defending corporations and individuals in government investigations · 2019-07-27 · duties of...
TRANSCRIPT
Defending Corporations and Individuals in
Government Investigations
Ethics & Whistleblower Issues In Investigations
Daniel J. Fetterman
Mark P. Goodman
Reid Figel
Daniel Karson
Patrick Pericak
September 28, 2016
2
Overview
Part I: Definition of “Whistleblower”
Part II: Whistleblower Programs
Part III: Dealing with Whistleblowers
Part IV: Ethical Considerations in Representations
3
Part I: Definition of “Whistleblower”
Definition of Whistleblower
• Under Dodd-Frank, a “whistleblower” is defined as any person
who provides information relating to a violation of the securities
laws to the Securities and Exchange Commission or the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
• An individual may also qualify as a whistleblower under Dodd-
Frank if he or she reports a violation of the securities laws
internally and suffers employment retaliation as a result of doing
so.
• Under the False Claims Act, any person with evidence of fraud
against federal programs or contracts may file a qui tam suit.
Such persons are called “relators.”
4
Part II: Whistleblower Programs
5
6
Dodd-Frank & Sarbanes-Oxley
Dodd-Frank Act established several new whistleblower protections
for individuals employed in the financial services industry who
report violations of the securities or commodities laws.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act prohibits publicly traded companies from
taking adverse employment action against an employee who
provided information or assisted an investigation concerning a
violation of SOX, any SEC rule/regulation, or federal statute
relating to fraud against shareholders.
7
SEC & CFTC
The SEC and CFTC both have whistleblower programs that allow a
whistleblower to submit tips concerning violations of the
securities or commodities laws.
To participate in the SEC program, for example, an individual must
(1) voluntarily provide (2) original information that (3) leads to the
successful enforcement by the SEC in which (4) the SEC obtains
monetary sanctions totaling more than $1 million.
False Claims Act (Qui Tam Suits)
The FCA has a whistleblower program allowing for relators to file
claims on behalf of the federal government.
Qui Tam plaintiffs can receive between 15-30% of the total
recovery from the defendant, whether through a favorable judgment
or settlement.
8
9
SEC, CFTC, & FCA Programs:
Relevant Statistics
SEC Whistleblower Program (as of FY 2015)
• Paid more than $54 million to 22 whistleblowers since the program was created in
August 2011.
• In FY 2015 alone, more than $37 million was paid to eight whistleblowers. More
than 4,000 tips were submitted that year.
• Most ever awarded was $30 million to one individual in 2014.
CFTC Whistleblower Program (as of FY 2015)
• No awards in FY 2015, although one award granted in September 2015 is currently
on appeal.
• The office received 232 tips in FY 2015.
• In April 2016, CFTC awarded more than $10 million, the largest award made since
the inception of the program.
FCA (as of FY 2015)
• Lawsuits under the FCA have recovered more than $48 billion since 1986; $33
billion resulting from whistleblower suits (paying out $5.3 billion to relators)
• In 2015, the DOJ initiated 737 suits, 632 of which were based on whistleblower tips
10
Part III: Dealing with Whistleblowers
Duties of In-House Counsel
• Address claim immediately
• CLO and/or compliance officer assemble an investigation
team
• Investigation Team
• Identify witnesses documents to be collected and
preserved (for investigation and any potential litigation)
• Emphasize importance of maintaining confidentiality
• Reinforce that retaliation is not permitted and vigilantly
ensure it does not occur
• Provide Upjohn warning to whistleblower
11
Whistleblower Protection (Retaliation)
The definition of “adverse action” is expansive and can even include
disclosure of the whistleblower’s name.
– Under SOX, for example, an employee need only establish that the
employer’s action would have dissuaded a reasonable worker from
engaging in the protected activity.
– Employer can avoid liability by establishing it would have taken
the same adverse action absent the protected activity
Remedies include:
• Reinstatement;
• Double back pay;
• Compensation for any special damages including litigation costs and
reasonable attorneys’ fees
12
Investigating a Whistleblower
• It is lawful and ethical to research the public record:
– Federal and state, civil and criminal proceedings
– Judgments, liens, bankruptcies
– Business affiliations
– Property ownership
– Social network postings that do not require pretexting for
purposes of “friending”
– Media reports
13
Investigating a Whistleblower (cont’d)
• If the whistleblower is an employee, and the company has
relevant policies in force and in use acknowledged by
employees, the company may retrieve and examine:
– The contents of company issued computers
– Email in the company’s domain
– The employee’s use of the Internet through the company’s
server
– Telephone numbers called and received using the
company’s telephone exchange, which may be traceable to
identify persons called/calling
14
Investigating a Whistleblower (cont’d)
• Care should be taken to avoid allegations of whistleblower
intimidation or retaliation
• Strategies such as surveillance and interviews of prospective
witnesses should be undertaken and deployed only with care and
consideration for the consequences of disclosure
15
Part IV: Ethical Considerations in
Representation
16
Rules of Professional Responsibility
• Communication with person Represented by Counsel (Rule 4.2)
– (a) In representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate
or cause another to communicate about the subject of the
representation with a party the lawyer knows to be
represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the
lawyer has the prior consent of the other lawyer or is
authorized to do so by law.
17
Ethical Issues: Attorney Whistleblowers
• Part 205 (SOX) generally contemplates reporting material
violations “up the ladder”
• Under certain conditions, the Rules permit attorneys to submit
whistleblower reports.
• SEC conduct rule: lawyer may reveal confidential client
information to the SEC where he/she “reasonably believes
necessary” to:
• Prevent issuer from committing material violation likely
to cause substantial injury;
• Prevent issuer, in a SEC investigation or proceeding,
from committing perjury or perpetrating fraud;
• Rectify consequences of a material violation that
caused, or may cause, substantial injury
18
Relevant Ethical Rules & Opinions:
Comments & Opinions on ABA Guidelines
• Part 205 (SOX) provides that an attorney who complies in good
faith with that statute shall not be subject to inconsistent
standards imposed by any state or jurisdiction where he/she is
admitted to practice.
• However, questions persist as to whether this preemption
clause actually has preemptive effect.
• California
• New York
• Washington
19
Protecting Client Confidences
Model Rule 1.6:
• Permits disclosure of client information if the disclosure is
necessary “to establish a claim or defense on behalf of the
lawyer in a controversy between the lawyer and the client.”
ABA Formal Ethics Opinion:
• A wrongful termination claim is a “claim” within the meaning of
Model Rule 1.6.
– The vast majority of states have adopted this language
Courts in States with Model Rule 1.6:
• Because of this exception, the ethical rule regarding disclosure of
confidential information is not violated even if disclosure of client
confidences is necessary to bring the whistleblower claim.
20
Protecting Client Confidences Model Rule 1.13:
• Under many states’ rules, where in-house counsel becomes aware
of a violation of the law that is likely to result in substantial injury to
the company, she is permitted to reveal confidential information to
the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary, after she has
reported violations internally and the organization has failed to act.
States with More Restrictive Ethical Rules:
• District of Columbia, Michigan, and New York:
• Limits use of confidential information to claims involving a fee.
• Violated if confidences are disclosed by in-house counsel in the
course of litigating a whistleblower claim, unless in-house
counsel can show that some other exception applies, such as
the crime-fraud exception.
21
Reporting Ethical Violations to the
Appropriate Disciplinary Authority
• An attorney who violates his or her ethical obligations in pursuing
a whistleblower claim may face disciplinary proceedings.
• Model Rule 8.3(a): “A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has
committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that
raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty,
trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall
inform the appropriate professional authority.”
22
Ethical Issues: Whistleblower Awards
• Dodd-Frank:
• Eligible for a bounty ranging between 10 and 30% of
sanctions collected where SEC enforcement action leads to
recovery of more than $1 million
• SEC may split an award between multiple whistleblowers
• Unclear whether attorney can collect whistleblower bounty
• “Original information” does not include information obtained
through a privileged communication or in connection with
the legal representation of a client.
• Exceptions: Disclosure otherwise permitted by SEC attorney
conduct rules, applicable state attorney conduct rules, or
“otherwise.”
23
Legal and Ethical Considerations
Attorneys and Investigators must assure that investigative
strategies are lawful and ethical
• Hewlett Packard – 2006 – investigators seeking the source of
boardroom leaks unlawfully obtained telephone and bank records
through pretexts.
• Uber – 2015 – investigators contacted acquaintances and
colleagues of an antitrust plaintiff using improper pretexts to
acquire information. Meyer v. Kalanick and Uber 2016 WL
3981369 (SDNY 2016).
24