de young may save slayer in iremoval his...

1
BRI\GI\G GOtD SOVEREIGNS The London. Paris and American bank is expecting a consignment con- sisting of 100.000 gold sovereigns from the 'banks of Australia on : the Austra- lian Mail line steamer Aeon which left Notice name and «Jgn«ture cf Dr. Siegert when con buy Angostura Bitten. Valuable «tomacWc A petition. -to ' have "the > Alexander brick and terra cotta : comparty, ;ad-' judged bankrupt. was filed yesterday UiT the United ;StatesVdistrlct court. The petitioners and -the amounts they; claim to be due them are:. The Lewis A. Hicks company, ; $14,503.85;- the. San Fran- cisco mill .and lumber company, $1,441.18, and ;M. , A; *. . Farnswor-th/ $567.5 i. ; Ralph Raphael.l a book : keeper residing In -San. Francisco,", filed a- pe-^ tltion in bankruptcy yesterday in * the United States district ? court. , His- lia-, billties were placed at $553," and he claimed to have no available asr**^ FILE BANKRUPTCY-PETITIOX ket streets, presumably because Baker was too slow in driving one of the union buses out of the way of a 'car. After his " ultimate dismissal on the charge- which was filed against him Young boasted that all of his blood \u25a0were gun men and fighters. -_ > Inspection of the police records shows that the two ' boys in custody were more than mere gun men. When they were 13 years old the register at ' the Mission station shows that . they were 'booked for disturbing the peace. Thomas v Young afterward . was arrested on a warrant charging malicious-misc- hief. Eighteen months ago the pair were arrested for breaking into a brew- ery, in "the 2 Mission*.' and committing petty larceny. Yesterday they were fully identified by. the crews^of the two cars who were 'held up Tuesday morn- Ing by masked men at. Powell and Bay streets as the ,men \u25a0 behind the masks. IDENTIFIED* AS THUGS Both boys will be; taken from detinue' and charged, with, niurder^ today. An attempt will be, made" to show that Thomas did; the killing. James Twill be named .as. an /accessory for .having given his brother the revolver that' was used. _| .;-. \u0084 ,\u25a0.-.., ;.: : •_>-.'\u25a0'\u25a0-' \u25a0 A'heartbroken- mother, *-74 ; years old, probably -will follow:. Hems: quickly to the grave. The v death- : of ;hervson has prostrated her. ;'. -Acquaintances-- say that - more' -than; [a.-, 'usual * attachment existed between', the ; two" and hen son practically: lived;to make her life easier in its declining, years.' " '.. - . . Hems had ibeenf o/i , the rPaciflc ' street beat only -eight Jdays, -'-having f been transferred from '\u25a0 the Chinatown/! squad to fill a~ vacancy, made by"a." police-offi- cer on ; vacation.- He was appointed/Uq the Torce September 4,".1896, and- during his 12 yearsof -police duty r served: with an absolutely; .-perfect record. : .';".'; '. . Arrangements lor. the -funeral .were. completed; yesterday. -\ Company^ A i of the police* department,; of ' which Hems w;as a member, .will ? escort -' his ? body from the home ;of his* .tho thereat ,2312 Larkln street to.St.^ Bridget's ichurch and thence 'to the.' grave.'. A' detall.'of 24 men . jtrom)each. -.0f,-;thel other %slx companies will- assist. Pall ,;\u25a0• bearers have, not yet been chosen.' Various^sb-* cial and .'athletic clubs- of ~> which -^the' dead . officer , was ', a .member probably will' be represented. ,/ , . .; . : A- pitiful incident, was talked 'about the police; headquarters yesterday. "On the I afternoon ; of his-! death \u25a0 Hems, ;be- fore Chief Biggy, .was commended as an efficient 'and- dutiful officer.- -\u25a0'\u25a0-It :- was v he who'arreste^J the son, of Admiral; Evans three 'days ago Ina dance hall- row', "on the coast .and. the ; identity, of \ his \ pris- oner when;- it, became known to>i the policeman, set "him .to thinking' that perhaps ; he j had ' done * wrong! %Taking this matter '; to . his "chief., Hems'; was commended "instead, of tbeing censured.' PAYS TRIBUTE: TO 'HEIXS?^ Vx Ina letter \u25a0; sent : yesterday by .'; Chief Biggy to the police commission", -Hems was paid a sincere- tributeVby ;his'su- , perior.rß.lggy, mentioned VHeins'.' spot- less record and- cited" ' examples ; of bravery that the officer had : ; displayed on -'past; occasions.- '"One*»of .«-the bravest, most efficient" and reliable of- ficers in the. department," were \ the terms in which. Biggyyreferred r tor Hems. Official- notification, to the com- mission by Biggy* of Hems" death was the occasion of the. letter. A rpmarkable case, rendered so by the striking likeness between twin brothers, confronts the. police in their offorts to fasten the guilt for the death of Policeman William H. Hems, who ivaa shot down In cold blood in a row on crime stained Barbary coast yester- day morning and who died a few min- ute? later while being rushed to a hos- pital. Thomas O. and James Young, twin brothers. IT years old. are held for the crime. James Young has down and in a confession has charged the murder to his brother. Thomas Young declares his innocence and says that liis brother's ttatement is false, that he is the innocent twin and that the shot v.-as fired by James. To strengthen Thomas" statement, the re- volver with which witnesses say Hems v.-as kiiled was in James Young's pos- session when he was arrested. A dozen witnesses, however, have identified Thomas Young as the murderer. In each case the identification was made by the difference in the clothing ;tjie brothers wore, it being almost impos- sible to tell them apart by their fea- tures. ISACH ACCUSES OTHER Standing face to face in a corridor of the city prison the twins passed the lie to each other yesterday morning, and James Young pronounced the words that beyond doubt will send his brotheY to the gallows: <V v "That is my twin brother. I saw him shoot the policeman as the policeman leaned over to pick him up." This statement was made further to cement the evidence contained in a confession which he had already made. When Thomas Young heard his brother turn against him he raised his hand above his head, blazed fiercely at his twin and Ehouted: '"I deny it. You He; it was you that fired the shots." The brothers were led back to their separate cells. Later they were taken in charge by Identification Detective Sergeant Ed Gibson to be photo- graphed. Their pictures, counterparts (except where Thomas Young's bruised and puffed lips protrude), were laV csed numbers 15*214 and 19215. In filing them away Sergeant Gibson discovered the photograph of an older brother, Charles A. Young, who served a two year term In San Quentin for burglary committed in Amador county. A pic- ture of any one of the three might pass for all, so remarkable is the (ur.siiy resemblance. Precedent has shown that it is al- most impossible to secure a first de- gree conviction for the murder of a policeman, but in the present case the police believe that, despite the conflict that may arise in establishing identi- ties of twins who are as alike as peas In v pod, their case is complete. KEUIKS OX LIKENESS Thomas Young declared lightly yes- terday that he would be cleared. "Who can say positively whether it was 1 or my brother who fired the shot?" he asked. "I admit doing the shooting in the saloon, but my pistol was taken from me in there. Who had the pistol that killed the policeman? The man who had it must have fired the shot and that man was my brother." Thomas Young's attitude has worried tlie police, but they maintain that their case has not a single weak link. Crowded Barbary coast, peopled with men accustomed to crime in all its phases, accustomed nightly to seeing and mingling in brawls, witnessed the cold blooded shooting, and so many eye witnesses have volunteered testimony that only those whose versions were the clearest have been accepted by De- tectives Wren, 'Riordan and McMahon, who have been detailed on the case. Four sailors. J. J. Bowrassa, James Wexler and J. J. Cadott from the Kan- sas and George H. Bowman from the Minnesota, together with Emil Van- nucci, bar tender in the O. K. saloon^ where the trouble first started, Robert Pacheco, a waiter in the same place, and Michael Maloof, a customer who tiocd at thi end of the bar, have been eubpenaed to tell of the initial trouble In which Thomas Young attempted to shoot Pacheco in an argument over the payment for some beer he, his b/otlier . and the sailors had Just drunk. But for the alertness of a nameless dance hall girl Pacheco would have been killed. Young's revolver being knocked down by her hand as ho flr«d at the waiter. The bullet set fire to Young's trousers leg, through which it passed, and the burned garment will esEist the case of the prosecution, as witnesses on the outside agree that the man whose clothes were afire killed Hems. TWO MEX OFXEBVE - Following the killing of Hems, the Young brothers fled eastward to Mont- gomery street and along Montgomery street to Jackson, where they parted, Thomas diving into a vacant lot at the northweft corner and James continuing io a saloon at Jackson and Kearny Ftreets. Joseph Branchl, who lives at the Montana house in Pacific street, and F. H- Van Syele, a Morse patrol- man, were the only ones with nerve enough to follow the murderers after Hems was shot. The two, running side by side a few paces behind the fleeing brothers, agreed each to take a man. Van Sycle chose Thomas Young and Branch! selected James. Branch! followed James Young into the saloon, saw him attempt to hide the weapon which he said his brother handed to him after shooting Hems, and grappled with him just as Police- man John Rocca and John Fullalove, a second Morse patrolman, burst in the door, having seen the two men enter. When TUomas Young attempted to hide in the darkness of the vacant lot Van Sycle drew his revolver and mount- ed guard on the corner, waiting for assistance. The fugitive could not be found at first when other police officers arrived to begin a search, and when James Young was arrested in the sa- loon all but two of the policemen, not understanding that there had been two men involved, gave up the hunt. ' POLICEMEN GET LAXTKRXS Policemen Jack Evatt and J. C. O'Connor, Impressed by Van Sycle' s earnestness in declaring that tbe real murderer was still in the lot, remained on guard. Van Sycle procured lanterns and the three finally found Thomas Young where he had crawled under- neath a section of the caved In side- walk. A red necktie which will be of importance in distinguishing Thomas from James had been torn off by the hiding man, but was also found by the vigilant policemen. Captain Duke of the central station yesterday -drafted a letter to Van Sycle commending him for his good work and thanking him on behalf of the police department for his part in capturing the accepted mur- 1 dlerer. Th<? Young twins both served the United Railroads 'as strike-breakers during the recent . trouble.^ Their father,' Beauregard Young, is- an ,in : epector, for -the company. During the strike disturbances 'the father shot W. 11. Baker, a striker, at Third and Mar- » Police Confronted With Difficul- ty of Proving Which of Them Killed Policeman LIKENESS OF TWINS MAY SAVE SLAYER Poiiceman William H. Hems, slain on Barbary Coast,* and Thomas 9. Young (left) 'and; James': Young,/ twin; brothers, one of whom killed the patrolman ; also a diagram showing i the route taken, by the brothers and the' places /.where they were DE YOUNG PLEADS IRRESPONSIBILITY In Burns Libel Case, v Chronicle EditorsjDehy His Control of Paper's Policy ) '". .;Ii lUe , ; . "ttle; .actual progress \u25a0-\u25a0 was ra ade yesterday in * Pol ice : Jud ge "( Ca-* baniss'. court 'in the"' preliminary, ex-" amination 'of i the criminal .libel charge brought^ b yj ; Special Agent William «J: Burns! against 1^ M.:H.-de Young, alleged editor ; and | proprietor of the San Fran- cisco t Chronicle;?: enough : developed r to give; Promise ithat : the case will, bring out more matter of public Interest than at : first" seemed Jikely.','.' \u25a0 '- '\u25a0...".'• John, P. Young?and liuberf E. Hunt, respectively managing editor and : city editor of i the Chroniclei- were the i only witnesses \u25a0examined.." ., The burden ;of :their testimony was of 'a -somewhat surprlsing-nature, .being directly, to the effect ..that M. ; H..jde ;;, Young, generally supposed- to- be .sole -and .supreme :;in control fat the/ paper's destiny, \ has .lit- I tie more :to do : with It's actual manage- j ment than its office boy. : If .'the ' testimony;' of : his 'two "'/env l ployes; may beVbelieved, iDe .Young' is | neither 'the proprietor nor the editor of.: the . Chronicle,^ does not .direct ; its policy in any:. way, is" not even con- sulted by 'employes 'of the -paper cerning questions of policy and ; never interferes .with the judgment of those who* say .they -do shape its devious course."- Not 15 e; Young, /but the San Francisco Chronicle publishing com- pany, a Nevada' corporation, is the pro- prietor."of ;>the" paper, and; Managing Editor . John : P. Young is in absolute control "of its" editorial and" news col- umns. "Young .himself testified that the only restraint he felt was that he might hesitate: to adopt -such a: sweep- Ing Innovation as a change of party politics for/the paper without consulta- tion. ; ;,* \u0084::\u25a0. "-;; h/l<y \u25a0 '...-. _.: : XEVER COXSUt,TS DE YOUNG De Young was not v in court |to face~ Burns' charge of criminal libel in per- son,: but : was represented by Attorneys Hiram "W. Johnson,; Reuben- H. : Lloyd and 'D. M. Duffey,. the former taking the most active-part in conducting: the defense. Young was the first ; witness called. He lost no time. in acknowledg- ing himself as editor of the paper,"as- sighing to M. H.de Young, the. official position of "financial' manager.' Young stated, however, that he was .not * a member- of. the board of directors of the Nevada corporation and was un- familiar with its personnel. Asked from whom he received .j instructions . con- cerning the policy r or \ management of the. paper Young, responded: "I don't receive instructions. I prac- tically-run'-the concern. : I- 'don't y.re- ceive instructions from or consult with anybody." \u25a0 """* < "Didn't you ever, consult with Mr. de Young as to the policy to be pursued in relation to the graft prosecution?" questioned \Heney In a,tone of surprise. '.'Never." was the answer given after a number of objections ; .to;the questloa had been advanced;by the defendant's counsel and disposed " of. Attorney Lloyd spent some time developing the theory that unless a defendant in such a case was proved to be either the editor or the "of the paper or else the author of the alleged libelous article he could not be held for libel, and then proceeded to insist that De Young had already been shown to be neither, the editor, nor proprietor. •_; "Proprietorship/ and '. editorship)' are matters /of fact and , not of name,"-: an- swered Heney. .'"We /propose: to .show that this Nevada' corporation. is merely a dummy affair, organized for' the pur- pose; of: evading legal liability,"^and to prove that De Young is,* In \ fact; what everybody., . In San Francisco -believes him be "' There was -an "expectant hush." as -Heney paused; *but he con- tinue'd,:*'^—both" owner and editor of the Chronicle." ' '/ ; ,' | CAN'T ' LESSEN" ; RESPOXSIBILITY , "Dummy agencies," « Heney .added, "cannot lessen 'his responsibility.'! .; ; - Managing Editor \ Young said that the alleged libelous article accompany- ing, the Snell affidavit in last Saturdays Issue'-of the paper was written by a-re- porter,/Stuart Masters,;" and that 1 * he himself :haa not seen'it until after pub- lication, although "he had "been con- sulted about it ; by City Editor.Hunt.be- fore I[t . was written. & De - Young, | he said, was i at his- San; Rafael^ home- at the time and knew .nothing; about the article.- ''\u25a0: /, ' \:.'-~l~',[ :. - : .]. ,_ .• - Heney asked Young If De Young, had not; told him /at /one time 'or another to publish' all hetcould'agairist: the prose- cution, .and received the .answer: : "On the contrary, 'lie, has frequently; depre- cated whatvwe -have' done." r - "Idon't' wonder," commented' Heney. . Heney /concluded" Young's examina- tion by asking if ; the witness did not remember two v'occaslohs /oh which : : he had discussed the policy, of | the Chron- icle: with De Young'in'the presence ol Rudolph; Spreckels and : Heney' himself. Young remembered ;: the . instances % re- ferred }to, but : his . recollection -of -what was said was vague v. and. uncertain. The S first s occasion ' referred' ; to '- wag at the : time : of i the I beginning'; of \u25a0 the graft prosecution, when",Heney- and Spreckels called upon Young, to/ learn* whatpollcy the ' Chronicle ;. would'v pursue, ' and, ) ac- cording to' Heney,\ were /told by; Young that j. he would C have Si to/ '/'consult De Young before ;: determining Fthls - policy. Young 'admitted ./visiting '.Heney/at' the" latter's' office "company, withVcity Editor , Hunt ; at , a / later : date, 1 but ; did not!/ remember .having^ toldjHeney - arid Spreckels then that De .Young : had 'com- plained 1 about "the"policy of , the i paper and'.told'hlm^to :beZmore , favorable -to the'.prosecutlon."' .\u25a0"\u25a0'.*'\u25a0:" ' : . ''"\u25a0-\u25a0',". v'^iji : : :.vWe /went'/to -you' then /to tell you that ; you were fhot ', treatihg;us fas \u25a0 fairly, about" giving^ out*. news; as : ; you* were treating _the -/other, -,/piapers,"- /declared Young.- _ .•'. . \u25a0\u25a0:' ..;\u25a0 \ :-;J v -\u25a0. .\u25a0: ; fi "Yes, 1 .: / re_tpr te^Heney, ; "and i didn't' i COURT IS ASKED TO REVERSE DECISION Lawyers Seek to Change the Ruling on Legislature's Special Holidays, r . When is a" holiday, not .a, holiday? The supreme <ourt of ' the state has already answered 'this question, - but the disciples .of. Blackstone : are still pegging -away at a. problem: .which the lay 'mind has long ago -given? up as hopeless, and in - a petition .filed . yes- terday the learned justices are asked to guess again.' ' ', '/ -The. supreme court, decided May 15 that the*act creating .the special holi- days -declared by the governor -during the f late'- financial crisis* was r clearly class legislation /and/ -consequently void." - The ' fj-iehds of ;l the ' court, ;as they -are -styled 'in. -yesterday's, peti- tion, feel . that : the j statets* moat I august tribunal.lwks ; wrong, =- and L ay. rehearing of/ the' original, "case: isiasked." ' C ' iZ The . original' petitioner i was 'j M. H." IMepenbrock 'and the court •of Sacramento f county*,; was '^tKe*! respond-" ent. .Yestefday's'petitJon'T.was .filed by! Cushihg, Grant ?& Ciishing '.' as friends bfr'.'the: court,- \ .:.;.,... . . \u25a0 \u25ba . The petition maintains that -thou- sands ;of ' the t debtor f class will ' be \in-'\in- jured_- If -the, .present r"declsion Vis .al- lowed j to ; stand, -while ; only:a j compara- tively : few of i the^'credltor^class^will be] injured* if I the •: holidays'; are', \u25a0de- clared .'legal.' ' The , :: petitioners* .'argue that the ; act "..was ! not »class) legislation," as the: effect » to i> both j the; creditortand debtor 'classes; wpuldlh'ave. been"equal-*i ly 'disastrous -if. the" demands '."of, depos-" ito'rs ;on" the" banks vhad. been, enforced by^the^courts 'at Uhe " tltheifof the : panic; " The petitioning i.;; .attorneys *>V submit that ' they .\u25a0.•',.are ':\u25a0 -\u0084 representing who, relying';on'»the ' t act'-"cre"ating"the holidays/i entered: . Into ','(\u25a0\u25a0 b]»siness '. ar- rangejnents^^wblch^wlilt3"ca.usej;tHem great \u25a0 loss 4 if the' legality; of^the'-legls-; lation »• is, 'not f t sustained.;";,^Banks'; and other' cre'ditors' are* now,;subject ; to loss if * they,; 'failed - to; protest 1}notes v when they fell; due';i On-the'other/hand.'Jt Is argued that- It fis ipow ,'ot ' t no" ? practical moment to' any. foneTas - r to"}what«.busl^ nesss a 'court-* couia transact: dry; the legal > holidays. - This \ last' point ; was . the gist* of * the ;decision r ,in^which ,. the ; holi-' days i were declared flip'sholidays at all; as It : ; was -decided-? 'in' { ilt?.that vthe? su- perior \ court' of \u25a0':< Sacramento] county; had the right to^try.Janf action for : ;the"cnr; forcement"of UheJ payment jot ran -obli- gation •: during i;the holidays.';! \u25a0 The i chiefs argument.; of\ the '.petition' fs'. that/, the'; 'question! fdecided.^by §the court was « and that the .^purely academicrside-*of ,Uhe 'problems should not be allowed: to \theKclear intentions of the 'legislators,*"!; who passed". the^ act . for the. relief of ' thY whole; state.; 7 ;.' \u25a0\u25a0 : \\" y .\z . ; THE SAN^RAN(JIB(JO^CAIiL-^m Gray and bleached hairrestored to any natural .color.byj the Hatestvpreparation.- S..:Strozynski?Co.;sl24B sSutter|street:i^ tell you I'd keep on holding out as long as your, paper continued to He about the . proseoution?" ' J The question went unanswered, and, with the answer" ; to; the -former ques- tion,'was stricken from .the record:, _ , City Editor Hunt's ( testimony - was much like \ tha't>';of " Managing Editor :Ybung. He declared that 'he took.or- ,ders from .Young- alone"; arid had never been * given, instructions^ by De Young as to the general' hews- policy of the paper. He searched: his memory and decldedt that De Young might have given J»im minor news Items: once or twicef^ut beyond that he had never in- terfered. Hunt V.was also hazy about the meetings with Heney and Spreck- elsV* and qualified his . statements as be- ing only "to the best of his recollec T tion." ' : .. w ''\u25a0 - -' HENEY CALLS FOR BOOKS rf: Heney called the secretary-treasurer "of. the San '-; Francisco Chronicle -pub- lishing company ;to the stand , with the intention of examining: the; stock books of the corporation in an effort to^ prove that Del Young £ is editor; and \ proprietor of the Ciironicle'in.fact, if not in name, but the | Introduction of this line of tes-: ttmony was ' strenuously ; objected to . by Hiram '"W.. Johnson.;? During; the argu- ment -that 'ensued Judge Cabaniss | took a part in the discussion, saying; at.one time: ; "Isuppose, that-even KMr.de Young owned 1 all the stock of . the cor- poration": 1 1 ' Is that, with mar- ,velous r modesty and self-abnegation,* he might; forego ' the jcontrol of the paper and [ place ' it f all ; in' Mr/i Young's hands. Siich a course- would 1 ordinarily seem rather unusual, but -some, men may be constituted upon -that -peculiar line." : *,vAn adjournment .was taken until Monday iaf terno"on;: at 1 2 o'clock; :when argument' on ;" the jadmission ;of :testi- mony>.willibeiicontinued. : . Members j; of De.Young's counsel; suggested to Heney after adjournment; that ihei should miss the 'case 1 against^'De Young,\ and. if i he still wished: to| pursue the ; matter, bring, charges against Managing Editor .Young.,? Heney. fell-in" thoroughly,^with the' latter> part of^the; suggestion,- de- claring <that^ he >wbuld. follow ;it to- the letter, -jbutrinslstingi, that; he'; would at the same 'time )fight 1 the ; De -Young case to'a-flhlsh^. : .' "V \u25a0;"'.: . '.\u25a0'.'-:\u25a0 Byron Hot .Springs For your..week end rest. 7-Two and one- hdlf \ hours'- 4 , easy, : ride from. San 1 * Fran- cisco on r the' line *of ithe- Southern Pa- cific. :.. '."\u25a0 ;..•';• -i Sydney. Australia, the early part of last month. The sold sovereigns are equal to about 1456.400. and upon the receipt of the coins they will be taken to the United States mint here and be reminted into American twenty-dollar gold pieces. . . . 16 Are you getting on your ; -money?. ; r Ocean. Shore; Railway^^ are : ,being x soldi direct vto they public ifa^^S^fpr-cashror;^^ - V. Thesejtjorids are secured : byj aj first; m'qrtgage'of ' $5,000*000 : onHhe^entire; assets of the •; company; amounting to* i over $9,000,000.; ;6cean^ Shore 1 BondsJ; are r not asseXsable?andfriet' ; myestors s.43) per^cent} interest?" :.. v/.TheVstock'-'' holders i of - the;rOcean; Shbre^ have invested over: $3,ooo,ooo]pf^theirown inoneynih^tHisjemerprise. ' : Write^for^Oc^ilSHbrei>Breezes, an illustrated? magazine .aboutthe railway— sent "free: , \ .. < ; Ocean Shore Railw^ Go. : 58 Eleventh St., San Francisco : ForjlnfiEuita and CMlcbrei . : The Kind Have Always Bought Bears the y^lji^ //&/> .- /i \u25a0*. Two Money Today and tomorrow—Friday and Saturday mark the 'close of our ANNUAL SPRING PIANO CLEARANCE and of your opportunity to buy a high : gfade, -artistic piano at a price 1201 20 to 25 per cent below actual values. This sale is 1 a success ;because;it -is bonafide- and the re- ductions are money discounts, on. actual bed-rock valuations, not on fictitious prices arranged to suit the occasion, as is .customary with some dealers. The pianos offered are the best \u25a0'", argument of the genuineness of the , opportunity. New, beau- i rtjful instruments' of full size, jn finest finished cases as low as $1 56.00. 'y Others at $1 80, wliich ought to . bring $250. For \ $230^00, ;^42.od?and up t05267.00 we are selling pianos that \u25a0elsewhere are held at-*. $400.00 ! and upwards. At prices less than $300.00 we show beautiful high grade instruments of the most reputable factories in the land which in most stores are : priced .; at .from $450.00 to $600.00. These are piano values of .the highest type :and surely merit your consideration. : Big payments are; not necessary on the smaller priced in- struments^We/wiil accept as low : as $6.00 monthly, $7.50^' $B^oo and . slo.oo; for the more expensive styles. All bear ithe < unqualified guarantee of our house— the guarantee that makes good. AlL r are,tuned and cared. for free for one year and your* \u25a0 satisfaction in-the . smallest detail is assured. , Two days more— two days of money saving opportunity ; which/ properly taken advantage of, means happiness in the :.hdme, the ownership of a;Veally. good "piano and a substantial \ saving jn- the buying. Come in.. "-r~ \u25a0 y - 510 Twelfth St. 1220-24 Van Ness Ay. - Other ; Stores— Los Angeles, Sari .> Diego, Sacramento, San \u25a0 : - \u25a0- ' joicEtc . ; ; , I Removal Sale MXiP^illU Wp n,, Ye , I S vVe have the good* Af"si»i*'^ rt ;t*-» *-- ft. rtfv* ~~~ t^ \u25a0 ur \>n ny 1 MnzX'Meilns & (fa hich pfoves the reco g - II I! WC tdL the tTUth cIXXS X V t niiion^of Merit. Value g I | gloikiera | ° nd Qualitv ' : ' 1 I The First Sale We Ever Held I 9 \u0084 ••:./:•; .,- . THE LARGEST CROWD of Satisfied and Sur- H pi *\u25a0 - prised, good natured buyers ever assembled under, one roof ' W} | No Nonsense About This Sale I Xasive never have anticipated sales) i|] I The Choice of the House I m : : :' ANY SUIT OR: OVERCOAT O /~\ (If) M W*W^" that formcrltfsbld fromj£4o to $70 ' : 3 \ #^ ==== ri I Celebrated Paragon Trousers 1 m t - \u25a0 \u25a0 - ' ••'\u25a0\u25a0\u25a0\u25a0\u25a0\u25a0\u25a0 \u25a0 "-- ' •~ ; MHRB Til -! , (PARACON ' TROUSFRS ARF ART\ ' I*3 M : •\u25a0"\u25a0\u25a0-\u25a0.'\u25a0 ;\u25a0\u25a0:• '-'}._ "-- . ' The price revision I The price revision i*^| I \% JROUSERS\: '"/\u25a0 * flf) TROUSERS \<£ f f)f) II m that formerly, sold C// /-^ .t/t/ . that formerly sold Itp E^»\JU || I THE CLASSIEST MEN'S CLOTHES I W& 'r Tht ''productions 'of the best makers in America, only are represented in this "Sale of All Sales." &j i King Solomon's Hall, Fillmore St. Near Sutter |

Upload: hoangtruc

Post on 21-Jun-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DE YOUNG MAY SAVE SLAYER In IRemoval His :»chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85066387/1908-06-05/ed...Notice name and «Jgn«ture cf Dr.Siegert when con buy Angostura Bitten. Valuable

BRI\GI\G GOtD SOVEREIGNSThe London. Paris and American

bank is expecting a consignment con-sisting of 100.000 gold sovereigns fromthe 'banks of Australia on:the Austra-lian Mail line steamer Aeon which left

Notice name and «Jgn«ture cf Dr.Siegert whencon buy Angostura Bitten. Valuable «tomacWc

A petition. -to'have "the > Alexander

brick and terra cotta: comparty, ;ad-'judged bankrupt. was filed yesterday UiTthe United ;StatesVdistrlct court. Thepetitioners and -the amounts they;claimto be due them are:. The Lewis A. Hickscompany, ;$14,503.85;- the. San Fran-cisco mill .and lumber company,$1,441.18, and ;M. ,A;*..Farnswor-th/$567.5 i.;Ralph Raphael.l a book :keeperresiding In-San. Francisco,", filed a- pe-^tltion in•bankruptcy yesterday in

*the

United States district ? court. ,His- lia-,billties were placed at $553," and heclaimed to have no available asr**^

FILE BANKRUPTCY-PETITIOX

ket streets, presumably because Bakerwas too slow in driving one of theunion buses out of the way of a 'car.After his

"ultimate dismissal on the

charge- which was filed against himYoung boasted that all of his blood\u25a0were gun men and fighters. -_ >

Inspection of the police recordsshows that the two

'boys in custody

were more than mere gun men. Whenthey were 13 years old the register at

'

the Mission station shows that . theywere 'booked for disturbing the peace.Thomas v

Young afterward .was arrestedon a warrant charging malicious-misc-hief. Eighteen months ago the pairwere arrested for breaking into a brew-ery, in"the 2Mission*.' and committingpetty larceny. Yesterday they werefully identified by.the crews^of the twocars who were 'held up Tuesday morn-Ing by masked men at.Powell and Baystreets as the ,men \u25a0 behind the masks.IDENTIFIED*AS THUGS

Both boys will be; taken from detinue'and charged, with, niurder^ today. Anattempt will be, made" to show thatThomas did; the killing. James Twillbenamed .as. an /accessory for.havinggiven his brother the revolver that' wasused. _| • .;-.

\u0084 ,\u25a0.-.., ;.: : •_>-.'\u25a0'\u25a0-' \u25a0

A'heartbroken- mother, *-74;years old,probably -will follow:. Hems: quickly tothe grave. The vdeath- :of ;hervson hasprostrated her. ;'. -Acquaintances-- saythat

-more' -than; [a.-, 'usual

*attachment

existed between', the ;two" and hen sonpractically: lived;to make her life easierin its declining, years.' " '.. - . .

Hems had ibeenf o/i, the rPaciflc 'streetbeat only -eight Jdays, -'-having f beentransferred from '\u25a0 the Chinatown/! squadto filla~ vacancy, made by"a."police-offi-cer on;vacation.- He was appointed/Uqthe Torce September 4,".1896, and- duringhis 12 yearsof -police dutyrserved: withan absolutely; .-perfect record. : .';".'; '..Arrangements • lor. the -funeral .were.completed; yesterday. -\Company^ Aiofthe police*department,; of'which Hemsw;as a member, .will? escort -'his ? bodyfrom the home ;of his*.tho thereat ,2312Larkln street to.St.^ Bridget's ichurchand thence 'to the.' grave.'. A' detall.'of24 men . jtrom)each. -.0f,-;thel other %slxcompanies will-assist. Pall ,;\u25a0• bearershave, not yet been chosen.' Various^sb-*cial and .'athletic clubs- of ~> which-^the'dead . officer , was ',a .member probablywill'be represented. •

,/ , . .;.:A-pitiful incident, was talked 'about

the police; headquarters yesterday. "OntheIafternoon ;of•his-!death \u25a0 Hems, ;be-fore Chief Biggy,.was commended as anefficient 'and- dutiful officer.- -\u25a0'\u25a0-It :- was vhewho'arreste^J the son, of Admiral;Evansthree 'days ago Ina dance hall- row',"onthe coast .and. the;identity, of \his \pris-oner when;- it, became known to>i thepoliceman, set "him .to thinking' thatperhaps ;he jhad 'done

*wrong! %Taking

this matter ';to .his "chief., Hems'; wascommended "instead, of tbeing censured.'PAYS TRIBUTE:TO 'HEIXS?^ VxIna letter \u25a0; sent :yesterday by.'; Chief

Biggy to the police commission", -Hemswas paid a sincere- tributeVby ;his'su- ,perior.rß.lggy, mentioned VHeins'.' spot-less record and- cited"

'examples ;ofbravery that the officer had :;displayedon -'past; occasions.- '"One*»of .«-thebravest, most efficient" and reliable of-ficers in the. department," were \ theterms in which. Biggyyreferred r torHems. Official-notification, to the com-mission by Biggy*of Hems" death wasthe occasion of the. letter.

A rpmarkable case, rendered so by

the striking likeness between twinbrothers, confronts the. police in theirofforts to fasten the guilt for the deathof Policeman William H. Hems, whoivaa shot down In cold blood in a rowon crime stained Barbary coast yester-day morning and who died a few min-

ute? later while being rushed to a hos-pital.

Thomas O. and James Young, twin

brothers. IT years old. are held for

the crime. James Young has

down and in a confession has charged

the murder to his brother. ThomasYoung declares his innocence and says

that liis brother's ttatement is false,

that he is the innocent twin and thatthe shot v.-as fired by James. Tostrengthen Thomas" statement, the re-

volver with which witnesses say Hemsv.-as kiiled was in James Young's pos-

session when he was arrested. A dozenwitnesses, however, have identifiedThomas Young as the murderer. Ineach case the identification was madeby the difference in the clothing;tjiebrothers wore, it being almost impos-

sible to tell them apart by their fea-tures.ISACH ACCUSES OTHER •

Standing face to face in a corridorof the city prison the twins passed thelie to each other yesterday morning,

and James Young pronounced the

words that beyond doubt willsend hisbrotheY to the gallows: <V v

"That is my twin brother. Isaw him

shoot the policeman as the policemanleaned over to pick him up."

This statement was made further to

cement the evidence contained in a

confession which he had already made.When Thomas Young heard his

brother turn against him he raised his

hand above his head, blazed fiercely at

his twin and Ehouted:'"I deny it. You He; it was you that

fired the shots."The brothers were led back to their

separate cells. Later they were takenin charge by Identification DetectiveSergeant Ed Gibson to be photo-

graphed. Their pictures, counterparts

(except where Thomas Young's bruisedand puffed lips protrude), were laVcsed numbers 15*214 and 19215. In filing

them away Sergeant Gibson discoveredthe photograph of an older brother,

Charles A. Young, who served a twoyear term In San Quentin for burglary

committed in Amador county. A pic-

ture of any one of the three might

pass for all, so remarkable is the(ur.siiy resemblance.

Precedent has shown that it is al-most impossible to secure a first de-gree conviction for the murder of apoliceman, but in the present case the

police believe that, despite the conflictthat may arise in establishing identi-ties of twins who are as alike as peas

In v pod, their case is complete.

KEUIKS OX LIKENESSThomas Young declared lightly yes-

terday that he would be cleared."Who can say positively whether it

was 1 or my brother who fired theshot?" he asked. "Iadmit doing theshooting in the saloon, but my pistolwas taken from me in there. Who hadthe pistol that killed the policeman?The man who had it must have fired

the shot and that man was my brother."Thomas Young's attitude has worried

tlie police, but they maintain that theircase has not a single weak link.Crowded Barbary coast, peopled withmen accustomed to crime in all itsphases, accustomed nightly to seeing

and mingling in brawls, witnessed thecold blooded shooting, and so many eye

witnesses have volunteered testimony

that only those whose versions were

the clearest have been accepted by De-

tectives Wren, 'Riordan and McMahon,

who have been detailed on the case.Four sailors. J. J. Bowrassa, James

Wexler and J. J. Cadott from the Kan-sas and George H. Bowman from theMinnesota, together with Emil Van-nucci, bar tender in the O. K. saloon^where the trouble first started, RobertPacheco, a waiter in the same place,

and Michael Maloof, a customer who

tiocd at thi end of the bar, have beeneubpenaed to tell of the initial troubleIn which Thomas Young attempted toshoot Pacheco in an argument over thepayment for some beer he, his b/otlier

.and the sailors had Just drunk.But for the alertness of a nameless

dance hall girl Pacheco would havebeen killed. Young's revolver being

knocked down by her hand as ho flr«dat the waiter. The bullet set fire toYoung's trousers leg, through which itpassed, and the burned garment willesEist the case of the prosecution, aswitnesses on the outside agree that theman whose clothes were afire killedHems.TWO MEX OFXEBVE-

Following the killingof Hems, theYoung brothers fled eastward to Mont-gomery street and along Montgomery

street to Jackson, where they parted,

Thomas diving into a vacant lot at thenorthweft corner and James continuingio a saloon at Jackson and Kearny

Ftreets. Joseph Branchl, who lives atthe Montana house in Pacific street,and F. H- Van Syele, a Morse patrol-man, were the only ones with nerveenough to follow the murderers afterHems was shot. The two, running sideby side a few paces behind the fleeingbrothers, agreed each to take a man.Van Sycle chose Thomas Young andBranch! selected James.

Branch! followed James Young intothe saloon, saw him attempt to hidethe weapon which he said his brotherhanded to him after shooting Hems,and grappled with him just as Police-man John Rocca and John Fullalove, asecond Morse patrolman, burst in thedoor, having seen the two men enter.

When TUomas Young attempted tohide in the darkness of the vacant lotVan Sycle drew his revolver and mount-ed guard on the corner, waiting forassistance. The fugitive could not befound at first when other police officersarrived to begin a search, and whenJames Young was arrested in the sa-loon all but two of the policemen, notunderstanding that there had been twomen involved, gave up the hunt.

'

POLICEMEN GET LAXTKRXSPolicemen Jack Evatt and J. C.

O'Connor, Impressed by Van Sycle'searnestness in declaring that tbe realmurderer was still in the lot, remainedon guard. Van Sycle procured lanternsand the three finally found ThomasYoung where he had crawled under-neath a section of the caved In side-walk. A red necktie which willbe ofimportance in distinguishing Thomasfrom James had been torn off by thehiding man, but was also found by thevigilant policemen. Captain Duke ofthe central station yesterday -drafteda letter to Van Sycle commending himfor his good work and thanking him onbehalf of the police department for hispart in capturing the accepted mur-

1

dlerer.Th<? Young twins both served the

United Railroads 'as strike-breakersduring the recent . trouble.^ Theirfather,' Beauregard Young, is- an ,in:epector, for-the company. During thestrike disturbances 'the father shot W.11. Baker, a striker, at Third and Mar-

»Police Confronted With Difficul-

ty of Proving Which of Them

Killed Policeman

LIKENESS OF TWINSMAYSAVE SLAYER

Poiiceman William H. Hems, slain on Barbary Coast,* andThomas 9. Young (left) 'and; James': Young,/ twin;brothers,

one of whom killed the patrolman ; also a diagram showing itheroute taken, by the brothers and the' places /.where they were

DE YOUNG PLEADSIRRESPONSIBILITYIn Burns Libel Case, v Chronicle

EditorsjDehy His Controlof Paper's Policy

)'". .;IilUe,;. "ttle;.actual progress \u25a0-\u25a0 wasra ade •

yesterday in *Pol ice:Jud ge"(Ca-*baniss'. court 'in the"' preliminary, ex-"amination 'ofithe criminal .libel chargebrought^ byj;Special Agent William «J:Burns! against 1^ M.:H.-de Young, allegededitor ;and|proprietor of the San Fran-cisco t Chronicle;?: enough :developed r togive; Promise ithat:the case will,bringout more matter of public Interest thanat:first" seemed Jikely.','.' • \u25a0

'- '\u25a0...".'•John, P. Young?and liuberf E. Hunt,

respectively managing editor and:cityeditor ofithe Chroniclei- were the ionlywitnesses \u25a0examined.." .,The burden ;of

:their testimony was of 'a -somewhatsurprlsing-nature, .being directly, to theeffect ..that M.;H..jde ;;,Young, generallysupposed- to- be .sole -and .supreme :;incontrol fat the/ paper's destiny, \has .lit-Itie more :to do :with It's actual manage- jment than its office boy. :

If.'the 'testimony;' of :his 'two"'/envl

ployes; may beVbelieved, iDe .Young' is |neither 'the proprietor nor the editorof.: the . Chronicle,^ does not .direct ;itspolicy in any:. way, is" not even con-sulted by 'employes 'of the -papercerning questions of policy and ;neverinterferes .with the judgment of thosewho* say .they -do shape its deviouscourse."- Not 15e; Young, /but the SanFrancisco Chronicle publishing com-pany, a Nevada' corporation, is the pro-prietor."of ;>the" paper, and; ManagingEditor .John:P. Young is in absolutecontrol "of its" editorial and" news col-umns. "Young .himself testified thatthe only restraint he felt was that hemight hesitate: to adopt -such a: sweep-Ing Innovation as a change of partypolitics for/the paper without consulta-tion. ; ;,* \u0084::\u25a0. "-;; h/l<y \u25a0 '...-. _.::XEVER COXSUt,TS DE YOUNG

De • Young was not vin court |to face~Burns' charge of criminal libel in per-son,: but:was represented by AttorneysHiram "W. Johnson,; Reuben- H. :Lloydand 'D. M. Duffey,. the former takingthe most active-part in conducting: thedefense. Young was the first;witnesscalled. He lost no time. in acknowledg-ing himself as editor of the paper,"as-sighing to M. H.de Young,the. officialposition of "financial' manager.' Youngstated, however, that he was .not

*a

member- of. the board of directors ofthe Nevada corporation and was un-familiar with its personnel. Asked fromwhom he received .jinstructions . con-cerning the policyror \management ofthe. paper Young, responded:

"Idon't receive instructions. Iprac-tically-run'-the concern. :I-'don't y.re-ceive instructions from or consult withanybody." \u25a0

"""*• < "Didn't you ever, consult with Mr.deYoung as to the policy to be pursuedin relation to the graft prosecution?"questioned \Heney In a,tone of surprise.

'.'Never." was the answer given aftera number of objections ;.to;the questloahad been advanced;by the defendant'scounsel and disposed

"of. Attorney

Lloyd spent some time developing thetheory that unless a defendant in sucha case was proved to be either theeditor or the "of the paperor else the author of the allegedlibelous article he could not be held forlibel, and then proceeded to insist thatDe Young had already been shown tobe neither, the editor, nor proprietor.•_; "Proprietorship/ and '.editorship)' arematters /of fact and ,not of name,"-: an-swered Heney. .'"We /propose: to .showthat this Nevada' corporation. is merelya dummy affair, organized for' the pur-pose; of:evading legal liability,"^and toprove that De Young is,* In\ fact; whateverybody., .In San Francisco -believeshim be

—"'There was -an "expectant

hush." as -Heney paused; *but he con-tinue'd,:*'^—both" owner and editor of theChronicle."

'

'/; ,' |CAN'T

'LESSEN";RESPOXSIBILITY ,

"Dummy agencies," «Heney .added,"cannot lessen 'his responsibility.'! .; ;-

Managing Editor \ Young said thatthe alleged libelous article accompany-ing, the Snell affidavit in last SaturdaysIssue'-of the paper was written by a-re-porter,/Stuart Masters,;" and that 1

*

hehimself :haa not seen'it until after pub-lication, although "he had "been con-sulted about it;by City Editor.Hunt.be-fore I[t.was written. & De

-Young,|he

said, wasiat his- San; Rafael^ home- atthe time and knew .nothing; about thearticle.- ''\u25a0: /, '\:.'-~l~',[ :.

-: .]. ,_ .•

-Heney asked Young IfDe Young, had

not; told him /at /one time 'or another topublish' all hetcould'agairist: the prose-cution, .and received the .answer: : "Onthe contrary, 'lie,has frequently; depre-cated whatvwe -have' done." r

-"Idon't' wonder," commented' Heney..Heney /concluded" Young's examina-

tion by asking if;the witness did notremember two v'occaslohs /oh which ::hehad discussed the policy,of|the •

Chron-icle: with De Young'in'the presence olRudolph; Spreckels and:Heney' himself.Young remembered ;: the . instances %re-ferred }to, but:his .recollection -of-whatwas said was vague v.and. uncertain.The S firsts occasion

'referred' ;to '-wag at

the:time :ofitheIbeginning'; of \u25a0 the graftprosecution, when",Heney- and Spreckelscalled upon Young, to/ learn* whatpollcythe

'Chronicle ;.would'vpursue,

'and, )ac-

cording to'Heney,\ were /told by;Youngthat j.he would C have Sito/'/'consult DeYoung before ;: determining Fthls - policy.Young'admitted ./visiting '.Heney/at' the"latter's' office "company, withVcityEditor,Hunt;at , a /later:date, 1

but;didnot!/ remember .having^ toldjHeney

-arid

Spreckels then that De .Young:had 'com-plained1about "the"policy of, the ipaperand'.told'hlm^to :beZmore , favorable -tothe'.prosecutlon."' .\u25a0"\u25a0'.*'\u25a0:"

' :. ''"\u25a0-\u25a0',". v'^iji:::.vWe /went'/to -you' then /to tell youthat ;you were fhot ',treatihg;us fas \u25a0 fairly,about" giving^ out*.news; as :;you* weretreating _the -/other,-,/piapers,"- /declaredYoung.- _ .•'. . \u25a0\u25a0:' ..;\u25a0 \ :-;J v -\u25a0. .\u25a0: ;fi"Yes,1.:/ re_tpr te^Heney, ;"andididn't'i

COURT IS ASKEDTOREVERSE DECISION

Lawyers Seek to Change theRuling on Legislature's

Special Holidays,r.

When is a" holiday, not .a, holiday?

The supreme <ourt of'the state has

already answered 'this question,-but

the disciples .of. Blackstone :are stillpegging -away at a. problem: .whichthe lay 'mind has long ago -given?up ashopeless, and in

-a petition .filed . yes-

terday the learned justices are askedto guess again.' • '

', '/-The. supreme court, decided May 15

that the*act creating .the special holi-days -declared by the governor -duringthe flate'- financial crisis* was r clearlyclass legislation /and/ -consequentlyvoid."

-The

'fj-iehds of;lthe

'court, ;as

they -are -styled 'in. -yesterday's, peti-tion, feel .that :the jstatets* moat Iaugusttribunal.lwks ;wrong, =-and Lay.rehearingof/ the' original, "case: isiasked."

' C 'iZThe . original' petitioneriwas 'jM. H."IMepenbrock 'and the court •ofSacramento fcounty*,; was '^tKe*!respond-"ent. .Yestefday's'petitJon'T.was .filed by!Cushihg, Grant ?& Ciishing '.' as •friendsbfr'.'the: court,- \ .:.;.,... . . \u25a0 \u25ba .

The petition maintains that -thou-sands ;of'the t debtor fclass will

'be \in-'\in-

jured_- If-the, .present r"declsion Vis .al-lowed jto;stand, -while;only:ajcompara-tively:few ofithe^'credltor^class^willbe] injured*ifIthe •:holidays'; are', \u25a0de-clared .'legal.'

'The ,::petitioners* .'argue

that the ;act "..was !not »class) legislation,"as the: effect » to i>both jthe; creditortanddebtor 'classes; wpuldlh'ave.been"equal-*ily'disastrous -if. the" demands '."of,depos-"ito'rs ;on" the" banks vhad.been, enforcedby^the^courts 'at Uhe

"tltheifof the :panic;"

The petitioning i.;;.attorneys *>Vsubmitthat

'they .\u25a0.•',.are ':\u25a0 -\u0084representing

who, relying';on'»the'tact'-"cre"ating"the

holidays/i entered: . Into ','(\u25a0\u25a0 b]»siness '. ar-rangejnents^^wblch^wlilt3"ca.usej;tHemgreat \u25a0 loss 4if the' legality; of^the'-legls-;lation »• is, 'not ft sustained.;";,^Banks'; andother' cre'ditors' are*now,;subject ;to lossif

* they,; 'failed-

to;protest 1}notes v whenthey fell;due';i On-the'other/hand.'Jt Isargued that- Itfis ipow,'ot 'tno" ? practicalmoment to' any. foneTas

-rto"}what«.busl^

nesss a 'court-* couia• transact: dry;the

legal> holidays.-This \last' point;was .the

gist*of*the ;decision r,in^which,.the;holi-'

days iwere declared flip'sholidays at all;

as It:;was -decided-? 'in'{ilt?.that vthe? su-perior \ court' of\u25a0':< Sacramento] county;hadthe right to^try.Janf action for:;the"cnr;forcement"ofUheJ payment jotran -obli-gation •:during i;the holidays.';!

\u25a0 Theichiefs argument.; of\ the '.petition'fs'. that/, the'; 'question! fdecided.^by §thecourt was « and that the .^purely

academicrside-*of ,Uhe 'problems shouldnot be allowed: to \theKclearintentions of the 'legislators,*"!; whopassed". the^ act. for the. relief of' thYwhole; state.; 7;.'\u25a0\u25a0:\\"y.\z . ;

THE SAN^RAN(JIB(JO^CAIiL-^m

Gray and bleached hairrestored to anynatural .color.byjthe Hatestvpreparation.-S..:Strozynski?Co.;sl24B sSutter|street:i^

tell you I'd keep on holding out as long

as your, paper continued to He about

the . proseoution?"'

J The question went unanswered, and,

with the answer";to;the -former ques-tion,'was stricken from .the record:, _ ,

City Editor Hunt's (testimony - wasmuch like \ tha't>';of

"Managing Editor

:Ybung. He declared that 'he took.or-,ders from .Young- alone"; arid had neverbeen *given, instructions^ by De Young

as to the general' hews- policy of thepaper. He searched: his memory anddecldedt that De Young might havegivenJ»im minor news Items: once ortwicef^ut beyond that he had never in-terfered. HuntV.was also hazy aboutthe meetings with Heney and Spreck-

elsV*and qualified his.statements as be-ing only "to the best of his recollec T

tion."' :. . w ''\u25a0 - -'

HENEY CALLS FOR BOOKS

rf:Heney called the secretary-treasurer

"of. the San '-;Francisco Chronicle -pub-lishing company ;to the stand ,with the

intention of examining: the; stock booksof the corporation in an effort to^provethat DelYoung £is editor; and \proprietorof the Ciironicle'in.fact, ifnot in name,

but the |Introduction of this line of tes-:ttmony was

'strenuously ;objected to.by

Hiram '"W..Johnson.;? During; the argu-

ment -that 'ensued Judge Cabaniss |tooka part in the discussion, saying; at.one

time: ;"Isuppose, that-even KMr.deYoung owned 1all the stock of.the cor-poration": 11

'Is that, with mar-

,velous rmodesty and self-abnegation,* hemight;forego

'the jcontrol of the paper

and [place'itf all;in'Mr/iYoung's hands.

Siich a course- would1ordinarily seemrather unusual, but-some, men may beconstituted upon -that -peculiar line." :

*,vAn adjournment .was taken untilMonday iafterno"on;:at12 o'clock; :whenargument' on ;"the jadmission ;of :testi-mony>.willibeiicontinued. :. Members j;ofDe.Young's counsel; suggested to Heney

after adjournment; that iheishouldmiss the 'case 1against^'De Young,\and.ifihe still wished: to|pursue the;matter,bring,charges against Managing Editor.Young.,? Heney. fell-in" thoroughly,^withthe' latter> part of^the; suggestion,- de-claring <that^ he >wbuld. follow ;it to- theletter, -jbutrinslstingi, that; he';would atthe same 'time )fight1the ;De -Young caseto'a-flhlsh^. : .' "V \u25a0;"'.: . '.\u25a0'.'-:\u25a0

Byron Hot .Springs

For your..week end rest. 7-Two and one-hdlf \hours'- 4,easy,:ride from. San 1

*Fran-

cisco onr the' line *ofithe- Southern Pa-cific. :..'."\u25a0 ;..•';• -i

Sydney. Australia, the early part oflast month. The sold sovereigns areequal to about 1456.400. and upon thereceipt of the coins they will be takento the United States mint here and bereminted into American twenty-dollargold pieces. . . .

16

Are you getting

on your;-money?.;rOcean. Shore; Railway^^are :,being xsoldi direct vto theypublicifa^^S^fpr-cashror;^^

•-

V.Thesejtjorids are secured :byjajfirst;m'qrtgage'of '$5,000*000 :onHhe^entire; assets of the •;company; amounting to*iover$9,000,000.; ;6cean^ Shore 1 BondsJ; are r not

• asseXsable?andfriet' ;myestors s.43) per^cent} interest?":.. v/.TheVstock'-'' holders i of - the;rOcean; Shbre^ have investedover:$3,ooo,ooo]pf^theirown inoneynih^tHisjemerprise.': Write^for^Oc^ilSHbrei>Breezes, an illustrated? magazine

.aboutthe railway—sent "free: , \ .. <;

Ocean Shore Railw^ Go.: 58 Eleventh St., San Francisco

:ForjlnfiEuita and CMlcbrei . •:The Kind Have Always Bought

Bears the y^lji^ //&/>.- /i \u25a0*.

Two Money

Today and tomorrow—Friday and Saturday—

mark the'close of our ANNUALSPRING PIANO CLEARANCE andof your opportunity to buy a high:gfade, -artistic piano at aprice 1201 20 to 25 per cent below actual values.

This sale is 1 a success ;because;it -is bonafide- and the re-ductions are money discounts, on. actual bed-rock valuations,not on fictitious prices arranged to suit the occasion, as is

.customary with some dealers. The pianos offered are the best\u25a0'", argument of the genuineness of the,opportunity. New, beau- irtjful instruments' of full size, jn finest finished cases as low as$156.00. 'y Others at $180, wliich ought to.bring $250. For\$230^00, ;^42.od?and up t05267.00 we are selling pianos that

\u25a0elsewhere are held at-*.$400.00 !and upwards. At prices lessthan $300.00 we show beautiful high grade instruments of themost reputable factories in the land which in most stores are:priced .; at .from $450.00 to $600.00. These are piano values of.the highest type :and surely merit your consideration.

: Big payments are;not necessary on the smaller priced in-struments^We/wiil accept as low:as $6.00 monthly, $7.50^'$B^oo and .slo.oo; for the more expensive styles. All bear ithe <

unqualified guarantee of our house— the guarantee that makesgood. AlLrare,tuned and cared. for free for one year and your*

\u25a0 satisfaction in-the .smallest detail is assured. ,

Two days more— two days of money saving opportunity;which/ properly taken advantage of, means happiness in the

:.hdme, the ownership of a;Veally. good "piano and a substantial\ saving jn-the buying. Come in..

"-r~ \u25a0 y -510 Twelfth St. 1220-24 Van Ness Ay.-

Other;Stores— Los Angeles, Sari .>Diego, Sacramento, San\u25a0

: -\u25a0-

'joicEtc . • ; ; ,

IRemoval Sale MXiP^illU Wpn,, Ye, IS vVe have the good* Af"si»i*' r̂t ;t*-» *-- ft. rtfv*

~~~t^

\u25a0 ur \>n ny 1 MnzX'Meilns &(fa :»hich pfoves the reco g- III! WC tdL the tTUth <£ cIXXS X V t niiion^of Merit. Value g

I | gloikiera |°nd Qualitv' : ' 1

IThe First Sale We Ever Held I9 \u0084 ••:./:•;.,- . THE LARGEST CROWD of Satisfied and Sur- Hpi *\u25a0

- prised, good natured buyers ever assembled under, one roof ' W}

| No Nonsense About This Sale IXasive never have anticipated sales) i|]

I The Choice of the House I

m :::'ANY SUIT OR:OVERCOAT <£ O /~\ (If) M

W*W^" that formcrltfsbld fromj£4o to $70 ': 3 \ #^ ==== ri

I Celebrated Paragon Trousers 1m t

- • \u25a0

\u25a0- ' ••'\u25a0\u25a0\u25a0\u25a0\u25a0\u25a0\u25a0 \u25a0

"-- ' •~; MHRB Tili« -! , (PARACON

'TROUSFRS ARF ART\

' I*3

M :•\u25a0"\u25a0\u25a0-\u25a0.'\u25a0 ;\u25a0\u25a0:• '-'}._"-- . ' The price revision IThe price revision i*^|I\% JROUSERS\: <£'"/\u25a0

*flf) TROUSERS \<£ f f)f) II

m that formerly, sold C// /-^ .t/t/ . that formerly sold Itp E^»\JU ||

I THE CLASSIEST MEN'S CLOTHES IW& 'r Tht''productions 'of the best makers in America, only are represented in this "Sale of AllSales." &j

iKing Solomon's Hall, Fillmore St. Near Sutter |