decision making in wto era
TRANSCRIPT
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 1/67
Decision Making in WTO Era
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 2/67
WTO GENESIS
The General Agreement on Trade and Tariff (GATT) came
into existence in 1947
It sought substantial reduction in tariff and other barriers to
trade and to eliminate discriminatory treatment ininternational commerce.
India signatory to GATT 1947 along with twenty two other
countries
Eight rounds of negotiations had taken place during five
decades of its existence
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 3/67
Geneva Round 1947
Annecy Round 1949
Torquay Round 1951
Geneva Round 1956
Dhillon1960-61
Kennedy
1964-67
Tokyo
1973-79
UR
1986-93
•WTO establishment.
•Agriculture
•Textiles and Clothing•TRIPS
•Services
•Dispute Settlement body
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 4/67
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 5/67
1. Australia 13 Lebanon
2.
Belgium 14 Luxembourg 3. Brazil 15 The Netherlands
4. Burma (now Myanmar) 16 New Zealand
5. Canada 17 Norway
6.
Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) 18 Pakistan7. Chile, 19 Zimbabwe
8. China
9. Cuba 20 Syria
10.
Czechoslovakia 21 South Africa11. France 22 United Kingdom
12. India 23 United States
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 6/67
Observer Status
1. Afghanistan2. Algeria
3. Belarus
4. Bhutan
5. Bosnia
6. Ethipoia
7. Iran
8. Iraq
9. Kazakastan
10. Lao PDR11. Libya
12. Russian Federation13. Saudi Arabia
14. Serbia
15. Seychelles
16. Sudan
17. Tazakistan18. Tonga
19. Ukraine
20. Uzbekistan
21. Yemen
“Apart from Vatican, observer nations must start the process of becoming
members within five years of becoming observers.”
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 7/67
Application Working PartyEstablished
Number of Working PartyMeetings *
DraftWorkingPartyReport **
Afghanistan Nov 2004 Dec 2004
Algeria Jun 1987 Jun 1987 9 Jun 2006
Andorra Jul 1997 Oct 1997 1
Azerbaijan Jun 1997 Jul 1997 4
Bahamas May 2001 Jul 2001
Belarus Sep 1993 Oct 1993 7 Apr 2005
(FS) Bhutan Sep 1999 Oct 1999 3 Aug 2005 (FS)
Bosnia and Herzegovina May 1999 Jul 1999 2
Cape Verde Nov 1999 Jul 2000 3 Nov 2005
Ethiopia Jan 2003 Feb 2003
Iran Jul 1996 May 2005
Iraq Sep 2004 Dec 2004
Kazakhstan Jan 1996 Feb 1996 9 Sep 2006
Lao People's DemocraticRepublic
Jul 1997 Feb 1998 2
Lebanese Republic Jan 1999 Apr 1999 4 Dec 2005 (FS)
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Jun 2004 Jul 2004
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 8/67
WTO Objectives
WTO Came into existence for the purpose of :
Transparent, free and rule-based trading system
Provide common institutional framework for conduct of
trade relations among members
Facilitate the implementation, administration andoperation of Multilateral Trade Agreements
Rules and Procedures Governing Dispute Settlement
Trade Policy Review Mechanism
Concern for LDCs and NFIDCs
Concern on Non-trade issues such as Food Security,
environment, health, etc.
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 9/67
BASIC PRINCIPLES
1. NON-DISCRIMINATION
MFN (Most Favored Nation)
Members are bound to grant to the products of other
members treatment not less favorable than that
accorded to the products of any other country.
National Treatment
Once goods have cleared customs, imported goods mustbe treated no less favorably than the equivalent
domestically produced goods.
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 10/67
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 11/67
2. PREDICTABLE AND GROWING ACCESS TO THE MARKETS
Prohibition of Quantitative Restrictions
Binding of Tariffs
Bound Tariffs cannot be increased
Progressive reduction in the protection. Exceptions: Safeguards, BOP.
3. FAIR COMPETITION
4. TRANSPARENCY
5. ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 12/67
Annex 1-A: Agreement on Trade in Goods
1. Agreement on Agriculture
2. Agreement on SPS Measures
3. Agreement on Textiles & Clothing
4. Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade
5. Agreement on Trade related Investment Measures
6. Agreement on Pre Shipment Inspection
7. Agreement on Rules of Origin
8. Agreement on Import Licensing procedure
9. Agreement on SCM
10. Agreement on Safeguards
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 13/67
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 14/67
• WTO has defined services into 12 sector further divided into155 sectors.
1. Business (professional and computer)
2. Communication
3. Construction and Engineering services
4. Distribution services5. Educational services
6. Environmental services
7. Financial services
8. Health services
9. Tourism services
10. Recreational, cultural and sporting services11. Transport services.
12. Other services.
Service Sectors
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 15/67
Modes of Services
• GATS applies to four modes:
• (a) Cross border movement of service suppliers
• (b) Establishment of commercial presence in the
• country where service is provided.• (c) Temporary movement of natural persons to
• another country to provide services there.
• (d) Movement of consumers to the country of
•
importation.
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 16/67
Forms of IPR
Trademarks or Brands
Copyright
Trade Secrets
Patents
Designs
Geographical Indications
Plant Varieties
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 17/67
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 18/67
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 19/67
Developed Developing
Bands Reduction Bands Reduction
0-20 50%
Minimum avg
cut: 54%*
0-30 33.33%
Maximum avg cut:
less than 36%*
20-50 57% 30-80 38.00 %
50-75 64% 80-130 42.67 %
> 75 66-73% >130 44-48 %
Selection of Market on the basis ofTariff Reduction Schedule
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 20/67
Members will have the flexibility to Self-designate an Appropriate number of tariff lines asSpecial Products guided by indicators based onthe criteria of food security, livelihood securityand rural development. Product designated as SPswould be eligible for more flexible treatment, theexact nature of which would be decided duringthe on going negotiations.…….
Special Product: Hnkg declaration
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 21/67
10,000 tons
Import duty rates Tariff Rate Quota
4%
< 10,000 tons
400%
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 22/67
37 Countries who have TRQs
• Australia (2)
• Barbados (36)• Brazil (2)
• Bulgaria (73)
• Canada (21)
• Colombia (67)
• Costa Rica (27)
• Czech Republic (24)
• Ecuador (14)
• El Salvador (11)
• EU (87)
• Guatemala (22)
• Hungary (70)
• Iceland (90)
• Indonesia (2)
• Israel (12)
• Japan (20)
• Korea (67)
• Latvia (4)• Malaysia (19)
• Mexico (11)
• Morocco (16)
• New Zealand (3)
• Nicaragua (9)• Norway (232)
• Panama (19)• Philippines (14)
• Poland (109)
• Romania (12)
• Slovak Republic (24)• Slovenia (20)
• South Africa (53)
• Switzerland (28)
• Thailand (23)
• Tunisia (13)
• United States (54)
• Venezuela (61)
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 23/67
Tariff Escalation
Sl no. Country
Product Tariff (percent)
Product Tariff (percent)
1 EU Milk 113 Cheese 120
Grapes 18 Grape Juice 215
Apples 11 Apple Juice 63
2 Japan Milk 280 Yoghurt 370
Pineapple 17 Pineapple Juice 30
Grapes 12 Grape Juice 30
Apples 17 Apple Juice 34
3 USA Milk 66 Milk in powder 179
Cheese 133
Oranges 4 Orange Juice 31
Pineapple 3 Pineapple Juice 12
Grapes 1 Grape Juice 14
Basic Product Processed Product
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 24/67
Tariff Escalation
• Tariff escalation occurs when the tariff applied
on a product “chain” rises as goods undergofurther processing.
• This results in a higher effective protection forthe processing industry that otherwise would
be the case.
• In agricultural sector these levels will reach onan average 17% in EU, 27% in Japan and 9% in
US.
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 25/67
Special Agricultural Safeguard
•
Removal of Quantitative restrictions may result into sudden surge inimport causing injury to the domestic industry.
SSG allows imposition of additional tariff in case of :
• Volume Trigger : specified rapid surge in imports.Higher duty is appliedonly till the end of the specific year.
• Price Trigger : import price below specified reference price.Additionalduties can be imposed only on shipment concerned and on the products towhich tariffied rates apply.
• The right to make use of the SSG provision has been reserved by 38 WTOMembers, and for a limited number of products in each case. As many of
the developing countries did not tariffy, offering “ceiling bindings”instead, few of them have access to this provision.
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 26/67
WTO Members eligible to use the Special Agricultural Safeguard
Percenta e of a riculturaltariff lines covered b SSG*
Developed
Canada 10Czech 13EC (12) 31Hun ar 60
Iceland 40a an 12
Norwa 49Poland 66
Romania 7Slovak 13Switzerland 59
United States 9Developing
Colombia 27
Costa Rica 13El Salvador 10Mexico 29
Namibia 39
Phili ines 13South Africa 39
Swaziland 39
Thailand 11Venezuela 31
Member
Source: WTO document, G/AG/NG/S/9, 6 June 2000, Table 1.* Number of agricultural tariff lines covered by the SSG as a pro
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 27/67
Price elasticity of demand
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 28/67
any increase in the price, no matter how small,
will cause demand for the good to drop to zero.
changes in the price do not affect the
quantity demanded for the good.
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 29/67
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 30/67
• Amber Box:Must be reducedover time.
• Blue Box:Allowed for thetime being.
• Green Box:Allowed.
Domestic Support policies ….
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 31/67
Green Box Policies
•Research, including research in connection with environmental
programmes, and research programmes relating to particularproducts
•Extension and advisory services, including the provision ofmeans to facilitate the transfer of information and the results ofresearch to producers and consumers,
•Food security stocks (and targeted food security),•Disaster payments
Green Box policies are assumed to affect trade minimally, and
include support such as :
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 32/67
Blue Box Policies
Direct payments to farmers are exempt from thereduction commitments if:
•Such payments are decoupled
•such payments are based on fixed area and yield;or•such payments are made on 85 percent or less ofthe base level of production; or•livestock payments are made on a fixed number ofhead.
•These are called the „BLUE BOX‟ Subsidies.
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 33/67
Amber Box Policies
Total AMS has two components
• Product Specific AMS: Total level of support
provided for each basic agricultural product.
• Non Product Specific AMS: Total level of supportdirected at the agricultural sector as a whole.
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 34/67
• Market price support for a product = (administered price at the farm gate - fixedexternal reference price) x eligible production
– Where fixed external reference price = c.i.f. unit value for 1986-88
eligible production = quantity of production receiving the administered price.
• Product-specific AMS = sum of all positive support to a basic product (market price
support + other types of support not dependent on price gap)
• Product-specific AMS should be included in Total AMS only if it exceeds the de minimis level (5% for developed countries or 10% for developing countries), i.e. if (product-specific AMS/market value of total output of the product)
x 100 is greater than 5 (or 10 in the case of developing countries)
• Non-product-specific AMS = sum of all positive non-product specific AMS
• Non-product specific AMS should be included in Total AMS only if it exceeds the de minimis level (5% for developed countries or 10% for developing countries), i.e. if (non-product specific AMS/market value of total output of the
product) x 100 is greater than 5 or 10 respectively.
• Total AMS = (product-specific AMS exceeding de minimis + non-product specificAMS exceeding de minimis)
Calculation of AMS……..
C l l ti f th t t t l AMS
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 35/67
Calculation of the current total AMS
Member X (developed country), year Y
Wheat: • Intervention price for wheat = $255 per tonne • Fixed external reference price (world market
price) = $110 per tonne • Domestic production of wheat = 2,000,000 mt • Value of wheat production = $510,000,000 • Wheat AMS (AMS 1)• ($255–$110) x 2,000,000 tonnes =
$290,000,000 • (de minimis level=$25,500,000)
Barley• Deficiency payments for barley = $3,000,000 • Value of barley production = $100,000,000 •
Barley AMS (AMS 2) = $3,000,000 (de minimis level=$5,000,000)
Oilseeds:> Deficiency payments for oilseeds =$13,000,000
> Fertilizer subsidy = $1,000,000> Value of oilseeds production =
$250,000,000> Oilseeds AMS (AMS 3) = $14,000,000(de minimis level=$12,500,000)
Support not specific to products> Generally available interest rate subsidy = $
4,000,000Value of total agricultural production =
$860,000,000> Non-product-specific AMS (AMS 4) =
$4,000,000de minimis level=$43,000,000
Current total AMS (AMS 1 + AMS 3) =$304,000,000
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 36/67
%
20091947
?
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 37/67
Two Way Dilemma
How do you ensure that the country’s
consumers are being supplied
food safe to eat?
How can you ensure strict health &
safety regulations are not being used
as an excuse for protecting
domestic producers?
WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phyto Sanitary MeasuresTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phyto Sanitary Measures
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 38/67
SPS or TBT ?
human or animal health from
food-borne risks
human health from animal- or
plant-carried diseases
animals and plants from pests
or diseases
examples:
pesticide residues
food additives
human disease control
(unless it’s food safety)
nutritional claims
food packaging and quality
examples:
labelling (unless related
to food safety)
pesticide handling
seat belts
SPS Measures TBT Measures
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 39/67
No unjustifiable discrimination
– between Members with similar conditions
–
between own territory and other Members
Non-discrimination Article 2.3
SPS permits Members to impose different sanitary andphytosanitary requirements on food, animal or plantproducts sources from different countries, provided that
they "do not arbitrarily or unjustifiably discriminate between countries where identical or similar conditionsprevail".
E i l
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 40/67
Equivalence
Members shall
Accept SPS measures of other Members as equivalent
If the exporting country objectively demonstrates
that its measures achieve the same ALOP as the
importing country
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 41/67
Disease free areas Article 6
• Adaptation of SPS measures to regional conditions, including pest- ordisease- free areas, differing climatic conditions & different pest or diseases or
food safety conditions so as to lead to the development/imposition of differentSPS requirements
• Exporter to demonstrate (reasonable access to be given for inspection/testing)
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 42/67
TransparencyArticle 7 & Annex B
Members shallestablish an Enquiry Point
AND
designate a Notification Authority
notify other Members of new or changedSPS regulations when
no international standard existsOR
the new regulation is different than the
international standard
regulation may
have significant
effect on trade
AND
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 43/67
Transparency timeline
1. Drafting of the regulation
2. Publication of a notice
3. Notification to other Members
4. Draft text upon request (or website)
5. Receive & discuss comments
7. Adoption of the regulation
8. Publication of the regulation
. . . T
i m e . . .
9. Entry into force of the regulation Min.6 months
Min.60 days
6. End of comment period
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 44/67
Understanding Technical regulations
Incidence of product withdrawals
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 45/67
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 46/67
Rapid Alert Notifications from EU FOR Indian Products
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 47/67
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 48/67
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 49/67
Traceability Requirements
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 50/67
Strict Packaging requirement
b l
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 51/67
Strict Labeling Requirements
• A large amount of information has to be provided on the labelin both English & Chinese.
• The establishment number should be printed on the inner poly
liner, poly bag, or vacuum bag.• In the case of Alcohol & Pre-packaged food
– Labeling should be in Chinese.
– Specific font sizes have to be maintained.
•
In the case of milk & milk products – Labeling should be in Chinese.
– Specific background colors have also been mentioned.
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 52/67
Few examples….
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 53/67
Let’s see what Pakistan has to ask for?
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 54/67
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 55/67
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 56/67
EU Directive on packaging
and packaging waste 94/62/EC
• Volume and weight of the packaging shall be limited to the
minimum amount to maintain the necessary level of safety,
hygiene and acceptance for the packed product and for the
consumer.
•
Packaging shall be designed, produced and commercialised insuch a way as to permit its re-use or recovery, including recycling,
and to minimise the environmental impact when packaging waste
is disposed of.
• Packaging shall be manufactured in such a way that the presence
of noxious and other hazardous substances and materials isminimised with regard to the presence in emissions, ash or
leachate, when packaging is incinerated or landfilled.
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 57/67
Ecolabelling
Aim: – To provide consumers with a choice in buying products which
have been designed, produced and packaged, and which can be
disposed of at the end of their useful life, in an environmentally
sound way.
Criteria: – ecolabelling schemes are generally based on the Life Cycle
Assessment. The environmental impact of the product is assessed
throughout the entire life cycle of the product.
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 58/67
Food Miles
Food transported across the world burns up a
lot of fossil fuel and contributes to globalwarming→ consumers are becomingconscious and need to know nr. of milesfrom food to plate→ shorter shippingdistance becomes a competitive advantage
• www.organiclinker.com/food-miles.cfm (food mile calculator)
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 59/67
Fair Trade standard
Standard includes minimum requirements and progressiverequirements:
• Generic fair trade standards
– Social development chapter (incl. democracy, participation,
transparency) – Economic development chapter (incl. Fairtrade premium, export
ability, economic strengthening of the organisation)
– Environmental development chapter
– Standards on labour conditions (incl. Forced labour, child labour,freedom of association, occupational health and safety)
• Product specific standards – (e.g. varieties, quality grades)
• Trade standards
– (long term relationships, pre-financing, credit, pricing)
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 60/67
• Max Havelaar label operational in
14 European countries and 3
countries outside• Transfair label operational in
Austria, Germany, Italy, USA,
Canada, Japan
Different labels
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 61/67
Product safety
Manufactured products• CE Marking [compulsory to a range of
products and hazards, incl. e.g.
machinery, toys, protective wear,
electrical appliances, pressure vessels.Full list is mentioned under the New
Approach Directive] Indicates that the product conforms to the European
applicable and legal demands in terms of safety, health andconsumer protection
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 62/67
Product safety
CE marking• EU Directives (per product group) describe the essential
requirements (laid down in norms as defined by CEN,CENELEC or ETSI), which differ as per the safety riskinvolved
• From self-declaration by the manufacturer to testing andverification by testing institutes (notified bodies)
• http://www.newapproach.org/
– Product overview, directives with full legal texts andapplicable standards (EN norms)
– Safety of toys; Directive 88/378/EEC
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 63/67
Textile Labelling
• Directive 2008/121/EC
• All textile products must carry a labelwhich indicates the fibre content on theproduct
• A textile product consisting of two or morefibres must be marked + %
• Fibre marking in % order
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 64/67
Organic labeling
• Regulated through EU regulation2092/91 and 1788/2001
• To label a product as organic a
minimum of 95% of the ingredientshave to be produced by organicmethods
• Inspections of final product are notsufficient (inspections during
production process)• Conversion period of 2 year• Certification through accredited bodies
(e.g. Skal, IMO)
Tariff and Non Tariff barriers For Herbal
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 65/67
MFNrange NTM% NTM Description
Switzerland 0-0 50% Labelling requirement
Japan 0-10 8.60%
Product ch.requirement to protecthuman health
USA 0-6 60% Authorization to protect plant health
exports
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 66/67
Internet adresses
•www.eurep.org (EUREPGAP)
• www.globalgap.org (GLOBALGAP)
• www.brc.org.uk (BRC)
• www.codexalimentarius.net
• http://eur-lex.europa.eu (EU legislation)
• http://exporthelp.europa.eu (EU Export Helpdesk)• www.foodlaw.rdg.ac.uk/label (UK regulations guide)
• www.cbi.nl/accessguide
• www.sa-intl.org (Social Accountability International)
• www.iso.ch (International Standards Organisation
• www.flo-cert.net (FLO Fair Trade Label Certification)
• www.intracen.org/ep (ITC Packaging resource)
• http://ec.europa.eu/sanco_pesticides/public/index.cfm (Pesticide ResidueLevel Database)
7/28/2019 Decision Making in WTO Era
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-making-in-wto-era 67/67
Tamanna Chaturvedi
+91-11-26967558