decree of the director general of marine, · pdf filearisetiarso soemodinoto, ph.d., the...
TRANSCRIPT
i
i
MINISTRY OF MARINE AFFAIRS AND FISHERIESDIREcTORATE GENERAl OF MARINE, cOASTS AND SMAll ISlANDS
DIREcTORATE FOR cONSERVATION OF AREA AND FISH SPEcIES
Jl. Medan Merdeka Timur No. 16Gedung Mina Bahari III, lt. 10, Jakarta Pusat 10110
Telp/Fax : (021) 3522045
© 2012
ISBN : 978-602-98450-8-2
DEcREE OF THE DIREcTOR GENERAl OF MARINE, cOASTS AND SMAll ISlANDS NUMBER KEP.44/KP3K/2012
cONcERNING
TEcHNIcAl GUIDElINES FOR EVAlUATING THE MANAGEMENT EFFEcTIVENESS OF AQUATIc, cOASTS AND SMAll ISlANDS
cONSERVATION AREAS (E-KKP3K)
ii Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
iiTe
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
iii
iii
This Technical Guidelines was written by the Working Group for Development of Guidelines for Evaluating Aquatic Conservation Areas Management Effectiveness at the Directorate for Conservation of Area and Fish Species (KKJI), Directorate General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands, Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries. The Working Group members were:
1. Drs. Riyanto Basuki, M.Si, Deputy Director for Area Conservation, KKJI. 2. Suraji, SP, M.Si, Head of Area Protection and Conservation Section, KKJI. 3. Arisetiarso Soemodinoto, Ph.D., The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Indonesia Marine Program. 4. Handoko Adi Susanto, D.Sc., USAID Marine Protected Areas Governance (MPAG) Program. 5. Irfan Yulianto, M.Si, Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) Indonesia Marine Program. 6. M. Khazali, M.Si, Conservation International (CI) Indonesia. 7. Ir. Sudarsono Kimpul, World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Indonesia.
Suggested citationDirectorate for Conservation of Area and Fish Species (2012). Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K). Jakarta: Directorate for Conservation of Area and Fish Species, Directorate General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands, Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, ix + 61 pp.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Contributions from the following, either direct or indirectly, are greatly appreciated. Apologies for those who are not mentioned due to limited space.
1. Dr. Sudirman Saad, M.Hum, Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands (KP3K). 2. Ir. Sri Atmini, M.Sc, Secretary to the Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands. 3. Dr. Toni Ruchimat, M.Sc, Director for Conservation of Area and Fish Species (KKJI). 4. Ir. Agus Dermawan, M.Si, Director for Utilization of Small Islands. 5. Dr. Subandono Diposaptono, M.Eng, Director for Marine, Coasts and Small Islands Spatial Planning. 6. Ir. M. Eko Rudianto, M.Bus.IT, Director for Marine and Coasts Affairs. 7. Ir. Ansori Zawawi, M.Si, MM, Director for Coastal Community Empowerment and Business Development. 8. Syamsulbahri Lubis, A.Pi, MM, Deputy Director for Area and Fish Species Utilization, KKJI. 9. Ir. Ahsanal Kasasiah, M.Agr.Bus, Deputy Director for Conservation Data, Information and Network, KKJI. 10. Dr. Pamuji Lestari, Deputy Director for Conservation of Fish, KKJI. 11. Ir. Yulita Wismaneli, Head of Monitoring & Evaluation Section, KP3K. 12. Ir. Iriawanti, Auditor of Inspectorate III. 13. Dr. Yesaya Mau, Head of National Aquatic Conservation Area Office (BKKPN) Kupang. 14. Dr. Ahmad Aris, Head of National Aquatic Conservation Area Office (LKKPN) Pekanbaru. 15. Raimundus Nggajo, ST, M.Si, Head of Utilization and Surveillance Section BKKPN Kupang.16. Agus Widayanto, S.Sos, Head of Conservation Area Utilization Section, KKJI. 17. Rofi Alhanif, M.Sc, Head of Conservation Network Section, KKJI. 18. Cora Mustika, A.Pi, MM, Head of Fish Species Conservation Design Section, KKJI. 19. Dr. Firdaus AK, M.Sc, Head of Conservation Area Design Section, KKJI. 20. Suko Wardhono, A.Pi, MM, Head of Office Administration, KKJI. 21. Sarmintohadi, M.Si, Head of Fish Species Protection and Conservation Section, KKJI. 22. Asri Nurhayati, Head of Reporting Section, Secretariat of Director General KP3K. 23. Ir. M. Saefudin, M.Si, Staff of KKJI. 24. Leny Dwihastuty, S.Pi, Staff of KKJI. 25. Yusuf Arif Affandy, ST, Staff of KKJI. 26. Yusra, S.Si, M.Si, Staff of KKJI. 27. A. Darwis, S.Sos, Staff of KKJI. 28. Muschan Ashari, S.Hut, Staff of KKJI. 29. Ahmad Sofiullah, S.Pi, Staff of KKJI. 30. Anita Setianingsih, M.Si, Staff of KKJI. 31. Amehr Hakim, M.Si, Staff of KKJI. 32. Ana Rojayati, S.Pi, Staff of KKJI. 33. Sinta Agustina, ST, Staff of Inspectorate III. 34. Ugeng Wijanarko, A.Md, Staff of Monitoring & Evaluation Section KP3K. 35. Helena Yusfik, S.TP, ME, Staff of Monitoring & Evaluation Section KP3K. 36. Susi Susanti, S.St.Pi, Staff of Monitoring & Evaluation Section KP3K. 37. Jeffry Syam, SH, Staff of Legal Section KP3K. 38. A. Boby Yefry Adi Rianto, S.Pi, Staff of BKKPN Kupang. 39. Yudi Herdiana, M.Si, WCS Indonesia Marine Program. 40. Ir. M. Imran Amin, TNC. 41. Dr. Budy Wiryawan, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB). 42. Dr. Ir. Fernando Dangeubun, M.Si, IPB. 43. Rony Megawanto, ST., MIDEC, USAID-MPAG. 44. Ir. Anton Wijonarno, WWF Indonesia.
Financial support for formulating the Technical Guidelines (and printing of this booklet through The Nature
Conservancy Indonesia Marine Program) was provided by Marine Protected Areas Governance (MPAG) program, an
initiative of USAID/Mission to Indonesia.
iv Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
ivTe
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
v
vFOREWORD
Director for Conservation of Area and Fish SpeciesMinistry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries
Conservation is of global concern today, and is a strategic
issue for several countries, including Indonesia. With
an abundant fish resource potential, Indonesia has
to be able manage these resources effectively and
sustainably for the good of its people. Management of
fish resources in Indonesia was initiated in 1990 with the passing of
Law 5 on conservation of biological resources and their ecosystems.
However, a more specific legal umbrella for conservation of fish
resources did not come until 2004, when Law 31/2004 on fisheries was
passed, and subsequently amended by Law 45/2009. Further, the fish resource conservation
mandate is outlined in Government Regulation 60/2007, which was followed by other technical
regulations in the form of guidelines and ministerial regulations. Since the establishment of this
legal umbrella, conservation of fish resources in Indonesia has intensified.
National and local government initiatives in fish resource conservation had created no less
than 16 million hectares of marine conservation areas by the end of 2012. The Indonesian
government has committed to increasing this expanse of marine conservation area to 20 million
hectares by 2020. This commitment is in keeping with the commitment to making management
of these areas more effective.
Preparation of these Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness
of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas is an initiative of the Directorate for
Conservation of Area and Fish Species towards achieving this target of effective management.
These guidelines are the result of the adoption and combination of a number of internationally
accepted methods for evaluating the effectiveness of the management of conservation, such as
‘Guidebook of Natural and Social Indicators for Evaluating Marine Protected Area Management
Effectiveness’, ‘Score Card to Assess Progress in Achieving Management Effectiveness
Goals for Marine Protected Areas’, ‘Guide for Improving Marine Protected Area Management
Effectiveness in Indonesia’, and others.
REMARKS
Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries
The Government of Indonesia has committed to establish 20 million hectare of aquatic (marine) conservation areas in 2020. This commitment certainly must be accompanied by efforts to effectively manage those areas so they able to provide great benefits to the stakeholders, particularly
local communities, and the conserved biodiversity resources.
Effectively managed conservation area is in agreement with the Ministry of Marine Affaris and Fisheries’ program aiming at generating social-economic and cultural benefits for people and sustainability of
resources. Furthermore, conservation areas can also be developed to embrace principles of blue economy, i.e. poverty eradication, social inclusiveness, and resources sustainability.
I therefore welcome this Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas which is known as E-KKP3K Guidelines. I also applaud the efforts of Directorate for Conservation of Area and Fish Species (KKJI), in collaboration with a consortium of international non-governmental organizations under Marine Protected Areas Governance (MPAG) program, to produce the Guidelines. Besides timely, the Guidelines will close the gap of lacking of tools that can be used to evaluate management performance and effectiveness of aquatic (marine) conservation areas comprehensively.
I really hope that this E-KKP3K Guidelines can be adopted by decision-makers as standard tools for evaluating the performance of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas in Indonesia, and can simultaneously be utilized by managers and planners at site level to prioritize activities for managing the area effectively.
Finally, I hope this manual will contribute to the effective and sustainable management of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas in Indonesia.
Dr. Sudirman Saad
vi Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
viTe
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
vii
vii
This manual contains the procedures or guidelines for evaluating the effectiveness of the
sustainable management of marine conservation areas. This manual is expected to be used
by policy makers as an instrument for evaluating the performance of marine, coast and small
islands conservation areas in Indonesia, and as a tool for establishing development priorities for
the effective management of these areas. At the macro level, the guidelines are intended for use
by the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries to evaluate the effectiveness of the management
of marine conservation areas across Indonesia. At the macro level, the guidelines can be used
for self-evaluation of the effectiveness of management of a particular marine conservation area,
and for making plans to improve management performance.
The guidelines divide effective management of an aquatic, coasts and small islands
conservation area into five levels. Starting from the lowest level of management, these are:
Level 1 (red), Level 2 (yellow), Level 3 (green), Level 4 (blue) and Level 5 (gold). These levels
are determined by 17 (seventeen) criteria, which are elucidated in 74 (seventy-four) questions.
These parameters are used in the process of evaluating effectiveness to assess the status of
the area’s reserves, institutions, management and zoning plans, and infrastructure. The scope
of the evaluation covers management, conservation/resources, and socio-economic-cultural
aspects that are relevant to conservation area management.
Preparation of these guidelines went through a process of discussions and workshops, which
involved stakeholders to get their input and feedback. Trials were also conducted in selected
locations, such as Pesisir Selatan District, Batang District, and all National Marine Conservation
Areas. During these processes, a great deal of input was gathered and revisions were made
to create the guidelines that can now be used as the manual for evaluating management
effectiveness. On 9 October 2012, the Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands
signed Decree Number Kep.44/KP3K/2012 which ratified the issue of these guidelines.
Accompanying software is now being developed to facilitate actual evaluations in the field. This
software is expected to be operational in the near future.
In follow up to the preparation of this manual, in 2013 the Directorate for Conservation of
Area and Fish Species will perform evaluations of the effectiveness of the management of all
aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas in Indonesia using this instrument. The
conservation area deemed to have the most effective management will be rewarded with a KKP
Award. The activities planned for this year’s agenda should motivate the managers of these
conservation areas to continue to work hard to create conservation areas that are effectively and
sustainably managed. As well as the KKP Award, another key output of these activities is the
recommended management priorities for the all conservation areas that have been evaluated.
We would like to thank everyone for their contribution to the preparation of this manual, in
particular the partner NGOs in the Marine Protected Areas Governance (MPAG) consortium
for their hard work. We welcome constructive feedback and input to improve these guidelines,
and hope that this manual will contribute to the effective and sustainable management of
conservation areas in Indonesia.
Dr. Toni Ruchimat
viii Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
viii
Tech
nica
l Gui
delin
es fo
r Eva
luat
ing
the
Man
agem
ent E
ffect
iven
ess
of A
quat
ic, C
oast
s an
d Sm
all I
slan
ds C
onse
rvat
ion
Area
s (E
-KKP
3K)
ix
ixTAbLE Of CONTENTS
Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................Remarks .........................................................................................................................foreword ........................................................................................................................Table of Contents ..........................................................................................................List of figure ..................................................................................................................List of Table ....................................................................................................................
Chapter 1 – Introduction ............................................................................................... A. Background .......................................................................................................... B. Purpose and Objectives ....................................................................................... C. Scope ................................................................................................................... D. Organization of the Technical Guidelines ............................................................. List of Abbreviations and Terms ...............................................................................
Chapter II – Theoretical framework ............................................................................. A. Background .......................................................................................................... B. Literature Background to the Development of the Technical Guidelines .............. C. Legal Basis ...........................................................................................................
Chapter III – Method for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas .......................................................... A. General ................................................................................................................ B. Implementer ......................................................................................................... C. Timing ................................................................................................................... D. Evaluation Tools and Methods .............................................................................
Chapter IV – Reporting .................................................................................................. A. Evaluation data Collected .................................................................................... B. Analysis ................................................................................................................ C. Conclusions .......................................................................................................... D. Report Structure ...................................................................................................
Chapter V – Recommendations and follow Up Action .............................................. A. Recommendations ............................................................................................... B. Follow Up Action ..................................................................................................
Chapter V – Conclusion ................................................................................................
Appendix: List of Score Cards for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas ........................................... A. Background Information of the Conservation Area .............................................. B. Evaluation Score Cards: • Red (Level 1): Conservation Area Initiated ...................................................... • Yellow (Level 2): Conservation Area Established ............................................ • Green (Level 3): Conservation Area Managed Minimally ................................ • Blue (Level 4): Conservation Area Managed Optimally ................................... • Gold (Level 5): Self-Reliant Conservation Area ...............................................
References ......................................................................................................................
LIST Of fIGURES
Title
The basic principles of evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas .................................................
Steps in evaluating management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation area ...............................................................................
LIST Of TAbLES
Title
Status of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas in Indonesia (per July 2012) ................................................................................
Strategies and Activity Programs included in the governance, area resources, and socio-economic and cultural aspects of the management of a conservation area ........................................................................................
Criteria used for evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas at the macro level ....................
Recommended structure of a report on the findings of an evaluation of the management of an aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation area ......
Page
8
32
Page
2
4
6
36
Number
1
2
Number
1
2
3
4
Pageiiiivv
viiiixix
113345
6678
1010101011
3535353536
373737
38
3940
4145495260
61
x Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
xTe
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
xi
xiDECREE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF MARINE, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS
NUMBER KEP.44/KP3K/2012
CONCERNING
TECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING THE MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS OF AQUATIC, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS
CONSERVATION AREAS (E-KKP3K)
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF MARINE, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS
Considering: a. that for the purposes of evaluating the effectiveness of the sustainable management of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas, technical guidelines for evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas are required, using the indicators as established;
b. that this should be established by Decree of the Director General;In view of: 1. Law 31/2004 concerning Fisheries as amended by Law
45/2009 concerning Amendments to Law 31/2004 concerning Fisheries;
2. Law 32/2004 concerning Regional Governments as amended by Law 12/2008 concerning Amendments to Law 32/2004 concerning Regional Governments;
3. Law 26/2007 concerning Spatial Planning; 4. Law 27/2007 concerning Management of Coasts and Small
Islands; 5. Government Regulation 60/2007 concerning Conservation of Fish
Resources; 6. Government Regulation 62/2010 concerning Use of Outermost
Small Islands; 7. Government Regulation 64/2010 concerning Disaster Mitigation
in Coasts and Small Islands; 8. Presidential Regulation 47/2009 concerning the Formation and
Organization of State Ministries as amended by Presidential Regulation 91/2011 concerning the Third Amendment to Presidential Regulation 47/2009 concerning the Formation and Organization of State Ministries;
9. Presidential Regulation 5/2010 concerning 2010-2014 Medium-Term National Development Plan;
10. Presidential Regulation 24/2010 concerning the Position, Tasks and Functions of State Ministries and the Organizational Structure, Duties and Functions of State Ministry Echelon I Personnel as amended by Government Regulation 92/2011 concerning the Second Amendment to Presidential Regulation 24/2010 concerning the Position, Tasks and Functions of State Ministries and the Organizational Structure, Duties and Functions of State Ministry Echelon I Personnel;
11. Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number PER.17/MEN/2008 concerning Conservation Areas of Coasts and Small Islands;
12. Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number PER.02/MEN/2009 concerning the Procedure for Establishing Aquatic Conservation Areas;
13. Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number PER.30/MEN/2010 concerning the Aquatic Conservation Area Management and Zoning Plans.
14. Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number PER.15/MEN/2012 concerning the 2010-2014 Strategic Plan of the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries;
15. Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Decree Number KEP.24/MEN/2002 concerning Procedure and Process for Legal Drafting within the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries;
DECREES:To enact : DECREE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF MARINE,
COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS CONCERNING TECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING THE MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS OF AQUATIC, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS CONSERVATION AREAS.
FIRST : To enact Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas, hereinafter referred to as the E-KKP3K Technical Guidelines as set forth in the Appendix to this Decree of the Director General.
SECOND : The E-KKP3K Technical Guidelines as referred to in the FIRST paragraph are used as guidelines for evaluating the effectiveness of the sustainable management of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas using the indicators as established.
THIRD : The indicators established in the E-KKP3K Technical Guidelines as referred to in the SECOND paragraph consist of 5 (five) levels and 17 (seventeen) criteria, as follows:
xii Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
xii
Tech
nica
l Gui
delin
es fo
r Eva
luat
ing
the
Man
agem
ent E
ffect
iven
ess
of A
quat
ic, C
oast
s an
d Sm
all I
slan
ds C
onse
rvat
ion
Area
s (E
-KKP
3K)
xiii
xiiiFIFTH : This Decree of the Director General comes into force on the date
of its enactment.
Enacted in Jakarta On 9th October 2012
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF MARINE, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS
Signed
SUDIRMAN SAAD
Deemed a true copy of the originalHead of Legal Affairs, Organization and Public Relations Bureau
Achmad Satiri
FOURTH : Costs arising as a result of the enactment of this Decree of the Director General shall be borne by the Budget of the Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands, and other official, non-binding funding sources.
3
THIRD : The indicators established in the E-KKP3K Technical Guidelines as
referred to in the SECOND paragraph consist of 5 (five) levels and 17 (seventeen) criteria, as follows:
Level/Stage Criteria Number of Questions
Red (1)
Conservation Area Initiated
1 Initiative proposal
8 2 Area identification and
inventory 3 Reservation of
conservation area
Yellow (2)
Conservation Area Established
4 Management organizational unit and personnel
11
5 Management and zoning plans
6 Facilities and infrastructure to support management
7 Management funding support
Green (3)
Conservation Area Managed Minimally
8 Approval of management and zoning plans
21 9 Management standard
operating procedures (SOPs)
10 Implementation of management and zoning plans
11 Designation of Aquatic Conservation Area
Blue (4)
Conservation Area Managed Optimally
12 Boundary marking
28 13 Institutionalization 14 Resource management 15 Socio-economic and
cultural management
Gold (5)
Self-Reliant Conservation Area
16 Improving community welfare
6
17 Sustainable funding
FOURTH : Costs arising as a result of the enactment of this Decree of the Director General shall be borne by the Budget of the Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands, and other official, non-binding funding sources.
xiv Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
xiv
Tech
nica
l Gui
delin
es fo
r Eva
luat
ing
the
Man
agem
ent E
ffect
iven
ess
of A
quat
ic, C
oast
s an
d Sm
all I
slan
ds C
onse
rvat
ion
Area
s (E
-KKP
3K)
1
1
5
Appendix I: Decree of the Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands Number KEP.44/KP3K/2012 concerning Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K).
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
A. Background
Indonesia, as one of the largest archipelagos in the world, is blessed with a very
rich marine biodiversity. Recent studies indicate that more than 90 percent of the world’s coral species are found, and some only found, in our waters. Likewise, more than two-thirds of the world’s fish species are found, and some only found, in Indonesian waters.
If managed sustainably, this rich marine biodiversity could provide the renewable resources needed to support the country’s long-term economic development. Unfortunately, their use is far from optimal, and most marine environments and resources are simply exploited, with little or nothing done to conserve them to ensure they can be used sustainably in the long term. Aware of this, the government of the Republic of Indonesia intends to set aside a part of its marine area for conservation purposes.
At an international forum of the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP CBD) in March 2006 in Brazil, President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono said that the Indonesian government had committed to developing 10 million hectare of marine conservation area by 2010, and had committed to expand that area to 20 million hectares by 2020 (UNEP-WCMC, 2008). This declaration and commitment requires multi-stakeholder support because establishing and managing conservation areas should offer benefits that support sustainable fisheries, for the good of the welfare of communities, in particular marine and fishing communities, most of which fall within the category of poor communities. This expansion does not just mean expanding geographical area. Consistent related efforts are needed to create marine conservation areas that are managed effectively in order to conserve biodiversity and contribute to the welfare of local communities.
Conservation is a challenge and a necessity, as part of the effort to balance the economic needs of the community and the wish to conserve existing resources for the future. As of July 2012, marine conservation areas in Indonesia covered a total of 15.78 million hectares (Table 1). This figure exceeds the target of 15.5 million hectares of conservation area set in the 2010-2014 National Medium-Term Development Plan.
2 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
2Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
3
3
6
Table 1 – Status of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas in
Indonesia (per July 2012)
No. Category Total Area (ha) A Ministry of Forestry Initiated 32 4,694,947.55 1 Marine National Park 7 4,043,541.30 2 Marine Natural Tourism Park 14 491,248.00 3 Marine Wildlife Reserve 5 5,678.25 4 Marine Nature Reserve 6 154,480.00
B Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Initiated 76 11,089,181.97
1 Aquatic National Park 1 3,521,130.01 2 Aquatic Nature Reserve 3 445,630.00 3 Aquatic Tourism Park 6 1,541,040.20 4 Aquatic Conservation Area (Regional) 66 5,581,382.76 Total 108 15,784,129.52
To support the above initiative, sustainable management of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas has been made a part of two national strategic targets. First, sustainable conservation has been made one of the key performance indicators for marine and fisheries development. Second, sustainable conservation has been made a priority target of the Millennium Development Goals to help support fair development, as referred to in Presidential Instruction 3/2010 concerning Fair Development.
The indicators for sustainable management of marine conservation areas are interpreted to mean management that pays heed to principles of utilization and management that guarantee availability and sustainability though the continuous maintenance and improvement of the quality and biodiversity of existing resources. To measure sustainable management, indicators of the achievement of conservation area management have been established. The parameters used is the decree that reserves the area, management agencies, management plans, institutional strengthening (partners, networks and human resources), and management initiatives, management infrastructure and facilities. Management effectiveness is categorized into five stages, based on the above parameters: stage 1 (red) – the area has been reserved; stage 2 (yellow) – stage 1 + management agency formed; stage 3 (green) – stage 2 + institutional strengthening, infrastructure and core management; stage 4 (blue) – stage 3 + optimal management of conservation area; and stage 5 (gold) – stage 4 + sustainable funding mechanism (decree, contribution from non-governmental organizations).
These guidelines were developed as a manual to evaluate the effectiveness of sustainable management of individual conservation areas, using the established management indicators.
7
B. Purpose and Objectives
The purpose of developing these technical guidelines for evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas is to produce a standard for evaluating the achievement of the sustainable management of a particular conservation area, as referred to in the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulations Number PER.17/MEN/2008 concerning Conservation Areas of Coasts and Small Islands, Number PER.02/MEN/2009 concerning Procedure for Establishing Aquatic Conservation Areas, and Number PER.30/MEN/2010 concerning Aquatic Conservation Area Management and Zoning Plans.
The objectives of the Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas are as follows: (1) To provide an instrument that can be used by policy makers at the national level
to evaluate the performance of all aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas in Indonesia, and to set priorities for the effective management of these areas;
(2) To provide an instrument that can be used by managers and stakeholders for planning activities to improve management performance; and
(3) To provide an instrument that can be used by managers and stakeholders for evaluating the performance or level of management of a particular area.
C. Scope
The scope of these Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management
Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas includes national (macro) evaluation and site (micro) evaluation. The materials covered by the evaluation include management, conservation/resources, and socio-economic and cultural aspects that are relevant to management of conservation areas. Some relevant examples are shown in Table 2.
4 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
4Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
5
5
8
Table 2 – Strategies and Activity Programs included in the governance, area resources, and socio-economic and cultural aspects of the management of a conservation area
Aspect Strategies and Activity Programs
Management Human resource development Institutional management Infrastructure capacity building Development of community organizations/institutions
Development of partnerships Establishing an aquatic conservation area network Developing a sustainable funding system Monitoring and evaluation
Area resources Protecting fish habitats and populations Rehabilitating fish habitats and populations Research and development Use of fish resources Eco tourism and environmental services Surveillance and control Monitoring and evaluation
Socio-economic & cultural
Community socio-economic development Community empowerment Preservation of culture and traditions Monitoring and evaluation
D. Organization of the Technical Guidelines
This manual for evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and
small islands conservation areas contains procedures or standards for evaluating the performance of the sustainable management of a particular aquatic conservation area. Following is an outline of the content of each chapter: Chapter I – Introduction, including background, purpose and objectives, scope,
and organization of the technical guidelines. Chapter II – Theoretical framework for Effectiveness of the Management of
Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas, including an overview of the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas, which will act as the benchmark for the management, area resources, and socio-economic and cultural aspects, and implementation of the management of an aquatic conservation area by a management organization unit (national or local government) as a form of social responsibility to the public.
Chapter III – Method for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic,
Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas, which is a process for determining the effectiveness (outcomes) and impacts of activity programs against targets that will be achieved systematically and objectively. This evaluation seeks to explain why the outcomes, effects and impacts of activities are achieved or not. And whether the activities are effective, as targeted.
9
Chapter IV – Reporting, or the findings of the evaluation of the management
effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas based on the data collected and analyzed, and follow-up recommendations for the management of conservation areas. Reporting is done periodically and at various levels, or as needed.
Chapter V – Recommendations and Follow Up, contains the recommendations
and follow up for managers to implement in order to achieve an effective level of management.
Chapter VI – Conclusion.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND TERMS
Below are some of the common abbreviations and terms used in these guidelines for evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas: E-KKP3K: Efektivitas Pengelolaan Kawasan Konservasi Perairan, Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil (Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas)
Evaluation: a process for determining the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness and impacts of program activities against targets that are to be achieved systematically and objectively. This evaluation seeks to explain why the outputs, effects and impacts of activities are achieved or not.
Reporting: a key activity in development processes. Reporting is done to provide relevant and accurate data/information quickly to stakeholders as material for decision making in keeping with existing conditions, and for making relevant policies. Reporting is carried out regularly and at various levels.
Level Red: or stage 1 (conservation area initiated), and the area has been reserved by decree.
Level Yellow: or stage 2 (conservation area established) – stage 1 + management agency formed and management plan prepared.
Level Green: or stage 3 (conservation area managed minimally) – stage 2 + organizational strengthening and core management activities.
Level Blue: or stage 4 (conservation area managed optimally) – stage 3 + management of the conservation area running effectively.
Level Gold: or stage 5 (self-reliant conservation area) – stage 4 + sustainable funding mechanism (by decree, contributions from non-governmental organizations).
IKU KKP: Indikator Kinerja Utama Pembangunan Kelautan dan Perikanan (Marine and Fisheries Development Key Performance Indicators)
6 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
6Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
7
7
10
CHAPTER II THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
A. Background
Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation
Areas or E-KKP3K is a method of evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas that indicates the level or degree to which management of a conservation area has had a positive impact on the area’s biophysical resources and on the socio-economic and cultural aspects of the local community, which contributes to improving management performance.
On this basis, therefore, all management activities carried out, as well as having their own targets, must also have conservation and socio-economic and cultural targets, the achievement or outcomes of which are a logical consequence of an effective management activity.
E-KKP3K tools can be used to conduct an evaluation of the management effectiveness of conservation areas, including aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas in Indonesia. At the macro level, E-KKP3K tools are used by the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries to get a spatial view of the overall management effectiveness of all aquatic conservation areas in Indonesia; while at the micro level, these tools are used to self-evaluate the effectiveness of the management of a particular aquatic conservation area and to make plans to improve its management performance. Table 3 – Criteria used for evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic,
coasts and small islands conservation areas at the macro level
Level/Stage Criteria Number of Questions
Red (1)
Conservation Area Initiated
1. Initiative proposal
8 2. Area identification and inventory
3. Reservation of conservation area
Yellow (2)
Conservation Area Established
4. Management organizational unit and personnel
11 5. Management and zoning plans
6. Facilities and infrastructure to support management
7. Management funding support
Green (3)
Conservation Area Managed Minimally
8. Approval of management and zoning plans
21 9.
Management standard operating procedures (SOPs)
10. Implementation of management and zoning plans
11. Designation of Aquatic Conservation Area
Blue (4)
Conservation Area Managed Optimally
12. Setting area markers
28 13. Institutionalization 14. Resource management
15. Socio-economic and cultural management
Gold (5)
Self-Reliant Conservation Area
16. Improving community welfare 6
17. Sustainable financing
11
B. Literature Background to the Development of the Technical Guidelines
Conceptually, the development of these technical guidelines was based on
available literature (Hockings et al., 2000, 2006; Pomeroy et al., 2004; Staub & Hatziolos, 2004; White et al., 2006; Carter et al., 2010), in which evaluation of management effectiveness is seen as a way of evaluating one or several activities related to the management cycle of a conservation area, i.e. an overall evaluation of the inputs, processes, outputs, outcomes and impacts. Also, all stages of the development of these technical guidelines made reference to the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulations Number PER.02/MEN/2009 concerning the Procedure for Establishing Aquatic Conservation Areas, Number PER.30/MEN/2010 concerning Aquatic Conservation Area Management and Zoning Plans, and Number PER.17/MEN/2008 concerning Conservation Areas of Coasts and Small Islands. Based on analysis of these regulations, in general the stages of effective management of conservation areas are: (1) Conservation area is initiated; (2) Conservation area is established; (3) Conservation area is managed minimally; (4) Conservation area is managed optimally; and (5) Conservation area is managed effectively and is fully functional (self-reliant)
The combination of the above explains why there is little difference in the level of management between the proposed, which reflect more the maturity stage of a conservation area than an evaluation of the performance of each component in the management cycle, although in principle, the theoretical framework used does refer to Hockings et al. (2000, 2006). As will become apparent in the succeeding sub-chapters, use of this approach does make it easier to evaluate the progress towards effective management. Also, this ranking also roughly reflects the chronology of the management cycle. According to Kapos et al. (2008, 2009), management effectiveness can be equated with the outcomes of management intervention, which means that a conservation area will be deemed not effective as long the processes undertaken are limited to inputs, processes and outputs.
In the management of a conservation area, three interconnected principles must be considered: the area resources, the local socio-economic and cultural aspects, and the management aspect itself. These principles are shown in Figure 1.
8 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
8Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
9
9
12
Figure 1 – The basic principles of evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas
In their use, E-KKP3K tools adopt the principles as defined above, whereby the area resources and the local socio-economic and cultural aspects are a function of management. Thus, management initiatives and their effectiveness are a precondition for achieving the outcomes and impacts on the area resources and the socio-economic and cultural aspects of the local community, which means to be effective, management must be verified by these other two aspects. For example, enforcing the rules of a conservation area is a management activity, the effectiveness of which is indicated by an improvement in the condition of the area resources and reduced pressure on these resources as a result of positive support to the management of the area. Furthermore, there should be positive interconnection and verification between the area resources and socio-economic and cultural aspects as a further indicator of the effectiveness of the management of a conservation area.
C. Legal Basis
Law 5/1990 concerning Conservation of Biological Resources and their Ecosystems. Law 5/1994 concerning Ratification of the United Nations Convention on Biodiversity.
Law 31/2004 concerning Fisheries as amended by Law 45/2009 concerning Amendments to Law 31/2004 concerning Fisheries.
Law 32/2004 concerning Regional Governments as amended by Law 12/2008 concerning Amendments to Law 32/2004 concerning Regional Governments.
Law 26/2007 concerning Spatial Planning. Law 27/2007 concerning Management of Coasts and Small Islands Areas. Government Regulation 39/2006 concerning Procedures for Monitoring and Evaluating Implementation of Development Plans.
Government Regulation 60/2007 concerning Conservation of Fish Resources.
Management
Social-economic & culturalArea resources
13
Government Regulation 26/2008 concerning Spatial Plans for National Areas. Presidential Regulation 24/2010 concerning the Position, Tasks and Functions of State Ministries and the Organizational Structure, Duties and Functions of State Ministry Echelon I Personnel as amended by Government Regulation 92/2011 concerning the Second Amendment to Presidential Regulation 24/2010 concerning the Position, Tasks and Functions of State Ministries and the Organizational Structure, Duties and Functions of State Ministry Echelon I Personnel.
Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number PER.17/MEN/2008 concerning Conservation Areas of Coasts and Small Islands.
Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number 23/2011 concerning the Second Amendment to the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation 22/2008 concerning the Organization and Work Procedures of Technical Implementing Units for the Management of Coasts and Marine Resources.
Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number PER.02/MEN/2009 concerning Procedure for Establishing Aquatic Conservation Areas.
Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number PER.15/MEN/2010 concerning the Organization and Work Procedures of the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries.
Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number PER.30/MEN/2010 concerning Aquatic Conservation Area Management and Zoning Plans.
Convention of Biological Diversity Conference of the Parties to Decision X/31 on Protected Areas (Nagoya, 18-29 October 2010), Point B. Issues that need greater attention, Article 3 (Management Effectiveness) and Article 5 (marine protected areas, MPAs).
10 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
10Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
11
11
14
CHAPTER III
METHOD OF EVALUATING THE MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS OF AQUATIC, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS CONSERVATION AREAS
A. General
The E-KKP3K technical guidelines are used not only for the evaluation of
management performance, but also for self-evaluation, to generate constructive input for conservation area planning in order to improve management effectiveness.
B. Implementer
Evaluations using the E-KKP3K technical guidelines are carried out by a team of evaluators, with members as required. This team can consist of: 1. National government; 2. Local government; and 3. Independent evaluators.
At the macro level, the evaluation team is appointed by government based on their key tasks and functions. At the micro level, the evaluation team will depend on needs: (1) for internal and planning needs, and (2) for external needs with the participation of stakeholders.
For internal and planning needs, all team members come from the conservation area concerned, and include the head and management of the area and the planners. For external needs, the stakeholders in the evaluation team include representatives of the conservation area management team (for example the head and planners), and direct stakeholders such as representatives of fishers, tourism businesses, private companies, and universities. If necessary, the conservation area management team may appoint an independent team to conduct the evaluation.
C. Timing
Based on the fact that E-KKP3K tools are used to evaluate the stage and level of management, evaluations should be performed periodically over a set period of time. These evaluations are useful for planning to improve the management performance of a conservation area, so that each process at each stage of E-KKP3K management can be quickly achieved.
For management levels 1 (red) and 2 (yellow), annual evaluations until all processes at management level 2 (yellow) have been completed are recommended. For levels 3 (green) and 4 (blue), evaluations can be performed once every two to four years, with evaluations every two years strongly recommended to promote completion of all processes at level 3 (green) and/or some of the processes at level 4 (blue). For management level 5 (gold), evaluations every five years are recommended.
15
D. Evaluation Tools and Methods D1: Evaluation Tools
The E-KKP3K technical guidelines are a tool designed to evaluate the
performance and the management effectiveness of conservation areas in terms of their expected outcomes on institutional, area resources, and socio-economic and cultural aspects. The evaluations are performed with the help of software to measure and determine the stage or level of management of a conservation area. Supplementing this software is a manual and appendices that can be used by the team conducting the evaluation. The software automatically calculates the management stage of a conservation area. The criteria are explained towards the end of the following section (D2: Evaluation Method). It should be emphasized that the software can be used only when all the data and information collection steps as described in D2: Evaluation Method have been completed. This is because the final result – the management stage or level – obtained by using the software must be accompanied by recommendations to improve management performance. An explanation/description of each stage in the E-KKP3K technical guidelines is presented in pages 16 to 35 of this document.
12 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
12Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
13
1316
Des
crip
tion
of
each
leve
l/st
age
Le
vel
Stag
e
Red
1:
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
ea
Initi
ated
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
1:
Init
iati
ve
prop
osal
Prop
osal
to
initi
ate
esta
blis
hmen
t of
the
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea
subm
itted
by
(sel
ect
one)
L
ist
of p
ropo
sers
, if
mor
e th
an
one.
U
ser
mus
t at
tach
initi
ativ
e pr
opos
al d
ocum
ents
as
refe
rred
to
in A
rtic
le 9
cla
use
(2)
of t
he
Min
iste
r of
Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd
Fish
erie
s Reg
ulat
ion
Num
ber
PER.0
2/M
EN/2
009.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Use
r is
as
ked
to c
hoos
e on
e fr
om a
list
of
prop
oser
s.
Whe
re t
here
is m
ore
than
one
pro
pose
r, ju
st
sele
ct t
he m
ain
prop
oser
and
list
the
ot
her
prop
oser
s in
the
ve
rific
atio
n co
lum
n. I
n ca
ses
whe
re t
he a
rea
has
alre
ady
been
id
entif
ied/
res
erve
d, t
he
answ
er t
o th
is q
uest
ion
is t
aken
to
be ‘Y
es’.
M1
Indi
vidu
al
Com
mun
ity g
roup
Res
earc
h in
stitu
te
Educ
atio
nal i
nstit
ute
Gov
ernm
ent
orga
niza
tion
NG
O
17
Leve
l RED
: st
age
1 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
init
iate
d (c
onti
nued
)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
1:
Init
iati
ve
prop
osal
Prop
osal
to
initi
ate
esta
blis
hmen
t of
the
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea
is s
ubm
itted
to:
(se
lect
one
) D
ocum
ents
as
refe
rred
to
in
Artic
le 1
1 cl
ause
(2)
of
the
Min
iste
r of
Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd
Fish
erie
s Reg
ulat
ion
Num
ber
PER.0
2/M
EN/2
009.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Use
r se
lect
s ‘Y
es’ t
o an
swer
this
ques
tion
if th
e pr
opos
al is
as
refe
rred
to in
Artic
le 1
1 cla
uses
(1)
and
(2)
of t
he
Min
ister
of M
arin
e Af
fairs
an
d Fi
sher
ies
Regu
latio
n Num
ber 0
2/20
09. U
ser
mus
t sel
ect ‘
No’
for
ques
tion
M2b
. In
case
s w
here
the
area
has
al
read
y be
en id
entif
ied/
re
serv
ed, t
he a
nsw
er to
th
is qu
estio
n is
take
n to
be
‘Yes
’.
M2a
Nat
iona
l gov
ernm
ent
or lo
cal
gove
rnm
ent
with
out
prel
imin
ary
surv
ey a
nd m
ap.
M2b
N
atio
nal g
over
nmen
t or
loca
l go
vern
men
t w
ith p
relim
inar
y su
rvey
and
map
.
Doc
umen
ts a
s re
ferr
ed t
o in
Ar
ticle
10
of t
he M
inis
ter
of
Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd F
ishe
ries
Reg
ulat
ion
Num
ber
PER.0
2/M
EN/2
009.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Use
r se
lect
s ‘Y
es’ t
o an
swer
this
ques
tion
if th
e pr
opos
al is
as
refe
rred
to in
Artic
le 1
0 cla
uses
(1)
, (2)
and
(3)
of
the
Min
ister
of M
arin
e Af
fairs
and
Fish
erie
s Re
gula
tion
Num
ber
02/2
009.
Use
r mus
t sel
ect
‘No’
for qu
estio
n M
2a. I
n ca
ses
whe
re th
e ar
ea h
as
alre
ady
been
iden
tifie
d/
rese
rved
, the
ans
wer
to
this
ques
tion
is ta
ken
to b
e ‘Y
es’.
14 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
14Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
15
1518
Leve
l RED
: st
age
1 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
init
iate
d (c
onti
nued
)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
2. A
rea
iden
tifi
cati
on
and
inve
ntor
y
M3
Has
a s
urve
y an
d ev
alua
tion
of th
e pr
opos
ed a
rea
been
car
ried
out p
ursu
ant
to th
e M
inist
er o
f Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd
Fish
erie
s Re
gula
tions
Num
ber
PER.
02/M
EN/2
009
and/
or
PER.
17/M
EN/2
008?
Stud
y re
port
s pu
rsua
nt to
the
Min
ister
of
Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd F
isher
ies
Regu
latio
ns
Num
ber P
ER.0
2/M
EN/2
009
and/
or
PER.
17/M
EN/2
008.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
M4
Has
soc
ializ
atio
n of
the
prop
osed
are
a be
en c
arrie
d ou
t pur
suan
t to
the
Min
ister
of
Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd F
isher
ies
Regu
latio
ns N
umbe
r PER
.02/
MEN
/200
9 an
d/or
PER
.17/
MEN
/200
8?
Socia
lizat
ion
repo
rts
purs
uant
to th
e M
inist
er o
f Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd F
isher
ies
Regu
latio
ns N
umbe
r PER
.02/
MEN
/200
9 an
d/or
PER
.17/
MEN
/200
8.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
M5
Hav
e pu
blic c
onsu
ltatio
ns re
gard
ing
the
prop
osed
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea b
een
carr
ied
out p
ursu
ant t
o th
e M
inist
er o
f Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd F
isher
ies
Regu
latio
ns
Num
ber P
ER.0
2/M
EN/2
009
and/
or
PER.
17/M
EN/2
008?
Publ
ic co
nsul
tatio
n re
port
s pu
rsua
nt to
the
Min
ister
of M
arin
e Af
fairs
and
Fish
erie
s Re
gula
tions
Num
ber P
ER.0
2/M
EN/2
009
and/
or P
ER.1
7/M
EN/2
008.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
M6
Has
coo
rdin
atio
n w
ith rel
evan
t go
vern
men
t age
ncie
s re
gard
ing
the
prop
osed
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea b
een
carr
ied
out p
ursu
ant t
o th
e M
inist
er o
f Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd F
isher
ies
Regu
latio
ns
Num
ber P
ER.0
2/M
EN/2
009
and/
or
PER.
17/M
EN/2
008?
Coor
dina
tion
repo
rts
purs
uant
to th
e M
inist
er o
f Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd F
isher
ies
Regu
latio
ns N
umbe
r PER
.02/
MEN
/200
9 an
d/or
PER
.17/
MEN
/200
8.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
M7
Hav
e th
e re
sults
of i
dent
ifica
tion
and
inve
ntor
y be
en u
sed
to re
com
men
d th
e pr
opos
ed c
onse
rvat
ion
area
pur
suan
t to
the
Min
ister
of M
arin
e Af
fairs
and
Fi
sher
ies
Regu
latio
ns N
umbe
r PE
R.02
/MEN
/200
9 an
d/or
PE
R.17
/MEN
/200
8?
Reco
mm
enda
tion
for t
he p
ropo
sed
cons
erva
tion
area
pur
suan
t to
Artic
le 1
9 of
th
e M
inist
er o
f Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd F
isher
ies
Regu
latio
n Nu
mbe
r PER
.02/
MEN
/200
9 an
d/or
Art
icle
15
of R
egul
atio
n N
umbe
r PE
R.17
/MEN
/200
8.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
19
Leve
l RED
: st
age
1 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
init
iate
d (c
onti
nued
)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
3. R
eser
vati
on
of
con
serv
atio
n
area
M8a
H
as t
he a
rea
been
res
erve
d,
but
not
purs
uant
to
the
Min
iste
r of
Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd F
ishe
ries
Reg
ulat
ions
Num
ber
PER.0
2/M
EN/2
009
and/
or
PER.1
7/M
EN/2
008?
Dec
ree/
regu
latio
n, t
hat
will
nee
d to
be
revi
sed
acco
rdin
gly
(ref
er t
o Ar
ticle
20
clau
se (
2) o
f th
e M
inis
ter
of M
arin
e Af
fairs
and
Fi
sher
ies
Reg
ulat
ion
Num
ber
02/2
009)
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Are
as
are
gene
rally
res
erve
d by
dec
ree/
regu
latio
n.
M8b
H
as t
he a
rea
been
res
erve
d,
purs
uant
to
the
Min
iste
r of
M
arin
e Af
fairs
and
Fis
herie
s Reg
ulat
ions
Num
ber
PER.0
2/M
EN/2
009
and/
or
PER.1
7/M
EN/2
008?
Dec
ree/
regu
latio
n re
serv
ing
the
area
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y. A
reas
ar
e ge
nera
lly r
eser
ved
by d
ecre
e/re
gula
tion.
To
tal n
umbe
r of
‘Yes
’ ans
wer
s
Perc
enta
ge
16 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
16Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
17
1720
Leve
l St
age
Yel
low
2:
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
ea
Esta
blis
hed
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
4.
Man
agem
ent
orga
niza
tion
al
unit
an
d pe
rson
nel
K9
Are
ther
e co
nser
vatio
n ar
ea
man
agem
ent
pers
onne
l in
plac
e?
Org
aniz
atio
nal s
truc
ture
and
/or m
ain
task
s &
func
tions
doc
umen
t. Pe
ople
/indi
vidu
als
or a
n or
gani
zatio
n w
ith th
e fu
nctio
n an
d ta
sk o
f m
anag
ing
the
area
. For
ex
ampl
e: res
pons
ibilit
y fo
r m
anag
ing
the
cons
erva
tion
area
is a
par
t of
the
job
desc
riptio
n of
th
e Co
asts
and
Sm
all
Isla
nds
Mon
itorin
g Se
ctio
n.
K10
Doe
s th
e m
anag
emen
t un
it ha
ve
the
pers
onne
l app
oint
ed b
y de
cree
?
Dec
ree
of th
e lo
cal g
over
nmen
t he
ad/
min
iste
r/un
it he
ad.
Org
aniz
atio
nal s
truc
ture
and
/or
mai
n ta
sks
& fu
nctio
ns d
ocum
ent.
Peop
le/in
divi
dual
s or
or
gani
zatio
n ap
poin
ted
and
dete
rmin
ed b
y D
ecre
e.
K11
Is t
here
an
adeq
uate
num
ber
of
pers
onne
l in
the
man
agem
ent
unit
to r
un t
he o
rgan
izat
ion?
Org
aniz
atio
nal
stru
ctur
e an
d/or
m
ain
task
s &
func
tions
doc
umen
t M
anag
ers
job
desc
riptio
ns.
An a
dequ
ate
num
ber o
f pe
rson
nel t
o ex
ecut
e th
e m
ain
task
s &
func
tions
of
the
orga
niza
tion
as p
er
gove
rnm
ent m
inim
um
stan
dard
. K1
2 H
ave
the
man
ager
s ha
d ba
sic
cons
erva
tion
trai
ning
?
Tr
aini
ng re
port
s or
cer
tific
ates
or
othe
r pr
oof.
Take
n pa
rt in
at l
east
one
trai
ning
cou
rse
appr
opria
te
to m
ain
task
s &
func
tions
, su
ch a
s M
PA 1
01, f
ish
reso
urce
s co
nser
vatio
n trai
ning
, div
ing
and
mon
itorin
g tr
aini
ng, e
tc. 21
Le
vel Y
ELLO
W:
stag
e 2 –
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea e
stab
lishe
d (c
onti
nued
)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
5.
Man
agem
ent
and
zon
ing
plan
s
K13
Wha
t is
the
sta
tus
of t
he m
anag
emen
t pl
an?
No
man
agem
ent
plan
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
If th
e an
swer
is ‘Y
es’,
do n
ot
com
plet
e th
e ta
ble
for
crite
ria 5
(m
anag
emen
t and
zo
ning
pla
ns).
M
anag
emen
t pl
an b
eing
dra
fted
.
D
raft
man
agem
ent
plan
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y. If
the
answ
er is
‘Yes
’, an
swer
‘No’
fo
r the
oth
er q
uest
ions
in K
13.
Man
agem
ent
plan
fin
aliz
ed.
Fin
aliz
ed m
anag
emen
t pl
an.
Doc
umen
t si
gned
by
the
head
of
the
man
agem
ent
unit.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
If th
e an
swer
is ‘Y
es’,
answ
er ‘N
o’
for t
he o
ther
que
stio
ns in
K1
3. T
he m
anag
emen
t do
cum
ent h
as b
een
final
ized
and
subm
itted
for
appr
oval
. The
dra
fting
ph
ases
of t
he m
anag
emen
t do
cum
ent a
re p
er A
rticl
e 30
of
Reg
ulat
ion
of th
e M
inist
er
of M
arin
e Af
fairs
and
Fi
sher
ies
30/2
010.
5
. M
anag
emen
t an
d zo
nin
g pl
ans
K14
Doe
s th
e m
anag
emen
t pla
n co
ntai
n re
sour
ces
and
soci
o-ec
onom
ic a
nd
cultu
ral i
nfor
mat
ion
that
can
be
used
as
bas
elin
e da
ta (
t 0)?
M
anag
emen
t pl
an:
man
agem
ent
plan
mat
rix/
sum
mar
y,
cont
aini
ng in
form
atio
n ab
out
reso
urce
s –
base
line
data
.
O
ther
sup
port
ing
docu
men
ts.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
In
form
atio
n ab
out
reso
urce
s an
d so
cio-
econ
omic
and
cultu
ral
cond
ition
s in
eac
h co
nser
vatio
n ar
ea, s
uch
as
cora
l ree
f cov
erag
e, ta
rget
fis
h ab
unda
nce,
loca
l co
mm
unity
per
cept
ions
, fis
hers
’ inc
omes
, etc
.
18 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
18Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
19
1922
Leve
l YEL
LOW
: st
age
2 –
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea e
stab
lishe
d (c
onti
nued
)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
6. F
acili
ties
an
d in
fras
truc
ture
to
sup
port
m
anag
emen
t
K15
Doe
s th
e m
anag
emen
t un
it ha
ve
offic
es?
Rep
orts
and
phy
sica
l che
cks.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
K16
Doe
s th
e m
anag
emen
t un
it ha
ve
an in
form
atio
n bo
ard?
Rep
orts
and
phy
sica
l che
cks.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y. A
n in
form
atio
n bo
ard
that
ex
plai
ns a
t a
min
imum
the
bo
unda
ries
of t
he
cons
erva
tion
area
, and
its
zoni
ng s
yste
m a
nd w
hat
activ
ities
are
pe
rmitt
ed/n
ot p
erm
itted
in
the
cons
erva
tion
area
. K1
7 D
oes
the
man
agem
ent
unit
have
m
inim
um o
ffic
e eq
uipm
ent?
Rep
orts
and
phy
sica
l che
cks.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y. T
he
min
imum
of
equi
pmen
t th
at e
nabl
es t
he
orga
niza
tion
to f
unct
ion,
su
ch a
s fu
rnitu
re, d
ata
proc
essi
ng t
ools
, co
mm
unic
atio
n to
ols.
K1
8 D
oes
the
man
agem
ent
unit
have
m
anag
emen
t fa
cilit
ies
(mon
itorin
g to
ols,
co
mm
unic
atio
n to
ols)
?
Rep
orts
and
phy
sica
l che
cks.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
23
Leve
l YEL
LOW
: st
age
2 –
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea e
stab
lishe
d (c
onti
nued
)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
7.
Man
agem
ent
fund
ing
supp
ort
K19
Wha
t is
the
sta
tus
of m
anag
emen
t fu
ndin
g su
ppor
t?
No
man
agem
ent
fund
ing
supp
ort.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
If
the
answ
er t
o th
is q
uest
ion
is ‘Y
es’,
the
answ
er t
o th
e ot
her
ques
tion
in
K19
is ‘N
o’.
Man
agem
ent
fund
ing
supp
ort,
bu
t no
t re
liant
(en
ough
to
oper
ate
offic
e).
Man
agem
ent
unit
finan
cial
re
port
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
If
the
answ
er t
o th
is q
uest
ion
is ‘Y
es’,
the
answ
er t
o th
e ot
her
ques
tion
in
K19
is ‘N
o’.
Tota
l num
ber
of ‘Y
es’ a
nsw
ers
Pe
rcen
tage
20 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
20Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
21
2124
Leve
l St
age
Gre
en
3: C
onse
rvat
ion
Area
Man
aged
Min
imal
ly
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
4.
Man
agem
ent
orga
niz
atio
nal
un
it a
nd
pers
onne
l
H20
Ar
e th
ere
suffi
cien
t per
sonn
el in
th
e m
anag
emen
t uni
t to
exec
ute
the
man
agem
ent f
unct
ions
(s
urve
illan
ce, r
esou
rce
mon
itorin
g, s
ocio
-eco
nom
ic &
cu
ltura
l mon
itorin
g)?
Doc
umen
ts a
nd/o
r re
port
s re
late
d to
the
man
agem
ent
pers
onne
l fun
ctio
ns.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
H21
D
o pe
rson
nel i
n th
e m
anag
emen
t un
it ha
ve q
ualif
icat
ions
in a
t le
ast t
wo
of th
e fo
llow
ing
requ
ired
man
agem
ent c
ompe
tenc
ies
(pla
nnin
g, m
onito
ring
&
eval
uatio
n, s
urve
illan
ce, r
esea
rch,
re
sour
ce a
nd s
ocio
-eco
nom
ic a
nd
cultu
ral m
onito
ring)
?
Cert
ifica
tes
of c
ompe
tenc
y.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
H22
H
as t
he m
anag
emen
t un
it in
itiat
ed p
artn
ersh
ips
with
st
akeh
olde
rs?
Stak
ehol
der
com
mun
icat
ion
repo
rts.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
5. F
acili
ties
an
d in
fras
truc
ture
to
sup
port
m
anag
emen
t
H23
D
oes
the
man
agem
ent
unit
offic
e ha
ve a
dequ
ate
offic
e eq
uipm
ent?
Rep
orts
and
phy
sica
l che
cks.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
H24
D
oes
the
man
agem
ent
unit
have
m
anag
emen
t su
ppor
ting
faci
litie
s an
d in
fras
truc
ture
?
Rep
orts
(on
sur
veill
ance
eq
uipm
ent, r
esou
rce
mon
itorin
g eq
uipm
ent, c
omm
unic
atio
n/
soci
aliz
atio
n to
ols
and
othe
r fa
cilit
ies,
bou
ndar
y m
arke
rs)
and
phys
ical
che
cks.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
25
Leve
l GR
EEN
: st
age
3 –
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea m
anag
ed m
inim
ally
(co
ntin
ued)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
6.
Man
agem
ent
fund
ing
supp
ort
H25
H
as a
man
agem
ent
fund
ing
plan
be
en p
repa
red?
St
rate
gy d
ocum
ents
and
fun
ding
pl
ans.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
H26
H
as t
he m
anag
emen
t uni
t se
cure
d m
anag
emen
t fu
ndin
g su
ppor
t fr
om t
he lo
cal
gove
rnm
ent b
udge
t / c
entr
al
gove
rnm
ent
budg
et?
Man
agem
ent
unit
finan
ce r
epor
ts
that
mee
t st
anda
rds
appl
icab
le in
In
done
sia
& a
nnua
l wor
k pl
an.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
H27
H
ave
plan
s be
en m
ade
to s
ecur
e fu
ndin
g fo
r m
anag
emen
t of
the
co
nser
vatio
n ar
ea?
Alte
rnat
ive
budg
et p
ropo
sal
docu
men
ts, l
ette
rs o
f ap
plic
atio
n,
prop
osal
s an
d ot
her
docu
men
tatio
n.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
8. A
ppro
val o
f m
anag
emen
t an
d zo
nin
g pl
ans
H28
H
as t
he fi
naliz
ed m
anag
emen
t pl
an b
een
subm
itted
for
appr
oval
?
Prop
osal
doc
umen
ts a
nd p
ropo
sal
rece
ipt.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
H29
H
as t
he m
anag
emen
t pla
n be
en
appr
oved
?
D
ecre
e ap
prov
ing
the
man
agem
ent
plan
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
9.
Man
agem
ent
stan
dard
op
erat
ing
proc
edur
es
(SO
Ps)
H30
Ar
e th
ere
SOPs
for
offic
e ad
min
istr
atio
n an
d fin
anci
al
man
agem
ent?
SOP
docu
men
ts. P
leas
e st
ate.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
H31
Ar
e th
ere
SOPs
for
faci
litie
s an
d in
fras
truc
ture
(m
inim
um
stan
dard
s)?
SOP
docu
men
ts o
n fa
cilit
ies
and
infr
astr
uctu
re
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
H32
Ar
e th
ere
man
agem
ent
SOPs
(fo
r in
stitu
tiona
l str
engt
heni
ng, j
oint
pa
trol
s, r
esou
rce
man
agem
ent,
an
d so
cio-
econ
omic
& c
ultu
ral
stre
ngth
enin
g) th
at m
eet
the
min
imum
sta
ndar
ds?
SOP
docu
men
ts. P
leas
e st
ate.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
22 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
22Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
23
2326
Leve
l GR
EEN
: st
age
3 –
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea m
anag
ed m
inim
ally
(co
ntin
ued)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
10
. Im
plem
enta
tio
n of
m
anag
emen
t an
d zo
nin
g pl
ans
H33
H
as t
he in
stitu
tiona
l st
reng
then
ing
stra
tegy
bee
n im
plem
ente
d?
Activ
ity m
onito
ring
& e
valu
atio
n re
port
s.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
H34
H
as a
bas
elin
e su
rvey
of
reso
urce
s be
en c
ondu
cted
?
M
anag
emen
t pl
an a
nd/o
r su
rvey
re
port
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
H35
H
as t
he r
esou
rce
man
agem
ent
stre
ngth
enin
g st
rate
gy b
een
impl
emen
ted?
Activ
ity m
onito
ring
& e
valu
atio
n re
port
s.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
H36
H
as a
soc
io-e
cono
mic
and
cu
ltura
l bas
elin
e su
rvey
bee
n co
nduc
ted?
Man
agem
ent
plan
and
/or
surv
ey
repo
rts.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
H37
H
as a
soc
io-e
cono
mic
and
cu
ltura
l str
engt
heni
ng s
trat
egy
been
impl
emen
ted?
Activ
ity m
onito
ring
& e
valu
atio
n re
port
s.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
H38
Ar
e th
ere
initi
ativ
es t
o m
ake
use
of t
he a
rea
(at
leas
t on
e?)
Activ
ity m
onito
ring
& e
valu
atio
n re
port
s.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
11
. D
esig
nati
on o
f A
quat
ic
Con
serv
atio
n
Are
a
H39
H
as t
he p
ropo
sal f
or
desi
gnat
ion
been
sub
mitt
ed t
o th
e M
inis
ter
for
Mar
ine
Affa
irs
and
Fish
erie
s?
Prop
osal
doc
umen
ts a
nd r
ecei
pt
of s
ubm
issi
on o
f do
cum
ents
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
H40
H
as t
he c
onse
rvat
ion
area
bee
n de
sign
ated
by
the
Min
iste
r of
M
arin
e Af
fairs
and
Fis
herie
s?
Dec
ree
of t
he M
inis
ter.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
Tota
l num
ber
of ‘Y
es’ a
nsw
ers
Perc
enta
ge
27
Leve
l St
age
Blu
e 4:
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
ea M
anag
ed O
ptim
ally
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
4.
Man
agem
ent
orga
niz
atio
nal
un
it a
nd
pers
onne
l
B41
Do
pers
onne
l in
the
man
agem
ent
unit
have
qu
alifi
catio
ns in
the
req
uire
d m
anag
emen
t co
mpe
tenc
ies?
Doc
umen
ts a
nd/o
r re
port
s re
leva
nt to
man
agem
ent
pers
onne
l cap
acity
(pl
anni
ng,
mon
itorin
g &
eva
luat
ion,
su
rvei
llanc
e, r
esea
rch,
res
ourc
es
and
soci
o-ec
onom
ic a
nd c
ultu
ral
mon
itorin
g). T
rain
ing
cert
ifica
tes
and/
or d
iplo
mas
as
proo
f of
qual
ifica
tions
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory
5. F
acili
ties
an
d in
fras
truc
ture
to
sup
port
m
anag
emen
t
B42
Are
the
requ
ired
faci
litie
s an
d in
fras
truc
ture
in p
lace
?
Re
port
s an
d ph
ysic
al c
heck
s.
Self-
expl
anat
ory
6.
Man
agem
ent
fund
ing
supp
ort
B43
Is m
anag
emen
t fu
ndin
g su
ppor
t av
aila
ble
as p
lann
ed?
Activ
ity im
plem
enta
tion
and
fund
ing
sour
ce r
epor
ts.
Res
pons
e to
thi
s qu
estio
n re
fers
to
the
budg
et
requ
irem
ent
per
ques
tion
H27
. 9
. M
anag
emen
t st
anda
rd
oper
atin
g pr
oced
ures
(S
OP
s)
B44
Are
ther
e tr
aini
ng a
nd
educ
atio
n SO
Ps in
pla
ce?
Trai
ning
and
edu
catio
n SO
P do
cum
ents
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
B45
Are
the
SOPs
on
aqua
tic
tour
ism
act
iviti
es in
pla
ce?
Eco-
tour
ism
SO
P do
cum
ents
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B46
Are
ther
e SO
Ps o
n aq
uacu
lture
in
pla
ce?
Aqua
cultu
re S
OP
docu
men
ts.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
B47
Are
ther
e SO
Ps o
n fis
hing
in
plac
e?
Fish
ing
SOP
docu
men
ts.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
24 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
24Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
25
2528
Leve
l BLU
E: s
tage
4 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
man
aged
opt
imal
ly (
cont
inue
d)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
11
. D
esig
nati
on o
f A
quat
ic
Con
serv
atio
n
Are
a
B48
Has
des
igna
tion
of t
he
cons
erva
tion
area
bee
n pu
blic
ized
?
Rep
orts
of
soci
aliz
atio
n ac
tiviti
es,
incl
udin
g at
tend
ance
list
s an
d ph
otog
raph
s of
act
iviti
es.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
12
. Bou
ndar
y m
arki
ng
B49
Wha
t is
the
sta
tus
of t
he b
ound
ary
mar
king
? -
Boun
dary
mar
king
initi
ated
.
Dec
ree
of b
ound
ary
mar
king
co
mm
ittee
as
per
Artic
le 2
4 of
the
M
inis
ter
of M
arin
e Af
fairs
and
Fi
sher
ies
Regu
latio
n N
umbe
r PE
R.0
2/M
EN/2
009.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
- Bou
ndar
y m
arki
ng in
pro
gres
s.
Activ
ity r
epor
ts (
mea
surin
g, m
appi
ng
and
soci
aliz
atio
n).
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
- Bo
unda
ry m
arki
ng a
ppro
ved.
N
otifi
catio
n of
bou
ndar
y m
arki
ng
esta
blis
hed
by D
ecre
e of
the
Min
iste
r of
Mar
ine
Affa
irs &
Fis
herie
s.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
13
. In
stit
uti
onal
izat
ion
B50
Hav
e pa
rtne
rshi
ps w
ith
stak
ehol
ders
bee
n ag
reed
?
Ac
tivity
coo
rdin
atio
n re
ports
, agr
eem
ents
, jo
int p
rogr
ams,
and
sim
ilar.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B51
Hav
e pa
rtne
rshi
ps w
ith s
take
hold
ers
been
impl
emen
ted?
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y. U
sers
sh
ould
cho
ose
one
of
the
optio
ns p
rovi
ded.
N
o
Yes
, but
inci
dent
al.
Ac
tivity
rep
orts
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Pa
rtne
rshi
ps a
re
tem
pora
ry o
r in
cide
ntal
. Y
es, s
usta
inab
le
part
ners
hips
.
Ac
tivity
rep
orts
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Pa
rtner
ship
s im
plem
ente
d as
pla
nned
.
29
Leve
l BLU
E: s
tage
4 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
man
aged
opt
imal
ly (
cont
inue
d)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
13
. In
stit
uti
onal
izat
ion
B52
Has
str
engt
heni
ng o
f lo
cal
inst
itutio
ns b
een
impl
emen
ted?
Activ
ity
repo
rts,
te
chni
cal
assi
stan
ce,
guid
ance
, tr
aini
ng,
exte
nsio
n.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B53
Wha
t is
the
sta
tus
of
enfo
rcem
ent
of r
ules
(m
onito
ring
& s
urve
illan
ce)
in
the
cons
erva
tion
area
by
the
man
agem
ent
unit?
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
Use
rs s
houl
d se
lect
on
e of
the
opt
ions
pr
ovid
ed.
Rul
es a
re n
ot e
nfor
ced.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Rul
es a
re c
onsi
sten
tly
enfo
rced
.
Reg
ulat
ion
soci
aliz
atio
n re
port
s;
info
rmat
ion
boar
ds;
surv
eilla
nce
repo
rts.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B54
Wha
t is
the
sta
tus
of
com
mun
ity b
ased
sur
veill
ance
in
the
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea?
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
Use
rs s
houl
d se
lect
on
e of
the
opt
ions
pr
ovid
ed.
N
ot d
one.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Initi
ated
and
in p
rogr
ess
(org
aniz
atio
n &
sys
tem
).
Doc
umen
ts (
repo
rts
of a
ctiv
ities
an
d fo
rmat
ion
of c
omm
unity
su
rvei
llanc
e gr
oup)
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Reg
ular
sur
veill
ance
car
ried
out.
D
ocum
ents
(re
port
s of
com
mun
ity
surv
eilla
nce
activ
ities
).
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
26 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
26Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
27
2730
Leve
l BLU
E: s
tage
4 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
man
aged
opt
imal
ly (
cont
inue
d)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
13
. In
stit
uti
onal
izat
ion
B55
Is t
he c
onse
rvat
ion
area
m
entio
ned
in t
he N
atio
nal
Med
ium
-Ter
m D
evel
opm
ent
Plan
/ N
atio
nal G
over
nmen
t St
rate
gic
Plan
and
/or
the
Loca
l M
ediu
m-T
erm
Dev
elop
men
t Pl
an /
Loc
al G
over
nmen
t St
rate
gic
Plan
?
Nat
iona
l Med
ium
-Ter
m
Plan
/Nat
iona
l Gov
ernm
ent
Stra
tegi
c Pl
an;
Loca
l Med
ium
-Ter
m
Dev
elop
men
t Pl
an /
Loc
al
Gov
ernm
ent
Stra
tegi
c Pl
an
docu
men
ts.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B56
Is t
he c
onse
rvat
ion
area
m
entio
ned
in t
he A
rea
Zoni
ng
Plan
/ C
oast
s an
d Sm
all
Isla
nds
Area
Zon
ing
Plan
?
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
Use
rs s
houl
d se
lect
on
e of
the
opt
ions
pr
ovid
ed.
N
o
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
In t
he p
roce
ss o
f be
ing
brou
ght
into
line
with
the
no
men
clat
ure
of c
urre
nt
regu
latio
ns
Activ
ity d
ocum
ents
/rep
orts
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
In
the
pro
cess
of
bein
g de
sign
ated
by
loca
l re
gula
tion
Activ
ity d
ocum
ents
/rep
orts
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Ye
s, th
e co
nser
vatio
n ar
ea is
m
entio
ned
in th
e Ar
ea Z
onin
g Pl
an /
Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Is
land
s Ar
ea Z
onin
g Pl
an
Area
Zon
ing
Plan
/ C
oast
s an
d Sm
all I
slan
ds A
rea
Zoni
ng P
lan
docu
men
ts.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
31
Leve
l BLU
E: s
tage
4 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
man
aged
opt
imal
ly (
cont
inue
d)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
14
. Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t
B57
Wha
t is
the
con
ditio
n of
fis
h re
sour
ce h
abita
ts in
the
co
nser
vatio
n ar
ea?
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
B57A
H
as t
here
bee
n im
prov
emen
t to
th
e co
nditi
on o
f ha
bita
ts in
the
co
re z
one,
sus
tain
able
fis
hing
zo
ne, u
se z
one,
res
tric
ted
use
zone
, and
/or
othe
r zo
nes,
as
indi
cate
d fo
r ex
ampl
e by
an
incr
ease
in t
he c
over
age
of
cora
l ree
f ec
osys
tem
s an
d/or
se
agra
ss m
eado
w a
nd/o
r m
angr
ove
fore
st?
Base
line
cond
ition
(t 0
) in
eac
h zo
ne c
ompa
red
with
the
res
ults
of
mon
itorin
g of
fish
res
ourc
e ha
bita
ts in
the
se z
ones
(sh
ould
re
fer
to t
empo
ral p
rogr
essi
on
data
).
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B57B
H
as t
here
bee
n im
prov
emen
t to
th
e co
nditi
on o
f ha
bita
ts in
the
co
re z
one,
sus
tain
able
fis
herie
s zo
ne, u
se z
one,
res
tric
ted
use
zone
, and
/or
othe
r zo
nes,
as
indi
cate
d fo
r ex
ampl
e by
an
incr
ease
in t
he a
rea
of c
oral
re
ef e
cosy
stem
s an
d/or
se
agra
ss m
eado
w a
nd/o
r m
angr
ove
fore
st?
Base
line
cond
ition
(t 0
) in
eac
h zo
ne c
ompa
red
with
the
res
ults
of
mon
itorin
g of
fish
res
ourc
e ha
bita
ts in
the
se z
ones
(sh
ould
re
fer
to t
empo
ral p
rogr
essi
on
data
).
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B57C
H
as t
he p
hysi
cal-c
hem
ical
-ge
olog
ical
qua
lity
of t
he w
ater
s in
the
cor
e zo
ne, s
usta
inab
le
fishe
ries
zone
, use
zon
e,
rest
ricte
d us
e zo
ne, a
nd/o
r ot
her
zone
s be
en m
aint
aine
d/
pres
erve
d?
Base
line
cond
ition
(t 0
) in
eac
h zo
ne c
ompa
red
with
the
res
ults
of
mon
itorin
g of
fish
res
ourc
e ha
bita
ts in
the
se z
ones
(sh
ould
re
fer
to t
empo
ral p
rogr
essi
on
data
).
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
28 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
28Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
29
2932
Leve
l BLU
E: s
tage
4 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
man
aged
opt
imal
ly (
cont
inue
d)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
4. R
esou
rce
Man
agem
ent
B58
Wha
t is
the
con
ditio
n of
fis
h po
pula
tions
or
non-
fish
targ
et
spec
ies
popu
latio
ns in
the
co
nser
vatio
n ar
ea?
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y. U
sers
sh
ould
sel
ect o
ne fr
om th
e op
tions
B58
A to
B58
F th
at
is m
ost r
elev
ant t
o th
e sit
uatio
n an
d ty
pe o
f are
a.
B58A
H
ave
fish
popu
latio
ns b
een
mai
ntai
ned
or in
crea
sed
in t
he
core
zon
e, s
usta
inab
le f
ishe
ries
zone
, and
use
zon
e?
Fish
pop
ulat
ion
mon
itorin
g re
port
s fo
r co
nser
vatio
n ta
rget
s (in
clud
ing
biom
ass,
num
ber
of fis
h sp
ecie
s,
abun
danc
e, d
iver
sity
).
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B58B
Ha
s th
e qu
ality
(len
gth
and
wei
ght)
of
dom
inan
t fish
spe
cies
in th
e co
re z
one,
su
stai
nabl
e fis
herie
s zo
ne, u
se z
one
and/
or re
stric
ted
use
zone
(cap
ture
fis
herie
s) b
een
mai
ntai
ned
or
impr
oved
?
Qua
lity
(leng
th/w
eigh
t) m
onito
ring
repo
rts
of f
ish
in the
se z
ones
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
B58C
H
as t
he v
olum
e of
fis
hers
’ cat
ches
in
the
sus
tain
able
fis
herie
s zo
ne/r
estr
icte
d us
e zo
ne b
een
mai
ntai
ned
or im
prov
ed?
Mon
itorin
g re
port
s on
the
vol
ume
of
fishe
rs’ c
atch
es (
tota
l bio
mas
s pe
r nu
mbe
r of
fis
hers
per
uni
t/tim
e pe
riod)
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B58D
Ha
ve fi
sher
pro
duct
ion
volu
mes
in th
e su
stai
nabl
e fis
herie
s zo
ne/r
estri
cted
us
e zo
ne (a
quac
ultu
re) b
een
mai
ntai
ned
or im
prov
ed?
Mon
itorin
g re
port
s on
aqu
acul
ture
pr
oduc
tion
volu
mes
(bi
omas
s pe
r nu
mbe
r of
fis
hers
per
uni
t/tim
e pe
riod)
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B58E
H
ave
the
num
ber
and
dive
rsity
of
non-
fish
targ
et s
peci
es in
the
cor
e zo
ne, s
usta
inab
le u
se z
one
and/
or
rest
ricte
d us
e zo
ne b
een
mai
ntai
ned
or in
crea
sed?
Mon
itorin
g re
port
s on
num
ber
and
dive
rsity
of no
n-fis
h ta
rget
spe
cies
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
B58F
Ha
ve p
opul
atio
ns o
f end
emic
spec
ies
been
mai
ntai
ned
or in
crea
sed?
M
onito
ring
repo
rts
on e
ndem
ic
spec
ies
popu
latio
ns.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
33
Leve
l BLU
E: s
tage
4 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
man
aged
opt
imal
ly (
cont
inue
d)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
14
. Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t
B59
Has
res
earc
h an
d de
velo
pmen
t re
leva
nt t
o th
e ar
ea b
een
carr
ied
out
to s
uppo
rt
man
agem
ent
activ
ities
?
Publ
ishe
d re
sear
ch &
dev
elop
men
t do
cum
ents
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
B60
Is u
se o
f th
e ar
ea’s
res
ourc
es
orga
nize
d, w
ithou
t ha
ving
a
nega
tive
impa
ct o
n ha
bita
ts/
popu
latio
ns in
the
are
a?
Anal
ysis
of
reso
urce
use
rep
orts
an
d ha
bita
t/po
pula
tion
mon
itorin
g re
port
s.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
15
. Soc
io-
econ
omic
&
cult
ura
l m
anag
emen
t
B61
Doe
s m
anag
emen
t of
the
co
nser
vatio
n ar
ea
acco
mm
odat
e lo
cal t
radi
tiona
l an
d cu
ltura
l con
ditio
ns a
nd/o
r lo
cal k
now
ledg
e?
Rep
orts
of
inte
rvie
ws
with
in
dige
nous
peo
ples
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
B62
Has
the
leve
l of
com
mun
ity
supp
ort
for
man
agem
ent
of
the
cons
erva
tion
area
in
crea
sed?
Rep
ort
of m
onito
ring
of lo
cal
com
mun
ity p
erce
ptio
ns (
whi
ch
indi
cate
incr
ease
d co
mm
unity
aw
aren
ess
of a
nd a
ctio
n th
at
supp
orts
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea
man
agem
ent)
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B63
Has
com
mun
ity p
artic
ipat
ion
in
man
agem
ent
of t
he
cons
erva
tion
area
incr
ease
d?
Rep
ort
of c
onse
rvat
ion
area
m
anag
emen
t ac
tiviti
es (
that
in
dica
te c
omm
unity
rep
rese
ntat
ion
and
part
icip
atio
n in
all
man
agem
ent
proc
esse
s, o
r co
mm
unity
par
ticip
atio
n in
im
plem
entin
g pr
ogra
ms
that
are
re
leva
nt t
o th
e co
mm
unity
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
30 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
30Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
31
3134
Leve
l BLU
E: s
tage
4 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
man
aged
opt
imal
ly (
cont
inue
d)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
15
. Soc
io-
econ
omic
&
cult
ura
l m
anag
emen
t
B64
Has
the
inci
denc
e of
bre
ache
s in
the
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea
decr
ease
d?
Patro
l rep
orts
con
tain
ing
data
abo
ut
illega
l and
env
ironm
enta
l unf
riend
ly
activ
ities
, and
the
num
ber o
f hab
itats
da
mag
ed in
the
cons
erva
tion
area
(ti
me
serie
s re
ports
), co
mm
unity
pa
trol r
epor
ts.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B65
Do
stak
ehol
ders
use
the
co
nser
vatio
n ar
ea a
s a
plac
e fo
r tr
aini
ng a
nd e
duca
tion?
Rep
orts
on
trai
ning
and
edu
catio
n in
the
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B66
Do
tour
ism
act
iviti
es in
the
co
nser
vatio
n ar
ea p
rovi
de
soci
o-ec
onom
ic b
enef
its t
o st
akeh
olde
rs, p
artic
ular
ly t
he
loca
l com
mun
ity?
Impa
ct a
naly
sis
of t
ouris
m
activ
ities
in t
he c
onse
rvat
ion
area
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
B67
Do
aqua
cultu
re a
ctiv
ities
in t
he
cons
erva
tion
area
pro
vide
so
cio-
econ
omic
ben
efits
to
stak
ehol
ders
, par
ticul
arly
the
lo
cal c
omm
unity
?
Impa
ct a
naly
sis
of a
quac
ultu
re
activ
ities
in t
he c
onse
rvat
ion
area
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
B68
Do c
aptu
re fi
sher
ies
activ
ities
in
the
cons
erva
tion
area
pro
vide
so
cio-e
cono
mic
bene
fits
to
stak
ehol
ders
, par
ticul
arly
the
loca
l co
mm
unity
?
Impa
ct a
naly
sis
of c
aptu
re
fishe
ries
in t
he c
onse
rvat
ion
area
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
Tota
l num
ber
of ‘Y
es’ a
nsw
ers
Perc
enta
ge
35
Leve
l St
age
Gol
d 5:
Sel
f Su
stai
ning
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
ea
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
13
. In
stit
uti
onal
izat
ion
E69
Are
part
ners
hips
with
st
akeh
olde
rs p
rogr
essi
ng w
ell
and
havi
ng a
pos
itive
impa
ct?
Activ
ity a
nd m
onito
ring
repo
rts,
and
in
depe
nden
t st
udy
repo
rts
that
in
dica
te a
pos
itive
impa
ct f
rom
pa
rtne
rshi
ps.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
16
. Im
prov
ing
co
mm
unit
y w
elfa
re
E70
Is m
anag
emen
t ha
ving
a
posi
tive
impa
ct o
n m
anag
emen
t pe
rfor
man
ce?
Inde
pend
ent
stud
y re
port
s th
at
indi
cate
man
agem
ent
activ
ities
hav
e a
posi
tive
impa
ct o
n th
e ar
ea’s
re
sour
ces,
and
on
soci
al a
nd
econ
omic
asp
ects
(in
clud
ing
man
agem
ent
orga
niza
tion)
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
E71
Hav
e in
com
es (
purc
hasi
ng
pow
er)
incr
ease
d as
an
impa
ct
of m
anag
emen
t?
Surv
eilla
nce
repo
rts/
inde
pend
ent
eval
uatio
ns, s
tatis
tics
agen
cy d
ata.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
E72
Has
eco
nom
ic a
ctiv
ity in
cor
e se
ctor
s in
the
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea
(fis
herie
s/to
uris
m)
incr
ease
d?
Surv
eilla
nce
repo
rts/
inde
pend
ent
eval
uatio
ns, s
tatis
tics
agen
cy d
ata.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
E73
Hav
e in
crea
sed
loca
l inc
omes
ra
ised
pub
lic a
war
enes
s of
the
ne
ed t
o su
ppor
t co
nser
vatio
n of
th
e ar
ea’s r
esou
rces
?
Surv
eilla
nce
repo
rts/
inde
pend
ent
eval
uatio
ns.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
17
. Su
stai
nabl
e fu
ndin
g
E74
Hav
e ac
tiviti
es c
arrie
d ou
t bee
n a
part
of a
sus
tain
able
fund
ing
syst
em
that
eng
ages
sta
keho
lder
s?
Activ
ity r
epor
ts a
nd f
inan
cial
re
port
s.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Tota
l num
ber
of ‘Y
es’ a
nsw
ers
Perc
enta
ge
32 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
32Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
33
33
36
D2: Evaluation Method
The steps involved in evaluating management effectiveness are summarized in Figure 2 below.
Figure 2 – Steps in evaluating management effectiveness The first step is to form the team that will perform the evaluation. In general, the composition of the team depends on the aim of the evaluation activity itself; whether it is for evaluation purposes or for planning activities to improve management performance. For evaluation purposes, it is strongly recommended that 50% of the team is made up of people other than management, in particular representatives of the direct stakeholders such as representatives of fishers, tourism businesses, other community members, and the other 50% from the conservation management team, in particular the unit head and planners. For planning purposes, all the team members could come from the local area, but involving stakeholders such as local Marine Affairs & Fisheries agency, the Directorate for Conservation of Area and Fish Species, and other relevant institutions such as the National Aquatic Conservation Area Office and the Coasts and Marine Resources Management Office, is strongly recommended. The next step is to gather the necessary background and baseline data to assist the next step, which is completing the evaluation score card. Please note that what is meant by baseline data here includes, but is not limited to, decrees, minutes of meetings or workshops, and activity reports. In other words, anything that can be used as a tool to verify ‘Yes’ answers, if agreed, can be used as baseline data.
Form evaluation team
Collect background and baseline data
Complete evaluation score card
Make a list of recommendations
Prioritize recommendations
37
It is strongly recommended that the score cards are completed through focus group discussions that are guided by a facilitator who plays a neutral role. The focus group discussions should be limited to a maximum of 10 participants. As well as to obtain the consensus of the evaluation team members, the focus group discussions should also act as a control of the responses given. As the score cards presented above show, and as presented in the appendix, as far as possible, positive ‘Yes’ responses should be backed by concrete proof that verifies the answer. Because only by giving as honest answers as possible can a list of recommended activities for the subsequent stage be made. Preparation of the list of recommended activities should be based on all the ‘No’ answers generated at each level. Prioritizing of the recommended activities should be based on availability of funding and resources. It is strongly recommended that the priority scales commonly used by government agencies be used here. How to answer the questions
There are two possible answers to the questions on the score card: ‘Yes’ and ‘No’. It should be added here that ‘Yes’ answers should be given for activities or matters related to the question that have been done or completed. Therefore, if an activity is still in progress, or, for example, has been done but no report has been produced yet, the answer is ‘No’. However, there are some more specific questions related to activities that could be answered ‘Yes’ (for example, question K13). How to measure achievement at each stage To determine achievement at each stage, the following simple formula is used:
Achievement (percent) =
Number of ‘Yes’ answers Number of questions at the level being
evaluated* x100%
*Red = 8; Yellow = 11; Green = 21; Blue = 28; Gold = 6 Example: If at level Red, the answer to 5 questions is ‘Yes’, achievement at this level is (5/8 x 100)% = 62.4% If at level Green, the answer to 10 questions is ‘Yes’, achievement at this level is (10/19 x 100)% = 52.6% If at level Blue, the answer to 15 questions is ‘Yes’, achievement at this level is (15/27 x 100)% = 55.6% How to determine the level of a conservation area To determine the level of the conservation area evaluated, the following simple rules are applied. If a conservation area achieves a perfect score of 100% for a particular level, then it is at that level. This simple rule applies because this evaluation is based
34 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
34Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
35
35
38
on the principle of building blocks, whereby the next level cannot be attained if all the activities at the previous level have not be done or completed. Following are some practical examples. It is should be emphasized here that the software used determines the level automatically. Example: If the result of the evaluation is as follows,
Red Yellow Green Blue Gold 100% 100% 90% 27% 0%
the conservation area being evaluated is level YELLOW. Another example: If the result of the evaluation is as follows,
Red Yellow Green Blue Gold 95% 47% 20% 0% 0%
the conservation area being evaluated is level RED, with a 95% achievement. Another example: If the result of the evaluation is as follows,
Red Yellow Green Blue Gold 100% 85% 27% 9% 0%
the conservation area being evaluated is level RED. How to present the level of a conservation area For reporting purposes then, only the level color and percentage achievement need be presented in reports, or for example, factsheets. Several examples are given below: 100% (means the conservation area is level RED)
100% (means the conservation area is level YELLOW)
100% (means the conservation area is level BLUE)
39
CHAPTER IV REPORTING
A. Evaluation Data Collected
The evaluation data collected is then stored in an electronic file, and saved in a
folder that is structured and named according to the agreed format. Storage of the evaluation data files should be structured so that they are easy to find when needed again. An example of a folder structure for storing data is:
D:\Monitoring Data\Effectiveness
After being stored electronically, the data recorded on the hardcopy of the form are stored in a structured folder. The names of the files must also be standardized to make them easy to find and to compare between years. It is suggested that the following format be used to name files: <name of conservation area_data type_year collected>. Examples:
Gili Matra_effectiveness_baseline2011.xls Gili Matra_effectiveness_monitoring2012.xls
When the data are entered and stored, then they can be analyzed.
B. Analysis Based on the answers on the evaluation score card, the level of the conservation area being evaluated for its effectiveness can be determined; from red, yellow, green, and blue to gold. This is based on macro and micro level evaluation. Each level has a value or achievement percentage. For example conservation are A is level green, with a percentage achievement of 50%. See the end of point D2: Evaluation Method above.
These levels can be compared over time to obtain information about the change in the effectiveness of the management of the area being evaluated at the agreed time intervals. Increased effectiveness of the management of a conservation area over a particular time period does not necessarily mean a change in its level, but could also mean a change in achievement at the same level.
As well as analyzing changes in level and achievement at each level, analysis can also be made of criteria that are not achieved at each level, including levels that have been achieved and levels that wish to be achieved. This analysis produced recommendations, in the form of proposed programs/activities for the management team of the conservation area for management of the conservation that year and/or reporting period.
C. Conclusions
Conclusions are made based on the level and percentage effectiveness achieved for the conservation area. If the evaluation takes the form of monitoring, then the
36 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
36Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
37
37
40
conclusions can also be translated into change in effectiveness over time. Then, the conclusions can also be translated into recommendations or proposed programs/activities for the subsequent year and/or period.
D. Report Structure
The report of the findings of the evaluation of the management of an aquatic, coasts, and small islands conservation area should be presented as structured in Table 4 below: Table 4 – Recommended structure of a report on the findings of an evaluation of the
management of an aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation area
Title Abstract or Summary Table of Contents Description of evaluation team Introduction / Background Management, conservation area resources, and local socio-economic and cultural objectives
Evaluation findings – level of conservation area Conclusions and Recommendations Priority Recommendations Appendices (especially findings of monitoring of management, area resources, and socio-economic and cultural aspects)
41
CHAPTER V RECOMMENDATIONS AND FOLLOW UP ACTION
A. Recommendations
From the results of the evaluation of the management effectiveness of the
conservation area, to progress to the next level of sustainable management, at a minimum it is recommended that the following steps be taken:
a. Evaluation result: Level 1 (Red) Immediately establish a conservation area management unit Immediately prepare a conservation area management plan
b. Evaluation result: Level 2 (Yellow) Implement institutional strengthening Build conservation area infrastructure Perform key management activities
c. Evaluation result: Level 3 (Green) Practice good conservation area management
d. Evaluation result: Level 4 (Blue) Take measures to network with non-governmental organizations to
contribute to management of the conservation area Forge partnerships with other non-governmental parties to manage the
conservation area
e. Evaluation result: Level 5 (Gold) Undertake monitoring and evaluation to maintain the sustainability of the
management of the conservation area B. Follow Up Action
From the results of the evaluation of the management effectiveness of the
conservation area, the problems and weaknesses the management facing in managing the area can be identified. The managers of the conservation area can then draft follow up plans based on the recommendations for improving management effectiveness. For government, the results of the conservation area management evaluation can be used as the basis for evaluating performance, which can then be used to give awards or mete out punishments for conservation area management. Awards Awards are given to management teams that have managed the conservation area effectively to graduate to the next level. The form the awards take will be regulated by the Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands Areas.
Punishments Punishments are meted out to management teams for not implementing the recommendations for a particular level within a certain timeframe, so there is no improvement in management performance and no subsequent change in level. The form the punishments will take will be regulated by the Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands.
38 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
38Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
39
39
42
CHAPTER VI CONCLUSION
These technical guidelines for evaluating the management effectiveness of aquatic, coasts and small islands conservation areas are part of the effort to achieve the target of sustainable management of conservation areas. Enacted in Jakarta
On 9 October 2012
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF
MARINE, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS
Signed
SUDIRMAN SAAD
Deemed a true copy of the original
Head of Legal Affairs, Organization and Public Relations
Achmad Satiri
43
Appendix II: Decree of the Director General of Marine, Coasts and Small Islands Number KEP.44/KP3K/2012 concerning Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas.
LIST OF SCORE CARDS FOR EVALUATING THE MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS
OF AQUATIC, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS CONSERVATION AREAS
FORM DESCRIPTION 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OF THE CONSERVATION
AREA 2 EVALUATION SCORE CARDS:
a. RED (LEVEL 1): CONSERVATION AREA INITIATED b. YELLOW (LEVEL 2): CONSERVATION AREA
ESTABLISHED c. GREEN (LEVEL 3): CONSERVATION AREA MANAGED
MINIMALLY d. BLUE (LEVEL 4): CONSERVATION AREA MANAGED
OPTIMALLY e. GOLD (LEVEL 5): SELF-RELIANT CONSERVATION AREA
Enacted in Jakarta On 9th October 2012
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF MARINE, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS
Signed
SUDIRMAN SAAD
Deemed a true copy of the originalHead of Legal Affairs, Organization and Public Relations Bureau
Achmad Satiri
40 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
40Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
41
41
44
A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION OF THE CONSERVATION AREA Conservation area CODE <record conservation area CODE here> Conservation area NAME <record conservation area NAME here> Conservation area LOCATION <record conservation area LOCATION here> Conservation area COORDINATES Longitude W/E Latitude N/S
Point 1 Point 2 Point 3 Point 4 Point 5
<add as required> Management Goals Note: there can be more
than one goal for each aspect or they can be divided into sub-goals.
Area Resources Goals Socio-Economic & Cultural Goals
Conservation target 1 Note: conservation
targets are the resources that will be managed. They may be species populations, habitats and/or ecosystems.
Conservation target 2 Conservation target 3 Conservation target 4
Socio-economic & cultural target 1
Note: socio-economic and cultural targets include everything that is aimed at providing incentives to increase support for the conservation area. Examples: alternative livelihoods, participation, behavior change, etc.
Socio-economic & cultural target 2
Socio-economic & cultural target 3
Socio-economic & cultural target 4
45
B.
EVA
LUA
TIO
N S
CO
RE
CA
RD
S
Le
vel
Stag
e
Red
1:
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
ea
Initi
ated
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
1:
Init
iati
ve
prop
osal
Prop
osal
to
initi
ate
esta
blis
hmen
t of
the
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea
subm
itted
by
(sel
ect
one)
L
ist
of p
ropo
sers
, if
mor
e th
an
one.
U
ser
mus
t at
tach
initi
ativ
e pr
opos
al d
ocum
ents
as
refe
rred
to
in A
rtic
le 9
cla
use
(2)
of t
he
Min
iste
r of
Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd
Fish
erie
s Reg
ulat
ion
Num
ber
PER.0
2/M
EN/2
009.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Use
r is
as
ked
to c
hoos
e on
e fr
om a
list
of
prop
oser
s.
Whe
re t
here
is m
ore
than
one
pro
pose
r, ju
st
sele
ct t
he m
ain
prop
oser
and
list
the
ot
her
prop
oser
s in
the
ve
rific
atio
n co
lum
n. I
n ca
ses
whe
re t
he a
rea
has
alre
ady
been
id
entif
ied/
res
erve
d, t
he
answ
er t
o th
is q
uest
ion
is t
aken
to
be ‘Y
es’.
M1
Indi
vidu
al
Com
mun
ity g
roup
Res
earc
h in
stitu
te
Educ
atio
nal i
nstit
ute
Gov
ernm
ent
orga
niza
tion
NG
O
42 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
42Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
43
4346
Leve
l RED
: st
age
1 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
init
iate
d (c
onti
nued
)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
1:
Init
iati
ve
prop
osal
Prop
osal
to
initi
ate
esta
blis
hmen
t of
the
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea
is s
ubm
itted
to:
(se
lect
one
) D
ocum
ents
as
refe
rred
to
in
Artic
le 1
1 cl
ause
(2)
of
the
Min
iste
r of
Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd
Fish
erie
s Reg
ulat
ion
Num
ber
PER.0
2/M
EN/2
009.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Use
r se
lect
s ‘Y
es’ t
o an
swer
this
ques
tion
if th
e pr
opos
al is
as
refe
rred
to in
Art
icle
11
claus
es (1
) and
(2) o
f the
M
inist
er o
f Mar
ine
Affa
irs
and
Fish
erie
s Re
gula
tion
Num
ber 0
2/20
09. U
ser
mus
t sel
ect ‘
No’ f
or
ques
tion
M2b
. In
case
s w
here
the
area
has
alre
ady
been
iden
tifie
d/ re
serv
ed,
the
answ
er to
this
ques
tion
is ta
ken
to b
e ‘Y
es’.
M2a
Nat
iona
l gov
ernm
ent
or lo
cal
gove
rnm
ent
with
out
prel
imin
ary
surv
ey a
nd m
ap.
M2b
N
atio
nal g
over
nmen
t or
loca
l go
vern
men
t w
ith p
relim
inar
y su
rvey
and
map
.
Doc
umen
ts a
s re
ferr
ed t
o in
Ar
ticle
10
of t
he M
inis
ter
of
Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd F
ishe
ries
Reg
ulat
ion
Num
ber
PER.0
2/M
EN/2
009.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Use
r se
lect
s ‘Y
es’ t
o an
swer
this
ques
tion
if th
e pr
opos
al is
as
refe
rred
to in
Art
icle
10
claus
es (1
), (2
) and
(3) o
f th
e M
inist
er o
f Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd F
isher
ies
Regu
latio
n Nu
mbe
r 02
/200
9. U
ser m
ust s
elec
t ‘N
o’ fo
r que
stio
n M
2a. I
n ca
ses
whe
re th
e ar
ea h
as
alre
ady
been
iden
tifie
d/
rese
rved
, the
ans
wer
to th
is qu
estio
n is
take
n to
be
‘Yes
’.
47
Leve
l RED
: st
age
1 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
init
iate
d (c
onti
nued
)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
2. A
rea
iden
tifi
cati
on
and
inve
ntor
y
M3
Has
a s
urve
y an
d ev
alua
tion
of the
pr
opos
ed a
rea
been
car
ried
out
purs
uant
to
the
Min
iste
r of
Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd F
ishe
ries
Reg
ulat
ions
N
umbe
r PE
R.02
/MEN
/200
9 an
d/or
PE
R.1
7/M
EN/2
008?
Stud
y re
port
s pu
rsua
nt t
o th
e M
inis
ter
of M
arin
e Af
fairs
and
Fi
sher
ies
Reg
ulat
ions
Num
ber
PER.0
2/M
EN/2
009
and/
or
PER.1
7/M
EN/2
008.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
M4
Has
soc
ializ
atio
n of
the
pro
pose
d ar
ea b
een
carr
ied
out
purs
uant
to
the
Min
iste
r of
Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd
Fish
erie
s Reg
ulat
ions
Num
ber
PER
.02/
MEN
/200
9 an
d/or
PE
R.1
7/M
EN/2
008?
Soci
aliz
atio
n re
port
s pu
rsua
nt t
o th
e M
inis
ter
of M
arin
e Af
fairs
and
Fi
sher
ies
Reg
ulat
ions
Num
ber
PER.0
2/M
EN/2
009
and/
or
PER.1
7/M
EN/2
008.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
M5
Have
pub
lic c
onsu
ltatio
ns re
gard
ing
the
prop
osed
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea b
een
carr
ied
out p
ursu
ant t
o th
e M
inist
er o
f M
arin
e Af
fairs
and
Fish
erie
s Re
gula
tions
Nu
mbe
r PE
R.02
/MEN
/200
9 an
d/or
PE
R.17
/MEN
/200
8?
Publ
ic c
onsu
ltatio
n re
port
s pu
rsua
nt
to t
he M
inis
ter
of M
arin
e Af
fairs
and
Fi
sher
ies
Reg
ulat
ions
Num
ber
PER.0
2/M
EN/2
009
and/
or
PER.1
7/M
EN/2
008.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
M6
Has
coor
dina
tion
with
rel
evan
t go
vern
men
t age
ncie
s re
gard
ing
the
prop
osed
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea b
een
carr
ied
out p
ursu
ant t
o th
e M
inist
er o
f M
arin
e Af
fairs
and
Fish
erie
s Re
gula
tions
Nu
mbe
r PE
R.02
/MEN
/200
9 an
d/or
PE
R.17
/MEN
/200
8?
Coor
dina
tion
repo
rts
purs
uant
to
the
Min
iste
r of
Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd
Fish
erie
s Reg
ulat
ions
Num
ber
PER.0
2/M
EN/2
009
and/
or
PER.1
7/M
EN/2
008.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
M7
Have
the
resu
lts o
f ide
ntific
ation
and
in
vent
ory
been
use
d to
reco
mm
end
the
prop
osed
cons
erva
tion
area
pur
suan
t to
the
Mini
ster o
f Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd F
isher
ies
Regu
lation
s Num
ber P
ER.0
2/ME
N/20
09
and/
or P
ER.1
7/ME
N/20
08?
Rec
omm
enda
tion
for
the
prop
osed
co
nser
vatio
n ar
ea p
ursu
ant
to A
rtic
le
19 o
f th
e M
inis
ter
of M
arin
e Af
fairs
an
d Fi
sher
ies
Reg
ulat
ion
Num
ber
PER.0
2/M
EN/2
009
and/
or A
rtic
le 1
5 of
Reg
ulat
ion
Num
ber
PER.1
7/M
EN/2
008.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
44 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
44Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
45
4548
Leve
l RED
: st
age
1 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
init
iate
d (c
onti
nued
)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
3. R
eser
vati
on
of
con
serv
atio
n
area
M8a
H
as t
he a
rea
been
res
erve
d,
but
not
purs
uant
to
the
Min
iste
r of
Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd F
ishe
ries
Reg
ulat
ions
Num
ber
PER.0
2/M
EN/2
009
and/
or
PER.1
7/M
EN/2
008?
Dec
ree/
regu
latio
n, t
hat
will
nee
d to
be
revi
sed
acco
rdin
gly
(ref
er t
o Ar
ticle
20
clau
se (
2) o
f th
e M
inis
ter
of M
arin
e Af
fairs
and
Fi
sher
ies
Reg
ulat
ion
Num
ber
02/2
009)
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Are
as
are
gene
rally
res
erve
d by
dec
ree/
regu
latio
n.
M8b
H
as t
he a
rea
been
res
erve
d,
purs
uant
to
the
Min
iste
r of
M
arin
e Af
fairs
and
Fis
herie
s Reg
ulat
ions
Num
ber
PER.0
2/M
EN/2
009
and/
or
PER.1
7/M
EN/2
008?
Dec
ree/
regu
latio
n re
serv
ing
the
area
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y. A
reas
ar
e ge
nera
lly r
eser
ved
by d
ecre
e/re
gula
tion.
To
tal n
umbe
r of
‘Yes
’ ans
wer
s
Perc
enta
ge
49
Leve
l St
age
Yel
low
2:
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
ea E
stab
lishe
d
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
4.
Man
agem
ent
orga
niz
atio
nal
un
it a
nd
pers
onne
l
K9
Are
ther
e co
nser
vatio
n ar
ea
man
agem
ent
pers
onne
l in
plac
e?
Org
aniz
atio
nal s
truc
ture
and
/or
mai
n ta
sks
& f
unct
ions
do
cum
ent.
Peop
le/in
divid
uals
or a
n or
gani
zatio
n w
ith th
e fu
nctio
n an
d ta
sk o
f man
agin
g th
e ar
ea. F
or e
xam
ple:
re
spon
sibilit
y fo
r man
agin
g th
e co
nser
vatio
n ar
ea is
a
part
of th
e jo
b de
scrip
tion
of
the
Coas
ts a
nd S
mal
l Isla
nds
Mon
itorin
g Se
ctio
n.
K10
Doe
s th
e m
anag
emen
t un
it ha
ve t
he p
erso
nnel
app
oint
ed
by d
ecre
e?
Dec
ree
of t
he lo
cal g
over
nmen
t he
ad/
min
iste
r/un
it he
ad.
Org
aniz
atio
nal s
truc
ture
and
/or
mai
n ta
sks
& f
unct
ions
do
cum
ent.
Peop
le/in
divi
dual
s or
or
gani
zatio
n ap
poin
ted
and
dete
rmin
ed b
y D
ecre
e.
K11
Is t
here
an
adeq
uate
num
ber
of
pers
onne
l in
the
man
agem
ent
unit
to r
un t
he o
rgan
izat
ion?
Org
aniz
atio
nal s
truc
ture
and
/or
mai
n ta
sks
& f
unct
ions
do
cum
ent
Man
ager
s jo
b de
scrip
tions
.
An a
dequ
ate
num
ber
of
pers
onne
l to
exec
ute
the
mai
n ta
sks
& f
unct
ions
of
the
orga
niza
tion
as p
er
gove
rnm
ent
min
imum
st
anda
rd.
K12
Hav
e th
e m
anag
ers
had
basi
c co
nser
vatio
n tr
aini
ng?
Trai
ning
rep
orts
or
cert
ifica
tes
or
othe
r pr
oof.
Take
n pa
rt in
at
leas
t 1
trai
ning
cou
rse
appr
opria
te t
o m
ain
task
s &
fun
ctio
ns, s
uch
as M
PA
101,
fis
h re
sour
ces
cons
erva
tion
trai
ning
, di
ving
and
mon
itorin
g tr
aini
ng, e
tc.
46 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
46Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
47
4750
Leve
l YEL
LOW
: st
age
2 –
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea e
stab
lishe
d (c
onti
nued
)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
5.
Man
agem
ent
and
zon
ing
plan
s
K13
Wha
t is
the
sta
tus
of t
he m
anag
emen
t pl
an?
No
man
agem
ent
plan
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
If
the
answ
er is
‘Yes
’, do
not
co
mpl
ete
the
tabl
e fo
r cr
iteria
5 (
man
agem
ent
and
zoni
ng p
lans
).
Man
agem
ent
plan
be
ing
draf
ted.
D
raft
man
agem
ent
plan
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y. I
f th
e an
swer
is ‘Y
es’,
answ
er
‘No’
for
the
oth
er
ques
tions
in K
13.
Man
agem
ent
plan
fin
aliz
ed.
Fin
aliz
ed m
anag
emen
t pl
an.
Doc
umen
t si
gned
by
the
head
of
the
man
agem
ent
unit.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
If th
e an
swer
is ‘Y
es’,
answ
er ‘N
o’
for t
he o
ther
que
stio
ns in
K1
3. T
he m
anag
emen
t do
cum
ent h
as b
een
final
ized
and
subm
itted
for a
ppro
val.
The
draf
ting
phas
es o
f the
m
anag
emen
t doc
umen
t are
pe
r Arti
cle 3
0 of
Reg
ulat
ion
of
the
Min
ister
of M
arin
e Af
fairs
an
d Fi
sher
ies
30/2
010.
K1
4 D
oes
the
man
agem
ent
plan
co
ntai
n re
sour
ces
and
soci
o-ec
onom
ic a
nd c
ultu
ral
info
rmat
ion
that
can
be
used
as
base
line
data
(t 0
)?
M
anag
emen
t pl
an:
man
agem
ent
plan
mat
rix/
sum
mar
y, c
onta
inin
g in
form
atio
n ab
out
reso
urce
s –
base
line
data
.
Oth
er s
uppo
rtin
g do
cum
ents
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Info
rmat
ion
abou
t res
ourc
es a
nd s
ocio
-ec
onom
ic an
d cu
ltura
l co
nditio
ns in
eac
h co
nser
vatio
n ar
ea, s
uch
as
cora
l ree
f cov
erag
e, ta
rget
fis
h ab
unda
nce,
loca
l co
mm
unity
per
cept
ions
, fis
hers
’ inco
mes
, etc
.
51
Leve
l YEL
LOW
: st
age
2 –
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea e
stab
lishe
d (c
onti
nued
)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
6. F
acili
ties
an
d in
fras
truc
ture
to
sup
port
m
anag
emen
t
K15
Doe
s th
e m
anag
emen
t un
it ha
ve
offic
es?
Rep
orts
and
phy
sica
l che
cks.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
K16
Doe
s th
e m
anag
emen
t un
it ha
ve
an in
form
atio
n bo
ard?
Rep
orts
and
phy
sica
l che
cks.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y. A
n in
form
atio
n bo
ard
that
ex
plai
ns a
t a
min
imum
the
bo
unda
ries
of t
he
cons
erva
tion
area
, and
its
zoni
ng s
yste
m a
nd w
hat
activ
ities
are
pe
rmitt
ed/n
ot p
erm
itted
in
the
cons
erva
tion
area
. K1
7 D
oes
the
man
agem
ent
unit
have
m
inim
um o
ffic
e eq
uipm
ent?
Rep
orts
and
phy
sica
l che
cks.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y. T
he
min
imum
of
equi
pmen
t th
at e
nabl
es t
he
orga
niza
tion
to f
unct
ion,
su
ch a
s fu
rnitu
re, d
ata
proc
essi
ng t
ools
, co
mm
unic
atio
n to
ols.
K1
8 D
oes
the
man
agem
ent
unit
have
m
anag
emen
t fa
cilit
ies
(mon
itorin
g to
ols,
co
mm
unic
atio
n to
ols)
?
Rep
orts
and
phy
sica
l che
cks.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
48 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
48Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
49
4952
Leve
l YEL
LOW
: st
age
2 –
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea e
stab
lishe
d (c
onti
nued
)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
7.
Man
agem
ent
fund
ing
supp
ort
K19
Wha
t is
the
sta
tus
of m
anag
emen
t fu
ndin
g su
ppor
t?
No
man
agem
ent
fund
ing
supp
ort.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
If
the
answ
er t
o th
is q
uest
ion
is ‘Y
es’,
the
answ
er t
o th
e ot
her
ques
tion
in
K19
is ‘N
o’.
Man
agem
ent
fund
ing
supp
ort,
bu
t no
t su
ffic
ient
(en
ough
to
oper
ate
offic
e).
Man
agem
ent
unit
finan
cial
re
port
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
If
the
answ
er t
o th
is q
uest
ion
is ‘Y
es’,
the
answ
er t
o th
e ot
her
ques
tion
in
K19
is ‘N
o’.
Tota
l num
ber
of ‘Y
es’ a
nsw
ers
Pe
rcen
tage
53
Leve
l St
age
Gre
en
3: C
onse
rvat
ion
Area
Man
aged
Min
imal
ly
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
4.
Man
agem
ent
orga
niz
atio
nal
un
it a
nd
pers
onne
l
H20
Ar
e th
ere
suffi
cient
per
sonn
el in
the
man
agem
ent u
nit t
o ex
ecut
e th
e m
anag
emen
t fun
ctio
ns (s
urve
illanc
e,
reso
urce
mon
itorin
g, s
ocio
-eco
nom
ic & c
ultu
ral m
onito
ring)
?
Doc
umen
ts a
nd/o
r re
port
s re
late
d to
the
man
agem
ent
pers
onne
l fun
ctio
ns.
Self-
expl
anat
ory
H21
D
o pe
rson
nel i
n th
e m
anag
emen
t un
it ha
ve q
ualif
icat
ions
in a
t lea
st
two
of th
e fo
llow
ing
requ
ired
man
agem
ent c
ompe
tenc
ies
(pla
nnin
g, m
onito
ring
& e
valu
atio
n,
surv
eilla
nce,
res
earc
h, res
ourc
es
and
socio
-eco
nom
ic an
d cu
ltura
l m
onito
ring)
?
Cert
ifica
tes
of c
ompe
tenc
y.
Self-
expl
anat
ory
H22
H
as t
he m
anag
emen
t un
it in
itiat
ed p
artn
ersh
ips
with
st
akeh
olde
rs?
Stak
ehol
der
com
mun
icat
ion
repo
rts.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y
5. F
acili
ties
an
d in
fras
truc
ture
to
sup
port
m
anag
emen
t
H23
D
oes
the
man
agem
ent
unit
offic
e ha
ve a
dequ
ate
offic
e eq
uipm
ent?
Rep
orts
and
phy
sica
l che
cks.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y
H24
D
oes
the
man
agem
ent
unit
have
m
anag
emen
t su
ppor
ting
faci
litie
s an
d in
fras
truc
ture
?
Rep
orts
(on
sur
veill
ance
eq
uipm
ent,
res
ourc
e m
onito
ring
equi
pmen
t, c
omm
unic
atio
n/
soci
aliz
atio
n to
ols
and
othe
r fa
cilit
ies,
bou
ndar
y m
arke
rs)
and
phys
ical
che
cks.
Self-
expl
anat
ory
50 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
50Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
51
5154
Leve
l GR
EEN
: st
age
3 –
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea m
anag
ed m
inim
ally
(co
ntin
ued)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
6.
Man
agem
ent
fund
ing
supp
ort
H25
H
as a
man
agem
ent
fund
ing
plan
bee
n pr
epar
ed?
Stra
tegy
doc
umen
ts a
nd f
undi
ng
plan
s.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
H26
H
as t
he m
anag
emen
t un
it se
cure
d m
anag
emen
t fu
ndin
g su
ppor
t fr
om t
he lo
cal
gove
rnm
ent
budg
et /
sta
te
budg
et?
Man
agem
ent
unit
finan
ce r
epor
ts
that
mee
t st
anda
rds
appl
icab
le in
In
done
sia
& a
nnua
l wor
k pl
an.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
H27
H
ave
plan
s be
en m
ade
to
secu
re f
undi
ng f
or m
anag
emen
t of
the
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea?
Alte
rnat
ive
budg
et p
ropo
sal
docu
men
ts, l
ette
rs o
f ap
plic
atio
n,
prop
osal
s an
d ot
her
docu
men
tatio
n.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
8. A
ppro
val o
f m
anag
emen
t an
d zo
nin
g pl
ans
H28
H
as t
he f
inal
ized
man
agem
ent
plan
bee
n su
bmitt
ed f
or
appr
oval
?
Prop
osal
doc
umen
ts a
nd p
ropo
sal
rece
ipt.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
H29
H
as t
he m
anag
emen
t pl
an b
een
appr
oved
?
D
ecre
e ap
prov
ing
the
man
agem
ent
plan
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
9.
Man
agem
ent
stan
dard
op
erat
ing
proc
edur
es
(SO
Ps)
H30
Ar
e th
ere
SOPs
for
off
ice
adm
inis
trat
ion
and
finan
cial
m
anag
emen
t?
SOP
docu
men
ts. P
leas
e st
ate.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
H31
Ar
e th
ere
SOPs
for
faci
litie
s an
d in
fras
truc
ture
(m
inim
um
stan
dard
s)?
SOP
docu
men
ts o
n fa
cilit
ies
and
infr
astr
uctu
re
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
H32
Ar
e th
ere
man
agem
ent S
OPs
(for
in
stitu
tiona
l str
engt
heni
ng, j
oint
pa
trol
s, re
sour
ce m
anag
emen
t, an
d so
cio-
econ
omic
& c
ultu
ral
stre
ngth
enin
g) th
at m
eet t
he
min
imum
sta
ndar
ds?
SOP
docu
men
ts. P
leas
e st
ate.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
55
Leve
l GR
EEN
: st
age
3 –
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea m
anag
ed m
inim
ally
(co
ntin
ued)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
10
. Im
plem
enta
tio
n of
m
anag
emen
t an
d zo
nin
g pl
ans
H33
Ha
s th
e in
stitu
tiona
l stre
ngth
enin
g st
rate
gy b
een
impl
emen
ted?
Ac
tivity
mon
itorin
g &
eva
luat
ion
repo
rts.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
H34
H
as a
bas
elin
e su
rvey
of
reso
urce
s be
en c
ondu
cted
?
M
anag
emen
t pl
an a
nd/o
r su
rvey
re
port
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
H35
H
as t
he r
esou
rce
man
agem
ent
stre
ngth
enin
g st
rate
gy b
een
impl
emen
ted?
Activ
ity m
onito
ring
& e
valu
atio
n re
port
s.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
H36
H
as a
soc
io-e
cono
mic
and
cu
ltura
l bas
elin
e su
rvey
bee
n co
nduc
ted?
Man
agem
ent
plan
and
/or
surv
ey
repo
rts.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
H37
H
as a
soc
io-e
cono
mic
and
cu
ltura
l str
engt
heni
ng s
trat
egy
been
impl
emen
ted?
Activ
ity m
onito
ring
& e
valu
atio
n re
port
s.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
H38
Ar
e th
ere
initi
ativ
es t
o m
ake
use
of t
he a
rea
(at
leas
t on
e?)
Activ
ity m
onito
ring
& e
valu
atio
n re
port
s.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
11
. D
esig
nati
on o
f A
quat
ic
Con
serv
atio
n
Are
a
H39
H
as t
he p
ropo
sal f
or
desi
gnat
ion
been
sub
mitt
ed t
o th
e M
inis
ter
for
Mar
ine
Affa
irs
and
Fish
erie
s?
Prop
osal
doc
umen
ts a
nd r
ecei
pt
of s
ubm
issi
on o
f do
cum
ents
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
H40
H
as t
he c
onse
rvat
ion
area
bee
n de
sign
ated
by
the
Min
iste
r of
M
arin
e Af
fairs
and
Fis
herie
s?
Dec
ree
of t
he M
inis
ter.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
Tota
l num
ber
of ‘Y
es’ a
nsw
ers
Perc
enta
ge
52 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
52Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
53
5356
Leve
l St
age
Blu
e 4:
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
ea M
anag
ed O
ptim
ally
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
4.
Man
agem
ent
orga
niz
atio
nal
un
it a
nd
pers
onne
l
B41
Do
pers
onne
l in
the
man
agem
ent
unit
have
qu
alifi
catio
ns in
the
req
uire
d m
anag
emen
t co
mpe
tenc
ies?
Docu
men
ts a
nd/o
r rep
orts
re
leva
nt to
man
agem
ent
pers
onne
l cap
acity
(pla
nnin
g,
mon
itorin
g &
eva
luat
ion,
su
rvei
llanc
e, re
sear
ch, r
esou
rces
an
d so
cio-e
cono
mic
and
cultu
ral
mon
itorin
g). T
rain
ing
certi
ficat
es
and/
or d
iplo
mas
as
proo
f of
qual
ifica
tions
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory
5. F
acili
ties
and
infr
astr
uctu
re to
su
ppor
t m
anag
emen
t
B42
Are
the
requ
ired
faci
litie
s an
d in
fras
truc
ture
in p
lace
?
Rep
orts
and
phy
sica
l che
cks.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y
6.
Man
agem
ent
fund
ing
supp
ort
B43
Is m
anag
emen
t fu
ndin
g su
ppor
t av
aila
ble
as p
lann
ed?
Activ
ity im
plem
enta
tion
and
fund
ing
sour
ce r
epor
ts.
Res
pons
e to
thi
s qu
estio
n re
fers
to
the
budg
et
requ
irem
ent
per
ques
tion
H27
. 9
. M
anag
emen
t st
anda
rd
oper
atin
g pr
oced
ures
(S
OP
s)
B44
Are
ther
e tr
aini
ng a
nd
educ
atio
n SO
Ps in
pla
ce?
Trai
ning
and
edu
catio
n SO
P do
cum
ents
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B45
Are
the
SOPs
on
aqua
tic
tour
ism
act
iviti
es in
pla
ce?
Eco-
tour
ism
SO
P do
cum
ents
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
B46
Are
ther
e SO
Ps o
n aq
uacu
lture
in
pla
ce?
Aqua
cultu
re S
OP
docu
men
ts.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
B47
Are
ther
e SO
Ps o
n fis
hing
in
plac
e?
Fish
ing
SOP
docu
men
ts.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
57
Leve
l BLU
E: s
tage
4 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
man
aged
opt
imal
ly (
cont
inue
d)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
11. D
esig
natio
n of
Aq
uatic
Co
nser
vatio
n Ar
ea
B48
Has
des
igna
tion
of t
he
cons
erva
tion
area
bee
n pu
blic
ized
?
Rep
orts
of
soci
aliz
atio
n ac
tiviti
es,
incl
udin
g at
tend
ance
list
s an
d ph
otog
raph
s of
act
iviti
es.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
12
. Bou
ndar
y m
arki
ng
B49
Wha
t is
the
sta
tus
of t
he b
ound
ary
mar
king
? -
Boun
dary
mar
king
initi
ated
.
Dec
ree
of b
ound
ary
mar
king
co
mm
ittee
as
per
Artic
le 2
4 of
Reg
ulat
ion
of t
he M
inis
ter
of
Mar
ine
Affa
irs a
nd F
ishe
ries
Num
ber
PER.0
2/M
EN/2
009.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
- Bo
unda
ry m
arki
ng in
pr
ogre
ss.
Activ
ity r
epor
ts (
mea
surin
g,
map
ping
and
soc
ializ
atio
n).
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
- Bo
unda
ry m
arki
ng a
ppro
ved.
Not
ifica
tion
of b
ound
ary
mar
king
es
tabl
ished
by
Dec
ree
of th
e M
inist
er
of M
arin
e Af
fairs
& F
isher
ies.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
13
. Ins
titu
-ti
onal
izat
ion
B50
Hav
e pa
rtne
rshi
ps w
ith
stak
ehol
ders
bee
n ag
reed
?
Ac
tivity
coo
rdin
atio
n re
port
s, a
gree
-m
ents
, joi
nt p
rogr
ams,
and
sim
ilar.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B51
Hav
e pa
rtne
rshi
ps w
ith s
take
hold
ers
been
impl
emen
ted?
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y. U
sers
sh
ould
cho
ose
one
of
the
optio
ns p
rovi
ded.
N
o
Y
es, b
ut in
cide
ntal
.
Activ
ity r
epor
ts.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Pa
rtne
rshi
ps a
re
tem
pora
ry o
r inc
iden
tal.
Yes
, sus
tain
able
pa
rtne
rshi
ps.
Activ
ity r
epor
ts.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
Part
ners
hips
im
plem
ente
d as
pla
nned
.
54 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
54Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
55
5558
Leve
l BLU
E: s
tage
4 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
man
aged
opt
imal
ly (
cont
inue
d)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
13
. In
stit
uti
onal
izat
ion
B52
Has
str
engt
heni
ng o
f lo
cal
inst
itutio
ns b
een
impl
emen
ted?
Activ
ity
repo
rts,
te
chni
cal
assi
stan
ce,
guid
ance
, tr
aini
ng,
exte
nsio
n.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B53
Wha
t is
the
sta
tus
of
enfo
rcem
ent
of r
ules
(m
onito
ring
& s
urve
illan
ce)
in
the
cons
erva
tion
area
by
the
man
agem
ent
unit?
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
Use
rs s
houl
d se
lect
on
e of
the
opt
ions
pr
ovid
ed.
Rul
es a
re n
ot e
nfor
ced.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Rul
es a
re c
onsi
sten
tly
enfo
rced
.
Reg
ulat
ion
soci
aliz
atio
n re
port
s;
info
rmat
ion
boar
ds;
surv
eilla
nce
repo
rts.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B54
Wha
t is
the
sta
tus
of
com
mun
ity b
ased
sur
veill
ance
in
the
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea?
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
Use
rs s
houl
d se
lect
on
e of
the
opt
ions
pr
ovid
ed.
N
ot d
one.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Initi
ated
and
in p
rogr
ess
(org
aniz
atio
n &
sys
tem
).
Doc
umen
ts (
repo
rts
of a
ctiv
ities
an
d fo
rmat
ion
of c
omm
unity
su
rvei
llanc
e gr
oup)
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Reg
ular
sur
veill
ance
car
ried
out.
D
ocum
ents
(re
port
s of
com
mun
ity
surv
eilla
nce
activ
ities
).
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
59
Leve
l BLU
E: s
tage
4 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
man
aged
opt
imal
ly (
cont
inue
d)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
13
. In
stit
uti
onal
izat
ion
B55
Is t
he c
onse
rvat
ion
area
m
entio
ned
in t
he N
atio
nal
Med
ium
-Ter
m D
evel
opm
ent
Plan
/ N
atio
nal G
over
nmen
t St
rate
gic
Plan
and
/or
the
Loca
l M
ediu
m-T
erm
Dev
elop
men
t Pl
an /
Loc
al G
over
nmen
t St
rate
gic
Plan
?
Nat
iona
l Med
ium
-Ter
m
Plan
/Nat
iona
l Gov
ernm
ent
Stra
tegi
c Pl
an;
Loca
l Med
ium
-Ter
m
Dev
elop
men
t Pl
an /
Loc
al
Gov
ernm
ent
Stra
tegi
c Pl
an
docu
men
ts.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B56
Is t
he c
onse
rvat
ion
area
m
entio
ned
in t
he A
rea
Zoni
ng
Plan
/ C
oast
s an
d Sm
all
Isla
nds
Area
Zon
ing
Plan
?
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
Use
rs s
houl
d se
lect
on
e of
the
opt
ions
pr
ovid
ed.
N
o
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
In t
he p
roce
ss o
f be
ing
brou
ght
into
line
with
the
no
men
clat
ure
of c
urre
nt
regu
latio
ns
Activ
ity d
ocum
ents
/rep
orts
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
In
the
pro
cess
of
bein
g de
sign
ated
by
loca
l re
gula
tion
Activ
ity d
ocum
ents
/rep
orts
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Ye
s, t
he c
onse
rvat
ion
area
is
men
tione
d in
the
Are
a Zo
ning
Pla
n /
Coas
ts a
nd
Smal
l Isl
ands
Are
a Zo
ning
Pl
an
Area
Zon
ing
Plan
/ C
oast
s an
d Sm
all I
slan
ds A
rea
Zoni
ng P
lan
docu
men
ts.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
56 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
56Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
57
5760
Leve
l BLU
E: s
tage
4 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
man
aged
opt
imal
ly (
cont
inue
d)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
14
. Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t
B57
Wha
t is
the
con
ditio
n of
fis
h re
sour
ce h
abita
ts in
the
co
nser
vatio
n ar
ea?
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
B57A
H
as t
here
bee
n im
prov
emen
t to
th
e co
nditi
on o
f ha
bita
ts in
the
co
re z
one,
sus
tain
able
fis
hing
zo
ne, u
se z
one,
res
tric
ted
use
zone
, and
/or
othe
r zo
nes,
as
indi
cate
d fo
r ex
ampl
e by
an
incr
ease
in t
he c
over
age
of
cora
l ree
f ec
osys
tem
s an
d/or
se
agra
ss m
eado
w a
nd/o
r m
angr
ove
fore
st?
Base
line
cond
ition
(t 0
) in
eac
h zo
ne c
ompa
red
with
the
res
ults
of
mon
itorin
g of
fish
res
ourc
e ha
bita
ts in
the
se z
ones
(sh
ould
re
fer
to t
empo
ral p
rogr
essi
on
data
).
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B57B
H
as th
ere
been
impr
ovem
ent t
o th
e co
nditi
on o
f hab
itats
in th
e co
re z
one,
sus
tain
able
fish
erie
s zo
ne, u
se z
one,
rest
ricte
d us
e zo
ne, a
nd/o
r oth
er z
ones
, as
indi
cate
d fo
r exa
mpl
e by
an
incr
ease
in th
e ar
ea o
f cor
al ree
f ec
osys
tem
s an
d/or
sea
gras
s m
eado
w a
nd/o
r man
grov
e fo
rest
?
Base
line
cond
ition
(t 0
) in
eac
h zo
ne c
ompa
red
with
the
res
ults
of
mon
itorin
g of
fish
res
ourc
e ha
bita
ts in
the
se z
ones
(sh
ould
re
fer
to t
empo
ral p
rogr
essi
on
data
).
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B57C
H
as t
he p
hysi
cal-c
hem
ical
-ge
olog
ical
qua
lity
of t
he w
ater
s in
the
cor
e zo
ne, s
usta
inab
le
fishe
ries
zone
, use
zon
e,
rest
ricte
d us
e zo
ne, a
nd/o
r ot
her
zone
s be
en m
aint
aine
d/
pres
erve
d?
Base
line
cond
ition
(t 0
) in
eac
h zo
ne c
ompa
red
with
the
res
ults
of
mon
itorin
g of
fish
res
ourc
e ha
bita
ts in
the
se z
ones
(sh
ould
re
fer
to t
empo
ral p
rogr
essi
on
data
).
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
61
Leve
l BLU
E: s
tage
4 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
man
aged
opt
imal
ly (
cont
inue
d)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
4. R
esou
rce
Man
agem
ent
B58
Wha
t is
the
con
ditio
n of
fis
h po
pula
tions
or
non-
fish
targ
et
spec
ies
popu
latio
ns in
the
co
nser
vatio
n ar
ea?
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y. U
sers
sh
ould
sel
ect o
ne fr
om th
e op
tions
B58
A to
B58
F th
at
is m
ost r
elev
ant t
o th
e sit
uatio
n an
d ty
pe o
f are
a.
B58A
H
ave
fish
popu
latio
ns b
een
mai
ntai
ned
or in
crea
sed
in t
he
core
zon
e, s
usta
inab
le f
ishe
ries
zone
, and
use
zon
e?
Fish
pop
ulat
ion
mon
itorin
g re
port
s fo
r co
nser
vatio
n ta
rget
s (in
clud
ing
biom
ass,
num
ber
of f
ish
spec
ies,
ab
unda
nce,
div
ersi
ty).
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B58B
H
as th
e qu
ality
(le
ngth
and
wei
ght)
of
dom
inan
t fish
spe
cies
in th
e co
re
zone
, sus
tain
able
fish
erie
s zo
ne, u
se
zone
and
/or r
estr
icted
use
zon
e (c
aptu
re fi
sher
ies)
bee
n m
aint
aine
d or
impr
oved
?
Qua
lity
(leng
th/w
eigh
t) m
onito
ring
repo
rts
of f
ish
in t
hese
zon
es.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B58C
H
as t
he v
olum
e of
fis
hers
’ cat
ches
in
the
sus
tain
able
fis
herie
s zo
ne/r
estr
icte
d us
e zo
ne b
een
mai
ntai
ned
or im
prov
ed?
Mon
itorin
g re
port
s on
the
vol
ume
of
fishe
rs’ c
atch
es (
tota
l bio
mas
s pe
r nu
mbe
r of
fis
hers
per
uni
t/tim
e pe
riod)
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B58D
Ha
ve fi
sher
pro
duct
ion
volu
mes
in
the
sust
aina
ble
fishe
ries
zone
/ re
stric
ted
use
zone
(aqu
acul
ture
) be
en m
aint
aine
d or
impr
oved
?
Mon
itorin
g re
port
s on
aqu
acul
ture
pr
oduc
tion
volu
mes
(bi
omas
s pe
r nu
mbe
r of
fis
hers
per
uni
t/tim
e pe
riod)
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B58E
H
ave
the
num
ber
and
dive
rsity
of
non-
fish
targ
et s
peci
es in
the
cor
e zo
ne, s
usta
inab
le u
se z
one
and/
or
rest
ricte
d us
e zo
ne b
een
mai
ntai
ned
or in
crea
sed?
Mon
itorin
g re
port
s on
num
ber
and
dive
rsity
of
non-
fish
targ
et s
peci
es.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B58F
Ha
ve p
opul
atio
ns o
f end
emic
spec
ies
been
mai
ntai
ned
or in
crea
sed?
M
onito
ring
repo
rts
on e
ndem
ic
spec
ies
popu
latio
ns.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
58Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
For
Eva
luat
ing
The
Man
agem
ent E
ffect
iven
ess
of A
quat
ic, C
oast
s an
d Sm
all I
slan
ds C
onse
rvat
ion
Area
s (E
-KKP
3K)
5962
Leve
l BLU
E: s
tage
4 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
man
aged
opt
imal
ly (
cont
inue
d)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
14
. Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t
B59
Has
res
earc
h an
d de
velo
pmen
t re
leva
nt t
o th
e ar
ea b
een
carr
ied
out
to s
uppo
rt
man
agem
ent
activ
ities
?
Publ
ishe
d re
sear
ch &
dev
elop
men
t do
cum
ents
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
B60
Is u
se o
f the
are
a’s
reso
urce
s or
gani
zed,
with
out h
avin
g a
nega
tive
impa
ct o
n ha
bita
ts/p
opul
atio
ns in
the
area
?
Anal
ysis
of
reso
urce
use
rep
orts
an
d ha
bita
t/po
pula
tion
mon
itorin
g re
port
s.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
15
. Soc
io-
econ
omic
&
cult
ura
l m
anag
emen
t
B61
Doe
s m
anag
emen
t of
the
co
nser
vatio
n ar
ea
acco
mm
odat
e lo
cal t
radi
tiona
l an
d cu
ltura
l con
ditio
ns a
nd/o
r lo
cal k
now
ledg
e?
Rep
orts
of
inte
rvie
ws
with
in
dige
nous
peo
ples
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
B62
Has
the
leve
l of
com
mun
ity
supp
ort
for
man
agem
ent
of
the
cons
erva
tion
area
in
crea
sed?
Rep
ort
of m
onito
ring
of lo
cal
com
mun
ity p
erce
ptio
ns (
whi
ch
indi
cate
incr
ease
d co
mm
unity
aw
aren
ess
of a
nd a
ctio
n th
at
supp
orts
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea
man
agem
ent)
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B63
Has
com
mun
ity p
artic
ipat
ion
in
man
agem
ent
of t
he
cons
erva
tion
area
incr
ease
d?
Rep
ort
of c
onse
rvat
ion
area
m
anag
emen
t ac
tiviti
es (
that
in
dica
te c
omm
unity
rep
rese
ntat
ion
and
part
icip
atio
n in
all
man
agem
ent
proc
esse
s, o
r co
mm
unity
par
ticip
atio
n in
im
plem
entin
g pr
ogra
ms
that
are
re
leva
nt t
o th
e co
mm
unity
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
63
Leve
l BLU
E: s
tage
4 –
con
serv
atio
n a
rea
man
aged
opt
imal
ly (
cont
inue
d)
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
15
. Soc
io-
econ
omic
&
cult
ura
l m
anag
emen
t
B64
Has
the
inci
denc
e of
bre
ache
s in
th
e co
nser
vatio
n ar
ea
decr
ease
d?
Patr
ol r
epor
ts c
onta
inin
g da
ta a
bout
ill
egal
and
env
ironm
enta
l unf
riend
ly
activ
ities
, and
the
num
ber
of
habi
tats
dam
aged
in t
he
cons
erva
tion
area
(tim
e se
ries
repo
rts)
, com
mun
ity p
atro
l rep
orts
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B65
Do
stak
ehol
ders
use
the
co
nser
vatio
n ar
ea a
s a
plac
e fo
r tr
aini
ng a
nd e
duca
tion?
Rep
orts
on
trai
ning
and
edu
catio
n in
the
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
B66
Do
tour
ism
act
iviti
es in
the
co
nser
vatio
n ar
ea p
rovi
de s
ocio
-ec
onom
ic b
enef
its t
o st
akeh
olde
rs, p
artic
ular
ly t
he
loca
l com
mun
ity?
Impa
ct a
naly
sis
of t
ouris
m
activ
ities
in t
he c
onse
rvat
ion
area
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
B67
Do
aqua
cultu
re a
ctiv
ities
in t
he
cons
erva
tion
area
pro
vide
soc
io-
econ
omic
ben
efits
to
stak
ehol
ders
, par
ticul
arly
the
lo
cal c
omm
unity
?
Impa
ct a
naly
sis
of a
quac
ultu
re
activ
ities
in t
he c
onse
rvat
ion
area
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
B68
Do
capt
ure
fishe
ries
activ
ities
in
the
cons
erva
tion
area
pro
vide
so
cio-
econ
omic
ben
efits
to
stak
ehol
ders
, par
ticul
arly
the
lo
cal c
omm
unity
?
Impa
ct a
naly
sis
of c
aptu
re
fishe
ries
in t
he c
onse
rvat
ion
area
. Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
Tota
l num
ber
of ‘Y
es’ a
nsw
ers
Perc
enta
ge
60 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
60Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
61
6164
Leve
l St
age
Gol
d 5:
Sel
f Su
stai
ning
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
ea
CR
ITER
IA
NO
. Q
UES
TIO
N
AN
SWER
V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
N T
OO
L R
EMA
RK
S
Yes
No
13
. In
stit
uti
onal
izat
ion
E69
Are
part
ners
hips
with
st
akeh
olde
rs p
rogr
essi
ng w
ell
and
havi
ng a
pos
itive
impa
ct?
Activ
ity a
nd m
onito
ring
repo
rts,
and
in
depe
nden
t stu
dy re
port
s th
at in
dica
te
a po
sitiv
e im
pact
from
par
tner
ship
s.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
16
. Im
prov
ing
co
mm
unit
y w
elfa
re
E70
Is m
anag
emen
t ha
ving
a
posi
tive
impa
ct o
n m
anag
emen
t pe
rfor
man
ce?
Inde
pend
ent
stud
y re
port
s th
at
indi
cate
man
agem
ent
activ
ities
hav
e a
posi
tive
impa
ct o
n th
e ar
ea’s
re
sour
ces,
and
on
soci
al a
nd
econ
omic
asp
ects
(in
clud
ing
man
agem
ent
orga
niza
tion)
.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
E71
Hav
e in
com
es (
purc
hasi
ng
pow
er)
incr
ease
d as
an
impa
ct
of m
anag
emen
t?
Surv
eilla
nce
repo
rts/
inde
pend
ent
eval
uatio
ns, s
tatis
tics
agen
cy d
ata.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
E72
Has
eco
nom
ic a
ctiv
ity in
cor
e se
ctor
s in
the
con
serv
atio
n ar
ea
(fis
herie
s/to
uris
m)
incr
ease
d?
Surv
eilla
nce
repo
rts/
inde
pend
ent
eval
uatio
ns, s
tatis
tics
agen
cy d
ata.
Se
lf-ex
plan
ator
y.
E73
Hav
e in
crea
sed
loca
l inc
omes
ra
ised
pub
lic a
war
enes
s of
the
ne
ed t
o su
ppor
t co
nser
vatio
n of
th
e ar
ea’s r
esou
rces
?
Surv
eilla
nce
repo
rts/
inde
pend
ent
eval
uatio
ns.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
17
. Su
stai
nabl
e fu
ndin
g
E74
Hav
e ac
tiviti
es c
arrie
d ou
t bee
n a
part
of a
sus
tain
able
fund
ing
syst
em th
at e
ngag
es s
take
hold
ers?
Activ
ity r
epor
ts a
nd f
inan
cial
re
port
s.
Self-
expl
anat
ory.
Tota
l num
ber
of ‘Y
es’ a
nsw
ers
Perc
enta
ge
REfERENCES
Carter, E., Soemodinoto, A. & White, A. (2011). Guide for Improving Marine Protected Area Management Effectiveness in Indonesia. Bali: The Nature Conservancy Indonesia Marine Program, xi + 49 pp.
Convention of Biological Diversity Conference of the Parties 10 Decision X/31 on Protected Areas (Nagoya, 18–29 October 2010), Point B. Issues that need greater attention, Article 3 (Management Effectiveness) and Article 5 (marine protected areas, MPAs). Available at http://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=12297.
Hockings, M., Stolton, S. & Dudley, N. (2000). Evaluating Effectiveness: A Framework for Assessing the Management of Protected Areas. Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge, UK: IUCN (The World Conservation Union), x + 121 pp.
Hockings, M., Stolton, S., Leverington, F., Dudley, N. & Courrau, J. (2006). Evaluating Effectiveness: A Framework for Assessing Management Effectiveness of Protected Areas, second edition. Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge, UK: IUCN (The World Conservation Union), xiv +105 pp.
Kapos, V., Balmford, A., Aveling, R., Bubb, P., Carey, P., Entwistle, A., Hopkins, J., Mulliken, T., Safford, R., Statterfield, A., Walpole, M. & Manica, A. (2008). Calibrating conservation: new tools for measuring success. Conservation Letters, 1: 155–164.
Kapos, V., Balmford, A., Aveling, R., Bubb, P., Carey, P., Entwistle, A., Hopkins, J., Mulliken, T., Safford, R., Stattersfield, A., Walpole, M. & Manica, A. (2009). Outcomes, not implementation, predict conservation success. Oryx, 43(3): 336–342.
Pomeroy, R.S., Parks, J.E. & Watson, L.M. (2004). How is Your MPA Doing? A Guidebook of Natural and Social Indicators for Evaluating Marine Protected Area Management Effectiveness. Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge, UK: IUCN (The World Conservation Union), xvi + 216 pp.
Staub, F. & Hatziolos, M.E. (2004). Score Card to Assess Progress in Achieving Management Effectiveness Goals for Marine Protected Areas. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 30 pp.
UNEP-WCMC (2008). National and Regional Networks of Marine Protected Areas: A Review of Progress. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.
White, A., Porfirio, A. & Meneses, A. (2006). Creating and Managing Marine Protected Areas in the Philippines. Cebu City, Philippines: Fisheries Improved Sustainable Harvest Project, Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation, Inc., and University of the Philippines Marine Science Institute, viii + 83 pp.
62 Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas (E-KKP3K)
62Te
chni
cal G
uide
lines
for E
valu
atin
g th
e M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Aqu
atic
, Coa
sts
and
Smal
l Isl
ands
Con
serv
atio
n Ar
eas
(E-K
KP3K
)
MINISTRY OF MARINE AFFAIRS AND FISHERIESDIRECTORATE GENERAL OF MARINE, COASTS AND SMALL ISLANDS
DIRECTORATE FOR CONSERVATION OF AREA AND FISH SPECIES
Jl. Medan Merdeka Timur No. 16, Gedung Mina Bahari III, Lt. 10, Jakarta Pusat 10110Telp/Fax : (021) 3522045
© 2012