david normansell. overview intro to the big five history & development dimensions examples...
TRANSCRIPT
Intro to the Big Five History & Development Dimensions Examples of Tests Psychometric Properties Personality Studies
• Job Performance• Counterproductive Behaviors• Leadership
Personality• Enduring characteristics of a particular
individual
The “Big Five” • Broad dimensions used to categorize and
describe personality.• Each dimension consists of a range of more
specific traits. Synonymous: Five-Factor Model (FFM)
• Developed by Costa & McCrae (1988)
The study of personality is derived from the Lexical hypothesis.
• Important human personality dimensions will be represented in every language.
• The more important the attribute, the more synonyms it will acquire. E.g., for dominance: bossy, assertive,
powerful, pushy, forceful, domineering, etc.
Allport and Odbert:• Often credited as being the first to use the lexical approach to
define personality. • Went through an English-language dictionary - obtained 17000
traits which were then reduced to about 4500 words that described specific personality traits.
Cattell:• Reduced 4,000 terms to about 171 clusters by a rating scheme.• Used factor analysis to identify “bipolar pairs” of traits that
were closely related to one another• Eventually reduced his list to 16 key personality factors.
Eysenck:• Three dimensions
Introversion-extroversion Neuroticism-emotional Psychoticism
Tupes & Christal• Air Force Researchers• Factor analysis using Cattell’s traits and suggested that
only 5 traits were predominant
Goldberg• Replicated Cattell’s methods• 5 factors:
Surgency, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, Culture
Costa & McCrae• Somewhat intuitively consolidated traits
• Factor Analysis
• Discovered Extroversion, Neuroticism, and Openness.
• Added Agreeableness and Conscientiousness to fit with the 5 factors of Goldberg
High Pole• Active• Assertive• Seek Stimulation• Outgoing• Talkative• Energetic
Low Pole• Reserved• Quiet• Shy• Unexpressive
High Pole• Artistic• Curious • Imaginative• Insightful• Original• Cultured
Low Pole• Traditional• Simple• Routine
NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI)• (Costa & McCrey , 1988)
NEI-PI-R – (Costa & McCrea, 1992)• Revised NEO personality inventory
Big Five Inventory (BFI)• (John & Srivastava, 1999)
Trait Descriptive Adjectives TDI • (Goldberg, 1992)
John and Srivastava (1991):• Looked at the validity and reliability of three
commonly used instruments:
NEO-FFI TDA BFI
Robins, et al. (2001) A longitudinal study of personality change in young adulthood.• College Students• NEO-FFI
Agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness increased.
Extroversion: no change Neuroticism: decreased
• Problems with the study?
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991)
• Conscientiousness: consistent relation with all job performance criteria (i.e., turnover or tenure) and occupational group (i.e., police)
• Extroversion: predicted success in management and sales
• Openness and extroversion predicted training proficiency
• Agreeableness and Neuroticism: some evidence to suggest that they contribute to performance in group settings.
Salgado, J. F. (2002) conducted a meta-analysis of studies investigating the relationship of the big five to counterproductive work behaviors
Results• Conscientiousness: predicted deviant behaviors
and turnover • Emotional Stability (N) and Conscientiousness
were the strongest predictors of turnover
Judge et al. (2002) studied the relationship between the Big 5 leadership emergence and leadership success
• Extroversion and Conscientiousness predicted leader emergence
Judge & Bono (2000): Transformational Leadership• TL is the ability to inspire followers with a vision beyond
their own self interest. Idealized influence Charisma Inspirational motivation Articulation of vision
• Agreeableness, extroversion, and openness all correlated with Transformational Leadership.