dawood hercules

59
Institute of Business Management, Karachi Financial Statement’s Analysis Analysis of “Dawood Hercules Chemicals Ltd.” In Comparison with Fertilizer Sector

Upload: nickchik

Post on 17-Nov-2014

121 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Institute of Business Management, Karachi

Financial Statement’s AnalysisAnalysis of “Dawood Hercules Chemicals Ltd.” In Comparison with Fertilizer Sector

Dear Sir

Attached is the term Report on Financial Statement Analysis of Dawood Hercules Chemicals Ltd. Along with the industry analysis of fertilizer sector. This report has been prepared as a course requirement for “Analysis of Financial Statement”. I have tried to meet your requirements and I hope you will find this report satisfactory.

As mentioned in the report, I have done the internal and external analysis of Dawood Hercules, with the help of financial ratio and various techniques we have learned throughout the course.

All financial data used is authentic, obtained from the website of the subject organization, financial statements are also attached.

Yours Sincerely

Contents

2

Fertilizer Sector Outlook.....................................................................................................................................................................5

Agriculture Sector............................................................................................................................................................................5

Types Of Fertilizer...........................................................................................................................................................................6

Global Scenario...............................................................................................................................................................................6

Pricing..............................................................................................................................................................................................9

Local Arena.................................................................................................................................................................................9

International versus Local..............................................................................................................................................................10

Urea Prices.................................................................................................................................................................................10

DAP Prices.....................................................................................................................................................................................11

Demand & Supply.........................................................................................................................................................................12

Taxes..............................................................................................................................................................................................13

The Dawood Group...........................................................................................................................................................................14

Dawood Hercules...............................................................................................................................................................................15

Vision & Mission...........................................................................................................................................................................15

Product Line...................................................................................................................................................................................16

Production Facilities......................................................................................................................................................................17

Technical Data...............................................................................................................................................................................17

Ratio Analysis (Internal & External Comparison)............................................................................................................................18

Financial Ratios of Dawood Hercules (2001-08)..........................................................................................................................18

Average of Financial Ratios of Fertilizer Sector...........................................................................................................................19

Analysis.....................................................................................................................................................................................20

Horizontal Indexed Income Statement (2001-08).........................................................................................................................23

Analysis.....................................................................................................................................................................................24

Horizontal Indexed Balance Sheet (2001-08)................................................................................................................................25

Analysis.....................................................................................................................................................................................27

Vertical Common Sized Income Statement (2001-08)..................................................................................................................28

Vertical Common Sized Balance Sheet (2001-08)........................................................................................................................29

Analysis.....................................................................................................................................................................................31

Horizontal YoY Rs. and % Analysis (2001-08)................................................................................................................................32

Horizontal YoY Income Statement Rs. Change (2001-08)...........................................................................................................32

Horizontal YoY Balance Sheet Rs. Change (2001-08).................................................................................................................33

Horizontal YoY Income Statement % Change (2001-08).............................................................................................................35

3

Horizontal YoY Balance Sheet % Change (2001-08)...................................................................................................................36

DuPont Return on Equity...................................................................................................................................................................38

Five Component Disaggregation...................................................................................................................................................38

Analysis.....................................................................................................................................................................................39

Conclusion and Recommendations....................................................................................................................................................40

Future Outlook & Insight for Investors.............................................................................................................................................40

References..........................................................................................................................................................................................41

Appendix............................................................................................................................................................................................42

PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT (PKR).....................................................................................................................................42

BALANCE SHEET (PKR)............................................................................................................................................................43

4

Fertilizer Sector Outlook

Agriculture Sector

The undeniable importance of the agriculture sector to the economy of Pakistan is reflected in its

contribution to national output, employment and export earnings. This sector contributes 22% to

the country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and employs 43% of total labor force. Growth in

this area of Economy is vital for poverty alleviation, as about 66 percent of rural population is

directly or indirectly dependent on the agriculture sector for sustenance. Pakistan’s major source

of foreign exchange earnings is the textile sector which also relies on agricultural performance.

The major crops of Pakistan are wheat, cotton, rice and sugarcane, which make up 7% of the

country’s GDP.

Fertilizer has a significant contribution in increasing crop yields and productivity. Proper

application of nutrients helps in efficient utilization of limited natural resources such as land and

water. Fertilizers improve crop yield by removing the deficiency of chemical elements taken

from the soil by harvesting, grazing, leaching or erosion. Coupled with improved seeds, better

insecticides and more effective fungicides, chemical fertilizers play a vital role in boosting

agricultural output. With proper farmer education and increased awareness, the fertilizer off-take

can improve substantially. Nutrient application in suitable quantities can further improve farm

productivity, thereby helping in eradicating poverty.

5

Types Of Fertilizer

Urea, which represents 65% of total fertilizer consumed and di-ammonium phosphate (DAP),

which accounts for 18%, are the main types of fertilizer used in Pakistan, but there is a total of

eight different fertilizer products which fall into three categories.

Urea, along with calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and ammonium sulphate (AS) together make

up almost three fourths of total fertilizer consumption and come under the nitrogenous category.

Under the phosphatic category which makes up about 27%, is DAP, triple super phosphate

(TSP), single super phosphate (SSP) and nitro phosphate (NP). And under the last category,

potassic is sulphate of potash which makes up only 1%. Since the soil in Pakistan generally

tends to be deficient in nitrogen, urea is the most used fertilizer. DAP is used, as most phosphatic

fertilizers are to counter the effect of the acidic urea and maintain levels of fertility in the soil.

Global Scenario

The world grain consumption has outpaced production in six of the last seven years, with 2005

being the only exception, in which production superseded supply due to favorable weather in

almost all the major grain producing countries. With the growing demand of food and rapid

increase in demand for biofuels, the grain consumption growth has witnessed an increase of 2%

in 2007 from the historical average rate of 1.2% p.a. This has led to a widening gap between

consumption and production resulting in sharp increase in food prices in the global market.

During 2007, total global production of grains was recorded at 2.3bn tons, up 4% YoY. Despite,

the increase in production the global commodity prices have climbed significantly during the

past twelve months on the back of rising demand from emerging economies. Corn, wheat, and

rice account for about 85% of the global grain harvest (in terms of weight), while sorghum,

millet, barley, oats, and other less common grains make up the rest. China, India, and the United

6

States alone account for 46% of global grain production; Europe, including the former Soviet

states, grow another 21%.

In 2007, a 200mn ton jump in the global coarse grain harvest was responsible for nearly all of the

increase in the total grain harvest. Production of coarse grains a group that includes corn, barley,

sorghum, and other grains fed mainly to animals increased 10% from 985mn tons in 2006 to

1,080mn tons in 2007. During 2007, a significant amount of global corn production was used in

producing biofuels, the use of which is being promoted in developed countries (mainly EU and

USA). Governments in developed countries have been encouraging the use of biofuels primarily

due to (1) Increasing price of international crude oil and (2) Bio-fuels are environment friendly.

Out of a total of 784mn tons of corn harvested during 2007, about 255mn tons or 32.5% was

used in extracting biofuels which has resulted in sharp increase in price of the commodity.

Higher corn prices prompted many a farmers in various countries (China, Brazil and the United

States) to switch to corn harvesting. Another major consumer of grains is the livestock sector,

which accounted for approximately 627mn tons (27%) in the form of feed for the cattle. Demand

of grains from this sector has grown rapidly over the past few years on account of higher

consumption of dairy products and meat by the developing countries especially China, India and

Brazil.

The amount of grain stored by governments, a good measure of the global cushion against poor

harvests and rising prices continues to decline. Global cereal stocks were expected to stand at

318mn tons by the close of the 2007 season, equivalent to about 14 percent of annual

consumption, lowest since many years. In comparison to the global scenario, Pakistan’s food

grain production has witnessed a rising trend over the years registering a 4-year CAGR (FY02-

06) of 5.7% on the back of good harvest of major crops (wheat & rice) which account for almost

84% of the total grain production of the country.

7

8

Pricing

Local Arena

Urea prices have shown a positive trend over the last few years on the back of step-wise increase

in feedstock gas prices, the primary raw-material for urea manufacturing. Government heavily

subsidizes feedstock prices in Pakistan, to keep the urea prices within affordable limits of the

farmers. A 50kg bag of urea is sold at PKR 558-565 (prices were revised upwards in Dec’07)

versus a price of approximately PKR 1000 per bag in the international market. DAP prices on the

other hand have undergone a radical increase during 2007, due to record high phosphoric acid

prices in the international market (a major raw material). Local prices of DAP are highly

correlated with their global rates since over 70% of the commodity used in the country is

imported. As a result, domestic DAP prices have surged during CY07, rising from PKR 800 per

bag at the start of the year to touch PKR 1,680 by Dec’07.

9

International versus Local

Urea Prices

International urea prices have escalated at a healthy 4-year CAGR (FY03-07) of 19.6%, driven

by its increased usage globally from 128mntpa in 2005 to 138mntpa in 2007. On the other hand

local urea prices have risen at a 4-year CAGR of 6.8% from FY03 to FY07. GOP heavily

subsidizes the feedstock gas prices in order to make available the fertilizer to the local farmers at

an affordable cost. Urea prices are primarily linked to the increase in feedstock gas prices, which

are expected to rise at a next 4-year CAGR of 11% going forward. Consequently we expect local

urea prices to increase at a 4-year CAGR of 5.5% for the period FY07-FY11.

10

DAP Prices

International DAP prices have risen sharply during 2007 (+143% YoY) on the back of rising

demand for the phosphatic fertilizer for harvesting of crops used in production of biofuels. In the

local market, price of DAP fertilizer too has followed suit and has gone up from PKR 873 per

50kg bag at the start of 2007 to around PKR 1,680 per bag at present. Despite the PKR 470 per

bag subsidy by the GOP, the hefty rise in DAP prices has caused its off-take to drop significantly

during the past few months with many farmers reverting to the use of urea. FFBL the only

producer of DAP and caters to only 31% of the DAP demand of Pakistan while the rest of the

demand is met through imports. Since the local prices are highly correlated to global prices we

estimate DAP prices to increase at a 4-year CAGR (CY07-11E) of 6.3%.

11

Demand & Supply

There are nine fertilizer plants in Pakistan with a total installed capacity of 4.35mn tons

including urea, Di-ammonium phosphate (DAP), single super phosphate (SSP), calcium

ammonium nitrate (CAN), nitro phosphate (NP) and ammonium sulfate (AS). Total demand of

these fertilizers is estimated to grow at an average of 4% per annum in the medium term. The

shortfall of approximately 1.1mntpa is met through import on which GOP provides subsidies.

During FY08, the GOP allocated a sum of PKR 13.5bn for import of various fertilizers.

The graph above shows the demand trend of both major fertilizers, urea and DAP, which has

increased at a 4-year CAGR (CY02-06) of 4.6% and 7.7% respectively. Given the increase in

crop prices, low per acre usage of fertilizers, increasing awareness among the farming

community and vast cultivable land, we estimate demand growth of fertilizers to average over

4% per annum over the next 4 years.

12

Taxes

The government has privatized and deregulated fertilizer imports and prices. In 1986, all

subsidies on nitrogenous fertilizers were abolished followed by phosphates in 1993 and potash in

1997. Provincial quotas were abolished, provincial supply organizations in the public sector

abandoned and import controls were lifted. All imports are affected by the private sector. In

2001, the government imposed a 15 percent general sales tax on all fertilizer products. Farmers

have to pay international prices for imported products, apart from urea.

The share of the private sector in fertilizer marketing is 89 percent, compared to 11 percent for

the public sector. The private sector handles about 90 percent of the urea and 100 percent of the

DAP, the two major fertilizer products consumed in the country. A dealer network of about 8

000 retailers exists in the country. Fertilizer companies select and train the dealers. There is no

government intervention. However, under ‘Fertilizer Acts’ promulgated by provinces, fertilizer

quality is monitored by the provincial governments.

13

The Dawood Group

The Dawood Group, a distinguished and trusted name in Pakistan, traces its origins back to almost a century ago. The Group

owns companies ranging from fertilizer, textiles, business and finance. Through its diverse businesses, the Dawood Group of

Companies delivers some of the top brands and the highest quality services. Most of the Group Companies consistently rank

amongst the top 25 companies of KSE. The Group comprises of the following companies

Dawood Hercules Chemicals

Dawood Lawrencepur

Central Insurance Company

Inbox Business Technologies

Elixir Securities

14

Dawood Hercules

Dawood Hercules Chemicals Limited was incorporated as a public limited company on 17th April 1968, as a joint venture

between Dawood Group of Industries and Hercules Inc. USA. It was the first private sector venture in Pakistan to receive a loan

from the World Bank and was the largest ammonia/urea plant in country at that time. Initially the plant's capacity was 345,000

metric tons of urea per annum. The plant was revamped in 1989 / 1991 to enhance the capacity to 445,500 metric tons of urea per

annum. Also, it made the manufacturing facilities more energy efficient and environment friendly.

In recent years, Dawood Hercules has made a colossal investment to incorporate the latest technology; the most significant are

the construction of new Prilling tower in a record time; the tallest industrial structure in Pakistan, replacement of Primary Waste

Heat Exchanger. Primary Reformer Harps Assemblies and conventional instrumentation (with Distributed Control System).

Dawood Hercules has the privilege of becoming the first fertilizer manufacturing company to obtain ISO-9000:2000 certification.

Vision & Mission

• To excel in the fertilizer and allied business at national and international level by  maintaining highest standards of product

quality thereby playing our role in the  development of the country's economy and adding value to the shareholders'  investment.

• To offer consistent dividends to the shareholders.

• To chalk out a plan to improve production techniques and quality standards.

• To provide career grooming opportunities to the talented professionals.

• To become a good corporate citizen.

• To develop long-term relationship with the employees.

• To create high performing Organizational Environment in which ideas are generated and nurtured.

15

• To inculcate honest and ethical behavior.

• To create safe, healthy environment and friendly atmosphere for the employees.

• To improve quality of life for the employees.

• To make the farmer community prosper.

16

Product Line

1. Product: Urea Fertilizer

Brand Name: “Bubber Sher”.

Product Chemical Name: Urea, Carbamide; Amide of Carbonic Acid

2. Product: Anhydrous Ammonia.Anhydrous Ammonia is provided for the manufacture of soda ash, fructose and other chemicals.

Product Chemical Name: Ammonia, Anhydrous Ammonia

Production Facilities

Dawood Hercules Plant is sited at the heart of the Punjab; the area of unparallel agricultural significance, surrounded by the belts

of rice, grain and wheat. Located near the historic city of Sheikhupura, about 28 Km from Lahore; Dawood Hercules Plant is the

biggest industry in terms of capital investment in the Lahore division.

The complex was constructed and commissioned on 13th November 1971. It was the third and the largest urea plant in the

Country at that time. Since then the manufacturing facilities have been frequently upgraded as per the need and demand of time.

17

In recent years, Dawood Hercules has made significant and rigorous investment which amounts to over $41 million in year 2006

alone to poise itself for the future challenges.

Technical Data

Ratio Analysis (Internal & External Comparison)

Financial Ratios of Dawood Hercules (2001-08)

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

LIQUIDITY                

Current Ratio 2.79 8.71 4.37 4.46 3.81 1.28 3.15 3.19

Quick Ratio 2.61 8.48 4.33 4.44 3.76 1.24 2.90 3.13

Cash Flow Liquidity Ratio 2.31 8.62 2.92 2.55 2.20 1.11 2.50 3.10

Average Collection Period 22.93 6.92 74.15 78.85 44.70 28.09 35.82 3.55

Average Inventory Days 22.93 24.67 19.67 13.23 29.56 33.70 100.57 7.58

Average Payable Days 77.28 105.52 142.04112.0

7 122.22 93.77 88.38 68.89

TURNOVER/EFFICIENCY                

Receivable Turnover 21.44 52.71 4.92 4.63 8.17 13.00 10.19 102.82

Inventory Turnover 12.96 12.96 12.96 12.96 12.96 12.96 12.96 12.96

Payable Turnover 4.72 3.46 2.57 3.26 2.99 3.89 4.13 5.30

18

Description Unit Design Specification

Plant Area    Acres 228

Urea Production Metric Tons Per Day  1,350

Ammonia Production Metric Tons Per Day 815

Bagging Capacity Metric Tons per day 1,800

Urea Storage Capacity Metric Tons 100,000

Urea Bulk Storage Capacity Metric ton 5000

Ammonia Storage Capacity Metric Tons 4,000

Electricity Generation Mega Watts 15

Cooling Water Circulation Gallons per minute 75000

Natural Gas Consumption Million Cubic Feet per day 44.23

Fixed Asset Turnover 7.74 9.45 7.29 5.09 4.77 2.88 3.65 5.32

Total Asset Turnover 0.65 0.55 0.33 0.22 0.26 0.24 0.17 0.29

SOLVENCY/LEVERAGE                

Debt Ratio 19% 12% 30% 36% 27% 43% 35% 32%Long Term Debt To Capitalization Ratio 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 26% 27%

Debt To Equity Ratio 1.24 1.13 1.43 1.57 1.37 1.74 1.55 1.47

COVERAGE                 

Times Interest Earned 41.09 966.14 25.44 7.89 4.10 1.94 2.08 -3.02

Cash Coverage Ratio 52.84 1027.40 66.54 8.38 4.33 2.12 1.35 3.84

Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio 41.09 966.14 25.44 7.89 4.10 1.94 2.08 -3.02

Cash Flow Adequacy Ratio 0.91 0.92 0.75 0.49 0.56 0.18 -0.08 2.94

PROFTABILITY                

Gross Profit Margin 26% 36% 36% 30% 38% 34% 37% 42%

Operating Margin 21% 32% 30% 24% 32% 28% 31% 37%

Net Profit Margin 21% 28% 46% 46% 87% 53% 202% 41%

Cash Flow Margin 15% 24% 20% 13% 18% 6% -1% 23%

Return On Asset 14% 16% 15% 10% 22% 13% 35% 12%

Return On Equity 17% 18% 22% 16% 31% 22% 54% 18%

Cash Return On Asset 9% 13% 6% 3% 5% 1% 0% 7%

MARKET                 

Earnings Per Share 12.38 11.01 19.13 17.21 39.8 24.79 122.3 28

Price to Earning  5.9 12.17 9.18 11.42 7.4 11.9 4.25 7.87

Dividend Payout 80.78 86.29 52.26 61.01 24.56 32.27 3.24 8.93

Dividend Yield 13.7 7.09 5.69 5.34 3.32 2.71 0.76 1.13

Average of Financial Ratios of Fertilizer Sector

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

LIQUIDITYCurrent Ratio 1.62 2.94 2.09 2.15 1.99 1.27 2.09 1.91

Quick Ratio 1.45 2.72 1.90 2.01 1.67 1.08 1.81 1.59

Cash Flow Liquidity Ratio 1.28 2.67 1.71 1.76 1.50 0.88 1.49 1.09

Average Collection Period 25.37 26.73 40.54 32.76 17.97 14.21 21.71 4.28

Average Inventory Days 38.97 35.89 23.77 17.45 32.73 31.83 53.75 48.08

Average Payable Days 64.65 58.34 84.20 89.51 95.18 67.83 83.75 72.04

TURNOVER/EFFICIENCY

Receivables Turnover 16.36 23.00 11.28 17.97 33.15 39.33 23.67 88.76

Inventory Turnover 10.18 11.84 16.20 29.72 15.68 13.37 14.44 23.16

Payable Turnover 7.36 7.02 9.12 10.73 7.56 9.69 12.51 14.33

Fixed Asset Turnover 4.25 3.18 2.84 2.41 2.63 2.17 2.05 2.48

Total Asset Turnover 0.63 0.53 0.58 0.63 0.76 0.74 0.54 0.55

19

SOLVENCY/LEVERAGE

Debt Ratio 27.28% 54.00% 53.17% 51.83% 49.85% 51.48% 55.49% 58.25%

Long Term Debt To Capitalization 12.88% 30.01% 25.18% 24.76% 20.86% 16.89% 33.47% 36.16%

Debt To Equity Ratio 92.07% 135.56% 109.79% 91.43% 92.33% 79.42% 121.75% 129.36%

COVERAGE

Times Interest Earned 20.16 5.93 11.53 15.58 11.56 7.77 6.22 4.92

Cash Coverage Ratio 23.31 8.30 27.25 13.43 13.23 4.96 8.29 7.50

Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio 23.88 486.61 14.67 14.10 11.52 0.57 5.24 4.36

Cash Flow Adequacy Ratio 0.76 1.12 0.76 1.52 1.05 0.25 0.25 1.22

PROFTABILITY

Gross Profit Margin 30.10% 33.64% 31.16% 30.43% 31.85% 30.53% 33.34% 34.90%

Operating Margin 17.53% 23.85% 21.69% 22.53% 23.84% 22.02% 25.54% 27.78%

Net Profit Margin 2.25% 21.39% 24.30% 23.39% 34.07% 24.87% 63.86% 22.90%

Cash Flow Margin 12.19% 15.65% 19.96% 21.88% 19.88% 6.86% 14.07% 3.42%

Return On Asset 9.49% 12.49% 12.81% 12.91% 17.65% 15.30% 19.17% 13.68%

Return On Equity 17.71% 24.30% 24.10% 24.62% 33.29% 28.44% 36.50% 29.20%

Cash Return On Asset 8.50% 8.36% 10.39% 8.88% 8.31% 8.98% 7.30% -2.89%

MARKET

Earnings Per Share 11.46 14.87 18.36 17.36 28.25 24.67 51.14 31.58

Price to Earning 4.12 7.00 9.24 10.60 8.46 8.69 7.58 4.86

Dividend Payout 82.48% 85.94% 65.29% 64.24% 64.04% 61.82% 44.99% 43.37%

Dividend Yield 12.75% 7.30% 7.10% 29.97% 5.01% 16.19% 1.68% 3.60%

Analysis

Considering the liquidity trend of DH we can observe there is not much difference between the current and quick for

a particular year throughout the period of eight years, it shows the efficient inventory management of the firm,

however a sudden increase in the current and quick ratio in the CY02 can be seen, such a change is not observed in

the sector as a whole, the reason given is the 69% increase in cash and bank balance alone amongst the current

assets and. The figures are further aggravated upward because of 39% decrease in current liabilities as compared to

the figures of 2001. CY04 on wards the liquidity of the firm has been declining but stability can be seen during the

CY07 and CY08 which is a good sign.

Comparing the liquidity of DH with the industry average, DH has always remained much ahead of the sector

throughout the eight years except for the CY06, which is due to the 100% decrease in the prepayments in the form

of advance income tax and the cash, the prepayments decreased by PKR 4.7 bill and cash decreased by PKR 6.3 bill

in CY06 as compared to CY05.

20

The average collection period of DH shows a declining trend from CY01 to CY02, in effect in the CY02 ACPD had

declined to even 7 days, which was much below the industry average. It is important to note that this reduction in

average collection period is not because of the increase in sales but it is due to the decrease in receivables and the

increase ACPD after CY02 is because of the

credit sales which has increased by 6% in CY03

compared to that of CY02. During the CY03

and CY04 the ACPD remained between 74 to

80 days, however due to efficient credit

recovery policy then followed by the

organization resulted in substantial decrease in

the collection period but still the figure

remained well above the industry average. In

the CY08 DH, following its efficient credit

recovery policy managed to decrease its

collection period to the industry level, that is 5 days. It is evident from the graph above that managing inventory had

never been a problem for DH as compared to the industry throughout CY01 to CY08 except for the CY07 when

AID of DH reached up to 100 days, it was majorly because of increase in stocks by more then twice, but the sales

and cost of goods has not increased by such proportion. Average payable days of DH has also been high as

compared to the industry average from CY01 to CY07 but during the CY08 payable in days became almost at par

with industry which is an alarming sign.

Fixed asset turnover has been of DH has been the highest

with in the industry, we can observe an abnormal increase

in FATO in CY02 this is basically due to a 19 % decrease

in FA of the firm , however since then the firm’s FA has

been increasing compared to each preceding year. In

CY06 the FATO remained the lowest of all the eight

years, it is because of the 95% increase in the FA of the

firm. For the CY 01 and CY02 the TATO of DH

remained at par with the industry average, however due to

good liquidity status of the firm it remained below the

industry average from CY05 to CY08.

The solvency ratio of DH indicates that firms capital

structure is not inclined towards debt as much as that of the

industry, the debt ratio of the industry has always been more

that the debt ratio of DH. However debt to equity ratio of

DH has been greater than the debt-equity ratio of the

industry, we can observe that in CY06 the debt ratio of DH

reached the highest it is because of the 1888% increase in

21

long term borrowing, also we should keep in mind that this is the year when company initiated a BMR project to enhance its

capacity so that it can meet the arising challenges, it is well reflected by the fact that the debt ratio declines afterwards. The debt

ratio of the industry appears to be rising from CY06 to CY08; it means that the need for expansion is taken by the industry after

the initiative of DH.

The return on asset of DH has been greater then the return on asset of the industry from CY01- CY03 but we seen decline in the

ROA of DH during the CY04, it is because of the sharp

increase in receivables and a slight decline in sales. The firm

quickly responded the situation and we see an opposite

situation altogether in the CY05 and CY07.

DH’s return on equity had never been fascinating as

compared to the industry average except for the CY07 which

is because of the 393% increase in net income during that

year. However the situation could not remain likewise during

the CY08 and the reason for that were 70% decrease in net

income and 900% dilution in share holder’s equity- that is

the firm issued further 9000 shares of common stock in

CY08.

Operating and Net Profit Margins has kept on fluctuating

throughout the analysis horizon. The potential reasons being the

economic cycle, input prices and the demand for the product. A

clear trend can be observed is of relatively stable operating margin

while ups and downs in the NPM. This could be the effect of

fluctuating finance costs while applicability of different tax

deductible policies adopted by the firm during the different years.

However the OM is following the upward trend for the past three

years. OM is generally being improved during the eight years as

was observed 21% in CY01. Although during CY04, 24% is aloof

from the trend. NPM is also following the improving trend during the years. When compared with industry average, DH is far

ahead from the trend on both the aspects. This shows better efficiency and productivity of the firm.

When seeing towards cash flow ratios, we see that cash coverage ratio was better at the start of the decade but declined severely

during the years but has adopted a stable trend during the recent years. While fixed charge ratios for the company is on the same

trend. In fact during CY08, it went negative, which is not good for the company. Cash flow adequacy ratio too has been declining

and even went negative during the years but was adequate in 2008. The analysis of cash flows show a problem on the cash flow

health of the firm and indicate that firm is not generating the required cash to finance its liabilities.

22

EPS has been somewhat stable during the analysis

horizon except in CY07. The relative fluctuation is due

to the different operating performances of the firm

during the different years. P/E ratios too have been

following the same trend b/c of fluctuating EPS and

stock market trends during the era. However EPS has

generally improved during the years and P/E too. This

shows the confidence of investors on the DH stock.

When compared with the industry average, DH is again

far ahead with the trend in EPS aspect. While P/E ratio

of the industry at first rises till CY04 and then declines

thereafter. Such a trend is not observed in DH ratios.

As far as payout ratio is concerned, DH is retaining its earnings

more than previous years, i.e., its payout ratio is on the declining

trend. The potential causes would be the retention for further

expansions, BMR requirements ahead, etc. While the industry is

paying its shareholders at a stable trend. In other words, industry is

better in paying off its shareholders.

23

Horizontal Indexed Income Statement (2001-08)

24

PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Sales 100% 99% 105% 95% 115% 115% 176% 261%

Cost of Goods Sold 100% 85% 91% 89% 96% 96% 150% 205%

Gross Profit 100% 135% 142% 110% 169% 169% 250% 418%

Selling and Administrative Expenses 100% 88% 122% 117% 144% 144% 207% -277%

Operating Profit 100% 147% 147% 108% 175% 175% 260% 451%

Financial ChargesRealized gain on disposal of investment in associate

Other Income 100% 109% 315% 199% 627% 627% 140% 180%

Profit For The Year 100% 135% 197% 128% 290% 290% 1111% 263%Impairment on available for sale investments

Other Charges 100% 99% 92% 61% 86% 86% 114% -282%

Profit before Taxation 100% 138% 205% 210% 434% 434% 1352% 249%

Provision for Taxation 100% 148% 135% 98% 146% 146% 435% -367%

Profit after Taxation 100% 133% 232% 209% 482% 482% 1704% 515%

Earnings Per Share 100% 89% 155% 139% 321% 321% 988% 226%

Analysis

Over the years, it has been seen that till CY04 a constant trend is seen. Then the revenues are on the rising trend with more than

doubled in 2008 – the most successful year for the company. Compared with COGS, revenues are on the rising trend relative to

the cost of sales. That’s why GP increased at a higher trend than COGS.

Selling and admin expenses have increased but have not deteriorated the operating profits for the company. OP are too rising at a

higher trend. Then PBT was on the rising trend till 2007 then declined suddenly in 2008 but this seem adequate because a rising

trend cannot be continued forever. Due to the increase in earnings, the company has to pay higher taxes too. But the company has

opted such policies for taxation so that there would be less deteriorating effect on EAT. Lastly, EPS has kept on fluctuating as the

trend for EAT.

25

Horizontal Indexed Balance Sheet (2001-08)

26

BALANCE SHEET

LIABILITIES 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Authorized Capital100,000,000 ordinary shares of Rs.10 each 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 900%

Issued, subscribed and paid up capital 100% 0% 50% 50% 50% 73% 73% 128%

Capital reserve for plant BMR 100% 0% 0% -100% -100% -100% -100% -100%

Reserve for bonus shares

Revenue reserves 100% -13% 10% -100% -100% 187% 525% 615%

Fair value reserve on investments                

100% 27% 80% 122% 165% 162% 434% 392%

Non Current Liablities

Long Term Loans

Deferred taxation 100% -105% -89% 199% 216% 1064% 1300% 2114%

Retirement and other service benefits 100% 9% -43% -41% -45% -37% -27% -45%

100% 795% 389% 891% 896% 2391% 77200% 76168%

Current Liabilities

Short term financing - Secured                

Creditors, accrued and other liabilities 100% 17% 68% 23% 42% 10% 15% 21%

Markup payable on secured loans                

100% 17% 68% 30% 53% 48% 71% 83%

Provision for taxation

Proposed dividend 100% -100% -54% -100% -100% -100% -100% -100%

Total Current liabilities 100% -31% 255% 554% 431% 780% 371% 108%

Total Liabilities 100% -29% 223% 428% 306% 715% 1122% 876%

Contingencies and Commitments    

100% 16% 108% 181% 192% 269% 567% 485%

27

ASSETS 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Fixed Assets

At cost less accumulated depreciation 100% -19% -32% 39% 25% 245% 223% 261%

Capital work in progress

100% -19% 11% 44% 87% 266% 273% 279%

Long Term Investments 100% -87% -85% -89% -70% -67% -12% 2%

Long Term Loans and Advances 100% 20% 44% 1656% -3% 1825% 67% -100%

Deferred taxation

Deferred Costs 100% 18% 73% -100% -100% -100% -100% -100%

Current Assets

Stores, spares and loose tools 100% 7% 31% 13% 30% 52% 79% 106%

Stocks 100% -8% -22% -48% 24% 79% 556% -32%

Trade debtors 100% -7% -27% 23% -49% -67% -37% 17%Loans, advances, prepayments and other rec. 100% -60% 127% 339% 203% 125% 270% -46%

Advance income tax

Short term investments

Cash and bank balances 100% 69% 338% 628% 375% -96% -18% -30%

Total Current Assets 100% 115% 457% 824% 503% 303% 432% 138%

Total Assets 100% 16% 108% 181% 192% 269% 567% 485%

Analysis

SHE has following a rising trend but the prime factor behind that is revenue reserve. Issued and paid-up capital at first has risen

but then declined because of the purchase of treasury stock. BMR reserve has been finished after the restructuring of the plant in

2005.

The company has financed primarily on long term debt during the recent years due to the tax advantage and unstable stock

market conditions. Deferred taxation has been excessive during the current years which too added on the non-current liabilities

section of the balance sheet. Current liabilities have been very stable during the years.

When looking at the left side of the balance sheet, the firm has kept on increasing its fixed assets. The company has ended its

long term investments, long term loans and advances and deferred costs while focusing more on current assets to avoid

redundancy. Receivables and inventory has been properly managed while cash balances were also declining for the firm , which

is alarming as discussed previously.

28

29

Vertical Common Sized Income Statement (2001-08)

30

PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Sales 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

Cost of Goods Sold 73.85% 64.06% 64.47% 69.70% 61.71% 66.21% 62.83% 58.05%

Gross Profit 26.15% 35.94% 35.53% 30.30% 38.29% 33.79% 37.17% 41.95%

Selling and Administrative Expenses 4.93% 4.38% 5.76% 6.11% 6.15% 6.08% 5.80% 234.02%

Operating Profit 21.22% 31.56% 29.78% 24.18% 32.14% 27.70% 31.36% 36.70%

Financial Charges 0.03% 1.17% 3.07% 7.84% 14.31% 15.08% 12.13%Realized gain on disposal of investment in associate 172.79%

Other Income 9.93% 34.94% 100.46% 86.35% 167.93% 97.39% 25.15% 18.69%

Profit For The Year 31.15% 42.56% 58.52% 42.00% 78.26% 40.37% 196.96% 31.43%

Impairment on available for sale investments 1.35%

Other Charges 23.07% 20.84% 6.73% 7.08% 3.18% 6.73% 18.82% -36.09%

Profit before Taxation 28.86% 40.26% 56.51% 63.95% 108.43% 66.71% 222.03% 27.60%

Provision for Taxation 8.00% 12.03% 10.29% 8.28% 10.11% 13.79% 19.79% -11.28%

Profit after Taxation 20.86% 28.23% 46.22% 45.95% 87.16% 52.92% 202.24% 41.23%

Earnings Per Share                

Vertical Common Sized Balance Sheet (2001-08)

BALANCE SHEET

LIABILITIES 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Authorized Capital

100,000,000 ordinary shares of Rs.10 each 22.83% 19.65% 10.99% 8.13% 7.82% 6.19% 3.42% 39.02%

Issued, subscribed and paid up capital 10.97% 9.44% 7.92% 5.86% 5.64% 5.13% 2.84% 4.27%

Capital reserve for plant BMR 4.57% 3.93% 2.20%

Reserve for bonus shares 4.72% 37.54% 52.62%

Revenue reserves 65.17% 48.75% 34.50% 50.76% 61.05% 79.65%

Fair value reserve on investments   21.40% 25.35% 20.30% 14.91% 1.49% 0.75% -16.10%

80.70% 88.24% 69.97% 63.69% 73.16% 57.37% 64.64% 67.82%

Non Current Liabilities

Long Term Loans             22.24% 24.59%

Deferred taxation 0.34% -0.01% 0.02% 0.36% 0.37% 1.07% 0.71% 1.28%

Retirement and other service benefits 1.66% 1.55% 0.45% 0.35% 0.32% 0.28% 0.18% 0.16%

0.20% 1.54% 0.47% 0.70% 0.68% 1.35% 23.13% 26.03%

Short term financing - Secured     19.75% 29.44% 18.26% 36.66% 7.81% 0.27%

Creditors, accrued and other liabilities 10.18% 10.23% 8.23% 4.47% 4.94% 3.03% 1.76% 2.10%

Markup payable on secured loans       0.23% 0.38% 1.05% 0.85% 1.08%

10.18% 10.23% 8.23% 4.70% 5.32% 4.09% 2.61% 3.18%

Provision for taxation 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.47% 2.58% 0.54% 1.81% 2.70%

Proposed dividend 7.13% 0.00% 1.58%          

Total Current liabilities 17.30% 10.23% 29.56% 40.30% 31.47% 41.28% 12.23% 6.15%

Total Liabilities 19.30% 11.76% 30.03% 36.31% 26.84% 42.63% 35.36% 32.18%

Liabilities & SHE 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

31

ASSETS2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Fixed Assets 8.41% 5.83% 2.74% 4.17% 3.61% 7.87% 4.07% 5.18%

At cost less accumulated depreciation 0.00% 0.01% 1.76% 0.14% 1.78% 0.47% 0.63% 0.26%

Capital work in progress 8.41% 5.84% 4.50% 4.31% 5.40% 8.34% 4.70% 5.45%

430.78% 48.87% 30.31% 16.27% 44.83% 38.93% 56.84% 74.93%

Long Term Investments 0.02% 0.02% 0.01% 0.09% 0.01% 0.08%

Long Term Loans and Advances 0.01%

deferred taxation 0.71% 0.72% 0.59%

Deferred CostsCurrent Assets 11.38% 10.50% 7.15% 4.59% 5.06% 4.70% 3.06% 4.00%

Stores, spares and loose tools 3.02% 2.39% 1.14% 0.55% 1.29% 1.47% 2.97% 0.35%

Stocks 0.17% 0.14% 0.06% 0.08% 0.03% 0.02% 0.02% 0.03%

Trade debtors 3.04% 1.05% 3.31% 4.74% 3.15% 1.85% 1.68% 0.28%Loans, advances, prepayments and other rec. 37.69% 60.64% 37.12% 2.59%

Advance income tax 30.47% 15.23% 8.72% 3.12% 44.27% 26.97% 8.71%

Short term investments 30.59% 44.55% 64.58% 79.32% 49.77% 0.35% 3.76% 3.64%

Cash and bank balances 48.20% 89.09% 129.16% 158.65% 99.53% 52.65% 38.45% 19.61%

Total Current Assets 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

Total Assets

32

Analysis

Vertical analysis of income statement shows the clear picture of the firm. COGS have been declining and responsible for the

improvement of GP. It shows the operating efficiency for the firm. S & A expenses have risen slightly over the years. PBT has

been fluctuating due to the extraordinary items on the income statement. However, finance costs have increased substantially.

Taxation has been different during the different years and hence no conclusion can be deduced from the trend because of the

different policies opted by the firm to avoid as much as possible from this expense.

Vertical analysis of balance sheet depicts a declining trend of SHE on the balance sheet. Non-current liabilities have been

increased due to financing of the company’s operations by that door. Current liabilities show a declining trend as clear in the

decline in current assets section of the balance sheet.

Fixed assets have increased during the years while current assets have decreased on the other side. The company has restructures

itself during CY05.

33

Horizontal YoY Rs. and % Analysis (2001-08)

Horizontal YoY Income Statement Rs. Change (2001-08)

PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Sales 2,850,669,632 -40,748,393 173,453,569 -284,239,502 591,412,036 591,202,353 1,129,252,554 4,578,033,247

Cost of Goods Sold 2,105,273,076-

305,292,725 123,316,720 -41,907,325 149,213,644 539,642,777 578,304,546 2,207,189,883

Gross Profit 745,396,556 264,544,332 50,136,849 -242,332,177 442,198,392 51,559,576 550,948,008 2,370,843,364

Selling and Administrative Expenses 140,519,364 -17,521,336 48,731,525 -6,729,884 37,523,200 33,606,214 54,750,792 -530,366,153

Operating Profit 604,877,192 282,065,668 1,405,324 -235,602,293 404,675,192 17,953,362 496,197,216 2,121,515,939

Financial Charges 0 918,028 34,002,787 47,855,235 175,283,166 297,410,063 200,371,381 -901,450,815Realized gain on disposal of investment in associate 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,658,697,711 0

Other Income 283,132,290 26,721,768 582,575,547 -328,791,383 1,212,139,142 -728,516,958 -652,019,488 226,459,135

Profit For The Year 888,009,482 307,869,408 549,978,084 -612,248,911 1,441,531,168-

1,007,973,659 8,302,504,058 1,446,524,259

Impairment on available for sale investments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -100,310,990

Other Charges 65,329,982 -749,915 -4,523,573 -20,168,074 16,612,623 14,007,215 3,862,533 -249,264,429

Profit before Taxation 822,679,500 308,619,323 554,501,657 40,191,600 1,841,972,306 -978,380,534 8,536,482,082 1,227,608,804

Provision for Taxation 228,000,000 110,000,000 -31,000,000 -83,400,000 109,000,000 202,777,058 456,242,352-

1,065,800,000

Profit after Taxation 594,679,500 198,619,323 585,501,657 -138,665,555 1,627,810,030 -813,738,161 8,080,239,730 2,468,008,757

Earnings Per Share 12.38 -1.37 8.12 -1.92 22.59 -15.01 97.51 15.62

34

Horizontal YoY Balance Sheet Rs. Change (2001-08)

LIABILITIES 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Authorized Capital100,000,000 ordinary shares of Rs.10 each 1,000,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,000,000,000

Issued, subscribed and paid up capital 480,384,000 0 240,192,000 0 0 108,086,400 0 613,450,360

Capital reserve for plant BMR 200000000 0 0 -200000000

Reserve for bonus shares 0 240192000 2111340155 0

Revenue reserves 2,854,329,257 -373,774,873 658,224,480 9,637,249,084 17,561,067,070

Fair value reserve on investments 0 1088826650 1217308742 190285118 -590182096 -1666126730 -21060857 -4126573941

3,534,713,257 955,243,777 1,875,533,222 1,468,591,339 1,521,158,059 -82,095,776 9,616,188,227 13,847,943,489

Non Current Liabilities

Long Term Loans 0             6302500000

Deferred taxation 14,800,000 -15,500,000 2,300,000 42,600,000 2,600,000 125,400,000 35,000,000 312,900,000

Retirement and other service benefits 72,655,897 6,285,603 -37,763,561 1,330,852 -2,209,712 5,394,003 7,660,725 -32,493,378

8,745,897 69,495,603 -35,463,561 43,930,852 390,288 130,794,003 6,542,660,725 6,661,616,622

Short term financing - Secured 0     1823401690 -1285684959 3589614296 -3643086456 70139213

Creditors, accrued and other liabilities 445,713,608 74,666,010 228,059,028 -198,583,338 81,835,934 -141,245,230 22,507,287 92,419,087

Markup payable on secured loans 0 0 0 27790383 20448897 121654229 79542572 275848576

445,713,608 74,666,010 228,059,028 -170,792,955 102,284,831 -19,591,001 102,049,859 368,267,663

Provision for taxation 0 0 0 181000000 149000000 -243200000 442200000 693000000

Proposed dividend 312,249,600 -312,249,600 144,115,200 -144,115,200 0 0 0 -312,249,600

Total Current liabilities 757,963,208 -237,583,590 2,169,357,766 2,267,139,226 -932,115,297 2,646,892,773 -3,098,836,597 819,157,276

Total Liabilities 845,419,105 -246,797,987 2,133,894,205 1,733,424,387 -1,034,009,840 3,457,617,298 3,443,824,128 7,402,063,898

4,380,132,362 708,445,790 4,009,427,427 3,202,015,726 487,148,219 3,375,521,522 13,060,012,355 21,250,007,387

35

ASSETS 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Fixed Assets

At cost less accumulated depreciation 368381929 -71730472 -47302198 263435473 -50684878 809831955 -83267437 960398046

Capital work in progress 0 555008 159578666 -142470984 210536977 -152757223 109921817 67553966

368381929 -71175464 112276468 120964489 159852099 657074732 26654380 1027952012

Long Term Investments 18868700000 -16381690246 270990841 -757043985 3731646089 559784166 10317868658 336928008

Long Term Loans and Advances 665085 133290 156510 10724325 -11035400 12155805 -11686490 -665085

defered taxation 0 700000 -700000 0 0 0 0 1259750

Deferred Costs 31219029 5615225 17241579 -54075833 0 0 0 -31219029

Current Assets

Stores, spares and loose tools 498401954 35998676 116055005 -85547054 81601318 113442473 133301695 527362682

Stocks 132262395 -10625860 -17996780 -35460266 96252959 72862986 630215154 -42694179

Trade debtors 7569876 -521145 -1559654 3848459 -5487192 -1347495 2239634 1251391Loans, advances, prepayments and other rec. 132958546 -79647695 248066085 281689992 -180083261 -104276749 193044473 -60707125

Advance income tax 0 4030156849 -2711962850 -4746928000 0 663149343

Short term investments 0 1550332557 -164536628 -313241250 -673635543 6756459039 726845301 2233424979

Cash and bank balances 1339973548 926755756 3608762029 3881446730 -3393314569 -6307328929 1041529550 -406035360

Total Current Assets 2111166319 2422292289 7217524058 7762893460 -6786629138 -4217116675 2727175807 2915751731

Total Assets 4,380,132,362 708,445,790 4,009,427,427 3,202,015,726 487,148,219 3,375,521,522 13,060,012,355 21,250,007,387

36

Horizontal YoY Income Statement % Change (2001-08)

37

PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Sales 100% -1% 6% -10% 22% 18% 29% 48%

Cost of Goods Sold 100% -15% 7% -2% 8% 27% 22% 37%

Gross Profit 100% 35% 5% -23% 54% 4% 42% 67%

Selling and Administrative Expenses 100% -12% 40% -4% 23% 17% 23% 234%

Operating Profit 100% 47% 0% -27% 62% 2% 46% 73%

Financial Charges 3704% 137% 212% 115% 36% 219%Realized gain on disposal of investment in associate -100%

Other Income 100% 9% 188% -37% 215% -41% -62% 29%

Profit For The Year 100% 35% 46% -35% 127% -39% 530% -76%

Impairment on available for sale investments

Other Charges 100% -1% -7% -34% 42% 25% 5% 347%

Profit before Taxation 100% 38% 49% 2% 107% -27% 330% -82%

Provision for Taxation 100% 48% -9% -27% 49% 61% 85% -184%

Profit after Taxation 100% 33% 74% -10% 131% -28% 393% -70%

Earnings Per Share 100% -11% 74% -10% 131% -38% 393% -77%

Horizontal YoY Balance Sheet % Change (2001-08)

LIABILITIES 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008Authorized Capital

100,000,000 ordinary shares of Rs.10 each 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 900%

Issued, subscribed and paid up capital 100% 0% 50% 0% 0% 15% 0% 32%

Capital reserve for plant BMR 100% 0% 0%Reserve for bonus shares 46%

Revenue reserves 100% -13% 27% 117% 14%

Fair value reserve on investments     112% 8% -24% -87% -9% -1984%

100% 27% 42% 23% 19% -1% 104% -8%

Non Current Liabilities

Long Term Loans               -3%Deferred taxation 100% -105% -329% 2663% 6% 268% 20% 58%

Retirement and other service benefits 100% 9% -48% 3% -5% 13% 17% -25%

100% 795% -45% 103% 0% 150% 3003% -1%

Short term financing - Secured       101% -36% 154% -61% -97%

Creditors, accrued and other liabilities 100% 17% 44% -27% 15% -22% 5% 5%

Markup payable on secured loans         74% 252% 47% 11%

100% 17% 44% -23% 18% -3% 15% 7%Provision for taxation 82% -74% 509% 31%

Proposed dividend 100% -100%   -100%        Total Current liabilities 100% -31% 417% 84% -19% 66% -46% -56%Total Liabilities 100% -29% 356% 63% -23% 101% 50% -20%

               

Liability & SHE 100% 16% 79% 35% 4% 26% 81% -12%

ASSETS 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

38

Fixed Assets

At cost less accumulated depreciation 100% -19% -16% 106% -10% 175% -7% 12%

Capital work in progress     28752% -89% 1192% -67% 146% -64%

100% -19% 38% 30% 30% 95% 2% 2%

Long Term Investments 100% -87% 11% -27% 186% 10% 164% 16%

Long Term Loans and Advances 100% 20% 20% 1123% -94% 1888% -91% -100%

deferred taxation -100%

Deferred Costs 100% 18% 47% -100%Current Assets

Stores, spares and loose tools 100% 7% 22% -13% 14% 18% 18% 15%

Stocks 100% -8% -15% -34% 141% 44% 266% -90%

Trade debtors 100% -7% -22% 70% -59% -35% 89% 86%

Loans, advances, prepayments and other rec. 100% -60% 465% 93% -31% -26% 65% -85%

Advance income tax 118% -36% -100%

Short term investments -11% -23% -63% 1694% 10% -72%

Cash and bank balances 100% 69% 159% 66% -35% -99% 1850% -15%

Total Current Assets 100% 115% 159% 66% -35% -33% 32% -55%

Total Assets 100% 16% 79% 35% 4% 26% 81% -12%

39

DuPont Return on Equity

Five Component Disaggregation

                 

  Profitability Turnover   Solvency ROE

  Taxes Financing Operations          

  N.I/EBT EBT/EBIT EBIT/Sales N.I/Sales Sales/Avg. T.A N.I/Avg. T.A Avg. T.A/Avg. S.E N.I/Avg. S.E

2001 0.722856835 1.360076906 21.22% 20.86% 0.6508181 13.58% 1.239176149 16.82%

2002 0.701228364 1.275503614 31.56% 28.23% 0.5522016 15.59% 1.133324465 17.67%

2003 0.817890668 1.897679885 29.78% 46.22% 0.3279153 15.15% 2.026301256 21.66%

2004 0.718505571 2.644202137 24.18% 45.95% 0.2194415 10.08% 1.570065509 15.83%

2005 0.803804255 3.374213398 32.14% 87.16% 0.257332 22.43% 1.366845746 30.66%

2006 0.793257493 2.408076428 27.70% 52.92% 0.2401673 12.71% 1.742957001 22.15%

2007 0.910874211 7.079579131 31.36% 202.24% 0.1714763 34.68% 1.547047997 53.65%

2008 0.59137454 0.752014917 36.70% 41.23% 0.2898425 11.95% 1.474466195 17.62%

40

Analysis

DuPont analysis of the company reveals that the effective tax rate for the company has been declining from around 30% to

merely 9% in 2007. However disregarding any special case the effective rate for the company is 20% in the current scenario.

Relative financing costs for the firm are on the declining trend although the firm has borrowed more in the recent years. This

shows that the company is successful on its operational aspect. OPM for the company also increased during the years from 21%

to 36%. Although NPM has been very fluctuating because of different tax reduction tactics.

A turnover ratio of the firm shows a deteriorating trend during the horizon. May be the company is building up capacity on rising

demands in the future but at this stage the results are not very impressive. NPM has been somewhat more stable, remaining on an

average in 10s.

The company has become more leveraged during the years due to the tax advantage of the debt and higher cost of raising capital

by equity in the current situation.

ROE has also been somewhat stable during the years except from CY05 to CY07 when the economic growth of the country was

impressive but wiped out after current economic and political turmoil.

41

Conclusion and Recommendations

After a thorough analysis of the financial statements of the said organization for last eight years it can be concluded the

organization has been performing quite well as far as the operating activity is concerned, firm’s financial managers and decision

makers also appear to be very efficient and well aware of the market environment. A phenomenal growth can be observed in the

firm’s ROE which further strengthens the investors’ faith in the organizations; however the area that seems to be lagging in the

organization after CY05 is the availability of fluent cash flows.

In order to make the cash flow of the firm better the managers must focus on the improvement of the cash cycle, they must

workout with their credit and procurement policies in order to compete with the industry. The managers of the firm should strive

to increase the figure of average payable days above the industry average and on the other hand they should also bring down the

average collection period.

Dawood Hercules is recently serving the fertilizer needs only in the provinces of NWFP and Punjab leaving behind the potential

market of Sind. A dealership of 3000 in numbers is on of the strength of the distribution channel of the organization; however it

should also try to establish an equivalent network in the southern region of the country so increase the market share. Also DH

should take advantage of the port city of Karachi for exporting its products across the globe; it can be made possible by setting up

a fertilizer plant in Sind. Plant in the Sheikhupura, near Lahore should be expanded in order to capture the market of Afghanistan

and Central Asian countries.

Future Outlook & Insight for Investors

Looking at the Stock holders’ equity side of the balance sheet where it is evident that the firm has issued further 9000 shares of

common stocks in CY08, also the decline in dividend payout ratio is indication towards the expansion and growth. In the view of

above mention scenario DH is an attractive organization for long term investments. Those who are willing to invest in the said

organization may receive valuable returns two to three years from now, furthermore by investing in fertilizer sector and specially

in DH, capital gain can also prove to be a valuable decision of investors in the years to come.

\

42

References

1. http://www.dawoodhercules.com.pk

2. http://www.ffc.com.pk/contents/annualrep.htm

3. http://www.google.com.pk

4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPS

5. http://www.kse.com.pk

6. http://www.sbp.org.pk/

7. http://www.brecorder.com/

43

Appendix

PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT (PKR)               

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2,008.00

Sales 2,850,669,632 2,809,921,239 2,983,374,808 2,699,135,306 3,290,547,342 3,881,749,695 5,011,002,249 7,428,702,879.00

Cost of Goods Sold 2,105,273,076 1,799,980,351 1,923,297,071 1,881,389,746 2,030,603,390 2,570,246,167 3,148,550,713 4,312,462,959.00

Gross Profit 745,396,556 1,009,940,888 1,060,077,737 817,745,560 1,259,943,952 1,311,503,528 1,862,451,536 3,116,239,920.00

Selling and Administrative Expenses 140,519,364 122,998,028 171,729,553 164,999,669 202,522,869 236,129,083 290,879,875 389,846,789.00

Operating Profit 604,877,192 886,942,860 888,348,184 652,745,891 1,057,421,083 1,075,374,445 1,571,571,661 2,726,393,131.00

Financial Charges   918,028 34,920,815 82,776,050 258,059,216 555,469,279 755,840,660 901,450,815.00

Realized gain on disposal of investment in associate 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,658,697,711

-

Other Income 283,132,290 309,854,058 892,429,605 563,638,222 1,775,777,364 1,047,260,406 395,240,918 509,591,425.00

Profit For The Year 888,009,482 1,195,878,890 1,745,856,974 1,133,608,063 2,575,139,231 1,567,165,572 9,869,669,630 2,334,533,741.00

Impairment on available for sale investments               100,310,990.00

Other Charges 65,329,982 64,580,067 60,056,494 39,888,420 56,501,043 70,508,258 74,370,791 183,934,447.00

Profit before Taxation 822,679,500 1,131,298,823 1,685,800,480 1,725,992,080 3,567,964,386 2,589,583,852 11,126,065,934 2,050,288,304.00

Provision for Taxation 228,000,000 338,000,000 307,000,000 223,600,000 332,600,000 535,377,058 991,619,410 837,800,000.00

Profit after Taxation 594,679,500 793,298,823 1,378,800,480 1,240,134,925 2,867,944,955 2,054,206,794 10,134,446,524 3,062,688,257.00

Earnings Per Share 12.38 11.01 19.13 17.21 39.80 24.79 122.3 28.00

44

BALANCE SHEET (PKR)2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

LIABILITIES

Authorized Capital

100,000,000 ordinary shares of Rs.10 each 1,000,000,000 1,000,000,000 1,000,000,000 1,000,000,000 1,000,000,000 1,000,000,000 1,000,000,000 10,000,000,000.00

Issued, subscribed and paid up capital 480,384,000 480,384,000 720,576,000 720,576,000 720,576,000 828,662,400 828,662,400 1,093,834,360.00

Capital reserve for plant BMR 200000000 200000000 200000000

Reserve for bonus shares 240,192,000 4,617,085,085 6,728,425,240

Revenue reserves 2,854,329,257 2,480,554,384 3,138,778,864 8,204,369,794 17,841,618,878 20,415,396,327.00

Fair value reserve on investments 1,088,826,650 2,306,135,392 2,496,420,510 1,906,238,414 240,111,684 219,050,827 (4,126,573,941.00)

3,534,713,257 4,489,957,034 6,365,490,256 7,834,081,595 9,355,239,654 9,273,143,878 18,889,332,105 17,382,656,746.00

Non Current Liabilities

Long Term Loans 6,500,000,000 6,302,500,000.00

Deferred taxation 14,800,000 (700,000) 1,600,000 44,200,000 46,800,000 172,200,000 207,200,000 327,700,000.00

Retirement and other service benefits 72,655,897 78,941,500 41,177,939 42,508,791 40,299,079 45,693,082 53,353,807 40,162,519.00

8,745,897 78,241,500 42,777,939 86,708,791 87,099,079 217,893,082 6,760,553,807 6,670,362,519.00

Short term financing - Secured 1,797,183,538 3,620,585,228 2,334,900,269 5,924,514,565 2,281,428,109 70,139,213.00

Creditors, accrued and other liabilities 445,713,608 520,379,618 748,438,646 549,855,308 631,691,242 490,446,012 512,953,299 538,132,695.00

Markup payable on secured loans 27,790,383 48,239,280 169,893,509 249,436,081 275,848,576.00

445,713,608 520,379,618 748,438,646 577,645,691 679,930,522 660,339,521 762,389,380 813,981,271.00

Provision for taxation 181,000,000 330,000,000 86,800,000 529,000,000 693,000,000.00

Proposed dividend 312,249,600 144,115,200

Total Current liabilities 757,963,208 520379618 2,689,737,384 4956876610 4024761313 6,671,654,086 3,572,817,489 1,577,120,484.00

Total Liabilities 845,419,105 598621118 2,732,515,323 4465939710 3431929870 6,889,547,168 10,333,371,296 8,247,483,003.00

4,380,132,362 5,088,578,152 9,098,005,579 12,300,021,305 12,787,169,524 16,162,691,046 29,222,703,401 25,630,139,749.00

45

ASSETS 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Fixed Assets                

At cost less accumulated depreciation 368381929 296,651,457 249,349,259 512,784,732 462,099,854 1,271,931,809 1,188,664,372        1,328,779,975.00 

Capital work in progress   555,008 160,133,674 17,662,690 228,199,667 75,442,444 185,364,261              67,553,966.00 

368381929 297,206,465 409,482,933 530,447,422 690,299,521 1,347,374,253 1,374,028,633        1,396,333,941.00 

               

Long Term Investments 18868700000 2,487,009,754 2,758,000,595 2,000,956,610 5,732,602,699 6,292,386,865 16,610,255,523     19,205,628,008.00 

Long Term Loans and Advances 665085 798,375 954,885 11,679,210 643,810 12,799,615 1,113,125  

deferred taxation   700,000                          1,259,750.00 

Deferred Costs 31219029 36,834,254 54,075,833          

Current Assets                

Stores, spares and loose tools 498401954 534,400,630 650,455,635 564,908,581 646,509,899 759,952,372 893,254,067        1,025,764,636.00 

Stocks 132262395 121,636,535 103,639,755 68,179,489 164,432,448 237,295,434 867,510,588              89,568,216.00 

Trade debtors 7569876 7,048,731 5,489,077 9,337,536 3,850,344 2,502,849 4,742,483                8,821,267.00 

Loans, advances, prepayments and other rec. 132958546 53,310,851 301,376,936 583,066,928 402,983,667 298,706,918 491,751,391              72,251,421.00 

Advance income tax     3,428,734,001 7,458,890,850 4,746,928,000               663,149,343.00 

Short term investments   1,550,332,557 1,385,795,929 1,072,554,679 398,919,136 7,155,378,175 7,882,223,476        2,233,424,979.00 

Cash and bank balances 1339973548 2,266,729,304 5,875,491,333 9,756,938,063 6,363,623,494 56,294,565 1,097,824,115           933,938,188.00 

Total Current Assets 2111166319 4533458608 11750982666 19513876126 12727246988 8510130313 11237306120        5,026,918,050.00 

Total Assets 4,380,132,362 5,088,578,152 9,098,005,579 12,300,021,305 12,787,169,524 16,162,691,046 29,222,703,401 25,630,139,749.00

46