data harmonisation in theory and in practice case study...

20
Co-funded by the Community programme eContentplus European Network of Best Practices for Interoperability of Spatial Planning Information Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study Sumperk/Olomouc INSPIRE Conference 27.6. - 1.7. 2011 Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Upload: others

Post on 16-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Co-funded by the

Community programme

eContentplus

European Network of Best

Practices for Interoperability

of Spatial Planning Information

Data harmonisation

in theory and in practice

Case study Sumperk/Olomouc

INSPIRE Conference

27.6. - 1.7. 2011

Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova

Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Page 2: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Overview of the Presentation

• Plan4all participants and themes

• Data harmonisation idea

• Harmonisation steps

• Inputs into harmonisation process

• Transformation tables

• How to publish harmonised data

• Towards to INSPIRE data specification

Experience of Help forest Sumperk and Municipality of the

Olomouc city with LandUse data harmonisation within the

Plan4all project

Page 3: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Plan4all Participants and Themes

Plan4all - 24 partners from 15 European countries

• 16 of them test their own data sets

Annex II

• Land cover

Annex III

• Land use

• Utility and Government services

• Production and industrial facilities

• Agricultural and aquaculture facilities

• Area management/restriction/regulation zones and reporting

units

• Natural risk zones

Page 4: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Plan4all Harmonisation Idea

Source Data

HF

Source Data

MEDDTL

Source Data

LAZIO

Source Data

ADR

Source Data

EPF

Source Data

DIPSU

Source Data

AVINET

Source Data

MAC

Source Data

GIJONSource Data

NASURSA

Source Data

GEORAMA

Source Data

FTZ

Source Data

PROVROMA

Source Data

ZPR

Source Data

LGV

Source Data

TDF

Source Data

OLOMOUC

Conceptual

model

Target Data

Structure

Page 5: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Plan4all Harmonisation Idea

Source Data Transformation Harmonised data

Source Data HF

Number

Name_area

Number_area

LandUse_code

LandUse_descr

55

Source Data

Olomouc

Level

Layer

PLFEST

GLUF

MACRO

55

Plan4all

Land Use

model

Target Data Structure

InspireID

Status

RegulationNature

IsOverlayArea

Geometry

Property

LUCAs_Code

MacroClassificationOfL

and

GeneralLandUseType

SpecificLandUseType

55

Page 6: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Land Use data model modification

Necessary

Described in metadata

Optional

Not solved in this stage

Page 7: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Key field

Necessary fields

Optional fields

Land Use data model modification

Page 8: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Harmonization steps

1. Description of the source data structure – the exact description of

the source data enables better understanding of data and definition of the

transformation table. The description includes a scheme of data structure,

description of data formats, object types and Code lists or enumerations.

2. Data transformation – it is a main harmonisation process where data from

the original source structure is transformed into the target structure. The target data

structure is created on the basis of conceptual models. The transformation has two

levels – at first, the transformation of features has to be specified and then also

transformation of code lists or enumerations must be defined for each

transformed attribute. The transformation can be done through transformation tools

or directly through SQL query.

3. Publication – there are several ways how to publish the harmonised data

stored in the target structure. The Plan4all regions test the publication of the

harmonised spatial planning data in their own web map applications and also

provided the data through OGC web services WMS and WFS.

Page 9: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Source Data Description

Description of the source data

- General principle of the data management in regions

- Description of structures of the source data

- Translation of national terms

Page 10: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Data Transformation

Transformation methodes1. Transformation tools

2. Direct editing of database - SQL queries (used in Sumperk and Olomouc)

Data transformation process (HF example)

• The target structure has been established on the basis of LandUse conceptual data

model defined in WP4. Because this conceptual data model is not fully

corresponding to the source data structure, some modifications have been

proposed and only some of the fields have been used. The target database is

PostGIS.

• The transformation (harmonisation) scheme have been defined in two steps

• The scheme for attributes transformation

• The scheme for values transformation – comparison of enumerations of the

source and target data

• The target PostGIS tables have been filled on the basis of transformation

(harmonisation) schemes

Page 11: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Data Transformation

Transformation schemes1. Features transformation

2. Attributes transformation

Page 12: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Data Transformation

Transformation schemes1. Features transformation

2. Attributes transformation

Page 13: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Publication

Publication of Harmonised Data via Geohosting tool

• Web Map Client

• OGC Web Services (WMS, WFS)

Agreement on:

• Coordination system and projection: ETSR (EPSG 3035)

• Legends for Land Use data presentation

Page 14: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Publication

Map Compositions via Geohosting tool

Page 15: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Publication in Web Map Client

Original data Harmonised General Land Use Harmonised Status of Area

Page 16: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

WMS Compositions

Page 17: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Examples of Harmonised Data

Building Percentage

in developing areas Height indication

Page 18: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Examples of Harmonised Data

Specific LandUse Type Indirect Executions

Page 19: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Connection to INSPIRE

Plan4all project has been invited to participate in the testing of the

INSPIRE Annex II and III data specifications.

Plan4all joined to the INSPIRE testing team. Within the Plan4all wil be

tested the INSPIRE themes:

- Land Cover

- Land Use

- Natural Risk Zones

Plan4all conceptual data models will be replaced by INSPIRE

data specifications

=> the present experience with tests on conceptual models will be

re-used in following INSPIRE tests

Page 20: Data harmonisation in theory and in practice Case study ...inspire.ec.europa.eu/.../presentations/201.pdf · Petr Horak, Martin Vlk, Sarka Horakova Lea Manakova, Miloslav Dvorak

Thank you for your attention!

Petr Horak

[email protected]