democratizing the dbq a system-wide approach to historical thinking f or social studies and ccss

59
Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical Thinking for Social Studies and CCSS Presented by: Angela Orr, Nicolette Smith, Katie Anderson, Kristin Campbell

Upload: dyan

Post on 24-Feb-2016

30 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS. Presented by: Angela Orr, Nicolette Smith, Katie Anderson, Kristin Campbell. Please fill out the pre-survey. Introductions. Essential Question & Objectives. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Democratizing the DBQ

A System-wide Approach to Historical Thinking

for Social Studies and CCSSPresented by:

Angela Orr, Nicolette Smith, Katie Anderson, Kristin Campbell

Page 2: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

PLEASE FILL OUT THE PRE-SURVEY.

Page 3: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Introductions

Page 4: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Essential Question & Objectives

How can we help all students gain important content knowledge through the analysis of primary and secondary sources in document based questions?

Objectives:– Develop a shared understanding of the instructional

cycle of a DBQ– Identify necessary scaffolds to support students in

accessing documents in a DBQ– Evaluate the ways in which DBQs meet the goals of CCSS

Page 5: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS
Page 6: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

DBQs & Instructional Shifts

Page 7: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Smarter Balanced Testing ClaimsThe Consortium is committed to using evidence-centered design (ECD) in the development of an assessment system. As a part of this design, Smarter Balanced established four “claims” regarding what students should know and be able to do to demonstrate readiness for college and career in the domain of ELA and literacy.

• Claim #1 – Students can read closely and analytically to a range of increasingly complex literary and informational texts.

• Claim #2 – Students can produce effective and well-grounded writing for a range of purposes and audiences.

• Claim #3 – Students can employ effective speaking and listening skills for a range of purposes and audiences.

• Claim #4 – Students can engage in research/inquiry to investigate topics, and to analyze, integrate, and present information.

Page 8: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Disclaimers• We are providing a “snapshot” experience today. To properly

implement a DBQ, you will need at least two weeks of classroom time where the teacher and students are fully engaged in learning experiences.

• Expectations: engage like a student (think deeply, write down answers, read quietly, etc.); group work to intentional listening - quiet signal

• A DBQ is not:– A packet for students to work on independently.– Something to be done entirely for homework.– A time filler.

Page 9: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Primary and Secondary Sources

Page 10: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

What are primary sources?• Original records from

the past recorded by people who were:– Involved in the event– Witnessed the event, OR– Knew the persons

involved in the event

• They can also be objects (artifacts) or visual evidence.

• They give you an idea about what people alive at the time saw or thought about the event.

Page 11: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Examples of Primary Sources• Diaries / Letters / Journals• Speeches / Interviews• Audio and Video Recordings• Photographs • Original literary or

theatrical works• Original advertisements• Magazine and Newspaper

Articles (as long as they are written soon after the fact)

Page 12: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

What are secondary sources?

• Secondary sources are made at a later time.• They include written information by

historians or others AFTER an event has taken place.

• Although they can be useful and reliable, they cannot reflect what people who lived at the time thought or felt about the event.

Page 13: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Examples of secondary sources:

• Textbooks, biographies, charts, histories, newspaper report by someone who was not present

Page 14: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

What is a DBQ?

• Collection of primary and secondary sources• Often highlighting multiple perspectives• Used to answer an overarching historical

question• Includes writing and discussion

Page 15: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Structure of the Binder

• Document Based Questions (11)• Teacher Toolkit• Overheads

*one per school / make copies of what you will be using

Page 16: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

The DBQ Project Method

Step 1: Engaging the students – The Hook

Step 2: Building Context – The Background Essay

Step 3: Clarifying the Questions – Defining Key Terms

Step 4: Understanding the Documents – Close Analysis

Step 5: Grouping the documents – Bucketing

Step 6: Writing an Informational or Argumentative Essay

Step 7: (optional) Discussion

Page 17: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Anatomy of Each DBQ

• Enhanced Version & Clean Version• Teacher Pages and Student Pages• Overarching Question• Hook• Background Essay with Questions• Pre-bucketing* & Analysis of Question• Documents (4-7)• Bucketing• Writing (Outline & Writing Samples)

Page 18: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

WHY HOOK?

Page 19: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Weighing Costs & Benefits

• Every choice a person (or government or organizations) results in both costs and benefits.

• Both costs and benefits can include:

Page 20: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

The Issue• In 1956, the U.S. Congress passed the National

Interstate and Defense Highways Act. The bill created what we now call the Interstate Highway System. (What? What the heck did people do before highways? Was that back in dinosaur time? )

• The interstate system was build over a 35-year period and cost hundreds of billions of dollars (90% of which was federal money and a gas tax).

• Complete a cost-benefit analysis of this project.

Page 21: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Sorting Activity

Costs of the Project Benefits of the Project

If you lived in 1956, would you have supported this government project to build interstate highways?

Why is it important to look at major projects with a cost-benefit analysis?

How can we use this idea to answer our DBQ question: The Great Wall of China: Did the benefits

outweigh the costs?

Page 22: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Building BackgroundEQ: How can we help ALL students begin the DBQ with basic background knowledge?1. Beginning, middle, end of unit2. Necessary vocabulary 3. Maps and/or timelines to orient students to time and

place4. Textbook pages for basic background5. Breaking down the question together6. Teacher Pages for Docs (Read through some of these to

see if there is background information you would provide to students in a lecture format.)

Page 23: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Background Essay

• Please read the background essay silently.• Follow along as I read it aloud to you.• Work with your group to answer the

Background Essay Questions.

Page 24: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Three Tiers of Academic Vocabulary

Tier 3: Low frequency, content specific words

Tier 2: High frequency, multiple meanings, found

across academic texts

Tier 1: Vocabulary of everyday language

Page 25: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Tier 2 Vocabulary• represent the more sophisticated vocabulary of

written, academic texts (used frequently in these types of texts)

• the words used by students who have a mature vocabulary

• students encounter them less frequently as listeners • The lack of redundancy of Tier 2 in oral language as

well as the different meanings of these words depending on context, present challenges to students.

Page 26: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Tier 2 & 3 Words• When choosing what Tier Two or Tier Three

words to explicitly teach and reinforce with students, consider the following questions you might ask yourself:

– Which words are most important to understanding the text we are going to read and/or the concept we are about to study?

– Which words do students already have prior knowledge of?

– Which words can be figured out using context clues?

Page 27: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Vocabulary Scan

• Look through the documents in this DBQ.

• Make a list of the terms you will need to teach students.– Tier 2– Tier 3

Page 28: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

WHY MODEL?

Page 29: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Modeling Document Analysis

• Teaching Historical Thinking Skills• Demonstrating the struggle• Interrogating documents• Wondering/thinking aloud• Preparing students for small group analysis

Page 30: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS
Page 31: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS
Page 32: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS
Page 33: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Small Group Analysis• Before answering questions:– Source the document– Talk about it (What do you notice? What sticks out

to you?)• Work with group to answer questions.• For each document, determine what evidence

supports costs? Which supports benefits?• What potential roadblocks would students

have with this document?

Page 34: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

What did we learn from document analysis?

• What would you require students to do with each document?

• How much class time would building background and document analysis take?

• What roadblocks did you identify? How mights we hurdle these?

Page 35: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

LUNCH

Page 36: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

WHY BUCKET?

Page 37: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Identify the analytical categories that develop your answer to the question. Insert evidence from the documents into each category or bucket.

Page 38: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Great Wall of China Buckets

• What should we name our buckets?– 2 or 3?

• Best way to take evidence from documents for buckets– Context (who, where info is coming from), – quote or paraphrase – followed by (Doc. Letter)

According to a letter written by Chao Cuo in 169 BCE, “The Xiongnu live on meat and cheese, wear furs, and possess no house or field.” (Doc. B)

Page 39: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

WHY WRITE?

Page 40: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

THE GREAT WALL OF ANCIENT CHINA: DID THE BENEFITS OUTWEIGH THE COSTS?

Writing an Argument

Page 41: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Definitions for Writing Standard 1• Argument - “Super Claim”: The overarching idea of an argumentative essay

that makes more than one claim.– In some cases, an argument has a single claim, but in sophisticated writing

in the secondary grades (8-12 in standards), multiple claims are made.

• Claim: a statement that asserts a main point of an argument (a side)

• Reasoning: 2 parts – a) the “because” part of an argument and the explanation for why a claim is made; b) the explicit links between the evidence and the claim; the explanation for why a particular piece of evidence is important to the claim and to the argument

• Evidence: support for the reasoning in an argument; the “for example” aspect

of an argument; the best evidence is text -based, reasonable, and reliable.

Page 42: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

What claims can you make?

• Choose your argument: benefits did/did not outweigh the costs

• Go to your buckets. Find related pieces of evidence. When you combine these 2 or 3 pieces of evidence, what kind of assertion/claim can you make to support your overarching argument?

Page 43: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Reasoning Matters• After you introduce evidence into your writing, you must say

why and how this evidence supports your argument. What turns a fact or piece of information into evidence is the connection it has with a larger claim or argument: evidence is always evidence for or against something, and you have to make that link clear with reasoning.

• We should not assume that our readers already know what we are talking about. The audience can’t read our minds: although they may be familiar with many of the ideas we are discussing, they don’t know what we are trying to do with those ideas unless we indicate it through reasoning.

Adapted from UNC at Chapel Hill College of Arts and Sciences Writing Center

Page 44: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Questions to Develop Reasoning

• O.k., I’ve just stated this point, but so what? Why is it interesting? Why should anyone care about this evidence?

• What does this information imply?• What are the consequences of thinking this way or looking at a problem

this way? (for evidence of a counterclaim)• I’ve just described what something is like or how I see it, but why is it like

that?• I’ve just said that something happens-so how does it happen? How does

it come to be the way it is?• Why is this information important? Why does it matter?• How is this idea related to my claim? What connections exist between

them? Does it support my claim? If so, how does it do that?• Can I give an example to illustrate this point?

Page 45: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Reasoning Matters (Example)Weak use of evidence

Today, we are too self-centered. Most families no longer sit down to eat together, preferring instead to eat on the go while rushing to the next appointment (Gleick 148). Everything is about what we want.

Stronger use of reasoned evidence

Today, Americans are too self-centered. Even our families don't matter as much anymore as they once did. Other people and activities take precedence. In fact, the evidence shows that most American families no longer eat together, preferring instead to eat on the go while rushing to the next appointment (Gleick 148). Sit-down meals are a time to share and connect with others; however, that connection has become less valued, as families begin to prize individual activities over shared time, promoting self-centeredness over group identity.

Why is this a weak use of evidence? Discuss with the

people next to you.

Adapted from Indiana University Writing Center

Page 46: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Write a Paragraph

• For each piece of evidence used in your writing, clearly state your reasoning.

• Over-Arching Argument: The benefits of building the Great Wall of China outweighed the costs.

• Claim 1: The Great Wall of China was of extreme benefit to the Chinese people living in the border areas.– Evidence: According to a letter written by Chao Cuo in 169 BCE,

people living in border areas lived in walled cities “well protected by high walls, deep moats, catapults, and thorns” (Doc. B).

– Reasoning: Without walled cities, the Chinese people might have been easily attacked by barbarians like the Xiongnu.

Page 47: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Questions to Ask About Writing Assignments

• How much?– Always a full essay?– Paragraph?– Outline?

• For what purpose?– Culminating assessment of understanding?– Preparation for a discussion?– Formative assessment of writing? Of gathering

evidence?

Page 48: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Chicken Foot Writing Outline• Introduction

– Basic background– Argument with 2 primary claims

• Claim Paragraph 1– Restate claim– 2 pieces of evidence with reasoning linking to the claim

• Claim Paragraph 2– Restate claim– 2 pieces of evidence with reasoning linking to the claim

• Conclusion– Although statement/counterclaim (note a piece of evidence from

other side), then restate your argument. – Wrap it all up.

Page 49: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Elements of a Proficient DBQ Essay

• Grabber• Background (time, place, story)• Restatement of the Questions• Definition of Key Terms• Super Claim and Roadmap

Introduction

• Claim• Evidence with Citation• Reasoning Linking Evidence to the Claim

Body Paragraphs

• Restatement of Super Claim• “Although” Statement (acknowledgement of

counterclaim)• Main Evidence & Reasoning that Trumps

“Although” Statement• Explanation of why the question is important

Conclusion

Page 50: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

DBQ Writing Rubric to Modify

Page 51: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Writing Samples

• Use it to model• Have students assess the sample items• Adding/modifying evidence and reasoning to

examples

Page 52: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

DBQs for Discussion

• Consider using DBQs as a jumping off point for great discuss strategies:– Structured Academic Controversy– Socratic Seminar– Philosophical Chairs

• Accountable Talk

Page 53: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Assessment Alternatives

?

Page 54: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Related Resources

• Basil Alignment Project: The Great Wall– Describes the construction of the Great Wall– Includes text-dependent questions– Includes vocabulary ideas– Includes a writing prompt (based on textual

evidence)

• These two resources together could allow students to use the Great Wall of China as a case study in Chinese culture.

Page 55: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Debrief

• How do DBQs help students build a coherent body of knowledge on a subject?

• How do DBQs help us to slow down and go deep?

• How do DBQs help us to shift instruction?• How do DBQs promote historical thinking?• How are we going to implement DBQs into our

own classrooms?

Page 56: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

Professional learning for 6th grade teachers

http://www.washoe.k12.nv.us/staff/office-of-staff-development/professional_learning_cafe

CCSS: Research Based Discussion Methods (starts January 27 – four Monday afternoons) OR sub day on 2/4 or 3/4

6th grade Social Studies: A Primer (starts February 3 – four Monday afternoons)

CCSS: Argumentative Writing (March 11 – sub day)

DBQ Follow-Up Course (1/2 day sub on 4/25, morning or afternoon) code: 6DBQApril

Page 57: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

NNCSS Conference, March 1

Page 58: Democratizing the DBQ A System-wide Approach to Historical  Thinking f or Social Studies and CCSS

POST SURVEY & EVALUATION