d.c. 20008 bibliography of american-published geology · 2011-02-20 · publication in american...
TRANSCRIPT
PUBLICATION IN AMERICAN GEOLOGY TO 1850
Robert Hazen
Carnegie Instiutution of Washington Geophysical Laboratory 2801 Upton Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20008
Abstract
Activity in American earth science increased at an exponential rate from 1780 through 1850, on the basis of the number of geologic publications recorded in the Bibliography of American-Published Geology: 1669 to 1850. Subdisciplines of earth science, such as vertebrate paleontology, mineralogy, and field mapping, grew in a regular succession of stages. At first, publication was sporadic because natural phenomena were observed but not understood in a larger framework. A key work, such as a new theory or classification scheme that succeeded in unifying isolated observations, stimulated a period of exponential increase in activity as many researchers were shown a clear direction to pursue. In some fields , the publication rate eventually slowed down and then reached zero as the objectives of a research tradition were met or a new competing program was more successful. The overall exponential increase of activity in geology was the net result of several subdisciplines being in various stages of growth.
Key Words: History of Geology, Geology-literature and libraries.
Introduction A hallmark of Western science
for the past three hundred years has been a steady increase in activity of the scientific community . Price (1961, 1963) developed a method to characterize .and quantify this scientific activity by analyzing the number of ,published references, authors, or
as a measurement of the h of science. This tech-called bibliometrics, can be
ed to early American geo-. With the 14,000 entries in Bibliography of American
",,~,HQlhDri Geology: 1669 to 1850 and Hazen, 1976, 1980) as
data base, one can investigate fast and in what stages earth
grew in America. Other factors besides publica
including private correspondence, scientific meetings, .advanced education, and outside funding, are also of obvious importance in assessing the nature
scientific activity. Furtherin certain aspects of
science, particularly those relating to technological developments and scientific apparatus, the published literature may not be an adequate guide to advancements. In spite of these additional factors in measuring the activity of the scientific community, publication (the permanent record of scientific achievements) can be used as a
sensitive measure of scientific effort.
Before quantifying scientific effort one should examine what types of activities are represented in geologic publications. Many authors engaged in original research and contributed new data, new facts, or new hypotheses. Many publications such as textbooks and book reviews contain syntheses of information from other sources. A large number of popular articles and books on earth science, which appeared in America after 1820, reflect attempts of scientists to disseminate geologic information to the general public. The many facetSof scientific activity should be kept in mind when viewing the simple growth curves of the subsequent sections.
The activity of geologic research has been measured by counting the number of articles, books, maps, and other works relating to earth science published in America versus time. No attempt has been made to weight the relative significance of these publications; such an attempt at weighting would violate the inherent objectivity of the bibliometric method. Each of the 14,000 entries in the Bibliography of American-Published Geology: 1669 to 1850 has thus been counted as one publication in the following illustrations.
The number of earth science publications versus date is illustrated in Figures 1a and lb. Before 1800, publication was sporadic. A few chance events such as the New England earthquakes of 1727 and 1755, and occasional periodical volumes controlled the rate of publication. Geology articles appeared regularly only after 1780. By 1800, however, the annual publication level grew rapidly and in 1850 almost 1000 references are to be found. The cumulative growth of American earth science is perhaps best illustrated by a semi-logarithmic plot of number of references versus year (Figure 2). The cumulative total of references closely approximates an ideal exponential curve, with a doubling rate of ten years; between 1780 and 1850, each decade saw the production of a volume of geologic literature equal to all that had been produced before.
A similar rate of increase is seen in the number of Americans who published earth science books, articles or maps per year from 1780 through 1850 (Figure 3). The number of named authors in a given year may be significantly less than the number of publications due to unsigned works, foreign authors, and multiple publications by a single author. The period of doubling for
Journal of Geological Education, 1980, v. 28, P 249
. , .' ,
I.
\ ,
.,.
, , . '.
"
50~----------------------------------------------------~
Medical Repository, Vol. 1- 1798 ~
fI) 40 c 0 -0
AAAS Memoirs, Vol. 1-1785 U
30 \ .D
:::J a. -0 ... ~ E :::J
Z
800
fI)
§ 600 -o U
.D :::J a. _400 o ~
Q)
.D E :::J
Z 200
20
10 f-
APS Transactions, Vol. 1-1771
Boston Earthquake- 1755"
Boston Earthquake-1727,
O~~~~~ ____ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ffi __ ~~fl~a~m~h~~_~~~~~",~~~~ 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740 1760 1780
Date of publication
Monthly American Journal of Geology, 1831-32
American Journal of Science, 1818-1850
American Mineralogical \
\ Journal, 1810-1814
\
Date of publication
1800
Figure 1. Number of American-published earth science books, pamphlets, maps, and periodical articles versus time. (a) 1660-1800, (b) 1800-1850. Note that the vertical scale of Ib is fifteen times greater than 1a.
Journal of Geological Education, 1980, v. 28 , P 250
the yearly (not cumulative) number of geologic authors is approximately 15 years, which is significantly shorter than the 24-year doubling period of the American population. The proportion of Americans who published geologic studies, therefore, increased dramatically in the first half of the nineteenth century from 4 to 13 named authors per million population in the United States (Figure 4).
The exponential increase in geologic activity represented in Figures 1 through 4, though striking, has been typical of all Western science for nearly three centuries. Price (1963) illustrates similar growth in nu mbers of periodicals, abstracts, authors, and universities. Typical doubling periods for other sciences have been 10 to 15 years. The growth of science thus far has outpaced the increase in world population. As emphasized by Price, such rapid growth cannot be maintained indefinitely.
The Mechanism of Scientific Growth
One way to understand why activity in geology grew exponentially is to examine the development of individual subdisciplines. One such subset of geologic investigations is mapping based on field studies. The number of geologic maps produced in the United States per decade, shown in Figure 5, is a clear example of an exponential increase. The reason for this rapid growth is the dominant influence of the map of William Maclure (1809), which set an example for subsequent authors to follow. At a time when few authors cited any previous literature, virtually all mappers in the twenty years after Maclure credit him. Maclure's map was a key work that established a new research tradition in the United States. (European geologists of the time were well aware of geologic mapping, but in . America Maclure's map was the first widely recognized model.)
The idea of a key work establishing a research tradition is also apparent in early American vertebrate paleontology (Figure. 6). Before 1820 publication was sporadic. As unusual fossil bones were discovered they were publicized, but fossils were not described in any systematic way, for there was' no well known
10,000 CUMULATIVE TOTAL
OF GEOLOGICAL REFERENCES vs
I/) TIME
Q) 4,000 u c: Q) ... Q) -Q)
a:: -0
0 - 1,000 0 t-Q)
> -0 :;
400 E :::J •
U
100P=~~----~----~--~----~----L---~ 1810 1820 1830 1840
Year
Figure 2. Cumulative total of American geologic references versus time. The vertical scale is logarithmic. The solid line represents doubling every ten years.
300
25
~ 20 o ~
:; ct '0 15 ... Q)
.0 E ~ 10
0,-
OI-
0 I--
0 r-
50 -
o 1780
NUMBER OF AUTHORS vs -
YEAR OF PUBLICATION
l-
1-
1-
-.It
n .ltfJ'fHfIH ibn II IIIUnnU':
1790 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 Year
Figure 3. Number of named American earth science authors versus year of publication. The number doubles every ten years.
Journal of Geological Education, 1980, v. 28, P 251
, "
I
"
t'
14
12 c 0 -°10 :;, a. 0 a..
w 8 0
.... Q) 6 a. .... Q)
..c 4 E :;, z
2
0
NUMBER OF EARTH SCIENTISTS PER 106 POPULAT ION
1800 1810 1820 Year
1830 1840 1850
Figure 4. Number of named American earth science authors per million population versus time.
GEOLOGICAL MAPS 50
:::::::;:::::::::::::
:::tt{
40 en
t~{{ I-
~I~~ c 0 - j:jjJ 0 u
.c 30 :::J
r- :::':::::::::::::::::
::::~~fffffff a.. :'::: :::::::: -0 ~ 20 CI)
.c E
:::::::::::::::::::t::::::::::::::: ; ~ :::(:::::::::::::::::::::
':':':,:':':
:::J Z
10 f- :':':, :':,:,
:::::
o 1810 1820 1830 1840
Year of Publication
Figure 5. Number of published geologic maps versus time.
classification scheme for organic remains. George Cuvier's Essay on the Theory of the Earth, published in an American edition in 1818, was perhaps the first work to present systematic paleontology to America. It seems more than coincidental that the .exponential rise in studies of vertebrate (and invertebrate) fossils. followed shortly after the publication of Cuvier's text.
Not all fields show continuously increasing publication rates. Medical topography, introduced in America by Samuel Latham Mitchill (1799), was the study of the relationship between types of bedrock and the prevalence of disease. An important conclusion of medical topography was that calcareous terrains make more healthy places to live than those underlain by argillaceous sediments (Hazen, 1978, Chapter 3). The number of studies in medical topography grew rapidly in the first decades of the nineteenth century (Figure 7). Physicians and naturalists (especially those from calcareous regions of New York and near Cincinnati) published many local studies based on Mitchill's ideas. By the 1840's, however, the ideas of medical topography were no longer widely accepted, and a sharp drop in the number of studies is seen. This pattern of a key publication, followed by an exponential rise in number of investigations, a plateau, and an eventual tailing off is a commonly recurrent sequence in the development of science.
Descriptive mineralogy provides yet another example of subdiscipline growth in American earth science (Figure 8), but the pattern .. here is more complex . The overall trend is a rapid increase in number of yearly publications, but there are definite spurts of activity following the publication of what were perhaps the three most important American mineralogy texts prior to 1850. The steep rises just before 1800, 1820, and 1840 correspond to American publication of the Compendious System of Mineralogy (Anon., 1794), Cleaveland's (1816) Elementary Treatise on Mineralogy and Geology, and Dana's (1837) System of Mineralogy. The Compendious System, based in part on a work by Swedish mineralogist Axel Cronstedt, was the first systematic classification of minerals published in the United States. It
Journal of Geological Education, 1980, v. 28, P 252
is not clear whether it spurred the growth of American mineralogy by providing a standard of reference, or whether it merely reflected the new-found interest of Philadelphia chemists in mineralogy (Green and Burke, 1978). Cleaveland's Treatise was extremely influential. This first American-authored mineral system used a combination of chemical and physical tests for mineral identification that were well suited for application by American researchers. Dana's System, a third key work, combined chemical, physical and crystallographic properties of minerals into a system of classification which met with overwhelming success and is still in use today. Once again the key work was followed by a period of great publication activity as new workers learned and applied the classification scheme.
In the preceding discussion, key publications, rather than key events, have been emphasized as stimulating scientific activity. Unusual phenomena or events commonly result in temporary surges of publications. Great numbers of pamphlets appeared following the eighteenth century New England earthquakes (Figure la), for example, and the midnineteenth century discovery of gold in California triggered another wave of topical publications. Events by themselves, however, do not generally inspire the exponential rise of effort seen following key works. Any startling natural event or discovery must first be interpreted in the light of existing research traditions. Should a new key idea be inspired by the event then a new research tradition may begin, but lacking such a key publication, interest in the event will quickly pass.
The first manned lunar landing is an example of an event that inspired much new research, but did not, by itself, result in exponential growth. Virtually all lunar research was approached initially from the standpoint of wellestablished (j .e. fundable) research traditions. In fact, one of the major rationales for studying
• the moon was to provide data on the origin and evolution of the earth. Scientists thus seem constrained to approach new events from the standpoint of existing research objectives and concepts.
VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY 120r-----------------------------------------,
100
IJ)
~ 80
o U
..0
~ 60 -o ... Q,)
..0 40 E ~ z
20
1790 1800 IBIO 1820 1830 1840 Year of Publication
Figure 6. Number of publications on vertebrate paleontology versus time, 1780-1850. Publication was sporadic until after the key work of Cuvier (1818).
MEDICAL TOPOGRAPHY 12
10 f- -If) .. c: 0 ::::::':'. - 8 I- -0 u
f- -.0 ::J
CL 6 I- -..-0
~ -~
Q)
.0 4 l-E ::J
~ z 2 f-
:::::;
0 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840
Yeor of Publicotion
Figure 7. Number of publications on medical topography versus time, 1790-1850. An exponential increase followed by a decline in publication rate is shown.
Journal of Geological Education, 1980, v. 28, p 253
. , '
, ,'
; .1
, :
: . , ,
"
I,
, '\
DESCRIPTIVE MINERALOGY 180~------------------------------------~
160-
140-
120 f-III c: 0 -0
t u
.c 100f- t ::J t a.
~::: .... Dono's 0 t
"- 80 - k: System GI [: (1837) .c E
Cleaveland's ~:::
\ ::J
Z Treatise (1816) 60 -
40 f-
Compendious System 20 r-- (l794)
~ o ~I .
1790
""" rmtry!:::;I: 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840
Year of publication
research tradition or the success of new competing programs. This mature period in the development of a subdiscipline is often a time when technological applications of the field are pursued.
(5) A few last proponents of any research tradition keep working after most others have changed directions. These last proponents, though often prominent scientists, may have little impact on the course of science.
Conclusions
The growth of early American geology was apparently the net result of overlapping research programs. At any given time the many subdisciplines of the earth sciences may have been in different stages of growth, but the sum of these efforts was steady, exponential increase in activity. Does this growth model hold today? Certainly the curve of key works, rapid growth, saturation, and eventual decline of subdisciplines is still valid in the earth sciences. Modern examples of subdisciplines which have progressed through at least two of the various stages of growth are plate tectonics, paleoecology, descriptive mineralogy, and isotope geochemistry. Extrapolation of data in Figure 1 to 1980, however, implies an absurd annual American geological production of
Figure 8. Number of publications in descriptive mineralogy versus time, more than 1,000,000 publi-1780-1850. Three periods of rapid growth are seen following publication cations. (The total number of of key classification schemes in 1794, 1816, and 1837. references in the Bibliography of
Idealized Growth of Science
A recurrent pattern of activity is evident in the development of
. each specific subdiscipline described above. Five growth stages may be recognized in the period from 1660 to 1850: (1) First may come a period of
sporadic observations as in paleontology or miner-alogy. This happens when natural phenomena are observed but are not understood in a larger framework such as a classification scheme.
(2) A key work that presents a new research procedure or classification system marks
(3)
(4)
the true beginning of a research tradition. This work may be largely new (such as Cuvier's Essay) or it may introduce an established concept to a new audience (e.g. Maclure's geologic map). A period of exponential activity follows as many new workers join in adding data and refining the research tradition. This stage of growth may be an exciting time of rapid discovery and development. Growth in activity must slow down and may eventually stop due to completion of the objectives of a
North American Geology for 1978 was less than 50,000.) The exponential growth rate of geologic activity has clearly slowed. Is American earth science entering a period of reduced growth, of leveling off? Analysis of the current activity and directions of the earth sciences may help us to understand and plan the future of geology in America.
Acknowledgements
This paper was first given at the G.K. Gilbert Symposium at the 1979 Annual Meeting of the Geological Society of America in San Diego, California. Many helpful additions and corrections
Journal of Geological Education, 1980, v. 28, P 254
were suggested by Henry Faul, Stephen Gould, Clifford Nelson, Cecil Schneer, George White, and Hatten S. Yoder, Jr.
About .the A.uthor Robert M._ Hazen, experimen
tal mineralogist · at the Carnegie Institution of Washington's Geophysical -Laboratory, received the
-B.8. and , S.M. .in geology ' at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in1971,and the Ph.D. in mineralogy at Harvard University in 1975. Prior to joining the Carnegie Institution he ' was a NATO Fellow at Cambridge University, in. :England. -Hisre-
~search , interests -inclUde high'teJnperature "and high-lpressure -crystallography and the .. crystal chemistry . of < rock-forilling
~ r!iirlerals,_ as we:llasthe<history of North . American-, .• ~eo19gy. .... In
~addition,/_ asa '-par~ 4 time .proies, slOrl~l . ti'J:ltnpeter,Dr;Hazenhas " ~~rf orm E.@' .......... ¥"itti- \flpmerOusen-~seJnbles inClUdlrlg' the Boston -and N'ational y ;8ympnony orchestras.
References Cited
Anonymous, 1794, Compendious System of Mineralogy: Philadelphia, T. Dobson, 505 p.
Cleaveland, P., 1816, An Elementary Treatise on Mineralogy and Geology: Boston, Cummings and Hilliard, 668 p.
Cuvier, G., 1818, Essay on the Theory of the Earth: New York, Kirk and Mercein, 431 p.
Green, J.C., and Burke, J.G., 1978, The science of minerals in the age of Jefferson: American Philosophical Society Transactions 68, part 4,113 p.
Hazen, R.M., 1978, North American Geology; Early Writings: Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 376 p.
Hazen, R.M., and Hazen, M.H., 1976, Bibliography of American-
Published Geology: 1669 to 1850: Geological Society of America, Microform Publication 4, 979 p.
Hazen, R.M., and Hazen, M.H., 1980, American Geological Literature; A Bibliography and Index: Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, 431 p.
Maclure, W., 1809, A map of the United States: in Observations on the geology of the United States: American Philosophical Society Transactions 6, 411-428.
Mitchill, S.L., 1799, Outlines of medical geology: Medical Repository 2, 39-47.
Price, D. de Solla, 1961, Science Since Babylon: New Haven, Connecticut, Yale University Press, 230 p.
Price, D. de Solla, 1963, Little Science, Big Science: New York, Columbia University Press, 119 p.
CLASSROOM MODEL OF A WADATI ZONE
James H. Shea
University of Wisconsin-Parkside Kenosha Wisconsin 53141
Abstract
A plexiglass and aluminum model of a Wadati zone suitable for classroom exercises is described. Use of the model involves locating the appropriate hole in a latitude-longitude grid on top of the model, inserting an aluminum rod to the appropriate scaled depth to represent a particular earthquake hypocenter and following this procedure for many hypocenters. The model can then be viewed from any position around the sides so that the Wadati plane is seen as a line. The model can be easily adapted for other exercises or demonstrations in structural geology, petroleum geology, mineral deposits, etc.
Key words: Apparatus, earth science teaching-laboratory, geophysics-seismology, plate tectonics.
Introduction The Model
Following up on a mathematical and graphical modelling exercise that was developed some years ago (Shea, 1973), I recently developed a threedimensional physical model of Wadati (see Wadati, 1928) zones suitable for classroom use. The model allows students to test the hypothesis that earthquake hypocenters near oceanic trenches tend to
., occur along planes that dip away from the trenches, toward the associated island arc (e.g., the Aleutian Arc) or continental mountain chain (e.g., the Andes Mountains). The procedure followed is relatively simple and yields a result that is visually convincing, yet indicative of observational uncertainty.
The model is basically a box constructed of .25 inch (nominal) (.64 cm) plexiglass sides with a .5 inch (nominal) (1.3 cm) top and no bottom. Plexiglass was chosen because of its strength, easy workability, and transparency. The sides of the box are about 23 inches (58.4 cm) wide and about 24 inches (61 cm) high. The top was made 24 inches (61 cm) square so that it protrudes beyond the sides, thus allowing the sides to be fitted into .25 inch (.64 cm) deep grooves cut into the underside of the top. The top and sides are also bolted to each other by the use of plexiglass blocks as shown in Figure 1. The box can be easily disassembled for storage.
Journal of Geological Education, 1980, v. 28, P 255