d october 19, 2018
TRANSCRIPT
Page 1
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC KING
SUBJECT: WEEKLY REPORT
DATE: OCTOBER 19, 2018
Upcoming City Council meetings and other events
November 7, work session at 5:00 p.m., regular meeting at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall in the Council Chambers
November 21, No Meeting
December 5, work session at 5:00 p.m., regular meeting at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall in the Council Chambers
December 19, work session at 5:00 p.m., regular meeting at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall in the Council Chambers
Licensing Program Data Attached you’ll find an internal memo from Licensing Program Manager Lorelei Williams on the current licensing program data. In December Lorelei will be sending a more comprehensive report with status updates. Police Update The Call For Service summary the Police have received year to date is attached. The non-emergency calls are down and officer initiated calls are up again. The 911 emergency calls have stabilized at a manageable 2.2% increase. Quarterly Reporting from Plante Moran on LEAP Program Below is the regular status report for the end of the 3rd quarter. The two things that stood out to me were: (i) “Risks and Issues” on page 5 reporting one risk closed, and another reduced over the summer; and (ii) the forthcoming release of an RFP for replacement software for Muni Court administration. DAQ Maps Rick Allen from RL Allen Group, LLC sent the attached DAQ maps of sensor test results from the Bend area that show the testing locations and DAQ score range based on industry standards. Remember 3.0 – 3.3 is Public Standard (public agencies like public works etc.) and 3.4 or above meets or exceeds the Public Safety Standard (Fire and Police). Rick noted, “You will notice very few “white” dots with a number in them, those are the 3.0 to 3.3. All “green” or “green shaded” dots meet or exceed Public Safety standards. There are no red or orange dots on any map. You will notice out around Deschutes Jct., both portable tests, show the worst results, not bad just not as good. When I drive through there I used to lose my cell signal all the time, there is some dead spot out there we might need to review, but that is outside the City limits and the mobiles worked fine, portables were close to meeting the standard of 3.4.”
710 WALL STREET PO BOX 431
BEND, OR 97709 [541] 963-2118
TEL [541] 388-5519
FAX www.bendoregon.gov
Page 2
BEDAB Update from Ben Hemson Here’s your weekly update while on a quick break during another great Bend Venture Conference, hats off to the folks at EDCO for all of their hard work. New BEDAB Appointees The two openings for three-year terms on BEDAB were filled at Wednesday’s Council meeting. Council appointed Lisa Goodman, Public Information Officer, St. Charles Health System and Brenda Spiers, CEO, Buzztag to three year terms. Jennifer Moore, Owner, JEM Raw Organics and Kara Tachikawa, Executive Director, Inspire Early Learning Centers were selected as first and second alternates respectively. BEDAB received 14 applications, which was a great turnout. I’ll be following up with those that weren’t selected to discuss other ways to get involved either with BEDAB or via other committees that have openings looming. BEDAB Check in with Council On Wednesday BEDAB Chair, Stephanie Senner, spoke with Council at the City Boards and Commissions quarterly check in. Stephane reviewed recent BEDAB efforts and upcoming initiatives but the majority of the update was to provide feedback on the City’s upcoming Community Survey, which hasn’t been performed since 2014. The feedback on the Community Survey was limited to themes rather than suggesting specific questions. Along with urging Council to keep many of the questions from prior surveys to gauge how the community is changing, these were the key themes laid out in Stephanie’s comments:
State of the workforce: o Are respondents currently employed and what is their employment situation
(i.e. large business, work from home, entrepreneur, etc.) o If unemployed or not working, are there barriers that keep the respondent
from participating in the workforce?
City’s role in Economic Development: o Is the city doing its part to prepare for Bend’s changing economy? Or what
role does the City play in developing the future economy? o Perceptions around the business friendliness of the City of Bend
Council will review the committee feedback at their next meeting and make suggestions for the survey firm, DHM, to incorporate into the effort which will be completed in early 2019. 14th Street Reopens The ribbon cutting for the 14th Street Reconstruction Project is today, ending an effort that took roughly six months and included three separate construction stages. While the project made it inconvenient for anyone trying to drive around in the area, it also caused some pain for businesses, especially during the first stage near the Simpson and 14th Roundabout. I know there are some folks on the commercial corridor who are really looking forward to things returning to normal.
Page 3
The completion of 14th Street also closes out the slate of projects identified for construction via the $30 million 2011 General Obligation Bond. You can read a little more about the ribbon cutting and the GO Bond here. Urban Renewal Advisory Board Seeks Builder Rep. The Bend Urban Renewal Advisory Board has reopened their search for building stakeholders to serve on the committee that will spend the next couple of years working through an urban renewal feasibility study. If you know any builders with expertise in mixed use or multifamily development please point them in the direction of the application, available here. Applications will be accepted through 5 pm on October 31st. Attachments: Council Schedule 101818 Licensing Memo CFS Sumary 2018 PlanteMoran LEAP Status Report DAQ Drive Test Results Bend Area Bend drive testing report
Print Date: 10/19/2018
Date City Council / BURA Schedule Agenda Material Due Dates
(Legal/Finance) Final
November 7 Work Session
Schedule Requests o Separate check for Parks' SDCs (Councilor
Campbell) o SDCs for transit (Councilor Campbell) o Childcare SDCs (Councilor Russell) o Parkway Access (Councilor Russell) o Census litigation (Councilor Boddie)
Community Survey 2018
Financial Update (45 minutes)
Septic to Sewer Regular Meeting
Two five-year Enterprise Zone applications (Lonza and Five Talent)
SEI Phase I Extension Post Evaluation Report
Empire Corridor Improvements - Progressive Design Build contract amendment
Empire Corridor Improvements - Owners Rep/ Construction Mgmt. Contract
Plante Moran contract amendment
SEAPAC appointments
Residential Meter Box Upgrade – Phase 8 contract
The Pines Sewer Lift Station Asset Transfer Agreement
Septic to Sewer direction for 12/5
Snow removal contracts BURA
Budget adjustment for BURA
November 21 No Meeting
December 5 Work Session
Schedule Requests
Downtown Parking permit fees and zones
Citywide Parking Study, restaurant analysis results
Juniper Ridge Follow-up
Septic to Sewer Regular Meeting
Mid-Year Budget Adjustments
Print Date: 10/19/2018
Investment policy updates
Fiscal Policies
Update to the FTE schedule
Intent to Reimburse Resolution
Plastic Bag Ordinance
Approval of a construction contract for the Murphy Corridor Improvements Project
Pacific Power Franchise Agreement
Phase 2 Ameresco contract
Septic to Sewer
Duplex/triplex public hearing
CDBG Annual Action Plan amendments
Change of Use for a CDBG property
NSP Funds
Follow-up on Galveston
Approval of a revised local agency agreement with ODOT
Parking district change first reading
Declaration of the vote BURA
Committee appointments
December 19 Executive Session
CM Review Work Session
TID and Tumalo Creek Update Regular Meeting
Plastic Bag second reading
Neff & Purcell Design contract
Second reading Pacific Power Franchise Agreement
Second reading Duplex/triplex ordinance
North interceptor early work
BEDAB Strategic Plan
Parking district change second reading
Work Session future topics to be scheduled
Quarterly Council- Board/Commission check-ins (2nd meeting January, April, July, October)
Town Gown Committee Discussion (Jon)
Opportunity Zones
BURA scope of work for Feasibility Study (January)
Airport Master Plan kick off (2019)
Mural Sign Code (2019)
Community Survey Results (January 2019)
2019 Legislative Priorities to the Council agenda schedule- TBD
Regular Agenda future topics to be scheduled
Print Date: 10/19/2018
Public hearing on vacation of Glenwood & Alden
DEQ loan amendment(s)
Gateway North Master Plan, Zone Change and TSP amendment PZ 16-0333
Franchise agreement with a new telecommunications provider
Approval of a CMGC exemption for the Solids Handling Improvement Project
INTERNAL MEMO
______________________________________________________________________
TO: ERIC KING, CITY MANAGER
FROM: LORELEI WILLIAMS, LICENSING PROGRAM MANAGER
DATE: 10/18/2018
RE: LICENSING PROGRAM DATA
A more comprehensive report will be provided to City Council through the City
Manager’s Memo in December of 2018 with status updates for the Licensing Program.
Provided in this memo is a high-level view of the current program data and news of
note. Current programs and their data located in the Licensing Program within the
Community Development Department (CDD) are as follows:
Program # issued in 2017 # issued & pending
in 2018 News of Note
Liquor License
Endorsements
Regular: 47
Special Event: 297
TCOs: 18
Regular: 40
Special Event: 307
TCOs: 3
Working with OLCC staff continually to
improve application processes,
communications and information online.
Noise Variance
Permits 39 20
Fewer complaints received in 2018 than
in previous years. Trending toward
fewer issuances, too.
Marijuana
Business
Operating
Licenses
Producers: 4
Wholesalers: 3
Processors: 4
Retailers: 18
Laboratories: 0
Producers: 11
Wholesalers: 8
Processors: 9
Retailers: 9
Laboratories: 2
Building Safety permitting continues to
be the highest hurdle for licensees.
Once permitted & licensed, businesses
maintain compliance.
2
Program # issued in 2017 # issued & pending
in 2018 News of Note
Short Term
Rental
Operating
Permits &
Licenses
Whole House: 58
Room: 15
Infrequent: 2
Room &
Infrequent: 16
Whole House: 86
Room: 11
Infrequent: 1
Room & Infrequent: 14
Exempt: 60
Grandfathered whole-house
permits (transferable) lessen
each year with 34 becoming
void in 2018.
Whole-house rental activity
remains popular, but is spread
out due to the 250 ft. density
buffer.
Total whole house rental
licenses are at ~760 & other
uses are at ~90, including
exempted properties in 2018.
Excepting exempt properties,
there were ~574 short term
rentals in 2016, ~675 in 2017
and now the ~760.
City staff are conducting internal
audits of STR & TRT data as
well as budgeting for 3rd party
audit resources in 2019.
Sidewalk Café
Permits 34 39
No news to-date. Continuing to improve
compliance for businesses placing
seating on public right of way.
Sidewalk
Vendor
Permits
9 7
New locations have been added to the
program downtown and undesirable
locations have been removed for the
2019 program year.
Special Event
Permits 30 29
Coordination takes place regularly
between OMD, BPRD, County, DBBA
quarterly and event organizers twice
annually.
3
Program # issued in 2017 # issued & pending
in 2018 News of Note
Vehicle for
Hire Operating
Licenses
4 12
Taxi companies to be audited with the
inception of new software. Currently
auditing TNCs (Uber & Lyft) annually
each fall.
Program information is available online at www.bendoregon.gov/licensing. Each
program process is illustrated through an infographic in order to educate the public on
what is required to obtain a license or permit and also provides general information
regarding the supporting Bend Code language and enforcement models. These
programs are currently being shepherded through the LEAP IIPA software and
business-process improvement project. The new licensing and permitting software, City
View, will be available to the public in middle to late 2019.
Program policy updates will be presented to City Council in late 2018 – early 2019 for
housekeeping purposes. These proposed changes will ensure that the programs will be
able to run successfully through the new software and business-process improvements
of City View. Any policy proposals by City staff beyond these housekeeping items will
be postponed until City View implementation has been completed, barring any
emergencies.
Licensing Program staff are also the Communications Liaisons for CDD and will be
assisting with community outreach and online education efforts throughout these
software and process changes. Please contact me with any questions, concerns or
requests for more information.
Sincerely,
Lorelei Williams, Licensing Program Manager
CDD | Development Services Division
[email protected] | (541) 323-8565
8,989 , 11%
33,152 , 42%
37,131 , 47%
2018 CALLS FOR SERVICE YTD
BY SOURCE
E911
Non-Emergency
Officer Initiated
79,272
8,792
8,989
33,323
33,152
28,900
37,131
P REV YTD
YTD
CALLS YTD 2017 VS 2018 BY SOURCE
E911 Non-Emergency Officer Initiated
Data Included through: 10/18/2018
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Total Calls by MonthTotal Calls by MonthTotal Calls by MonthTotal Calls by Month2016 2017 2018
15,340
17,161
23,320
14,936
6,762
1,753
All Calls YTD by Patrol District
1
2
3
4
5
Other
All data subject to change.
71,015
79,272 +2.2% -0.5% +28.5%
7
5
6
4
Downtown
Park
Non-Transient Transient
840 799
609 597
1,449 1,396
PREV YTD YTD
MENTAL HEALTH AND SUICIDAL SUBJECT
CALLS
AMI Suicidal -3.7%Percent Change:
1,163 ,
70%
503 ,
30%
2018 YTD Alarm Calls
Cleared False
Cleared Other
1,666 Total Alarm Calls YTD
EXCLUSIONS ISSUED 2015
STOLEN BICYCLE REPORTS
122 107
Previous YTD YTD
9
13
*Includes Bait Bike Arrests, Does not represent number of bicycles stolen YTD
POLICE OFFICER CIVIL HOLD REPORTS
146 207
Previous YTD YTD
41.8% -12.3%
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
VEHICLE ACCIDENTS AND HIT & RUNS BY MONTH AND YEAR
2016 2017 2018
**21 Bait Bike Reports
-3.4%VS PYTD:
-3.6%False Alarms VS PYTD:
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
DISPATCHED CALLS YTD BY DAY OF WEEK
E911 Non-Emergency Officer Initiated Total Calls
2,3
99
8,3
01
9,2
38
6,8
36
5,5
86
8,8
10
8,6
72
5,6
94
9,6
00
2,7
72
1,1
26
1,9
61
2,9
57
10
,23
4
10
,56
0
7,2
50
5,7
63
9,0
11
9,1
19
6,0
54
10
,70
3
3,5
73
1,5
13
2,5
18
DISPATCHED CALLS BY CALL LENGTH
PYTD
YTD
DAYS MIDS NIGHTS
1963
15731376
1106845
570
914
2511
3779
41224280
45954820
5402
5733 5700
5082
3945
3321 3410
4075 4108
3470
2496
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
DISPATCHED CALLS YTD BY HOUR OF DAY E911
Non-Emergency
Officer Initiated
Total Calls
LEAP Implementation Project Status Report
Reporting Period September 2018
Preparer Plante Moran
Page | 1 of 9
Project Description
This project provides an integrated enterprise system that will support city staff in the delivery of government services and activities, take advantage of best practices, and significantly improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the City’s customer service and business processes.
Key Project Contacts Status Summary
City of Bend Project Team
Overall Project Status
Project Sponsor Eric King Scope / Change Orders
Project Manager Denise Wallace Schedule / Project Timeline
Phase 1 Core Financials
Functional Lead
Brooks Slyter
Budget
Phase 2 Human Resource/Payroll Functional Lead
Shannon Williams Quality
Phase 2 Learning Management Functional Lead/Project Manager
Sandra Roberts Resource / Resource Availability
Phase 3 Extended Financials Functional Lead
Kris Trask
IIPA Functional Lead Rachel Ruppel Andrea Wickberg
Court Functional Lead Dori Oliveira
Content Management
Functional Lead/Project Manager
John Powell
Change Management Leads Kevin Riper
Jon Skidmore
Status Key
Tyler Project Team On target; progressing as planned
Regional Implementation Manager
Project Manager
Scott Parks
Tammy Little
Below target; impacting project, Project Management Office (PMO) mitigating
Off target; seriously impacting project, requires escalation beyond Project Management Office (PMO)
Kronos Project Team
Engagement Manager Martha Strittmater Status upgraded since last period
Project Manager / TeleStaff PM Ryan Austill Status same as last period
Workforce Project Manager Matt Williams Status downgraded since last period
CityView Project Team
Project Manager Sheila McQueen
Plante Moran Project Team
Engagement Manager Dennis Bagley
Project Manager Nicole Simpkinson
Court Lead Colleen Bevins
LEAP Implementation Project Status Report
Reporting Period September 2018
Preparer Plante Moran
Page | 2 of 9
Project Dashboard
Status Project / Deliverable Planned Actual
Phase 1 - Core Financials
DED01 Project Kickoff 04/15/15 04/15/15
DED02 Implementation Management Plans 05/26/15 07/28/15
DED03 Project SharePoint Site 04/21/15 03/01/16
DED04 Project Plan / Schedule 01/29/16 03/01/16
DED05 COA Analysis and Spreadsheet 01/16/16 03/01/16
DED06 Business Process Design Recommendation Spreadsheet 08/19/15 01/08/16
DED07 Final Business Process Design Decisions TBD 01/08/16
DED08 Desktop Documents (drafts) 02/16/16 04/12/16
DED09 Decentralized Procedure Documents (finals) 02/16/16 10/14/16
DED10 Data Conversions Analysis and Crosswalks 12/28/15 Oct 20161
DED11 Data Conversion Files 02/29/16 10/26/16
DED12 Data Conversion Control and Error Reports 01/05/17 03/31/17
DED13 Customization / Interface Analysis and Specifications TBD N/A
DED14 Customizations and Interfaces TBD N/A
DED15 Static Environment Test Plan 08/28/15 08/28/15
DED19 Tyler Forms Kit2 12/14/15 05/18/16
DED20 Tyler Forms Proofs 03/17/16 Oct 20163
DED21 Tyler Forms Library Forms (finals) 10/29/16 10/26/16
DED22 Pre-live Checklist 10/17/16 10/31/16
DED23 Change Management Discovery Analysis 06/30/15 06/30/15
DED24 Change Management Plan and Strategy Presentation 06/30/15 06/30/15
DED25 Sustaining and Reinforcing Change N/A 08/30/16
DED26 Change Management Coach Training4 N/A N/A
DED27 Change Management After-Action Review4 N/A N/A
Go-Live 11/17/16 11/01/16
Phase 2 - Tyler Human Resources/Payroll
DED06 Business Process Design Recommendation Spreadsheet 01/22/16 02/23/16
DED07 Final Business Process Design Decisions 01/22/16 01/18/16
DED08 Desktop Documents (drafts) 08/01/16 04/12/16
DED09 Decentralized Procedure Documents (finals) 08/01/17 May 20185
DED10 Data Conversions Analysis and Crosswalks 04/15/17 May 20175
DED11 Data Conversion Files 05/01/17 May 20175
DED12 Data Conversion Control and Error Reports TBD May 20185
DED13 Customization / Interface Analysis and Specifications TBD 02/07/175
DED14 Customizations and Interfaces 12/16/16 02/07/175
DED15 Static Environment Test Plan 11/20/15 01/07/16
DED19 Tyler Forms Kit2 04/15/17 Nov 20175
DED20 Tyler Forms Proofs (for parallels) 05/01/17 Feb 20185
DED21 Tyler Forms Library Forms (finals) 10/11/17 05/25/18
DED22 Pre-live Checklist 10/11/17 10/12/17
1 Completed and approved without formal sign off prior to DED11.
2 DED numbers 16-18 skipped in the agreement.
3 Completed and approved without formal sign off prior to DED21.
4 Removed from the list of required deliverables.
5 Completed and approved without formal sign off.
LEAP Implementation Project Status Report
Reporting Period September 2018
Preparer Plante Moran
Page | 3 of 9
Project Dashboard
Status Project / Deliverable Planned Actual
DED26 Change Management Coach Training4 N/A N/A
DED27 Change Management After-Action Review4 N/A N/A
Go-Live 05/25/18 05/25/18
Phase 2 - Kronos Time and Attendance
Project Kickoff 07/22/15 07/22/15
Workforce Solution Development Workshops Complete 09/09/16 09/09/16
TeleStaff Solution Design Workshops Complete 12/01/16 Dec 20165
Parallel Testing Complete 06/23/17 Feb 20185
Go-Live 05/25/18 05/25/18
Phase 2 - Learning Management
Project Kickoff Dec 2016 Dec 20165
Streets and Utilities (Public Works) Go-Live 04/03/17 04/03/17
City All Go-Live 04/14/17 04/14/17
Police Go-Live Oct 2017 Oct 20175
Phase 3 – Extended Financials
This phase has been cancelled.
Integrated Inspections and Permitting Application (IIPA) Implementation and Configuration6
RFP Release 07/15/15 08/21/15
Solution Selection Approved by City Manager 06/08/16 06/08/16
Recommended Contract Submitted to City Council for Consideration 12/07/16 12/21/16
Implementation Project Kickoff Feb 2018 Feb 2018
Go-Live (estimated) Summer 2019
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) Assessment
Project Kickoff 12/05/16 12/05/16
Assessment Interviews 12/09/16 12/09/19
Draft Findings and Opportunities Summary 02/10/17 02/15/17
EAM Draft Assessment Report 02/23/17 02/23/17
EAM Awareness and Visioning Sessions 04/28/17 04/26/17
Implementation Strategy and Final Assessment Report 03/31/17 04/24/17
Court Management System Selection and Implementation
Final Specifications Aug 2018
RFP Release (estimated) Nov 2018
Solution Selection (estimated) Jan 2018
Project Kickoff (estimated) May 2018
Go-Live (estimated) TBD
Content Management
This project has been closed. 4 Removed from the list of required deliverables.
5 Completed and approved without formal sign off.
6 Other milestone activities and deliverables to be determined based on final detailed project plan.
LEAP Implementation Project Status Report
Reporting Period September 2018
Preparer Plante Moran
Page | 4 of 9
General Period Update
Accomplishments This Month
• Continuing Phase 2 – Human Resources/Payroll 90-day post go-live update/reviews to solicit feedback, answer questions, and address concerns.
• Working with CityView to finalize detailed IIPA project scope and budget.
• Preparing request for proposals (RFP) for a court management system for publication, now scheduled for November 1, 2017.
Planned for Next Month
LEAP Program Items
• Continue discussion of existing ERP governance and support model.
Phase 1 – Core Financials (Tyler)
• None; this project is now closed.
Phase 2 – Human Resources/Payroll (Tyler/Kronos)
• Complete 90-day post go-live updates/reviews in October to solicit feedback, answer questions, and address concerns.
• Resolve open service issues with Kronos.
Phase 2 – Learning Management (TargetSolutions)
• None; this project is now closed.
Phase 3 – Extended Financials
• None; this project is now closed.
Integrated Inspections and Permitting Application (IIPA) Implementation and Configuration (CityView)
• Finalize detailed project scope and budget.
Enterprise Asset Management Assessment
• No activities planned.
Court Management System Selection and Implementation
• Publish RFP (estimated November 1, 2018).
Content Management
• None; this project is now closed.
Change Management
• Continue reviewing change management activities regularly at EST meetings.
LEAP Implementation Project Status Report
Reporting Period September 2018
Preparer Plante Moran
Page | 5 of 9
Risks and Issues
1. As the City begins to make policy and business process decisions, the extent of business process change and the impacts of that change are becoming more apparent.
This risk remains open, but was reduced in June 2018. The City’s project management team continues to actively track open issues in a centralized Issues, Actions, and Decision Log, and escalate issues to the Executive Steering Team (EST) regularly for decision or initial discussion as appropriate. . The EST approved the IIPA Change Management Plan prepared by the LEAP project’s Change Management Leads and project team. However, this plan encompasses the IIPA project only (not the full scope of the LEAP program). Additionally, some on the LEAP project team express concern regarding the capacity of those assigned key responsibilities to effectively perform these activities in addition to their LEAP duties as well as daily job responsibilities. The EST continues to review change management activities regularly at EST meetings.
2. The City has identified several functional issues with the Tyler Accounts Receivable/General Billing module that seem to represent a lack of compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
This risk remains open and continues to be escalated. The City identified several functional issues that do not appear to be in GAAP compliance, including: 1) the processing of loans and loan payments; 2) allocation of charge codes to multiple revenue accounts; 3) the processing deposits and prepaid amounts; and 4) the application of a deposit to a charge and booking to general ledger accounts. These issue were first raised by the City’s Project Management Office in January 2017. After a lack of adequate response from Tyler’s project team, this issue was escalated to the Executive Steering Team in March 2017. Tyler requested further clarification and examples of non-compliance on April 12, 2017, and the City provided that clarification on April 17. Tyler directed the City to submit these issues as an enhancement request. Since then, the City has logged more than 20 additional functional issues also related to the Tyler AR/GB module and submitted a formal discrepancy report to Tyler on July 7, 2017. On August 1, 2017 the City met with Tyler’s Project Manager, Regional Implementation Manager, and Vice President, ERP & School Division to review the 10 issues identified in this report. Tyler asserted that the AR/GB module functions as designed (originally for a limited functional scope in response to a single customer request). Tyler did identify a few issues as “bugs” that can be fixed; however, recommended its Utility Billing module to meet the loan functionality requirements of the City. The City conducted software demonstrations of Tyler’s Utility Billing module in July 2017. The City met a second time in December 2017 to conduct additional testing based on a future product release. The City met most recently with Tyler for a demonstration of its Utility Billing module in August 2018. Shortly following this demonstration, the City’s project manager communicated to Tyler’s project manager via email that the City requires additional time to review Tyler’s UB Assessment module as they were informed it would require a modification to meet GAAP and GASB requirements. The City has not yet received additional details regarding these modifications or a date for a more in depth demonstration. At this time, the City is continuing to evaluate options, including Tyler Utility Billing for loans billing, CityView for general billing, and other third party solutions. The City continues to wait to hear from Tyler regarding how it will meet requirements for the City.
3. Implementation staff report increasing resource constraints.
This risk remains open from December 2016, but was reduced in June 2018. Operational departments continue to report resource constraints. Competing project demands include Integrated Inspections and Permitting Application (IIPA) system implementation and Courts Management System selection and implementation, among others. In January, the LEAP Project Assistant also left the City. In April 2018 the City hired a new Project Assistant to fill the vacant position. In May 2018, the City Manager approved two Project Coordinator and additional backfill positions for the project. Postings for these two coordinator positions closed on September 6. The City received 20 applications and will begin
LEAP Implementation Project Status Report
Reporting Period September 2018
Preparer Plante Moran
Page | 6 of 9
interviews in October. City Council approved several additional positions of limited-term equivalent (LTE) to support Community Development, Finance, and Information Technology.
4. The Executive Steering Team is reassessing its core purpose and operating principles.
Originally opened in February 2018, this risk is now closed. In interviews with Plante Moran as early as December 2017, Executive Steering Team (EST) members expressed differing opinions regarding the core purpose of the team. Some felt that the team should be working as an oversight body, focused on overall performance metrics as well as project scope, schedule, and budget. Others were comfortable with the EST working as an active decision-making body, focused on policy and process issues raised by the project management team (i.e., project sponsor, project manager, functional and technical leads, and change management leads). The City invited Plante Moran to facilitate a discussion on February 28 to refine or validate the core purpose and operating principles of the EST. Plante Moran presented the discussion notes and associated recommendations in early March 2018 and the EST tentatively agreed to updates to the LEAP project charter in July 2018. While it was originally anticipated that the EST would formally approve the changes in August 2018, the EST approved these changes on September 12.
5. While IT has an ERP support model in place, there is no formal staffing plan for transitioning business support for Human Resources (HR)/Payroll. The City lacks a formal post go live support plan for Human Resources/Payroll.
This risk remains open from March 2018, but was reduced in August 2018. Existing HR project staff members have a strong understanding of the HR/Payroll solutions. However, Tyler Munis, Kronos TeleStaff, and Kronos Timekeeper as well as Volunteer 2 (recently implemented to retire Police tools) all require significant business support. Since project staff members transitioned back to daily operations, they no longer have capacity to remain the primary point of support for these applications. The City transitioned someone from the City Manager’s Office to help support the HR/Payroll systems. While the project management team originally anticipated bringing this to the EST in August for formal closure, it is now expected to be presented for closure in October.
LEAP Implementation Project Status Report
Reporting Period September 2018
Preparer Plante Moran
Page | 7 of 9
Functional Team Period Updates
Phase 1 Core Financials Functional Team Brooks Slyter
Tasks Completed This Period
• None; this project is now closed.
Tasks Planned For This Period But Not Completed
• None.
Tasks Planned For Next Period
• None.
Phase 2 Human Resources/Payroll Functional Team Shannon Williams
Tasks Completed This Period
• Continuing 90-day post go-live updates/reviews to solicit feedback, answer questions, and address concerns.
• Continuing to work with Kronos to resolve open service issues.
Tasks Planned For This Period But Not Completed
• None.
Tasks Planned For Next Period
• Complete 90-day post go-live updates/reviews in October to solicit feedback, answer questions, and address concerns.
• Resolve open service issues with Kronos.
Phase 2 Learning Management Functional Team Sandra Roberts
Tasks Completed This Period
• None; this project is now closed.
Tasks Planned For This Period But Not Completed
• None.
Tasks Planned For Next Period
• None.
LEAP Implementation Project Status Report
Reporting Period September 2018
Preparer Plante Moran
Page | 8 of 9
Phase 3 Extended Financials Functional Team Kris Trask
Tasks Completed This Period
• None; this project is now closed.
Tasks Planned For This Period But Not Completed
• None.
Tasks Planned For Next Period
• None.
Integrated Inspections and Permitting Functional Team Rachel Ruppel/Andrea Wickberg
Tasks Completed This Period
• Working with CityView to finalize project scope and budget.
Tasks Planned For This Period But Not Completed
• Finalize detailed project scope and budget (in progress).
• Complete configuration for property integration, planning, and code enforcement (on hold pending finalized scope and budget).
Tasks Planned For Next Period
• Finalize detailed project scope and budget.
Enterprise Asset Management Functional Team TBD
Tasks Completed This Period
• None.
Tasks Planned For This Period But Not Completed
• None.
Tasks Planned For Next Period
• None.
LEAP Implementation Project Status Report
Reporting Period September 2018
Preparer Plante Moran
Page | 9 of 9
Court Functional Team Dori Oliveira
Tasks Completed This Period
• Preparing request for proposals (RFP) for publication, now scheduled for November 1, 2017.
Tasks Planned For This Period But Not Completed
• Publish the RFP (in progress).
Tasks Planned For Next Period
• Complete preparation of RFP for publication.
Content Management Functional Team John Powell
Tasks Completed This Period
• None; this project is now closed.
Tasks Planned For This Period But Not Completed
• None.
Tasks Planned For Next Period
• None.
DAQ Testing Results - Bend AreaMobile Radio - Dispatch Team
0 1 2 3 4Miles
[10/17/2018
DAQ Score5.04.54.03.43.02.01.0City Limits
DAQ Testing Results - Bend AreaMobile Radio - Drive Team
0 1 2 3 4Miles
[10/17/2018
DAQ Score5.04.54.03.43.02.01.0City Limits
3.3
3.3
3.3
DAQ Testing Results - Bend AreaPortable Radio - Dispatch Team
0 1 2 3 4Miles
[10/17/2018
DAQ Score5.04.54.03.43.02.01.0City Limits
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.1
3.33.0
DAQ Testing Results - Bend AreaPortable Radio - Drive Team
0 1 2 3 4Miles
[10/17/2018
DAQ Score5.04.54.03.43.02.01.0City Limits
3929 184th Place SE Joe Blaschka, Jr., P.E.
Bothell, WA 98012-8827 Voice: 425●489●0125 Fax: 425●488●3952 E-mail: [email protected]
October 10, 2018
To: Sara Crosswhite, Interim Director Deschutes County 9-1-1
From: Joe Blaschka Jr, PE
Subject: City of Bend Drive Testing Results
Drive testing the Deschutes County 9-1-1 (DC911) 800 MHz trunked radio system to measure Delivered Audio Quality (DAQ) levels was performed by DC911, Bend Police Department, and Bend Fire Department personnel on October 3rd and 4th, 2018. This test covered the City of Bend area. The drive test procedure was defined in the ADCOMM supplied City of Bend Drive Testing Document.
The Drive Testing Document outlined the technical and operational parameters for the test. The test personnel based the test locations on a city of Bend map with the area divided up into equal squares. Test transmissions were made from locations in each square randomly chosen by the drive team.
At each location transmissions were made by the mobile team using a Motorola mobile radio, a Motorola portable radio, and a Harris portable radio. The test was done using standard Harvard sentences. The test personnel located at DC911 listened and evaluated each of the transmissions. Then the dispatch test staff made transmissions to the mobile unit and the mobile unit evaluated the transmissions. The transmissions were evaluated on a DAQ scale of 1 through 5.
The information was entered into forms in the field and was then transferred to a spreadsheet where the average value for each type of transmission, mobile and portable, was determined. The test was marked “Safety” to designate Public Safety Grade if the average value was 3.4 or above. The test was marked “Service” to designate Public Service Grade if the average value was 3.3 or below. Note the system was originally designed to provide a 3.0 or greater.
There were a total of 83 dispatch transmissions evaluated on the “mobile” radios receive side with 100% testing 3.4 DAQ or above. The transmissions received by the “portable” radios averaged 93.6% DAQ 3.4 or above. A total of 5 tests fell between the service grade and safety grade, 3 of those 5 tested at 3.3 DAQ, the others 3.0 DAQ and 3.1 DAQ respectively
There were a total of 83 “mobile” transmissions evaluated on the dispatch receive side with 100% testing at 3.4 DAQ or above. The transmissions received be the “portable” radios averaged 96.4% DAQ or above. A total of 3 tests fell between the service grade and safety grade, all 3 testing at 3.3 DAQ. It should be noted that the 3 scores of 3.3 DAQ were at the beginning of the testing process.
Coverage Test for Deschutes County (DC911) Page # of
Target DAQ 3.4
Base to Mobile Date
Mobile to Base
Team Mobile Receive ResultsFire Evaluator
Law Evaluator
Dispatch Evaluator
Transmit Side Received Signal Level
Service Area Test Tile Number Remarks DAQ - Disp DAQ - FD DAQ - PD MDAQ-Avg PDAQ - Avg
5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
16 12 30 - FD 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.7
16 12 30 - PD 5.0 3.0 5.0
5.0 5.0 4.0 4.7
3.0 3.4 3.0 3.4
3.0 5.0 3.0
5.0 4.0 5.0 4.7
4.0 4.0 3.4 3.9
4.0 4.0 4.0
5.0 4.0 5.0 4.7
3.4 4.0 4.0 3.9
4.0 4.0 4.0
4.5 3.4 4.5 4.1
4.0 4.0 4.0 3.8
4.0 3.0 4.0
4.5 4.0 4.5 4.3
4.0 3.0 4.0 3.7
3.0 4.0 4.0
4.5 4.0 5.0 4.5
4.0 4.0 4.0 3.8
4.0 3.0 4.0
4.5 4.0 5.0 4.5
4.0 3.4 4.0 3.9
4.0 4.0 4.0
5.0 4.5 4.0 4.5
17 12 06 - FD 4.5 4.5 3.4 3.9
17 12 06 - PD 4.0 4.0 3.0
17 12 05 - DC911 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 05 - FD 3.4 4.0 4.0 3.7
17 12 05 - PD 4.0 3.0 4.0
16 12 32 - DC911 Check OID/Glacier View 3.0 4.5 4.5 4.0
16 12 32 - FD 2.0 4.0 4.0 3.0
16 12 32 - PD Mobile - cut in out 1.0 3.0 4.0
17 12 08 - DC911 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.2
17 12 08 - FD 4.0 5.0 4.5 4.3
17 12 08 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 17 - DC911 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.7
Safety
Service
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
16 12 26 - FD
16 12 26 - PD
16 12 30 - DC911 Clear
16 12 26 - DC911
Saf/Ser
Safety
Safety
40/1 - asked to repeat; port ok; FD port did not understand
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
16 12 27 - FD
16 12 27 - PD
16 12 28 - FD
16 12 28 - PD
16 12 29 - FD
16 12 28 - DC911
16 12 25 - DC911 McGrath/Morrill Bend SC/Powell/Pine
16 12 36 - DC911
16 12 27 - DC911
16 12 25 - FD
16 12 25 - PD
16 12 36 - FD
16 12 36 - PD
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
17 12 06 - DC911
16 12 31 - FD
16 12 31 - PD
Bonk on first try
did not receive first trans
Mobile - no anwer first try bonk
Repeat and bonk
Repeat
16 12 29 - DC911 Repeat
16 12 31 - DC911
16 12 29 - PD
Safety
Page 1 of 6
17 12 17 - FD 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.5
17 12 17 - PD 4.0 4.0 3.0
17 12 04 - DC911 4.5 4.0 3.4 4.0
17 12 04 - FD 4.5 5.0 2.4 3.8
17 12 04 - PD 4.0 4.0 3.0
17 12 09 - DC911 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.8
17 12 09 - FD 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.3
17 12 09 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 03 - DC911 Long tone 1st 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.2
17 12 03 - FD Bonk 4.5 4.0 3.4 3.8
17 12 03 - PD Widi Creek 4.0 4.0 3.0
16 12 34 - DC911 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
16 12 34 - FD 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.3
16 12 34 - PD Mobile - asked me to repeat 3.0 4.0 3.0
16 12 33 - DC911 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.2
16 12 33 - FD 4.0 4.0 3.4 3.4
16 12 33 - PD 3.0 4.0 2.0
16 12 35 - DC911 4.0 3.4 3.4 3.6
16 12 35 - FD 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
16 12 35 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 02 - DC911 3.4 3.4 4.0 3.6
17 12 02 - FD 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.8
17 12 02 - PD 4.0 4.0 3.0
17 12 11 - DC911 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.2
17 12 11 - FD 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 11 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 14 - DC911 4.0 4.3 4.0 4.1
17 12 14 - FD 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 14 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 13 - DC911 3.4 4.0 3.0 3.5
17 12 13 - FD 4.0 4.0 3.4 3.1
17 12 13 - PD could not understand; FP quiet - then really loud Disp Mic 3.0 2.0 2.0
17 12 12 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
17 12 12 - FD 4.0 4.5 4.0 3.8
17 12 12 - PD 4.0 3.0 3.0
17 12 23 - DC911 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.3
17 12 23 - FD 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.1
17 12 23 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 24 - DC911 3.4 4.0 4.0 3.8
17 12 24 - FD 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.5
17 12 24 - PD 3.0 4.0 3.0
17 12 25 - DC911 911 answered twice 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
17 12 25 - FD 2 outputs to Bend Dispatch 4.5 4.5 4.0 3.3
17 12 25 - PD Mobile - couldn't hear dispatch first trans; P broken 1.0 4.0 2.0
17 12 26 - DC911 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.3
17 12 26 - FD 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.2
17 12 26 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 15 - DC911 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Service
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Service
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Page 2 of 6
17 12 15 - FD 4.0 5.0 4.5 4.1
17 12 15 - PD 3.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 10 - DC911 4.4 4.6 4.0 4.3
17 12 10 - FD 3.4 4.5 4.0 3.8
17 12 10 - PD 3.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 07 - DC911 3.4 4.5 3.4 3.8
17 12 07 - FD 3.4 4.0 3.4 3.6
17 12 07 - PD 4.0 4.0 3.0
17 12 20 - DC911 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 20 - FD 3.4 4.5 4.0 4.0
17 12 20 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 19 - DC911 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.2
17 12 19 - FD 3.4 4.5 3.4 3.7
17 12 19 - PD 4.0 4.0 3.0
17 12 18 - DC911 Not broken, just digital 3.8 4.0 3.4 3.7
17 12 18 - FD 2.0 4.0 3.4 3.4
17 12 18 - PD 3.0 4.0 4.0
17 11 24 - DC911 3.4 4.0 3.4 3.6
17 11 24 - FD 3.0 4.5 3.4 3.5
17 11 24 - PD 3.0 4.0 3.0
17 11 25 - DC911 4.5 4.0 4.3 4.3
17 11 25 - FD 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.3
17 11 25 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 11 26 - DC911 4.0 4.0 3.4 3.8
17 11 26 - FD 2.0 4.0 4.0 3.3
17 11 26 - PD 3.0 4.0 3.0
17 11 23 - DC911 Sheridan Park Bottom 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 11 23 - FD 4.0 4.0 3.4 3.9
17 11 23 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 11 14 - DC911 Saddleback West 4.5 3.4 3.4 3.8
17 11 14 - FD 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0
17 11 14 - PD 4.0 4.0 3.0
17 11 13 - DC911 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.3
17 11 13 - FD 3.0 4.5 4.5 3.8
17 11 13 - PD 3.0 4.0 4.0
17 11 36 - DC911 NW Crossing 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
17 11 36 - FD 4.5 4.5 3.4 3.9
17 11 36 - PD 4.0 4.0 3.0
17 11 35 - DC911 Miller Elem 4.0 4.0 3.4 3.8
17 11 35 - FD 3.4 4.0 3.4 3.5
17 11 35 - PD 3.0 4.0 3.0
18 11 02 - DC911 Macalpine 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
18 11 02 - FD 4.5 4.5 4.0 3.8
18 11 02 - PD 3.0 4.0 3.0
18 11 01 - DC911 Broken Top 3.4 4.0 3.4 3.6
18 11 01 - FD 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0
18 11 01 - PD 4.0 4.0 3.0
18 11 12 - DC911 Tetherow 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.7
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Service
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Page 3 of 6
18 11 12 - FD 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.1
18 11 12 - PD 4.0 4.0 3.0
18 11 11 - DC911 Tetherow 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.3
18 11 11 - FD 3.4 4.5 4.0 4.0
18 11 11 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 11 14 - DC911 Widgi Creek 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 11 14 - FD 3.4 4.0 3.4 3.6
18 11 14 - PD 4.0 4.0 3.0
18 11 22 - DC911 7th Mountain 3.4 4.0 3.4 3.6
18 11 22 - FD 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5
18 11 22 - PD 3.0 3.0 3.0
18 11 13 - DC911 Mammoth Drive 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
18 11 13 - FD 4.0 4.5 3.4 4.0
18 11 13 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 12 07 - DC911 3.4 4.5 4.0 4.0
18 12 07 - FD 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7
18 12 07 - PD 3.0 4.0 3.0
18 12 06 - DC911 West Sub 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.2
18 12 06 - FD 4.0 4.0 3.4 3.9
18 12 06 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 31 - DC911 Columbia 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.3
17 12 31 - FD 3.4 4.0 4.0 3.7
17 12 31 - PD 3.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 32 - DC911 Kansas 4.0 3.4 3.4 3.6
17 12 32 - FD 3.4 4.0 4.0 3.7
17 12 32 - PD 4.0 3.0 4.0
17 12 29 - DC911 1st Rapids 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.2
17 12 29 - FD 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0
17 12 29 - PD 3.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 30 - DC911 Hillside Park 3.4 3.4 4.0 3.6
17 12 30 - FD 4.0 4.5 4.0 3.8
17 12 30 - PD 3.0 4.0 3.0
17 12 28 - DC911 Revere and 6th 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.3
17 12 28 - FD 4.0 4.0 4.5 3.8
17 12 28 - PD 3.0 4.0 3.0
17 12 27 - DC911 Almoody Park 4.0 3.4 4.0 3.8
17 12 27 - FD 3.4 4.0 3.4 3.6
17 12 27 - PD 4.0 4.0 3.0
17 12 22 - DC911 Butler / Purcell 4.0 3.4 4.0 3.8
17 12 22 - FD 3.4 4.0 3.4 3.5
17 12 22 - PD 3.0 4.0 3.0
17 12 21 - DC911 Empire / Plateau 3.4 4.0 3.4 3.6
17 12 21 - FD 3.4 4.0 3.4 3.3
17 12 21 - PD 3.0 3.0 3.0
17 12 16 - DC911 Morningstar / Ridgefield 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.2
17 12 16 - FD 4.0 4.0 3.4 3.9
17 12 16 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 33 - DC911 8th / Greenwood 3.4 4.0 4.5 4.0
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Service
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Page 4 of 6
17 12 33 - FD 3.4 4.0 4.0 3.9
17 12 33 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 34 - DC911 Safeway East 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.2
17 12 34 - FD 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.1
17 12 34 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 35 - DC911 Forum / Dalton 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.2
17 12 35 - FD 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.3
17 12 35 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 36 - DC911 3.4 4.0 4.0 3.8
17 12 36 - FD 3.4 4.0 4.0 3.7
17 12 36 - PD 3.0 4.0 4.0
18 12 01 - DC911 3.4 4.0 3.4 3.6
18 12 01 - FD 4.0 4.0 3.4 3.7
18 12 01 - PD 4.0 4.0 3.0
18 12 02 - DC911 4.0 4.0 3.4 3.8
18 12 02 - FD 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7
18 12 02 - PD 4.0 3.0 3.0
18 12 03 - DC911 Cessna 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 12 03 - FD 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.1
18 12 03 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 12 04 - DC911 9th / Wilson 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.3
18 12 04 - FD 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 12 04 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 12 10 - DC911 Desert Woods 3.4 4.5 4.5 4.1
18 12 10 - FD 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 12 10 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 12 15 - DC911 Bridges 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.7
18 12 15 - FD 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 12 15 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 12 16 - DC911 61000 Brosterhous 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.8
18 12 16 - FD 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.1
18 12 16 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 12 09 - DC911 Foxborough 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.3
18 12 09 - FD 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 12 09 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 12 21 - DC911 Knott / Country Club 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
18 12 21 - FD 4.0 4.0 3.4 3.9
18 12 21 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 12 28 - DC911 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.2
18 12 28 - FD 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.8
18 12 28 - PD 4.0 3.0 4.0
18 12 20 - DC911 Mountain High 4.0 4.0 3.4 3.8
18 12 20 - FD 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 12 20 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 12 29 - DC911 Lost Tracks 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.2
18 12 29 - FD 4.0 4.0 3.4 3.9
18 12 29 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 12 30 - DC911 Riverwoods Store 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Page 5 of 6
18 12 30 - FD 3.4 4.0 4.0 3.9
18 12 30 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 11 25 - DC911 DRW 4.0 4.0 3.4 3.8
18 11 25 - FD 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 11 25 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 11 36 - DC911 DRW 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 11 36 - FD 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.2
18 11 36 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 11 26 - DC911 DRW 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 26 - FD 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.1
18 11 26 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 11 27 - DC911 DRW 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.3
18 11 27 - FD 3.4 3.4 4.0 3.6
18 11 27 - PD 4.0 3.0 4.0
18 11 23 - DC911 DRW 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 23 - FD 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.1
18 11 23 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 11 24 - DC911 Baker / Brookswood 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 24 - FD 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.2
18 11 24 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Page 6 of 6
Coverage Test for Deschutes County (DC911) Page # of
Target DAQ 3.4
Base to Mobile Date
Mobile to Base
Team Dispatch Receive ResultsFire Evaluator
Law Evaluator
Dispatch Evaluator
Service Area Test Tile Number Remarks DAQ - Disp DAQ - FD DAQ - PD MDAQ - Avg PDAQ - Avg
3.0 4.5 4.5 4.0
16 12 30 - FD 3.0 4.5 4.5 3.3
16 12 30 - PD 2.0 3.0 3.0
4.0 4.5 4.5 4.3
3.5 4.5 4.5 3.9
2.0 4.5 4.5
4.0 4.0 4.5 4.2
4.5 4.0 4.5 3.3
2.0 2.0 3.0
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
4.5 4.5 4.0 3.6
2.0 3.0 3.4
3.0 4.0 4.0 3.7
3.0 4.5 4.0 3.3
2.0 3.0 3.0
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
4.5 4.0 4.5 3.5
4.0 2.0 2.0
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
4.0 4.0 3.5 3.4
3.0 3.0 3.0
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
4.0 4.5 3.5 3.8
3.4 4.0 3.4
Slight distortion on police 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 06 - FD Good on mobile & fire; okay on police 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
17 12 06 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.0
17 12 05 - DC911 Slight distortion on police & fire 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 05 - FD Okay on mobile, police & fire 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.9
17 12 05 - PD Some distortion on fire 4.5 3.4 4.0
16 12 32 - DC911 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
16 12 32 - FD Good on mobile & fire; okay on police 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.2
16 12 32 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.5
17 12 08 - DC911 Slight distortion on fire 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 08 - FD Okay on mobile & police; good on fire 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.2
17 12 08 - PD 4.5 4.0 4.0
17 12 17 - DC911 Distorted but mostly understandable on mobile & police; distorted but understandable on fire 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 17 - FD Okay on mobile & police; muffled but okay on fire 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.6
17 12 17 - PD Garbled / distorted on mobile, police & fire 3.0 3.4 3.4
17 12 04 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 04 - FD Okay on mobile; muffled on police; good on fire 3.5 4.0 3.0 4.0
17 12 04 - PD Clear on mobile 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 09 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
17 12 09 - FD Not great on mobile; muffled on police; good on fire 3.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Saf/Ser
16 12 30 - DC911 Mobile sounded slightly muffled or distorted Safety
Safety
Mobile difficult to hear & understand; police okay
16 12 26 - DC911 Safety
16 12 26 - FD Good police & fire
16 12 26 - PD Mobile okay but distorted
16 12 25 - DC911 Slight distortion on fire
Unclear mobile, good police & fire Service
Safety
16 12 27 - DC911 Slight distortion on mobile Safety
16 12 25 - FD Clear on mobile & police; muffled on fire
16 12 25 - PD
16 12 36 - DC911 Safety
16 12 36 - FD Good and mobile & police; clear on fire
16 12 36 - PD
Service
Safety
16 12 29 - DC911 Slight distortion on police Safety
16 12 27 - FD Muffled on mobile; police ok; fire good
16 12 27 - PD Muffled on mobile
16 12 28 - DC911 Slight distortion on police & fire Safety
16 12 28 - FD Good on mobile & fire; okay on police
16 12 28 - PD Mobile, police & fire sounded okay
Service
Safety
17 12 06 - DC911
16 12 29 - FD Good on mobile & fire; muffled on police
16 12 29 - PD Muffled on police
16 12 31 - DC911 Slight distortion on mobile & police Safety
16 12 31 - FD Good on mobile; okay on police & fire
16 12 31 - PD Some distortion on mobile & police
Safety
Safety
Page 1 of 5
17 12 09 - PD Clear on mobile 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 03 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 03 - FD Okay on mobile; good on police & fire 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 03 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.5
16 12 34 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
16 12 34 - FD Okay on mobile & police 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0
16 12 34 - PD 4.0 4.5 4.5
16 12 33 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
16 12 33 - FD Good on mobile, police & fire 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.3
16 12 33 - PD Clear on mobile, police & fire 4.5 4.5 4.5
16 12 35 - DC911 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.2
16 12 35 - FD Good on mobile, police & fire 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.3
16 12 35 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 02 - DC911 Slightly distorted on fire 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.3
17 12 02 - FD Great on mobile; muffled on police; good on fire 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.2
17 12 02 - PD Somewhat distorted on mobile, police & fire 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 11 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
17 12 11 - FD Muffled but okay on mobile 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.8
17 12 11 - PD 3.5 4.0 4.0
17 12 14 - DC911 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.3
17 12 14 - FD Muffled on fire 4.5 3.5 4.5 4.3
17 12 14 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 13 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 13 - FD Great on mobile; muffled on police; good on fire 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.3
17 12 13 - PD Clear on mobile 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 12 - DC911 Hard time understanding "disp" on police 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
17 12 12 - FD Good on mobile; muffled on police 4.0 4.5 3.5 4.3
17 12 12 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 23 - DC911 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.3
17 12 23 - FD Good on mobile & police 4.5 4.0 3.5 4.3
17 12 23 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 24 - DC911 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.2
17 12 24 - FD Okay on mobile; muffled on police; unclear on fire 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0
17 12 24 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.0
17 12 25 - DC911 Slightly distorted on mobile & fire 3.4 3.4 4.5 3.8
17 12 25 - FD Ok with broken/unanswered calls on mobile; okay on police & fire 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.6
17 12 25 - PD 4.0 3.4 4.0
17 12 26 - DC911 Slightly distorted on fire 4.5 3.4 4.5 4.1
17 12 26 - FD Good on mobile and & fire; muffled on police 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0
17 12 26 - PD 4.0 4.5 4.0
17 12 15 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 15 - FD Good on mobile & police; okay on fire 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.3
17 12 15 - PD Clear / crisp on mobile 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 10 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 10 - FD Great on mobile & fire; good on police 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.3
17 12 10 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 07 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 07 - FD Muffled on mobile; okay on police; good on fire 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0
17 12 07 - PD Clear on mobile 4.0 4.5 4.0
17 12 20 - DC911 Slight distortion on mobile & police 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.2
17 12 20 - FD Okay on police; good on fire 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.8
17 12 20 - PD Distorted on police 4.5 4.0 3.4
17 12 19 - DC911 Slight distortion on mobile 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.3
17 12 19 - FD Great on mobile, police & fire 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.2
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Page 2 of 5
17 12 19 - PD 4.0 4.0 3.4
17 12 18 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 18 - FD Good on mobile & police; great on fire 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1
17 12 18 - PD 4.0 4.5 4.0
17 11 24 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 11 24 - FD 4.2
17 11 24 - PD Clear on mobile 4.5 4.0 4.0
17 11 25 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 11 25 - FD 4.2
17 11 25 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.5
17 11 26 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 11 26 - FD 4.2
17 11 26 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.5
17 11 23 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 11 23 - FD Good on mobile; great on police; solid on fire 4.0 3.5 4.5 3.9
17 11 23 - PD 4.0 3.4 4.0
17 11 14 - DC911 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.3
17 11 14 - FD Muffled on mobile; good on police; okay on fire 3.0 3.5 4.0 3.5
17 11 14 - PD Somewhat distorted on mobile 3.4 3.4 3.4
17 11 13 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 11 13 - FD Good on mobile, police & fire 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1
17 11 13 - PD 4.0 4.5 4.0
17 11 36 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 11 36 - FD Great on mobile & police 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.3
17 11 36 - PD 4.5 4.0 4.5
17 11 35 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 11 35 - FD Good on mobile, police & fire 4.0 4.0 3.5 3.9
17 11 35 - PD 4.0 4.0 4.0
18 11 02 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 02 - FD Okay on mobile; good on police & fire 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.3
18 11 02 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 01 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 01 - FD 4.1
18 11 01 - PD 4.5 3.4 4.5
18 11 12 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 12 - FD Okay on mobile, police & fire 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.1
18 11 12 - PD 4.5 4.0 4.5
18 11 11 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 11 - FD Great on mobile; slight muffle on police; okay on fire 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.4
18 11 11 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 14 - DC911 Slightly distorted on mobile 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.3
18 11 14 - FD Clear on police & fire 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.3
18 11 14 - PD Clear on mobile 4.0 4.5 4.5
18 11 22 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 22 - FD Okay on mobile; good on police & fire 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.4
18 11 22 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 13 - DC911 Slightly distorted on fire 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.3
18 11 13 - FD Good on mobile; clear on police & fire 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.4
18 11 13 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 07 - DC911 Slightly distorted on police 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
18 12 07 - FD Great on mobile; slight muffle on police; good on fire 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
18 12 07 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.0
18 12 06 - DC911 Slightly distorted on police 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
18 12 06 - FD Good on mobile, police & fire 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.4
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Page 3 of 5
18 12 06 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.0
17 12 31 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 31 - FD Great on mobile, police & fire 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 31 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 32 - DC911 Slightly distorted on mobile 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
17 12 32 - FD 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
17 12 32 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.0
17 12 29 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 29 - FD 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.3
17 12 29 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 30 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 30 - FD Good on mobile & fire; okay on police 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.3
17 12 30 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 28 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 28 - FD Good on police & fire 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.4
17 12 28 - PD Clear on mobile 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 27 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 27 - FD Okay on mobile and police; good on fire 3.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
17 12 27 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 22 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 22 - FD Good on mobile, police & fire 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.3
17 12 22 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 21 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 21 - FD Great on mobile, police & fire 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 21 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 16 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 16 - FD Great on mobile; okay on police 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.4
17 12 16 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 33 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 33 - FD Great on mobile, police & fire 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.3
17 12 33 - PD 4.5 4.0 4.5
17 12 34 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 34 - FD Good on mobile; great on fire 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
17 12 34 - PD 4.5 4.0 4.5
17 12 35 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 35 - FD 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.2
17 12 35 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
17 12 36 - DC911 Slight distortion on police & fire 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.2
17 12 36 - FD 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.2
17 12 36 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 01 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 01 - FD Clear on mobile 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.4
18 12 01 - PD 4.5 4.0 4.5
18 12 02 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 02 - FD Great on mobile; nice on police 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.3
18 12 02 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 03 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 03 - FD Good on mobile 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.4
18 12 03 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.0
18 12 04 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 04 - FD Okay on mobile 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.3
18 12 04 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 10 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 10 - FD Good on mobile, police & fire 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.3
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Page 4 of 5
18 12 10 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 15 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 15 - FD Good on mobile, police & fire 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.4
18 12 15 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 16 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 16 - FD 4.3
18 12 16 - PD 4.5 4.0 4.5
18 12 09 - DC911 Slightly distorted on fire 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.3
18 12 09 - FD Clear on mobile; okay on police 4.5 4.5 3.5 4.3
18 12 09 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.0
18 12 21 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 21 - FD Not clear on mobile 3.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
18 12 21 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 28 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 28 - FD Great on mobile, police & fire 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 28 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 20 - DC911 Slightly distorted on fire 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.3
18 12 20 - FD Clear on mobile 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 20 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 29 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 29 - FD Good on mobile, police & fire 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.3
18 12 29 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 30 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 30 - FD Okay on mobile, police & fire 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 12 30 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 25 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 25 - FD Good on mobile & police; okay on fire 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
18 11 25 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.0
18 11 36 - DC911 Slight distortion on fire 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.3
18 11 36 - FD Great on mobile; okay on police; good on fire 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.4
18 11 36 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 26 - DC911 Slight distortion on police 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.3
18 11 26 - FD Okay on mobile 4.0 4.5 3.7
18 11 26 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 27 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 27 - FD Good on mobile, police & fire 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.3
18 11 27 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 23 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 23 - FD Great on mobile; good on police & fire 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 23 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 24 - DC911 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
18 11 24 - FD Great on mobile; good on police & fire 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.4
18 11 24 - PD 4.5 4.5 4.5
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Page 5 of 5