data for decision maker

63
Spatial Information Visualization 16 September 2010 IRNet Brian Deal Urban and Regional Planning University of Illinois

Upload: illinois-resourcenet

Post on 16-Apr-2017

824 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Data for Decision Maker

Spatial Information Visualization

16 September 2010

IRNet

Brian DealUrban and Regional PlanningUniversity of Illinois

Page 2: Data for Decision Maker

• Where are we now?▫ Understanding the current state of the region provides a baseline

to evaluate policy options and future impacts

• Where do we want to be?▫ Answering this question requires a vision and communal

consensus about the future of the region

• How do we get there?▫ Planners and stakeholders need to be able to envision future

alternatives and evaluate their potential consequences

Fundamental Questions for Planning

Requires planning tools!

Page 3: Data for Decision Maker

Garden CitiesEbenezer Howard (early 20th century)

New Urbanism Duany, Plater-Zyberk, Calthorpe (1980s-present)

Urban Spatial Visions …

Towers in the SkyLe Corbusier (early 20th century modernism)

Broad AcreFrank Lloyd Wright (1930s)

Page 4: Data for Decision Maker

Where are we now?

Page 5: Data for Decision Maker

Do our plans consider…• Resident age?• Race?• Employment?• Income?• Family composition?• Resident health?

Page 6: Data for Decision Maker

“Our Neighborhood” Census Tract 2City of ChampaignChampaign Township Champaign CountyState of Illinois

Page 7: Data for Decision Maker

How does the per capita income of our neighborhood compare to the rest of the city, the region, state, and nation?

Racial composition?

Home ownership (Tenure)?

Education level? Gee whiz Brian, How do we find

this data?

Page 8: Data for Decision Maker

Geography TRACTMedian HH income 1999

Median FAM inc 1999 % Drove to Work Alone % NON-WHITE %_HU_OwnOcc %HU_NO_VEHC

Census Tract 2, Champaign County, Illinois 2 21728 24,107 95.33799534 91.53506001 53.05410122 27.05061082

Census Tract 9.01, Champaign County, Illinois 9.01 26669 34,130 94.95450786 49.01840491 46.9808542 9.818360334

Census Tract 9.02, Champaign County, Illinois 9.02 50827 61,250 94.13622012 16.73215455 80.29520295 2.287822878

Census Tract 10, Champaign County, Illinois 10 38155 51,695 93.01788806 14.39227731 52.02918377 10.85271318

Census Tract 11, Champaign County, Illinois 11 60523 67,391 91.76313446 8.786724701 83.43446602 5.946601942

Census Tract 12.05, Champaign County, Illinois 12.05 68438 77,978 88.3070666 14.65240642 96.7340591 2.177293935

Census Tract 12.06, Champaign County, Illinois 12.06 95027 113,335 87.73800457 11.12745098 87.29216152 0

Census Tract 14, Champaign County, Illinois 14 31875 58,152 84.53006421 26.90217391 28.93175074 6.083086053

Census Tract 53, Champaign County, Illinois 53 22254 26,806 83.51498638 58.06835067 36.25 14.6875

Census Tract 56, Champaign County, Illinois 56 31272 37,449 77.11757269 28.73174207 48.56589147 10.65891473

Census Tract 57, Champaign County, Illinois 57 45485 65,285 64 22.45096675 55.98919243 13.41939358

Census Tract 58, Champaign County, Illinois 58 35714 84,540 60 14.87016169 47.51570531 9.594517419

Census Tract 59, Champaign County, Illinois 59 10224 29,286 42.03993524 33.80789022 4.6875 31.71875

Census Tract 60, Champaign County, Illinois 60 22533 22,188 29.22050855 54.46616541 4.860088365 22.82768778

Census Tract 106.02, Champaign County, Illinois 106.2 51896 58,667 25.32663317 2.955725946 80.24857239 3.829358415

Collect the data from the Census!

Page 9: Data for Decision Maker

MidwestWest

South

Northeast

CENSUS REGION

The US Census Bureau divides the entire USA into four “Regions”…

Page 10: Data for Decision Maker

CENSUS DIVISIONS (9)

PacificMountain

West North Central

West South Central

East North Central

East SouthCentral South

Atlantic

Middle Atlantic

New England

… and nine “Divisions”

Page 11: Data for Decision Maker

COUNTIES (3,140)

….3,140 US Counties

Page 12: Data for Decision Maker

Illinois (102 Counties)

The State of Illinois has 102 Counties.

Page 13: Data for Decision Maker

Illinois (2966 Census Tracts)

Champaign County

….2966 Census Tracts

Census tracts•small, relatively permanent statistical subdivisions of a county•most metropolitan areas (MA's) •usually have between 2,500 and 8,000 persons •designed to be homogeneous with respect to population, economic status, and living conditions•census tracts do not cross county boundaries•spatial size of census tracts varies widely depending on density •physical changes may require occasional revisions

Page 14: Data for Decision Maker

Champaign County (41 Census Tracts)

There tend to be more census tracts where

there are more people.

When they cluster in cities, they are about the size of what we’d

consider a neighborhood.

Page 15: Data for Decision Maker

Urbanized areas

Champaign-Urbana

ooo2

Page 16: Data for Decision Maker

Census Tracts in the Champaign Urbana Area

1 mile

ooo2

Page 17: Data for Decision Maker

1 mile

Census Tracts and Block Groups in the Champaign Urbana Area

Census Tracts are further divided into

several “Block Groups” and then into very small “Blocks” (not

pictured)

For the purpose of this presentation, we are

advocates for a neighborhood in Census Tract 2 in

Champaign County

Page 18: Data for Decision Maker

Census Fact Finder

Decennial Census

Choose your survey instrument. The Decennial census, implemented every ten years, contains information at census tract level.

• http://factfinder.census.gov

American Community Survey

Page 19: Data for Decision Maker

Census Fact Finder

• http://factfinder.census.gov

“Get Data”

Page 20: Data for Decision Maker

Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF 3) Sample Data. Also known as the census “long form”

Choose your data set. Make sure you’re choosing from the 2000 Census. Summary File 3 contains more detailed data on community characteristics.

“Detailed Tables”

Page 21: Data for Decision Maker

“Next”

Select your geographies. We’re going to choose the entire nation, the State of Illinois, Champaign County, the City of Champaign, and Census Tract 2 (our “neighborhood”)

Page 22: Data for Decision Maker

Select the individual variables you want to know about. Here we have selected “Total Population,”

“Race,” etc.

Show result!

Page 23: Data for Decision Maker

When you request data for many census tracts, it’s often difficult to read all of them at once. It’s easiest to download

the census data as an MS Excel file.

Download the data as an excel file.

Page 24: Data for Decision Maker
Page 25: Data for Decision Maker
Page 26: Data for Decision Maker
Page 27: Data for Decision Maker
Page 28: Data for Decision Maker

“Thematic Maps”

Generating Thematic Maps

with Census Data

MAP IT!

Page 29: Data for Decision Maker

Choose your geography. Thematic maps will break down this geography into smaller levels. Here, we’ve chosen Champaign County, Illinois.

Page 30: Data for Decision Maker

Now choose the “theme” or specific census datum that you want to see mapped. Here we’ve chosen “Per Capita Income in 1999.” All mapped themes are per capita or percent variables– they are not “raw” data.

Page 31: Data for Decision Maker

Full County View.

Zoom in to see Census Tract 2, our neighborhood.

Pan, Identify, Get Data

Sub-geographies: Tracts, County Subdivision, Blog Groups, etc.

Page 32: Data for Decision Maker

“Per capita income (1999) of Census Tract 2 is in the lowest income quintile of all census tracts in Champaign County with per capita income $11, 064.”

Per Capita Income by census tract

Page 33: Data for Decision Maker

“While some census tracts in the Champaign-Urbana metro area display income variation, per capita income (1999) of ALL census block groups in Census Tract 2 are in the lowest income quintile of census tracts in Champaign County with per capita income $11, 064.”

University of Illinois

Per Capita Income by census block group

Page 34: Data for Decision Maker

Percent of Persons 25 Years and Over with Bachelor's Degree or Higher: 2000

“Educational attainment in Census Tract 2 is relatively low compared to other tracts in Champaign-Urbana. Although one block group has relatively high rate of post-secondary education, most block groups are in the lowest quintile of post-secondary educational

Page 35: Data for Decision Maker

How does the per capita income of our neighborhood compare to the rest of the city, the region, state, and nation? Per capita income in our neighborhood is lower than national, state, regional, and local income levels.

Racial composition? The racial composition of our neighborhood is overwhelmingly African American (85.54%), exceeding national, state, regional, and local levels.

Home ownership (Tenure)? Our neighborhood has nearly equal levels of home owners (53%) and renters (47%), but has relatively more renters than the nation, state, and region. The City of Champaign has a larger portion of renters, most like due to a large student population.

Education level? Our neighborhood has relatively low levels of post-secondary education, but only ten percentage points lower than the national average.

Page 36: Data for Decision Maker

• Where are we now?▫ Understanding the current state of the region provides a baseline

to evaluate policy options and future impacts

• Where do we want to be?▫ Answering this question requires a vision and communal

consensus about the future of the region

• How do we get there?▫ Planners and stakeholders need to be able to envision future

alternatives and evaluate their potential consequences

Fundamental Questions for Planning

Requires planning tools!

Page 37: Data for Decision Maker

•Census data reveals a snapshot of the way we are now▫Avoid data collection for collections sake▫Looking for correlations

•How do we target specific questions?▫modeling

•What about the future?

Page 38: Data for Decision Maker

What if you were able to …•Visualize the likely land use consequences of

policy and investments

•Assess the impacts of those investments

•Determine sustainable outcomes

•Assist communities vision their future using real data

•Have a common platform for multiple models

Page 39: Data for Decision Maker

What if you were able to …•Provide decision-makers with clear policy

choices based on a defensible knowledge base

•Show decision-makers the impacts of policy options on multiple resources (land/water/air/utilities/transportation/education)

•Tie regional planning in with economic forecasts

•Model alternative strategies in real time and not wait for traditional plans that take months - years

Page 40: Data for Decision Maker

LEAMplan

Page 41: Data for Decision Maker

Informed Decision-MakingBy better realization of the implications, this system has

assisted policymakers in:

• deciding whether to require 40-acre minimum zoning in a rural county

• generating transportation analysis zones

• prioritizing transportation improvement program projects

• designating and outlining areas for protection from development

• how to allocate Community Development Block Grant funds

How has it been used?

Page 42: Data for Decision Maker

Mapping Development•Growth over space

Page 43: Data for Decision Maker

Mapping Development•Growth over time

Page 44: Data for Decision Maker

Growth by …

Watershed School District

Census Block Group

Page 45: Data for Decision Maker

Transportation Projects-Comparison Map•Showing development shifts

Page 46: Data for Decision Maker

Transportation Projects-Comparison Map•Same analysis – satellite view

Page 47: Data for Decision Maker

Transit-Oriented Development•Growth Nodes

Page 48: Data for Decision Maker

Champaign-Urbana Mobility-Enhanced Development-Zones•Growing up … not out

Page 49: Data for Decision Maker

Champaign-Urbana Mobility-Enhanced Development-Redevelopment

University Policy ??

Page 50: Data for Decision Maker

Groundwater Protection Mask

Page 51: Data for Decision Maker

Groundwater Protection Change Map

Page 52: Data for Decision Maker

Green Infrastructure Stress

Page 53: Data for Decision Maker

Green Infrastructure Change•Policy context – where to focus attention

Page 54: Data for Decision Maker

Measuring Impacts•SCALDS Modeling

Page 55: Data for Decision Maker

Water Demand

Page 56: Data for Decision Maker

Getting More Out of the Process• A single platform for visioning, modeling, plan

creation / coordination, and decision-making• Wider/broader leveraging of expertise• Results and analysis are

available and accessible• Decision-makers able to readily analyze alternatives & consequences

An opportunity

Page 57: Data for Decision Maker

Making Plans More Usable – • Bring together plans from diverse agencies and

jurisdictions to a single location

• Standardize formats, streamline temporal and spatial parameters

• Build a digital and easily accessible repository

• Create intelligent retrieval systems

An opportunity

Page 58: Data for Decision Maker

LEAM Components•Base land use change model•Economic Forecast• Impact modeling •GeoPortal – Customized Access & Display of

Information•Desktop – Utilizing the model thru cloud

computing

Page 59: Data for Decision Maker

LEAM Planning Portal• Based on open source content

management system (CMS) known as Plone

• Rich content – documents, maps, graphs

• Live, full-text search• Flexible navigation capability• Integrated comment system• Security, workflow, and revision

history• User Administration• Intranet-Internet

Page 60: Data for Decision Maker

www.leam.illinois.edu/cu

Page 61: Data for Decision Maker

LEAM Desktop• User runs LEAM and

custom models through web services

• Model inputs are automatically organized, documented, and reviewable

• Long running models executed “in the cloud”

• Rich set of results available in GeoPortal to allow model review

Page 62: Data for Decision Maker

LEAM Plan Features …An online content management system that:

• Brings key players into communication

• Packages maps, text, and analysis for ease of use

• Provides User developed scenario modeling

• Facilitates identification of long-term implications of nearby decisions and policy

• Allows for review and open discussion of new analysis done from within the system

• Presents information in a digitally standardized, interactive format

• Employs intelligent indexing and live search

Key benefits

Page 63: Data for Decision Maker

Conclusions• Census data is useful for planning

▫ Where are now• New tools for assessing the future

▫ Planning Support Tools (LEAM)• These tools provide:

▫ Coordinated communication between agencies▫ Potential multiple agency labor and technology cost savings▫ Central repository for supporting documentation▫ Improved plan efficiency and performance▫ Reduce/control risk of conflicting action plans▫ Immediate feedback generation▫ Complete electronic history/automatic archiving▫ Benchmarking and shared best practices across agencies▫ Increased visibility to the public and stakeholders

Key benefits