dayo adeyemi design portfolio 2015

Adedayo AdeyemiPORTFOLIO 2015Ennead Architects New York CityDublin School of Architecture DIT

Contents

Proffesional Experience 1. Taopu 1st Place Masterplan Competition 2. Huawei Wuhan Welcome Center 3. Montefiore Childrens Hospital, Bronx NYC Undergraduate Experience 4. Redbull Extreme Sports Centre and Media School 5. Reaction - Linen Hall 6.Skerries Masterplan & Boat House

International Urban Design CompetitionPhase 1 Master-plan 1st place Winning Scheme

TAOPUSCITECHSMARTCITY

The project is located in Taopu Town on the western edge of Shanghai. Our client,Liangang Economic Development Group, drafted an International competition brief which called for the transformation of the 42,000sqm site from an Industrial district to a modern service clus-ter, an iconic, green, 24/7 activated research and development, commercial, neighbourhood.

With direct access to the subway, bus lines, and the adjacent ring road, the site offers direct con-nections to the rest of the city. Located next to one of the city’s primary train lines, the district and its skyline will become a memorable part of many travellers’ entry to Shanghai. Last, with its close proximity to Tongji University’s Huxi Campus, the site is perfectly sited to become a key R&D district.

In order to create an iconic district, the designs formal strategy manifests as a series of curvi-linear bands of infrastructure which share a unifying architectural language, these lines cre-ate a network of multi-level, connective, pedestrian friendly, informal and formal urban spaces. Our design takes a holistic approach to the project, creating a district that is intensively connected to the surrounding district, its central park, its system of canals, roads, subways, and infrastructure.

Formal Design Strategies

1: Place linear buildings across the site, creating primary urban “park rooms.”

2: Break buildings to reduce length and to maximize pedestrian connectivity at ground level.

3: Weave site together with continuous landscape and pedestrian lines.

Define towers as visual beacons at critical vantage points and view corridors.

5: Add object buildings to create a secondary scale of architecture and specialized programs across the site.

park

The design anchors the site to its surrounding context in three specific ways:

The design creates a series of enclosed public spaces which pull the landscape of the central park onto our site.

The design creates strong spatial, pedestrian connections with the two adjacent subway stations. These connections pull pedestrians deep into the site, creating the potential for two highly-activated retail hubs connected by the primary east-west road on our site.

The central cluster of linear towers creates a central focus and terminus at the southern end of the center park.

Anchor to the Site

The 21st century “eco-city” is a network of distinct districts or “hubs”, interconnected to create the larger city. We believe Taopu Sci-tech City is perfectly sited to maximize its connections with the surrounding district and city, and to become a model for creating these hubs throughout the city of Shanghai. To do this, the project has four design goals:

Maximize visual connections to the surrounding site and transportation infrastructures. Given the project’s location directly adjacent to a large ring road, a number of primary avenues, and a main train line entering the city, the design must create an iconic district skyline that is highly visible from a number of strategic surrounding vantage points, including the western highway, the train line to the south, the large avenue and intersection to the east, and the central park to the north.

Connect to the central park and surrounding landscape. The given site offers an incredible opportunity to merge this project visually and perceptually with the adjacent central park. In order to do this, the project must create strong visual and pedestrian connections with the park. Given the site’s close adjacencies to existing canals, we also believe the project can create the beginning of a larger pedestrian park network that follows these waterways, connecting the larger district together with green, park spaces paralleling the hydrological canals of the area.

Maximize connections to the City’s infrastructure. The site’s close proximity to both the municipal subway as well as the city’s bus lines is a huge asset. The design creates strong connections with the two existing subway stations at either end of the site. It also creates a new regional bus transportation hub at the eastern edge of the site. Last, the design closely studies the automobile traffic patterns to merge the arrival patterns for our site with the overall circulation diagram of the surrounding area.

Create opportunities for creating retail hubs. The design reinforces the site’s pedestrian connection to the existing subway stations by creating multi-level retail/pedestrian experiences that fluidly connect subway passengers to the ground level spaces of our site. The design does not treat the B1 retail as a separate series of spaces, but rather creates a holistic, seamless transition between underground and aboveground spaces.

Connect to the City

create a strong identity at the site’s eastern intersection

The design incorporates an “Amenity Zone” parallel to the site’s central street, within this zone, a series of sloped lawns, amphitheaters, and sunken courtyards create strong pedestrian connections between the ground and B1 levels. These spaces also create beautiful vertical sequences connecting the underground parking levels to the ground level. Last, due to their central location, these spaces become primary locations for shared amenities, retail areas, and dining options. When combined together, these spaces create a linear pedestrian environment that unites the ground and B1 levels and create an activated, pedestrian-friendly amenity corridor for the site.

Multi-level Pedestrian Experience

N

0 10 20 40m

Lobby

Food and Beverage

Retail

Amenity

Office

SOHO Office

Ground Floor Program Although the design incorporates the greater wide master plan, including the design of the adjacent central park.

We were asked to further develop 4 distinct plots 605, 606, 615 and 616 to Strategic Design level, this included the detailed layouts of the Underground Basement parking and retail levels to the building ergonomics, facade strategy and tower core design.

Food and Beverage

Outdoor Garden

Retail

Transit

Service and Mechanical

N

0 10 20 40m

Underground B1 Program

This project creates an activated, 24/7 mixed-use development. To achieve this goal, the design creates a balance of uses and a connective network of spaces which tie these various uses together as an urban environment. Critical to the success of the project is the designs utilization of a multi-level pedestrian network. The design unifies pedestrian spaces at the B1, ground, and second level, creating a fluid experience that activates retail areas, park spaces, and street-scapes. By unifying these various uses and connecting them to the surrounding district and transportation infrastructures, the design creates a diverse, multi-use urban environment and a pedestrian experience that is constantly activated throughout the day, week, and year. This constant “urban activation” is the first step to bringing to this district the diverse research and development companies, retail vendors, and cultural institutions, that in the long run will produce a self-sufficient, economically and culturally thriving urban “hub” within the larger city of Shanghai.

Create a 24/7 Mixed Use Environment

Atrium Lobby

x8 Elevators

x8 Elevators

x6 Elevators

Refuge Floor

Mechanical Penthouse

Elevators

Typical Low-Rise Area: 3940 sqm

Typical Mid-Rise Area: 2300 sqm

Typical High-Rise Area: 1936 sqm

There are three inter-related design goals which must be addressed to create optimal building environments for 21st-century corporate research communities. First, the buildings must be designed to maximize efficiency and flexibility for the future growth, development, and evolution of corporate and research tenants. Second, the design must maximize interaction between employees and between diverse companies and research teams. Third, the design must create a series of shared signature spaces - both indoor and outdoor – creating a shared identity and maximizing intellectual connectivity amongst the research and development community.

Section and Floor plates of Typical Tower

Eco-cities should not simply include sustainable engineering practices. They must catalyze these sustainable systems and infrastructures to create a visibly “green”, livable city --- a place that both upholds the highest performance standards while also making these systems visibly manifest as physical and visible components of urban and building-scale design. In order to create a model 21st century eco-city, our design both incorporates sustainable design strategies and utilizes these features as an integral component of the project’s visible identity.

Sustainable landscape systems are a critical component of our design and help merge our architectural and urban-scale designs with the surrounding landscape and infrastructure. These systems include: 1.) Green roofs and planted terraces which, along with a maximization of green area at the ground level, help minimize the storm-water run-off from the site; 2.) High Albedo (light material color) hard-scape materials which help reduce the solar heat island effect; 3.) A network of connected ponds and canals which serves as an important component of a larger regional storm-water management plan, while also creating visual beauty and recreational landscapes for the district; and, 4.) An integrated and connective network of pedestrian pathways and landscape corridors which help create a walkable district, connect directly with the subway and other regional transportation networks, and minimize the need for individual travel by car.

Similarly, a number of sustainable design systems and approaches are integrated into the building scale of the design. The overall floor plate sizes and building orientations help to maximize interior access to natural daylight and ventilation. Similarly, the strategic location of buildings at the site’s edges helps maximize access to sunlight within the designs outdoor spaces. Active systems, such as solar photo-voltaic panels are incorporated on a number of buildings throughout the site. Last, and perhaps most importantly, the buildings’ primary exterior envelopes have been developed to maximize energy efficiency while still maintaining a high degree of access to views and natural light from the building’s interiors. These facade systems assume an average 50% window to wall ratio, which is crucial to creating high-performing, energy-efficient, “green” buildings.

Create a Green City

Green terraces shade office spaces and tie the landscape to the site’s architecture.

A network of ponds and canals serve as an important component in stormwater management as well as providing a public amenity.

Green amphitheaters extend the landscape into the functional public realm.

Shallow pools create opportunities for on-site water retention, irrigation and natural water remediation

Extensive green roofs mitigate stormwater runoff and unify the broad architectural gestures across the site.

High albedo surfaces help reduce heat island effect.

Sustainable Design Strategies

Wall Section at Typical Office Partial Elevation at Typical Office Wall

Partial Plan at Typical Office Wall

The building envelope system is one of the most important components of an energy efficient, “green” building. The building façade system has a dramatic impact on the overall energy consumption for a building. In order to maximize the efficiency of the project’s façade systems, the design makes two initial conclusions. First, the buildings should minimize the overall amount of glass and maximize the areas of highly-insulated, solid walls within the project. Second, the design must accomplish this without blocking primary views and access to natural daylight from the building interiors. To accomplish these goals, the design assumes a 50% window-to-wall ratio. The details on this page provide the base wall system for the project, creating a highly-efficient wall type that can then be adjusted from building to building to increase visual variation and to adjust to specific building orientations across the site.

Energy efficient facades respond to the local solar orientations allowing both continuity and differentiation across their spans.

Light wells press into the ground plane to maximize light and air to the floor below.

The project is located within the research and development campus for Huawei Technologies in Wuhan China. The brief called for the design of 2 visually distinct welcome centres centrally lo-cated at the entries into the northern and Southern halves of the campus, the designs would then subsequently inform the language of the 6 security centres dispersed across the site.

6 unique designs narrowed down to 2 were developed which incorporated concepts of corporate identity, nature and various media technologies to create a highly stimulating sensory experi-ence as one crosses the threshold of public and private. The concept designs is handed over to the local architect in China, then drawn to design development and construction documentation phases.

HUAWEI

CAMPUSWELC

OMECENTER

& underground stair egress parking canopy structures

Option1 - Garden Walk sketches Option 2 - U Curve sketches

Garden Walk Scheme - Ground Floor PlanGarden Walk Scheme - Ground Floor Plan

Huawei Wuhan Research and Development Campus 华为武汉研发和生产园区项目工作会议 2014-06-23 |

长剖面long section

立面elevation

地下出入口檐蓬方案undeRgRound paRKing access canopy _concept option 1

平面plan

短剖面sHoRt section

透视图peRspective

Underground Parking Access Canopy Design

Huawei Wuhan Research and Development Campus 华为武汉研发和生产园区项目工作会议 2014-06-23 |

平面plan

长剖面long section

立面elevation

地下室消防楼梯及遮檐研究Basement egRess staiR and canopy study

透视图peRspective

短剖面sHoRt section

Basement Egress Stair Canopy Design

MONTEFIORECHILDRENSHOSPITALExterior envelope design study and Canopy concept design

The project comprises an expansion to the Children’s Hospital at Montefiore (CHAM), a state of the art facil-ity serving the Bronx and regional communities. The CHAM II expansion project will include a new 14-story CHAM II building located on the southeast corner of Montefiore Medical Center’s Moses campus at the corner of Bainbridge Ave. and East 210th St, , New York; extensive demolition and renovations of existing floors of CHAM I and Foreman Buildings; and a new bridge connection linking the eighth floors of CHAM I and Fore-man Buildings.

The following report represents a brief overview of the work performed in the Design Development Phase of the project with particular focus on the design of the exterior envelope, wall cladding systems and ground floor canopy.

The scope of work during the SD and DD phases for the entire design team comprised the creation of the de-tailed space program; the analysis of multiple program stacking and layout alternatives within the established site boundaries and preferred massing; the study of multiple design solutions for bridging over the existing radiotherapy department and linear accelerator (LINAC); the analysis and development of a new patient ve-hicular drop-off area on Bainbridge Ave; developed building massing and detailed programmatic layout on all floors; the preparation of technical and building systems requirement reports; and development of the initial sustainable design statement and LEED 2009 Healthcare checklist.

CHAM II_1

EL 179.99

L_1

EL 183.99

FOREMAN_6

EL 259.20

FOREMAN_7

EL 271.86

FOREMAN_8

EL 284.53

CHAM II_MECH 1

EL 165.49

L_2

EL 196.49

L_3

EL 211.20

L_4

EL 225.86

L_5

EL 239.86

L_6

EL 253.86

L_7

EL 267.86

L_8

EL 288.86

L_9

EL 302.86

L_10

EL 316.86

L_11

EL 330.86

L_12

EL 344.86

L_13

EL 358.86

L_14

EL 372.86

L_15

EL 386.86

L_ROOF

EL 409.86

C1.1 C1.2 C1.3 C1.4 C1.5 C1.6

CHAM I_ROOF

EL 330.86

CHAM I_BULK HEAD

EL 344.70

C1.3.1

C2.A C2.B C2.C C2.D C2.E C2.F

L_LOBBY

EL 193.51

10A-300

11A-300

FOREMAN_ROOF

EL 298.53

FOREMAN_MACH. RM.

EL 311.20

L_7M

EL 279.36

23' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

21' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

8"

17' -

8 1

/4"

13' -

6 1

/4"

14' -

6"

L_BULKHEAD

EL 419.86

10' -

0"

CHAM II EXISTING CHAM I EXISTING FOREMAN

C2.A5 C2.C5 C2.D5 C2.E5

A-31121

RFG-1 RFG-1RFG-1

PARAPET

ST. STL. BOLLARDS

PTD. STL. GUARDRAIL

A-25040

A-25020

A-25120

A-25140

TYP.

WS-1

CW-6

WS-1

CW-5

MTL-1

CPY-1

CW-1ARFG-2

WS-2

WDW-1

CW-3

CW-3

CW-3

CW-3

CW-1

LVR-1

WS-6

WS-1

SOFFIT

EXTERIOR MATERIAL INDEX

UNITIZED CURTAIN WALL SYSTEMEAST / WEST FACADE

NOTE: SEE PROJECT MANUAL FOR DETAILS

UNITIZED CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM - SOUTH FACADE

UNITIZED CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM - EAST / WEST INFILL

WOOD CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM - ENTRY FLOOR

ROOFING WITH PAVERS

SUN SHADE, SOUTH FACADE

ALUMINUM PLATE PANEL WALL AND SOFFIT

ALUMINUM PLATE PANEL SCREEN WALLAT PENTHOUSE

CURTAIN WALL - BRIDGE

ROOFING

STONE PLAZA

ENTRY CANOPY - EAST FACADE

BRICK CAVITY WALL ROSENTHAL INFILL

METAL PANEL TO MATCH EXISTING

PUNCHED WINDOW

UNITIZED CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM - NO GLAZINGEAST / WEST FACADE AT PARAPET

AESS COLUMN - ENTRY FLOOR

CPY-1

CW-1

CW-1A

CW-2

CW-3

CW-4 UNITIZED CURTAIN WALL UNITWITH ALUMINUM PLATE CLADDING

CW-5

CW-6

RFG-1

RFG-2

MTL-1

SS-1

WDW-1

WS-1

WS-2

WS-3

WS-4

WS-5

LVR-1 EXTRUDED ALUMINUM STORM RESISTANT LOUVER

WS-6 CEMENT BOARD PANEL WALL

RLG-E1 PAINTED STEEL BAR OSHA GUARDRAIL

WDW-2 RIBBON CLERESTORY

GL-E1

GL-E2

GL-E3

GL-E4

LOW E, CLEAR LOW-IRONINSULATING LAMINATED GLASS

LOW E COATED, CLEARINSULATING LAMINATED GLASS

CLEAR LOW-IRON LAMINATED GLASS

MONOLITHIC STRUCTURALLY GLAZEDEGRESS ENCLOSURE

Sheet No.

Sheet Title

Date

Key Plan

Seal

Project Title

Project Number

Scale

Copyright ©

2011 Ennead Architects, LLP

PAGE NO.

NYC DOB NUMBER

Montefiore Medical CenterFacilities Design & Construction Department90 East 210th StreetBronx, New York 10467718.920.7705 telwww.montefiore.org

MontefioreMedical Center111 East 210th StreetBronx, New York 10467

The Children'sHospital at Montefiore3415 Bainbridge AvenueBronx, New York 10467

MEP ConsultantBard, Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers, PC105 Madison Avenue, 10th floorNew York, New York 10016212.840.0060 telwww.brplusa.com

Structural Consultant

Civil Consultant

Thornton Tomasetti51 Madison AvenueNew York, New York 10010-1603917.661.7800 tel 917.661.7801 faxwww.thorntontomasetti.com

Langan Engineering & Environmental Services360 W 31st Street, 8th FloorNew York, New ork 10001212.479.5400 tel 212.479.5444 faxwww.langan.com

Architect

Ennead Architects LLP320 West 13th StreetNew York, NY 10014-1278212.807.7171 tel 212.807.5917 faxwww.ennead.com

Perkins Eastman115 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10003212.353.7200 tel 212.353.7676 faxwww.perkinseastman.com

Architect

Owner

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDRAFT

1/16" = 1'-0"

C:\U

sers\dmw

ong\Docum

ents\1409_A-CH

AM_ll_dm

wong.rvt

12/5/2014 5:10:00 PM

A-200.00

EXTERIOR ELEVATION

12/05/2014 PE 55841.00EA 1409.00

1/16" = 1'-0"10 East Elevation

10

ELEVATION NOTE: PER LOCAL LAW 96/13, THE SITE SURVEY AND EXISTING FLOOR LEVEL ELEVATIONS HAVE BEEN UPDATED USING

ELEVATIONS REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM (NAVD) OF 1988.

WS-1

No. Issue Name Date

12-05-2014Enclosure Design Assist PackageDRAFT FOR REVIEW

East Facing ElevationEast Facing Elevation

CHAM II_1

EL 179.99

CHAM II_MECH 1

EL 165.49

L_2

EL 196.49

L_3

EL 211.20

L_4

EL 225.86

L_5

EL 239.86

L_6

EL 253.86

L_7

EL 267.86

L_8

EL 288.86

L_9

EL 302.86

L_10

EL 316.86

L_11

EL 330.86

L_12

EL 344.86

L_13

EL 358.86

L_14

EL 372.86

L_15

EL 386.86

L_ROOF

EL 409.86

C2.1C2.2C2.4 C2.2.5

L_LOBBY

EL 193.51

C2.3

23' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

21' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

8"

14' -

8 1

/2"

16' -

6"

14' -

6"

L_7M

EL 279.36

L_BULKHEAD

EL 419.86

10' -

0"

EXISTING ROSENTHAL SOUTH CHAM II

C2.2.4

CW-2

SS-1

RETURNS ATINSIDE FACEOF WALL

ST. STL. RAILING


A-25220

A-25240

CW-5

CPY-1

CW-1

TYP.


CW-1ACW-1A

CW-1


WS-4

CW-5

TYP.

FACADEMAINTENANCE

WALK

WS-5 WS-5

WS-1

GL-E4

SOFFIT







ROOFING WITH PAVERS





ROOFING

STONE PLAZA




PUNCHED WINDOW



CPY-1

CW-1

CW-1A

CW-2

CW-3


CW-5

CW-6

RFG-1

RFG-2

MTL-1

SS-1

WDW-1

WS-1

WS-2

WS-3

WS-4

WS-5





GL-E1

GL-E2

GL-E3

GL-E4





CHAM II_1

EL 179.99

CHAM II_MECH 1

EL 165.49

L_2

EL 196.49

L_3

EL 211.20

L_4

EL 225.86

L_5

EL 239.86

L_6

EL 253.86

L_7

EL 267.86

L_8

EL 288.86

L_9

EL 302.86

L_10

EL 316.86

L_11

EL 330.86

L_12

EL 344.86

L_13

EL 358.86

L_14

EL 372.86

L_15

EL 386.86

L_ROOF

EL 409.86

C2.4 C2.2.5

L_LOBBY

EL 193.51

C2.3

L_7M

EL 279.36

L_BULKHEAD

EL 419.86

C2.2.4

23' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

21' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

8"

14' -

8 1

/2"

16' -

6"

14' -

6"

10' -

0"

EXISTING RADIOTHERAPY

CHAM II

FACADEMAINTENANCE

WALK


A-25323

CW-3

CW-4

WS-2

CW-1

Sheet No.

Sheet Title

Date

Key Plan

Seal

Project Title

Project Number

Scale

Copyright ©

2011 Ennead A

rchitects, LLP

PAGE NO.

NYC DOB NUMBER






Civil Consultant



Architect



Architect

Owner


1/16" = 1'-0"

C:\U

sers\dmw

ong\Docum

ents\1409_A-C

HA

M_ll_dm

wong.rvt

12/5/2014 5:10:37 PM

A-201.00

EXTERIOR ELEVATION

12/05/2014 PE 55841.00EA 1409.00

1/16" = 1'-0"10 South Elevation

10

1/16" = 1'-0"20 Partial South Elevation



No. Issue Name Date


South Facing Elevation

CHAM II_1

EL 179.99

L_1

EL 183.99

CHAM II_MECH 1

EL 165.49

L_2

EL 196.49

L_3

EL 211.20

L_4

EL 225.86

L_5

EL 239.86

L_6

EL 253.86

L_7

EL 267.86

L_8

EL 288.86

L_9

EL 302.86

L_10

EL 316.86

L_11

EL 330.86

L_12

EL 344.86

L_13

EL 358.86

L_14

EL 372.86

L_15

EL 386.86

L_ROOF

EL 409.86

C1.1

C2.AC2.BC2.CC2.DC2.EC2.F

L_LOBBY

EL 193.51

23' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

21' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

8"

14' -

8 1

/2"

16' -

6"

14' -

6"

L_7M

EL 279.36

L_BULKHEAD

EL 419.86

10' -

0"

RADIOTHERAPYRADIOLOGY

CHAM IIEXISTINGCHAM I

C2.A5C2.C5C2.D5C2.E5

PARAPET

RFG-2

A-25320

PEDESTRIAN TUNNEL

CW-1A

CW-1

CW-3

CW-5

WS-5

MTL-1

CW-4

RFG-1 RFG-1RFG-1

WS-2

TYP.WS-1

LVR-1LVR-1

A-25140 OPP.

SIM.

WS-6RLG-E1

WS-1

WS-3

WS-1 SOFFIT

CHAM II_1

EL 179.99

L_1

EL 183.99

CHAM II_MECH 1

EL 165.49

L_2

EL 196.49

L_3

EL 211.20

L_4

EL 225.86

L_5

EL 239.86

L_6

EL 253.86

L_7

EL 267.86

L_8

EL 288.86

L_9

EL 302.86

L_10

EL 316.86

L_11

EL 330.86

L_12

EL 344.86

L_13

EL 358.86

L_14

EL 372.86

L_15

EL 386.86

L_ROOF

EL 409.86

C2.1 C2.2 C2.4C2.2.5

L_LOBBY

EL 193.51

C2.3

L_7M

EL 279.36

L_BULKHEAD

EL 419.86

C2.2.4



A-25243

A-25223

WS-2

WDW-2

CW-4

CW-3

CW-1

CPY-1

MTL-1

CW-1

CW-4

A-20311

WS-1

RLG-E1

CW-4

WS-1







ROOFING WITH PAVERS





ROOFING

STONE PLAZA




PUNCHED WINDOW



CPY-1

CW-1

CW-1A

CW-2

CW-3


CW-5

CW-6

RFG-1

RFG-2

MTL-1

SS-1

WDW-1

WS-1

WS-2

WS-3

WS-4

WS-5





GL-E1

GL-E2

GL-E3

GL-E4





Sheet No.

Sheet Title

Date

Key Plan

Seal

Project Title

Project Number

Scale

Copyright ©


PAGE NO.

NYC DOB NUMBER






Civil Consultant



Architect



Architect

Owner


1/16" = 1'-0"

C:\U

sers\dmw

ong\Docum

ents\1409_A-CH

AM_ll_dm

wong.rvt

12/5/2014 5:11:02 PM

A-202.00

EXTERIOR ELEVATION

12/05/2014 PE 55841.00EA 1409.00

1/16" = 1'-0"10 West Elevation

1/16" = 1'-0"20 North Elevation

10

20



No. Issue Name Date


West Facing ElevationNorth Facing Elevation

CHAM II_1

EL 179.99

L_1

EL 183.99

CHAM II_MECH 1

EL 165.49

L_2

EL 196.49

L_3

EL 211.20

L_4

EL 225.86

L_5

EL 239.86

L_6

EL 253.86

L_7

EL 267.86

L_8

EL 288.86

L_9

EL 302.86

L_10

EL 316.86

L_11

EL 330.86

L_12

EL 344.86

L_13

EL 358.86

L_14

EL 372.86

L_15

EL 386.86

L_ROOF

EL 409.86

C1.1

C2.AC2.BC2.CC2.DC2.EC2.F

L_LOBBY

EL 193.51

23' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

21' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

0"

14' -

8"

14' -

8 1

/2"

16' -

6"

14' -

6"

L_7M

EL 279.36

L_BULKHEAD

EL 419.86

10' -

0"

RADIOTHERAPYRADIOLOGY

CHAM IIEXISTINGCHAM I

C2.A5C2.C5C2.D5C2.E5

PARAPET

RFG-2

A-25320

PEDESTRIAN TUNNEL

CW-1A

CW-1

CW-3

CW-5

WS-5

MTL-1

CW-4

RFG-1 RFG-1RFG-1

WS-2

TYP.WS-1

LVR-1LVR-1

A-25140 OPP.

SIM.

WS-6RLG-E1

WS-1

WS-3

WS-1 SOFFIT

CHAM II_1

EL 179.99

L_1

EL 183.99

CHAM II_MECH 1

EL 165.49

L_2

EL 196.49

L_3

EL 211.20

L_4

EL 225.86

L_5

EL 239.86

L_6

EL 253.86

L_7

EL 267.86

L_8

EL 288.86

L_9

EL 302.86

L_10

EL 316.86

L_11

EL 330.86

L_12

EL 344.86

L_13

EL 358.86

L_14

EL 372.86

L_15

EL 386.86

L_ROOF

EL 409.86

C2.1 C2.2 C2.4C2.2.5

L_LOBBY

EL 193.51

C2.3

L_7M

EL 279.36

L_BULKHEAD

EL 419.86

C2.2.4



A-25243

A-25223

WS-2

WDW-2

CW-4

CW-3

CW-1

CPY-1

MTL-1

CW-1

CW-4

A-20311

WS-1

RLG-E1

CW-4

WS-1







ROOFING WITH PAVERS





ROOFING

STONE PLAZA




PUNCHED WINDOW



CPY-1

CW-1

CW-1A

CW-2

CW-3


CW-5

CW-6

RFG-1

RFG-2

MTL-1

SS-1

WDW-1

WS-1

WS-2

WS-3

WS-4

WS-5





GL-E1

GL-E2

GL-E3

GL-E4





Sheet No.

Sheet Title

Date

Key Plan

Seal

Project Title

Project Number

Scale

Copyright ©


PAGE NO.

NYC DOB NUMBER






Civil Consultant



Architect



Architect

Owner


1/16" = 1'-0"

C:\U

sers\dmw

ong\Docum

ents\1409_A-CH

AM_ll_dm

wong.rvt

12/5/2014 5:11:02 PM

A-202.00

EXTERIOR ELEVATION

12/05/2014 PE 55841.00EA 1409.00

1/16" = 1'-0"10 West Elevation

1/16" = 1'-0"20 North Elevation

10

20



No. Issue Name Date


Section 3.3 cham ii exterior wall systemsDRAFT

CW-1 TYPICAL PLAN DETAILTERRACOTA TO VISION GLASS

SCALE: 3” = 1’ - 0”

EXTERIOR

INTERIOR

5/8” GYP. BD. ON 3 5/8” METAL STUDS

DOTTED LINE INDICATES FLOOR SLAB EDGE

GALVANIZED STEEL SHEET AIR SEAL

MINERAL FIBER INSULATION

MILINE OF PTD. ECTRUDED ALUMINIUM STOOL SECURED TO MULLION

EXTRUDED ALUMINUM SPLIT MULLION

ST.STL. ANGLE CLIPS WITH THERMAL ISOLATOR PAD

1/8” THK. PTD. ALUMINUM PLATE WEATHER SEAL

INSULATED GLASS STRUCTURALLY GLAZED TO MULLION

CONT. PTD. ALUM . ANGLE CLOSURE CONNECTED TO CARRIER RAILS

LINE OF EXTRUDED ALUMINUM FLOOR SLAB TRIM BELOW

EXTRUDED ALUMINUM PLATE TRIM WITH THERMALLY BROKEN CONNECTION TO MULLION

CUSTOM SHAPED GLAZED TERRA COTTA PANELS SECURED WITH ALUM. CLIPS TO EXTRUDED ALUM. CARRIER RAILS

Montefi ore Medical Center | Children’s Hospital at Montefi ore | Bronx, New YorkEnclosure Design Assist Report

December 5, 2014Page 21

Section 3.3 cham ii exterior wall systems

CW-1 TYPICAL STACK JOINT SECTIONTERRACOTTA TO SHADOW BOX

SCALE: 3” = 1’ - 0”

DRAFT

4”

INTERIOR

INSULATED GLASS UNIT STRUCTURALLY GLAZED TO EXTRUDED ALUMINIUM MULLION

1/8” THK . PTD . ALUMINIUM PLATE SHADOW BOX WITH INTEGRAL MINERAL FIBER INSULATION

5/8” GYP . BD. ON METAL STUDS

LINE OF EXTRUDED ALUMINIUM JAMB TRIM BEYOND

CUSTOM SHAPE GLAZED TERRA COTTA PANEL SECURED WITH ALUMINIUM CLIPS

EXTRUDED ALUMINIUM CARRIER RAIL TUBE ANCHORED WITH “F” CLIPS TO ST. STL . ANGLE CLIPS ON MULLION

EXTRUDED ALUMINIUM TRIM WITH CONT. DRIP EDGE AND WEEP HOLES

EXTRUDED ALUMINIUM TRIM

MINERAL FIBRE INSULATION

1/8” THICK PTD. ALUMINIUM PLATE BACK PAN ANCHORED AND SEALED TO MULLIONS

4”



CPY-1 ENTRY CANOPY &MTL-1 AESS COLUMN

Section 3.3 cham ii exterior wall systems

CPY-1:Epoxy painted, built-up steel plate frame with LED light strips at underside of frame members and integral gutter along top of main beam attached to ‘V’ columns, supporting the structurally glazed, 3/4” thick laminated and tempered clear class with custom printed interlayer.

MTL-1:Structural “V” columns and canopy framing shall be AESS steel. The “V” columns shall receive an intumescent fi re resistant coating and all steel shall receive a TNEMEC exterior paint coating. Provide “V” coumns with stone panel clad concrete base.

DRAFT

14' -

7"

Largest Glass Panel Size Approx

13’ 6”

148’ 6”

C2.A C2.A5 C2.B C2.C C2.C5 C2.D C2.D5 C2.E C2.E5 C2.F

16’ 7”

15’ 3”

9’



CPY-1:15’ 3”Epoxy painted, built-up steel plate frame with LEDlight strips at underside of frame members and integral gutter along top of main beam attached to ‘V’ columns, supporting the structurally glazed, 3/4” thick laminated and tempered clear class with custom printed interlayer.MTL-1:Structural “V” columns and canopy framing shall be AESS steel. The “V” columns shall receive an intumescent fire resistant coating and all steel shall receive a TNEMEC exterior paint coating. Provide “V” columns with stone panel clad concrete base

Introduction

The Great Exhibition staged in London’s Hyde Park in 1851 dra-matically demonstrated how much the world had changed since the beginning of the nineteenth century. Joseph Paxton’s vast exhibition hall constructed from prefabricated metal ribs and sheets of glass (the Crystal Palace) was the work of not an architect but of a self-taught engineer. [5](Frank Whitford - Bauhaus - 1991)

As these changes occurred a number of individuals believed that the machine announced the imminent demise of both individuality and the craftsman, most articulate of these being John Ruskin and William Morris. “Both of these believed the effects of industrial pro-duction were spiritually damaging to craftsman and customer alike: the machine had no soul; it would render mankind soulless”[5]

Art and Craft Education Reform

Following impractical attempts by Morris to stem the tide of indus-trialisation, German Architect Gottfried Semper 1803-79 and direc-tor of South Kensington Museum and school of design Henry Cole 1808-82 believed that technological advance was irreversible and instead of devising ways to keep traditional crafts alive, they pro-posed the education of a new kind of craftsman who would under-stand and exploit the machines potential in an artistically sensitive fashion. Together they exerted a considerable influence in arts and crafts education reform, not only in Britain but also on the continent, and especially in Germany and Austria.

The Avant-garde artists’ association, the Vienna Secession 1898 was concerned with revitalising architecture and the crafts as it was with freeing painting and sculpture from the shackles of historicism. Secession members were instrumental in establishing the ‘Wie-ner Werkstatt’ in 1903, crafts workshops which produced furniture, household goods, textiles and clothes for sale in its own shop, thus providing training and financial support for artists and craftsmen.

Meanwhile in Germany, Architect Hermann Muthesius having being appointed superintendent of schools of arts and crafts by the Prus-sian Board of trade, Muthesius encouraged the establishment of training workshops in which students could learn by actually making things rather than designing them on paper. In 1907 he founded an organization”The Werkbund”. The Werkbund was to arrange for em-ployment of designers in industry and sustain a publicity campaign directed at the improvement of manufactured goods. [5]

In 1912 architect Walter Gropius joined the Werkbund taking an ac-tive part in its organization and policy making, he would eventually go on to establish the Bauhaus school in 1919. It was founded with the idea of creating a “total” work of art in which all arts, including ar-chitecture, would eventually be brought together. The Bauhaus style became one of the most influential currents in Modernist architecture and modern design.

“Capitalism has changed and is changing. Vast new areas in the Third World have industrialised. The introduction of small, cheap, flexible computers is revolutionising finance, adminis-tration, retailing, manufacturing. The majority of the workforce in many capitalist countries is now “white-collar” - but white-collar work is becoming more industrial.” - Martin Thomas “Post-fordism”:collapsing into the present - Workers Liberty Oct. 2005.

“Post-Fordism is associated with broader social and cultural changes...greater fragmentation and pluralism, the weaken-ing of older collective solidarities and block identities and the emergence of new identities associated with greater work flex-ibility, the maximisation of individual choices through personal consumption” - Stuart Hall “Brave New World” - Marxism Today Oct.1988.

ContextThe term ‘Fordism’ coined after Henry Ford (Industrialist and founder of the Ford Motor Company in 1908) is a notion of modern economic system of mass production and consump-tion characteristic of highly developed economies during the 1940s-1960s. “Henry Ford was once a popular symbol of the transformation from an agricultural to an industrial, mass pro-duction, mass consumption economy”. [1](Fordism,Post-Fordism and the flexible system of production - Fred Thompson, Goudy Professor of Public Management and Policy)

‘Post-Fordism’ is a term that can been used to describe soci-eties transition from an industrial economy primarily based on the production of material goods to one of immaterial services and constitutes the spread of information, ideas, images, cul-ture etc. In 1988 English Communist Party’s magazine ‘Marxism Today’, bearing the banner - ‘post-Fordism’, describe it as “the shift from the old mass-production Fordist economy to a new, more flexible, post Fordist order based on computers, informa-tion technology and robotics” [2](Marxism Today, October 1988).

In the article ‘Brave New World’ by Stuart Hall, post-fordism is characterized by the following terms: -Economies of scope-Specialized products and jobs-New information technologies-The rise of the service and the white-collar worker. [3]

Today Post-Fordism can be applied in a wider context to de-scribe a whole system of modern social processes. Because Post-Fordism describes the world as it is today, various thinkers have different views of its form and implications.

PositionThis paper investigates the role, identity and education of the modern day ‘artisan’ within todays post ‘industrial’ context, it ad-dresses societies transition from a ‘fordist’ to ‘post-fordist’ econo-my and investigates the role of the architect and industrialist in an attempt to find the correlation between architectural design and modern industrial processes of making & educating.

StructureTo investigate the identity of the ‘artisan’ of today, we will first historically examine the socio-economic developments of the first Industrial Revolution and identify what challenged the role of the craftsman, what were the social responses in educating the craftsman, and how has this transpired in modern day industries.

The research then assumes itself within the current Irish industrial landscape as we map out the corporate giants in Ireland, and look at opportunities for the developments of a new, largely un-tapped industry in the Irish context.

We then look at the ideologies of educational and architectural theorists such as Paulo Freire, Piere Vittorio and Martino Tattara; and we investigate how this has been tested in 2 built works of architecture, Zaha Hadids BMW Plant in Leipzig Germany 2005 and Vilanova Artigas Architecture school São Paulo 1969.

Finally i will demonstrate how i have tested my thesis idea, com-menting on the relationship between corporate business, archi-tecture and education in 2 projects;

1.Linen Hall - An proposal for a new student exhibition building and fit out for architectural Studios and restaurant.

2.Redbull Culture Centre - An extreme sports, media and admin-istration facility located in the Dublin Docklands.

Industrial Revolution“An industrial revolution is the process of economic change by which a country is shifted onto a path of sustained growth in pro-ductivity and living standards.” [4](Phyllis Deane - The First Industrial Revolution -1979)

The Industrial Revolution of 1750 -1850 which began in Britain was a period where changes in agriculture, mining, manufactur-ing, transportation and technology had profound effect on the social, economic, cultural condition of the times.

The industrial Revolution brought forth machines and innovations which upsurged the traditional functions of the artist and crafts-man. Cast Iron was more versatile than brick or wood and steam driven machines could stamp, cut and fashion almost any sub-stance faster and more regularly than the human hand.

Group Portrait of Bauhaus-Masters in Dessau (1926)

The Bauhaus had a profound influence upon subsequent de-velopments in art, architecture, graphic design, interior design, industrial design, and typography. Gropius in his essay ‘Con-cept and Development of the State Bauhaus’ acknowledges the school’s debt to Ruskin and Morris in England... and others in Germany all of whom “consciously sought and found the first ways to the reunification of the world of work with the creative artists”. [5]

However as large scale industries became the primary mode of production, the craftsman eventually would become a labourer of the Industrialist and in many ways that remains so today. We ask the questions, what challenges the role of the modern day craftsman, what would be the Bauhaus School ‘equivalent’ in todays post- industrialized society and In what context would the craftsman find himself?

Meanwhile in Germany, Architect Hermann Muthesius having being appointed superintendent of schools of arts and crafts by the Prussian Board of trade, Muthesius encouraged the es-tablishment of training workshops in which students could learn by actually making things rather than designing them on paper. In 1907 he founded an organization”The Werkbund”. The Werk-bund was to arrange for employment of designers in industry and sustain a publicity campaign directed at the improvement of manufactured goods. [5]

In 1912 architect Walter Gropius joined the Werkbund taking an active part in its organization and policy making, he would eventually go on to establish the Bauhaus school in 1919. It was founded with the idea of creating a “total” work of art in which all arts, including architecture, would eventually be brought to-gether. The Bauhaus style became one of the most influential currents in Modernist architecture and modern design.The Bauhaus had a profound influence upon subsequent de-velopments in art, architecture, graphic design, interior design, industrial design, and typography. Gropius in his essay ‘Con-cept and Development of the State Bauhaus’ acknowledges the school’s debt to Ruskin and Morris in England... and others in Germany all of whom “consciously sought and found the first ways to the reunification of the world of work with the creative artists”. [5]

However as large scale industries became the primary mode of production, the craftsman eventually would become a labourer of the Industrialist and in many ways that remains so today. We ask the questions, what challenges the role of the modern day craftsman, what would be the Bauhaus School ‘equivalent’ in todays post- industrialized society and In what context would the craftsman find himself?

Corporate Interest in EducationIn the present post-fordist context, ‘artisans’ are identified as the individuals at the forefront of innovation in a particular field, this can be in technology, arts, communication etc. The role is primar-ily shifted from blue-collar to white-collar operations, however it remains an industrialized process. Todays post-fordist industrial-ists identify themselves as the major corporate players in various business sectors worldwide e.g Foxconn, Apple, Facebook, Nike etc. If one is to ask what challenges the role of the modern day artisan, the answer would be ‘innovation’ from competing cor-porate bodies. Since knowledge has become such a precious commodity, corporations invest in education in order to acquire a more skillful workforce, this can take place in third level institu-tions where they have invested large amounts of funds into par-ticular research departments, or alternatively the establishment of “innovation/research centres” as part of a larger manufacturing or administration facility.

In many ways, this is where this thesis identifies itself, the vested interest of corporate bodies in educational institutions. Also rele-vant are the effects industrial establishments have to its surround-ing context and how architecture plays a role in educating and facilitating the productive process.

The Irish ContextThe Irish Industrial Development Agency (IDA) is responsible for the attraction and development of foreign investment in Ireland, which is responsible for over 146,000 jobs in Ireland, there are over a thousand different overseas companies situated most of which are from the US. Ireland identifies itself as an attractive lo-cation for foreign investors for several reasons one of which and perhaps the most effective is its very low corporate tax rate of 12.5% with a further tax credit of 25% for research and devel-opment establishments and an intellectual property (IP) regime which provides a tax write off for broadly defined I.P acquisitions.[6]

As a case study we look at American software manufacturing company Intel which, with the help of the IDA established its larg-est european manufacturing facility in Lexilip, co.Kildare in 1989. It currently employs over 4,000 people. In 2003 Intel was asked to look at services innovation, a project that led to a dedicated “IT Innovation Centre” focused on developing applications to drive future demands for Intels products.

As a case study we look at American software manufacturing company Intel which, with the help of the IDA established its larg-est european manufacturing facility in Lexilip, co.Kildare in 1989. It currently employs over 4,000 people. In 2003 Intel was asked to look at services innovation, a project that led to a dedicated “IT Innovation Centre” focused on developing applications to drive future demands for Intels products.

Intel has also had a positive effect in its local community and has set up over 235 community organizations, over 60,646 employee volunteer hours and has set up the Intel Education Initiative which has partnered with educators around the world to improve the quality of science & mathematics as well as promoting technology in the class room and has contributed more than €1 million to local & national education programs. Intel supports university based research in nanotechnology and Digital Health research in various third level institutions across Ireland.[7]

Intel is a clear example demonstrating how corporate bodies invests itself in research and educational institutions. However as an archetype Intel does not fully embody the ideals of post fordist industries. We have previously defined post-fordist industries as being primarily based on the production of immaterial services and constitutes the spread of infor-mation, ideas, images, culture etc.

RedBull This thesis assumes Redbull corporation as its client, its industry primari-ly lies in the production of energy drinks and various other merchandise, the company is identified worldwide for its sleek marketing targeted at ‘youth culture’ throughout various ‘extreme sports’ and entertainment based advertising campaigns.[8][9]”There are few companies--and al-most no “traditional” advertisers--that have the kind of holistic approach to brand experience that ensures every expression, from product to cor-porate culture to communications, is part of a master creative vision. For these companies, marketing is not a department; it’s a genetic part of the brand itself. But Red Bull has taken the brand rigor that made it a global beverage titan and done something vanishingly rare. With an un-ceasing, and meticulously produced and managed stream of high end action sports- and youth culture-oriented content that spans web, social, film, tablet, print, music, and TV, the giver of wings has become what every brand wants to be these days--a media company in full.” [10] (Teressa

Iezzi - editor of Co.Create - Red Bull CEO Dietrich Mateschitz On Brand As Media Company).

As a result one can assume its industry lies in the production and export of two things, the material goods and also its cultural Identity e.g “Redbull gives you wings” [8]. This is done through various sports sponsorships and the organization of ‘extreme sport’ and urban culture events which are extensively marketed and subsequently bought over by the consum-er, as such the ‘young urban culture’ professional becomes an ‘artisan’ of the Redbull industry and the ‘innovation centre’ for such a workforce will exist as a centre for cultural education for the Redbull Identity. Such an establishments is envisioned as accommodating various training fa-cilities in extreme sports and media and will train professionals and host events which are to be heavily marketed and campaigned, it will exist as a culture factory for the production of the Redbull identity.

The facility envisions culture and identity as industrial exports. This po-tentially sets up a new industrial market in the Irish context.

Red Bull Stratos, space diving project - October 2012

The proposed facility locates itself on the current brownfield site on Sir John Rogers Quay located within the former industrial context of Grand Canal Dock. The Site directly frames the corner where the river liffey meets the river Dodder.The site takes up an area of approximately 7,700 sqm and is neigh-boured by high rise office block to the west and protected ware-house structures of historical value to the south

The proposed facility attempts to transform the area into a thriving urban culture zone, a culture that is not only built out of tradition but is continuously evolving in the Dublin city context. As a Client Redbull is one of the few corporations whose cultural identity is built around danger, extreme sports and adventure. The Dublin Dock-lands Development agency have tried to preserve the historical in-dustrial nature of the site through retained and protected pieces of architecture, however they have failed to retain the cultural identity of the area.

An approach is adopted through the architecture which puts more focus on the user-public relationship, and also breaks down the spa-tial order in hierarchical organisation of “blue collar”/ “white collar” operations, in this case the administration facilities and the young urban culture professionals working in this “cultural production line”.

3rd. floor - Library, Auditorium

Structural Strategy

3rd Floor Public Library & Auditorium


Ground Floor Plan

1. Entrance Foyer2. Circulation core3. Red bull HQ Studio office4. Café5. Kitchen6. Learning Platforms7. Utilities8. Swimming facilities9. Outdoor Natural Pools

Roof top

1. Plaza2. Skate Park3. Basket Ball Court4. Circulation Core5. Running Track6. Parkour Facilities

4th Floor Plan - Media School

1. Lounge2. Recording studio3. Meeting Room4. Utilities5. Store6. Studio

1.

1.

5.

6.

2.

3.

4. 4.

4. 4.

1.

6.

7.

3.

1.

2. 2.

4.

6.

3.

2.

2.

1.

5.

2. 2.

2.2.

3.

4.

5.

1.

8.

9.

7th Floor Plan

1. Restaurant2. Gallery3. Shop


Ground Floor Plan


Roof top




1.

1.

5.

6.

2.

3.

4. 4.

4. 4.

1.

6.

7.

3.

1.

2. 2.

4.

6.

3.

2.

2.

1.

5.

2. 2.

2.2.

3.

4.

5.

1.

8.

9.

7th Floor Plan



Ground Floor Plan


Roof top




1.

1.

5.

6.

2.

3.

4. 4.

4. 4.

1.

6.

7.

3.

1.

2. 2.

4.

6.

3.

2.

2.

1.

5.

2. 2.

2.2.

3.

4.

5.

1.

8.

9.

7th Floor Plan


The Brief called for an intervention to the existing fabric of the Linen Hall building of DIT Bolton street, which currently houses the schools architecture design department as well as various trade workshops.The interventions were to reflect our early theoretical positions and explore opportunities to physically test out our ideas.

I assumed a position which commented on the existing condition of the social spaces within the site while creating an additional avenue in architectural education through the amalgamation of working architecture studios.

The focus is creating active social spaces within the facility. This is achieved in part by the new 160sqm exhibition hall is identifies itself as a central hub for the share of knowledge and ideas while facilitating spaces for critiques, presentations and galleries.

The 2 courtyards on site have been landscaped to give a refreshing look to the facility with granite ground slabs. The existing Foudry building to the north of that site has been refitted to now accommo-date a new restaurant on the basement level and a shared studio space for practicing architects on the ground level. This commercialisation of the linen hall facilitates students and staff by integrating itself with the architectural student curriculum, providing a new avenue for real world work experience, an aspect that can be both beneficial to the student and practicing architects.

In the project the theme of commercialisation, architecture and architecture are addressed by bringing the business into education while creating dialogue between programme with the use of socially active spaces and functions. The restaurant and low level courtyard demonstrate how the exhibition building is linked to the architectural offices and remaining programme above.

Detail .Timber post and beam fixed with steel bracket.

workshop 1 :20

External Timber shuttering system andVertical tmber louver detail 1:10

Outdoor Precast Concrete seating detail, polished concrete finish.

Timber Structure for Boat Storage. Steel brackets system used to connect all posts and beams.Timber post fixed to concrete foundationDetail 1:10

100mmx50mm Treated oak timber beam spanning 2300mm fixed to wall by steel plate fixedand screwed into and screwed into concrete face.(Fixing system reused for ceiling beams and exterior timber posts)

Aqua Paving build up- 80mm/60mm White Granite permeable paving- laying Course 50mm Grit-Permeable Sub-Base -Geotixtile-Membrane -Membrane (surface rain water drained & collected by perforated pipe to be recylced)

External Wall Construction200 mm Board Marked concrete 200 mm Board Marked concrete block outer leaf 100mm cavity with 80mm "Kingspan Thermawall" between timber joists to support recycled timber shutters used for concrete pour"

Floor Construction-100mm concrete polished finish-110 mm kingspan insulation-Vapour barrier-200 mm Conrete strip foundation

ROOF CONSTRUCTION -20mm of gravel -Paralon roof membrane -separation layer -19mm WBP Plywood -firing pieces laid to falls-200 x 100 mm joists. -200 x 100 mm joists. -200mm Kingspan Thermapitch Insulation-50mm plywood- 550mm x Glulam Timber beams spanning 9500mm

Insulated, Firerated, Motorised Timber Shutter for Boat Workshop 6100mm x 4500mm

AB

Perspective View B

Concept strategy for protection of Marram grass.Minimising trampling accross the sand dunes by creating fixed and controled pathways through to the beach.

Perspective View A looking North

AB

Perspective View B



AB

Perspective View B



Dayo Adeyemi is a graduate from the Dublin School of Architecture, DIT , Ireland, where he received his B.Arch, Masters equivalent in Architecture in 2013.

“This Portfolio demonstrates a thought process and work ethic which Dayo employs towards design. His passion for architecture is only met by his in-terest in the social dynamics inherent in human behaviour which is always a mediating force in his architecture.

A hard working and creative personality, he has always proven to be a valua-ble addition to the creative workforce”

- Neil Burke Kennedy - NBK Architects References available on request.

dayo adeyemi design portfolio 2015

Documents