delineation of electrical resistivity structure using magnetotellurics: a case study from dholera...

5/28/2018 Delineation of electrical resistivity structure using Magnetotellurics: a case study from Dholera coastal region, Gujarat, India

1/6

41 G A A C

`

. A , ,, . . F, ( 1988). . . B

EM . ,

(N 2005). A , , , ,, , , , , .

. C EM (CEM), DC I P (IP) , M (M, G D (GD) . E (EM) . A I.

I I, H , I (H 2008). M . A D I, G .

()

. () () . ,

. . , () ,

.

(10001000) . () . .

. 200300 (

) 0.11.5 . 20 3235 .

*Corresponding author, E-mail address: [email protected]

Phone: +91 9566928959

2014 Journal of Coastal Sciences. All rights reserved

: ...

: 2348 6740 1 . 1 2014 4146

A B A C A I C L E I N F

28 2013

4 2014 7 2014

Dholera

Gujarat

India


2/6

42 G A A C

A G (22.248N 72.195E). D G K, 30 D A . O . D

. I , , G K, B . P A D . , AD 100 D F C (DFC) C GN H 8 D I A, B M. D N H (NH8) (A) 8A(B), BB, B. F 1.

G . , . (H 2008). G G I . .

, , , .

I N NE C G. D I 500 50 100

C N G E C F(ECF) C F (CF). 4 .

G(2004) C F (CF) D. H, ONGC (B 1982) CF . A D . B C 6.0. D , C G . D ,

, . / (H 2008). I , . L (G1981). , (M 1995), A (G 1968), , , . P C G +8+100 N (+13 +16 ML). B

F. 1


3/6

43 G A A C

NC (F. 2).

A , , . M . ( , ) . I , D I , G

. M . AD07, M G, G. A 1.5 . 80 (F. 3&4). M 1. F M P (MAPO) .

. ,

. AD07 .

..

, ' ' (G 1979). , . , .. DC .

M 1D 2D . 1D M 1D . A 2D 1D, 2D 3D 1980. , M .

F M , , , .. (H 1973). P ; . ,

71 71.2 71.4 71.6 71.8 72 72.2 72.4 72.6 72.8 73 73.221.8

22

22.2

22.4

22.6

22.8

23

Dholera

Dhanghuka

Surendranagar

Tertiary sediment Deccan basalts Alluvium Marginal Fault

& 220827

E 721341

220907

E 721440

15.9 11.54

(0) 45C 53C

80 80

F06 F06

0

1

2

10

15

60

1

2

10

15

48

.

. ( & ) D.

; D

(G A, 2000) C

, (1995).


4/6

44 G A A C

. A , .. , , , . , .

I , , .. , , , (H 1990). . I (). A , .. .

A , (ADC). . .

..

M , . . B (), , =1 N, () . O F . O , , . A ..

( , 1988). , N ,

1

2s

m

tf

=

H N . M F .

..

I ,

: . ''. ' '. M . ( . ' G ) .

: .

. A

, , F , .

..

(K) :

xx yy

xy yx

Z ZK

Z Z

+

=

F 1D ,

K=0. I , K


5/6

45 G A A C

, . J (1997) . .

B (1962) (1996)

F . A ,

x y x y

xx

x y x y

E P B Q E Q E PZ

B P B Q B Q E P

=

x x x x

xy

y x y x

E P B Q E Q E PZ

B P B Q B Q E P

=

y y y y

yx

x y x y

E P B Q E Q E PZ

B P B Q B Q E P

=

y x y x

yy

y x y x

E P B Q E Q E PZ

B P B Q B Q E P

=

* ; P, B , B, EE < > , .. . A

.H

, () A , ; . . I , M , E B. D , / M . F,

. , M , . M . : 1. D (2000), 2: 2 ( 2003).

..

(M) . . F M

. I . .

M M .

O (1D) . 1D , .. 2D , , 3D. , , 1D ( ,1988). 1D 2D . 1D B O . . I , . O ( 45 ). O . A M; . I

. I () .

. B M GL.

..

GL G

(NL

. 1D

2D M . NLCG , ( 1967). , . 2D , , .


6/6

46 G A A C

B M .P M 5.

L. B 160180 ( ) 0.11.5 . 20 3235 , . A 1 . 12

.

O M 200 300 . . , D . 2D .

D. B.K. , D G, I (I) . M. P K (B, I) M. D(G, I), P C, K (JF, I) P, J (D, I) .

B, .., D .., 2002.

: E G, ,

, 215 .

B, .., 1982.

. A

A G 66, 14971513.

B, F.., ., , H.., 1962.

. . E, 40(11), 233923

C, ., 1960. D

. .D , .

DH, C., C, ., 1990. ' G

D D. G 5516131624.

G, .B., G, .., C, ., 1979.

. G 44, 5368.

G, A., 2004. A G . .

. E

. 77, , 257 G .

G, .., 1981. C

, . G 10, 279

H, ., 2008. A

G 68, 337356.H, .F., 1973. D. E

7, 349364.

, ..., 1997. E F A

A. G 18, 441475.

, A., 1996. C .

G 17, 361391., .., 1995. G G; B, : G

, G., 2005. E C A

. G

26, 593651.

, .B., 1988. A F

G 9, 245257.

, .B., E, ., 2005. 2D

. G 70, G33G4

, ., E, G., 2000. A E D

2D D. G 65, 791803.

, . ., 2003.

. G

152, 17.

, .., B, .., 1988.

. G 3(12), 15651576.

, B.., , .., 1988.

G. 9, 259285.

, C. ., 1967. A

. D

. C, A

, .., G, .., H, .., , G., , .

1968. H C, G, . B

G 6(6), 153166.

. B

;

delineation of electrical resistivity structure using magnetotellurics: a case study from dholera...

Documents