dcpcr annual report 2011-12 english final

Annual Report2011-12

Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights

CO

NT

EN

TS Foreword ................................................................................................................1

Introduction ...........................................................................................................2

Functions ................................................................................................................3

Initiatives ................................................................................................................5

Consultations/Meetings ......................................................................................9

Jan Sunvai/Public Hearing................................................................................12

Studies and Reports ............................................................................................17

Financial Statement.............................................................................................19

Annexure ..............................................................................................................27

Annual Report 2011-12

The Delhi Commission for Protection of a function on the occasion of the

Child Rights continued its work with International Anti Child Labour Day on 14

reviewed vigour in the financial year 2011- June, 2011. On this occasion, the Hon'ble

2012. Even though the Commission had Chief Minister Smt. Sheila Dikshit

only 4 Members, the work of the launched an Integrated Child Labour

Commission was not allowed to suffer. The Project for addressing issues relating to

meetings of the Commission were held street and working children of Delhi. The

regularly and all aspects of child rights Commission also actively coordinated a

were discussed and deliberated by the campaign with Civil Society Organizations

Commission in furtherance of the best against child sexual abuse.

interest of the children of the National The Annual Report of DCPCR for 2011-

Capital Territory of Delhi. From September 2012 lists the key areas of intervention by

2011 the Commission was handicapped in the Commission in the financial year,

the absence of a full time Chairperson as including the Consultations/Meetings

well. However, it was ensured that matters where the Commission was a participant.

of immediate importance were addressed, As one of the first State Commissions to be

particularly in the area of child labour and set up, the DCPCR can justifiably take

Right to Education. Of particular relevance pride in the fact that it has launched several

was the concern expressed by the initiatives which have been adopted and

Commission regarding the problems faces followed by other State Commissions.

by children at construction sites during the

Common Wealth Games and also the

matter of child beggars. The Commission,

in coordination with different Govt.

agencies espoused the cause of the rights of

child beggars as well as homeless and

destitute children. Issues concerning

children in need of care and protection

were handled with sensitivity. (ARUN MATHUR)

The Commission was an active participant CHAIRPERSON

along with the Labour Department of the DCPCR

Govt. of NCT of Delhi in the organization of

Foreword

1


IntroductionThe Commission

The Delhi Commission for Protection of

C h i l d R i g h t s ( D C P C R ) h a s b e e n

constituted under the Commissions for

Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005 read

w i t h t h e G o v t . o f I n d i a , M H A ' s

Notification F.No. U-11030/1/2007-UtL

dated 15 January, 2008, gazetted by the

Govt. of NCT of Delhi on 7 July, 2008.

Further u/s 13(1j) of the Commissions

for Protection of Child Rights Act 2005, this

Commission is empowered to undertake

inquiry into complaints and to take suo-

motu notice of matters relating to : (i)

deprivation and violation of child rights

(ii) Non-implementation of laws providing

for protection and development of children

(iii) Non-compliance of policy decisions,

guidelines or instructions aimed at

mitigating hardships to ensuring welfare

of the children and to provide relief to such

children or to take up the issues arising out

of such matters with the appropriate

authorities.

2


- To suggest legal safeguards for protection available against abuse of Child

of Child Rights and recommend Measures Rights

- Enquire into violations of Child Rights - To enquire into complaints and take suo-

and initiation of proceedings motu notice of matters related to:

- Examine Rights of Children affected by A. Deprivation and violation of Child

terrorism, violence, disaster, HIV/ AIDS, Rights;

trafficking, mal-treatment, exploitation, B. N o n - i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f l a w s

pornography & prostitution, recommend providing for protection and

re-medial measuresdevelopment of children;

- Look into matters of children in need C. Non-compliance of policy decisions,

of care & protection, distressed, guidelines or instructions aimed at

marginalized, disadvantaged, juveniles in mitigating hardships to and ensuring

conflict with law, children without family the welfare of the children and to

and children of prisoners for appropriate provide relief to such children or take

remedial measuresup the issues arising out of such

- Review of Treaties, International mattes with appropriate authorities;

Instruments, Govt. Policies, programmes - Such other functions as it may consider

& activities in the best interest of childrennecessary for the promotion of child rights

- Inspection of Juvenile/Children, and any other matter incidental to the

residential institutions for proper care, above functions.

treatment, reformation and protection.The Commission has all powers of a Civil

- Monitor implementation of Right to Free Court with respect to the following matters:

& Compulsory Education Act.- Summoning and enforcing the attendance

- To monitor the cases of rescue & of any person and examining him/her on

rehabilitation of Child Labour oath;

- To spread awareness about Child Rights - Receiving evidence on Affidavits;

and related issues through seminars, - Requisitioning any Public Record or copy

workshops, publications, media etc. thereof from any Court or Office.

and promote awareness of safeguards

Functions

3


- Issuing commissions for the examination violation of child rights and

of witnesses or documents; provisions of law during the course of

an inquiry;- Forwarding cases to Magistrates who

have jurisdiction to try the same; B. To approach the Supreme Court or the

Delhi High Court for such directions, - O n c o m p l e t i o n o f i n q u i r y , t h e

orders or writs as that Court may Commission has the powers to take the

deem necessary.following actions:

To recommend to concerned Government or A. To recommend to concerned

authority for grant of such interim relief to Government for ini t ia t ion of

the victim or the members of his family as proceedings for prosecution or other

considered necessary;suitable action on finding any

4


opening Residential Schools where such Observance of International Anti-chi ldren could rece ive educat ion, Child Labour Dayincluding employment skills till class 12th.

On the occasion of the international Anti-She also supported DCPCR's vision to

Child Labour Day, a function was converge the efforts of various government

organized by the Commission and departments at one place as it would

Department of Labour, Govt. of NCT of improve the effectiveness of delivery

D e l h i o n 1 4 J u n e , 2 0 1 1 a t I n d i a system which would ultimately bring

International Centre, New Delhi. The Chief phenomenal changes in the ground

Minister of Delhi, Mrs. Sheila Dixit realities.

launched an Integrated Child Labour

Child LabourProject to address the needs of street and

working children of Delhi. The event was Since the constitution of the DCPCR,

attended by Prof. Kiran Walia, Minister of Child labour has been the area of

Women & Child Development; Mr. constant monitoring and intervention

Arvinder Singh Lovely, Minister of by the Commission. In the light of

Education and Mr. Ramakant Goswami, judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court

Minister of labour, prominent NGOs,

media persons and other key officials of

GNCTD.

Launching the project, Mrs. Dikshit made a

crucial announcement to make Delhi free

of child labour and appealed to civil society

organizations to join hands with the

government in this endeavor. The hon'ble

CM said that the Government of Delhi

would explore possibilities to compensate

the family of every child labour by paying a

monthly suitable amount in the same way

as it distributes pension to various

segments of society. Further she stated that

she would ask the Department of

Education to explore possibilities of

Initiatives

5


in July 2009, DCPCR has been closely Review Meeting with Hon'ble monitoring the rescue and rehabilitation of Minister for Women and Child child labour. The Commission has been Development, Govt. of NCT of Delhi monitoring issues like the process of in the Commission.institutionalizing the rehabilitation of

A R e v i e w M e e t i n g w a s h e l d o n child labour, Task Forces constituted convergence/implementation of the under the Chairmanship of Deputy schemes (Bachpan Sanwarti Dilli) for Commissioners in each district and rescue rehabilitation of children in difficult o f c h i l d r e n f r o m h a z a r d o u s a n d circumstances in Delhi run by Department non-hazardous occupations and the of Labour, Department of WCD, SSA process of compensation recovery. Department of Education, Govt. of NCT of

The Commission has also prepared Delhi on August 18, 2011 at the Conference format for monthly monitoring of rescue Hall, DCPCR. This meeting was chaired by of children which has been accepted Hon'ble Minister, Women and Child by the Delhi government. Each district Development Prof. Kiran Walia and was sends detailed report of the children a t t e n d e d b y a l l M e m b e r s o f t h e rescued from child labour as per the Commission, Joint Labour Commissioner, format. (Details of 2011-2012 figures officials of Department of Women and attached). C h i l d D e v e l o p m e n t , E d u c a t i o n

Department, Health Department, Civil The data received for the year 2011-2012 Society Organizations and Child Line etc. from various districts shows that the total Department of Women and Chi ld number of children rescued were 924. Of Development as a road map and follow up these rescued children maximum were action, submitted that department had rescued from North-West District (250 given advertisement in the Times of India children). The lowest performing districts for establishing “Open shelter homes were South-West and New Delhi from under ICPS Scheme”. Mr. Piyush Sharma where report of no children rescued was submitted that Department of Labour had received. Commission appreciated the organized a meeting on July, 7, 2011 under concern showed by the districts towards the Chairmanship of Chief Secretary, rescuing children. Number of cases from Govt. of NCT of Delhi in which it was where Rs. 20000 was recovered from the decided to set up sixty TL Centers under employers was 152. Total number of NCLP Scheme to rehabilitate children children who were restored/repatriated to engaged in hazardous occupation. Labour their family was 352 while 48 cases were Department is in the process of developing follow-up with the source state.

6


sponsorship scheme to cover more recognizing, resisting and reporting

children in the 12 five year plan. sexual abuse and unsafe touch. The

campaign has been designed with the Chuppi Todo – A Campaign against

vision of creating safe and child friendly Child Sexual Abuse

environment in the communities and

i n s t i t u t i o n s w h e r e Child Sexual Abuse

children could feel (CSA) is the physical or

secure and attain their mental violation of a

full potential. Under c h i l d w i t h s e x u a l

the campaign critical intent, usually by an

issues related to child older person who is in

s e x u a l a b u s e a n d some position of trust

awareness of children and/ or power vis-à-vis

a n d c o m m u n i t i e s the child. According to

t o w a r d s s a f e a n d Child line, India has the

unsafe touch, reporting world's largest number

a n d r e s p o n s e a r e of sexual ly abused

addressed throughchildren; with a child

below 16 years raped • Screening of film

every 155th minute. A Chuppi Todo/ TV

child below 10 is abused spots: focused on

every 13th hour. World Rules of Touch

Health organization • Media campaign through Live media, (2000) says one in every 10 children is

news mediaabused at any given time in India.

• Training and capacity building of Under the guidance of DCPCR, the various stakeholders including parents, “Chuppi Todo” campaign was launched in children, media, police and teachersDelhi on 7 June 2011 at the India Habitat

Centre by Prof. Kiran Walia, Hon'ble Implementation: Under the guidance of M i n i s t e r f o r W o m e n a n d C h i l d Delhi Commission of Protection of Child Development, Government of NCT of rights (DCPCR) the campaign was led by Delhi. AVBT and Plan India (Delhi State Office).

Chuppi Todo is a campaign to increase The campaign is expected to reach at least awareness among children, parents, two lakh children and around 50% of communities and stakeholders about adults living in different areas of Delhi.

7


children enrolled in Government schools Fire and Life Safety Measures in of Delhi. Schools:

The Directorate of Education issued Chairman, Citizen Awareness and Welfare Circular to all heads of school to apply for society on 15 March 2011 wrote to No Objection Certificate to the Director, Chairperson, DCPCR that the Government Fire Services, New Delhi. It also convened a schools in Delhi do not have any fire-workshop cum conference at each district fighting, building fitness and health to solve problems in implementation of certificates. He requested the Commission Fire Safety measures and in obtaining NOC to intervene with Directorate of Education from Fire Services Department. to provide all these facilities to children

studying in Government schools. Due to the intervention of the Commission,

the Directorate of education, Government Taking cognizance of the matter the of NCT, New Delhi as well as other Commission asked the Director Education authorities like Municipal Corporation of to issue necessary instructions to all Delhi and Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas schools to obta in bui lding safe ty and other concerned agencies took certificate, health certificate, fire fighting necessary action with respect to fire safety certificate etc, keeping in view the measures in their schools.safety and security of large number of

8


Consultation

A two day consultation on

Alternative form of Child

Care was organized by

“Save the Children” under

JJ Act and ICPS on 22 and

23 December 2011. It was

attended by Mr. M.M.

Vidyarthi, Member DCPCR

as Guest of Honour. Mr.

Vidyarthi shared his views

on ICPS scheme and other

provisions of child care.

He emphasized on the need Member Planning Commission inviting to search out methodology, design and various agencies to look into how ICPS strategy to increase reporting system and scheme was being implemented. The de- institutionalize the number of children meeting was attended by Mr. M.M. who are living in institutions for care. Vidyarthi, Member DCPCR.Further, the state and local level structures/

Right to Free and Compulsory bodies and monitoring mechanisms, set up

Education Act, 2009under ICPS, should be strengthened in all

possible manner with active involvement of Right to Free and Compulsory Education

civil society organizations to ensure quality Act, 2009 marked a historical moment for

non-institutional care for each child. the children of the country as it guaranteed

their right to get quality elementary Meeting on ICPS Scheme:education in neighbourhood schools. The

A meeting was organized by Planning Act came into force w.e.f. from 1 April, 2010. Commission on 17 October 2011under the Under sec t ion-31 of th is Act the chairmanship of Ms. Syeda Hameed, responsibility of monitoring a child's right

Consultations/Meetings

9


to education would lie with the State public conscious of the right of their

Commissions for Protection of Child Rights. children hence, there was a spurt in the

number of the cases reported to DCPCR in Since 2010-11 was the first year of the

the year 2011-2012. 280 cases were enactment of the said Act, a large number of

processed in DCPCR in this year out of cases were reported to the Commission,

which 187 cases were disposed off. The involving approximately 12,000 children.

remaining 93 cases are in process. Besides Most of the cases were related to denial of

this, the Commission also followed up a admission either in public recognised

sizable number of cases which were schools or Govt. run schools. After one year

reported to this Commission in the previous of the operationalisation of the said Act,

year i.e. 2010-2011. Cases reported to this people got sensitized about various

Commission can be broadly grouped into provisions contained in RTE Act, 2009. The

the following categories:-awareness about the Act made general

Category Cases

Denial of admission to children in a neighbourhood School ................................................90

Denial of admission to children for want of certain documents ...........................................2

Charging of admission fee, fee for ID Cards, PTA fund/exam fee etc .................................1

Holding of entrance test or interaction with parents ...............................................................2

Denial of admission under EWS Quota .....................................................................................86

Collection of capitation fee from parents ....................................................................................2

Adverse teacher pupil ratio/vacancies of teachers in Schools ...............................................2

No arrangement of special educators in schools .......................................................................2

Lack of basic amenities in schools................................................................................................13

Lack of barrier free infrastructure in schools ............................................................................1

Non availability of all weather buildings in schools (tented schools) ..................................2

Discrimination with children admitted under EWS Quota ...................................................11

Corporal punishment in schools .................................................................................................20

Child subjected to mental harassment ........................................................................................10

10


Injury to children/ death of a child in school ............................................................................3

Holding back of child before completing elementary education...........................................5

Poor quality of mid day meal in schools .....................................................................................1

Increase in school fees without resorting to prescribed procedure ......................................5

Corruption in schools ....................................................................................................................10

Closer of schools/sale of recognized schools ............................................................................1

Denial of entitlements such as uniform/scholarship/stipend/

stationary items/text books in schools ........................................................................................5

Engagement of teachers in non academic work other than permitted under RTE Act .....2

Admission of children with special needs ..................................................................................2

Denial of readmission .....................................................................................................................2

11


Jan Sunvai at Bindapur

The Jury:

Colony. The Jan Sunvai was held with

the objective of hearing the voices of 'Neev ' Delhi FORCES (Forum for

people regarding their struggle to bring Creche and Childcare Services) in

up their young children in the urban collaboration with Delhi Commission

poor settlements of Delhi. for Protection of Child rights (DCPCR)

organized a “Jan Sunvai” on health,

Education, Nutrition, Safety and Care of Mr. Justice A.P. Shah, former Chief Justice

Women and Children in the Urban poor of Delhi High Court

Settlements of Delhi”. The Jan Sunvai was

Mr. M.M. Vidyarthi, Member DCPCRheld in Bindapur resettlement area and

involved two other slum areas of Dr. Vandana Prasad, Convener, Public West Delhi – Shadipur and Krishna Health Resource network.

Among the government officials present

during the Jan Sunvai were Dr. Kalpana

and Dr. Khosla from the Directorate of

Health Services and Mr. A.K. Kanaujia,

Junior engineer, Delhi Jal Board West,

IIIrd Zone.

A Total of 12 cases were presented from

three slums, 5 cases were from Krishna

Colony, Uttam Nagar (an unauthorized

slum) 4 from Bindapur (Resettlement

Colony) and 3 from Shadipur, a 45 year

old unauthorized colony. A profile of

each area was presented by the NGO

representatives who provided information

on the status of basic services in the

area. After the 12 cases participants

were invited to use the occasion to bring

up any pressing problem that required

Jan Sunvai/ Public Hearing

12


to be redressed. The Jury heard another On inquiry by the Investigating Officer

four such cases in an open session. it was found that the girl and the

accused (Shabnam and Himesh Kumar The Jury interacted with each petitioner,

–named changed) got married with the asked for additional information from

permission of the complainant and the representatives of the community

accuser's first wife at a mandir. The who were present and then gave its

Commission did not find the ATR recommendations. A Report Card had been

satisfactory and asked the concerned prepared on the previous two Jan Sunvai's

p a r t i e s t o a p p e a r b e f o r e t h e to serve as a ready reference for the Jury

Commission.to enable them to get a wider glimpse

of the situation prevailing in the urban In June 2011, the mother of the girl

poor settlements of Delhi. It also facilitated child, along with the neighbor

a rapid gap analysis between what services appeared before the concerned

were available and were urgently required member and reiterated her position

by people. that they did not want action against

Himesh Kumar. The Investigating

Officer (IO) PS, Khyala also appeared

Rape Case of a minor girl by employer, FIR before the Chairperson, DCPCR and

registered submitted relevant documents related

to the case and admitted that the FIR i) In a gruesome incident, a factory owner

was not registered till then because the allegedly raped a 13 year old girl for

complainant did not want any action in past one and a half years. The incident

the matter. This submission left many was reported in the Asian Age and as

ques t ions unanswered , so the per the report the incident drew

Commission conducted inquiry into attention when the girl's health started

the matter to find out the facts of the deteriorating. The Commission took

case and the reason for non-registration initiative to ensure that the girl got

of FIR in such a serious matter. justice. Accordingly a notice was issued

Mr. Jaipal Singh and Mr. Manish to the Deputy Commissioner of Police,

Bhatnagar, the Investigator and West District, to submit a detailed

Consultant respectively, came to the Action Taken Report (ATR). The report

conclusion that the victim's family was mentioned that the girl was pregnant

pressurized to withdraw the case and and the employer who raped her was

the SHO of the PS did not register FIR already married to some other woman.

Selected Cases of Interventions

13


under influence. After the intervention a t t i t u d e o f t h e m e d i c a l a n d

of the Commission, not only SHO was paramedical staff to deal with the

transferred but also FIR was registered. p a t i e n t s w h o a r e o p t i n g f o r

institutional delivery rather than

delivery at home in order to create

confidence for the hospitals and

M a t e r n i t y C a r e C e n t r e s a n d ii) Several instances were reported by the

recommended review of the entire media for not providing maternity

a r r a n g e m e n t a n d a p p r i s e t h e facilities to pregnant women by the

Commission of strategies and action hospital administration and turning

plan for future to reduce non-them out of hospital. As a result they

institutional deliveries.are forced to deliver the babies in open

and outside hospitals. These were iii)

b r o u g h t t o t h e k n o w l e d g e o f

Commission. First case is from Guru

Govind Singh Hospital on 15 October Om 18 April 2011 Times of India

2011, Raghubir Nagar the second from reported that a 10 year old migrant

Satyawadi Raja Harish Chandra child working in beedi/bindi making

Hospital on 25 October 2011 and third unit died after being allegedly beaten

was from Ambedkar Hospital on 11 up by his employer. The boy was about

July 2011. to be buried on Sunday morning when

an alert cemetery caretaker informed Taking serious note of the issue

the police. It was also reported that the Commission wrote to the Secretary

Kalemullah the owner of the beedi unit (Medical), Government of Delhi

was absconding.bringing to their notice that such

stray incidents were maligning the The Commission through the media

image of the Government and report took notice of the fact that the

hospitals and that such mishandling District Task force for Rescue of Child

by the hospitals endanger the Labour being constituted under the

neonatal care, childhood/infant order of Hon'ble Delhi High Court had

i l lness , immunizat ion etc . The miserably failed in complying with the

Commission suggested that lot has to orders of the Court

be done to improve the capacity, The Commission took serious note of

augment the facilities and change the the issue and wrote to office of Deputy

Women giving birth outside the

hospital

Factory Owner beats 10 year old to

death

14


Commissioner, District Task Force on issue seriously and issued a notice to

Child Labour, North West District, the Principal of the school on 14

K h a n j h a w l a , a n d D e p u t y December 2011. Commission received

Commissioner of Police, (North-West a reply from CBSE on 24 December

District), Police Station Ashok Vihar to 2011. The school in its reply to

inquire into the matter and take Commission wrote that the child was

appropriate action and submit a not enrolled in school and her name

detailed report before the Commission was not sponsored to CBSE for

after drawing an FIR by 16 May 2011. appearing in the class XII examination.

The activities of the school such as On 2 June 2011 Office of Additional

compartment examination, non Commissioner of Police, Vigilence

declaration of result and issuing of informed the Commission that the

mark sheet till date and collection of matter was enquired through ACP,

fees for class XII for 12 months showed Ashok Vihar. After enquiry a case vide

clear violation of right of the child for under various sections of IPC, JJ Act

not continuing her education.a n d B o n d e d L a b o u r S y s t e m

(Abolition)Act was registered in Observing the facts the Commission

P.S. bharat Nagar and investigation instructed the Education Department

taken up. All the four accused to issue direction to the school

were arrested during the course of authority for appropriate action on

investigation and were sent to judicial priority basis. Examination in-charge

custody. All ACPs/ Sub Division and CBSE was also requested to expedite

SHOs of the District were briefed to the sponsoring of child for class XII

take immediate action. examination.

Quick action was taken by the iv)

Education Department to see that the The Commission received a complaint

child was issued admit card to appear on 12 December 2011 that a student

in the Board Exams. named Nupur Tyagi of Rosary Sr. Sec.

v)School was not only harassed by the

school but was not allowing her to

attend the class. It also did not sponsor The complainant mother wrote to the

her for examination of class XII for the Commission on 15 July 2011 that

year 2011-12. The Commission took the her two sons were students in

Harassment of Student

Charging of Fees from a student

admitted under EWS Quota

15


Sant Nirankari Public School, Avatar attend the school. The complainant

Enclave, New Delhi. The elder son was resorted to the Commission for

student of class 3 under EWS quota and redressal.

younger one was granted admission in T h e C o m m i s s i o n v i e w e d t h e

pre-primary class on concessional fees. allegations made in the complaint

The school authority said that only one seriously and violative of section 3, 8

child was entitled for freeship and that and 12(1) © of RTE Act 2009 and

the other child can only be granted directed the Directorate of education to

concession in the fee. But the school look into the issue seriously. Soon after

authorities demanded fees of Rs. 4100 both the children were allowed to

and interest of Rs. 400 each for both her attend the school from 18 August 2011

sons. The complainant faced financial and the complainant mother was

hardship and was not in position to verbally assured that both her sons

make payments to the school. The would be exempted from the fees.

school was not allowing her sons to

16


i) HIV/AIDS

ii)Report on Female Foeticide

Mrs. Zeeshana Khan and Member Sh.

Shashank Shekhar on Female Foeticide Detailed mapping of Children who are

in August, 2011. The objective of the infected and affected with HIV-AIDS in

study was:-Delhi was conducted by Aradhya,

a) To determine ways to improve the sex supported by Delhi Commission for

ratio of the girl child.Protection of Child Rights, Delhi. The

report included the current state of affairs b) To ensure effective implementation of

in India as far as AIDS is concerned and PC & PNDT Act vis a vis misuse of

highlights that 3.8 percent of the HIV ultrasound machine to propagate sex

population in the country infected are determination.

children and are mostly infected through c) To strengthen and address the issue of parent to child transmission. It also

Female Foeticide and Girl Child focuses on real life case studies of the HIV Protection through involvement of victims and the issues faced by them. Civil Society and Department of

The mapping process helped in Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of

understanding the situation of children NCT of Delhi.

infected and affected by HIV/AIDS. It d) T o e x p l o r e t h e r o l e s a n d also lists the impediments restricting

responsibilities of the various children living with HIV to access the organizations such as public-private existing health care facilities. The study partnership, the civil society including aimed at mainstreaming the Children medical practitioners, academicians living with HIV to various health and and the researchers working in this allied state run programme.field.

The study was completed and submitted The Commission made the following to the Commission. As follow-up of study broad recommendations:-the Government of Delhi started scheme

of financial assistance to people infected A) Enforcement & Legal Advocacy. and affected with HIV/AIDS. Effective implementation of the PC &

PNDT Act the Medical Termination of

Pregnancy Act, the Child Marriage A study was compiled by Member Prohibition Act and other relevant

Studies and Reports

17


legislation. If required, the state may o t h e r e q u i p m e n t c a p a b l e o f

opt for amendment in such legislations determining of sex of the foetus or any

to combat the declining sex ratio and other portable equipment capable of

other existing challenges. being used as above.

B) Social Advocacy. Create awareness E) Data collection, establishment of

among people against the social evil of Registry and Preservation of Data. Use

female foeticide and rights of the girl of machines, including ultrasound or

child. imaging or scanner machines or any

o t h e r e q u i p m e n t , c a p a b l e o f C) Religious Advocacy. Remove the

determining sex of the foetus under present mental block with respect to

the PC & PNDT Act and the MTP Act.social recognition of girl child through

religious manuscripts, books and F) Transparency and fixation of legal

clerics. responsibility in case of violations of

the provisions of the PC & PNDT Act, D) Scientific up-gradation of machines

MTP Act and Child Marriage involved including ultrasound or

Prohibition Act.imaging or scanner machines or any

18


Financial Statement

19


20


21


22


23


24


25


Annexure

27

Sr.No. Concerned rescue police date through children produced employers in which restored/ children/ wise

area SDM station which information rescued before against recovery of repatriated cases follow totalreceived CWC whom Rs.20000/- to family up with

FIR Regd. effected source state

District and Date of Concerned Letter No. and No. of Whether No. of No. of cases Children No. of District

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 DC (EAST)

SDM (Gandhi Nagar) 04.04.11 Geeta Colony Labour/2011/1020-1021

dt.10.06.11

--Do-- 21.06.11 Geeta Colony No.F.15(17)/SDM/GN/Bonded 04 Yes 01 00 04 -----Labour/2011/2257-58 dt.15.09.11

SDM 18.04.11 Jagatpuri No.SDM/PV/5662 (Preet Vihar) dt.22.08.12 15 Yes 07 ----- 15

--Do-- 26.05.11 Gazipur No.SDM/PV/5662 dt.22.08.12 04 Yes 01 04 04

--Do-- 26.05.11 Gazipur No.SDM/PV/5662 dt.22.08.12 11 Yes 05 11 11

--Do-- 09.08.11 Shakarpur No.SDM/PV/5662 dt.22.08.12 18 Yes 11 ----- 18

--Do-- 16.03.12 Khureji Khas No.SDM/PV/5662 dt.22.08.12 18 Yes 10 18 ----- -----

2 DC (West)

SDM 27.05.11 Kirti Nagar No.F.9(1)/Misc/Lab/WD/2009/(Rajouri Garden) 9202 dt.30.12.11

Asstt. Labour Comm (West) 05 Yes 05 02 05 -----

--Do-- 06.06.11 Rajouri Garden No.F.9(1)/Misc/Lab/WD/2009/9202 dt.30.12.11 Asstt. Labour Comm (West) 05 Yes 04 01 ----- -----

--Do-- 06.09.11 Kirti Nagar No.F.9(1)/Misc/Lab/WD/2009/9202 dt.30.12.11 Asstt. Labour Comm (West) 11 Yes 04 02 11 -----

SDM 30.04.11 Not mentioned As per SDM's statement in (Punjabi Bagh) Commission's meeting

dt.17.08.10 09 ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

No.F.15(17)/SDM/GN/Bonded 10 Yes 05 00 10 -----

DELHI COMMISSION FOR PROTECTION OF CHILD RIGHTSDETAILS OF CHILDREN RESCUED

The statement has been prepared on the basis of information received from offices of Dy. Commissioner

From 1st April 2011 to 31st March 2012

--Do-- 09.06.11 Not mentioned As per SDM's statement in Commission's meeting dt.17.08.10 31 ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

--Do-- 06.06.11 Nangloi No.F.9(1)/Misc/Lab/WD/2009/9202 dt.30.12.11 of Asstt. Labour Comm (West) 08 Yes 06 04 08 -----

--Do-- 15.06.11 Not mentioned As per SDM's statement in Commission's meeting dt.17.08.10 29 ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

--Do-- 14.09.11 Mundka No.F.1(1)/SDM/PB/2011/6048-55 dt.14.09.11 56 ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

--Do-- 02.09.11 Nihal Vihar No.F.1(1)/SDM/PB/2012/1523 dt.20.03.12 04 ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

--Do-- 30.11.11 Rajdhani Park No.F.1(1)/SDM/PB/2012/1523 dt.20.03.12 15 ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

--Do-- 02.03.12 Qamarruddin No.F.1(1)/SDM/PB/2012/1523 Nagar dt.20.03.12 03 ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

SDM 06.06.11 Hari Nagar F.SDM(RG)/06/DTF/ 2012/(Rajouri Garden) 2127 dt.26.02.13 05 ----- ----- 01 ----- -----

--Do-- 28.10.11 Rajouri Garden F.SDM(RG)/06/DTF/ 2012/2127 dt.26.02.13 01 ----- 01 ----- ----- -----

--Do-- 21.12.11 Kirti Nagar F.SDM(RG)/06/DTF/ 2012/2127 dt.26.02.13 01 ----- 01 ----- ----- -----



3 DC (North)

SDM 13.04.11 Sadar Bazar FSDM(SB)/Child Labour/Misc/(Sadar Bazar) 22/2011/6679 dt.13.12.11 14 Yes 06 ----- ----- -----

--Do-- 15.06.11 Sarai Rohilla FSDM(SB)/Child Labour/Misc/22/2011/6679 dt.13.12.11 04 Yes ----- ----- ----- -----

--Do-- 01.12.11 Sadar Bazar FSDM(SB)/Child Labour/Misc/22/2011/6679 dt.13.12.11 08 Yes 04 ----- ----- -----

-Do- 17.01.12 Sarai Rohilla F.10(60)/Misc./Ch.Lab./DC(N)/10/2815 dt.16.08.12 2 Yes 2

SDM 02.09.11 Roop Nagar F.10(60)/Misc./Ch.Lab./DC(N)/(Civil Lines) 10/2815 dt.16.08.12 24 Yes 5 03

-Do- 16.07.11 Tibti Market F.10(60)/Misc./Ch.Lab./DC(N)/10/2815 dt.16.08.12 14 Yes 5 01

-Do- 20.09.11 Roop Nagar F.10(60)/Misc./Ch.Lab./DC(N)/10/2815 dt.16.08.12 24 Yes 5 07

-Do- 23.12.11 Burari F.10(60)/Misc./Ch.Lab./DC(N)/10/2815 dt.16.08.12 4 Yes 1 -----

4 DC (North-East)

SDM 19.04.11 Jafrabad F/PA/DC/NE/2011/322 (Seelampur) & Bhajanpura dt.05.05.11 08 Yes 04 02 ----- -----

--Do-- 25.04.11 Bhajanpura F/PA/DC/NE/2011/322 dt.05.05.11 11 Yes 06 00 ----- -----

--Do-- 01.06.11 Seelampur F.No.SDM/S.pur/Bonded Labour/11/6863 dt.07.02.11 21 Yes 06 21 ----- -----

--Do-- 15.09.11 Khajoori Khas F.No.8(9)/SDM/S.Pur/Bonded Labour/11/5824 dt.05.10.11 21 Yes 07 09 ----- -----

--Do-- 23.11.11 Khajoori Khas F.No.SDM/S.pur/Bonded Labour/11/6863 dt.07.02.11 02 Yes 02 02 ----- -----

SDM 17.07.11 Seemapuri F.No.SDM/S.Pur/Bonded (Seemapuri) Labour/11/6863 dt.07.02.11 08 Yes 07 08 ----- -----

--Do-- 07.09.11 GTB Seemapuri, F.No.8(9)/SDM/S.Pur/Bonded Nand Nagri Labour/11/5854 dt.05.10.11 10 Yes 05 09 ----- -----

SDM 10.08.11 Jyoti Nagar F.No.SDM/S.pur/Bonded (Shahdara) Labour/11/6863 dt.07.02.11 07 Yes 06 07 ----- -----

--Do-- 29.09.11 Welcome F.No.SDM/S.pur/Bonded Labour/11/6863 dt.07.02.11 22 Yes 13 22 ----- -----

--Do-- 08.08.11 Khajuri Khas F.SDM/S.Pur/Bonded Labours/2012/2498 dt.31.07.12 06 ----- 01 00 ----- -----

SDM 22.02.12 Seemapuri F.SDM/S.Pur/Bonded (Seemapuri) Labours/2012/2498

dt.31.07.12 06 Yes 05 06 ----- -----

SDM 25.02.11 Welcome F.SDM/S.Pur/Bonded Labours/(Shahdara) 2012/2498 dt.31.07.12 07 Yes 03 07 ----- -----

SDM 21.12.11 Seema Puri F.SDM/Spuri/Child Labour/(Seemapuri) 20143/1346 dt.02.03.13 10 Yes 06 10 ----- -----

5 DC (North-West)

SDM 02.11.11 Subhash Palace F/SDM/MT/2012/2503 (Model Town) dt.18.08.12 11 Yes ----- ----- -----

--Do-- 22.11.11 Subhash Palace F/SDM/MT/2012/2503 dt.18.08.12 02 Yes ----- ----- -----

--Do-- 27.12.11 Keshav Puram F/SDM/MT/2012/2503 dt.18.08.12 23 Yes ----- ----- -----

--Do-- 07.09.11 Jahangirpuri F/SDM/MT/2012/2503 dt.18.08.12 17 Yes ----- ----- -----

--Do-- 03.05.11 Mangolpuri F.1/1/SDM(SV)/Misc./2012/3307 dt.14.09.12 17 Yes 168/11 17

--Do-- 19.05.11 Aman Vihar F.1/1/SDM(SV)/Misc./2012/3307 dt.14.09.12 44 Yes 152/11 44 .

--Do-- 11.06.11 Aman Vihar F.1/1/SDM(SV)/Misc./2012/3307 dt.14.09.12 32 Yes 175/11 32

--Do-- 26.07.11 Kanjhawala F.1/1/SDM(SV)/Misc./2012/3307 dt.14.09.12 19 Yes 181/11 19

--Do-- 29.08.11 K.N.Katju Marg F.1/1/SDM(SV)/Misc./2012/3307 dt.14.09.12 01 Yes 364/11 01

--Do-- 04.10.11 Mangolpuri F.1/1/SDM(SV)/Misc./2012/3307 dt.14.09.12 20 Yes 421/11 20

--Do-- 04.10.11 Sultanpuri F.1/1/SDM(SV)/Misc./2012/3307 dt.14.09.12 33 Yes 463/11 33

--Do-- 05.01.12 K.N.Katju Marg F.1/1/SDM(SV)/Misc./2012/3307 dt.14.09.12 01 Yes 9/12 01

--Do-- 17.01.12 Aman Vihar F.1/1/SDM(SV)/Misc./2012/3307 dt.14.09.12 10 Yes 17/12 1 10

--Do-- 14.03.12 Aman Vihar F.1/1/SDM(SV)/Misc./2012/3307 dt.14.09.12 20 Yes 20

6 DC (South)

SDM (Defence 19.09.11 Sunlight Colony No.F.SDM(DC)/S.Child/11445 Colony) dt.16.11.11 02 Yes ----- ----- ----- -----

--Do-- 21.09.11 Sunlight Colony No.F.SDM(DC)/S.Child/11445 dt.16.11.11 26 Yes ----- ----- ----- -----

--Do-- 27.09.11 Hazrat No.F.SDM(DC)/S.Child/11445 Nizamuddin dt.16.11.11 01 Yes ----- ----- ----- -----

--Do-- 05.10.11 Jamia Nagar No.F.SDM(DC)/S.Child/11445 dt.16.11.11 01 Yes ----- ----- ----- -----

--Do-- 17.11.11 Defence Colony No.F.SDM(DC)/S.Child/1260-62 dt.08.02.11 01 Yes ----- ----- ----- -----

--Do-- 16.01.12 Nizamuddin No.F.SDM(DC)/S.Child/995 dt.02.02.12 06 ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

--Do-- 20.01.12 Lodi Colony No.F.SDM(DC)/S.Child/995 dt.02.02.12 06 ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

SDM (Defence 09.03.12 New Friends No. F.SDM(DC)/S. Child/Colony) Colony 7851-53 dt.23.04.12 01 Yes

7 DC (Central)

SDM 30.05.11 IP Estate F.SDM/DG/CRO/2011/1742-46 (Daryaganj) dt.7.6.11 12 Yes ----- ----- ----- -----

--Do- 06.02.12 Jama Masjid F.SDM/DG/CRO/2012/8920 dt.13.02.12 04 Yes ----- ----- ----- -----

SDM 31.05.11 Karol Bagh F.4/SDM/KB/2011/CLR/(Karol Bagh) 10120-25 dt.31.05.11 06 Yes ----- ----- ----- -----

SDM 21.04.11 Nabi Karim Letter No. office Dy. No.1775 (Paharganj) dt.03.10.11 34 Yes 04 00 ----- -----

--Do-- 06.07.11 Nabi Karim Letter No. office Dy. No.1775 dt.03.10.11 29 Yes 06 00 ----- -----

SDM 13.12.11 DBG Road F.4/SDM/(KB)/CLRO/2011/(Karol Bagh) 4504 dt.17.08.12 03 Yes ----- ----- ----- -----

8 DC (New Delhi)

SDM 26.11.10 Barakhamba F.No.DC/ND/Child lab/09/855 (Connaught dt.04.4.11 08 Yes 03 00 08 00Palace)

--Do-- 22.07.11 Barakhamba SDM (CP)'s letter no.6762 dt. 24.11.11 08 Yes 04 02 08 00

--Do-- 22.09.11 Barakhamba SDM (CP)'s letter no.6762 dt. 24.11.11 04 Yes 04 00 04 00

SDM 01.04.11 Parliament Street SDM (CP)'s letter no.6762 (Parliament dt. 24.11.11 03 Yes 01 00 03 00Street)

--Do-- 01.04.11 Mandir Marg SDM (CP)'s letter no.6762 dt. 24.11.11 05 Yes 04 00 05 00

--Do-- 22.07.11 Mandir Marg SDM (CP)'s letter no.6762 dt. 24.11.11 03 Yes 03 03 03 00

SDM 17.02.12 Vasant Vihar F.DC/ND/Child Lab./2012/(Vasant Vihar) 13916 dated 08.02.13 11 Yes 01 ----- 11

--Do-- 25.02.12 South Campus F.DC/ND/Child Lab./2012/13916 dated 08.02.13 02 Yes 01 ----- 02

Total Number of children rescued = 924

Number of Cases in which recovery of Rs. 20,000 = 148

FIR Lodged against the employer = 202

Number of Children Restored/Repatriated to family = 294

Number of Children/cases follow up with source state = 48

dcpcr annual report 2011-12 english final

Documents