deer - overabundance

23
DEER - OVERABUNDANCE Impacts on Forest Management & Ecology

Upload: others

Post on 21-Oct-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE

DEER - OVERABUNDANCEImpacts on Forest Management & Ecology

Page 2: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE
Page 3: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE

Failure of regeneration

Increased regeneration costs

Reduced tree and stand growth rates and timber productivity

Altered composition of plant communitiesTreesUnderstory plants

Altered composition of animal communities

Forestry Impacts

Page 4: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE

Ideal habitat – landscape mosaic – farm & forest

CroplandFieldsShrublandsMixed hardwood and conifer forest with patches of different ages, especially with forest <10 years old

Increased deer populations = Increased impacts

Page 5: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE

• Regeneration failure

• Increased costs of regeneration

• Reduced growth and productivity

• Altered tree composition

Page 6: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE
Page 7: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE

Unsustainable forest management

Certification standards not met

Failure of Regeneration

Page 8: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE

3 years following clear cut• successful regeneration• grassy field

Page 9: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE

To ensure adequate composition and stocking

Repeated silvicultural treatments

Protection of regenerationFencingTree sheltersBud capsRepellents

Increased regeneration costs

Page 10: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE

• Fencing (exclosures) may be only recourse for protecting valuable landscape features

• Woven wire and electric fences• Very expensive to install and

require maintenance

Fencing

Page 11: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE

Tube Shelters

Page 12: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE

Bud Caps

Page 13: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE

Work best when changed frequently, where deer densities are fairly low, and when integrated into a larger damage abatement program.

Repellants

Page 14: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE

Regeneration failure & delayed establishment

Understocked stands – less production

Slower growth following browsing

Less productive species composition

Reduced Growth Rates and Productivity

Page 15: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE

Fools Creek, PA5 years following clear cut10 deer/mi2 and 65 deer/mi2

Page 16: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE

Natural regenerationPreferential browsing can influence compositionSome tree species are preferred, some less favored, some generally avoided

Artificial regenerationPreferential browsing can alter compositionPlant species unpalatable to deer

Altered Composition of Plant Communities - Trees

Page 17: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE

Preferred Browse:• hemlock, white cedar • maples, basswood, birches, oaks• aspen• many other trees, depending on

availability of preferred species

Generally not preferred:•spruce, beech, red pine

Page 18: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE

Barren ground, grasses and sedges, ferns

Lilies and orchids

Endangered species

Altered composition of plant communities –Understory Plants

Page 19: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE

Kemp – 1900 and 1990

Page 20: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE
Page 21: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE

Thomas Meyer, WDNR

• Canada yew, witch hazel, dogwood, and others• Many herbaceous plants, especially lilies and orchids

Browse on forest shrubs and herbaceous plants

Page 22: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE

Altered habitat – food and shelter – plant community composition and structure

e.g. shrub nesting birds

e.g. species preferring cedar or hemlock

Altered Composition of Animal Communities

Page 23: DEER - OVERABUNDANCE