december 3, 2003 literacy organization (a non-profit, 501c-3) approved by the state of california tm...

26
December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

Upload: colleen-hunter

Post on 05-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

Literacy Organization(A non-profit, 501C-3)

Approved by the State of California

TM

Supplement Educational Services Provider

Page 2: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

Research Technology

Applying the Technology with Instruction

Academic Performance Index English Language Arts Test

Results

Discussion Topics

Page 3: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

tech-nol-o-gy (tek nal e je) n [Gr. tecnologia,systematic treatment: see TECHNIC & LOGY]

1. the science or study of the practical or applied science, etc.

2. a method or process etc. for handling a specific problem.

Technology

Page 4: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

Our scientific approach to English Language Development is based on Neurolinguistics

With our Neuro-imaging instruction process, we connect the sound-to-brain-to-written symbol link for instant recall later

Neurological Language Process

Page 5: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

Neurological

Page 6: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

MRI Brain Research

Study of How Language is Processed In the Brain

Language InstructionBased on This Research

Page 7: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

The Talking Page Literacy Organization

9

Neurolinguistic Language Process in the Brain

Page 8: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

Seeing HearingSayingWriting

Neuro-Imaging Brain Instruction Process

Page 9: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

…”The average child needs between 4 and 14 exposures to automatize the recognition of a new letter, letters or word in the brain”….

Dr. Reid Lyon, Chief of Child Development, National Institute of Child and Human Development (NICHD), 2000 Address to Congress

Scientific Research

Page 10: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

The Teacher on the SONO audio. Look at SONOgram™ # 10. Listen to the sounds this SONOgram™ makes, - . (1 exposure)

Say the sounds - . into the SONO Player. (2 exposures)

Hear your voice say the sound on the SONO Player. (3 exposures)

We are now going to form this letter sound using the clock as a writing guide. Start just below the dotted line at number 9 on the clock. Go straight across to number 3. Round up toward the top line toward number 12. Continue rounding toward the number 10. Round to number 8 touch the base line, round to number 4. Stop. (4 exposures)

Say with me, - . (5 exposures)

Now write a say and write SONOgram™ #10 , - four times. (9 exposures)

Applying the Technology with Instruction

Page 11: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

Myelin Insulation Vital for Memory

Page 12: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

Language Instruction Based on Brain Research & Neuro-

Process

After School

Programs

Familial

Page 13: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

New Neuro Method in Learning

Traditional Approach

New Approach

ClassroomCurriculumLong Learning ProcessTeacher-ledCostlyLimited Reach

Take Home Use at AnytimeSelf-Paced Approach9-Week Systematic Instruction SONO Audio System as the Teacher Cost EffectiveBroad Family Reach

Page 14: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

Approach Consistent with CARS

Neurological Familial Cultural Instructional1) Problem: Brain

Function/Process, not Brain Structure

2) Brain Metabolism: During reading tasks involving sounds of letters or words, there is a difference in good & poor readers

1) Reading Problems: Run in Families

2) Instructional Factors: More critical for children when there is a history of poor reading

1) Print Exposure, Parental Literacy and Lap-Time Reading are clearly important

1) Influence of Instructional Factors: Under- estimated

2) The Skills that lead to good reading must be taught explicitly for several yearsSource: Barbara Foorman, Jack Fletcher and David Francis

Center for Academic and Reading Skills (CARS)

Page 15: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

Familial

Page 16: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

To Quickly Assess the

Student’s Level of Oral and Written

Use of the English Language

Use the Linguistics Tree

Page 17: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

        

                                                  

Sentences and Grammar

(branches) 

Phrases

(trunk)

Words

Morphemes

Phonemes and Graphemes

 (roots)

TheLinguistics Tree

Page 18: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

Video

Page 19: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

Garfield ElementarySTAR Test Results*

Basic Level Goal 50%

ELA Score 2000

ELA Score 2001

Second Grade 6% 11%

Third Grade 6% 5%

Fourth Grade 11% 15%

Fifth Grade 11% 11%

School API NO NO

*99% are English Language Learners

Page 20: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

Basic Level Goal 50%

ELA Score 2002*

ELA Score 2003*

Second Grade 15% 32%*

Third Grade 18% 24%*

Fourth Grade 34%* 43%*

Fifth Grade 49%* 34%*

School Made API

No Yes

*The Talking PageTM English Linguistics Program Used in After School Programs

Garfield ElementarySTAR Test Results*

Page 21: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

Below Basic Students Tutored

API GoalsMet

ELA STAR ScoresIncrease

Page 22: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

ThirdGrade

ELA Score 2002

ELA Score Fourth Grade

2003

Far Below Basic 36% 12%

Below Basic 42% 37%

Basic 18% 43%

Proficient 5% 2%

Advanced 0% 0%

School API NO YES

Garfield ElementarySTAR ELA Test Results

Page 23: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

National Percentile Rank/CST

Performance Bands(NPR)

Weighting Factors

Far Below Basic 1-19th 200

Below Basic 20-39th 500

Basic 40-59th 700

Proficient 60-79th 875

Advanced 80-99th 1000

National Percentile Rank California Standards Test

Page 24: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

3rd Grade

Score 2002

4th Grade 2003

Far Below Basic 72.0 24.0

Below Basic 210.0 185.0

Basic 260.0 301.0

Proficient 220.0 175.0

Advanced 0 0

Indicator ScoreWeight Factor 48%Total Weight Score

628.0 X 48 301.44

685.0 X 48

328.80+8%

Garfield Elementary Weighted

NPR/CST ELA Test Results

Page 25: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

50,000 + wordsin the English language

2,000 words used in 90% of English speech

26 letters, 44 soundsphonemes & graphemes(110 sound and letter combinations heard in English speech)

70 ways to spell them 450 words used in

65% of adult writing

The English Language

Page 26: December 3, 2003 Literacy Organization (A non-profit, 501C-3) Approved by the State of California TM Supplement Educational Services Provider

December 3, 2003

The Talking Page™ Literacy Organization

Supplemental Education Services

Presented By:Martin J. Chekel, [email protected]

1738 Tradewinds LaneNewport Beach, CA 92660

(949) 650-8101www.talkingpage.org

Registered Offices