defense security service. dss update dss changing with a changing security environment
TRANSCRIPT
Defense Security Service
DSS Update
DSS Changing With A Changing Security Environment
DSS UpdateFY12 in Review:• Conducted 8,162 security vulnerability assessments• Identified 12,700 security vulnerabilities, tracked all through mitigation• 3,150 FCL requests processed vice 2,500 in FY11
Issued 1,968 facility security clearances (1,558 final, 410 interims)• Issued 6,574 accreditations
2,397 ATOs, average 83 days 2,479 IATOs, average 15 days 1,698 Straight to ATO, average 14 days
• 234,686 Adjudication actions IRTPA - average 8 days
• Made 355 cyber notifications
FY12 in Review• Changed vernacular:
Assessments vs Inspections Vulnerabilities vs Deficiencies and Findings
• New Workload Prioritization – “Right Facility at the Right Time” Focus on identification and mitigation of security vulnerabilities
• Security Rating Matrix
• Implemented Cyber Notification Process
• Initiated pre-CCRI visits and continued preparation to assume mission from DISA
• DISCO merged into the DoDCAF Stand-up of Personnel Security Management and Oversight for Industry (PSMO-I)
DSS Update
FY12 in Review• VOI Survey Results
94% satisfied/somewhat satisfied with DSS guidance and support 87% agree that their facility has a strong partnership with DSS 90% rated DSS as excellent/good in the area of industrial security program
vulnerability identification and mitigation
• Two New Regional Directors Selected – Southern Region and Capital Region
• Partnership with Industry 17 exchanges 17 active industry partners 25 exchanges planned for FY13
DSS Update
f Threat,Vulnerability Assessments
IT AccreditationsCCRIs
Security Clearance Process
Vulnerability,
Suspicious Contact ReportsIIRs
Referrals for ActionCyber\Threat Notifications
Risk Based PrioritizationCompany AssessmentsProgram Assessments
FOCI AnalysisCFIUS Reviews
Risk ConsequenceValue
Managing Risk … Cleared Industry
= {
{Security Education
Security Training
Security Professionalization
• FOCI Mitigation• Transmission• Export Control• Technology Control Plans
• Foreign Intelligence• Potential Espionage
Indicators• Insider Threat Awareness• Classified Management• Security Awareness• Reporting Requirements
• SIPRNet• Accredited WAN/LAN• Trusted Download• Electronic Control Plans
• Closed Areas• Personnel Security• Secure Storage• Security Violations• Classified Visits• Acquisitions & Mergers
Traditional / Physical
Information Systems
FOCI International
Security Education
THREATVulnerability Assessments
8.4%
16.8%
74.4%
0.2% 0.2%
FY12
7.5%
16.0%
76.1%
0.2%0.2%
FY13
Assessment Ratings FY12 vs FY13
Vulnerability Assessments
Top Ten Vulnerabilities (49% of total):• 02-200 Personnel Security Clearances - General (incl. 02-200B Deny Access for Deny Revoke
or Suspension PCLs)• 02-202 Procedures for Completing the Electronic Version of the SF 86 (incl. 02-202A SF86
Data Protection and Official Use, 02-202B SF86 Data Retention and Destruction)• 03-107 Refresher Training• 08-602 Audit Capability (incl. 08-602A 1 Automated Audit Trail, 08-602A 3 Audit Trail
Analysis)• 03-102 FSO Training• 01-304 Individual Culpability Reports• 01-206 Security Reviews (incl. 01-206B Contractor Reviews)• 01-302 Reports to be Submitted to the CSA (incl. 01-302G Change Conditions Affecting the
FCL)• 02-212 Consultants• 10-706 NATO Briefings
Vulnerability Assessments
• Top Ten Acute/Critical Vulnerabilities (59% of total):• 08-602 Audit Capability (incl. 08-602A 3 Audit Trail Analysis)• 02-200 - PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCES - General (incl. 02-200B Deny Access for Deny Revoke
or Suspension PCLs)• 08-202 Accreditation• 01-302 Reports to be Submitted to the CSA (incl. 01-302G Change Conditions Affecting the FCL)• 02-104 PCLs Required in Connection with the FCL• 02-201 Investigative Requirements• 08-305 Malicious Code• 01-303 Reports of Loss, Compromise, or Suspected Compromise• 08-311 Configuration Management• 05-309 Changing Combinations (incl. 05-309B Employee with Knowledge Combination Change)
Vulnerability Assessments
Top five deficiencies we’re seeing in System Security Plans:• SSP was incomplete or missing attachments• Inaccurate or incomplete configuration diagram• Sections in general procedures contradict protection profile• Integrity & availability not properly addressed• SSP was not tailored to the system
Top five vulnerabilities we’re seeing during visits:• Inadequate auditing controls• Security Relevant Objects not protected• Inadequate configuration management• Improper session controls• Identification & authentication controls
IT Vulnerabilities
CI Award• 20% of industry is reporting – Only 10% reporting “actionable” SCRs
Goal is 40% of industry reporting “actionable” SCRs• Cyber Incident reporting has doubled, still ~ three (3) percent
New CI awareness and analytical products
• Better define the threat• More timely, focused products -- individual company assessments• Expanded distribution of products• Pushing classified threat, including cyber• Deeper look into supply chain and unclassified subcontract vulnerabilities
New CI course, Thwarting the Enemy• 40,000 course completions in first year
CI Integration
• Training Initiatives • Two curriculum tracks for FSOs• American Council on Education (ACE) Credit Equivalency recommendations for
several courses• Two new awareness courses available outside of STEPP • Professionalization
Education and Training
Looking ahead
• Continuous Evaluation Pilot
• New CI Resources
• FSO Toolkit
• Call Center Transition
• Rating Matrix II
• Technology
OBMS
CAC/PKI
254 database
• Electronic Fingerprint
Social Media
@DSSPublicAffair
@TheCDSE
Like Us on facebook
15
16
Questions?