debriefing in simulation education – paul phrampus md, facep h
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Debriefing in Simulation Education –Using a Structured and Supported Model
Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP
h ’ llJohn O’Donnell CRNA, MSN
![Page 2: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Special PresentationSpecial Presentation
![Page 3: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Outline
• Welcome and intro to debriefing• Welcome and intro to debriefing
• Conduct a facilitated debriefing session
• Define key concepts in structured and supported debriefing
• Review debriefing pro’s, con’s and value
• Describe other debriefing methodsDescribe other debriefing methods
![Page 5: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Welcome: WISER and Debriefing• Diverse due to the number and variety of courses, instructors, participants, , p p– ~ 12,000 simulation encounters every year
– A broad spectrum of provider typesA broad spectrum of provider types• Nurses are the 2nd biggest user
– > 150 instructors
– All types of simulations• Ex: Roles and goals tool for debrief
DeVita, Schaefer et al. 2005)
![Page 6: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
I traveled ______ miles to attend the WISER SymposiumWISER Symposium
51%1. 0-102. 11-503. 51-1004 101 1000
9%
17% 17%
4. 101-10005. > 1000
9%6%
0-10
11-50
51-10
0
101-1
000
> 1000
![Page 7: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Debriefing is a waste of my time during a simulation courseduring a simulation course
97%
1. True
2. False
3%
True
False
![Page 8: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Debriefing is the single most important aspect to my simulation teachingaspect to my simulation teaching
76%
1. True
2. False
24%
True
False
![Page 9: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
I consider my skills in debriefing to be:
24%
28%
20%
25%1. Novice
2. Beginner 20%g
3. Advanced beginner
4%
beginner
4. Competent
Novic
eBeg
innerbeg
innerompete
nt
Expert
5. Expert
B A
dvanc
ed b
Com
![Page 10: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Common Threads
• We recognize the value of and need for gdebriefing with feedback to participants
• Debriefing should be learner‐centric and gconducted within a safe environment
• An accurate log should be created and usedg– Video, SimMan log, checklist
– Debriefing points are derived through setting appropriate session/ course objectives
![Page 11: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The Learning System Feedback Loop
• Objectives Drive the Processj
Objectives→ Course Material → Simulate → Debrief j
Prior to Course
During Course
![Page 12: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Stressed Excited
Activated
Crisis
Safe/ Effective Debriefing Crisis
Simulation
Debriefing
Area
Un‐pleasant Pleasant
Bored Relaxed
In‐activated
Morris, D. SimTec 2008
![Page 13: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
My Primary Role at Work is:My Primary Role at Work is:68%
1. Clinician2 Administrator2. Administrator3. Instructor
11%14%
0%7%4. Researcher
5 Student
Clin
ician
Administrat
or In
structo
rRes
earch
er
Student
5. Student
Ad
![Page 14: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Outline
• Welcome and intro to debriefing• Welcome and intro to debriefing
• Conduct a facilitated debriefing session
• Define key concepts in structured and supported debriefing
• Review debriefing pro’s, con’s and value
• Describe other debriefing methodsDescribe other debriefing methods
![Page 15: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Let’s debrief the event
• These are the main assessment areas1. ID problem2. Call for help3. CPR How should we start?
4. Airway5. Defibrillation5. Defibrillation6. Report to medics
![Page 16: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
GG
A
S
![Page 17: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Outline
• Welcome and intro to debriefing• Welcome and intro to debriefing
• Conduct a facilitated debriefing session
• Define key concepts in structured and supported debriefing
• Review debriefing pro’s, con’s and value
• Describe other debriefing methodsDescribe other debriefing methods
![Page 18: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Structured and Supported Debriefing
• WISER – AHA project: ACLS and PALS DebriefingWISER AHA project: ACLS and PALS Debriefing– John O’Donnell CRNA, MSN, SME
Bill Lee PhD AHA Executive Director– Bill Lee PhD, AHA Executive Director
– Dave Rodgers Chair, AHA Education Committee
J F h E i M di– Jan Farquhar, Enspire Media
![Page 19: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Structured and Supported Debriefing
• DefinitionA l i d i d d di– A learner‐centric process designed to standardize the instructor/student debriefing interaction to assist learners in thinking about what they didassist learners in thinking about what they did, how they did it, and how they can improve
• Structured elements include three specific debriefing p gphases with related goals, actions, and time estimates.
• Supported elements include both interpersonal support ll f t l l ith d b tas well as use of protocols, algorithms, and best
evidence to inform debriefing statements/questions.
![Page 20: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Debriefing Phases: the G.A.S. Method
![Page 21: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Outline
• Welcome and intro to debriefing• Welcome and intro to debriefing
• Conduct a facilitated debriefing session
• Define key concepts in structured and supported debriefing
• Review debriefing pro’s, con’s and value
• Describe other debriefing methodsDescribe other debriefing methods
![Page 22: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Debriefing Pro’s
1 Thoughtful discussion after the simulation is1. Thoughtful discussion after the simulation is important to allow the learner to sort out events, interpret what happened and whyinterpret what happened and why
2. Adults may learn better through self‐discovery and self analysis than by lectureand self‐analysis than by lecture.
3. Realizing that they will be called upon to work i h h i k l d dwith their knowledge, students may come to
class more prepared.
4. If they discover what they need to work on by themselves, then they are much more likely to
![Page 23: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Debriefing Cons
1 Slower than lecture = less efficient on the1. Slower than lecture = less efficient on the surface
2 Requires faculty training and orientation2. Requires faculty training and orientation
3. Not all material is suited to be simulated
4. Some trainees do not appreciate the scrutiny
![Page 24: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Value of DebriefingValue of Debriefing
• Review and reflection supports retentionReview and reflection supports retention– Problem: interrupts flow if done during a scenario– Hence, the value of a structured debriefing using an accurate, objective account of eventsaccurate, objective account of events
• Specific, individualized, evidence‐referenced f db kfeedback– Peripheral learning has been demonstrated to occur
• Participant perceptions and comments are used for course refinement and QI
![Page 25: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Outline
• Welcome and intro to debriefing• Welcome and intro to debriefing
• Conduct a facilitated debriefing session
• Define key concepts in structured and supported debriefing
• Review debriefing pro’s, con’s and value
• Describe other debriefing methodsDescribe other debriefing methods
![Page 26: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Other Types of DebriefingOther Types of Debriefing
![Page 27: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Plus‐ Delta
• Description:Description: – A student‐centric approach simulation debriefing using a 2 X 2 matrix Designed to rapidly gainusing a 2 X 2 matrix. Designed to rapidly gain participant feedback on both instructor and participant performance
![Page 28: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Debriefing With ‘Good Judgment’
Trainee ‘Frames’ Approach Frames to Actions to ResultsTrainee Frames Approach Frames to Actions to Results• A frame is the internal trainee
environmentk l d• Perceptions, knowledge,
assumptions, feelings, training etc….I l ‘ i i• Instructor role‐ ‘cognitive detective’
• Tries to figure out frames h h i ‘ fthrough using a ‘stance of curiosity’– Genuinely curious inquiry
Rudolph, J.W. et al., Debriefing with good judgment: combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry. Anesthesiol Clin 25 (2), 361‐376 (2007).
![Page 29: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Line Oriented Flight Training (LOFT) Debriefing: Military/NASADebriefing: Military/NASA
Line Oriented SimulationsLine Oriented Simulations
• Form of ‘after action’ debriefing
• Crew centered approach
• Uses crew resource h lmanagement heavily
• Highly structured
• Facilitation is stratified• Facilitation is stratified according to crew– High, medium and low
McDonnell, L.K., Jobe, K.K., & Dismukes, R.K. Facilitating LOS Debriefings:A Training Manual in NASA Technical Memorandum 112192 (Ames Research Center: North American Space Administration, 1997)
![Page 30: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
DiscussionDiscussion
![Page 31: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Outline
• Conduct a facilitated debriefing session
• Review the main purposes of debriefing following simulation experiencesfollowing simulation experiences
• Define key concepts in structured and t d d b i fisupported debriefing
• Describe other debriefing methodsg
![Page 32: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Faculty Objectives in Debriefingj• Provide a safe place for decompression
S i b bl fi d h– Serious but able to find humor– Use ‘Good Judgment’
• Stimulate reflection on performance• Provide prompt, objective and appropriate p p j pp p
feedback or redirection– Let participant discover what went right and wrongp p g g– Focus on the performance, not the performer
![Page 33: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Faculty Objectives in Debriefing• Reference real life experience
– What are the expected norms of behavior inWhat are the expected norms of behavior in clinical? (NORMALIZE)• What would you do in real life?y• Have you ever seen this?
• Acknowledge feelings (validates the experience)Acknowledge feelings (validates the experience)• Time out if needed (offer a ‘biologic’ break?)• Retreat to safer material come back later• Retreat to safer material- come back later• Provide other support as needed
![Page 34: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Debriefing Challengesg g• Occasionally participants
• Refuse to buy in• Refuse to buy in• Are unprofessional or hostile• Are open about their dislike for this p
form of learning• Consistently blame the simulator or
ifi i l i f h i fartificial setting for their performance• Claim X,Y,Z would never occur in real
lifelife
![Page 35: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Participant DemeanorParticipant Demeanor
• Joy RiderJ y– That was great!– Gets too jazzed up…
• Hostile or Defensive– Escalates– You tricked meYou tricked me
• Triggers distant or even recent trauma- defeated attitudetrauma defeated attitude
• Beats themselves up- Self critical or perfectionistcritical or perfectionist
![Page 36: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Other Debriefing Discussion Points
• What is your cycle of decision making: ADPIE Ce.g.- ADPIE-C
• Known errorsDi tr ti n– Distraction
– Fixation– Overconfidence/ attitudes
• EGO– WHAT is right is more important than WHO is right
• Hypervigilance or “simulatoritis”– Creating their own scenario
![Page 37: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Debriefing Skills
• Accurate recordAccurate record
• Be genuine‐ student centric
k l d d d i• Ask open not closed ended questions:– DON’T‐ Did you have a good experience?
– DO‐ Tell me about your experience
• Use pauses and silences to elicit feedback
![Page 38: Debriefing in Simulation Education – Paul Phrampus MD, FACEP h](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051522/5870cf331a28abb8548c0275/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Practice active listening.
• Be aware of your own views, feelings, and opinions.
F h k• Focus on the speaker
• Use non‐verbal communication: nod, smile, make eye contact, sit forward in your chair, or otherwise indicate that you areforward in your chair, or otherwise indicate that you are interested.
• Use verbal communication:– Interject with “uh‐huh,” “I see,” “go on”, etc… to indicate that you are
following what they are saying and to encourage them to say more.
– Restate what the person said or reflect part of what the speaker said as a question directed back to the crew in same or different words as a reflection on their comments.
– Expand on what the speaker said and then probe to ensure it is correct