daimler vs bauman disclosure

1
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case. Holding: Daimler cannot be sued in California for injuries allegedly caused by conduct of its Argentinian subsidiary when that conduct took place entirely outside of the United States. Judgment: Reversed , 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on January 14, 2014. Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Feb 6 2012 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 8, 2012) Feb 27 2012 Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner. Mar 5 2012 Waiver of right of respondents Barbara Bauman, et al. to respond filed. Mar 6 2012 Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents. Mar 7 2012 Brief amici curiae of Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, Inc., et al. filed. Mar 8 2012 Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. Mar 8 2012 Brief amicus curiae of New England Legal Foundation filed. Mar 14 2012 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 30, 2012. Mar 21 2012 Response Requested . (Due April 20, 2012)

Upload: gabriella-goodfield

Post on 19-Dec-2015

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Discription of a court case

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Daimler vs Bauman Disclosure

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various

capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case.

Holding: Daimler cannot be sued in California for injuries allegedly caused by conduct of its

Argentinian subsidiary when that conduct took place entirely outside of the United States.

Judgment: Reversed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on January 14, 2014. Justice Sotomayor

filed an opinion concurring in the judgment.

Feb 6

2012 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 8, 2012)

Feb 27

2012

Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither

party, received from counsel for the petitioner.

Mar 5

2012 Waiver of right of respondents Barbara Bauman, et al. to respond filed.

Mar 6

2012

Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither

party, received from counsel for the respondents.

Mar 7

2012 Brief amici curiae of Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, Inc., et al. filed.

Mar 8

2012

Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al.

filed.

Mar 8

2012 Brief amicus curiae of New England Legal Foundation filed.

Mar 14

2012 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 30, 2012.

Mar 21

2012 Response Requested . (Due April 20, 2012)