day session3 vision_adelphi
TRANSCRIPT
Know4DRR A vision towards the future Knowledge Management (Framework) Final Conference Day 2- Session 3 16:20-17:00
Nina Becker, Project Manager, adelphi
2
Final conference:
• Knowledge management for improving DRR/CAA
• state of the art, findings
• and steps forward
3
• Challenges
• Requirements
• Wishes
• Etc.
Please prepare 2 statements/ bullet points until tomorrow morning and return the handout before session 1 on Wednesday if possible.
Thank you!
What is your vision of a future Knowledge Management (Framework)?
4
What is your vision of a future Knowledge Management (Framework)? I
Statement Category Close link between DRR and CCA: needed ac4on Ac4on for linking CCA and DRR To make knowledge management transparent and understandable to different stakeholder groups. Challenge: the way of communica4ng the management of knowledge
Transparent and understandable KM: communica9on to stakeholder groups
To evaluate the impact of (improved) management of knowledge Evaluate knowledge and impacts of KM Risk management insitu4ons have to be considered in academic agendas during the knowledge building, sharing exper4se and barriers.
Consider RM ins4tu4ons by academic agendas
Do we need a 'Knowledge Management' Framework? -‐-‐> 'lessons learned' and 'Best prac4ces' draw from past experiences. -‐-‐> New threats and risks need crea4vity and transfer of knwoledge -‐-‐> rather speak of framework for people that allows then to be crea4ve and produc4ve as a sum of knowledge and experience
Crea4vity and knowledge transfer
One stop shop for DRR & CCA from global to con4nent to na4onal to regional scale Cross-‐scale DRR and CCA linkages Do not search for new solu4ons, new ways to collect and store informa4on. Indeed find ways to evaluate, connect, select the informa4on already available. Interoperability and integra4on are crucial.
Evaluate informa9on and knowledge
More field immersion is needed to inlcude local knwoeldge in prac4val knowledge and translate into wisdom
End-‐user/local needs and local knowledge: integra9on, par9cipa9on, collabora9on
The step from informa4on to knowledge needs involvement of end users at various levels (e.g. educa4on, focus groups etc..)
End-‐user/local needs and local knowledge: integra4on, par4cipa4on, collabora4on
Ac4ve social par4cipa4on: permanent feedbacks building a resilient society covering local needs
End-‐user/local needs and local knowledge: integra4on, par4cipa4on, collabora4on
5
What is your vision of a future Knowledge Management (Framework)? II
Move towards "top down solu4ons" (from experts to users) to collabora4on plaUorms where everybody can contribute. Dis4nc4on between experts and end users is vanishing. Everybody can and should contribute to the provision and exchange of informa4on.
End-‐user/local needs and local knowledge: integra4on, par4cipa4on, collabora4on
A 'space' where the stakeholders can have the opportunity to exchange and also crea4ng new knowledge in a very dynamic and collabora4ve context
End-‐user/local needs and local knowledge: integra4on, par4cipa4on, collabora4on
Importance of an increasing connec4on between the scien4st and the other stakeholder to have flows of knowledge producing collec4ve ac4ons on DRR
End-‐user/local needs and local knowledge: integra4on, par4cipa4on, collabora4on
KM must be flexible to integrate local/popular knowledge. End-‐user/local needs and local knowledge: integra4on, par4cipa4on, collabora4on
My vision is an open-‐access knowledge portal that does not only provide data and informa4on but also guidance and lessons learned (i.e. evaluated knowledge)
Evaluate knowledge
How have decisions been taken in the past that are known to have produced desirable, beneficial results? Is it possible to characterize “good” decision-‐making (criteria?) Which procedural, technical and cultural components in the decision-‐making process need to be considered as necessary/ vital for obtaining best-‐possible results? Can we provide generic guidelines that can also be implemented in an informa4on/knowledge management system
Guidelines for decision-‐making processes towards best results
The knowledge Management system should be supported by a chain of enabling IT systems designed to support the knowledge enhancing and co-‐produc4on of various communi4es of prac4ce
IT systems to support knowledge enhancing and co-‐produc4on
KM must be open source KM as open source Knowledge Management is context specific. It may only work within one community of prac4ce (no rules, no general toolkit, prac4ce for all occassions). But who decides? Is that a rule?
KM as a non-‐generic, non one fits all solu9on
Knowledge Management in DRR-‐CCA should be trailored to different communi4es of prac4ce. Not a 'general# knowledge management system.
KM cannot be generic and a one fits all solu4on
Strong necessity of crea4ng a fer4le environment for knwoeldge sharing : implement networking ac4vi4es
Network ac4vi4es for knowledge sharing
6
• Most statements addressed:
1) Transparent and understandable KM: how to communicate to different stakeholders?
2) Evaluate knowledge and impacts of KM
3) End-‐user/local needs and local knowledge: how to integrate, par4cipate, collaborate?
4) KM as a non-‐generic, non-‐one fits all solu4on: how to tailor to different communi4es of prac4ce?
What is your vision of a future Knowledge Management (Framework)?
7
Rotation Discussion • 4 groups will be formed: Count: Know-4-D-RR-Know-4-etc
• Each group moves to one flipchart assigned
• Discussions start • Discuss and write down in bullet points the main results in group
• Duration: 5 minutes
• Switch to next flipchart
• Add own views and comments to the results of former group(s)
• Use symbols
• ! = total agreement • ? = needs clarification • = objection/ disagreement
• Each group visits all flipcharts
• 5 minutes break and preparation of feedback
• Feedback in plenary of main consent, clarification and conflict issues (2 minutes each group)
• Open discussion and questions
What is your vision of a future Knowledge Management (Framework)?
8
Results: Group 1
Transparent and understandable KM: how to communicate to different stakeholders?
9
Results: Group 2 Evaluate knowledge and impacts of KM
10
Results: Group 3
End-‐user/local needs and local knowledge: how to integrate, par4cipate, collaborate?
11
Results: Group 4
KM as a non-‐generic, non-‐one fits all solu4on: how to tailor to different communi4es of prac4ce?
adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a 14193 Berlin
T +49 (0)30-89 000 68-0 F +49 (0)30-89 000 68-10
www.adelphi.de [email protected]
• Nina Becker • Project Manager • [email protected]