day7 upload

Upload: kumar-prashant

Post on 02-Jun-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Day7 Upload

    1/7

    10/6/20

    IAPM

    PGP17

    1

    Day

    7

    TwopartargumentofAPT

    Tellsushowtogofromthemultifactormodeltoriskpremiums

    Twowelldiversifiedportfolioswiththesameshouldhavethesameexpectedreturn

    Arbitrage: Exploitation of asset mispricing in such a waythat risk-free rofits can be earned

    Conclusion:Expectedreturnonwelldiversifiedportfoliosmustlieonthestraightlinefromtheriskfreeasset(SML)

    2

  • 8/10/2019 Day7 Upload

    2/7

    10/6/20

    APTTheriskreturnrelationcanbeextendedfromwell

    diversifiedportfoliostoindividualassets.

    AsimilarargumentisusedtoestablishthemultifactorSML.

    TheriskpremiumsinamultifactorSMLarecomingfromfactorportfolios.

    Connections between the two equations in the first slide: Is

    the airline stock over priced or under priced?

    3

    Fama and

    French

    and

    the

    three

    factor

    model

    ResearchersEu eneFama andKenFrenchhavedoneextensiveresearchinthisarea

    Foundfactorsdescribingvalueandsizetobethemostsignificantfactors,outsideofmarketrisk,forexplainingtherealizedreturnsofpubliclytradedstocks(1992)

    To represent these risks, they constructed two factors: SMB Small Minus Big (firm size) to address size risk and HML High Minus Low (book-to-market ratio) to address value risk

    4

  • 8/10/2019 Day7 Upload

    3/7

    10/6/20

    Fama FrenchSMBisdesi nedtomeasuretheadditionalreturn

    investorshavehistoricallyreceivedbyinvestinginstocksofcompanieswithrelativelysmallmarketcapitalization.Thisadditionalreturnisoftenreferredtoasthesizepremium.

    In practice, the SMB monthly factor is computed as the

    average return of the largest 30% of stocks in that month.

    A positive SMB in a month indicates that small cap stocksoutperformed large cap stocks in that month.

    5

    HML

    HMLwhichisshortforHi hMinusLow hasbeenconstructedtomeasurethevaluepremiumprovidedtoinvestorsforinvestingincompanieswithhighbooktomarketvalues

    Constructed in a fashion similar to that of SMB, HML is

    computed as the average return for the 50% of stocks with

    stocks with the lowest B/M ratio each month.

    6

  • 8/10/2019 Day7 Upload

    4/7

    10/6/20

    Fama French

    re eser s ac ors

    Whatdoesthe3factorSMLlooklike?

    7

    ClassifyingFundsintoStyleBuckets The3factormodelprovidesawaytocategorizemutualfundsbythe

    sizeandvalueriskstowhichitsportfolioisexposed,andthusthereturnpremiumsexpected.

    8

  • 8/10/2019 Day7 Upload

    5/7

    10/6/20

    Fund

    evaluation

    in

    practice

    (using

    CAPM)

    Isa iven erformancehi herthanthebenchmark?

    TheLMVPfundreturned27.3%annuallyfromSeptember1998toDecember2002whilethemarketonlyreturned21.6%.

    The fund manager might claim the excess returns were due toher exceptional ability at picking stocks.

    9

    UseofSCL

    Usin historicalmonthl valuesforr r and r wecandeterminethevaluesof and usingtheSCL.

    Using rArf for the y-values and rMrf for the x-values in aregression, the following coefficients are returned:

    = 0.93

    = 0.46% per month

    i.e. the fund manager was able to add 46 basis points to thefunds return on a monthly basis or about 5.5% per year abovethe return expected from a portfolio with a beta of .93.

    Is this higher than benchmark return?

    10

  • 8/10/2019 Day7 Upload

    6/7

    10/6/20

    Thetstatisticassociatedwithal hais2. indicatin thatachievingsuchreturnswithoutskillwouldbeextremelyunlikely

    11

    Fund

    evaluation

    in

    practice

    (using

    Fama

    French)

    Wenowhaveanothertoolwithwhichtoscrutinizethemanagersclaim

    Utilize historic monthly values to build a regression usingrA,rM, rf, SMB, and HML . Regress rArf against rM rf, SMBand HML to determine the estimates of, M, S and V

    In this particular case, the following coefficients result:

    = .M= 0.99

    S = 0.36

    V = 0.22

    t-statistic for = 1.112

  • 8/10/2019 Day7 Upload

    7/7

    10/6/20

    Fund

    evaluation

    in

    practice Therelativelylowtstatisticof1.1,however,underminesthe

    managersclaimandindicatesthatthealphawasmorelikelytohavehappenedbychance(i.e.itisnotstatisticallydifferentfromzero) A high R2(0.92 in this case) tells us that the three factors explain all

    but 8% of the variation in historical returns, further lendingcredence to the findings.

    13

    Upshot:ApositivealphaobservedinaCAPMregression

    couldmerelybearesultofexposuretoeitherHMLorSMBfactors,ratherthanactualmanagerperformance.

    (Courtesy:KentWomacksteachingnote)