Slide 1

DDI and Assessments in Mathematics: Analyzing and Tracking Data at the 6-12 Level May 13, 2014

Slide 2

Session Objectives Be able to describe what to look for when analyzing student work for a Common Core- aligned assessment Be able to create a data tracker for assessments Develop questions that drive data-analysis meetings around Common Core-aligned assessment data

Slide 3

Agenda Introduction Warm Up: Review of Assessment Design Looking at Student Work Examples Time with work you brought Tracking Student Work Leading a Data Meeting with Questions Q & A

Slide 4

Introduction Part I: Assessment (February) Part II: Analysis* (May) Part III: Action (July)

Slide 5

*Analysis is hard. We dont want to granularize content but we have to do something to look under the hood We want our students engaged in rich tasks but we want to dig into the work associated with the tasks to learn specifics about what our students know and can do We dont want to put rigor in silos or to create a checklist for rigor but we want usable information about how are kids are doing with respect to the demands of the Common Core

Slide 6

Warm Up: Review of Assessment Design 1. What makes this assessment Common Core-aligned? 2. Critique this. How could it be improved?

Slide 7

Review: What Two Things Make a Great Common Core Assessment? 1. Balance of rigor 2. Variety of levels

Slide 8

Think Aloud I knew some of my students were functioning below grade level, so I used the RP domain heading to locate similar understandings at the 6 th grade level. This drove instruction for my unit and allowed for more differentiation. I tried to include a variety of prompts/question types that would offer a balance of rigor. This drove instruction for my unit and ensured a balance of rigor throughout the unit.

Slide 9

Examine Sample Assessment First Focus Question: Imagine looking at some student work associated with this assessment. What kinds of errors do you think youd see? What would these errors reveal about students?

Slide 10

Looking at Student Work Second Focus Question: Look at the work from Veronica and Englebert. What kinds of errors do you see? What do these errors reveal about students?

Slide 11

This Evenings Two Big Ideas: Analyze student work based on: 1. The grade level standard(s) being measured 2. The type of error, viewed through a rigor* lens

Slide 12

*Rigor Means Different Things to Different People Procedural Conceptual Application

Slide 13

Veronica

Slide 14

Slide 15

Slide 16

Slide 17

Slide 18

Slide 19

Englebert

Slide 20

Slide 21

Slide 22

Slide 23

Slide 24

Slide 25

Summary Notice: 1. The grade level standard(s) being measured 2. The type of error, viewed through a rigor* lens

Slide 26

Activity Spend some time with student work that you brought. What standards are being measured? What types of errors are being made? If you didnt bring any student work, look at the annotated items.

Slide 27

How Do We Track Data?

Slide 28

Tracking The Class

Slide 29

Each Item, Through Multiple Lenses

Slide 30

Useful Disaggregation

Slide 31

Slide 32

Possible Modifications Break down data to show strategies employed (e.g., table, equation) Break down P, C, A further (e.g., P Division of fractions) Include other lenses (e.g., vocabulary, writing) Also tag items at performance levels, using PLDs Tag items to more than one standard

Slide 33

Using Questions to Lead Data Meetings Bambrick ModelBased on Paul Bambrick- Santoyos Driven By Data Well look at: Pre-Cursors (what happens before a data meeting) Conversation Starters and Re-Directors (what happens during a data meeting) $64,000 Question: How might these look different using a Common Core-aligned assessment?

Slide 34

Pre-Cursors

Slide 35

How would we prepare differently for a Common Core assessment meeting? What different activities would we ask teachers to do? What different questions would we pose?

Slide 36

Conversation Starters & Re-Directors

Slide 37

What would be different during a Common Core assessment meeting? What different activities would we ask teachers to do? What different questions would we pose?

Slide 38

This Evenings Two Big Ideas, Revisited: Analyze student work based on: 1. The grade level standard(s) being measured 2. The type of error, viewed through a rigor lens

Slide 39

Session Objectives Be able to describe what to look for when analyzing student work for a Common Core- aligned assessment Be able to create a data tracker for assessments Develop questions that drive data-analysis meetings around Common Core-aligned assessment data

Slide 40

Thanks! Q & A