Data Driven:Using District Comparisons

Capital Region ESDOctober 22, 2014

Tim Stensager, Director of Data GovernanceDivision of Assessment and Student Information

Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Vision

Every student ready for career, college and life

OSPI’s Mission

To provide funding, resources, tools, data and technical assistance that enable educators to ensure students succeed in our public schools, are prepared to access post-secondary training and education, and are equipped to thrive in their careers and lives.

OSPI Performance Indicators – all disaggregated

Achievement: The percentage of students demonstrating the characteristics of entering kindergartners

in all six areas as identified by the Washington Kindergarten Inventory of Developing Skills (WaKIDS)

The percentage of students meeting standard on the 3rd, 8th and 11th grade statewide English Language Arts (ELA) and math assessments, and 8th-grade statewide science assessment

Percentage of students making adequate growth toward proficiency in ELA/math as determined by Student Growth Percentiles in 4th and 6th grades

The percentage of students enrolled and the percentage who earned high school credits in Algebra I/Integrated Math I by the end of 8th grade, and by the end of 9th grade

The percentage of students meeting standard on all state assessments required for graduation, by the end of 10th grade

The percentage of students enrolled in dual credit programs and the percentage of students who earned dual credits and certificates (e.g., AP, IB, Running Start, Tech Prep)

The percentage of students who took the SAT and ACT, and the average SAT and ACT scores earned

The percentage of high school graduates who were academically prepared and attended post-secondary education institutions within one year of graduating high school

The percentage of students who accessed financial aid for college Percentage of students who persisted in post-secondary programs and completed

certificates and degrees Dropout Prevention and Graduation:

Four-year and five-year graduation rates ELA, math, and science course failure rates in 9th grade Suspensions and expulsions Attendance, especially chronic absenteeism

Intervention Code

Total Distinct

Students Enrolled At Any Time

During the Year

Total Incidents Resulting in

SS/LS/EX

% of Incidents (not distinct

students)

Total Distinct Students with

Incidents Resulting in

SS/LS/EX

% of Interventions

(distinct students)

% Students

with Incidents Resulting

in SS/LS/EX

NOT RETURNED: Total Distinct Students with

Incidents Resulting in

SS/LS/EX and with NO Student

Enrollment on May 31st

% of Students

with SS/LS/EX

and with NO Student

Enrollment on May 31st

Total Distinct

Students WITHOUT SS/LS/EX

NOT RETURNED:

Total Distinct Students

WITHOUT SS/LS/EX and

with NO Student

Enrollment on May 31st

% of Students WITHOUT

SS/LS/EX and with NO Student

Enrollment on May 31st

Total Dropout Rate

EX 1,124,535 2,529 3.3% 2,321 4.7% 0.2% 273 11.8% 1,079,816 18,673

LS 1,124,535 4,375 5.7% 4,027 8.1% 0.4% 308 7.6% 1,079,816 18,673

SS 1,124,535 69,763 91.0% 43,483 87.3% 3.9% 1,032 2.4% 1,079,816 18,673

Total 1,124,535 76,667 100% 49,831 100% 4.4% 1,613 3.24% 1,079,816 18,673 1.7% 1.8%

4.7%

8.1%

87.3%

% of Interventions (distinct students) 4.4% of total students

EXLSSS

This represents .2% of total students

School Year of 2012-13State Total Distinct Student Enrollment

State % of All Enrolled

Total Distinct Students 1195293 100%Hispanic / Latino of any race(s) 214143 17.9%American Indian / Alaskan Native 16350 1.4%Asian 75133 6.3%Black / African American 48265 4.0%Native Hawaiian / Other Pacific Islander 9658 0.8%White 620766 51.9%Two or More Races 66770 5.6%Not Provided 57 0.0%

Total

Distinct

Studen

ts

White

Hispan

ic / La

tino of any r

ace(s)

Asian

Two or M

ore Race

s

Black /

African

American

American

Indian

/ Alas

kan Nati

ve

Native

Hawaii

an / O

ther Paci

fic Islan

der

Not Pro

vided

100%

52%

18%

6% 6% 4% 1% 1% 0%

State Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity

59%20%

7%

6%

5%

2% 1% 0%

State Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity

White

Hispanic / Latino of any race(s)

Asian

Two or More Races

Black / African American

American Indian / Alaskan Native

Native Hawaiian / Other Pacific Islander

Not Provided

Total Distinct Students 1195293 100% 47351

Hispanic / Latino of any race(s) 214143 17.9% 11853

American Indian / Alaskan Native 16350 1.4% 1316

Asian 75133 6.3% 1247

Black / African American 48265 4.0% 5586

Native Hawaiian / Other Pacific Islander 9658 0.8% 655

White 620766 51.9% 23091

Two or More Races 66770 5.6% 3428

Not Provided 57 0.0% 2

White Black Hispanic Asian0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Percent in Population

Percent of sub-group suspended

No Disproportionality

White

Hispanic / Latino of any race(s)

Asian

Two or More Races

Black / African American

American Indian / Alaskan Native

Native Hawaiian / Other Pacific Islander

52%

18%

6%

6%

4%

1%

1%

49%

25%

3%

7%

12%

3%

1%

% of Enrolled Students compared to % of Percent of Students with SS, LS, or EX State % of All Enrolled

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25Discipline - Disproportionality by Subgroups by Year

Ra

ng

e o

f D

isp

rop

ort

ion

alit

y

District/School

Larger Disproportionality at 5 – 10%

Wireframe Only

Small Disproportionality at+ or – 5%

Conway School Dis trict G riffin School Dis trict Dieringer School Dis trict Raymond School Dis trict Ephrata School Dis trict Cle Elum-Ros lyn School Dis trict Bellevue School Dis trict La Center School Dis trict Royal School Dis trict North Franklin School Dis trictSedro-Woolley School Dis trict Clover Park School Dis trict Central Kitsap School Dis trict Auburn School Dis trict Mount Baker School District Franklin Pierce School Dis trict Darrington School Dis trict Mary Walker School Dis trict G oldendale School Dis trict0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

18.0%

20.0%Percentage of distinct students with EX, SS, LS by district

This red line is the state avg. @ 4.2% of all students

-15 35 85 135 185 2350

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Adjusted Actual 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate 2012

Districts/Schools

Perc

ent o

f G

radu

ates

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2012 On-Time Grad Rates (4-Year)

Free

& R

educ

ed L

unch

Rat

es

75% 92%75% 92%

2012 4 Year Grad Rate High Schools with more than 50 9th graders

XXXXSchool District

20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Axis Title

Axis Title

XXXXSchool District

20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

High SchoolAlternative Secondary School

High School

High School

Axis Title

Axis Title

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0

FRL

Adjusted 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate

District Adjusted 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate 2013 vs FRL All Districts

State Low-IncomeRate

State Low-IncomeGrad Rate

State Grad Rate

-25.0 -20.0 -15.0 -10.0 -5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0

Free & Reduced Lunch (FRL) Graduation Rate Disproportionality for 2013 Graduates

If you are at -10.0, your FRL students graduated at 10 percentage points lower than the rest of the students.

If you are a school on the 0.0 axis, your FRL students graduated at the same rate as the rest of the students

-100.0

-80.0

-60.0

-40.0

-20.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

2013 Graduation Rate for All Students was 76%

If your school is on the 0.0 Axis, you graduated 76%

If you are on the -20.0 axis, you graduated 56% (76% - 20% = 56%)

-25.0 -20.0 -15.0 -10.0 -5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0

-80.0

-70.0

-60.0

-50.0

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.02013 Graduation Rate Variation compared to Free & Reduced Lunch Students Disproportionality

This school has higher than stateAvg. Grad rates of 86% (76% state avg + 10% = 86%)

Their students on FRL graduated At the same rate as the other Students – since they are at 0.0On the horizontal scale.

This school has higher than state Avg Grad rates of 91% (76% = 15%)

But their FRL students graduated At a rate 20% lower than all students

This school had a lower grad rate From state avg of 46% (76% - 30%)

They had no FRL disproportionalitySince they are on the 0.0 axis for FRL disproportionality.

StrategicTactical

Annual

Monthly

Weekly

Daily

Bi-Annual

Teacher Grade Lev/Dept

District State/Leg/Gov/ Policy

OSPI/ESDSchool BrdSchool Federal Gov

Time

Student Information System (SIS)

K-12 Warehouse/CEDARS