dependent arising & doctrine of no-self post
TRANSCRIPT
Class 7
Making merit – basis for much of Buddhist life (in Hinduism and Jainism as well)
Laypeople support monks and nuns with material donations
Monks and nuns provide the Dharma in return (recitation of texts, sermons, spiritual advice)
Dana “giving” most effective form of making merit
Givers – both lay and monastic, attain a better situation in this or a future lifetime
Giving
Observing moral precepts (5, 8, or 10)
Meditating
Showing respect for one’s superiors
Attending to their needs
Transferring merit to others
Rejoicing in the merit of others
Listening to the Dharma
Preaching the Dharma
Having right view (1st of Eightfold Path)
Dharma for laypeople
Similar to Manusmrti “Law of Manu” and other prescriptions for varnasramadharma
Child - parents
Student – teacher
Husband – wife
Gentleman – friends & colleagues
Nobleman – slaves and laborers
Gentleman – sramanas and Brahmins
Who is subject to it?
Hub: “Three Poisons”
greed: the rooster hatred: the snake delusion: the pig
Inner circle: Two orders of conditionality
Ascending Descending
Middle Circle: Six Realms of Existence
Outer Rim: Twelve-fold Chain of Causes and Conditions
Six Realms of Existence
Humans – Most Fortunate Position b/c Awakening is possible
Animals
Hell Dwellers (Cold Hells and Hot Hells)
Pretas (Avaricious Spirits or Hungry Ghosts)
Asuras (Lesser Gods or Demigods)
Gods
Two verses alongside of the Great Demon of Impermanence’s (Yama) head
You should seek renunciation
And apply yourself to the practice of the Buddha’s teaching.
Conquer the army of life and death.
As an elephant smashes a thatched hut.
Within the Law [Dharma] and the Discipline [Vinaya]
Constantly practice – don’t give up,
And you will be able to exhaust the sea of afflictions
And arrive at the point where suffering ends.
An ordinary man (pṛthagjana/puthujjana) dominated by :
1.Desire or greed becomes a hungry ghost, ever discontent and anguished because of not being able to satisfy their desire
2.Dislike or hatred enters into one of the hell realms where one suffers terrible pain
3.Delusion or ignorance becomes an animal ruled by the instincts of food and reproduction
Buddhist, Jain, and brahminical (Vedic religion or Hindu) sources
Wide variety of views on the nature of the individual and his ultimate destiny
Buddhism seems to be reacting against Upanishadic views on the soul or self The Upanishads are roughly contemporary texts from an early stage of
HinduismR
esult – the doctrine of anātman/anattaT
hree marks of existence – along with dukkha and anitya/anicca ‘impermanence’
The unchanging constant underlying all our various and unstable experiences
This kind of “Self” is
unchanging = unaffected by any specific experience eternal = indestructible independent = not dependent on other phenomena one’ s true identity = what we really are under one’s control! conducive to happiness = beyond suffering
First, one believes that one’s true identity consists of a Self.
Next, one seeks to make that Self happy and free of suffering.
To do so, one mistakenly interprets objects as either causes of happiness or suffering.
One then acts to obtain those objects, even though they cannot do what one feels that they can do.
Problems of personal identity
Everyday terms such as ‘I’ imply an unchanging something that underlies our different experiences
The five aggregates or ‘groups’ (skandha/khandha) of physical and mental events is a descriptive analysis of the nature of individual experience
Answers: What is a being? What is going on? What is there?
1.Upanishads – self as ‘inner controller’, but we have no control over any of the five ‘aggregates’
2.The five ‘aggregates’ are impermanent and therefore duhkha or painful; not free from suffering as in the Upanishads
3.Meaningless of the term ‘self’ apart from individual experiences
Same as experiences – self then no self at all Apart from experiences – apart from experiences, what is there? Self having the attributes of experiences – how to distinguish?
Why does the Buddha refuse to
answer Vacchagotta’s question?
Exhaustive analysis of the individual
The idea of an ‘I’ is elusive, so much so that it might not make any sense at all
constantly changing physical and mental constituents
Psychophysical personality
Simile of the chariot – composed of wheels, axle, yoke, reins, etc.
The Buddha is trying to avoid the extremes of ‘eternalism’ (śaśvata-vāda / sassata-vāda) and ‘annihilation’ (uccheda-vāda)
How? Through the Middle Way
Eternalism – permanently existing soul
Annihilation – our sense of self is an epiphenomenon of physical processes and disappears at death
What role does dualist thought play in
Ananda’s explanation?
1. Form2. Feelings3. Recognitions or discriminations4. Basic self-consciousness5. Volitional ‘forces’ or ‘formations’
Skt., Pāli rūpa
The physical world or material phenomenon
Bodily phenomena
Skt., Pāli vedanā My experience of the sensation of
things produce the following kinds of feelings:
1. Pleasant2. Unpleasant3. Neutral
Skt. samjñā, Pāli saññā Classifying and sorting my experiences
between objects of the six senses (5 + mental images)
Labeling or recognizing
Skt. vijñāna, Pāli viññāṇa
An awareness of ourselves as thinking subjects having a series of perceptions and thoughts based on the six senses
This is the only thing that travels from one birth to the next
Keep in mind it is considerably changed during a birth by experience, habits, and perhaps by religious practices
Skt. samskāra, Pāli saṅkhāra volitional activities (karma, which is
intentional action) as a result of feelings and recognitions or discriminations
all types of mental habits, thoughts, ideas, opinions, compulsions, and decisions triggered by an object
good (desire) bad (dislike) neutral (indifferent)
No permanently existing Self or Soul
But rebirth
Questions: Moral responsibility – without a soul and rebirth, who or
what is responsible? Dharmas – mental events or phenomena that are
irreducible, therefore are ultimate ‘event’ or ‘reality’ that constitutes the basis of reality as a whole (Abhidharma, later)
Sometimes also called dependent origination or interdependent origination
Why? Presented as the ‘middle’ between: ‘eternalism’ – unchanging constant self that
underlies different experiences, something that that endures without change
‘annihilation’ – no real connection between a person in one point in time and another point
Why is Kassapa confused about how suffering arises? What does he think is necessary for
suffering?
How can we still then refer to an ‘I’
Mutual conditionality rather than linear sequence of causal events
The unconditioned – usually only nirvana (and sometimes space)
Continuity of a ‘self’ in a sense, not identity
CAUSAL DEPENDENCE OF THE 12 LINKS (nidānas)
Ignorance – Blind Person
Karma – Potter Molding Clay (result of ignorance)
Consciousness – Monkey Looking From One Object to the Next
Name and Form – Oarsman Steering Boat Down the River
Six Senses or Sources – House with Windows (5 senses + Mental Perceptions)
Contact – Sexual Embrace
Feeling – Arrow in the Eye
Craving or Grasping – Woman Offering Drink to a Man
Attachment – Grasping for the Fruit of Previous Desires
Existence – New Bride
Birth – Woman Giving birth
Aging and Death – Corpse Swathed in Cloth and in Fetal Position
PAST LIFEI
gnorance -> leads to karmaK
arma – volitional actions with karmic resultsTHIS LIFE
Consciousness – from previous life
Mind & Body (Name & Form) – into a new body with the other 3 aggregates
Six Senses or Sources – caused by mind & body
Contact – caused by six senses
Feeling – caused by contact
Craving or Grasping – caused by pleasant or unpleasant feelings
Attachment – caused by craving
Existence or Becoming – of karma, good and bad intentions which explain future lives
NEXT LIFEB
irthA
ging and Death
Old Age & Death ←
[re]Birth ←
Becoming (desire for continued existence) ←
Grasping ←
Craving ←
Feeling ←
Contact ←
Six Sensory Faculties ←
Name & Form ←
Consciousness ←
Predispositions (karma formations) ←
Ignorance
1. Ignorance
2. Predispositions
3. Consciousness
4 “Name-and-Form”
5. Six sensory faculties
6. Contact
7. Feeling
8. Craving
9.Grasping
10. Becoming
11. (re)-Birth
12. Old Age & Death
Of those dharmas which arise from a cause,
the Tathāgata has stated the cause, and also the
cessation; such is the teaching of the Great Ascetic.Aśvajit tells Śāriputra
Encapsulates the Buddha’s teaching in one verse
Whoever sees dependent arising, sees the Buddha
Later used as in inscriptions and to animate or consecrate ritual objects such as stūpas or images
Four Noble Truths in summaryFour Noble Truths in summary
This existing, that exists; this arising, that arises; this not existing, that does not
exist; this ceasing, that ceases.
1)Continuity and identity in the process of change and denies the view of ‘annihilationism’ (misunderstand, ‘eternalism’)
2)By indicating how various phenomena condition each other, Dependent Arising shows that there is difference and diversity in the process of something changing, denying the view of ‘eternalism’ (misunderstand, annihilationism’)
3)Actions are to be understood as not the work of an autonomous self but the outcome of the complex interaction of diverse impersonal conditions, denying a view of selfhood (misunderstand, actions are not real & have no moral consequences)
4)Appropriate consequences follow from specific causes, both view that actions are not real and causality is not real are abandoned (misunderstand, can lead to views of determinism and causality is unreal)