defamation and misc. free speech issues fall 2014 resources: harvard’s berkman center eff
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues
Fall 2014Resources:
Harvard’s Berkman Centerhttp://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/defamation
EFFhttp://www.eff.org/issues/bloggers/legal/liability/defamation
![Page 2: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Defamation
• Defamation required elements to prove:1. False statement of fact about plaintiff by
defendant2. Publication - communicated to a third party3. Damages the reputation of the plaintiff
• Defamation forms– Oral: slander– Written: libel
• Negligence standard, Gertz (1974)
![Page 3: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Can you defame someone with a true, dark secret?
A. YesB. No
0%0%
30
![Page 4: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
A defamatory tweet would be an example of
A. SlanderB. Libel
0%0%
30
![Page 5: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Defamation per se:
• If it’s defamation per se, proving harm to reputation is not required
• Per se categories:– disease;– criminal actions;– misconduct related to profession or business; – sexual misconduct.
• False statements involving these items are always actionable
![Page 6: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
If you are bring a lawsuit claiming the statement was defamation per se, you will not have to prove
A. That the statement was communicated to a third party
B. That the statement was false
C. That the statement harmed your reputation
D. All of the aboveE. None of the above
0% 0%0%0%0%
30
![Page 7: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Defenses, Exceptions to Defamation
• Is it a statement of fact?– Facts: capable of being objectively verified.
• Is it an opinion?– Generally, opinions are protected speech. – Stating false information ≠ opinion
• Other exceptions:– “merely” offensive statements
• The “Dumb Ass” example in Vogel v. Felice– “… if the meaning conveyed cannot by its nature be proved false”
– Hyperbole• Hustler v. Falwell
– Libel proof plaintiff
![Page 8: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Which of the following is NOT a per se category for defamation?
A. DiseaseB. HyperboleC. Criminal conductD. Business
misconductE. Sexual misconduct
0% 0%0%0%0%
30
![Page 9: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Defamation and public figures
• Public figure: celebrity, politician, public official– Examples: http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/examples-public-and-private-figures
• In addition to the three requirements, public figure plaintiff must prove that the defendant acted with actual malice (NY Times v. Sullivan)– Knowing that it was false or with active disregard to
statements truth.• Regular defamation tests merely for negligence
– Reasonably prudent person, reasonable care
– Ex. David Beckham’s $25 M suit against In Touch• http://
www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/feb/15/david-beckham-magazine-libel-judge
![Page 10: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Public figures who sue for defamation have an additional element to prove about the statement.
What is it?
A. the statement was communicated to a third party
B. the statement was falseC. the statement was
made with actual maliceD. the statement harmed
his/her reputation.E. the statement was
made with negligence.
0% 0%0%0%0%
30
![Page 11: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Suppose that each of the following statements is untrue and was communicated to a third party. Is the statement defamation? Why?
1. “Bob smells bad.”2. “Alice is as dim as a 20 watt
bulb.”3. Nurse Ellen tells Nurse Sam
“Dr. Steve had a 3 margarita lunch before performing that surgery.”
4. “George took the money.”5. “Vivian has herpes.”6. “Charlie Sheen, Lindsey
Lohan called and she wants her smack back.”
7. “Bridget slept with the entire offensive line.”
8. “Bridget slept with Frank.”9. “I think Bridget smoked
weed at the party this weekend because I saw her coming out of her room, and when I went in I could smell it, and I found a roach.”
10. “Amy Winehouse had AIDs.”
![Page 12: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Can you sue Twitter & Facebook over a member’s defamatory
comments?
See § 230 of the Federal Communications Decency Act
http://www.eff.org/issues/bloggers/legal/liability/230
![Page 13: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Your former friend defames you on Instagram. Can you successfully sue Instagram as Instagram
was the online publisher?
A. YesB. No
0%0%
30
![Page 14: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
What Courtney Love can Teach Us about Defamation
• The first defamation lawsuit– http://
www.techdirt.com/articles/20090329/2229284297.shtml• Resolution: settlement
http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/04/courtney-love-settles-twitter-defamation-case/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_php=true&_type=blogs&emc=eta1&_r=1
![Page 15: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Courtney Love cont’d
• The second lawsuit:– http://
www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/courtney-love-sued-again-defamation-192727
– The case went to trial. January 2014 verdict for Love• http://
www.huffingtonpost.com/eugene-k-chow/why-courtney-love-twibel_b_4688426.html
![Page 16: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Courtney Love cont’d (2)
• The third lawsuit:– Pinterest comments
• include "you stole 36 bags of clothing on cctv" and "you stol;e 36 bags of my txtiles and designs and are still using my designs.“– http://
www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/courtney-love-hit-defamation-lawsuit-630423
– Feb 20, 2014, the judge ruled the case can continue http://www.spin.com/articles/courtney-love-dawn-simorangkir-libel-lawsuit-howard-stern/
![Page 17: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
@midnight – Yelp reviews
http://www.cc.com/video-clips/szn7jo/-midnight-chuck-e--cheese-s-or-jail---gang-banging-daddies
![Page 18: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Business Interests & Online Defamation
Unfavorable reviews of businesses:– Restaurant Yelps: http://nyti.ms/fII6iP– T & J Towing v. Kurtz, Facebook group: Kalamazoo Residents against T&J Towing
• http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2010/tj-towing-v-kurtz-weve-got-court-documents • Update & what is S.L.A.P.P.? http://nyti.ms/d7C2so
– Trip advisor: Dirtiest hotels list• http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/264642/Libel+Defamation/Sixt
h+Circuit+Affirms+Dirtiest+Hotel+Defamation+Ruling
Unfavorable tweets against businesses:– “Worst car dealership in the world”
• http://www.citmedialaw.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-12-04-Route%206%20Hyundai%20Demand.pdf
• http://www.citmedialaw.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-12-19-Alascio%20Response.pdf
– Apartment Mold: • http://consumerist.com/2010/01/twitter-defamation-lawsuit-dismissed.html
![Page 19: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
What is your opinion? A blogger should get the same protections as a traditional journalist.
A. Strongly AgreeB. AgreeC. Somewhat AgreeD. NeutralE. Somewhat DisagreeF. DisagreeG. Strongly Disagree
0% 0% 0%0%0%0%0%
30
![Page 20: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Bloggers as Journalists
• In the past, some courts have been hesitant to extend protections to bloggers.
• A recent decision may change that– Obsidian Finance Group v. Cox, 9th Circuit 2014• “The protections of the First Amendment do not turn
on whether the defendant was a trained journalist … As the Supreme Court has accurately warned, a First Amendment distinction between the institutional press and other speakers is unworkable.”
![Page 21: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Misc. Free Speech Issue:Anonymous Speech
• Anonymous publishing as a First Amendment right – McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission US S. Ct
1995– http://gilc.org/speech/anonymous/
• Online speech, accomplished using remailers– A series of servers that strip our identifying info &
sub in anonymous code or random numbers.(chained remailing)
![Page 22: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Does the First Amendment give you the right to speak anonymously online?
• Yes, but you do not have the right to speak falsely & injuriously.
• example below:
![Page 23: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Misc. Free Speech Issue:Students’ right to free speech
• “Faked” profiles– Mix of rulings
• Fake MySpace profile for a Texas principal Draker v. Schreibner• Facebook parody profile of principal Trosch by high school student Layshock v.
Hermitage School District• 14 y o middle school student created fake MySpace J.S. v. Blue Mountain
School• http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2012/03/suspension_for_1.htm
– Application of Tinker v. Des Moines (1969 US S. Ct. case). Black armbands & school ban• Students are persons under the Constitution• Rights not left at the school house gate• School must base decision on the likelihood of disruption of education
environment and intrusion of others.
![Page 24: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Students rights cont’d
• Fraser standard (1986) student lewd speech– distinguishing "vulgar" speech from the pure
"political" speech in Tinker • Hazelwood standard (1988) school paper case– “educators do not offend the First Amendment by
exercising editorial control over the style and content of student speech in school-sponsored expressive activities so long as their actions are reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns."
![Page 25: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Finkel v. Dauber
• 2010, NY case
• Secret Facebook group
– Victim of the bullying sues for defamation
– http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2010/07/private_faceboo.htm
– Outcome?
![Page 26: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Free speech challenges for student speech consider
A. The kind of speech (political, vulgarity)
B. The likelihood of disruption to the academic environment
C. The rights of those around the student
D. All of the aboveE. Nothing. Students do not
have free speech rights
0% 0%0%0%0%
30
![Page 27: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Misc. Free Speech Issue:Employee’s right to free speech
Article http://www.hrexaminer.com/is-there-free-speech-at-work/ • Some right to discuss working conditions
– EMT fired; found firing was improper• http://nyti.ms/djca6U
• Distinguish conditions discussion from mere venting– NJ first grade teacher properly fired for saying she “felt like a warden
overseeing future criminals” • http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/01/tenured_school_1.htm
– Bartender example (see next slide)• http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/22/technology/employers-social-media-policies-come-under-regulatory-scrutiny.html?pagewanted=all
![Page 28: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Bartender, unhappy about receiving no raise in 5 years, posts on Facebook that his customers are rednecks and hopes
“they choke on glass as they drive home drunk.” Classify this.
A. Discussion of working conditions
B. Personal venting 0%0%
30
![Page 29: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Free Speech Issue: When beliefs contradict law
• Amish stance on technology adoption.
• Wisconsin v. Yoder exemption for school
• What about requiring the Amish to use “technology”?– Mandatory, reflective traffic triangles on buggies– Traffic triangles. Watch:
• http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/01/02/amish-sects-buggies-traffic-burden-for-some-kentucky-residents/
![Page 30: Defamation and Misc. Free Speech Issues Fall 2014 Resources: Harvard’s Berkman Center EFF](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649dd15503460f94ac68d9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Opinion: Should the Amish be required to display the triangles when on public roads?
A. YesB. NoC. I’m conflicted (unsure)
0%0%0%
30
Result: Kentucky Supreme Court
Reasoning: