david r. myers april 11, 2007 ee 235 ultimate strength in germanium nanowires

14
David R. Myers April 11, 2007 EE 235 Ultimate Strength in Germanium Nanowires

Upload: hubert-miller

Post on 02-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: David R. Myers April 11, 2007 EE 235 Ultimate Strength in Germanium Nanowires

David R. Myers

April 11, 2007

EE 235

Ultimate Strength in Germanium Nanowires

Page 2: David R. Myers April 11, 2007 EE 235 Ultimate Strength in Germanium Nanowires

Motivation• In General

– Properties of thin films, nanowires are often different than bulk materials

– Need to characterize these properties to be able to design micro and nano systems

– Mechanical Strength for electromechanical device construction

• Nano-Specific– Can we get stronger materials?

Page 3: David R. Myers April 11, 2007 EE 235 Ultimate Strength in Germanium Nanowires

Stress Intensity• Cracks cause local stress increases depending on

loading condition

Type1 Type2 Type3

1/ 2 3/ 20.43 1.9IK Pd Md 1/ 2 3/ 20.56 1.5IIK Pd Md

Type I Type II Type III

Thougless, et. al,1 found that for brittle plates, the stress intensity factors are:

Page 4: David R. Myers April 11, 2007 EE 235 Ultimate Strength in Germanium Nanowires

Material Testing So Far…

• Before Study– Near Theoretical Strengths for composite

whiskers have been reported– Cracks & Imperfections typically cause deviation

from ultimate strength– Only about 50% theoretical strength for silicon

has been reported

• Germanium– High Mobility– Inferior Oxide– Wafers are brittle

Page 5: David R. Myers April 11, 2007 EE 235 Ultimate Strength in Germanium Nanowires

Supercritical Fluid-Liquid-Solid Apparatus

• Monodisperse Gold nanocrystals as catalysts

• Hexane with tetraethylgermane and diphenylgermane (silicon precursor) at 365C, 5.5x104 mbar

• Very high throughput & 90% in <112> direction

Batch Reactor

Porous Alumina with Gold Nanocrystals

Page 6: David R. Myers April 11, 2007 EE 235 Ultimate Strength in Germanium Nanowires

Supercritical Fluid-Liquid-Solid Mechanism

• Coexistance of Au:Ge Liquid and Germanium Solid at 360C, 28% Ge conc.

• Germanium most likely to dissolve into gold particle, until super-saturation, in which it will be expelled as nanowire

Page 7: David R. Myers April 11, 2007 EE 235 Ultimate Strength in Germanium Nanowires

Device Testing Method

Sonicate IPA

Drop onto Trench

Pin with Platinum

Page 8: David R. Myers April 11, 2007 EE 235 Ultimate Strength in Germanium Nanowires

Testing Method

Page 9: David R. Myers April 11, 2007 EE 235 Ultimate Strength in Germanium Nanowires

Results & Comparison

Material Ultimate Strength

Bulk Silicon ~300 MPa - 1 GPa

Mild Steel ~450 MPa

Hard Steel ~1.3 GPa

Aluminum ~260 MPa

Ge Nanowire

~15 GPa

• Note Lack of Ductile Behavior Failure– Shows AFM application of force does not give rise to

defects– The ultimate theoretical strength of Ge is shown

Page 10: David R. Myers April 11, 2007 EE 235 Ultimate Strength in Germanium Nanowires

Results for Various Radii

• Interesting to note max theoretical strength is 17GPa, but data gives 15 +/- 4 GPa

• Also Displacement at failure is a function of radius

Page 11: David R. Myers April 11, 2007 EE 235 Ultimate Strength in Germanium Nanowires

Questions?

• Thanks!

Page 12: David R. Myers April 11, 2007 EE 235 Ultimate Strength in Germanium Nanowires

Ductile Failure

Page 13: David R. Myers April 11, 2007 EE 235 Ultimate Strength in Germanium Nanowires

Thin Film Application

• These Stress Intensity Factors (previous equations) have been derived for films on brittle materials2

0

1 0.279 ( 1)0.434IK

h I

0

1 0.217 ( 1)0.558IIK

h I

f

s

E

E

h

z

z

h I = Moment of Inertia

Note: Normally the stress intensity factor are determined by loading conditions. In this special case, the stress intensity factor is determined solely by the geometry.

Page 14: David R. Myers April 11, 2007 EE 235 Ultimate Strength in Germanium Nanowires

Type II Stress Concentration• Type II Stress concentration determines direction of

crack propagation

KII < 0 KII = 0 KII > 0

Into substrate

Crack growth aimed away from surface

Crack growth aimed towards the surface

Crack growth parallel to surface

• Results from Drory2