delegates assembly agenda - prairiecat · prairiecat delegates assembly ... colona pl...
TRANSCRIPT
220 W. 23rd Avenue
Coal Valley, IL 61240
(877) 542-7257
http://support.prairiecat.info
PrairieCat Delegates Assembly
October 25, 2017 10:00 a.m. – 3:00 p.m.
Kishwaukee College Conference Center 21193 Malta Rd, Malta, IL
Agenda The Delegates Assembly will meet on Wednesday, October 25, 10 a.m. – 3:00 p.m. at Kishwaukee
College Conference Center, Malta, IL. The meeting will also be available via GoTo meeting software.
Delegates may also attend and vote via GoTo although we strongly encourage attendance in person if
possible. According to the PrairieCat bylaws we must have a quorum of delegates in person at Malta to
be able to vote on issues. Also, Delegates Assembly participation is required of all Fully Participating
and Basic Online libraries and the four Union List reps. As always, please remember that only officially
designated Delegates or their Alternates can vote on behalf of their library. Walk-in substitutes will not
be permitted to vote, and there are no proxy votes if a delegate is not present.
There is a link in the GoTo meeting event in L2 to register
for the meeting to participate via GoTo.
I. Call to order and welcome
II. Introductions and welcome new delegates or alternates
III. Introduction of Guests
IV. Review of agenda for additions/changes
V. Public Comments at Malta or via GoToMeeting
VI. Consent Agenda
a. Approve minutes for July 26, 2017 PrairieCat Delegates Assembly meeting
(pp. 2-11)
b. Central Site report including financial and statistical reports (pp. 12-16)
VII. Administrative Council Report
a. Finance Committee Report – Report from meeting 9/21/2017
b. Resource Sharing Committee Report – No Report
c. Sustainability Committee – No Report
d. Social media report (Elizabeth Smith)
e. PrairieCat Membership Update
i. Update on libraries being added or moving up, Departing members (Judy
Hutchinson)
ii. PUG Day Review (Judy Hutchinson, Elizabeth Smith) (p. 17)
iii. Discussion of Call Number Standardization project (Judy Hutchinson)
f. Consortium Committee discussion and RAILS strategic directions for LLSAPs (Dee
Brennan, Anne Slaughter, RAILS)
g. Review of budget and fee recommendations for FY19 (pp. 18-24)h. Review and approval, PrairieCat Strategic Plan 2017-2021 (pp. 25-36)i. FY17 Audit report (audit documentation can be found here:
https://support.prairiecat.info/sites/default/files/gov/finance/PrairieCat%20617%20AFR.PDF)
j. Brief Overview and Demonstration: Biblioboard (RAILS Staff)
VIII. Review of meeting – What worked, what didn’t
IX. Public Comments at Malta or via phone
X. Next regularly scheduled meeting, January 31, 2018, Kishwaukee College, Malta, IL
1
PrairieCat Delegates Assembly July 26, 2017
10:00 a.m. – 3:00 p.m.
Kishwaukee College Conference Center
21193 Malta Rd, Malta, IL
Minutes - DRAFT The Delegates Assembly met on Wednesday, July 26, 10 a.m. – 3:00 p.m. at Kishwaukee College
Conference Center, Malta, IL. The meeting was also available via GoTo meeting software. Delegates
may also attend and vote via GoTo although we strongly encourage attendance in person if possible.
According to the PrairieCat bylaws we must have a quorum of delegates in person at Malta to be able
to vote on issues. Also, Delegates Assembly participation is required of all Fully Participating and Basic
Online libraries and the four Union List reps. As always, please remember that only officially
designated Delegates or their Alternates can vote on behalf of their library. Walk-in substitutes will not
be permitted to vote, and there are no proxy votes if a delegate is not present.
There is a link in the GoTo meeting event in L2 to register
for the meeting to participate via GoTo.
I. Call to order and welcome
Present in Malta: Andrew Allen, Nancy Ashbrook, Richard Ashley, Jennifer Barton, Amanda Bennett, Leah Bill, Noreen Bormet, Leann Bredberg, Angela Campbell, Mary
Cheatwood, Carolyn Coulter (RAILS/ PrairieCat), Barb Coward, Rici Dale, Doreen Dalman, Dixie DeBord, Andrew Dettman, Ellen Finfrock, Jolene Franciskovich, Rose
Gilman, Debbie Griggs, Sue Hebel, Lynette Heiden, Ashley Hopper, Deanna Howard
Judy Hutchinson (RAILS/ PrairieCat), Jay Kalman, Emily Klonicki, Michelle Krooswyk, Melissa Landis, Bryon Lear, Jamie Lockwood, Laura Long, Susanna Ludwig, Kimberly
Martin, Kelly McCully, Maria Meachum, Pennie Miller, Jeffrey Munson, Beatrice O'Connell, Lauren Offerman, Cathy Palmer, Whitney Parrillo, Nichole Phillips, Jane
Plass (RAILS), Emily Porter, Rylie Roubal, Charm Ruhnke, Michael Skwara, Elizabeth Smith (RAILS/ PrairieCat), Patti Smith, Cristy Stupegia, Jeff Sullivan (RAILS/
PrairieCat), Denise Tollensdorf, Amy Walsh, Julie Wayland, Barb White, Peggy Wogen, Paula Wold
Present via GoToMeeting: Cindy Bahr, Victoria Blackmer, Penny Bryant, Rebekah Clark, Laura Crisp, Jodie DePatis, Sarah Flanagan, Julie Harte, Britni Hartman, Mary
Holtrop, Jason Jensen (RAILS/ PrairieCat), Jessica Arnold, Ann Marie Jinkins, Kacy Kelly (RAILS/ PrairieCat), Lori Matlack, Cynthia Maxwell, Sara McCambridge, Carol
McSweeney, Laurel Reiss, Kimberly Scace, Linda Schreiber, John Slanicky (RAILS/ PrairieCat), Don Thorsen, Phyllis Von Arb, Deborah Wunsch
Libraries represented: Andalusia TL, Bertolet ML (GoToMeeting), Bourbonnais PL,
Bradley PL(GoToMeeting), Byron PLD, Charles B. Phillips PL, Clinton Township PLD,
Coal City PL, Colona PL (GoToMeeting), Community Unit SD #2, Cordova PL, Cortland Community Library, DeKalb PL, Earlville PL, East Dubuque DL (GoToMeeting), East
Moline PL, Elizabeth TL (GoToMeeting), Ella Johnson ML, Erie PL (GoToMeeting), Flagg-Rochelle PLD (GoToMeeting), Forreston PL (UL rep) (GoToMeeting), Fossil Ridge
PL, Franklin Grove PLD, Galena PLD, Genoa PLD, Graves-Hume PL (GoToMeeting), Hanover TL, Highland Community College, Hinckley PLD, Homer Township Public
2
Library (GoToMeeting), Joliet HS District #204, Kankakee Public Library, LaSalle PL, Malta PL, Manhattan PL, Manteno PL, Maple Park PL, Mokena PL, Moline PL, Morris Area
PL, Mount Morris PL, New Lenox PL, Odell PL (GoToMeeting), Oglesby PL (GoToMeeting), Oregon PL, Pearl City PL, Pecatonica PL (GoToMeeting), Peotone PL,
Peru PL, Plano Community PL, Polo PLD, Princeton PL, Prophetstown-Lyndon-Tampico SD (GoToMeeting), Putnam County PL, Reddick PL, Richard A Mautino, Robert R. Jones
DL (GoToMeeting), Robert W. Rowe PL, Rochelle Twp High School (UL rep) (GoToMeeting), Rock Island PL, Sandwich PLD, Schmaling ML (GoToMeeting), Silvis PL,
Stockton PL (GoToMeeting), Somonauk PL (GoToMeeting), South Beloit PL, Streator PL
(GoToMeeting), Sycamore PL (GoToMeeting), Three Rivers PL, Western Dist PL (GoToMeeting), Wilmington PL, Yorkville PL
Libraries not represented: Creston-Dement PL, Freeport PLD, Geneseo PL, Grant
Park PL, Henry C Adams ML, Julia Hull PL, Lena CL, Limestone PL, Meridian Schools, Moline High School (UL rep), Plano CUSD#88, Princeton Twp HS, Putnam County
Schools, River Valley DL, Rockridge High School (UL rep), Seneca PL, Sherrard PLD, United Township HS, Walnut PL
Porter (Chair-BY) started the meeting at 10:00 am. Coulter (RAILS/PrairieCat) welcomed everyone.
II. Introductions and welcome new delegates or alternates
The delegates welcomed new delegates Rose Gilman (MR) and Patti Smith (RO); theyalso welcomed new alternate Whitney Parrillo (SI).
Porter (Chair-BY) thanked Ruhnke (PU), Allen (CD), and Cervantes (MK) for their
service on Administrative Council.
Porter (Chair-BY) welcomed Peterson (RY), Long (EM), and Dettman (OR) as newly
elected members of Administrative Council.
III. Introduction of GuestsThe delegates welcomed Jane Plass (RAILS).
IV. Review of agenda for additions/changes
There were no revisions.
V. Public Comments at Malta or via GoToMeeting
There were no public comments.
VI. Consent Agendaa. Approve minutes for April 26, 2017 PrairieCat Delegates Assembly meeting (pp.)
b. Central Site report including financial and statistical reports (pp.)
Motion #1: Miller (PP) moved and Ashley (FR) seconded to approve the
consent agenda as presented. There was no discussion on the motion. Motion carries on a roll call.
Ayes: 69
Nays: 0 Abstentions: 0
VII. Administrative Council Report
3
a. Finance Committee Report – No Reportb. Resource Sharing Committee Report – No Report
c. Sustainability Committee – No Reportd. Social media report (Elizabeth Smith)
Smith (RAILS/PrairieCat) reminded delegates to follow PrairieCat on Facebook andTwitter. She shared PING! subscribers are at 263. PUG Day is on Friday,
September 29 and registration is open. All member library staff are encouraged toattend this professional development event.
e. Strategic Planning reportCoulter (RAILS/PrairieCat) thanked those who attended the Strategic Planning
Summit, about forty percent of the membership was represented. After theSummit, PrairieCat released another survey for more feedback. Currently,
PrairieCat staff and the Administrative Council are working with the consultant torefine the draft plan and the annualized work plan. The consultant met with the
Administrative Council for a work session to review the plan. Now, PrairieCat staffare going through the documents to flesh out the work plan and details. We should
have a draft plan in mid-August. The final plan should be ready for approval at the
October Delegates Assembly meeting.
f. PrairieCat Membership Updatei. Update on libraries being added or moving up, Departing members (Judy
Hutchinson)Hutchinson (RAILS/PrairieCat) reported PrairieCat staff are actively working to
bring in the new libraries. Johnsburg PLD will Go Live in December 2017.Marseilles will Go Live in January 2018. PrairieCat staff will be loading the
Marseilles information into the catalog and in the fall they will be operating as
a Union List member until they are ready to Go Live as a circulating member.
Four Union List members withdrew as of June 30, 2017: Hononegah CHSD#207, Rockford Lutheran Schools, Savanna Public Library District,
United States Army Corps of Engineers.
ii. Warren Township Public Library IGA and Profile, membership vote (pp.)
Motion #2: Miller (PP) moved and Meachum (WL) seconded to accept the
Warren Township Public Library IGA to join as a Basic Online member. There was no discussion on the motion. Motion carries on a roll call.
Ayes: 69
Nays: 0 Abstentions: 0
g. Overlay project overview and discussion (Jane Plass, RAILS)
Plass (RAILS) summarized the Overlay Project. There are several consortia in
RAILS and several libraries on standalone systems. The Overlay Project was put inthe RAILS plan of service in FY12 to improve resource sharing by linking the
integrated library systems to improve ease of interlibrary loans. This has alwaysbeen a voluntary program. The Project began with an environmental scan and they
identified a number of states with similar situations. In Phase 2 the committeesurveyed libraries to see what concerns and opinions libraries had of the Overlay
Project. The consultant did several focus groups with other constituents duringPhase 2.
4
Plass (RAILS) explained the next step was a small pilot project. RAILS invited
participation in the software search working group. PrairieCat voted to participate in the software working group. Rock River Consortium, Carli, Sterling PL, and
PrairieCat volunteered to participate in the group. The working group has been investigating software vendors, and sent out requests for proposals. Autographics,
Innovative Interfaces, and OCLC submitted proposals. All three vendors did full day demos in May. The demos were recorded if anyone is interested in seeing them;
they are on the RAILS website. After the demos, the working group asked for the
best and final offers from the vendors then did another round of clarification. The working group also contracted with a consultant to assist with analyzing final
offers. The working group then rescored the vendors. The working group did make a recommendation to the Consortia Committee. The Consortia Committee asked for
clarification before voting on the recommendation so Plass cannot share the recommendation. After the Consortia Committee, the recommendation will go to
the RAILS board.
Plass (RAILS) continued, assuming we get approval and the project moves forward,
she wants to share next steps. PrairieCat is eligible for participation in the pilot project. The RFP was written with the idea that the libraries who participated in the
software working group would be invited to participate in the pilot project. Three libraries from the Rock River consortium (Sterling, Dixon, Rock Falls HS)
agreed to participate in the pilot project. Plass still needs to discuss with I-Share. The pilot project will be about ten to twenty libraries total. Ideally five to ten
PrairieCat libraries along with the three from Rock River and possible two to three from I-Share. The benefits of the pilot project include a new service to offer to
patrons, the library is at the forefront of resource sharing, the ability to decide
internally if you want to deny an ILL request, and pilot participation will give libraries the opportunity to provide feedback and have a voice in the early decision-
making. One of the goals of the project is to see a reduction in staff time of processing ILL. RAILS intends to support the pilot project so there would be no cost
to PrairieCat libraries participating in the pilot phase. Plass said we do expect there will be some fee once the Overlay Project is in an active stage. We anticipate a
two-year pilot project; if it’s very successful then we might decide to expand sooner.
Pilot libraries would commit to use the system actively; it would be for interlibrary loans that cannot be filled through PrairieCat. The participating library would need
to designate a primary contact person, and encourage patrons to use ILL. The libraries would need to provide some information for implementation, but much of
the work is done by the vendor. Some staff would need to go to training to learn to use the system. Another potential benefit is it may lead to examining current
workflow for ILL. The participating library would provide feedback such as estimating ILL costs. Each participating consortia needs to have representation on
the Overlay Project Working Group; Coulter (RAILS/PrairieCat) agreed to be on the
group as PrairieCat’s representative. As far as timeline, Plass (RAILS) hopes to start this fall, but depends on the vendor and other approvals. Plass said we plan
on PrairieCat and Rock River coming on first then bringing in the i-Share academic libraries. Plass said if you are interested in being a pilot library then please email
Jane at [email protected]. Send the volume of ILL (excluding PrairieCat) done through the system and a statement of interest. Plass has a FAQ sheet she is
finalizing and will send to Smith (RAILS/PrairieCat) for distribution.
5
Porter (Chair-BY) asked if the patron has to be a Byron patron if her library volunteers for the pilot project. Plass (RAILS) said yes. Ludwig (GA) asked if she
could expand on the role of academic libraries. Plass said if any i-Share libraries choose to participate then that would allow the ILL request directly to those
libraries. They want to facilitate reciprocal borrowing but not there yet. It would open up discovery and resource sharing through academics. Some libraries have
ILLnet but that is only for staff use; it is not patron facing. For standalone libraires, the pilot project is limited to just consortia because it is more efficient to connect
the ILS. Plass said the cost model for the final project would aim to be affordable.
If libraries choose to participate in the pilot project, they can discontinue if needed.
Miller (PP) asked since the pilot project is only for ILL not filled through PrairieCat, then would it be very beneficial to join if at her library there are not many ILL filled
outside of PrairieCat. Plass (RAILS) said it does give the option to do patron-initiated ILL so perhaps there would be more ILL. If a patron tries to place a
request through the Overlay Project and it could be filled through PrairieCat it will redirect to fill through PrairieCat. Meachum (WL) asked would the IL state report
give a good idea of out of system holds. Plass said the traffic report is in state
versus out of state and not divided up within the system. Plass said she prefers to get the numbers directly from the library as some people interpret the ILL numbers
differently.
There are some other benefits they will be exploring such as searching for other e-resources and the ability to harvest catalog records from other participating
libraries. Plass (RAILS) said one of the goals of the project was to provide an alternative to OCLC for libraries that want one.
h. Projects Report: OPAC “splash screen”Coulter (RAILS/PrairieCat) reported the splash screens are live now. There are
instructions on how to edit the OPAC launch page on the Resources page of thePrairieCat support site. See TB49 - Editing Your Encore Homepage.
i. Review and explanation of RAILS financial allocations to PrairieCat (pp.)
Coulter (RAILS/PrairieCat) said in light of the PrairieCat staffing independenceinitiative she wanted to explain how RAILS provides funding to PrairieCat.
Currently, PrairieCat staff are RAILS staff allocated to PrairieCat. PrairieCat as an
organization is investigating a staffing independence initiative to move staff fromRAILS to PrairieCat; PrairieCat would pay staff salaries and benefits. This initiative
would improve PrairieCat’s sustainability and lessen PrairieCat’s reliance on statefunding.
RAILS provides financial support to the LLSAPs including PrairieCat. RAILS uses a
support formula to determine how much funding PrairieCat should receive. In FY18, RAILS allocated $678,890 in support to PrairieCat. RAILS determines RAILS
expenses for supporting PrairieCat with services including staff and operations (IT,
facilities, accounting etc.), which in FY18 comes to $1,187,892. PrairieCat then pays the difference of the amount that is owed over and above the amount that is
awarded to RAILS. In FY16, PrairieCat and RAILS entered into a contract to lock in the cost to PrairieCat for this amount of variance. PrairieCat fees are stabilized until
the end of FY18 at $426,990.72. This contract expires at the end of FY18, and RAILS is currently ascertaining how to handle these funds moving forward. The
suggestion has been that RAILS may level fund PrairieCat in FY19, however this is dependent on RAILS board decisions.
6
Coulter (RAILS/PrairieCat) said the Sustainability Committee has been investigating
PrairieCat staffing independence. PrairieCat cannot be in IMRF because as an organization PrairieCat does not have a year of auditable revenue. PrairieCat could
try to join IMRF later after having auditable finances to show. Coulter said PrairieCat would most likely do a 401A plan through ICMARC. The Finance
Committee will be discussing some of this as well. Coulter needs to have a conversation with RAILS about the services as far as what we don't need and how
we can reduce costs. Coulter said feel free to send her an email with any questions.
Coulter (RAILS/PrairieCat) said RAILS would like to see the LLSAPs move toward
sustainability with the understanding that support from the State will probably diminish. PrairieCat wants to make sure that if something happens with state
funding that PrairieCat would not collapse. RAILS wants to support resource sharing but we have to be realistic. Plass (RAILS) added RAILS wants to support
resource sharing as much as we can and that is reflected in the budget. RAILS is encouraging greater sustainability not because we don’t support resource sharing
but with the understanding that state budgeting can be unstable and may diminish.
Plass said we want to be proactive.
Coulter (RAILS/PrairieCat) said we want to make these changes gradually so it is not such a large burden at once. Coulter said that will also give PrairieCat authority
over staff. Coulter clarified PrairieCat exists as an intergovernmental instrumentality so it already exists as an organization. Adding staff to PrairieCat
would give them more sustainability. The Finance Committee has to work out a budget that considers all of the factors. Gilman (MR) said SWAN went through this
process a few years ago and now have their own facilities. Coulter said we are
using SWAN heavily as a resource. Coulter said she is running several budget scenarios that the Finance Committee will be reviewing soon at the August 2
meeting. Ashley (FR) volunteered to be on the Finance Committee.
j. Presentation and discussion: Innovative IdeaLab (Judy Hutchinson)Hutchinson (RAILS/PrairieCat) shared Innovative has a new platform to handle
Enhancements for the company that tie into product enhancements. Forbackground, the process used to be ballot based and PrairieCat could vote on
those. PrairieCat is one member of the Innovative Users Group (IUG) so we only
had one vote.
In June, Innovative launched IdeaLab. It is an online interface where users can chat about product development and enhancements. Innovative is encouraging
anyone from any customer to participate. PrairieCat staff feel it is important for PrairieCat to be involved. Hutchinson (RAILS/PrairieCat) explained Innovative posts
a challenge. For example, the most recent challenge was about leveraging data – how might we use data to improve library services? Anything is on the table, so
users can submit ideas and others can comment and add to them. Then users can
vote for the best idea. PrairieCat has the ability to express what is important to us to the company. The leveraging data challenge ended today so a new challenge
should be posted soon.
The process is easy to use. The url is on the handout to login. You can create your account; PrairieCat is the institution and the site code is PRCAT. The Training
Committee will be discussing this at their upcoming meeting. Hutchinson (RAILS/PrairieCat) said do remember you are weighing in on behalf of PrairieCat.
7
Please do get involved. Ashbrook (SI) asked about the enhancements PrairieCat has already requested. Hutchinson said the IUG officers are aware customers have
this concern. Innovative is working closely with the IUG steering committee to bring in the enhancements requests from the past several years.
VIII. Review of meeting – What worked, what didn’t
The meeting went well.
IX. Public Comments at Malta or via phone
There were no public comments
X. Next regularly scheduled meeting, October 25, 2017, Kishwaukee College, Malta, IL
8
PrairieCat Delegates Assembly Vote Tally
July 26, 2017
Total voting members: 91 Total needed for quorum: 46 Total needed for 2/3 vote: 60
LLSAP
CodeIn person: 50
GoTo: 22
Total: 72
Move:
Second:
Move:
Second:
Move:
Second:
LLSAP
CodeAgency
Y = in person
G = GoTo
NP= Not
present for
vote
Yes
69 No Abstain
Yes
69 No Abstain Yes No Abstain
AN Andalusia Township Library Y X X
BM Bertolet Memorial Library District G X X
BD Bourbonnais Public Library District Y X X
BR Bradley Public Library District G X X
BY Byron Public Library District Y X X
CP Charles B. Phillips Public Library District Y X X
CT Clinton Township Public Library Y X X
CC Coal City Public Library District Y X X
CL Colona District Public Library G X X
CF Community Unit SD 2 (Serena) Y X X
CO Cordova District Library Y X X
CN Cortland Community Library Y X X
CR Creston-Dement Public Library
DK DeKalb Public Library Y X X
EA Earlville Public Library District Y X X
EP East Dubuque District Library G X NP
EM East Moline Public Library Y X X
EL Elizabeth Township Library G X X
EJ Ella Johnson Memorial Public Library District Y X X
ER Erie Public Library District G NP NP
FL Flagg-Rochelle Public Library District G NP X
FO Forreston Public Library (UL rep) G X X
FR Fossil Ridge Public Library District Y X X
FG Franklin Grove Public Library Y X X
FP Freeport Public Library
GA Galena Public Library District Y X X
GP Geneseo Public Library District
GE Genoa Public Library District Y X X
GR Grant Park Public Library
GV Graves-Hume Public Library District G X X
HN Hanover Township Library Y X X
HE Henry C Adams Memorial Library
Motion #1: To approve the
consent agenda as presented
Motion #2: To accept the
Warren Township Public Library
IGA to join as a Basic Online
member.
Miller (PP)
Ashley (FR)
Miller (PP)
Meachum (WL)
PrairieCat Delegates Assembly Vote Tally - July 26, 20179
PrairieCat Delegates Assembly Vote Tally
July 26, 2017
LLSAP
CodeIn person: 50
GoTo: 22
Total: 72
Move:
Second:
Move:
Second:
Move:
Second:
LLSAP
CodeAgency
Y = in person
G = GoTo
NP= Not
present for
vote
Yes
69 No Abstain
Yes
69 No Abstain Yes No Abstain
Motion #1: To approve the
consent agenda as presented
Motion #2: To accept the
Warren Township Public Library
IGA to join as a Basic Online
member.
Miller (PP)
Ashley (FR)
Miller (PP)
Meachum (WL)
HC Highland Community College (Clarence Mitchell Library) Y X X
HK Hinckley Public Library District Y X X
HD Homer Township Public Library District G X X
JC Joliet Township High SD 204 Y X X
JH Julia Hull District Library
KK Kankakee Public Library Y X X
LE Lena Community Library
LS LaSalle Public Library Y X X
LI Limestone Township Library District
ML Malta Township Public Library Y X X
MT Manhattan-Elwood Public Library District Y X X
MN Manteno Public Library District Y X X
MP Maple Park Public Library District Y X X
MS Meridian C.U.S.D. #223
MK Mokena Community Public Library District Y X X
MV Moline School District #40 - Moline High School (UL rep)
MX Moline Public Library Y X X
MR Morris Area Public Library District Y X X
MM Mt. Morris Public Library Y X X
NL New Lenox Public Library District Y X X
OD Odell Public Library G X X
OG Oglesby Public Library District G X X
OR Oregon Public Library District Y X X
PP Pearl City Public Library District Y X X
PT Pecatonica Public Library District G X X
PE Peotone Public Library District Y X X
PU Peru Public Library Y X X
PD Plano Community Library District Y X X
PX Plano CUSD 88
PO Polo Public Library District Y X X
PR Princeton Public Library Y X X
PF Princeton Township High SD 500
PrairieCat Delegates Assembly Vote Tally - July 26, 201710
PrairieCat Delegates Assembly Vote Tally
July 26, 2017
LLSAP
CodeIn person: 50
GoTo: 22
Total: 72
Move:
Second:
Move:
Second:
Move:
Second:
LLSAP
CodeAgency
Y = in person
G = GoTo
NP= Not
present for
vote
Yes
69 No Abstain
Yes
69 No Abstain Yes No Abstain
Motion #1: To approve the
consent agenda as presented
Motion #2: To accept the
Warren Township Public Library
IGA to join as a Basic Online
member.
Miller (PP)
Ashley (FR)
Miller (PP)
Meachum (WL)
TW Prophetstown-Lyndon-Tampico CUD#3 G X X
UC Putnam County SD 535 - High School
UE Putnam County Public Library District Y X X
RL Reddick Public Library District Y X X
MA Richard A Mautino Memorial Library Y X X
RD River Valley District Library
CV Robert R. Jones Public Library District G X X
RO Robert W. Rowe Public Library District Y X X
RW Rochelle Township High School (UL rep) G X X
RP Rock Island Public Library Y X X
RY Rockridge CUSD #300 - High School (UL rep)
SA Sandwich Public Library District Y X X
SC Schmaling Memorial Library G X X
SE Seneca Public Library District
SD Sherrard Public Library District
SL Silvis Public Library Y X X
SN Somonauk Public Library District G X X
SB South Beloit Public Library Y X X
SK Stockton Township Public Library G X X
SR Streator Public Library G X X
SY Sycamore Public Library G X NP
TC Three Rivers Public Library District Y X X
UT United Township HS Dist #30
WA Walnut Public Library District
WD Western District Library G NP X
WL Wilmington Public Library District Y X X
YK Yorkville Public Library Y X X
PrairieCat Delegates Assembly Vote Tally - July 26, 201711
PrairieCat
Balance Sheet
As of 8/31/2017
MonthBalance End of
Assets
Cash & cash equivalents
Cash in Checking 978,350.88
PayPal Funds 567.12
Total Cash & cash equivalents 978,918.00
Accounts receivables 44,027.19
Other Receivables 30.00
Prepaid expenses 312,684.42
Capital Assets, net
Computers 549,510.41
Accumulated Depreciation (549,510.41)
Total Capital Assets, net 0.00
Total Assets 1,335,659.61
Liabilities
eCommerce Receipts Payable 9,591.41
Deferred revenue 115,178.33
Total Liabilities 124,769.74
Net Assets
Beginning Net Assets 1,194,667.94
Current YTD Net Income 16,221.93
Total Net Assets 1,210,889.87
Total Liabilities and Net Assets 1,335,659.61
12
PrairieCat
Statement of Revenues and Expenses - FY18 is 16.67% Completed
From 8/1/2017 Through 8/31/2017
Current Month YTD Actual OriginalYTD Budget -
YTD BudgetPercent of
OriginalTotal Budget -
Annual BudgetPercent of
REVENUES
Fees for Services and Materials
Union List Member Revenue
4,500.00 4,500.00 4,276.00 105.23% 25,650.00 17.54%
Fully Participating and Basic Online Member Revenue
63,029.59 126,059.18 128,156.00 98.36% 768,932.00 16.39%
ILL Barcode Revenue 1,600.00 1,600.00 1,250.00 128.00% 7,500.00 21.33%
Cataloging Revenue 0.00 0.00 84.00 0.00% 500.00 0.00%
Fully Participating & Basic Online - CR Contribution
3,412.51 6,825.02 6,908.00 98.79% 41,450.00 16.46%
Union List - CR Contribution
8,133.34 8,133.34 1,076.00 755.88% 6,460.00 125.90%
Total Fees for Services and Materials
80,675.44 147,117.54 141,750.00 103.79% 850,492.00 17.30%
Reimbursements
Reimbursements - eRead Illinois
0.00 0.00 7,500.00 0.00% 45,000.00 0.00%
Other 9,023.53 12,115.06 6,522.00 185.75% 39,120.00 30.96%
Total Reimbursements 9,023.53 12,115.06 14,022.00 86.40% 84,120.00 14.40%
Investment Income 217.45 442.63 416.00 106.40% 2,500.00 17.70%
Other
Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 166.00 0.00% 1,000.00 0.00%
Total Other 0.00 0.00 166.00 0.00% 1,000.00 0.00%
Total REVENUES 89,916.42 159,675.23 156,354.00 102.12% 938,112.00 17.02%
EXPENSES
Library Materials
E-Resources-eRead Illinois 0.00 0.00 7,500.00 0.00% 45,000.00 0.00%
Total Library Materials 0.00 0.00 7,500.00 0.00% 45,000.00 0.00%
Buildings and Grounds
Property Insurance 93.92 187.84 200.00 93.92% 1,200.00 15.65%
Total Buildings and Grounds 93.92 187.84 200.00 93.92% 1,200.00 15.65%
Travel and Continuing Education
In-State Travel 0.00 0.00 166.00 0.00% 1,000.00 0.00%
Out-Of-State Travel 0.00 0.00 834.00 0.00% 5,000.00 0.00%
Registrations And Meeting, Other Fees
68.30 1,460.55 1,500.00 97.37% 9,000.00 16.22%
Conferences And Continuing Education Meetings
0.00 0.00 1,542.00 0.00% 9,250.00 0.00%
Public Relations 0.00 0.00 84.00 0.00% 500.00 0.00%
Total Travel and Continuing Education
68.30 1,460.55 4,126.00 35.40% 24,750.00 5.90%
Commercial Insurance 338.83 677.66 916.00 73.98% 5,500.00 12.32%
Supplies, Postage and Printing
Computers, Software And Supplies
1,161.85 1,161.85 334.00 347.85% 2,000.00 58.09%
13
PrairieCat
Statement of Revenues and Expenses - FY18 is 16.67% Completed
From 8/1/2017 Through 8/31/2017
Current Month YTD Actual OriginalYTD Budget -
YTD BudgetPercent of
OriginalTotal Budget -
Annual BudgetPercent of
General Office Supplies And Equipment
0.00 2,452.86 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00%
Total Supplies, Postage and Printing
1,161.85 3,614.71 334.00 1,082.25% 2,000.00 180.74%
Equipment Repair and Maintenance
Equipment Repair And Maintenance Agreements
0.00 0.00 166.00 0.00% 1,000.00 0.00%
Total Equipment Repair and Maintenance
0.00 0.00 166.00 0.00% 1,000.00 0.00%
Professional Services
Legal 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.00% 3,000.00 0.00%
Accounting 0.00 0.00 834.00 0.00% 5,000.00 0.00%
Consulting 0.00 1,000.00 834.00 119.90% 5,000.00 20.00%
Total Professional Services 0.00 1,000.00 2,168.00 46.13% 13,000.00 7.69%
Contractual Services
Information Service Costs 29,407.79 64,561.53 66,204.00 97.51% 397,221.00 16.25%
Contract Agreements w/ Systems, Member Libraries Other Coops
35,582.56 71,165.12 71,166.00 99.99% 426,991.00 16.66%
Other Contractual Services
0.00 0.00 7,666.00 0.00% 46,000.00 0.00%
Total Contractual Services 64,990.35 135,726.65 145,036.00 93.58% 870,212.00 15.60%
Professional Association Membership Dues
0.00 41.46 26.00 159.46% 150.00 27.64%
Miscellaneous 62.00 130.50 166.00 78.61% 1,000.00 13.05%
Miscellaneous - eCommerce Fees
312.31 613.93 834.00 73.61% 5,000.00 12.27%
Total EXPENSES 67,027.56 143,453.30 161,472.00 88.84% 968,812.00 14.81%
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES OVER EXPENSES
22,888.86 16,221.93 (5,118.00) (316.95)% (30,700.00) (52.84)%
14
PrairieCat
Check/Voucher Register
1000 - Cash in Checking
From 8/24/2017 Through 9/23/2017
Vendor Name Effective Date Check Amount
Bank Orion 8/31/2017 60.00
Merchant eSolutions 9/5/2017 287.06
Amanda Standerfer 9/6/2017 4,900.00
Innovative Interfaces Inc 9/6/2017 1,050.00
Judith Hutchinson 9/6/2017 129.30
First Bankcard 9/6/2017 119.27
Advantage Advertising 9/13/2017 578.43
Marcive, Inc. 9/13/2017 252.12
Report Total 7,376.18
15
PrairieCat FY2018
Statistical Summary
July 2017 July 2016 Aug 2017 Aug 2016 Sept 2017 Sept 2016
1st Qtr
FY18 to
date
1st Qtr
FY17 to
date
% of
change
FY18 Totals
to date
FY17
Totals
FY16
Totals
% of
change
General
Bibliographic records 1,045,520 1,068,506 1,044,963 1,063,349 1,043,376 1,059,237 1,043,376 1,059,237 -1.50% 1,043,376 1,058,857 1,072,798 -1.30%
Item records 4,441,835 4,534,159 4,461,682 4,526,627 4,455,805 4,507,052 4,455,805 4,507,052 -1.14% 4,455,805 4,487,176 4,546,168 -1.30%
Patron records 355,401 370,597 359,086 373,360 364,347 376,919 364,347 376,919 -3.34% 364,347 372,793 372,556 0.06%
Total circulation 475,027 480,341 445,346 458,432 410,588 434,703 1,330,961 1,373,476 -3.10% 1,330,961 5,273,845 4,725,444 11.61%
ILL transactions on LLSAP 50,706 51,557 56,222 54,911 52,139 53,182 159,067 159,650 -0.37% 159,067 628,963 548,799 14.61%
Reciprocal borrowing 70,553 66,922 65,158 67,851 60,783 63,728 196,494 198,501 -1.01% 196,494 776,272 536,675 44.64%
Training, Outreach and Engagement
Training events 9 8 11 10 10 10 30 28 7.14% 30 110 130 -15.38%
Training participants 40 22 62 24 274 233 376 279 34.77% 376 588 634 -7.26%
Training contact hours 74 59 126 63 1,480 1,345 1,680 1,467 14.52% 1,680 2,197 1,673 31.29%
Site visits 3 2 9 6 5 10 17 18 -5.56% 17 105 53 98.11%
Member Meetings 3 5 7 5 2 3 12 13 -7.69% 12 59 41 43.90%
Meeting participants 104 118 93 50 25 27 222 195 13.85% 222 1,026 634 61.83%
Meeting contact hours 215 196 159 105 39 47 413 348 18.71% 413 2,210 1,673 32.11%
Troubleshooting
HelpDesk Calls Opened 165 93 264 138 247 139 676 370 82.70% 676 1,983 1,155 71.69%
HelpDesk Calls Closed 183 108 227 134 230 156 640 398 60.80% 640 2,025 1,100 84.09%
-
Database Enrichment -
Bibload records loaded - PC staff 1,736 1,660 1,038 2,158 1,809 1,051 4,583 4,869 -5.87% 4,583 22,051 26,118 -15.57%
Bibload records loaded - MARC catalogers 308 810 953 653 726 1,232 1,987 2,695 -26.27% 1,987 17,083 6,998 144.11%
Cleanup/overlays/merges - PC staff 15,578 1,961 123 3,375 354 2,331 16,055 7,667 109.40% 16,055 13,236 11,903 11.20%
Cleanup/overlays/merges - MARC
catalogers 851 2,728 1,796 3,403 806 971 3,453 7,102 -51.38% 3,453 13,230 5,966 121.76%
Enhancements/corrections - PC staff 23 13 3 21 26 20 52 54 -3.70% 52 303 289 4.84%
Enhancements/corrections - MARC
catalogers 2 31 11 6 1 10 14 47 -70.21% 14 157 60 161.67%
Authority records created/loaded - - - - - - - - #DIV/0! - - 56,172 -100.00%
Authority records removed - - - - - - - - #DIV/0! - - 977,254 -100.00%
Original catalogings - PC staff 40 17 21 28 25 15 86 60 43.33% 86 445 391 13.81%
Original catalogings - MARC catalogers 2 16 13 6 3 2 18 24 -25.00% 18 108 73 47.95%
Serial records created - - - - - - - - #DIV/0! - - - #DIV/0!
Special projects (ICode1 conversion,
Reclamation, etc) 220,131 64,298 22,888 95,510 83,774 64,419 326,793 224,227 45.74% 326,793 1,920,321 1,037,486 85.09%
Special projects (ICode1 conversion,
Reclamation, etc) - MARC catalogers - - - - - - - - #DIV/0! - 68 377 -81.96%
To see the full statistical spreadsheet, visit: https://support.prairiecat.info/sites/default/files/FY2017%20PC%20Statistics.pdf16
PUG Day Summary for Delegates Assembly
2017 was 4th annual PUG Day
134% growth in attendance since 2014
48% of PrairieCat members participated in 2017
At least nine members closed their libraries and made PUG Day their staff in-service
Overall evaluation score of 4.26 out of 5, with 55% of attendees completing evaluations
Average rating of 4.68 out of 5 to question: “I would attend PUG Day again if it continues as an
annual event.”
Average rating of 4.62 out of 5 to question: “I would recommend PUG Day to other staff at my
or other PrairieCat libraries.”
Total cost per attendee in 2017 was $32.46
Allowances included in
member fees
2017 attendance
2016 attendance
2015 attendance
2014 attendance
Total attendees 372 232 215 114 99
Total member libraries 127 131 124 126
# of libraries attending 61 62 49 46
% of libraries participating 48.03% 47.33% 39.52% 36.51%
Total fully participating members 318 72 72 65 64
# of fully participating libraries attending 53 49 42 40
% of fully participating libraries attending 73.61% 68.06% 64.62% 62.50%
Total basic online members 54 18 15 14 10
# of basic online libraries attending 6 8 5 4
% of basic online libraries attending 33.33% 53.33% 35.71% 40.00%
Total union list members 0 37 44 45 64
# of union list libraries attending 2 5 2 2
% of union list libraries attending 5.41% 11.36% 4.44% 3.13%
17
PrairieCat FY19 Draft Budget
Carolyn Coulter
October 25, 2017
More than two years ago, the Administrative Council began working toward staffing
independence from RAILS as a move toward further sustainability for PrairieCat. By
removing staff from RAILS and placing them directly under the direction of the PrairieCat
Administrative Council, PrairieCat becomes more independent and thus less reliant on state
funding should emergency arise. Staffing independence also gives PrairieCat members
more control over the direction of their organization, and much more control over its
administration. The Administrative Council and the Finance Committee have been working
hard toward a budget for FY19 that will provide for this independence. In doing so, they
have been very mindful of cost increases and tried to minimize impact on member budgets.
Even without staffing independence, members would realize a 5.85% increase in fees due to
the Innovative contract as well as general cost increases. Using that as a benchmark, the
Council and Finance committee began to build a budget incorporating independence costs.
PrairieCat was fortunate that LIMRiCC agreed to allow our membership for FY19. We were
also fortunate that RAILS was able to level fund us from FY18. With these savings in place,
we were able to minimize the costs to move to independence at an aggregate of 7.07% fee
increase to members. In order to level the impact of increases between larger and smaller
libraries, it was decided to increase the per library fee from $2,800 (FP) and $2,000 (BO) to
$3,000 (FP) and $2,100 (BO). Hosting fees were also increased from $300 (FP) and $210
(BO) to $400 (FP) and $280 (BO) in order to move closer to gradually absorbing those
costs. This solution moves PrairieCat to staffing independence and does not borrow or
contribute to capital reserves. Of course, this is a draft budget, but it is hoped that the
costs will remain stable and this percentile of increase will not change appreciably as we
move forward with further planning.
Attached below are three documents: the first is a proposed draft budget extending to FY22.
Cost increases for contracted services (such as the MyLibrary Mobile App and Mobile
Worklists) are included in projections for FY20 and beyond, however this does not account
for any other projects that the Assembly may decide to undertake in those years. It should
also be noted that a return to capital reserves savings is planned in FY20 and beyond.
The second document is the Appendix A for FY19, which reflects staffing independence as
described above, and shows the individual library impact as well as the aggregate cost
increases discussed. The third document is a comparison of costs to each library across the
last five years, from FY14 to FY19.
18
PC budget scenarios five years 20171005
FY18 FY19 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Final NO Independence Independence Indepdendence Independence Independence
Budget 0 Cap reserve 0 Cap Reserve 25K Reserves 25K Reserves 25K Reserves
REVENUES
4062 Union List Member Revenue $25,650 $24,975.00 $24,975.00 $24,975.00 $24,975.00 $24,975.00
4063 Fully Participating & Basic Online Member Revenue $768,932 $816,091.00 $824,965.78 $905,437.92 $993,301.83 $1,016,696.51
4064 ILL Barcode Revenue $7,500 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00
4065 Cataloging Revenue $500 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00
4067 Fully Participating & Basic Online - CR Contribution $41,450 $42,150.00 $42,150.00 $42,150.00 $42,150.00 $42,150.00
4068 Union List - CR Contribution $6,460 $6,290.00 $6,290.00 $6,290.00 $6,290.00 $6,290.00
4070 Reimbursements $1,500 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
reimburse for express lane and marc
report
4071 Reimbursements - Hosting fee $24,870 $33,720.00 $33,720.00 $35,330.00 $37,096.50 $38,951.33 added flat hosting fee
4073 Reimbursements - PUG Day/DA Fee $12,750 $16,000 $16,000 $16,000 $16,560 $16,891 $6,000 DA; $10,000 PUG Day
4080 Investment Income $2,500 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00
4090 Other Revenue $1,000 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
Revenue from RAILS (FY18 Award) $0 $0 $588,542.00 $588,542.00 $588,542.00 $588,542.00
TOTAL REVENUE $893,112 $951,726.00 $1,549,142.78 $1,631,224.92 $1,721,415.33 $1,746,996.04
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Wages, ALL professionals $0.00 $0.00 $719,888.91 $734,286.69 $748,972.42 $763,951.87
Part Time on-boarding hours $0.00 $0.00 $22,704.24 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$49.79/hour, 19 hours/week, 24
weeks to onboard new staff
Payroll taxes, SS taxes, fringe benefits $0.00 $0.00 $61,891.67 $63,129.50 $64,392.09 $65,679.94
includes wellness ($2,200), Longevity
($2,700), Retirement gifts ($1,000)
and tutition reimbursement ($2,000)
Unemployment Insurance $0.00 $0.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00
Adding funds to cover RAILS
underage, FY17
Worker's Compensation insurance $0.00 $0.00 $1,442.00 $1,442.00 $1,442.00 $1,442.00
Retirement benefits $0.00 $0.00 $71,988.89 $73,428.67 $74,897.24 $76,395.19 10% employer contribution
Health, Dental, Life $0.00 $0.00 $113,742.07 $119,429.17 $125,400.63 $131,670.66
LIMRiCC numbers from RAILS FY18
(106301) +7%
5160 Property Insurance $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00
5250 In-State Travel $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00
5260 Out-of-State Travel $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $15,500.00 $15,500.00 $15,500.00 $15,500.00
5270 Registration & Meetings, Other Fees $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00
5280 Conferences and Continuing Education Meetings $9,250.00 $9,250.00 $16,000.00 $16,560.00 $16,560.00 $17,139.60 PUG, DA
5290 Public relations $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
5300 Liability Insurance $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00
5310 Computer, Software & Supplies $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00
5400 Equipment Repair & Maintenance Agreements $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
5410 Legal $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00
5420 Accounting $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
5430 Consulting $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
potentially needed for Independence
planning, also market/branding
planning
5450 Information Service Costs $397,221.00 $418,460.00 $418,460.00 $473,293.89 $489,620.94 $505,557.78
Innovative software maintenance,
enriched content, MARCIVE, Novelist,
OCLC fees.
10/13/2017 19
PC budget scenarios five years 20171005
FY18 FY19 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Final NO Independence Independence Indepdendence Independence Independence
Budget 0 Cap reserve 0 Cap Reserve 25K Reserves 25K Reserves 25K Reserves
5460 Contractual Agreements w/Systems, Member Libraries & Other Cooperatives $426,991.00 $426,991.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Contract with RAILS for services .
Includes staff costs in FY18. After
FY19, excludes staff. Includes:
facilities, IT/datacenter, vehicle use,
telephone and telecom, finance dept
5470 Outside Printing services $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00
5480 Other Contractual Services $46,000.00 $53,175.00 $53,175.00 $54,805.00 $105,280.00 $90,309.00
hosting, other contracts (1K), paycom
costs ($5,600)
5500 Professional Association Membership Dues $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00
5510 Miscellaneous $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
5520 Miscellaneous - E-Commerce Fees $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $923,812.00 $951,726.00 $1,549,142.78 $1,606,224.92 $1,696,415.33 $1,721,996.04
Change in net position -$30,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 To Cap. Reserves
10/13/2017 20
Independence 0K 20171005
Fully Participating & Basic Online Library Fees, July
2018 to June 2019 $824,966
CIRC FORMULA - balance divided by 3 $190,688.59 / 5,648,229 Circs = $0.03376
USER FORMULA - balance divided by 3 $190,688.59 / 384,438 Users = $0.49602
ITEMS FORMULA - balance divided by 3 $190,688.59 / 4,128,922 Items = $0.04618
LIBRARY FORMULA - $3000 for FP; $2100 for basic $252,900.00 / 86 Libraries $252,900.00
Capital Reserve: $500 for FP; $350 for Basic
FY18 Per Per Per Per CR DA/PUG Day Hosting Fee FY19 $ %Library total fees Circs Circ chg Users user chg Items item charge library Contribution Reimbursement total fees Inc/Dec Inc/Dec
Andalusia TL (AN) $3,515.06 5,805 $195.98 341 $169.14 13,112 $605.56 $2,100.00 $350.00 $48.49 $280.00 $3,749.17 $234.11 6.66%
Bertolet ML (BM) $3,698.68 10,908 $368.26 389 $192.95 13,005 $600.62 $2,100.00 $350.00 $53.12 $280.00 $3,944.96 $246.28 6.66%
Bourbonnais PL (BD) $13,902.24 112,217 $3,788.53 9,705 $4,813.87 45,057 $2,080.90 $3,000.00 $500.00 $283.87 $400.00 $14,867.16 $964.92 6.94%
Bradley PL (BR) $10,943.16 77,529 $2,617.44 5,524 $2,740.01 48,727 $2,250.39 $3,000.00 $500.00 $209.29 $400.00 $11,717.13 $773.97 7.07%
Byron PLD (BY) $11,727.57 88,852 $2,999.71 4,615 $2,289.13 67,852 $3,133.65 $3,000.00 $500.00 $228.98 $400.00 $12,551.47 $823.90 7.03%
Charles B. Phillips PL (Newark) (CP) $5,448.88 20,926 $706.48 884 $438.48 16,348 $755.01 $3,000.00 $500.00 $71.01 $400.00 $5,870.98 $422.10 7.75%
Clinton Township PLD (CT) $5,559.72 22,420 $756.92 998 $495.03 16,526 $763.23 $3,000.00 $500.00 $73.80 $400.00 $5,988.98 $429.26 7.72%
Coal City PL (CC) $14,769.00 135,129 $4,562.06 6,143 $3,047.05 86,062 $3,974.66 $3,000.00 $500.00 $305.56 $400.00 $15,789.32 $1,020.32 6.91%
Colona District Library (CL) $7,484.16 36,501 $1,232.30 3,024 $1,499.96 27,749 $1,281.55 $3,000.00 $500.00 $122.22 $400.00 $8,036.04 $551.88 7.37%
Cordova PL (CO) $5,556.54 17,395 $587.27 627 $311.00 24,094 $1,112.75 $3,000.00 $500.00 $73.68 $400.00 $5,984.70 $428.16 7.71%
Cortland PL (CN) $7,766.50 65,957 $2,226.76 1,638 $812.48 27,517 $1,270.83 $3,000.00 $500.00 $129.41 $400.00 $8,339.48 $572.98 7.38%
Creston-Dement PL (CR) $3,677.69 8,753 $295.51 325 $161.21 14,924 $689.24 $2,100.00 $350.00 $45.23 $280.00 $3,921.19 $243.50 6.62%
DeKalb PL (DK) $27,777.18 288,065 $9,725.30 18,067 $8,961.58 138,876 $6,413.80 $3,000.00 $500.00 $633.10 $400.00 $29,633.78 $1,856.60 6.68%
Earlville PL (EA) $4,523.17 19,126 $645.71 1,122 $556.53 17,671 $816.11 $2,100.00 $350.00 $73.88 $280.00 $4,822.23 $299.06 6.61%
East Dubuque PL (EP) $6,091.64 26,589 $897.67 1,367 $678.06 21,476 $991.84 $3,000.00 $500.00 $87.18 $400.00 $6,554.74 $463.10 7.60%
East Moline PL (EM) $14,369.11 98,025 $3,309.40 9,602 $4,762.78 66,978 $3,093.29 $3,000.00 $500.00 $295.48 $400.00 $15,360.95 $991.84 6.90%
Elizabeth TL (EL) $4,458.89 5,952 $200.94 447 $221.72 9,708 $448.35 $3,000.00 $500.00 $46.09 $400.00 $4,817.10 $358.21 8.03%
Ella Johnson Memorial PL (EJ) $13,686.74 114,612 $3,869.39 7,686 $3,812.40 60,139 $2,777.44 $3,000.00 $500.00 $278.38 $400.00 $14,637.61 $950.87 6.95%
Erie PL (ER) $6,032.36 14,559 $491.52 1,212 $601.18 30,566 $1,411.65 $3,000.00 $500.00 $85.61 $400.00 $6,489.96 $457.60 7.59%
Flagg-Rochelle PLD (FL) $9,927.56 58,032 $1,959.21 5,140 $2,549.54 44,236 $2,042.98 $3,000.00 $500.00 $183.70 $400.00 $10,635.42 $707.86 7.13%
Fossil Ridge PL (Braidwood) (FR) $12,297.47 90,236 $3,046.44 6,482 $3,215.20 59,608 $2,752.91 $3,000.00 $500.00 $243.36 $400.00 $13,157.91 $860.44 7.00%
Franklin Grove PLD (FG) $5,440.65 13,771 $464.92 668 $331.34 23,690 $1,094.09 $3,000.00 $500.00 $70.75 $400.00 $5,861.10 $420.45 7.73%
Freeport PLD (FP) $22,796.57 176,350 $5,953.71 13,939 $6,914.01 152,660 $7,050.39 $3,000.00 $500.00 $507.40 $400.00 $24,325.52 $1,528.95 6.71%
Galena PLD (GA) $7,473.71 51,293 $1,731.69 2,336 $1,158.70 24,128 $1,114.32 $3,000.00 $500.00 $122.01 $400.00 $8,026.72 $553.01 7.40%
Geneseo PL (GP) $13,274.20 103,925 $3,508.59 5,940 $2,946.35 77,391 $3,574.20 $3,000.00 $500.00 $267.90 $400.00 $14,197.04 $922.84 6.95%
Genoa PL (GE) $6,682.05 29,278 $988.45 2,108 $1,045.61 24,825 $1,146.51 $3,000.00 $500.00 $102.03 $400.00 $7,182.59 $500.54 7.49%
Grant Park PL (GR) $3,743.21 2,540 $85.75 1,328 $658.71 10,156 $469.04 $2,100.00 $350.00 $46.89 $280.00 $3,990.39 $247.18 6.60%
Graves-Hume PL (Mendota) (GV) $7,816.43 30,579 $1,032.37 3,029 $1,502.44 39,468 $1,822.78 $3,000.00 $500.00 $130.52 $400.00 $8,388.11 $571.68 7.31%
Hanover TL (HN) $3,705.12 9,976 $336.80 575 $285.21 11,967 $552.68 $2,100.00 $350.00 $45.94 $280.00 $3,950.63 $245.51 6.63%
Henry C Adams ML (HE) $4,002.57 7,705 $260.13 1,099 $545.12 14,677 $677.84 $2,100.00 $350.00 $53.41 $280.00 $4,266.50 $263.93 6.59%
Highland Community College (HC) $8,023.89 10,190 $344.02 3,103 $1,539.15 58,176 $2,686.78 $3,000.00 $500.00 $135.60 $400.00 $8,605.55 $581.66 7.25%
Hinckley PLD (HK) $4,736.43 25,259 $852.76 1,153 $571.91 17,797 $821.93 $2,100.00 $350.00 $71.91 $280.00 $5,048.51 $312.08 6.59%
Homer PL (HD) $21,109.25 192,198 $6,488.75 14,866 $7,373.82 93,286 $4,308.29 $3,000.00 $500.00 $465.24 $400.00 $22,536.10 $1,426.85 6.76%
Johnsburg PL (JO) $13,594.87 95,643 $3,228.98 8,926 $4,427.47 58,580 $2,705.44 $3,000.00 $500.00 $276.03 $400.00 $14,537.91 $943.04 6.94%
Joliet Township HS (JC) $9,843.82 18,839 $636.02 8,123 $4,029.16 38,880 $1,795.62 $3,000.00 $500.00 $181.51 $400.00 $10,542.31 $698.49 7.10%
Julia Hull PL (Stillman Valley) (JH) $8,050.09 53,241 $1,797.46 2,982 $1,479.13 28,721 $1,326.44 $3,000.00 $500.00 $136.50 $400.00 $8,639.53 $589.44 7.32%
Kankakee PL (KK) $16,935.39 90,994 $3,072.03 12,635 $6,267.20 97,178 $4,488.03 $3,000.00 $500.00 $359.92 $400.00 $18,087.18 $1,151.79 6.80%
LaSalle PL (LS) $10,678.19 68,489 $2,312.24 3,349 $1,661.17 72,697 $3,357.41 $3,000.00 $500.00 $202.49 $400.00 $11,433.31 $755.12 7.07%
Lena CL (LE) $6,677.65 23,492 $793.11 2,752 $1,365.04 22,028 $1,017.33 $3,000.00 $500.00 $101.92 $400.00 $7,177.40 $499.75 7.48%
Limestone PL (LI) $6,223.69 24,076 $812.82 1,880 $932.52 20,766 $959.05 $3,000.00 $500.00 $90.50 $400.00 $6,694.89 $471.20 7.57%
Malta Township PL (ML) $5,062.37 12,675 $427.92 870 $431.54 13,826 $638.53 $3,000.00 $500.00 $61.27 $400.00 $5,459.26 $396.89 7.84%
Manhattan PL (MT) $11,825.46 97,819 $3,302.45 5,539 $2,747.45 53,607 $2,475.77 $3,000.00 $500.00 $231.53 $400.00 $12,657.19 $831.73 7.03%
Manteno PL (MN) $12,446.58 90,730 $3,063.12 6,353 $3,151.21 63,981 $2,954.87 $3,000.00 $500.00 $247.09 $400.00 $13,316.29 $869.71 6.99%
Maple Park PL (MP) $4,763.29 4,744 $160.16 633 $313.98 15,427 $712.47 $3,000.00 $500.00 $53.72 $400.00 $5,140.33 $377.04 7.92%
Marseilles PL (MB) $0.00 15,776 $532.61 2,151 $1,066.94 21,530 $994.33 $2,100.00 $350.00 $80.32 $280.00 $5,404.20 $5,404.20 0.00%
Meridian Schools (Stillman Valley) (MS) $8,040.10 57,086 $1,927.27 2,031 $1,007.41 35,902 $1,658.08 $3,000.00 $500.00 $136.23 $400.00 $8,629.00 $588.90 7.32%
Mokena PL (MK) $16,959.28 146,859 $4,958.07 9,245 $4,585.70 93,420 $4,314.47 $3,000.00 $500.00 $360.68 $400.00 $18,118.93 $1,159.65 6.84%
Moline PL (MX) $34,165.83 350,621 $11,837.24 21,455 $10,642.09 200,439 $9,257.00 $3,000.00 $500.00 $793.78 $400.00 $36,430.11 $2,264.28 6.63%
Morris Area PL (MR) $15,273.02 141,755 $4,785.76 8,818 $4,373.90 63,852 $2,948.92 $3,000.00 $500.00 $318.36 $400.00 $16,326.93 $1,053.91 6.90%
Mt. Morris PL (MM) $5,266.27 25,813 $871.47 1,363 $676.07 27,038 $1,248.71 $2,100.00 $350.00 $85.20 $280.00 $5,611.46 $345.19 6.55%
New Lenox PL (NL) $26,838.26 266,717 $9,004.57 16,814 $8,340.07 146,779 $6,778.79 $3,000.00 $500.00 $609.38 $400.00 $28,632.81 $1,794.55 6.69%
Odell PL (OD) $7,144.51 30,764 $1,038.62 1,385 $686.99 41,886 $1,934.45 $3,000.00 $500.00 $113.60 $400.00 $7,673.65 $529.14 7.41%
Oglesby PL (OG) $6,585.44 25,685 $867.15 2,181 $1,081.82 24,488 $1,130.94 $3,000.00 $500.00 $99.59 $400.00 $7,079.50 $494.06 7.50%
Oregon PLD (OR) $7,457.17 44,752 $1,510.86 2,226 $1,104.14 29,699 $1,371.61 $3,000.00 $500.00 $121.56 $400.00 $8,008.16 $550.99 7.39%
Pearl City PLD (PP) $4,888.45 8,462 $285.68 760 $376.97 14,168 $654.33 $3,000.00 $500.00 $56.88 $400.00 $5,273.87 $385.42 7.88%
Pecatonica PL (PT) $6,254.40 32,085 $1,083.21 1,647 $816.94 18,125 $837.08 $3,000.00 $500.00 $91.30 $400.00 $6,728.54 $474.14 7.58%
Peotone PL (PE) $11,028.29 60,764 $2,051.44 5,628 $2,791.60 61,728 $2,850.82 $3,000.00 $500.00 $211.33 $400.00 $11,805.19 $776.90 7.04%
Peru PL (PU) $9,414.38 74,875 $2,527.84 3,399 $1,685.97 39,132 $1,807.26 $3,000.00 $500.00 $170.85 $400.00 $10,091.91 $677.53 7.20%
Plano Community PL (PD) $13,502.27 116,343 $3,927.83 7,432 $3,686.41 57,462 $2,653.80 $3,000.00 $500.00 $273.76 $400.00 $14,441.81 $939.54 6.96%
Plano CUSD (PX) $9,385.86 58,174 $1,964.00 3,517 $1,744.50 49,384 $2,280.73 $3,000.00 $500.00 $170.04 $400.00 $10,059.27 $673.41 7.17%
Polo PLD (PO) $4,813.90 26,222 $885.28 1,210 $600.18 18,224 $841.65 $2,100.00 $350.00 $73.86 $280.00 $5,130.97 $317.07 6.59%
Princeton PL (PR) $10,960.36 65,806 $2,221.66 4,263 $2,114.53 71,179 $3,287.30 $3,000.00 $500.00 $209.59 $400.00 $11,733.09 $772.73 7.05%
Princeton Township HS (PF) $3,413.92 5,683 $191.86 692 $343.25 7,298 $337.05 $2,100.00 $350.00 $38.62 $280.00 $3,640.78 $226.86 6.65%
Prophetstown-Lyndon-Tampico Schools (TW) $5,512.28 17,612 $594.59 1,101 $546.12 35,955 $1,660.53 $2,100.00 $350.00 $85.29 $280.00 $5,616.54 $104.26 1.89%
Putnam County Schools (UC) $4,439.62 4,541 $153.31 497 $246.52 9,766 $451.03 $3,000.00 $500.00 $45.60 $400.00 $4,796.45 $356.83 8.04%
Putnam County PL (UE) $7,376.50 36,947 $1,247.36 2,086 $1,034.70 35,072 $1,619.75 $3,000.00 $500.00 $119.48 $400.00 $7,921.29 $544.79 7.39%
Reddick PL (Ottawa) (RL) $15,438.98 153,281 $5,174.89 7,899 $3,918.05 69,049 $3,188.93 $3,000.00 $500.00 $322.54 $400.00 $16,504.42 $1,065.44 6.90%
Richard A Mautino PL (MA) $5,952.04 29,308 $989.46 1,634 $810.50 36,985 $1,708.10 $2,100.00 $350.00 $102.43 $280.00 $6,340.49 $388.45 6.53%
River Valley DL (RD) $7,938.16 54,016 $1,823.62 2,256 $1,119.02 33,179 $1,532.33 $3,000.00 $500.00 $147.46 $400.00 $8,522.43 $584.27 7.36%
Robert R Jones DL (CV) $8,482.45 33,338 $1,125.52 3,644 $1,807.49 45,816 $2,115.95 $3,000.00 $500.00 $147.26 $400.00 $9,096.22 $613.77 7.24%
Robert Rowe PL (Sheridan) (RO) $5,555.63 18,699 $631.29 1,201 $595.72 16,965 $783.51 $3,000.00 $500.00 $73.69 $400.00 $5,984.20 $428.57 7.71%
Rock Island PL (RP) $28,330.27 221,198 $7,467.82 16,649 $8,258.22 215,192 $9,938.35 $3,000.00 $500.00 $646.51 $400.00 $30,210.90 $1,880.63 6.64%
Sandwich PLD (SA) $8,441.74 52,714 $1,779.67 3,449 $1,710.77 32,888 $1,518.89 $3,000.00 $500.00 $146.34 $400.00 $9,055.66 $613.92 7.27%
Schmaling ML (SC) $4,589.89 17,118 $577.92 1,037 $514.37 21,678 $1,001.17 $2,100.00 $350.00 $68.18 $280.00 $4,891.64 $301.75 6.57%
Seneca PL (SE) $8,934.59 28,908 $975.96 2,386 $1,183.50 72,693 $3,357.23 $3,000.00 $500.00 $158.51 $400.00 $9,575.19 $640.60 7.17%
Serena Schools (CF) $4,396.70 15,054 $508.23 739 $366.56 22,040 $1,017.89 $2,100.00 $350.00 $63.31 $280.00 $4,685.99 $289.29 6.58%
21
Independence 0K 20171005
Sherrard PL (SD) $6,452.51 24,287 $819.95 1,633 $810.00 28,401 $1,311.66 $3,000.00 $500.00 $96.22 $400.00 $6,937.83 $485.32 7.52%
Silvis PL (SL) $7,491.39 35,032 $1,182.71 3,407 $1,689.94 24,871 $1,148.63 $3,000.00 $500.00 $122.41 $400.00 $8,043.69 $552.30 7.37%
Somonauk PL (SN) $10,201.64 76,530 $2,583.71 4,577 $2,270.28 42,965 $1,984.28 $3,000.00 $500.00 $190.65 $400.00 $10,928.92 $727.28 7.13%
South Beloit PLD (SB) $6,085.80 17,049 $575.59 2,172 $1,077.35 19,652 $907.60 $3,000.00 $500.00 $87.01 $400.00 $6,547.56 $461.76 7.59%
Stockton TL (SK) $4,260.05 11,522 $388.99 765 $379.45 21,264 $982.05 $2,100.00 $350.00 $59.87 $280.00 $4,540.36 $280.31 6.58%
Streator PL (SR) $8,824.47 38,609 $1,303.47 3,912 $1,940.43 46,783 $2,160.61 $3,000.00 $500.00 $155.88 $400.00 $9,460.38 $635.91 7.21%
Sycamore PL (SY) $17,882.42 202,603 $6,840.03 8,544 $4,237.99 81,089 $3,744.98 $3,000.00 $500.00 $384.11 $400.00 $19,107.12 $1,224.70 6.85%
Three Rivers PL (Channahon/Minooka) (TC) $19,463.73 185,198 $6,252.43 11,667 $5,787.05 95,758 $4,422.45 $3,000.00 $500.00 $423.80 $400.00 $20,785.74 $1,322.01 6.79%
United Township HS (E. Moline) (UT) $7,675.70 29,054 $980.89 2,565 $1,272.29 42,397 $1,958.05 $3,000.00 $500.00 $126.96 $400.00 $8,238.18 $562.48 7.33%
Walnut PLD (WA) $4,709.96 21,287 $718.67 725 $359.61 24,687 $1,140.14 $2,100.00 $350.00 $71.20 $280.00 $5,019.62 $309.66 6.57%
Warren Township PL (WR) $3,811.62 8,806 $297.30 745 $369.53 13,532 $624.96 $2,100.00 $350.00 $48.77 $280.00 $4,070.56 $258.94 6.79%
Western Dist PL (Orion) (WD) $6,561.15 22,877 $772.35 2,048 $1,015.85 27,414 $1,266.08 $3,000.00 $500.00 $98.96 $400.00 $7,053.23 $492.08 7.50%
Wilmington PL (WL) $10,909.38 94,949 $3,205.55 4,491 $2,227.62 46,371 $2,141.58 $3,000.00 $500.00 $208.50 $400.00 $11,683.25 $773.87 7.09%
Yorkville PL (YK) $12,584.39 92,056 $3,107.88 6,868 $3,406.66 60,584 $2,797.99 $3,000.00 $500.00 $250.58 $400.00 $13,463.11 $878.72 6.98%
TOTALS $851,813.57 5,648,229 $190,688.59 384,438 $190,688.59 4,128,922 $190,688.59 $252,900.00 $42,150.00 $15,999.99 $33,720.00 $916,835.77 $65,022.20 7.07%
$824,965.78
22
Appendix A Comparisons FY14 to FY19 20171010
FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 $ %fees fees fees fees fees fees Inc/Dec Inc/Dec
LibraryAdded Basic
Online, Novelist Incorporated OCLC
Incorporated
DA lunch and
PUG Day fees
New III
contract
Staff
independence
0K reserves
Andalusia TL (AN) $0.00 $4,082.92 $4,146.16 $3,654.61 $3,515.47 $3,749.17 -$333.75 -8.17%
Bertolet ML (BM) $0.00 $3,450.65 $3,484.59 $3,401.03 $3,699.17 $3,944.96 $494.31 14.33%
Bourbonnais PL (BD) $15,436.98 $14,923.03 $15,476.89 $13,912.67 $13,906.75 $14,867.16 -$569.82 -3.69%
Bradley PL (BR) $11,812.57 $11,798.66 $12,107.41 $10,948.92 $10,946.37 $11,717.13 -$95.44 -0.81%
Byron PLD (BY) $12,350.59 $12,041.30 $12,419.41 $11,473.37 $11,731.13 $12,551.47 $200.88 1.63%
Charles B. Phillips PL (Newark) (CP) $5,237.42 $4,978.51 $5,176.11 $4,975.62 $5,449.68 $5,870.98 $633.56 12.10%
Clinton Township PLD (CT) $5,495.99 $5,093.60 $5,337.35 $5,085.40 $5,560.57 $5,988.98 $492.99 8.97%
Coal City PL (CC) $16,012.31 $15,834.07 $16,465.12 $14,926.04 $14,773.90 $15,789.32 -$222.99 -1.39%
Colona District Library (CL) $7,596.66 $7,326.13 $7,646.25 $7,123.85 $7,485.85 $8,036.04 $439.38 5.78%
Cordova PL (CO) $5,334.23 $5,296.91 $5,427.42 $5,221.23 $5,557.39 $5,984.70 $650.47 12.19%
Cortland PL (CN) $7,954.94 $7,491.52 $7,907.24 $7,381.52 $7,768.32 $8,339.48 $384.54 4.83%
Creston-Dement PL (CR) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,498.89 $3,678.17 $3,921.19 $422.30 12.07%
DeKalb PL (DK) $29,123.71 $28,939.00 $30,330.29 $27,584.79 $27,787.78 $29,633.78 $510.07 1.75%
Earlville PL (EA) $5,325.72 $4,438.70 $4,488.74 $4,297.58 $4,524.02 $4,822.23 -$503.49 -9.45%
East Dubuque Public Library (EP) $6,185.85 $6,379.88 $6,135.58 $5,849.26 $6,092.73 $6,554.74 $368.89 5.96%
East Moline Public Library $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13,828.43 $14,373.83 $15,360.95 $1,532.52 11.08%
Elizabeth TL (EL) $0.00 $4,233.47 $4,248.02 $4,119.01 $4,459.26 $4,817.10 $583.63 13.79%
Ella Johnson Memorial PL (EJ) $13,556.52 $13,126.40 $13,783.21 $12,864.02 $13,691.16 $14,637.61 $1,081.09 7.97%
Erie PL (ER) $5,655.42 $5,604.31 $5,731.90 $5,539.40 $6,033.42 $6,489.96 $834.54 14.76%
Flagg-Rochelle PLD (FL) $10,554.03 $10,091.59 $10,496.72 $9,608.50 $9,930.33 $10,635.42 $81.39 0.77%
Fossil Ridge PL (Braidwood) (FR) $13,746.30 $13,277.89 $13,780.37 $12,531.53 $12,301.28 $13,157.91 -$588.39 -4.28%
Franklin Grove PLD (FG) $5,009.31 $5,057.82 $5,144.37 $5,009.19 $5,441.45 $5,861.10 $851.79 17.00%
Freeport PLD (FP) $24,105.35 $23,915.47 $24,719.41 $22,607.92 $22,804.98 $24,325.52 $220.17 0.91%
Galena PLD (GA) $7,187.05 $7,112.12 $7,342.38 $7,010.87 $7,475.40 $8,026.72 $839.67 11.68%
Geneseo PL (GP) $13,450.10 $13,668.18 $14,049.30 $13,086.95 $13,278.44 $14,197.04 $746.94 5.55%
Genoa PL (GE) $6,650.51 $6,168.03 $6,517.87 $6,129.63 $6,683.40 $7,182.59 $532.08 8.00%
Grant Park PL (GR) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,413.85 $3,743.73 $3,990.39 $576.54 16.89%
Graves-Hume PL (Mendota) (GV) $8,254.92 $7,882.88 $8,141.74 $7,505.62 $7,818.27 $8,388.11 $133.19 1.61%
Hanover TL (HN) $0.00 $0.00 $3,512.25 $3,420.12 $3,705.61 $3,950.63 $438.38 $0.12
Henry C Adams ML $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,697.78 $4,003.20 $4,266.50 $568.72 15.38%
Highland Community College (HC) $8,924.28 $8,388.87 $8,686.91 $7,868.15 $8,025.82 $8,605.55 -$318.73 -3.57%
Hinckley PLD (HK) $5,871.21 $4,754.07 $4,861.57 $4,504.49 $4,737.38 $5,048.51 -$822.70 -14.01%
Homer PL (HD) $23,253.52 $21,367.92 $23,216.48 $20,823.19 $21,116.93 $22,536.10 -$717.42 -3.09%
Johnsburg PL (JO) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13,599.25 $14,537.91 $938.66 6.90%
Joliet Township HS (JC) $9,746.72 $9,637.47 $9,985.89 $9,623.32 $9,846.56 $10,542.31 $904.84 8.16%
Julia Hull PL (Stillman Valley) (JH) $8,403.34 $8,277.52 $8,487.89 $7,868.50 $8,052.04 $8,639.53 $236.19 2.81%
Kankakee PL (KK) $18,102.42 $18,074.67 $18,662.21 $16,931.56 $16,941.23 $18,087.18 -$15.24 -0.08%
LaSalle PL (LS) $10,814.43 $10,472.13 $11,023.54 $10,263.33 $10,681.28 $11,433.31 $618.88 5.72%
Lena CL (LE) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,167.93 $6,678.99 $7,177.40 $1,009.47 16.37%
Limestone PL (LI) $6,653.76 $6,168.33 $6,456.37 $5,951.83 $6,224.84 $6,694.89 $41.13 0.62%
Malta Township PL (ML) $5,192.04 $4,779.41 $4,954.47 $4,681.64 $5,063.01 $5,459.26 $267.22 5.15%
Manhattan PL (MT) $13,068.43 $12,704.39 $12,801.11 $11,571.40 $11,829.06 $12,657.19 -$411.24 -3.15%
Manteno PL (MN) $13,169.57 $12,319.10 $13,203.88 $12,175.78 $12,450.46 $13,316.29 $146.72 1.11%
Maple Park PL (MP) $4,620.99 $4,545.87 $4,624.97 $4,434.17 $4,763.79 $5,140.33 $519.34 11.24%
Marseilles PL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,404.20 $0.00 0.00%
Meridian Schools (Stillman Valley) (MS) $8,147.65 $8,383.24 $8,393.68 $7,902.08 $8,042.04 $8,629.00 $481.35 5.91%
Mokena PL (MK) $19,439.11 $17,612.09 $18,881.07 $16,792.29 $16,965.13 $18,118.93 -$1,320.18 -6.79%
Moline PL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $34,306.52 $34,179.23 $36,430.11 $2,123.59 6.19%
Morris Area PL (MR) $17,225.07 $16,926.89 $17,393.93 $15,490.04 $15,278.13 $16,326.93 -$898.14 -5.21%
Mt. Morris PL (MM) $0.00 $5,157.30 $5,402.32 $5,078.16 $5,267.45 $5,611.46 $454.16 8.81%
New Lenox PL (NL) $28,172.54 $28,370.90 $29,313.14 $26,804.17 $26,848.44 $28,632.81 $460.27 0.92%
Odell PL (OD) $7,874.89 $8,153.25 $7,725.34 $7,080.65 $7,146.06 $7,673.65 -$201.24 -2.56%
Oglesby PL (OG) $6,241.96 $6,214.68 $6,370.98 $6,144.25 $6,586.74 $7,079.50 $837.54 13.42%
Oregon PLD (OR) $7,944.52 $7,707.93 $7,977.24 $7,323.62 $7,458.85 $8,008.16 $63.64 0.80%
23
Appendix A Comparisons FY14 to FY19 20171010
FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 $ %fees fees fees fees fees fees Inc/Dec Inc/Dec
LibraryAdded Basic
Online, Novelist Incorporated OCLC
Incorporated
DA lunch and
PUG Day fees
New III
contract
Staff
independence
0K reserves
Pearl City PLD (PP) $4,447.81 $4,484.99 $4,533.92 $4,459.24 $4,889.01 $5,273.87 $826.06 18.57%
Pecatonica PL (PT) $5,789.42 $5,990.40 $6,060.23 $5,893.90 $6,255.55 $6,728.54 $939.12 16.22%
Peotone PL (PE) $10,959.09 $11,385.29 $11,507.59 $10,761.74 $11,031.54 $11,805.19 $846.10 7.72%
Peru PL (PU) $9,827.46 $9,751.10 $9,912.97 $9,188.16 $9,416.92 $10,091.91 $264.45 2.69%
Plano Community PL (PD) $14,316.87 $14,142.66 $14,556.10 $13,383.73 $13,506.61 $14,441.81 $124.94 0.87%
Plano CUSD (PX) $8,819.63 $9,216.85 $9,327.08 $8,925.89 $9,388.39 $10,059.27 $1,239.64 14.06%
Polo PLD (PO) $6,099.25 $4,737.58 $4,949.37 $4,573.27 $4,814.89 $5,130.97 -$968.28 -15.88%
Princeton PL (PR) $11,366.96 $11,113.92 $11,512.24 $10,659.31 $10,963.58 $11,733.09 $366.13 3.22%
Princeton Township HS (PF) $4,100.02 $3,154.67 $3,199.04 $3,125.68 $3,414.29 $3,640.78 -$459.24 -11.20%
Prophetstown-Lyndon-Tampico Schools (TW) $5,775.16 $5,021.03 $5,141.77 $4,991.03 $5,273.47 $5,616.54 -$158.62 -2.75%
Putnam County Schools (UC) $4,043.51 $4,082.93 $4,075.00 $4,030.32 $4,439.98 $4,796.45 $752.94 18.62%
Putnam County PL (UE) $7,864.88 $7,455.47 $7,595.09 $7,052.50 $7,378.15 $7,921.29 $56.41 0.72%
Reddick PL (Ottawa) (RL) $16,276.63 $16,285.29 $16,829.99 $15,398.53 $15,444.17 $16,504.42 $227.79 1.40%
Richard A Mautino PL (MA) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,613.05 $5,953.52 $6,340.49 $727.44 12.96%
River Valley DL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7,521.33 $7,940.05 $8,522.43 $1,001.10 13.31%
Robert R Jones DL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8,394.33 $8,484.59 $9,096.22 $701.89 8.36%
Robert Rowe PL (Sheridan) (RO) $5,494.74 $5,277.05 $5,426.98 $5,154.23 $5,556.48 $5,984.20 $489.46 8.91%
Rock Island PL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $27,972.77 $28,341.11 $30,210.90 $2,238.13 8.00%
Sandwich PLD (SA) $8,344.74 $8,171.75 $8,400.96 $7,953.05 $8,443.85 $9,055.66 $710.92 8.52%
Schmaling ML (SC) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,590.78 $4,891.64 $300.86 6.55%
Seneca PL (SE) $8,852.69 $8,894.96 $9,069.97 $8,556.17 $8,936.93 $9,575.19 $722.50 8.16%
Serena Schools (CF) $5,216.60 $4,250.59 $4,333.78 $4,128.50 $4,397.50 $4,685.99 -$530.61 -10.17%
Sherrard PL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,076.20 $6,453.75 $6,937.83 $861.63 14.18%
Silvis PL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7,225.82 $7,493.08 $8,043.69 $817.87 11.32%
Somonauk PL (SN) $10,183.61 $10,003.46 $10,385.78 $9,788.02 $10,204.53 $10,928.92 $745.31 7.32%
South Beloit PLD (SB) $5,781.65 $5,725.70 $5,857.36 $5,636.52 $6,086.88 $6,547.56 $765.91 13.25%
Stockton TL (SK) $0.00 $0.00 $4,562.82 $4,204.05 $4,260.79 $4,540.36 -$22.46 -0.49%
Streator PL (SR) $10,522.01 $7,952.87 $8,336.06 $8,113.83 $8,826.76 $9,460.38 -$1,061.63 -10.09%
Sycamore PL (SY) $17,036.89 $16,478.35 $17,828.02 $17,111.20 $17,888.68 $19,107.12 $2,070.23 12.15%
Three Rivers PL (Channahon/Minooka) (TC) $21,435.27 $20,580.29 $21,514.03 $19,452.12 $19,470.69 $20,785.74 -$649.53 -3.03%
United Township HS (E. Moline) (UT) $7,622.14 $7,830.28 $7,888.05 $7,436.37 $7,677.48 $8,238.18 $616.04 8.08%
Walnut PLD (WA) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,592.82 $4,710.90 $5,019.62 $426.80 9.29%
Warren Township PL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,811.62 $4,070.56 $258.94 6.79%
Western Dist PL (Orion) (WD) $7,170.65 $6,694.64 $7,015.38 $6,393.82 $6,562.44 $7,053.23 -$117.42 0.54%
Wilmington PL (WL) $11,371.28 $10,764.53 $11,355.84 $10,466.07 $10,912.58 $11,683.25 $311.97 2.74%
Yorkville PL (YK) $14,054.46 $13,648.26 $14,042.40 $12,632.75 $12,588.33 $13,463.11 -$591.35 -4.21%
TOTALS $701,676.35 $695,323.98 $727,656.91 $806,360.99 $851,813.64 $916,835.77 $215,159.42 4.80%
24
Strategic Plan Summary Engagement PrairieCat members are actively engaged at all levels, which connects members and advances the organization.
• Members feel informed and connected through targeted, one-way communications.
• Members have strong relationships through personal connections and two-way communication.
• Members are empowered and actively participate in their organization.
Governance PrairieCat provides leadership that is transparent, responsive, innovative, and accountable.
• PrairieCat is sustainable and independent. • PrairieCat has a learning culture supported by continuous improvement. • PrairieCat leadership is innovative and creates a vision that inspires
members.
Training PrairieCat is committed to providing regular and effective opportunities.
• Training opportunities are well advertised and materials are easily accessible.
• Training is available and responsive to member needs. • Training opportunities and materials are evaluated to ensure their
quality and effectiveness.
User Experience PrairieCat commits to excellence in serving our end users.
• PrairieCat designs services focused on meeting user needs and improving end user engagement.
• PrairieCat enhances services to further meet the needs of diverse users.
26
Introduction
All organizations need a strong strategic plan. Such plans provide direction and focus to an organization
as it changes and grows over the course of time. PrairieCat, as an organization that is both growing and
changing, now finds itself in need of a defining and guiding document as we move forward into the next
five years.
This plan represents the overall strategy for PrairieCat for the next five years and is presented to the
Delegates Assembly for approval. Upon approval, PrairieCat staff and the Admin Council will finalize
annualized Activity Plans that will support the overall strategy. While we don’t anticipate any major
changes in the overall strategy, the Activity Plans are living documents that will change as we work
towards goals. The Admin Council will regularly review progress towards meeting plan goals and report
to Delegates.
Our planning process was validating and enlightening. PrairieCat has grown and changed in many ways
since our last planning process, but members remain committed to resource sharing and service.
PrairieCat is only as strong as its members, so we hope that you will read this plan and feel compelled to
join us as we seek to grow and change over the next five years.
Background
PrairieCat faces many challenges in the current climate: budget uncertainty, rising costs of technology
and library systems and diminished sources for those systems, geographic dispersal of membership and
staff. The nature of our partnership with Reaching Across Illinois Library System (RAILS) and the
necessity to facilitate increased independence from that body create a need for an examination of
PrairieCat capacity and an understanding of what this independence means for our future. With these
issues in mind, we entered into the strategic planning process with hopes that a plan would help us
address these issues.
Amanda E. Standerfer, a strategic planning consultant and librarian, was hired to guide us through the
planning process. PrairieCat staff and the Admin Council served as the planning team and met in
December 2016 to design the planning process. Delegates met in January to approve the process and
move forward with the consultant.
Planning Process
In order to create a cohesive, actionable plan, we needed to gather feedback across a wide array of
stakeholders. PrairieCat staff, administration, governance, and membership were included, and several
feedback mechanisms were employed.
After the process design meeting and initial feedback from the Admin Council in December 2016,
PrairieCat staff held six Zone Meetings (Zones based on former RAILS Zones and geographically
distributed in the PrairieCat region). These meetings allowed for members to give input into the
strategic plan by identifying strengths, opportunities, barriers, and values. Attendees considered
patterns that surfaced through the discussion and reflected on priorities.
After the Zone Meetings, the Admin Council met to de-brief the discussions and discuss next steps. Data
gathered revealed four key theme areas and a survey was conducted planned to validate these themes
28
and get additional feedback. With the four key theme areas now solidified, the planning process
narrowed focus to fully develop these areas for the strategic plan.
On May 23, 2017, approximately 40 PrairieCat members gathered at the Kishwaukee College in Malta
for a day-long Summit. Attendees divided into groups based on the four key theme areas. Discussions
helped define the key theme and brainstorm goals and activities. All data gathered to this point in the
process was synthesized into a draft plan.
After reviewing and refining the plan, along with the mission, vision, and values statements, at the
Admin Council meeting on July 7, 2017, PrairieCat staff and the consultant worked to develop a final
draft for approval at Delegates in October.
Mission, Vison, Values, Themes
Mission:
PrairieCat assists members in the successful sharing of resources and services,
expanding the quality and quantity of information accessible to our library users.
Our mission remains largely unchanged from the last plan and continues to reflect our core values and
commitment to collaboration to best meet the needs of the patrons of our member libraries. Our
mission is the core of what we do together and is our promise to each other.
Vision:
Connecting libraries to strengthen communities.
Our vision is what we hope to see in the world if we successfully carry out our mission. Connected
libraries mean stronger communities – plain and simple. We feel that this vision is compelling,
memorable, and easily understood by all stakeholders.
Values:
Collaboration – We strive to share member resources as effectively and economically as
possible.
Diversity – We value and respect the contributions of others who have talents and abilities,
constraints and opportunities that are different than our own, and strive to provide equal
footing for libraries of all types and sizes.
Responsiveness – We strive to provide excellent services by focusing on the needs and wants of
our customers.
Engagement – We value collaborative members with involved, well-trained, competent staff.
Access – We strive for an effective, well-maintained catalog supporting strong member
collections.
Innovation – We work to sustain a consortium that leverages our size to the benefit of the
members, and provides the appropriate resources, leadership and services in pursuit of
excellent library service.
29
Our values remain largely the same as our previous plan as well with some minor language updates.
This plan is rooted in these values and are kept in mind as we operationalize this plan. PrairieCat
members share these values and embody them at their libraries on a daily basis.
Key Themes:
This plan is divided into four key theme areas: Engagement, Governance, Training, and User Experience.
As noted in the Planning Process section, these themes emerged during the initial months of the process
and were validated by a membership survey. Summit attendees gave input into “vision statements” for
each theme, which represent what PrairieCat aspires to achieve through this plan.
This image serves as a high-level reminder of our focus during the life of this plan and gives a snapshot
of what we hope our members will see in us if we are successful. We plan to use this image as a
reminder to members of how we are organizing our work and how they can connect with us.
30
Outcomes
What we are doing right: At its very core, PrairieCat exists to provide an integrated library system (ILS)
to members. Having a central ILS provides efficiencies to the 130+ members and allows for maximum
resource sharing that benefits hundreds of thousands of library patrons.
PrairieCat has successfully grown circulating membership as a result of its last strategic plan and seeks to
build on its success through this plan over the next five years.
What we need to do more of:
PrairieCat needs to be very mindful of our need to remain sustainable for the future. Reliance on
sources of revenue from the state/RAILS has proven to be somewhat tenuous and is not guaranteed in
the future. PrairieCat must assume a decreasing role in state funding over the course of the coming
years, and plan for a worst-case scenario that permits operations with minimized funding from these
sources.
Likewise, many members voiced a desire to pursue the opportunities that group purchasing of some
services and software might bring to our membership. Creating an organization that would allow for
such purchasing, while at the same time allow those members who are interested in just sharing an
Integrated System as we do currently, is something that PrairieCat should pursue in the future.
We should be mindful of creating an organization that can accommodate multiple levels of involvement
in order to allow for the varying needs and resources of our membership.
What we need to start doing better:
PrairieCat members are very diverse in size and type, community make up, and level of engagement
with the organization. As with many membership organizations, not all members are as active as they
would like to or are able to be. PrairieCat needs to work harder on creating engagement opportunities
for all members. In the past, geography has been a barrier, but tools and technologies are now readily
available and easy to use that eliminate those barriers.
Engagement is also difficult to measure. This plan includes tools that PrairieCat can use to define
successful engagement and metrics to track progress. More engagement means stronger connections
between members, better networking, and ultimately a more satisfying experience.
In order to promote engagement with our membership as well as our end users, a coordinated
marketing plan must be developed and implemented. This plan should be a part of our overall
communications plan, which should also be developed for both internal and external stakeholders.
Our members were loud and clear during this process that they need more training.
Training has always been of fundamental importance to PrairieCat. After all, members would not be
able to use the ILS if they were not properly trained. However, we heard through the planning process
that training needs are changing and this plan incorporates goals that will help us update and improve
our training.
31
Goals, Activities, Measures
The following page is a one-page summary of this strategic plan. It includes the vision statements for
each of the four key theme areas and details the goals in each area. Following the one-page summary is
additional detail for each theme area, including some proposed activities for each goals and thoughts on
possible metrics. The complete Activity Plan is being drafted by staff and the Admin Council and will
serve as an implementation guide during the life of this plan. Progress toward meeting plan goals will be
regularly reported at future Delegates meetings.
32
Engagement
PrairieCat seeks to deeply connect with members and create stronger connections between members.
As mentioned above, engagement is a very personal concept and means different things to different
people. Through the goals of this key theme, we hope to better define successful engagement and
create additional opportunities for engagement. We also want to be responsive to how members want
to engage and respectful of their uniqueness and abilities.
Goal 1: Members feel informed and connected through targeted, one-way communications.
Activities include:
Finalizing and implementing a Communications and Marketing Plan.
Developing a graphic yearly meeting calendar.
Goal 2: Members have strong relationships through personal connections and two-way communication.
Activities include:
Continuing Zone Meetings.
Developing an organized mentoring program.
Formalizing new member orientation.
Goal 3: Members are empowered and actively participate in their organization.
Activities include:
Forming a Member Engagement Committee to work on an engagement program.
Developing leadership recruitment plans.
Adding networking opportunities and fun activities to the Delegates Assembly meetings.
Goal 4: Strengthen the PrairieCat brand so that it is easily recognized by stakeholders.
Activities include:
Reaching out to prospective members.
Building relationships with vendors.
Re-designing the logo and Website.
How will we know we are successful?
33
Metrics include: Tracking face-to-face meeting participation, number of site visits, and percentage of
voter participation in elections.
Governance
PrairieCat is facing significant changes in governance over the next five years, including separating staff
from RAILS. Governance issues are not as compelling as other aspects of this plan, but they are the
bedrock for organizational growth. Successfully reaching these governance goals means that the
organization is stronger and sustainable in five years. Without sustainability, none of the other activities
matter.
Goal 1: PrairieCat is sustainable and independent.
Activities include:
Separating staff from RAILS.
Developing a business plan.
Building financial reserves and implementing multi-year budgeting.
Goal 2: PrairieCat has a learning culture supported by continuous improvement.
Activities include:
Reviewing and revising Bylaws.
Reevaluating representation tiers.
Streamlining voting at the Delegates Assembly meetings.
Goal 3: Leadership is innovative and creates a vision that inspires members.
Activities include:
Organizing a team to develop and initiate enhanced membership options.
Adding educational components to the Delegates Assembly meetings.
Developing a plan for growing the membership.
How will we know we are successful?
Metrics include: Percent of budget provided by RAILS, staffing independence, and annual member
satisfaction feedback (collected via a survey).
34
Training
Without training, PrairieCat members are unable to use the ILS to the best of their abilities. Training is
also at the core of PrairieCat’s commitment to continuous improvement with members. Through
training, PrairieCat is able to connect with staff at member libraries that they might not otherwise have
the opportunity to meet. Developing relationships with all staff-level users at member libraries is
important for understanding their needs and improving training sessions and materials.
In addition, this plan seeks to establish training benchmarks and make improvements based on
outcomes. By more systematically tracking and evaluating training, we will holistically approach change
in this theme. We’ll also learn how to make the best use of technology tools that will enhance our
success.
Goal 1: Training opportunities are well advertised and materials are easily accessible.
Activities include:
Updating designated training contact for each member.
Utilizing multiple methods for advertising training.
Reorganizing the Website so training and training materials are easy to find.
Goal 2: Training is available and responsive to member needs.
Activities include:
Expanding training formats.
Developing the mentoring program to include a training component.
Including training opportunities at Zone Meetings.
Goal 3: Training opportunities and materials are evaluated to ensure their quality and effectiveness.
Activities include:
Developing an evaluation framework for training and training materials.
Tracking training by member and individual library staff.
Developing a badging program.
How will we know we are successful?
Metrics include: Number of training participants, events, and contact hours, participation in a badging
program, and annually reviewing benchmarks, changes needed, and growth areas (collected via a
survey).
35
User Experience
Ensuring a great experience for patrons of PrairieCat member libraries is the most public and far-
reaching aspect of this plan. Patrons of member libraries are diverse in all ways imaginable and
PrairieCat wants to empower members to connect with their patrons through their collections, shared
resources, and other cooperative services.
This goal goes beyond PrairieCat members and seeks to incorporate feedback from the end users. After
all, we need to understand what users want if we want to improve their experience. This key theme will
continue to grow and evolve as we learn from users and aspire to improve our services.
Goal 1: PrairieCat designs services focused on meeting user needs and improving end user engagement.
Activities include:
Establishing a User Experience Team to coordinate activities and user feedback.
Looking for opportunities to standardize loan periods and policies.
Goal 2: PrairieCat enhances services to further meet the needs of diverse users.
Activities include:
Considering expanding the languages available in the card catalog.
Implementing a mobile app for the catalog.
Develop policies and practices for non-traditional materials.
How will we know we are successful?
Metrics include: Usage statistics for end user products and services, user satisfaction and knowledge of
services survey, and annually reviewing benchmarks, changes needed, and growth areas (collected via a
survey).
36