dan mclean director outsourcing and it utility services ...$700m manulife financial and ibm gs ... *...

28
www.idc.com Dan McLean Director Outsourcing and IT Utility Services Research Outsourcing A growing Canadian concern

Upload: others

Post on 11-Mar-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

www.idc.com

Dan McLeanDirector

Outsourcing and IT Utility Services Research

OutsourcingA growing Canadian concern

An Industry CrateredWW IT Spending Growth (%)

1999 2000 2001 2002

10.8% 10.4%

-3.5%

-0.5%

We’ve Been Here BeforeWe’ve Been Here Before40 Years of Worldwide IT Spending % Growth$ Billions

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

$900

$1,000 -75%

-50%

-25%

1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s

The mainframe crash

Oil crisesThe PC crash

The Gulf war

Vietnam

Reunification

Y2K

9/11

Source: IDC 2002 Source: IDC, 2003

2002 – A Year in Review in Outsourcing2002 – A Year in Review in Outsourcing

Many Canadian contracts appeared:$2.2B Canada Post and CGI $2.1B CIBC and HP Services$1.1B Bombardier and CSC$1B Hydro One and CGE&Y$700M Manulife Financial and IBM GS$250M Sun Life and IBM GS$200M Desjardins Group and CGI$250M Alcan and CGI$200M Stelco and EDS

Typically seven- to 10-year contracts

2002 - Competitive Review

Global Services

hp services

Business Consulting ServicesPwC Consulting

Deloitte Consulting

BRAXTON

The Market in 2003The Market in 2003

Business Outsourcing

Logistics $2.5B Cust. Care $1.4BHR $1.9B F&A $1.3B

Outsourcing in Canada

Network &DesktopOutsourcing

$1.2B

ApplicationsOutsourcing

$1.0B

IS Outsourcing$3.9B

Systems Infrastructure SP $419M

Canadian IT Outsourcing Services SpendingCanadian IT Outsourcing Services Spending

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

IT Services XSPs (Sys. infrastructureSP + ApplnSP)Network and Desktop OutsourcingIS OutsourcingApplication Management

Source: IDC Canada, 2003

C$M

17.2%8.1%

6.1%

7.6%

CAGR 02-07

Top Canadian IT Services FirmsTop Canadian IT Services FirmsC&I%Estimated Canadian Services Revenues* C$M FY2002

1. IBM Global Services Canada (incl. PwC Consulting) 2,885 30%

2. CGI Group3. EDS Canada

8. TELUS

10. Fujitsu Consulting

5. Cap Gemini Ernst & Young

9. CSC Canada

7. Accenture

1,5681,220

850

293

260

380

284

307

4. HP Services Canada (not incl. Intria-HP)

Source: IDC, 2003

6. Cognicase 375

Others: DC/Braxton $218m; BearingPoint $140m (90%+)

34%

19%34%

32%

75%9%5%

76%

24%

* Based on IDC estimates for non-captive Canadian services revenue only, product flow-through removed, based on FYE

3. EDS Canada

2. CGI Group

7. Telus

10. Accenture

5. Cognicase

8. Cap Gemini Ernst & Young

6. CSC Canada

730

1,192

340

207

76

313

140

268

9. AT&T Canada

•Based on IDC estimates for Canadian outsourcing services revenue only, product flow-through removed, based on FYE•Includes BPO revenue

108

4. Bell Canada

Source: IDC 2002

Top Canadian IT Outsourcing FirmsTop Canadian IT Outsourcing Firms2002Est. Canadian Outsourcing Services Revenues C$M

1. IBM Global Services Canada (incl. PwC Consulting) 1,405

What About the Telcos?What About the Telcos?

More selective investment in IT services?More targeted customer and service approach?What might the Telcos do with their IT service properties? Bulk them up for eventual sale?Greater bundling of communication and IT services?

Determining Factor in Organizations’ Decision to Outsource ActivitiesDetermining Factor in Organizations’ Decision to Outsource Activities

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Other

Merger/Acquisition

Change in SeniorExecutive levelmanagement

Technology audit

Poor businessperformance

Percentage

N=100; Q18. What event ultimately prompted – or would prove to be the determining factor – in your organization’s decision to outsource an activity?Source: IDC Canada, 2002

Preferred Type of Outsourcing RelationshipsPreferred Type of Outsourcing Relationships

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Don't Know

Equity swap

Client/vendor jointventure

Preferred supplieragreement

Contracted outsourcingagreement

Percentage

A way to ensure SP has a stake in success?

N=100; Q19. If you were to outsource a significant portion of your IT, what type of outsourcing relationship would you prefer?Source: IDC Canada, 2002

Benefits derived from outsourcing – a matchBenefits derived from outsourcing – a match

0 10 20 30 40 50

Increased customer satisfaction

Improve business processes

Convert fixed costs to variable

Intro new/improved products/svcs

Lower capital investment costs

Lower operational costs

Improve focus on core business

Access to skills resources

Percentage

Currently OS-NoCurrently OS-YesTotal

N=177; A04. What do you perceive are the top 2 benefits/value derived from outsourcing?Source: IDC Canada, 2003

If Outsourcing, Organization Prefers to Retain Control Over…If Outsourcing, Organization Prefers to Retain Control Over…

0 10 20 30 40 50

DK/Refused

People

Process design

Day to daymanagement

Service levels

Business outcomes

Strategy

Percentage

Currently OS-NoCurrently OS-YesTotal

N=177; A07. If or when considering to outsource an aspect of your business, what ONE aspect of control of your outsourcing arrangement do you prefer to retain?Source: IDC Canada, 2003

Recent Canadian Research in OutsourcingRecent Canadian Research in Outsourcing

Q1 Ipanel Survey of 190 business and IT key decision makersApproximately 80% say they’ll renew with existing providers (IT,NDOS, applications and business OS)37% of NDOS users, 29% of Business OS users and 20% of IT OS users say they’ll expand scope of contracts upon renewal.Flexibility seen most often as the key factor that fosters trust in outsourcing

Trust – The Deal Maker or BreakerMore than 35% say it is the deciding factor to ultimately signing a contractAn additional 35% say it is a consideration of higher importancethan other factors

What’s Trust?What’s Trust?

Informs of subcontracting/offshore outsourcingWillingness to take equity stake in clients' businessWillingness to "open its books" Contributes to discussion of clients' IT/Business alignmentSuperior understanding of technologyWillingness to be accountable for clients' business performanceTakes action before being askedMaintains "high personal touch" with clientsPredictable costsAdheres to SLAFlexibility

Mirror, Mirror – Two UniversesMirror, Mirror – Two UniversesOutsourcing

CUSTOMIZED-always a one off-sees transfer of

assets and people-fixed contract

Each piece represents a key area of activity in outsourcing. Collectively it can define all types of deals. Network

Systems

Apps

Biz

Network

Systems

Apps

Biz

Utility

Networks

Systems

Apps

Biz

STANDARDSERVICES

-pay as you go- feature function

built upon a base service

-recurring fee structured

Makes sense here

Could move to hereCommodity

But can it work here?Unique

Network

Systems

Apps

Biz

Network

Systems

Apps

Biz

OutsourcingIT Utility

Service OfferingStandard Services Customized Services

IT ArchitectureUtility Service provider defines Customer Defines

AssetsUSP defines and owns

Customer/Vendor defines, both may own

Operations ManagementStandard part of offering Customer defines

FinancingPay per use Contract

Critical Year for Utility ServicesCritical Year for Utility ServicesHosting has existed for a few years. Challenge will be to drive richer implementations and greater investment.Key message might be that ebusiness is a strong way to attract new customers at a lower costNot all are convinced that Utility has value. Some suggest everycustomer wants customization when purchasing services.Can utility service providers deliver “mass customization” that provides unique value add?Utility seems to be a compelling offering as an infrastructure service where customers purchase computing power based on performance, reliability, availability, application and businessprocess support. Does this demand high customization?Are the right customers being targeted? Small business could benefit enormously, but few service providers want to engage these customers.

The Road to UtilityThe Road to Utility

Voice/DataConvergence

WebServices

ComputingUtility

SmartAgents

Automation

Relationship Between IT and BusinessRelationship Between IT and Business

Evolution of Business Priorities

Evolution of ITArchitectures

Relationship Between IT and BusinessRelationship Between IT and Business

Agile Business

Utility Computing

AdaptiveComputing

Web-Based Computing

Client/Server

CostControl

Focus on Core Competence

BusinessTransformation

Outsourcing Accelerates Business TransformationOutsourcing Accelerates Business Transformation

Broader Company Non-Core Operations, Human Resources. Customer Service, Accounting,

Logistics

Broader IS OperationsApplications, Help Desk

Desktops, NetworksData Center Operations

1990 -1995 -

2000 -2005 -

2010

Client/Server

Web-Based Computing

Utility Computing

AdaptiveComputing

CostControl

Focus on Core Competence

Mutual Gains Re-investMutual Gains

BusinessTransformation

Summary and ObservationsSummary and Observations

Utility – Pros and ConsUtility – Pros and Cons

Utility presents a real alternative to outsourcing:More selective A real option for small/medium businessPay as you go – pay for what you use. No long-term contractIT infrastructure as a “utility” seems inevitable

But there are doubters:Traditional O/S companies will say it doesn’t work, but the truth is many aren’t interested in serving the medium/small business market.Traditional communication service companies should be pretty good at this. The model fits their businesses

ThoughtsThoughtsIt’s now about business transformation, not simply cost savings

Trust is an essential element and service providers will be working to figure out what that is and how to turn that into a value differentiator

When budgets are tight, then companies start looking more closely at the value of outsourcing

Technology may be core to your business, but is the day-to-day operation of IT essential?Likewise with business functions – the things that might be handed off are the operational aspects of HR, finance and accounting, logistics, and customer care

ThoughtsThoughtsIf a customer does not have a clear understanding of IT costs, then they should not outsource.

Is there a trend towards dealing with advisors and brokers? Would they be helpful to you?

General rule in outsourcing is have an exist strategy:- Are you equipped to take over when the contract expires- Be vigilant in measuring performance and value

What’s in store for IT service providers in 2003?- Are telcos still targeting IT services? There’s evidence to

suggest some are looking to retrench into familiar territory. Bell, Aliant (want to sell xwave), Telus.

- Consultants also want to be outsourcers – Accenture, CGI, Bearing Point

- One-stop shops

Questions?Questions?

Please email me at

[email protected]