debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

23
Give fluids! Dr David Inwald Consultant in PICU St Mary’s Hospital and CATS

Upload: meningitis-research-foundation

Post on 30-Nov-2014

1.196 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Dr David Inwald's presentation at Meningitis Research Foundation's 2013 conference, Meningitis and Septicaemia in Children and Adults

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Give fluids!

Dr David Inwald

Consultant in PICU

St Mary’s Hospital and CATS

Page 2: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Two pathophysiological reasons to give fluids in septic shock

• Fluid is in the wrong place

• The pump is not working

Page 3: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Increased capillary permeability

Page 4: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Sepsis

Warm shockHigh CO

vasodilation

Cold shockLow CO

vasoconstriction

Dysregulation of vascular tone

Page 5: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Depression of myocardial contractility

Page 6: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Shock

• A clinical syndrome of inadequate tissue perfusion

• DO2 < VO2

Page 7: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Increasing DO2

Page 8: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Therapeutic implications

GIVE FLUIDS

Page 9: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Frank-Starling curve

fluids

inotropes

Page 10: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

How much fluid?

Page 11: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Brierley J et al, Crit Care Med 2009; 37:666–688

Up to and over 60 ml/kg by

15 minutes

Page 12: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Early reversal of shockEarly reversal of shockEvery hour without resuscitation and Every hour without resuscitation and

restoration of CRT < 2 s and normal BP restoration of CRT < 2 s and normal BP increases mortality by 40%!increases mortality by 40%!

Han YY et al Pediatrics. 2003;112:793-9

1 Hour 2 Hours 3 hours

10987654321

Page 13: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Fluid resuscitation of hypovolemic shock: acute medicine's great triumph for

children

Carcillo JA and Tasker RC, ICM 2006;32:958-61

Page 14: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis
Page 15: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Time (h)

Mor

talit

y

Page 16: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

FEAST management

• C - Circulation

Page 17: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Developed world management

• A - Airway

• B - Breathing

• C - Circulation…

Page 18: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Other therapies?• Haemofiltration• ECMO• Modulators of coagulation

• rh-APC• Protein C• Protein S• AT III• r-tPA

• Anti-endotoxin strategies• Polymixin• Anti-endotoxin antibodies (HA-1A)• rBPI21

• Prostacyclin

Page 19: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Therapeutic implications

GIVE FLUIDS

Page 20: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis
Page 21: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis
Page 23: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

GIVE FLUIDS