d mtk 0806723 bibliography

7/29/2019 d Mtk 0806723 Bibliography

1/13

Daftar Pustaka

Arends, R.I. (1997). Classroom Instruction and Management. Boston: McGrawHill.

Arikunto, S. (2005). Dasar-dasar Evakuasi Pendidikan (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta:

Bumi Aksara.

Arnawa, I.M (2006). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pembuktian Mahasiswa dalam

Aljabar Abstrak melalui Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Teori APOS. Desertasi

pada PPs UPI Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.

Ausubel, D.P (1963). The Psychology of Meaningful Learning. New York : Grune

and Stratton.

Azwar, S. (2007). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman

& Company.

Banihashemi, S.S.A.(2003). Connection of Old and New Mathematics on Works

of Islamic Mathematician with a Look to Role of History of Mathematics on

Education of Mathematics. [Online]. Informing Science. Tersedia:

http://proceedings.informingscience.org/IS2003Proceedings/docs/009Banih.

pdf[2 April 2009].

Bell, F.H. (1993). Teaching and Learning Mathematics. IOWA : WCB.

Bergeson, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning Mathematics: Using Research to

Shift From the Yesterday Mind to the Tommorow Mind. [Online].

Tersedia: www.k12.wa.us. [20 April 2009].

Blosser, P.E. (1990). Research matters to the Science Teacher No.9001. Using

Question In Science Classrooms. Columbus, OH: Professor of Science

Education, Ohio State University.

Bruner, J, Alison, J and Kathy, S (1976).Its Role in Development and Evaluation.

New York : Basic Books.

Campbell, L, et al. (1996). Teaching and Learning Through Multiple

Intelligences. Massachussets : Alyn and Bacon

Carr, R.A. (1981). Theory and Practice of Peer Counceling. Ottawa : Canada

Employment and Immigration Commission.

Carr, W and Kemmis, S. (1989). Being Critical : Education, Knowledge, and

Action Reseach. London : Falmen Press.


2/13

281

Cardelle, M.E. (1995).Effect of Teaching Metacognitive Skills to Student with low

Mathematics Ability. In M.J. Dunkin & N.L. Gage (Eds), Teaching andTeacher Education : An International Journal of Reseach and Studies 8,

109-111. Oxford : Pergamon Press.

Carter, T.D. (2005). Peer Counseling: Roles, Functions, Boundaries. ILRU

Program. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.peercounseling.com. [28 Mei

2010].

Cowie,H, and Wallace, P (2000). Peer Support in Action: From Bystanding to

Standing By. London : Sage Publications.

Coxford, A.F. (1991).Geometry from Multiple Perspectives. Curriculum andEvaluation Standart for Scholl Mathemaics Addenda Series. Grades 9-12,

edited by Cristian R. Hirsh. reston, Va : NCTM.

Coxford, A.F. (1995). The Case for Connections, dalam Connecting

Mathematics across the Curriculum. Editor: House, P.A. dan Coxford, A.F.

Reston, Virginia: NCTM.

Creswell, J.W. (1994).Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches.California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Cuoco, A.A., Goldenberg, E.P., Mark, J. (1995). Connecting Geometry with theRest of Mathematics, dalam Connecting Mathematics across the

Curriculum. Editor: House, P.A. dan Coxford, A.F. Reston, Virginia:

NCTM.

Dahar, R.W (1989). Teori-teori Belajar. Jakarta : Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan

Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. of How Children Learn

Mathematics: Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol.27,

No.1, January 1996, 100-106.

Davis (1996). One Very Complete View (Though Only One)

De Bock, D.,Verschaffel, l., and Janssens.(1998). The Predominance of The

Linier Model in Secondary Schoo Students Solution of Word Problem

Involving Length and Area of Similar Plane Figures,Educational Studies

in Mathematics, 35, 65-83.

De Corte, E., and Somers, R.(1982). Estimating The Outcome of a Task as a

Heuristic Strategy in Arithmetic Problem Solving: A Teaching Experiment

with Sixth graders, Human learning, 1, 105-121.


3/13

282

De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., Van Coillie, V. (1988). Influence of Number Size,

Problem Structure and Response Mode on Childrens Solution of Multipli-

cation Word Problems,Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 7, 197-216.

De Corte, E., Greer, B., and Verschaffel, L.(1996). Psychology of Mathematics

Teaching and Learning, in D.C Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.),Hand Book of

Educational Psychology (pp. 491-549). New York: Macmillan.

De Lange (1987).Mathematics Insight and Meaning. OW. & OC. Utrecht.

Dixon, Wilfrid J., Massey, Jr Frank J.(1983).Introduction to Statistical Analysis.

Fourth Edition. Los Angeles: Mc. Graw-Hill, Inc. All Right reserved.

Eggen, P.D and Kauchak, D (1996). Education Psychology: ClassroomConnections. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Ernest, P.(1991). The Philosopy of Mathematics Education. London: The Falmer

Press.

Emilia, E. (2008). Menulis Tesis dan Disertasi. Alpabeta : Bandung

Fauzi, A, Suryadi, D (2010). Pedagogogical Content Knowledge (PCK) melalui

Peran Guru dan Konteks dalam Antisipasi Didaktis dan Pedagogik (ADP)

Menuju Matematika Abstrak. Makalah disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional,

tanggal 27 Novmber 2010 di Yogyakarta.

Fauzi, A, dan Sabandar, J (2010). Pembentukan Lanjut Kemandirian Belajar

dalam Mengembangkan Kebiasaan Berpikir Siswa SMP dengan Pendekatan

Metakognitif. Pedagogik : Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan Kopertis Wilayah I

NAD-Sumatera Utara; ISSN N0. 1907-4077 : Kopertis Wilayah I NAD-

Sumatera Utara.

Fisher, K.W. and Danies (1980). A Theory of Cognitive Development : The

Control and Construction of Hieracies of Skill, Psycology Review, 447-531.

Flavell, J. (1976).Metacognitive Aspects of Problem Solving. In L. Resnick, (Ed.),

The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Freudenthal, Hans (1973). Mathematics as an Education Task. Dordrecht :

D.Reidel Publishing Co.

Garrison, D.R, Anderson, T, and Archer, W (2001). Critical Thingking and

Computer Conferencing : A Model and Tool to Assec Cognitive Presence.

[Online]. Tersedia: http://communitiesofinquiry.com/documents/ CogPres

Final.pdF [20 Maret 2010].


4/13

283

Glading, S.T. (1995). Group Work: A Counseling Specialty. Englewood Cliffs:

Prentice-Hall.

Goldin, G.A. (2002). Representation in Mathematical Learning and Problem

Solving. Dalam L.D English (Ed). Handbook of International Research in

Mathematics Education (IRME). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum

Associates.

Goos, M. and Geiger, V (1995). Metacognitive Activity and Collaborative

Interaction in The Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia,

Darwin, July 7-10-1995.

Goos, M. (1995).Metacognitive Knowledge, Belief, and Classroom Mathematics.

Eighteen Annual Conference of The Mathematics Education ResearchGroup of Australasia, Darwin, July 7-10 1995.

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. Woodland Hills: Dept. of

Physics, Indiana University. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.physics.

ndiana.du/~sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf [3 Januari 2011].

Hodgson, T.(1995). Connections as Problem-Solving Tools, dalam Connecting



Hudojo, H. (2002).Representasi Belajar Berbasis Masalah. Prosiding Konferensi

Nasional Matematika XI, Edisi Khusus.

Israel, Susan et al. (2005). Metacognition in Literacy Learning. Theory,

Assesment, Instruction and Professional development.Lawrence Erlbaum

Associates, Publishers : London.

Ito-Hino, K. (1995). Students Reasoning and Mathematical Connections in the

Japanese Classroom, dalam Connecting Mathematics across the

Curriculum. Editor: House, P.A. dan Coxford, A.F. Reston, Virginia:

NCTM.

Izsak, A. and Sherin, M.G. (2003). Exploring the Use of New Representations as

Resources for Teacher Learning. School Science and Mathematics, 1, 103.

Jacob, C. (2000). Belajar Bagaimana untuk Belajar Matematika: Suatu Telaah

Strategi Belajar Efektif_Prosiding_Seminar Nasional Matematika: Peran

Matematika Memasuki Millenium III. ISBN: 979-96152-0-8; 443-447.

Jurusan Matematika FMIPA ITS Surabaya, 2 November 2000.

Joyce, B. and Weil, M. (2000) Models of Teaching. New Yersey: Prentice Hall

Inc.


5/13

284

Jendriadi. (2009). Keefektifan Pembelajaran Membaca melalui Strategi Bertanya

(Question Only strategy) bagi Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemahaman

Wacana dan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Tesis pada PPsUPI Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan.

Johnson, D.W and Johnson, R (1981). Effect of Cooperative Competitive and

Individualistic Goal Structures on Achievenment : A Meta Analysis

Pshchological Bulletin, 89, (47-62).

Johnson, K.M. and Litynsky, C.L. (1995). Breathing Life into Mathematics,

dalam Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum. Editor: House, P.A.

dan Coxford, A.F. Reston, Virginia: NCTM.

Kadir, (2010). Penerapan Pembelajaran Kontekstual Berbasis Potensi Pesisirsebagai Upaya Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematik,

Komunikasi Matematik, dan Keteramilan Sosial Sisw SMP. Disertasi pada

PPs UPI Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan.

Kan, P.V, Tindall, J.D and Gray, H.D. (1985). Peer Couceling: In-Depth Look at

Traning Peer Helpers. Muncie: Accelerated Development Inc.

Kan, P.V. (1996). Peer Counseling in Explanation. [Online]. Tersedia:

http://www.peercounseling.com. [28 Mei 2010].

Kansanen, P. (2003). Studying the Realistic Bridge Between Instruction and

Learning. An Attempt to a Conceptual Whole of the Teaching-Studying-

Learning Process. Educational Studies, Vol. 29, No.2/3, 21-232.

Kaur, B (2001). Singapores School Mathematics Curriculum for the 21st

Century.

In International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Paper

Presented at the Qualifications and Currikulum Authority Conference on

Reasoning Explanation and Proof in School Mathematics and their Place in

the Intented Curriculum held from 4-6 Oct 2001 at.

Kirkley, J (2003). Principle for Teaching Problem Solving. Indiana University :Plato Learning.

Kleiman, C.M. (1995). Seeing and Thinking Mathematically in the Middle

School, dalam Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum. Editor:

House, P.A. dan Coxford, A.F. Reston, Virginia: NCTM.

Kramarski, B. and Mizrachi, N. (2004). Enhancing Mathematical Literacy with

The Use of Metacognitive Guidance in Forum Discussion. In Proceeding of

the 28th

Conference of International Group for Psychology of Mathematics

Education [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.biu.ac.il/ edtech/E-kramarski.htm.

[10 Juni 2009].


6/13

285

Kramarski, B. and Mevarech, Z. (2004).Metacognitive Discourse in Mathematics

Classrooms. In Journal European Research in Mathematics Education III

(Thematic Group 8) [Online]. Dalam CERME 3 [Online]. Provided :http://www.dm.unipi.it/~didattica/CERME3/proceedings/ Groups/TG8/TG8

Kramarski_cerme3.pdf. [12 Juli 2009].

Kramarski, B. and Mevarech, Z.R. (1997). Cognitive - Metacognitive Training

within a Problem Solving Based Logo Environment. British Journal of

Educational Psychology,67, 425-445.

Krutetski, V. A (1976). The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in School

Children. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press.

Krulik, S. and Rudnick, J. (1995). Projects in the Middle School MathematicsCurriculum, dalam Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum.

Editor: House, P.A. dan Coxford, A.F. Reston, Virginia: NCTM.

Kuhn, D. (1991). Education for Thinking: What can psychology contribute?

In M.Schwebel, C.A. Maher, & N.S.Fagley (Eds),Promoting cognitive

growth over the life span. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kurz, R.E.(1991). Annotated Instructors Edition, Teaching Elementary

Mathematics. Baston : Allyn and Bacon

Kusuma, Y.S. (2008). Konsep, Pengembangan dan Implementasi Computer-

Based Learning dalam Peningkatan Kemampuan High-Order Mathematics

Thingking. Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar Pendidikan Matematika

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 23 Oktober 2008 di Bandung.

Kwon, J and Lee, G. (2001). What do We Know about Student Cognitive Conflict

in Science Classroom: a Theorical Model of Cognitive Conflict Process,

[Online]. Tersedia : http://www.ed.psu.edu/c1/journals/2001[15 April

2009].

Lastari, Aat. (2008). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman dan PenalaranMatematis Siswa SMA melalui Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan

Metakognitif. Tesis pada PPs UPI: Tidak diterbitkan.

Laursen, E.K. (2005). Rather Than Fixing Kids-Build Positive Peer Cultures.

Reclaiming Children and Youth. 14. (3). 137 142 (ProQuest Education

Journals).

Leake, L. (1995). Cennecting Number and Geometri, dalam Connecting




7/13

286

Lester, F., Garofalo, J., and Kroll, D. (1989). The Role of Metacognition in

Mathematical Problem Solving: A Study of Two grade Seven Classes (Final

Report to The National Science Foundation, NSF Project No. MDR 85-50346). Blomington: Indiana University, Mathematics Education

Development Center.

Lie, A (2005). Pembelajaran Kooperatif suatu Model Pembelajaran. Gramedia :

Jakarta.

Lipton,L, and Hubble, D (2010). Menumbuhkembangkan Kemandirian Belajar.

Nuansa : Bandung

Livingston, Jennifer A (1997).Metakognition : An Overview. [Online]. Tersedia :

http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/CEP564/Metacog.html.[15 Maret 2009].

Lo, S. (2006). Defining the Peer Advisor in the U.S. Study Abroad Context.

Journal of Studies in International Education. 10 (2). 173-184.

Malone, J.A. and Krismanto,A (1997). Indonesian Student Attitudes and

Perception Toward Small Group Work in Mathematics Journal of Science

and Mathematyics Education in South Weast Asia: Vol XVI No. 2 tahun

1997.

Masingila, J.O. (1995). Carpet Laying: An Illustration of Everyday

Mathematics, dalam Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum.


Maulana, (2007). Alternatif Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan

Metakognitif untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa

PGSD. Bandung: Tesis pada PPs UPI: Tidak dipublikasikan.

Mayer, R. E. (1987). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem

solving.Instructional Science, 26, 49-63.

Mayer, R.E., et al (1991). Mathematical Problem Solving in Japan and the United

States: A Controlled Comparison.Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol.

83, No. 1 , 69-72.

McCoy, L.P., Baker, T.H., and Little, S. (1996). Using Multiple Representations

to Communicate: An Algebra Challenge. Dalam P.C Elliot dan M.J Kenney

(Eds). Yearbook Communication in Mathematics K-12 and Beyond. Reston,

VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The Relationship between Mathematics Preparation and

Conceptual Learning Gains in Physics: a Possible Hidden Variable in

Diagnostic Pretest Scores. Ames, Iowa: Department of Physics and

Astronomy. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.physics.iastate.edu/per/

docs/Addendum_on_normalized_gain.pdf[4 Februarit 2010].


8/13

287

Mevarech, Z.R. and Kramarski, B (1997). IMPROVE: A Multidimensional

Method for Teaching Mathematics in Heterogeneous Classroom. American

Educational Research Journal, 34(2).

Mikovch, A.K and Monroe, E.E (1994). Making Mathematical Connection Across

The Curriculum : Activities to Help Teachers Begin. School Science and

Mathematics. 94(7)

Mohini, M. and Nai Ten, Tan. (2004). The Use of Metacognitive Process in

Learning Mathematics. In The Mathematics Education into the 21th

Century

Project University Teknologi Malasyia. [Online]. Tersedia : http://math.

unipa.it/~grim/21_project/21_malasya_mohini159_162 05.pdf. [20 Agustus

2009].

Muijs, D. and Reynolds, D. (2008). Effective Teaching Teori dan Aplikasi, EdisiKedua. Terjemah oleh: Drs. Helly Prajitno Soetjipto, M.A. dan Dra. Sri

Mulyantini Soetjipto. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Mullis, M, Gonzalez and Chrostowski (2004).TIMSS 2003 International

Mathematics Report: Findings from IEAs Trends in International

Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eight Grades. TIMSS &

PIRLS International Study Center.Lynch School of Education, Boston

College.

Muin, A, Sumarno, U, Sabandar, J (2006). Metacognitive Approach to ImproveMathematics Skills of High School Students. International Journal of

Education Vol.1, No.1, Nopember 2006. hal 68-86.

Muro, J.J, and Kottman, T. (1995). Guidence and Counseling in the Elementary

and Midlle School: A Practical Approach. Madison: Brown & Benchmark.

National Council of Teacher of Mathematyics (1989). Curriculum and Standard

for School Mathematics. Reston,V.A: NCTM.

National Council of Teacher of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standards

for School Mathematics. Reston, VA : Author.

National Council of Teacher of Mathematics (2003). Curriculum and Standard

for School Mathematics. Reston,V.A: NCTM. defining Problem Solving.

[online]. Tersedia : http://www. learner.org/channel/courses/teachingmath/

gradesk_2/session_03_a.html. [11 Februari 2010].

Nickerson, A.B. and Nagle, R.J. (2005). Parent and Peer Attachment in Late

Chidhood and Early Adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence. 25 (2). 223

249. Sage Publications.


9/13

288

Nindiasari, H. (2004). Pembelajaran Metakognitif untuk Meningkatkan

Pemahaman dan Koneksi Matematik Siswa SMU Ditinjau dari

Perkembangan Kognitif Siswa. Tesis pada PPs UPI Bandung: Tidakditerbitkan.

Nort Central Regional Education Laboratory (NCREL), (1995) [online]. Tersedia

:http//www.neat.tas.edu.au.htm. [2 Maret 2010].

Oakley, L. (2004). Cognitive Development Routledge: London and New York.

Olkun, S. (2003). Making Connections : Improving Spasial Abilities with

Engineering Drawing Activities. [online]. Tersedia : http//www.ex.ac.

uk/cimt/ijmtl/ijabout.htm. [11 Februari 2010]. International Journal of

Mathematics Teaching and Learning.

ONeil Jr, H.F. and Brown, R.S. (1997). Differential Effect of Question Formats

in Math Assessment on Metacognition and Affect. Los Angeles: CRESST-

CSE University of California.

Panaoura, A, and Philippou, G (2004). Young Pupils Metacognitive Abilities in

Mathematics in Relation to Working Memory and Processing Efficiency.

University of Cyprus, Cyprus.

Paris,S.G and Winograd, P (2004). The Role of Self-Regulated Learning in

Contextual Teaching : Principles and Practices for Teacher Preparation.

[online]. Tersedia : http://www.ciera.org/Library/archive/200104/0104

parwin.htm [27 maret 2010].

Pape, S.J. et.al. (2003). Developing Mathematics Thinking and Self-Regulated

Learning: Teaching Experiment in Seventh-Grade Mathematics

Classroom.Journal Educational Studies in Mathematics. 53. 179-202.

Perfect, T. J. and Schwartz, B, L (2002). Applied Metacognition. Cambridge

University Press. Australia.

Piaget,J. (1970). Piagets Theory. In Carmichaels Manual of Child Psychology.

Edited by Paul H. Mussen .New York : John Wiley and Sons.

Plomp, T. (1997). Educational & Training Systems Design. Enschede,

Netherlands: Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, University of

Twente.

Polya, G. (1985). How to Solve It. A New Aspect of Mathematical Methods. New

Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.


10/13

289

Prabawa, H, W. (2009). Peningkatan Kemampuan Penalaran dan Pemecahan

Masalah Matematis Siswa SMA melalui Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan

Metakognitif. Tesis pada PPs UPI Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan.

Pugalee, D.A. (2001). Using Communication to Develop Students Mathematical

Literacy. Dalam Journal Research of Mathematics Education 6 (5). 296-

299. [Online]. Tersedia: http// www.my.nctm.org/ercsources/article-

summary.asp?URI-MTMS 2001-01-296aandfrom [17 April 2009].

Ratnaningsih, N. (2007). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Kontekstual terhadap

Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif Matematik serta Kemandirian

Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. Disertasi pada PPs UPI Bandung:

Tidak diterbitkan.

Ridley, D.S. et.al. (1992). Self Regulated Learning : the interactive influence of

metacognitive awareness and goal-setting. Journal of Experimental

Education 60 (4), 293-306.

Rohaeti, E, E (2003). Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Menggunakan Metode

IMPROVE untuki Meningkatkan Pemahaman dan Kemampuan Komunikasi

Matematik Siswa Sekolah Lanjutan Tingkat Pertama (SLTP). Tesis pada

PPs UPI Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan.

Royer, J.M. (1996). Designing Instruction to Produce Understanding. In G.D

Phye & T. Andre (Eds). Cognitive Classroom Learning. Florida : Academic

Publisher.

Ruseffendi, E.T. (1998a). Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Pendidikan dan Bidang Non

Eksakta Lainnya. Bagi para Peneliti, Penulis Skripsi, Penulis Tesis, Penulis

Disertasi, Dosen Metode Penelitian, dan Mahasiswa. Semarang: IKIP

Semarang Press.

Ruseffendi, E.T. (1998b). Statistika Dasar untuk Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung:

IKIP Bandung Press.

Ruseffendi, E.T. (2005). Dasar-dasar Penelitian Pendidikan dan Bidang Non-

Eksakta Lainnya. Bandung: Tarsito.

Ruseffendi, E.T. (2006). Pengantar Kepada Membantu Guru Mengembangkan

Kompetensinya dalam Pengajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan CBSA.

Bandung: Tarsito.

Sabandar, J. (2005). Pertanyaan Tantangan dalam memunculkan Berpikir Kritis

dan Kreatif dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Makalah pada Seminar MIPA

di JICA UPI Bandung : tidak diterbitkan.


11/13

290

Sabandar, J. (2007). Berpikir Reflektif. Makalah pada Seminar Tingkat Nasional

FMIPA UPI Bandung : tidak diterbitkan.

Saragih, S (2008). Profil Kemampuan Keruangan Siswa SMP di Kota Pekan Baru,

FKIP Universitas Riau Pekanbaru. Hasil Penelitian: Tidak dipublikasikan.

Santrrock, J.W. (2004).Life-Span Development. Ninth Edition. Boston: McGraw-

Hill Companies.

Sapaat, A. (2001). Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Keterampilan Metakognitif

untuk mengembangkan Kompetensi Matematik Siswa. [On Line]. Tersedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/martingale.%28betting.system.[17 April 2009].

Sharples, J and Mathews, B (1989). Learning How to Learn : InvestigatingEffective Learning Strategies. Victoria: Office of School Administration

Ministry of Education.

Shirley, L. (1995). Using Ethnomathematics to Find Multicultural Mathematical

Connections, dalam Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum.


Slavin, R, E. (1997).Educational Psychology. Theory and Practice.Fifth Edition.

Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Steinberg, L, (1993).Adolescence. New York: Mc. Graw-Hill, Inc.

Sudijono, A. (2005). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: RajaGrafindoPersada.

Sudjana. (1996).Metoda Statistika. Bandung: Tarsito.

Suherman, E. (2003).Evaluasi Pengajaran Matematika. Bandung: UPI.

Sumarmo, U. (2004). Kemandirian Belajar : Apa, Mengapa dan Bagaimana

Dikembangkan pada Peserta Didik. Makalah Disajikan pada Seminar

Pendidikan Matematika di Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPAUniversitas Yogyakarta tangggal 8 Juli 2004 : tidak diterbitkan.

Sumarmo, U. (2005). Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Mendukung Pelaksanaan

Kurikulum Tahun 2002 Sekolah Menengah. Makalah pada Seminar

Pendidikan Matematika di FPMIPA Universitas Gorontalo tanggal 7

Agustus 2005.

Sumarmo, U. (2010). Berpikir dan Disposisi Matematik: Apa, Mengapa, dan

Bagaimana dikembangkan pada Peserta Didik. [Online]

http://math.sps.upi.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Berpikir-dan-Disposisi-

Matematik-SPS-2010.pdf. [25 Februari 2010].


12/13

291

Suparno, P (2001). Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Jean Piaget. Yogyakarta:

KanasiusSuryadi, D. (2005). Penggunaan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Tidak Langsung serta

Pendekatan Gabungan Langsung dan Tidak Langsung dalam Rangka

Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Matematik Tingkat Tinggi Siswa SMP.

Disertasi pada PPs UPI Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan.

Suryadi, D. (2010). Metapedadidaktik dan Didactical Design Research (DDR):

Sintesis Hasil Pemikiran Berdasarkan Lesson Study. Teori Paradigma,

Prinsip, dan Pendekatan Pembelajaran MIPA dalam Konteks Indonesia.

JICA FMIPA UPI. Bandung.

Suzana, Y. (2003), Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman dan PenalaranMatematik Siswa SMU melalui Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan

Metakognitif. Tesis pada PPs UPI Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan.

Syaodih, E. (2007). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif untukMeningkatkan Keterampilan Sosial Siswa. (Studi pada Mata PelajaranIlmu Pengetahuan Sosial di Sekolah Dasar). Disertasi Doktor pada SPsUPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.

Tata. (2009). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa melalui

Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Metakognitif Berorientasi Teori Van

Hiele. Tesis pada PPs UPI: Tidak diterbitkan.

TIM MKPBM (2001). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer.

Bandung: UPI.

Tim Penyusun Kamus Pusat Bahasa. (2001). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia.

Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Tomo (2002). Mengintegrasikan Teknik Membaca SQ3R dan membuat Catatan

Berbentuk Graphic Postorganizer dalam Pembelajaran Fisika. Disertasi

pada PPs UPI Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.

Tyler, R.W. (1991). Curriculum Resources. In A. Lewy (Ed). The International

Encyclopedia of Curriculum. Oxford : Pergamon Press.

Uyanto, S.S. (2009). Pedoman Analisis Data dengan SPSS. Graha Ilmu:

Yogyakarta.

Verschaffel, L., et al, (1999). Learning to Solve Mathematical Application

Problems: A Design Experiment with Fifth Graders. Mathematical Thinking

and Learning, 1999, 1(3), 195-229.


13/13

292

Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and

Learning. London: Falmer Press.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University

Press.

Wardani, S. (2009). Pembelajaran Inquiri Model Silver untuk Mengembangkan

Kreativitas dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematik Siswa Sekolah

Menengah Atas. Disertasi pada PPs UPI Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan.

Webb, N.M (1989). Peer Interaction and Learning in Small Groups.International

Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-39.

Wolters, C.A; Pintrich, P.R; and Karabenick, S.A (2003). Assessing AcademicSelf-Regulated Learning. [online] Tersedia: www.childrends.org/Files/

Wolters Pintrich Karabenick Paper.pdf.[11Nopember 2009].

Zimmerman, B.J. (1989). A Sosial Cognitive view of Self-Regulated Academic

Learning.Journal of Educational Psychology. 81(3). 329-339.

d mtk 0806723 bibliography

Documents