deep weathering in the lofoten-vesterålen area first ... og...
TRANSCRIPT
Ha
Marco Brönner1, Odleiv Olesen1, Einar Dalsegg1, Dag Bering2, Ola Fredin1, Bart Hendriks1, Christian Magnus2, Karl Fabian1, Terje Solbakk2, Jon Arne Øverland2, Jan Steinar Rønning1 & Thomas Møller1
1) Geological Survey of Norway (NGU), NO-7491 Trondheim2) Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD), P.O. Box 600, NO-4003 Stavanger
Ha
Deep weathering in the Lofoten-Vesterålen area
– first results from the NGU-NPD TWIN Project
~14 m
9001 - near Oppeid
0.17 SI *10-3
0.56 SI *10-3
~20 m
from www.Norgei3D.no
INTRODUCTION
Deep weathering in Norway commonly occurs alongstructurally defined weakness zones and thus can play adecisive role in the genesis of the relief of a landscape.Glacial erosion and various tectonic processes with faultblock rotation and uplift have often been inferred toexplain the relief of the landscape in Lofoten andVesterålen, but especially recent studies have shown thatthese processes are not sufficient to explain themagnitude and variation in relief. The numerous soundsand islands not only in the Lofoten-Vesterålen area, butalong the Norwegian coast could to a large extent beconditioned by exhumation and erosion of weatheredbasement. Furthermore, remnants of weatheredbasement have an increasing impact on society andeconomy in Norway as they can be responsible, on theone hand, for rock avalanches and tunnel hazards butalso have a considerable potential for groundwater andhydrocarbon reservoirs.In the joint NGU-NPD project ‘Tropical Weathering In
Norway’ (TWIN), both institutes want to investigate thisphenomenon with the aim of gaining a better knowledgeof the processes related to deep weathering in Norway.The development of new mapping and dating techniquesfor weathered rocks is considered as an important factorwithin this project.
Sch
emat
icdia
gra
m o
fth
egeo
logic
alev
olu
tion
oftr
opic
alw
eath
erin
gin
Fen
nosc
andia
(modifie
dfr
om
Lid
mar
-Ber
gst
röm
1995)
from www.Norgei3D.no
from www.Norgei3D.no
HAMARØYA
VESTVÅGØYA
ANDØYA
Resistivity measurementson Andøya
Sampling of fresh and weathered basement rocks for paleomagnetic dating at the Ramså field on Andøya
Profile 2Profile 2
Profile 3
HADSELØYA
from www.Norgei3D.no
NØSV
Resistivity Profiles 1 & 2 clearly show the flanks of the Mesozoic basin, whereas Profile 3 mainly reflects the rugose top of a probably weathered shallow gabbro intrusion. The top basement on Profile 1 shows deep trenches and appears craggy, which indicates deep weathering. The weathered basement rock is of clay-rich material (Fig. 1b), cropping out on the beach and in the river bed in the southern Ramså field .
Quarry with deeply weathered mangerites discovered in the 1980s(Photo: P.-R. Neeb)
Unweathered low magnetic basement rock with its deep weathered analog aside.
A c. 20 m thick weathered basement rock is exposed in a quarry and resistivity
measurements indicate a thickness of locally more than 100 m. The weathered
rock is of grainy structure accompanied by large core-stones which are also partly visible in the resistivity data.
The texture of the primary rock is well preserved, which confirms the in-situ character of the outcrop.
Core-stone within the weathered basement rock
In the 1980s an open quarry with deeply weathered mangerite was discovered by NGU (Fig. 3b). The
material was used by local farmers to construct and maintain gravel roads. Resistivity data indicate a
significant irregular shaped top basement with large weakness zones, likely to be due to weathered
basement. Further sites with deeply weathered rocks were observed near by (Fig. 3a). Here one sample
was obtained from a gravelly weathered locality. The sample was measured for porosity and permeability,
giving values of 24.3 % and 291 mD at 20 bar NCP/ 20C.
weakness zones oflow resistivity
3b
STATUS
During fieldwork in the summer of 2009,known sites with deep weathering wererevisited on Andøya and Vestvågøya and newsites were found on Hamarøya and Haseløya.Two sites on Hadseløya and Hamarøya wereopen quarries with observable thicknesses ofc. 14 and c. 20 m of deeply weathered rocks.The texture of the primary crystallinebasement rock was very well preserved onboth sites. The rocks on Hadseløya appearedto be weathered rather homogeneously withonly a few core-stones, whereas on Hamarøyathere is a ‘conglomerate’ of core-stones withweathered rocks in between. Samples fordating and chemical and petrophysicalanalysis were collected from all the sites. Forthe major four locations, resistivitymeasurements were also carried out.All observed major deep-weathering locationsin the Lofoten-Vesterålen area occur in ratherflat areas, where erosion is considered to beminimal. Considering a generally muchgreater amount of erosion in the mountains,deep weathering is likely to have had aconsiderable impact on the topography of theNorwegian landscape.
The grainy product of the
deep weathering at an open
quarry on Hadseløya is seen
as a c. 14 m thick pile of
rather homogenous material
with only a few remaining
core-stones (Fig. 2a). The
texture of the primary rock is
well preserved, which
confirms the in-situ character
of the outcrop. Resistivity
profiling points to even larger
amounts of weathered rock
with thicknesses of locally
more than 100 m and a much
wider geographic extend. For
paleomagnetic dating,
oriented samples were
collected from both fresh and
weathered rocks (Figs. 2b &
2c)
3a
2a2c
2b
The project involves mineral-ogical, chemical and petro-physical characterisation ofknown occurrences of deepweathering, as well as thedevelopment and testing ofAr/Ar and paleomagnetic agedating techniques together withgeomorphological and geo-physical mapping tools. Thestudy will provide a connectionbetween geomorphologicalelements present along theNorwegian coast both onshoreand offshore.
4a
4b
4c
1a
1b
Mesozoicsedimentsbasement
Mesozoicsediments
W E
WE
NE
SW
NW SE
WE
fresh bedrock
weathered gabbro ?
fresh bedrock
deep-weathered basement
from www.Norgei3D.no
Resistivity Profiles 1 & 2 clearly show the flanks of the Mesozoic basin, whereas Profile 3 Resistivity Profiles 1 & 2 clearly show the flanks of the Mesozoic basin, whereas Profile 3 Resistivity Profiles 1 & 2 clearly show the flanks of the Mesozoic basin, whereas Profile 3 Resistivity Profiles 1 & 2 clearly show the flanks of the Mesozoic basin, whereas Profile 3 Resistivity Profiles 1 & 2 clearly show the flanks of the Mesozoic basin, whereas Profile 3 Resistivity Profiles 1 & 2 clearly show the flanks of the Mesozoic basin, whereas Profile 3 Resistivity Profiles 1 & 2 clearly show the flanks of the Mesozoic basin, whereas Profile 3 Resistivity Profiles 1 & 2 clearly show the flanks of the Mesozoic basin, whereas Profile 3 Resistivity Profiles 1 & 2 clearly show the flanks of the Mesozoic basin, whereas Profile 3 Resistivity Profiles 1 & 2 clearly show the flanks of the Mesozoic basin, whereas Profile 3
Profile 1
1c
Mesozoicsediments
Deep-weatheredbasement ?