david e. elkowitz, d.o. director of undergraduate medical education, course director
DESCRIPTION
P atient-Centered E xplorations in A ctive R easoning, L earning and S ynthesis. David E. Elkowitz, D.O. Director of Undergraduate Medical Education, Course Director Assistant Professor Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Science Education - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
David E. Elkowitz, D.O.Director of Undergraduate Medical Education,
Course Director Assistant Professor
Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Science Education Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine
Patient-Centered Explorations in Active Reasoning, Learning and Synthesis
About our School of Medicine
• Located on Hofstra University’s Campus, Hempstead, NY• First allopathic medical school in New York since 1963• Housed in new, state-of-the-art, 48,000 square foot,
Medical Education Center • Offer MD, MD/PhD, and PhD degrees
About North Shore-LIJ• Nation’s second largest, non-profit, secular health system • Nation’s 16th largest, integrated healthcare network, and
the largest in New York State• Services 7 million people at 16 hospitals on Long Island
and in Manhattan, Queens, and Staten Island• 2010 National Quality Forum award winner – National
Quality Healthcare Award
The School of Medicine, in a culture of community, scholarship, and
innovation, is dedicated to inspiring diverse and promising students to
lead and transform medicine for the betterment of humanity.
Mission Statement
Values Diversity
Professionalism
Patient Centered
Reflection
Vision
Community
Scholarship
Innovation
Learning
Humanism
SOM Competencies
GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT
“Adult learner” environment
Integration of health, disease and intervention
Fully integrated, science and clinical curriculum
Early meaningful patient interactions
Focus on learning, not teaching
Built on experiential/ small group learning
Assessment drives learning
Emphasis on scholarship, critical thinking, lifelong learning
True to mission, values, drivers
Curricular Structure: Spiral Curriculum
Content revisited at multiple points in time; increased difficulty, greater depth, consideration of current context
Curriculum Overview: 1st 100 Weeks
Typical Week
Integration • Science to science• Science to clinical• Science to pedagogy• Departments
How Will Students Learn?
Summarize, interpret
Name, define
Organize, solve
Examine, contrast
Defend, appraise
Develop, predict
“FLOW” EXPERIENCESIN RELATION TO CHALLENGES AND SKILLS
Control
Chal
leng
es
Low
HighLow
High
Knowledge & Skills
FLOW
ArousalAnxiety
Worry
Apathy
BoredomRelaxation
Pedagogies
PEARLS
Small groups with a process expert (student-
generated content)
Socratic Style
Small groups with a content and process
expert
Large Group
Large groups with a content expert (director-
generated content)
Guiding Principles
PEARLS as the Cornerstone
PEARLS- Patient-centered Explorations in Active Reasoning, Learning & Synthesis
Major way that students address most basic science content
Problem-Based Learning/Case Based Learning Hybrid
Student-driven, facilitators there to guide process only (not content)
Cornerstone for all other weekly session (including Structure)
Bas
ic S
cien
ces
Stru
ctur
al S
cien
ces
Pro
fess
iona
l Ski
lls
PEARLS
Content
Educational Philosophy• Value learning over teaching• Trust the students to learn much of the factual knowledge
outside of class• Active learners every day• Critical thinking, Problem solving & Knowledge in Action-
science that sticks• Societal forces of the times
– Decision making under uncertainty– Deliver effective and safe care– Majority of care delivered outpatient setting– Health care teams caring for patients
PEARLS: Patient-Centered Explorations in Active Reasoning,
Learning and Synthesis
• Hybrid problem-based/case-based learning pedagogy
• Students synthesize biomedical science in the context of patient-centered clinical cases with peers
• PEARLS relies heavily upon formative assessments to
help achieve goals of competency based component of program
Pillars Provide Structure to Achieve Goals Of PEARLS Program
PEARLS Pillars• PBL/CBL Pedagogy• Group Dynamics• Higher Order Thinking
Goals of PEARLS• Leadership, PBL&I• Teamwork• Acquiring knowledge of
biomedical sciences, Critical thinking
THE PILLARS AND GOALS INFORM ALL ASPECTS OF PEARLS
• Monday• Roles: leader, timekeeper, recorder• Patient-centered cases• Explore issues and Actively Reason through cases to
develop learning objectives • Mon-Wed Self Directed Learning• Wednesday- Synthesize and apply information with
peers in group• Wed-Fri/Friday repeat for second case• Weekend-complete end of week essay
PEARLS in Action
• Mondays– Cases strongly lead to LO’s– Role of faculty member is minimal; quiet
• Wednesdays/Fridays– Higher order discussions– Faculty can facilitate this using PQ’s or questions to probe
critical thinking:• What exactly is your question?• Could you elaborate further?• How could we verify if that is true?• Can you sketch that for us?• What factors make this a difficult problem?
Reflection, Integration & Assessment
Reflection, Integration & Assessment Weeks
Monday Check-in
• Self assessment• Reflection
PEARLS Formative Self & Group Assessments Lead to Skills in PBL&I and SBP
Monday AM Wed AM Friday AM
Mon/Wed/Fri Wrap-up
• Self & group assessment• Content & process• Facilitator framed component• Reflection
PEARLS Formative Self & Group Assessments Lead to Skills in PBL&I and SBP
Monday AM Wed AM Friday AM
Multiple Perspectives
Case
Society
Patient
Biologic Science
PopulationHealth
Prevention
Therapy
Patient-Centered Cases: Created by Integrated Design Teams to Expand the Perspective for Learning
Course/Case Development Interdisciplinary team
1. Establish learning
objectives
2. Align weekly sessions with
vertical content
3. Assign LOs & design weekly
sessions
4. Determine required resources
5. Finalize assessment
scheme, faculty development
Evolution of Complexity of Cases
• Will cases change in any way over time?• Spend fist 10 minutes generating DDx• Add incorrect information to a case or mismatch
– Case states patient has 1st degree heart block but actual EKG has 2nd degree heart block
• Leave off goals of cases ?
Pillars Provide Structure to Achieve Goals Of PEARLS Program
PEARLS Pillars• PBL/CBL Pedagogy• Group Dynamics• Higher Order Thinking
Goals of PEARLS• Leadership, PBL&I• Teamwork• Acquiring knowledge of
biomedical sciences, Critical thinking
THE PILLARS AND GOALS INFORM ALL ASPECTS OF PEARLS
PEARLS Development
Faculty• Philosophy• Programmatic rules• Journal clubs• Tape review• Simulations• Observation/debrief• Facilitator meetings • PEARLS GO! sessions
Student• Philosophy • Programmatic rules • Student leadership roles• Wrap up questions/
assessment • PEARLS GO! Sessions• Outside sessions
6 STEPS TO SUCCESS AS A PEARLS FACILITATOR
As a facilitator, your role is to promote student development of PEARLS course expectations by: Knowing the PEARLS expectations for the course in which you are facilitating.
Having a solid understanding of each of the PEARLS expectations and how they relate to the PEARLS pillars/goals.
Being able to describe and recognize a higher order discussion.
Assessing your group during each session along the PEARLS pillars and goals to see which expectations they are meeting and which ones they are falling short on. Posing questions to group to allow them to self-discover areas needing improvement= “framing” the wrap-up.
Pushing your group through wrap-up framings and role modeling to achieve excellence in the deficient areas.
Knowing the PEARLS Developmental Expectations Students were asked to be able to demonstrate the
following:
•Explain the goals and pillars of the PEARLS program
•Adhere to the ground rules and recognize that they are informed by the goals and
pillars
•Consistently arrive on time for sessions
•Generate good learning objectives
•Consistently arrive prepared for sessions
•Contribute to good group dynamic
•Utilize the goal of the case to guide scope of discussion
•Utilize student roles of leader/timekeeper/scribe to organize sessions
Knowing the PEARLS Developmental Expectations Students were asked to be able to demonstrate the following:
•Explain the role of the facilitator and why we are process and not content
facilitators
•Articulate what constitutes a good self-assessment
•Articulate what constitutes a good group leader
•Perform constructive self and group assessment
•Modify behaviors based upon areas identified during self-assessment and
group feedback
•Experiment with different ways of integrating pharmacology into group
conversations
•Articulate the difference between a first order and a higher order conversation
•Prepare questions for discussion by group (triggers)
1.Why do medical schools use PBL/CBL programs?
2.What are the goals of the PEARLS program?
3.What are the PEARLS pillars?
4.How do the PEARLS pillars relate to the goals of the PEARLS program?
5.Why do we expect everyone to be on time all the time?
6.Why does every student have to prepare every LO for group instead of dividing
and conquering?
7.Why does everyone have to participate evenly in group?
8.Why do we have student roles in group (leader, timekeeper, scribe) and what is the
role of the student leader with regard to content?
9.Why shouldn’t students read directly off their notes during session?
10.What is the purpose of self and group assessments each session?
11. Why is it important to make sure group is on the same page with
respect to LO’s they have derived in Monday’s session?
12. Why do we make students generate LO’s in group instead of
giving them out at the start of a case?
13. Why should the facilitator sometimes allow group process to fail
without rescuing students during session?
14.What is the rationale for having students possibly leave a group with “wrong information”?
15. How and by whom will students be corrected if mis-information is discussed during a group discussion?
16. Define and describe the difference between a 1st order discussion and a higher order discussion?
17. How would you answer a student who asks what sources he/she should use in preparation for the learning issues?
18. How would you answer a student who asks why they have to change groups at the end of the course, especially if their group is working well and they don’t want to change?
19. What is the purpose of wrap-up?
20. What is the framing part of wrap-up and what is it based upon?