DBQ Industrial Revolution

Impacts on Labor(Thesis)

Do now: read hand-out on capitalism, socialism and communism: whatWould the arguments be for or against Industrialism?

Capitalism-Socialism-

Marxismcapitalism socialism MarxismThe forces of supply and demand drivemarkets, as producers move to meeteconomic wants and needs, matching themwith suitable products. Government should“leave the markets alone”, acting only toensure fairness in competition.Basic Ideas:1. private ownership and control of propertyand economic resources,2. free enterprise,3. com petition among businesses,4. freedom of choice and technological progress:invisible hand: serves to self correct market flaws

Capitalism produces a gapbetween rich and poor, andgovernment should act toguarantee that workers aretreated fairly. Governmentshould own and managesome businesses, especiallythose which provide thegreatest public good (healthcare, railroads, etc.)A moderate alternative to free market capitalism

The government should ownand manage all businesses inorder to eliminate the evilsof Capitalism.Workers should unite to seize the means of production (History has been a struggle between the haves and have nots) the government should do this untilOrder is restored and that each will do according to needs and abilities. Preaches no sexism, racism or classism.No competition, no motivation, no risk taking

capitalism Socialism/communismFavors innovation and generation of wealth for more peopleInvisible hand will correct any errorsHard working people will be rewardedCheaper prices for more consumer goodsStandard of living will improveGovernment will not interfere with profits (laissez-faire)Wages improved

Horrible working conditionsChild laborDecline in urban health Bourgeoisie exploitative of proletariat (working urban poor)Another struggle between the “haves” and “have-nots”Patriarchy persists (women received lower wages)Imperialism/racist notion of national superiorityExploitative of land,labor and capital both at home and abroad

Debate about Industrialism

The purpose of the committee was to investigate the mistreatment of child

labor which the document illustrates the long working hours, beatings and lacking of common decency amongst children as young as 10

Sadler: What time did you have for meals? Cooper: We had just one period of forty minutes in the sixteen hours. That was at noon. Sadler: What means were taken to keep you awake? Cooper: At times we were frequently strapped [whipped]. Sadler: When your hours were so long, did you have any time to attend a day school? Cooper: We had no time to go to day school. Sadler: Can you read and write? Cooper: I can read, but I cannot write

You thought you had it bad, this can be grouped politically by the government trying to do something, economically by working conditions or by child exploitation

Doc #1 The following excerpt is from a British industrial worker named William Cooper whotestified before the Sadler Committee in 1832. The Sadler Committee was

investigating the working conditions in British factories

This, grouped along with #2 is a testimonial regarding working conditions in British

factories. This testimony comes from an individual who was told that he has less than a year to live due to the conditions in the factories.

Hebergam: There was about a dozen who died during the two and a half years I was there. At

the L___________ Mill where I worked last, a boy was caught in a machine and both his thigh bones broke and from his knee to his hip the flesh was ripped up the same as if it had been cut by a knife. His hands were bruised, his eyes were nearly torn out and his arms were broken. His sister, who ran to pull him off had both her arms broke and her head bruised. The boy died. I don not know if the girl is dead, but she was not expected to live. Sadler: Did the accident occur because a shaft was not covered? Hebergam: Yes.

This can be grouped by exploitation, economically or politically, and by child labor.

Doc #2 The following excerpt is from Joseph Hebergam another worker who testifiedbefore the Sadler Committee in 1832.

A contradictory view of child labor from # 1 and 2, and identifies the conditions

of labor in the factories. “it is moreover my firm conviction that children would thrive better when employed in our modern factories, than if left home in apartments too often ill-aired, damp and cold.”

Clearly a supporter of the bourgeoisie factory owners and a belief that children are better off working than life in the tenements ( where urbanized poor workers often resided)

Doc #3 The following is an excerpt from Andrew Ure’s book The Philosophy of Manufactures

published in 1835

This speaks ( opposed to the first three documents about

children) to the comforts of industrial life and presents a favorable view( and encourage workers to avoid rioting) “Your houses are better built, your clothes are cheaper, you have an infinite number of domestic utensils. You can travel cheaply from place to place and not only

travel at less expense, but travel ten times quicker than almost two hundred years age.”

Later, there will be attempts by unions and socialist societies to improve conditions of workers and lifestyles , this attempts to argue that life is not so bad after all.

Doc #4 From Charles Knight’s The Working Man’s Companion subtitled The Results of Machinery,

Namely Cheap Production and Increased Employment published in 1831. The book was

intended to instruct workers about the benefits of industrialization after failed political riots in Bristol, England.

This illustrates how conditions were bettered

for children ( perhaps by this very society) “Special regulations, adopted by Mr. Dale, have made this factory very different from the others in this kingdom. Out of the nearly 3000 children employed in the mills from 1785 to 1797,only fourteen have died.”

This can be grouped culturally, under improving conditions or favorably ( but only 14 dies…c’mon is this for real?)

Doc #5 The following description is from a pamphlet, published in 1797, by the Society for

Bettering the Condition and Increasing the Comforts of the Poor

Look at his titles ( politician, economist and

observations of social systems). This may be grouped in multiple ways. This appears to be a favorable overview of the benevolence of bourgeoisie factory owners who bring affordable housing, increased wages and “everywhere is to be observed a cleanliness which indicates order and comfort.”

Doc # 6The following excerpt is from the French politician and economist Leon Faucher. Faucher visited several English cities in 1843 examining their social system

and recorded hisobservations in a book entitled Manchester in 1844.

This socialist ( one who wants government control

over certain industries to make improvements) was a co-author (along with Karl Marx) of the Communist Manifesto. This document illustrates the terrible living conditions in the slums “The streets are usually unpaved, full of holes, filthy and strewn with refuse. Since they have neither gutters nor drains, the refuse accumulates in stagnant, stinking puddles. The view of Manchester is quite typical. The main river is narrow, coal-black and full of stinking filth and rubbish which deposits on the bank … one walks along a very rough path on the river

bank to reach a chaotic group of little one-storey, one room cabins … in front of the doors, filth

and garbage abound” This can be grouped economically, culturally or under living conditions of the

proletariat ( urban poor)

Doc #7 The Conditions of the Working Class in England by the German socialist Friedrich Engels,

published in 1844.

This letter is in response to the use of

machines to remain competitive with other countries and, thereby want economic gain.” scribbling mill, the spinning frame, and the flying shuttle, have reduced manual labor nearly one third, and each of them has at its first introduction carried an alarm to the work people, yet each has contributed to the advance of wages and to increase the trade so that if an attempt was now made to deprive us of the use of them, there is no doubt, but every person engaged in business would exert himself to defend them.”

This can be grouped economically, in favor of industrialism or through the perspective of merchants ( as opposed to politicians, economists or commissions.

Doc #8 Letter from the Leeds Cloth Merchants, 1791, was issued by the Cloth Merchants of the

English city of Leeds. The merchants were replying to a letter criticizing the use of

machines published by the Leeds Woolen Workers

Designed to illustrate the cramped, unsanitary

and inhumane living conditions, this can be grouped with document # 6 or # 7

Document #9 Picture of Manchester

A woman in the textile mills ( bobbin doffers) to illustrate

as either mothers or workers, the working and living conditions in Manchester

A union leader who would often riot or protest the living and working conditions which would eventually bring about change

Karl Marx who wrote along with Engels ( doc #7) and believed that workers should seize the means of production to inspire a workers revolution (internationale)

A Laissez faire parliamentarian whose beliefs that the government should not intervene and, therefore, would support all the positives and none of the negatives

Additional Documents

The working and living conditions of the Industrial

Revolution in England were under scrutiny by governmental commissions, debated by economists over the benefits and detriments and perceived differently by capitalists and socialists alike as to the vast discrepancies of Industrial lifestyles. An additional source from a proletariat’s ( urban working class poor) diary might add some understanding as to the daily plight and conditions the average worker might have undergone in Industrial Manchester.

Thesis