decision making for results data teams des moines public schools august 1-2, 2011
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Decision Making for ResultsData Teams
Des Moines Public SchoolsAugust 1-2, 2011
![Page 2: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Blame it on Wisconsin!
![Page 3: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Blame it on Wisconsin!
• Monitoring ratio of mosquito bites to horsefly bites
• Daily naps justified as an “intervention”• Volunteering as a “meat and cheese
only” control group• Differentiated based on “readiness” for
2 daughters who wanted to kayak• Missed SMART goal of running at least
3 miles for five days straight.
![Page 4: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
If it’s all about “achievement”…
what do we mean?
WTL: Quick-write, whip-around, consensus
![Page 5: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Learning Targets
• I can select relevant data to track progress toward increased achievement
• I can interpret data to reveal strengths and targeted areas for growth
• I can relate the impact of adult actions to the learning of students
• I can actively participate to keep our learning moving forward
• ???
![Page 6: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Breaking News…
• …on monitoring and responding to data
"I don't see any community doing that well," said Gene Wilhoit, executive director of the Council of Chief State School Officers. "I am putting that back on the shoulders of teachers. This is a process of internal debate, conversation and thoughtful analysis and experimentation.”
July 26, DSM, Iowa Education Summit
![Page 7: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Decision Making for Results
![Page 8: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Principles ofDecision Making For Results
Antecedents
CollaborationAccountability
![Page 9: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Becoming Data Driven
How are you currently embracing a data-driven decision-making process that leads to results?
![Page 10: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Data DrivenDecisions
Results-Driven Schools
• Where is the proof?
• 90/90/90 Schools, Reeves 2003• Education Trust, 2002• NCREL, 2000• Consortium for Policy Research in
Education, 2000• EdSource, 2005• Northern Illinois University Center
for Governmental Studies, 2004
![Page 11: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Reflection
“The value of the data emerges only when analysis provides insights that direct decisions for students.”
White, 2005
![Page 12: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
DMR Building the Foundation
• Cause data and effect data• Continuous improvement cycle• Principles and processes of
Decision Making for Results: Data-Driven Decision Making
![Page 13: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
“Only by evaluating both causes and effects in a comprehensive accountability system can leaders, teachers, and policymakers understand the complexities of student achievement and the efficacy of teaching and leadership practices.”
Reeves, 2006
![Page 14: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Definitions and Examples
Effect data: Outcomes or results
Cause data: Professional practices that create specific effects or results
![Page 15: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The Leadership & Learning Center Matrix
Effects/Results (stud.out.)
LuckyHigh results, low understanding of antecedentsReplication of success unlikely
LeadingHigh results, high understanding of antecedentsReplication of success likely
Losing GroundLow results, low understanding of antecedentsReplication of failure likely
LearningLow results, high understanding of antecedentsReplication of mistakes unlikely
Antecedents/Cause Data (Adult Actions)
![Page 16: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Leadership and Learning Matrix
WTL: Matrix Writing Frame
• Think of a grade-level team or a department in the building where you last worked.
• Identify where on the matrix you think that team or department resides.
• Write down at least three justifications for why you placed them there.
• Justifications must connect cause and effect data
• Find someone else in the room that placed a team in a different quadrant and share your findings.
![Page 17: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Learning Targets
• I can select relevant data to track progress toward increased achievement
• I can interpret data to reveal strengths and targeted areas for growth
• I can relate the impact of adult actions to the learning of students
• I can actively participate to keep our learning moving forward
• ???
![Page 18: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The Process for Results
Analyze toPrioritize
Monitor & Evaluate Results
Treasure Hunt
SMART Goals
Specific Strategies
Results Indicators
Inquiry;Develop Questions
SIP
![Page 19: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Inquiry
“Data-driven decision making begins by asking fundamental questions.”
Doug Reeves
• What do you wonder about achievement in your building?
• What specific questions about teaching and learning can be derived from these greater “wonder-ments?”
WTL: Inquiry Writing Frame
![Page 20: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Step 1: Conduct a Treasure Hunt
• Why? To gather and organize data in order to gain insights about teaching and learning practices
• Considerations• Measures of data• Disaggregation • Triangulation • Reflection
![Page 21: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Can You Identify with This?
“It is not so much a lack of data, but an absence of analysis, and an even greater absence of actions driven by the data.”
White, 2005
![Page 22: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Step 2Analyze Data to Prioritize Needs
Analysis of 8th Grade School Data
Role-play
![Page 23: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Analyze Data to Prioritize Needs
• Why? To identify causes for celebration and to identify areas of concern
• Considerations
• Strengths• Needs• Behavior• Rationale
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
![Page 24: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Quality Prioritization
• Why? To take immediate action on the most urgent needs
• Quality prioritization requires a thorough understanding of:• Student population• Curriculum and Power/Priority Standards
(leverage, readiness)• Antecedents affecting student achievement• Quality of program implementation
White, 2005
![Page 25: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Step 3Establish SMART Goals
• Why? To identify our most critical goals for student achievement based on the challenges that were identified through the inquiry process
• Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Timely
![Page 26: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Step 4Select Specific Strategies
Let’s watch a leadership team as they enter this stage of the process…
![Page 27: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Select Specific Strategies
• Why?
• Adult actions will impact student achievement
• Strategies are—
• Action-oriented• Measurable/accountable• Specific• Research-based
• Considerations: Instructional, organizational, leadership, programmatic
![Page 28: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Research-Based Strategies
• Reeves, D.B. (2003. 90/90/90 schools. Retrieved from www.leadandlearn.com
• Reeves, D.B. (2006). Ten things high schools can do right now to improve student achievement. Retrieved from http://www.leadandlearn.com/resources/custom/Presentations/4.2.08.NY.NYC.pdf
• Learning 24/7 Observation Study (2005). What’s happening in schools? Or not?
![Page 29: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Additional Evidence in Support of Research-Based Strategies
• Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., & Hyde, A. (2005). Best practice. Portsmith, NH: Heinemann.
• Marzano, R. (2007). The art & science of teaching. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
• Barr, R., & Parrett, W.H. (2007). The kids left behind. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
• Marzano, R., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. (2005). School leadership that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
![Page 30: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Select Your Specific Strategies
1. Revisit your prioritized needs
2. Research the best possible strategies to meet the learner needs
3. Classify each type of strategy: Instructional, organizational, programmatic, and leadership
![Page 31: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Step 5Determine Results Indicators
Why? To monitor the degree of implementation and evaluate the effectiveness of the strategies
![Page 32: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Results Indicators
• Considerations
• Serve as an interim measurement
• Used to determine effective implementation of a strategy
• Used to determine if strategy is having the desired impact
• Help to determine midcourse corrections
![Page 33: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Results Indicator Application
1. Revisit strategies (Step 4)
2. Develop results indicators (“If --- Then” statements)
![Page 34: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
“Improvement cycles require leadership follow-up and relentless efforts to maintain the focus on data if decisions are truly going to be driven by informed data.”
White, 2005
![Page 35: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Step 6Monitor and Evaluate Results
Why? To engage in a continuous improvement cycle that—
• Identifies midcourse corrections where needed
• Adjusts strategies to assure fidelity of implementation
![Page 36: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Develop Your Monitoring Plan• Review your work from developing questions to
determining results indicators then determine how you will monitor the strategies. When you create your monitoring plan consider:
• Teacher or administrator teams• Monitoring cycles• Goals• Strategies• Impact on student and adult behavior• Ability to make midcourse corrections
![Page 37: Decision Making for Results Data Teams Des Moines Public Schools August 1-2, 2011](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042822/56649ede5503460f94bef228/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
…After all these words, statistical analyses, and graphs,…
What we do matters.”Reeves, 2006
WTL – Lunch Exit Slip (leave at your tables)Based on your strengths as a leader and new learning up to this
point, what positive contributions are you prepared to make to the School Improvement process in your building?