department of economics eco 204 microeconomic theory ......eco 204, 2012 - 2013, test 2 this test is...
TRANSCRIPT
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 1 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
Department of Economics ● ECO 204 ● Microeconomic Theory for Commerce ● 2012 – 2013 ● Ajaz Hussain
Test 2 Solutions
IMPORTANT NOTES:
Proceed with this exam only after the go-ahead from the Instructor or the proctor
Do not leave during the first hour of the exam or the last 15 minutes of the exam
You are not allowed to leave the exam room unattended. If you need to go to the washroom, raise your hand and a proctor
will accompany you to the washroom. You are allowed to go to the washroom ONLY.
You are required to stop writing and turn your exam face down when asked to stop by the instructor or proctor at the end of
the exam
Please note that proctors will take down your name for academic offenses, which will be treated in accordance with the policies as
published by the Faculty of Arts and Sciences
Exam details:
Duration: 1 hour and 50 minutes
Total number of questions: 4
Total number of pages: 26
Total number of points: 100
Please answer all questions. To earn credit you must show all calculations. Please see last page of this exam for the allocation of points
across questions.
Exam aids:
This is a closed note and closed book exam.
You may use a non-programmable calculator. Sharing is not allowed.
University of Toronto Academic Code of Conduct:
The University’s Code of Behavior on Academic Matters (“Code”) applies to all Rotman Commerce students. The Code prohibits all forms of
academic dishonesty including, but not limited to, cheating, plagiarism, working on the exam after the proctor has announced the exam
has ended and the use of unauthorized aids. Students violating the Code may be subject to penalties up to and including suspension or
expulsion from the University.
By signing my name and entering my name and student number, I am confirming that I have read and understand the University’s Code of
Behavior on Academic Matters. I will conduct myself with the utmost integrity and I will neither give nor receive unauthorized aid in tests or
examinations.
Signature:
Last Name: First Name:
9-Digit Student ID #:
Please circle the section
in which you are
registered
(NOT the section you
attend):
L0101 MON 1 – 3
L0201 TUE 11 – 1
L0301 TUE 2 – 4
L5101 WED 6 – 8
EXAMS WITHOUT SIGNATURES, ID # AND NAMES WILL NOT BE GRADED.
http://www.economics.utoronto.ca/index.php/index/index/homehttp://www.economics.utoronto.ca/ahussain/http://www.utoronto.ca/
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 2 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
Question 1 [25 POINTS]
Consider an agent in an economy with a single good (corn) and where all agents live for exactly two periods At
the beginning of each period, the agent is endowed with “real” incomes and (in units of corn). Let and
denote the amounts of corn consumed in and respectively. Assume that the inter-temporal consumption
set is {( ) }
At agents can save or borrow corn at the real interest rate . Agents do not save to bequeath savings to
future generations because in this economy there’s no romance and no possibility of amorous encounters between
agents – as such, agents do not have children.
(1.1) [3 POINTS] Suppose an agent tells you that she must consume positive amounts of corn in both periods and that she
perceives and as “imperfect substitutes” with diminishing marginal rate of substitution. Write down the equation
of a utility function that represents this agent’s preferences and show why this utility function represents the agent’s
preferences. Show all calculations and state all assumptions.
Answer
We can represent the agent’s preferences over inter-temporal consumption by the Cobb-Douglas utility function:
Where are positive parameters. Notice that the for we must have and which means she must
consume corn in each period. The marginal rate of substitution (slope of indifference curves) is:
As we see that | | (i.e. diminishing marginal rate of substitution).
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 3 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
(1.2) [7 POINTS] State and solve this agent’s inter-temporal Utility Maximization Problem (UMP) with a real (Future
Value) inter-temporal budget constraint. To earn credit you must use the appropriate constrained optimization method,
solve for all variables, and interpret any “Lagrange multipliers”. Show all calculations. Hint: If applicable, use a
convenient positive monotonic transformation of the utility function in part (1.1).
Answer
We can represent the agent’s preferences over inter-temporal consumption by the Cobb-Douglas utility function:
Where are positive parameters. For convenience, take the log-linear transformation:
The inter-temporal UMP is:
( ) ( )
Assuming , combined with , implies that at the optimal solution . As such, we can drop the
non-negativity constraints:
( ) ( )
The Lagrangian equation is:
{ ( ) ( ) }
For convenience, denote ( ) so that:
{ ( ) }
The FOCs are (there are no KT conditions – why?):
( )
{ ( ) }
Re-arranging the first two FOCs gives:
( )
The 3rd FOC implies:
( )
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 4 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
Solving
( ) and ( ) simultaneously yields:
( )
Substitute these in any of the first two FOCS to get:
By the envelope theorem, what is the interpretation of ? The change in due to a small change in arising from a
change in either or but not is:
⏟
{ ( ) }
|
|
At the optimum, so that:
|
That is, is the marginal utility of future value lifetime income due to a small change in either or but not :
|
Notice that this is strictly positive.
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 5 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
(1.3) [5 POINTS] Suppose the agent is given the opportunity of having either one more unit of corn income at or one
more unit of corn income at . True or false: the agent will prefer to have one more unit of corn income at ?
Show all calculations.
Answer
By the envelope theorem, the change in due to a small change in arising from a change is:
⏟
{ ( ) [ ( ) ⏟
]}
( )
( )
At the optimum, so that:
( )
This is the marginal utility due to a small change in . Applying the envelope theorem to change in yields:
Notice that since :
( )
Thus, the agent prefers to have more corn at . This is the classic finance principle of “a dollar today is worth more
than a dollar tomorrow”.
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 6 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
(1.4) [3 POINTS] Use your answer to part (1.2) to calculate that value of the real interest at which the agent is
indifferent between saving and borrowing at . Show all calculations.
Answer
Recall that the savings function can be described by the following equation where we substitute for the optimal value of
consumption at time , from part (1.2):
( )( )
The agent is indifferent between saving and borrowing at when . Setting
in the equation above,
solve for the value of the real interest rate
( )( )
( ) ( ) ( )
̂
Therefore, at ̂
the agent is indifferent between saving or borrowing at
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 7 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
(1.5) [4 POINTS] Suppose the current real interest rate is the value calculated in part (1.4). If the government levies a
small flat income tax (in units of corn) on will the agent become a saver or a borrower at ? Show all calculations.
Answer:
Suppose, ̂
, i.e. the agent is indifferent between saving and borrowing at
If the government levies a small flat income tax at , then the new future value of income, , is:
̂ ( )( ̂)
And savings at are:
̂ ̂
( )( ̂)
( )( ̂) ( )( ̂)
Simplifying the expression above yields:
̂
since by assumption.
Therefore, at the interest rate ̂ from part (1.4) such that the agent indifferent between saving and borrowing, the agent
becomes a saver if the government levies a small flat income tax at .
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 8 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
(1.6) [3 POINTS] Use your answer to part (1.2) to answer this question. True or false: a small flat income tax (in units of
corn) on has a larger impact on consumption at than consumption at ? Show all calculations.
Answer
With a small flat income tax, the future value of income is given by:
̂ ( )( )
Using the solution from part (1.2) for optimal consumption at and , we can compare the impact of a small
income tax on consumption in two periods:
( )
Impact of a small flat income tax, on consumption at time is
:
( )( )
( )
( )
( )( )
Impact of a small flat income tax, on consumption at time is
:
( )
( )
( )
( )
A small flat income tax has a larger impact on consumption at time if
( )
( )
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 9 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
Question 2 [30 POINTS]
(2.1) [3 POINTS] The following table contains the monthly closing price and monthly dividend yields on Sunoco and JP
Morgan stocks for the last 6 months of 2011:
Date Sunoco Price Sunoco Dividend Yield JP Morgan Price JP Morgan Dividend Yield
7/29/2011 40.65 0 40.45 0.006107
8/31/2011 38.14 0.00369 37.56 0
9/30/2011 31.01 0 30.12 0
10/31/2011 37.23 0 34.76 0.008301
11/30/2011 38.81 0.004029 30.97 0
12/30/2011 41.02 0 33.25 0
Source: CRSP through U of T’s CHASS system
● If the last digit of your ID # ends in 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 Calculate Sunoco’s monthly capital gains and monthly dividend
issued and enter these values below. Give a brief explanation on how to calculate capital gains and dividends.
● If the last digit of your ID # ends in 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 Calculate JP Morgan’s monthly capital gains and monthly dividend
issued and enter these values below. Give a brief explanation on how to calculate capital gains and dividends.
Answer:
Numbers in cells correspond to Sunoco/JP Morgan respectively:
Circle the stock you are analyzing:
Sunoco JP Morgan
Date Monthly Capital Gains Dividend Issued
July 2011 NA/NA
NA/NA
August 2011 -0.0617/-0.071
0.1499985/0
September 2011 -0.1869/-0.1981
0/0
October 2011 0.2006/0.1541
0/0.25003
November 2011 0.0424/-0.1090
0.14999967/0
December 2011 0.0569/0.0736
0/0
Brief explanation on how to calculate capital gains and dividends:
To calculate capital gains in period
To calculate dividend issued in period ( )
http://dc1.chass.utoronto.ca/
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 10 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
(2.2) [3 POINTS] On December 1st, 2011, the monthly interest rate on 3-month US T-Bills and reported on an annualized
basis was 0.01%. Calculate the monthly interest out of 100 on a “de-annualized” basis. Hint: You were asked to do this in
Excel Project #1. Only if you are unable to calculate this number here should you use the value 0.00002 below for the
“risk free rate” (note this is NOT the correct value and you will get a zero in all parts below if you calculate the correct
value here but use 0.00002 below instead).
Answer
Monthly rate calculated on a “de-annualized” basis is equal to
( )
( )
(2.3) [3 POINTS] The following table shows the average monthly returns and risk of Sunoco and JP Morgan stocks as well
the covariance of Sunoco and JP Morgan monthly returns over the period May 1969 to December 2011:
Sunoco JP Morgan
Average Monthly Return
0.0106 0.0114
Risk 0.0863 0.0917
Covariance 0.0016
Briefly explain: ● how to calculate the “risk” of a stock ● why JP Morgan stocks offer higher returns (on average) than
Sunoco stocks.
Answer:
(1) The “risk” of a stock is the standard deviation of its returns.
(2) JP Morgan offers higher returns on average than Sunoco in order to compensate its investors for the higher risk
associated with holding JP Morgan stocks.
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 11 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
(2.4) [4 POINTS] Write down an investor’s “mean-variance” utility function (be sure to use the correct notation for the
utility function parameter(s)). True or false: as the asset becomes riskier, the investor demands higher returns but at a
decreasing rate? Show all calculations
Answer:
An investor’s “mean-variance” utility function over the return and risk is:
[ ]
where:
- is the expected return on portfolio
- is the risk-aversion parameter
- is the variance/risk of the portfolio
An investor is facing a trade-off between the risk and return of the portfolio which can be described by the marginal rate
of substitution (MRS) between the risk and return:
It is true that the investor demands higher returns for the riskier asset: as seen from the MRS, to keep investor
indifferent, if risk increases by one unit, the expected return has to increase by (assume that the investor is risk
averse such that the risk-aversion parameter implies that ).
To check whether investor requires higher returns at a decreasing rate, take derivative of MRS with respect to risk,
and see whether MRS is decreasing in
Therefore, investor demands higher returns for riskier asset at an increasing rate (False!).
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 12 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
(2.4) [5 POINTS] For the month of January 2012, an investor wishes to construct a portfolio consisting of:
● If the last digit of your ID # ends in 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 Sunoco stocks and 3-month US T-Bills.
● If the last digit of your ID # ends in 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 JP Morgan stocks and 3-month US T-Bills.
Using the “risk free rate” calculated in part (2.2), calculate that value of the “mean-variance” utility function parameter
at which the investor will allocate 100% of portfolio funds in the risky asset. You are expected to solve the appropriate
UMP. Show all calculations to 4 decimal places.
Answer:
Let be a fraction of portfolio invested in a risky asset.
Notice that the expected return of the investor’s portfolio is equal to a weighted average of the returns of the risky and
risk free asset:
[ ] [ ] ( ) (1)
The variance of the portfolio is equal to (apply the variance formula from ECO220Y to ):
( )
⏟
( ) ⏟
(2)
The UMP of the investor is:
[ ]
Substituting (1) and (2) into UMP, the investor’s problem becomes:
[ ] ( )
Solving for yields:
[ ]
If the investor allocates 100% of the portfolio funds into the risky assets, then .
The value of the “mean-variance” utility function parameter is:
[ ]
For Sunoco,
For JP Morgan,
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 13 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
(2.5) [2 POINTS] For the month of January 2012, construct a portfolio consisting of:
● If the last digit of your ID # ends in 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 Sunoco stocks and 3-month US T-Bills by using the “risk free rate”
calculated in part (2.2) and 1.05 times the value of the “mean-variance” utility function parameter calculated in part
(2.4). What fraction of the portfolio is in the risky asset, what is expected return and risk of this portfolio? Is the investor
leveraging her portfolio and if so, indicate how she does this.
● If the last digit of your ID # ends in 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 JP Morgan stocks and 3-month US T-Bills by using the “risk free rate”
calculated in part (2.2) and 0.8 times the value of the “mean-variance” utility function parameter calculated in part (2.4).
What fraction of the portfolio is in the risky asset, what is expected return and risk of this portfolio? Is the investor
leveraging her portfolio and if so, indicate how she does this.
Show all calculations to 4 decimal places.
Answer
Sunoco JP Morgan
̃
̃
̃
[ ]
[ ]
[ ] [ ] ( )
[ ]
[ ] [ ] ( )
[ ]
Note:
In this case, the investor is not leveraging portfolio
In this case, the investor is leveraging portfolio by selling 3-month US T-Bills and
buying JP Morgan stocks
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 14 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
(2.6) [4 POINTS] For the month of January 2012, an investor wants to create a synthetic risky asset consisting of Sunoco
stocks and JP Morgan stocks. What fraction of the synthetic risky asset is in each risky asset and what is expected return
and risk of this synthetic risky asset? Use the risk free interest rate calculated in part (2.2), and if relevant, feel free to
use the utility parameter value from part (2.5) and the formula below. Show all calculations.
( )
( )
( ) ( )
[ ]
Proctors are NOT allowed to tell you anything about this formula. Please indicate which stocks are “A” and “B” and
show all calculations to 4 decimal places.
Answer
Let “A” be Sunoco stocks and let “B” be JP Morgan stocks. Then is a fraction of the synthetic risky asset in Sunoco
stocks. Using the formula above:
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
Therefore, the fraction of the synthetic risky asset in Sunoco stocks is 51% and the fraction in JP Morgan stocks is 49%.
The expected return and risk of the synthetic risky asset are:
[ ] ( )
( )
( )
√
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 15 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
(2.7) [3 POINTS] For the month of January 2012, construct a portfolio consisting of:
● If the last digit of your ID # ends in 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 3-month US T-Bills and the synthetic risky asset from part (2.6). Use
the “risk free rate” calculated in part (2.2) and use 0.9 times the value of the “mean-variance” utility function parameter
calculated in part (2.4). What fraction of the portfolio is in the risky asset, what is expected return and risk of this
portfolio? Is the investor leveraging her portfolio and if so, indicate how she does this.
● If the last digit of your ID # ends in 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 3-month US T-Bills and the synthetic risky asset from part (2.6). Use
the “risk free rate” calculated in part (2.2) and use 1.1 times the value of the “mean-variance” utility function parameter
calculated in part (2.4). What fraction of the portfolio is in the risky asset, what is expected return and risk of this
portfolio? Is the investor leveraging her portfolio and if so, indicate how she does this.
Show all calculations.
Answer
ID # ends in 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 ID # ends in 1, 3, 5, 7, 9
̃
̃
̃
[ ]
[ ]
Note:
218% of this portfolio is invested in the synthetic risky asset. The investor is leveraging by short-selling the risk-free asset – 3 month US T-Bills
187% of this portfolio is invested in the synthetic risky asset. The investor is leveraging by short-selling the risk-free asset – 3 month US T-Bills
[ ] [ ] ( )
[ ]
[ ] [ ] ( )
[ ]
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 16 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
(2.8) [3 POINTS] Use your answer to part (2.7) to answer this question. An investor has $5,000 to invest. Fill the entries in
the following table and show all calculations.
Answer
● If the last digit of your ID # ends in 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 An investor has $5,000 to invest. Fill the entries in the following table
and show all calculations below:
US 3-Month T-Bills Synthetic Asset Sunoco JP Morgan
Fraction of Portfolio in: -1.1754 2.1754 1.10959 1.0658
Dollars in: -5,876.93 10,876.93 5,547.94 5,328.99
Show calculations:
( )
( )
● If the last digit of your ID # ends in 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 An investor has $8,000 to invest. Fill the entries in the following table
and show all calculations below:
US 3-Month T-Bills Synthetic Asset Sunoco JP Morgan
Fraction of Portfolio in: -0.8687 1.8687 0.9532 0.9156
Dollars in: -6,949.75 14,949.75 7,625.34 7,324.41
Show calculations:
( )
( )
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 17 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
Question 3 [30 POINTS]
Phew! You passed ECO 204 and cruised through your third and fourth year courses. But you’re one course shy of
graduation. In desperation, you look for a “bird course” (like ECO 204) and after consulting your brainy friends you settle
on RSM 000 “The Business of Nothingness” (nope, it’s not a marketing course). The trouble is that this course is full (after
all, it’s a bird course) and you must choose one of the following options:
Either offer the RSM 000 professor a $200 bribe to let you in. With a chance ( ) the professor accepts the
bribe (tsk tsk) and immediately enrolls you in the course, for which you’ll have to pay $4,000 in tuition. On the
other hand, with a chance the professor is offended that you tried to bribe him and reports you for academic
violation (life sucks). The school confiscates your bribe, kicks you out, and fines you $2,000.
Or don’t bribe the RSM 000 professor and wait to see if you get into the course. With probability you do
get into RSM 000 in which case your total cost will be $4,000 in tuition and an opportunity cost of $500. On the
other hand, with probability ( ) you don’t get into RSM 000 in which case you will have to take a
course at Ryerson University which costs you $3,000 in tuition and an opportunity cost of $500.
(3.1) [7 POINTS] Assuming you are risk neutral, should you bribe the RSM 000 professor to let you into his course? Show
all calculations and be sure to interpret your calculations. Hint: It is strongly recommended that you draw a decision
tree.
Answer
Draw decision tree here. Show calculations below.
Decision
Bribe
Bribe accepted with probability (1-p) and you must pay the
bribe ($200) + tuition ($4000) = $4,200
You are reported for academic violaitons with probability p and you must pay the bribe ($200) +
a fine ($2000 )= $2,200
Do Not Bribe
You are enrolled into RSM 000 with probability q = 0.1 and you must pay tuition at ($4000) + an
opportunity cost ($500) =$4,500
You taka a course at Ryerson with probability (1-q) = 0.9 and you must pay tuition at Ryerson ($3000) + an opportunity cost
($500) = $3,500
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 18 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
You have to make a choice between “Bribe” and “Do Not Bribe” based on the expected values of the corresponding
outcomes (see the decision tree).
Expected value of the “Bribe” option is:
( ) ( )( )
Expected value of “Do Not Bribe” option is:
( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )
The decision rule is to bribe if . For instance, you should bribe if the following inequality
holds:
This implies that you should bribe if the probability that the professor reports you for academic violations (or simply the
probability of being caught) is equal or greater than 0.3
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 19 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
(3.2) [5 POINTS] Assume that the probability the professor will not take the bribe and report you for academic violations
is . Will you try to bribe the professor and what is the expected value of your decision? Show all calculations.
Answer
From part (3.1) we know that it is optimal to bribe if the probability that the professor will not take the bribe is greater
or equal to 0.3. Let’s show numerically that the expected value of “Do Not Bribe” when probability of being caught is 0.2
is greater than the expected value of “Bribe”:
( )
Since expected value of “Bribe” is smaller than expected value of “Do Not Bribe”, it is optimal not to bribe the professor.
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 20 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
(3.3) [10 POINTS] Assume the probability that the professor will not take the bribe and report you for academic violations
is Now suppose a friend of yours, as well as the professor’s, tells you that he will for a fee “test” the professor’s
integrity and honesty. Perhaps your friend will bring up the subject of bribes and get a feel for whether the professor will
take the bribe. You need to decide whether to make the decision of whether to bribe or not bribe the professor on the
basis of no test information (as you did in part (3.2)) or on the basis of test information. Since your friend has done this
sort of stuff in the past you ask him for a breakdown of test results and what actually happened. Here’s what your friend
gives you:
Professor Took Bribe Professor Did not Take Bribe Total
Positive (evidence that professor is corrupt) 15 5 20
Negative (evidence that professor is not corrupt) 5 75 80
Total 20 80 100
Based on the information in this table, should you make the decision to bribe versus not bribe the professor by hiring
your friend to do “tests” on the professor? Draw the decision tree below, show all calculations, and indicate what you
will do if the test comes back positive or negative.
Answer
Draw decision tree here. Show calculations below.
Decision
Test result is positive with
probability 0.2
Bribe
Do Not Bribe
Test result is negative with probability 0.8
Bribe
Do Not Bribe
Professor took the bribe with
probability 0.75
You are reported for academic violations with probability 0.25
RMS 000 with probability
q=0.1
Course at Ryerson with
probability 0.9
Professor took the bribe with
probability 0.0625
You are reported for academic violations
with probability 0.9735
RMS 000 with q=0.1
Course at Ryerson with
0.9
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 21 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
First, let’s determine the optimal decision (Bribe or Do Not Bribe) conditional on the result of the test. To do that, we
need to compute four conditional probabilities from the “historical” data:
( | ) ( )
( )
( | ) ( )
( )
( | ) ( )
( )
( | ) ( )
( )
Now, let’s determine the optimal decision for each of the positive or negative result of the test. When the test is
positive:
| ( ) ( )
|
| |
Since the expected value from the “Bribe “option when test is smaller is bigger than the expected value from the “Do
Not Bribe” option, you should not bribe the professor.
When the test is negative:
| ( ) ( )
|
| |
When the test is negative, you should bribe the professor.
Now, the expected value of the decision to bribe or not to bribe the professor by hiring your friend is equal to:
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( )
The expected value of decision with test (-$2,580) is bigger than the expected value of the decision without the test (-
$3,600). So, you should hire your friend to do “tests” on professor.
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 22 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
(3.4) [4 POINTS] [THIS IS INDEPENDENT OF PARTS (3.2) AND (3.3)] Recall that you are risk neutral. From the information above,
derive the equation of your utility function and compute the utilities of the four outcomes in your decision problem.
Show all calculations and briefly explain the steps used to derive the utility function.
Answer
Since the investor is risk-neutral, the utility function is linear and in general form can be written as , where
is a slope and is a constant. Recall that utility is ordinal, i.e. we can assign arbitrarily numbers to utility levels as long as
these numbers satisfy the ranking of preferences. For instance, let’s assign value of 100 to the best/highest outcome (-
$2,200) and 0 to the worst/lowest outcome (-$4,500).
We want to find the parameters of the utility function, and . Consider two equations for two levels of utility which
corresponds to the lowest and highest outcomes:
{ ( )
( )
And the utility function is:
The levels of utility corresponding to the four outcomes are:
-$2,200 100
-$3,500 43.51
-$4,200 13.076
-$4,500 0
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 23 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
(3.5) [4 POINTS] [THIS IS INDEPENDENT OF PARTS (3.2) AND (3.3)] Use your answer to part (3.4) to compute the certainty
equivalence to the uncertainty arising from ● bribing the professor ● not bribing the professor.
Answer
The utility function from part (3.4) is
Since the investor is risk-neutral,
By the definition of the certainty equivalent, :
By the same logic, :
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 24 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
Question 4 [15 POINTS]
[ALL PARTS ARE INDEPENDENT OF EACH OTHER] The original formula and production process for manufacturing Coca-Cola did
not permit the use of any other sweetener besides sugar.
(4.1) [5 POINTS] Assuming sugar is the only input for producing Coca-Cola, write down the equation of the long run
production function, plot an iso-quant with sugar on the x-axis and fructose on the y-axis, and characterize the returns
to scale.
Answer
The production function with only one input, , and productivity/management parameter is:
This production function exhibits constant returns to scale. That can be easily checked by doubling all the inputs:
( ) ( )
Sugar
Fructose q1
S1
q2
S2
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 25 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
(4.2) [5 POINTS] Assuming sugar, capital and labor are the only complementary inputs for producing Coca-Cola (where
each machine requires 3 units of sugar and 2 workers) write down the equation of the long run production function, plot
an iso-quant with sugar on the x-axis and labor on the y-axis, and characterize the returns to scale.
Answer
Denote machines by , workers by and sugar by . We know that the inputs are combined in the production such that
The long run production function with complementary inputs has the functional form:
( ) {
}
This production function exhibits constant returns to scale and we can check it by doubling all the inputs:
( ) {
}
( ) {
}
( ) ( )
Sugar
Labor
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 26 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
(4.3) [5 POINTS] Eventually Coke was able to reformulate Coca-Cola’s formula and manufacturing process to allow the use
of sugar and/or fructose as imperfect substitutes (with diminishing technical rate of substation) and permitting the use
of no sugar or no fructose. Write down the equation of a long run production function that describes this production
process, plot an iso-quant with sugar on the x-axis and fructose on the y-axis, and characterize the returns to scale.
Answer
There are many examples of production functions that would fit these criteria. One class is quasi-linear production
functions.
For example,
√ √
We can characterize the returns to scale by doubling all the inputs:
( ) √
( ) √ √
This long run production function exhibits decreasing returns to scale as the scaling parameter at √ is smaller than 2.
In other words, doubling all inputs leads to increase in the output less than by two.
The graph of the iso-quant for this production function is described by equation:
√
Fructose
Sugar
-
ECO 204, 2012 - 2013, Test 2 This test is copyright material and cannot be used for commercial purposes or posted anywhere without prior permission. Report violations to [email protected]
Page 27 of 27
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto (STG)
DO NOT WRITE HERE
FOR USE BY GRADERS ONLY
Question Maximum
Possible Points Score
1
2
3
4
Total Points = 100