector Undertakings, Govt. organizations and Technical Institutes. He is a
senior member of IEEE (USA), Fellow of IE (I), IETE and Life Member of
ISTE. He was the Vice President of IEEE-UP, Professor & Staff Advisor of
ISTE Students Chapter, Chairman ISTE UP Section, Associated Dean
(Acad.), Chairman, AIMCET-2004, Chairman GATE-2005 and Dean
(Acad.). Prof. Agarwal has contributed significantly in the area of scientific
and technical research and development. He has 102 technical papers to his
credit which have been published in national and international journals of
repute and conferences. He has authored 2 books and edited 5 proceedings of
National Seminar. He has handled 10 Consultancy and sponsored research
projects as Principal Investigator. He has guided 6 Ph.D. scholars and is
currently guiding another 3 Ph.D. thesis. Prof. Agarwal has traveled
extensively to USA, UK, Europe, Middle East, Austria, Hungary, Finland,
Denmark and Sweden to deliver lectures and attend conferences, symposia
and meetings.
Sanjay Kumar Sharma was born in India on July 25, 1970. He
received his B.Sc. degree from Agra University in 1988 He received
his Diploma in Electronics Engineering from Board of
Technical Education, Lucknow with Hons. in the year 1992,
Bachelor Degree in Electronics and Communication
Engineering from Delhi College of Engineering, Delhi(Presently Delhi
Technological University) (India), in 2000 and M. E. in Electronics &
Communication Engineering from Punjab University, Chandigarh in the
year 2010. Presently he is working as Assistant Professor in Shobhit
University Meerut. His area of interest is Metamaterial based
Antennas and Artificial Neural Networks and its applications
in Electromagnetic. He has published 2 Research papers in
International Journals & 11 research papers in International and
national Conference Proceedings.