defining great places: using data-driven storytelling to unlock the power of place

94
I have a confession to make. I was asked to come here today because people have come to think of me as the methods girl, a data geek, a methodholic. But actually, I'm a placeoholic Methods, data, definition, rationalism, are just my drugs of choice I use to feed my place addiction I very much embrace the notion that If you cannot measure it, it doesn't exist but not for the sake of measurement itself' but for the sake of changing it for the sake of convincing other people to change it for the sake of communicating the value of urban design But I didn't start out this way. Defining Great Places Using data-driven storytelling to unlock the power of place TM Mariela Alfonzo, Ph.D. Founder, State of Place TM Research Assistant Professor, NYU OU Institute for Quality Communities Placemaking Conference, March 21 st , 2015

Upload: state-of-place

Post on 21-Jul-2015

437 views

Category:

Data & Analytics


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

I have a confession to make.I was asked to come here today because people have come to think of me as the methods girl, a data geek, a methodholic.But actually, I'm a placeoholicMethods, data, definition, rationalism, are just my drugs of choice I use to feed my place addictionI very much embrace the notion thatIf you cannot measure it, it doesn't existbut not for the sake of measurement itself'but for the sake of changing itfor the sake of convincing other people to change itfor the sake of communicating the value of urban designBut I didn't start out this way.

Defining Great Places

Using data-driven storytelling to

unlock the power of place

TM

Mariela Alfonzo, Ph.D.

Founder, State of Place TM

Research Assistant Professor, NYU

OU Institute for Quality Communities

Placemaking Conference, March 21st, 2015

This is my hometown - westchester

meeyame

Where my most exhilarating memory is

playing an ersatz game of frogger

as i tightroped down pencil thin

sidewalks

dogging cars as I crossed strip-mall

lined highways masquerading as

streets

all to get to a chicken teriyaki sub.

Growing up in Miami - especially as a

carless teenager sucked.

This was life

This was work

This was play

Caddy corner form another form of

play

This was our best hope for place

I always say the best place to find

Miami's soul is within a tired strip mall

along an otherwise placeless artery at

the famous Versailles café.

This is the typical scene outside of the

Versailles Café window – la ventanita –

where all the Cubans gather around

talking about their heydays on the

island.

I don't blame them, I'd miss this place too.

Miamians – Cuban exiles or otherwise – are obviously starving for place; creating it out of whatever they can.

But what miami lacked in place, I made up for in passion

Ironically, I owe my intimate understanding of the power of place, or lack thereof, to Miami.

I desperately wanted to fix Miami, to help create place

I thought if you could only convince people, show them the power of place…its value…that things could change. Even

then I was convinced better places did better, all around.

I just needed to find a way to prove that to people.

for a while, I thought I would do that as an architect

I had studied psychology as an undergrad but had always been interested in design as a way to create solutions to

problems - guess that's what drew me to psychology too

but as a grad student in architecture, I was too much of a social scientist. I was less focused on the nuts and bolts of

design and more on the question -- how will this make people feel? what has been done in the past that has been

successful in producing an emotion, in facilitating a behavior...

I left architecture school as I didn't feel I was being trained to answer those questions, those questions that were most

important to me.

I was so confused. My friends joked with me – well, you could design houses for psychologists or psychoanalyze architects.

Yeah, thanks, great help!

So needing to make some money, I took a temporary detour, working at a global advertising agency. But my very first

day there, I hated it. It was quarter to 5 and no one seemed to be getting ready to go. Um, wait, what? This job is from 9

to 6, not 9 to 5? And effectively, more like 9 to 7 or 8? I don't get to be creative? I don't get to solve problems? 5 minutes

into this major life crisis, I typed into Yahoo, as this preceded the Google days, "psychology" and "architecture" and I

found a woman who had a Phd in Psychology and a Masters in Architecture. Yes, I wasn't crazy - there are other people

out there that want to "fix" places as a vehicle to "fix" people.

One year later, I was a first year PhD student at UC Irvine clamoring for research experience.

I began working with a team

evaluating the Safe Routes to School

program in California. It was in that

project that I first dipped my toe into

the world of methods. It was the first

time that I had heard the term

"walkability" and the first time I had

thought about health as it related to

the power of place. We evaluated 16

schools across the state using an urban

design audit tool that measured about

20 built environment features, like

sidewalks and road width. But we

encountered so many more urban

design issues that children were

battling with on an everyday basis just

to get to school

2

12. Maintenance1

a. Abandoned buildings are absent Y N N/A_________________

b. Seriously run-down buildings, lots are absent Y N N/A_________________

c. Vacant lots are absent Y N N/A_________________

d. Visible graffiti is absent Y N N/A_________________

13. Type of people1

a. “Undesirable” people are absent Y N N/A_________________

14. Type of land uses1

a. “Undesirable” land uses are absent Y N N/A _________________

15. Number of pedestrians

a. # of pedestrians on segment (NOT people at home) _________________

D. ACTUAL TRAFFIC SAFETY (observers do 16-20 together)

16. Road capacity

a. Number of lanes of traffic (for length of segment) _________________

17. Street width

a. Street width at 1st corner, in feet _________________

18. Segment length

a. Length of segment from one end to the other, in feet _________________

19. Sidewalk width

a. Sidewalk width at 1st corner, in feet _________________

20. Turning radii

a. Turning radii at 1st corner (soft/med/hard) _________________

21. Intersections

a. Number of marked crosswalks originating from segment _______ of ______

b. (If 4 or more lanes of traffic)Traffic signal present* Y N N/A_________________

c. Number of stop signs at intersections for segment _______ of ______

22. The following traffic calming features are present:

a. traffic circles Y N N/A_________________

b. curb bulb-outs Y N N/A_________________

c. speed bumps, humps, or tables Y N N/A_________________

d. cul de sac or street closing Y N N/A_________________

e. median Y N N/A_________________

f. paving treatment at crosswalk Y N N/A_________________

23. The following urban design features associated with

liveliness are present:

a. Street trees Y N N/A_________________

b. Mixed land uses Y N N/A_________________

c. Public space Y N N/A _________________

d. Street furniture Y N N/A _________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

1 Write explanation for all “No’s” in this question.

Overgrown bushes making an already

tiny 3ft sidewalk effectively unusable,

forcing kids to walk along the road or

do a balancing act on the one-foot

wide sidewalk curb

Or in other cases forcing them to step over the

barricade that was placed between the sidewalk

and the road to purportedly "keep people safe."

I realized that this was the early days of measuring

urban design – it was 2001

but I knew we were not capturing so much that

mattered to our perceptions, safety, behavior...

I also began to realize that the whole of urban

design was bigger than the sum of its parts.

I became obsessed with understanding what

influenced people's decisions to walk. I got a lot of

personal practice at this, as I didn't have a car for

my first two years in SoCal. I have seen it all – well, I

thought so until I started working in China – but

that’s a whole other talk!

I couldn't get out of my own head. every time I took

a step, I took copious mental notes about the

design features that were influencing me - the

setbacks, the height of the buildings, the trees, the

views, the colors, the windows, the smells.

I thought about Malibu’s beautiful but

sidewalk-less landscapes

I thought about Irvine’s beautiful yet

useless sidewalks abutting the

uttermost boring of cookie cutter

shopping plazas

I thought about the older parts of LA

that had great bones but didn’t feel

quite safe or inviting as a pedestrian

I thought about the quaint scale of

Laguna Beach

I thought about the dynamic nature of

the streets of Santa Monica

I realized that not everything mattered

in the same way at the same time.

THE HIERARCHY OF WALKING NEEDS

I thought about the quaint scale of Laguna Beach

That’s when I wrote the hierarchy of walking needs – my aim was to organize all these different elements of urban design that mattered based on what was most fundamental for a walk to occur, starting with accessibility (having somewhere to walk on and to), perceived safety from crime (not feeling like you were going to be in danger), pedestrian comfort (not feeling like you were going to get run over/feeling like you belonged as a pedestrian), and finally pleasurability (the things that made a walk interesting and enjoyable). I argued that in most cases, you needed to address the most fundamental needs first – think of Irvine, as an example, in which many of the streets were quite aesthetically pleasing, but you had no real reason to walk on them in terms of getting to a destination).

THE HIERARCHY OF WALKING NEEDS

My aim was to provide a framework for those studying the links between

urban design and physical activity – to encourage people to analyze built

environment features as a composite of various urban design dimensions, the

way they occurred in real life, instead of just evaluating the impacts of single

features, like sidewalks. My goal was to indeed produce a better

methodology…

I had begun to become the methods girl

But it wasn't until the Irvine Minnesota Inventory that I got the opportunity to

really geek out.

With funding from Robert Wood Johnson Foundation through Active Living

Research, we were tasked to establish an objective built environment audit

tool that would allow researchers to test the relationship between urban

design and health.

We visited dozens of neighborhoods. My job was to literally jot down every

possible item you could think of that would influence our choices to walk –

ironically enough, I had to buy a car to do so! I remember driving through

Barstow and thinking, oh, yeah, a jail. That might impact our decision to

walk…It didn’t make it to the final version though!

Throughout this process, I combed through

The goodDynamic public plazas encased by engaging retail within buildings full of character

Organized chaos, with various forms of mobility living side by side, that prioritized the pedestrian

The importance of lightingThe contribution of the whimsical

The delicate balance between the private and the public, the active

and the intimate

The importance of urban parks and providing access to nature

The provision of bicycle infrastructure,How a couple of chairs and tables transform streets into buzzing centers of activityYou know those people are having fun and that feeling is infectious – that’s what amazing about just going for a walk in a city filled with places

The juxtaposition of the high brow and the ordinary

The interactive possibility of designAnd creating true civic places

Offering different opportunities to sit

RestLingerWatch other people – one of the best things to do in great places

And adapting that to all climates and types of places

And noting the resiliency of the human sprit, even when we are not provided official places to sit, or we are explicitly barred from it

The dynamic effect of food within the urban landscapeThe colors, the smell, the access

Playing with color and lightAnd understanding nightscapes

Having little nodes of activity and hidden retreats

the desire for personalization

Admiring the so ridiculously quaint I want to hug it facade

appreciating absolutely perfect urban form and scale

And then the badEncountering so many obstacles along the way

So many times we are told we’re not wanted or not thought of

Or not prioritized

When the sidewalk literally does end…

When there is literally a disconnect

When landscapes are littered with homogenous, never-ending rivers of strip malls

Which force us to drive from one to the other even when they are right across the street from one another

When it’s obvious we are purposely not meant to traverse a place

And finally, the ugly.I think this was the no-turning back point for me. I officially became that girl who could not help but indulge in incessant commentary about the built environment and the public realm every time she stepped foot outside –and mostly framed as what needed to be fixed! I call it advanced people-watching (a al William Whyte); it’s the one key skill I try to impart onto my urban design students. But if you’re not an urbanist…ah, my poor fiancé. Bless his heart. The funniest thing is I’ve caught him now several times starting a sentence with “From an urban design perspective…” Yes! I’ve done my job. We do try to incorporate some non-urban spots when we go on vacation for both our sakes! I have a lot less to say about fields and mountains!

So in the end, we identified 241 items and after reliability testing, 162 ended up in the original IMI.It was GREAT! We had done it. We had measured urban design!BUTWe had built a tool for measurements sake.I’ve since fielded dozens of calls from researchers and practitioners asking us how to use this thing – and as the grad student on the project, I was really the only one who knew what to do with it!

IRVINE MINNESOTA INVENTORY Page 1

Date 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Time

Observer

Segment #

Answer questions 1-6 based on this end of the segment

Intersection

Neighborhood Identification1. Are there monuments or markers including neighborhood entry

signs that indicate that one is entering a special district or area? 1 yes = 1; no = 0

Street Crossing2a. Consider the places on the segment that are intended for

pedestrians to cross the street. Are these places marked for pedestrian

crossing? Mark N/A if there are no intended places to cross. 2 all = 2; some = 1; none = 0; NA = 8

2b. What type of marking do the crosswalks have? Mark all that

apply. Mark N/A if 2a= 0 or 8

White painted lines 3 yes = 1; no = 0; NA = 8

Colored painted lines 4 yes = 1; no = 0; NA = 8

Zebra striping 5 yes = 1; no = 0; NA = 8

Different road surface or paving (e.g. tiles, colored concrete, marble,

etc) 6

yes = 1; no = 0; NA = 8

Other 7 yes = 1; no = 0; NA = 8

3. Are there curb cuts at all places where crossing is expected to

occur? Mark N/A if there are no intended places to cross.8 all = 2; some = 1; none = 0; NA = 8

4. What type of traffic/pedestrian signal(s)/system(s) is/are provided?

Mark all that apply.

Traffic signal 9 yes = 1; no = 0

Stop sign 10 yes = 1; no = 0

Yield sign 11 yes = 1; no = 0

Pedestrian activated signal 12 yes = 1; no = 0

Pedestrian crossing sign 13 yes = 1; no = 0

Pedestrian overpass/underpass/bridge 14 yes = 1; no = 0

5. For an individual who is on this segment, how safe (traffic wise) do

you think it is to cross the street from this segment? 15

pretty/very safe = 1;

not very safe/ unsafe = 0; cul de sac = 8

6. For an individual who is on this segment, how convenient (traffic

wise) do you think it is to cross the street from this segment?

16

pretty/very convenient =1;

not very/inconvenient= 0;

cul de sac = 8

Answer questions 7-11 while standing at the beginning of the segmentNeighborhood Identification

7. Does the segment have banners that identify the neighborhood? 17 some/a lot = 2; few = 1; none = 0

Street Characteristics

8a. Is this a pedestrianized street? 18 yes = 1; no = 0

8b. Is the street a … 19 one way = 1; two way = 2

9. Is this segment an alley? 20 yes = 1; no = 0

10. How many vehicle lanes are there for cars? (Include turning lanes).

21

six or more = 6; five = 5; four = 4;

three = 3; two = 2; one = 1;

NA (no lanes for car travel) = 8

Views

11a. Is this segment characterized by having a significant open view

of an object or scene that is not on the segment? The view must be a

prominent one. 22

yes = 1; no = 0

11b. How attractive is the open view?

23

attractive = 3; neutral = 2; unattractive =

1; NA (no views) = 8

Begin walking along segment to answer questions 12-6812a. What types of land uses are present on this area? Mark all that

apply.

Residential

Single family home - detached 24 yes = 1; no = 0

Single family home/duplex - attached (2 units or fewer) 25 yes = 1; no = 0

Town home/condo/apartment housing (3 units or more) 26 yes = 1; no = 0

Mobile homes (includes manufactured homes) 27 yes = 1; no = 0

Residential, other 28 yes = 1; no = 0

But even before the ink was dry on the IMI, I met a group of “urban brokers” – renegades – from Houston that wanted to tell the story of place, or lack of thereof in their case. They planned to rank several neighborhoods in Houston based on their sense of place. As the purported methods girl, I asked them how they planned to do that. They had no clue – they were planning to have a group of “experts” subjectively judge these places. Enter light bulb moment – so hey, I have this tool… I was forced to come up with a quick and dirty methodology – the very first version of my State of Place algorithm (which I’ll get to later) – to use the IMI to tell a story about neighborhoods' Sense of Place! We gave each of the 12 neighborhoods grades and everything. In 2005!Now I really thought I had my eureka moment…we thought this would incite these neighborhoods to think about Place, to compete on the basis on Place. But again, this was 10 years ago. Even if we had begun to define the nuts and bolts of great placesIt couldn’t just be about health. It couldn’t just be about sense of place. I STILL had to show them the money if I wanted them to consider place in the equation. I realized I had to learn a whole new language – and method. The language of real estate economics and finance. I audited a real estate development class, jumped feet first into an intense relationship with the Urban Land Institute, got countless headaches from trying to figure out all of the jargon and oh my God, the acronyms. If you think we urban planners and designers have acronyms. Wow.

As I was slowly absorbing the concepts of mezzanine finance and cap rates, I had one pivotal conversation with one of my many new real estate friends who worked for a large insurance company about how they chose which deals to invest in. He rattled off a whole bunch of jargon but none of them had to do with place. Far from it. They didn’t even know what most of these buildings actually looked like! I was floored. I made it my quest that day to measure the value of urban design – to truly use methods to feed my place addiction – no actually, to convince others they should feed my place addiction.

And then came Brookings! I finally had the opportunity to truly tie built environment features not just to walking, health, sense of place and community, but to economic value. We gathered IMI and real estate data from over 60 neighborhoods in the Washington DC Metro area that were sampled from over 240 neighborhoods along a continuum of walkability, from the auto-dominated exurbs to the highly walkable core. A meta-analyses examining the results of dozens of studies evaluating the relationship between the built environment and walking guided the development of the first official State of Place algorithm – finally! I created a comprehensive index, ranging from 0 to 100, to make sense out of the 162 data points we were gathering with the IMI. I’ll go into that more in just a little bit, but first the real Eureka moment:

BR

OO

KIN

GS

| May 2

012

4

Figure 1. Neighborhoods Included in Study and their Walkability Scores

Very Low

State of Place™ Index

Tied to Economic Value

0 - 20Low

Moderate

Good

Very

Good21 - 40

41 - 60

61 - 80

81 -

100

*PREMIUMS FOR EACH

LEVEL INCREASE

+ $9 SF OFFICE RENTS

+ $7 SF RETAIL RENTS

+80% RETAIL

REVENUES

+ $300 UNIT RES. RENT

+$81SF FOR-SALE

RES. VALUE

When you aggregate what that means in terms of going from the lowest to the highest level of State of Place, the numbers are quite startling.

+ $37 sq. ft. Office Rents

+ $30 sq. ft. Retail Rents

+340% Retail Revenues

+ $1281/Unit Residential Rent

+$347 sq. ft. For-sale Residential

State of Place™ Index: 90, Very Good

State of Place™ Index: 5, Very Low

And all in all, these premiums have serious implications for economic development in terms of retail and property tax bases

WASHINGTON, DC

If you were to apply these numbers – in terms of magnitude of impact – relative to Oklahoma City, if it were to move up four levels, it really starts to weave a tale of why place matters. If this slide doesn’t create an objective narrative for the power of place, I’m not sure what else can.

OKLAHOMA CITY

And if you extrapolate out what this means in terms of economic development, even when just talking about moving up two State of Place levels, there is considerable unlocked potential throughout this city, at least with respect to value that can be generated from the built environment.

+ $37 sq. ft. Office Rents

+ $30 sq. ft. Retail Rents

+340% Retail Revenues

+ $1281/Unit Residential Rent

+$347 sq. ft. For-sale Residential

State of Place™ Index: 90, Very Good

OKLAHOMA CITY

TM

280+URBAN

DESIGN

FEATURES

TOUCH,

SEE &

FEELWALKABILIT

Y

FROM

ARCADES

TO

ZEBRA STRIPES

TRAINING

VIDEO

+

INTERACTIVE

QUIZ

TRAINED COMMUNITY

MEMBERS OR STAFF

COLLECT DATA

MINUTES/B

L O C K

10-15

STATE OF

PLACE APP

SEAMLESSLY

TRANSFERS

DATA TO

SERVERS

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

DENSITY

FORM

CONNECTIVIT

YPROXIMITY

PARKS & PUBLIC

SPACES

RECREATIONAL FACILITIES

PEDESTRIAN & BIKE

AMENITIESTRAFFIC SAFETY

AESTHETICS

PERSONAL SAFETY

URBAN

FABRIC

DESTINATIONS

HUMAN

NEEDS &

COMFORT

LIVELINESS &

UPKEEP

STATE OF PLACE™ INDEX & PROFILE

For Density, we are measuring building compactness and height, not so much population density – this is particularly important in terms of making it feasible to have enough destinations to walk to within a reasonable walking distance. It can also influence the scale of city – is it for cars or people?

DENSITYCompactness &

Height

Related to that is Urban Form. Here we are measuring streetscape continuity, so we take into account building setbacks, how the building meets the street, the siting of buildings, and the number and width of buildings. This is what I like to call the hugability of a street. If the form is off, a street can feel aloof or it can feel suffocating. You know you’ve achieved the right proportions of setbacks, street width, and building height when it feels like the street is hugging you.

FORMStreetscape

Continuity

CONNECTIVITYAccess &

Barriers

Proximity refers to the diversity of the land use mix – the number of non-residential land uses there are to walk to. So literally, how many of your daily needs, services, and amenities are present within a certain distance of you

PROXIMITYLand Use Mix

Photo Credit Nakeva Corothers

With parks and public spaces, we include the presence hard and soft scape public spaces, as well as their quality and accessibility. These are often the soul and life of neighborhoods, they are the city’s living rooms. Along with museums and monuments, these are the places you bring your friends and families to when they come visit. I can tell a lot about a city based on how people use their public spaces.

PARKS & PUBLIC

SPACESPresence, Quality & Access

We also look at recreational facilities –separately. This is getting a bit more at recreational walking, but the literature found this to be an important determinant for physical activity, so we measure the presence of outdoor and indoor physical activity facilities.

RECREATIONAL

FACILITIES

Photo Credit Bill Cotter

Pedestrian and bike amenities refer to aspects of the built environment that make it comfortable or pleasant to be a pedestrian, so sidewalk presence and quality, seating, bike lane presence and type, street trees, etc. Along with form, these are the features that truly help distinguish car-focused neighborhoods from people-first places – they are the things that make you want to linger…

PEDESTRIA

N

& BIKE

AMENITIES

Along with that, we look at traffic safety. Here we are mainly focusing on the quality and safety of the intersection as well as the presence of traffic calming features. These include the presence of curbcuts, crosswalk markings, traffic standards, and on-street parking. These are the features that help manage all of the mobile members of the public realm – people, strollers, bicyclists, scooters, cars, and buses.

TRAFFIC

SAFETY

Aesthetics goes beyond the visually pleasing; it also includes aspects of urban design that make places more dynamic and inviting. We look at the transparency of buildings, colors, outdoor dining, street trees, building maintenance, ground floor uses, etc. This is charm, character, the wow factor – the things you’ll most remember about places.

AESTHETIC

SLiveliness &

maintenance

Finally, personal safety refers not to actual crime data but rather the aspects of the built environment that influence our perception of safety – these are called physical incivilities and include features like graffiti, litter, broken windows, abandoned buildings and lighting. These features actually influence walking rates more than the rates of crime incidents.

PERSONAL

SAFETY

So what does all of this mean for Oklahoma?How can these methods, this amount of definition, actually be weaved into a data-driven story that will help enhance your State of Place?

When you look at a street like this in Norman, where do you start? How do you convince others to want to start? How can you use methods to feed your place addition?

Identify Priorities

State of Place Index

State of Place Profiles

Scenario Analysis

Run Analytics

Platform conducts “multi-criterion assessment” to

identify top priorities.

Example, Walkability as a Goal:

Dimension Performanc

e

Ranking for Goal

(Walkability)

Impact* Feasibilit

y

Communit

y

Score

Density 76.5 9 .432 1 4.3 91.4

Form 65.4 9 .543 1 7.1 169.1

Connectivity 55.8 9 .342 1 6.3 136.0

Proximity 74.3 9 .765 2 9.5 353.9

Parks & Public Spaces 23.5 9 .634 2 7.4873.0

Recreational Facilities 13.4 9 .548 2 5.7854.2

Pedestrian Amenities 55.4 9 .813 3 8.6979.0

Traffic Safety 43.1 9 .745 3 8.8 1144.5

Aesthetics 58.4 9 .436 4 7.5 962.3

Personal Safety 71.3 9 .512 4 9.3 529.0

*Impact scores listed here are for explanatory purposes only;

the actual impact scores are proprietary.

Here we can see then see how any dimension, in this case Traffic Safety which came out on top as a priority, parses out within the study area.

Traffic Safety Spatial Analysis

Identify Priorities

State of Place Index

State of Place Profiles

Scenario Analysis

Run Analytics

Compare Interventions

See Recommendations

Compare Projects

Choose Up To Three Dimensions To Compare

Density

Form

Connectivity

Proximity

Parks & Public Spaces

Recreational Facilities

Pedestrian & Bicyclist Amenities

Traffic Safety

Aesthetics

Personal Safety

Parks &

Public Spaces

$80,000

Pedestrian & Bicyclist

Amenities

Traffic

Safety

Add Park

Add Plaza

New PlazaPark Maintenance

Arcades

Benches

Sidewalk Buffers

Street Trees

Sidewalk Buffers

Crosswalks

Curbcuts

Midblock Crossing

Pedestrian Countdown

CurbCuts

Enter Project Cost Enter Project Cost

Select Interventions

Com. property tax

For-sale residential

Office rents

Retail rents

Residential rents

Res. property taxes

Vacancy Rates

Retail Rents

Enter Baseline

Select Goal

Calculate Predicted ROI

Parks &

Public Spaces

$80,000

Pedestrian & Bicyclist

Amenities

Traffic

Safety

$300,000 $150,000

$1.09/sf $0.89/sf

Park Maintenance Sidewalk Buffers Curbcuts

$1.43/sf

Predicted ROI: Retail Rents

+4.3% +3.1% +3.7%

Impact on State of Place Index

Compare Interventions

See Recommendations

Compare Projects

Enter Project Cost Enter Project Cost

Enter Project Information

Neighborhood 1

$1,800,000

Neighborhood 1 Neighborhood 1

Project 1 Project 2 Project 3

Com. property tax

For-sale residential

Office rents

Retail rents

Residential rents

Res. property taxes

Vacancy Rates

Retail Rents

Enter Baseline

Select Goal

Calculate Predicted ROI

Neighborhood 1

$1,800,000

Neighborhood 1 Neighborhood 1

$2,700,000 $2,300,000

$1.43/sf $0.99/sf

Project 1 Project 2 Project 3

$1.56/sf

Predicted ROI: Retail Rents

+6.0% +2.0% +11.0%

Impact on State of Place Index

Map It

We are doing this currently for one of our clients who is managing a $30M equity fund focusing on underserved neighborhoods in Boston. They are using State of Place to help identify which development projects will have the most impact on Place – and ultimately informing which ones they will fund.

Predicted ROI Impact of Proposed Projects

We could do the same for this scenario…and create a data-driven story to make the case for place…

The good news is that if my hometown, Meeyamee, finally has begun to figure this out, so can Oklahoma City, believe me!

TM

[email protected]

www.stateofplace.org

For full demo: bit.ly/DemoSoP