david iriogbe junior - gbm

7/27/2019 David Iriogbe Junior - GBM

1/15

1

ContentsIntroduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2

Definition of Management............................................................................................................................ 2

Management Objectives, Functions, Goals, and importance ....................................................................... 3

Goals of All Managers ................................................................................................................................... 4

The: importance of Management in Any Organization ................................................................................ 5

Managerial Skills and the corporation Hierarchy ......................................................................................... 6

Women within the corporation Hierarchy.................................................................................................... 6

Study of Management Theory ...................................................................................................................... 7

Management Theories .................................................................................................................................. 8

Scientific Management school ...................................................................................................................... 8

Classical organizational Theory school ......................................................................................................... 9

Behavioral college ....................................................................................................................................... 10

Recent Developments in Management Theory .......................................................................................... 11

Other Management Theories ..................................................................................................................... 12

Management as observe ............................................................................................................................ 13

Conclusions ................................................................................................................................................. 14

References .................................................................................................................................................. 15


2/15

2

Introduction

Managing is one in all of the foremost vital human activities. From the time that people began forming

social organizations to accomplish aims and objectives they were not able to not accomplish as people,

managing has been essential to confirm the coordination of individual efforts. As society endlessly reliedon team effort, and as several organized teams became bigger and bigger, the task of managers has

been increasing in importance and elaboration. Henceforth, managerial theory has become crucial

within the ways that managers manage advanced organizations.

The central idea of this paper is that though some managers in several elements of this globalized planet

might have achieved managerial success while not having basic theoretical information and knowledge

in management, it's to be unambiguously emphasized that those managers that have mixed

management theory in their everyday follow, have had higher possibilities of managing their

organizations a lot more efficiently and effectively to attain each individual and structure objectives.

Therefore, managers of currently running organizations need to appreciate the vital role they play intheir various organizations if they're to attain the set goals. Secondly, there's a need of promoting

promote excellence among all persons in organizations, particularly among managers themselves. to

deal with these issues, the paper will proceed on the subsequent spectrum: management is outlined for

functions of conceptual clarity; management objectives, functions, goals, and importance, are

highlighted; the importance of organizational skills and also the structure hierarchy is going to be

sketched; the importance of females working within the organizational hierarchy is going to be

emphasized; reasons for finding out management theory are enumerated; the various management

theories, the core of the paper, are mentioned at length; the importance of management as a rehearsal

are contextualized; and the method forward in style of a conclusion will be offered.

Definition of Management

Management is that the art, or science, of achieving goals through individuals. Since managers do also

supervise, management may be understood to mean virtually looking over i.e., ensuring individuals

do what they're needed to do. Managers are, therefore, expected to make sure larger productivity or,

applying the present jargon, continuous improvement. More generally, management is that the

method of planning and maintaining an atmosphere during which people, operating along in teams,

expeditiously accomplish designated aims (Koontz and Weihrich, 1990). In its dilated type, this basic

definition means many things. First, as managers, individuals do the managerial functions of planning,

organizing, staffing, leading, and controlling. Second, management applies to any type of organization.

Third, management applies to managers in any cluster of organizational levels. Fourth, the aim of all

managers goes the same to make surplus. Finally, managing is attached with productivity this means

effectiveness and efficiency. Thus, management refers to the expansion of hierarchical levels that

derives its importance from the requirement for strategic designing, co-ordination, leading and

controlling of huge and sophisticated decision-making method. Primarily, therefore, management


3/15


4/15


5/15

5

non-business enterprise like units of a business (such as an accounting department) that don't seem to

be answerable for total business profits, managers still have goals and will try to accomplish them with

the minimum of resources or to accomplish as much as attainable with accessible resources. A manager

whom achieves such an aim is alleged to be a strategic manager.

The second goal or aim of all managers is that they have to be productive. Indeed, government, andtherefore the non-public sector acknowledge the imperative demand for productivity improvement.

Productivity improvement is concerning effectively executing of the managerial and non-managerial

activities. Merely outlined, productivity is concerning the output-input quantitative relation inside a

period of time with due thought for equality.

Lastly, productivity implies effectiveness and potency in individual and structure performance.

Effectiveness is that the accomplishment of objectives. Potency is the accomplishment of the ends with

the smallest {amount} amount of resources. Managers cannot apprehend whether or not they are

productive unless they initially apprehend their goals and people of the organization.

The: importance of Management in Any Organization

Managers are charged with the responsibility of taking actions that may make it doable for people to

form their best contributions to team objectives. Thus, management applies to tiny and enormous

organizations, to profit and not for-profit enterprises, to producing also as service industries. However, a

given scenario might disagree significantly among varied levels in a corporation or varied kinds of

enterprises. The scope of authority control might vary and therefore the kinds of issues addressed are

also significantly different. All managers get results by establishing an atmosphere for effective team

endeavor. Additionally, all managers perform social control functions. However, the time spent for every

process might dissent. Thus, superior managers waste more time on planning and organizing than do

lower-level managers. Leading, on the opposite hand, takes a big amount and deal of your time for first-

line supervisors. The distinction within the quantity of your time spent on controlling varies solely

slightly for managers at different levels.

The manager is, therefore, the dynamic, vitalizing part in each business. Discarding the leadership of the

manager, resources of production stay mere resources and will never become production. In a very

competitive economy, the standards and performance of the managers verify the success of a business;

so, they are able to evaluate its survival ability. Furthermore, today, we tend to no longer speak of

capital and labor, however we tend to speak of management and labor. Whereas theresponsibilities of capital and therefore the rights of capital have disappeared from our vocabulary,

these days we tend to hear of the responsibilities of management or prerogatives of management.

Thus, the emergence of management as a necessity, a definite and a number one establishment may be

a crucial event in social history. Management is probably going to stay a basic and dominant

establishment as long as human civilization itself survives. Management, that is that the organ of society

specifically charged with creating resources productive, that is, with the responsibility for organized


6/15

6

economic advance, reflects the essential spirit of the fashionable age. In fact, as a result of management

is indispensable, this explains why it grew therefore quick and with so very little opposition. Hence, the

developed and developing worlds have a huge stake within the competency, talent and responsibility of

management.

Managerial Skills and the corporation Hierarchy

Mangers need four main forms of skills, namely: conceptual, human, technical and design. What do

every of those talents mean? Technical skill is information of and proficiency in activities involving

strategies, processes, and procedures. Thus, it involves operating with tools and specific techniques.

Human talent is that the ability to figure with individuals; its cooperative effort; its teamwork; it's the

creation of an atmosphere within which people feel secure and liberated to state their opinions.

Conceptual talent is that the ability to serve the big picture. Its additionally focusing on recognizing

important components during a scenario, and to grasp the relationships among the organization

elements. Design talent is that the ability to unravel issues in ways in which can profit the enterprise. To

be effective, significantly at higher corporation levels, managers should be able to do more than see a

tangle. Additionally, they have to have the talent of a decent style engineer in understanding a sensible

resolution to a tangle or issue.

Managers should even have that valuable talent of having the ability to produce a possible resolution to

the matter within the light of the realities they face. It has; however, have to be compelled to be

mentioned that the relative importance of those skills might disagree at varied levels within the

organization hierarchy. For functions of elaboration, technical skills are of greatest importance at the

superordinate level and fewer at the middle-management level, human skills within the frequent

interactions with subordinates in the slightest degree levels, conceptual skills not important for lower-

level supervisors however gain in importance at the middle-management level. At the highest

management level, abstract and style skills and human skills square measure particularly valuable,

however there's comparatively no use for technical skills. The idea, particularly in massive firms, that

chief executives will utilize the technical skills of their subordinates. In smaller corporations, however,

technical expertise should still be quite necessary.

Women within the corporation Hierarchy

In recent times, ladies have created important progress in getting accountable positions in

organizations. Among the explanations for this development are laws governing honest employment

practices, ever-changing social group attitudes toward ladies within the workplace, and therefore the

want of firms to project a positive image by inserting qualified ladies in managerial positions. However,


7/15


8/15

8

structure, there are many principles that are interconnected which have a prophetical price for

managers.

In sum, there are essentially a triple set of main reasons why we must review management theory. First,

theories give a stable focus for understanding what we are experiencing. A theory provides criteria for

what's relevant. Second, theories make us to speak with efficiency and so go in a lot of complicatedrelationships with people. Third, theories enable us to make it attainable so, challenge us to keep on

learning regarding our world. By definition, theories have boundaries.

Management TheoriesContemporary theories of management tend to account for and facilitate interpret the speedily ever-

changing nature of todays corporation environments. This paper will analyze many vital management

theories that are generally classified as follows: The Scientific Management college comprising the

works of Frederick W.Taylor and Lillian Gilbreths scrutiny, among others; the Classical structure Theory

college comprising the works of Henri Fayols views on administration, and max Webers idealizedpaperwork, among others; Behavioral college comprising the work of Elton dressing and his associates;

the Management Science school that is discussed at the top of this section; and up to date

Developments in Management Theory comprising works like Systems Approach, Situational or

Contingency theory, Chaos theory, and Team Building approach. For lack of your time and space, this

discussion can give a general description of a number of the scholars in every of those management

theories and therefore the successes that they achieved.

Scientific Management school

The first management theory is what's popularly cited as Frederick Taylors Scientific Management.

Frederick Taylor started the age of contemporary management. Within the late nineteenth and early

twentieth centuries, he was decrying the awkward, inefficient, or ill-directed movements of men as

national loss. Taylor systematically wanted to overthrow management by rule of thumb and replace it

with actual regular observations resulting in the one best practice method. He conjointly advocated

the systematic coaching of employees in the one best practice instead of permitting them personal

discretion in their tasks. He also believed that the work would be equally shared between the employees

and management with management school the science and instruction and therefore the employees

playacting the labor, every team doing the work that was best suited.

Taylors strongest positive and well known theory was the conception of breaking complicated task

down into variety of subtasks, and optimizing the performance of the subtasks; therefore, his stop-

watch measured time trials. However, several critics, each historical and modern, have noticed that

Taylors theories tend to dehumanize the employees. Nevertheless, Taylors postulations were

powerfully influenced by his social/historical time (1856-1917) throughout the economic Revolution; it

absolutely was an amount of autocratic management that saw Taylor turning to science (hence, his


9/15

9

principles of scientific management) as an answer to the inefficiencies and injustices of this time. Its to

be declared that scientific management met with vital success among those mentioned included: the

science of cutting metal, hand shovel style that he created at Bethlehem Steel Works, employee

incentive schemes, a rate system for market and retail management, and corporation influences within

the development of the fields of manufacturing engineering, personnel, and quality management and

control.

It has to be acknowledged that from an economic position, Taylorism was an extreme success.

Application of his strategies yielded vital enhancements in productivity. For instance, enhancements like

his shovel work on Bethlehem Works, that reduced the employees required to shovel from five hundred

to one hundred forty. Henceforth, Taylor planned four of the best underlying principles of management.

First, there's have to be compelled to develop a science of labor to interchange recent rule-of-thumb

methods: pay and different rewards connected for the accomplishment of optimum goals measures

of work performance and output; failure to achieve these would in distinction lead to loss of earnings.

Second, employees to be scientifically hand-picked and developed: coaching each one to be first-classat some specific task. Three, the science of work to be brought alongside scientifically selected workers

and trained individuals to attain the most effective results. Finally, work and responsibility to be divided

equally between employees and management cooperating along in close interdependency and

mutuality.

Alongside Taylors postulates is Gilbreths time-and-motion study. The optimized and final results of this

study led to the position and the place of potency in organizations. Gilbreth was notably curious about

the method which with he might scale back the unessential motions ensuing from bricklaying at a

construction site; he succeeded in reducing the motions from eighteen to four. He then planned thatevery employee ought to be concerned in doing his or her own work, brace oneself for the subsequent

higher level, and coaching their successors.

Classical organizational Theory school

In this class of management theory are the works of max Webers functionary theory and Henri Fayols

administrative theory. Weber postulated that culture was shifting from wertrational (or price

oriented) thinking, emotional action (action derived from emotions), and ancient action (action derived

from past precedent) to zweckational (or technocratic) thinking. He believed that civilization was ever-

changing to achieve technically best results at the expense of emotional or humanistic content. Weber

then developed a collection of principles for an ideal bureaucracy as follows: mounted and official

territorial areas, a firmly ordered hierarchy of super and subordination, management supported written

records, thorough and knowledgeable coaching, and official activity taking priority over different

activities which management of a given organization follows stable, cognoscible rules. The bureaucracy


10/15

10

was unreal as an oversized machine for attaining its goals within the most effective manner potential.

However, Weber was cautious of bureaucracy once he discovered that a lot of totally complete, a lot of

paperwork depersonalizes itself i.e., a lot of utterly it succeeds in achieving the exclusion of

affection, hatred, and each strictly personal, particularly irrational and undeterminable, feeling fromexecution of official tasks. Hence, Weber foretold a totally impersonal organization with very little

human level interaction between its members.

Henri Fayols body theory in the main focuses on the private duties of management at a way a lot of

granular level. In different words, his work is a lot of directed at the management layer. Fayol believed

that management had 5 principle roles: to forecast and arrange, to arrange, to command, to co-

ordinate, and to manage. Foretelling and coming up with was the act of anticipating the longer term and

acting consequently. Organization was the event of the institutions resources, each material and

human. Commanding was keeping the institutions actions and processes running. Co-ordination was

the alignment and harmonization of the groups efforts. Finally, management meant that the higher

than activities were performed in accordance with acceptable rules and procedures.

Fayol developed fourteen principles of administration to travel beside managements 5 primary roles.

These principles are: specialization/division of labor, authority with responsibility, discipline, unity of

command, unity of direction, subordination of individual interest to the overall interest, remuneration

of employees, centralization, scalar chain/line of authority, order, and equity, stability of tenure,

initiative, and esprit de corps. Fayol clearly believed personal effort and team dynamics were a part of

an ideal organization. Fayols 5 principle roles (Plan, Organize, Command, Co-ordinate, and Control) of

management are still actively practiced these days. The construct of giving acceptable authority with

responsibility is additionally wide commented on and is well practiced. Sadly, his principles of unity ofcommand and unity of direction are systematically desecrated in matrix management, the

structure of alternative for several of todays corporations.

Behavioral college

The key scholar below this class is Elton mayo. The origin of behaviorism is

the human relations movement that was a results of the Hawthorne Works Experiment disbursed at the

Western light company, within the USA that started within the early Twenties (1927-32). Eltonmayonnaise and his associates experiments disproved Taylors beliefs that science set that the best

productivity was found in the one best means which way might be obtained by controlled experiment.

The Nathaniel Hawthorne studies tried to see the results of lighting on employee productivity. Once

these experiments showed no clear correlation between lightweight level and productivity the

experiments then started staring at different factors.


11/15

11

Recent Developments in Management Theory

Under this class of theory are the Systems Approach, Situational or Contingency theory, Chaos theory,

and Team Building theory. The systems theory has had a big result on management science and

understanding organizations. A system could be an assortment of half unified to accomplish an overallgoal. If one a part of the system is removed, the characteristics of the system are modified too. A system

is checked out as having inputs (e.g., resources like raw materials, money, technologies, and people),

processes (e.g., planning, organizing, motivating, and dominant), outputs (products or services) and

outcomes (e.g., increased quality of life or productivity for customers/clients, productivity). Systems

share feedback among every of those four aspects of the system.

The Systems Theory could appear quite basic. Yet, decades of management coaching and practices

within the workplace haven't followed this theory. Just recently, with tremendous changes facing

organizations and the way they operate, have educators and managers come back to face this new

means of viewing things. The result of systems theory in management is that it helps managers toappear at the organization a lot of generally. Its additionally enabled managers to interpret patterns

and events within the workplace i.e., by enabling managers to acknowledge the varied components of

the organization, and, particularly, the interrelations of the components.

The situational or contingency theory asserts that once managers create a choice, they need to take

under consideration of all aspects of the present scenario and act on those aspects that are keys to the

case at hand. Basically, it will be the approach that it depends. As an example, if one is leading troops

in Middle East, an autocratic vogue is perhaps best. If one is leading a hospital or University, a lot of

participative and helpful leadership vogue is maybe best.

The Chaos theory is advocated by Tom Peters (1942). As chaotic and random as world events appear

nowadays, they're equally chaotic in organizations. Nonetheless for several decades, managers have

acted on the premise that corporation events will continuously be controlled. Thus, a brand new theory,

called chaos theory, has emerged to acknowledge that events are seldom controlled. Chaos theorists

recommend that systems naturally move to a lot of elaboration, and as they are occurring, they become

a lot more volatile and should, therefore, expend a lot of energy to take care of that elaboration. As they

expend a lot of energy, they look for additional structure to keep up the stability. This trend continues

till the system splits, combines with another advanced system or falls apart entirely. The last

management theory is that the Team Building approach or theory. This theory emphasizes quality

circles, best practices, and continuous improvement. Its a theory that chiefly hinges on reliance on

cooperation. It additionally emphasizes flattening of management pyramid, and reducing the clusters of

hierarchy. Finally, it's all concerning the management i.e., involving a lot of individuals in the least

levels in decision-making.


12/15

12

Other Management Theories

In this category are the works of Edward W. Deming and pol McGregor. Edward Deming is the founding

father of new quality management and is regarded by scholars and also organizations in Japan because

of his key influence in their economic miracle after the Second World War. He postulated manyassumptions: produce constancy of purpose for continual improvement of merchandise and service;

adopt the new philosophy created in Japan; stop dependence on mass inspection; build quality together

with price; improve perpetually and forever each method coming up with, production, and service;

institute trendy ways of coaching on-the-job for as well as management; adopt and institute leadership

geared toward serving to individuals to try to an improved job; drive out concern, encourage effective

two-way communication; breakdown barriers between departments and workers areas; eliminate

exhortations for the force they solely produce adversarial relationships; eliminate quotas and

numerical targets; take away barriers to pride of skill, as well as annual appraisals and Management by

Objectives; encourage education and self-reformation for everyone; and outline high managements

permanent commitment to ever up quality and productivity and their obligation to implement of these

principles.

Douglas McGregor (1906-1964) postulated management ideas as contained in Theory X and Theory

Y. Exploitation human behavior analysis, he noted that the means a company runs depends on the

beliefs of its managers. Theory X provides a negative understanding of human behavior and

management that he thought-about to possess dominated management theory from Fayol ahead

particularly Taylorism. It additionally assumes that almost all individuals are primarily immature, would

like direction and management, and are incapable of taking responsibility. They viewed as lazy, dislike

work and wish a combination of monetary inducements and threat of loss of their job to create them

work (carrot and stick mentality).

Theory Y, the alternative of Theory X, argues that individuals wish to satisfy themselves by seeking

self-esteem, self-development, and fulfillment at work as in life normally. The six basic assumptions for

Theory Y are: work is as natural as play or rest the common individual doesn't inherently dislike work,

whether or not work could be a supply of delight or a penalization (to be avoided) depends on nature of

the work and its management. Second, effort at work doesnt depend upon threat of penalization if

committed to objectives then independency and self-control instead of external controls. Third,

commitment to objectives could be a performance of the rewards related to their action.

Satisfaction of ego and self-actualization wants is directed towards the objectives of the organization.

Fourth, the common individual learns, underneath correct conditions, not solely to just accept however

to hunt responsibility. Fifth, high degrees of imagination, ingenuity and creative thinking don't seem to

be restricted to a slender group however are widely distributed within the population. Lastly,

underneath the conditions of recent industrial life, the intellectual potentials of the common individual

are being just partially used.


13/15


14/15


15/15

15

References

Barclay, M.J., Holderness, C.G., 1989. Private benefits from control of public corporations.Journal of Financial Economics.

Berle, A., Means, G., 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Harcourt, Brace, & World,New York, NY.

Cronqvist, H., Nilsson, M., 2003. Agency costs of controlling minority shareholders. Journal ofFinancial and Quantitative Analysis.

Fleet David D. Van and Peterson Tim O., 1994. Contemporary Management (Houghton Mifflin

Company), Third Edition.

Gompers, P. Ishii, J., Metrick, A., 2003. Corporate governance and equity prices. QuarterlyJournal of Economics.

Himmelberg, P., Hubbard, R.G., Palia, D., 1999. Understanding the determinants of managerialownership and the link between ownership and performance. Journal of Financial Economics.

Koontz Harold, 1961. The Management Theory Jungle, in Journal of the Academy of Management,

December.

Koontz Harold, 1962. Making Sense of Management Theory, in Harvard Business Review, July-August.

Koontz Harold, 1980. The Management Theory Revisited, in Academy of Management Review, April.

Koontz Harold and Weihrich Heinz, 1990. Essentials of Management, Fifth Edition, McGraw-Hill.

La Porta, R., Lpez De Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., 1999. Corporate ownership around the world.Journal of Finance.

Morck, R. K., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R., 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: Anempirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics.

Palia, D., Ravid, S.A., 2002. The role of founders in large companies: Entrenchment or valuable humancapital? Unpublished working paper. Rutgers University.

Stoner James A. F., Freeman R. Edward, and Gilbert, Jr. Daniel R., 2003. Management (New Delhi:

Prentice-Hall of India), Sixth Edition.

Zingales, L., 1995. What determines the value of corporate votes? Quarterly Journal of

Economics.

david iriogbe junior - gbm

Documents