d. galarreta(1), p.j. charrel (2), t. orel (3), b. rothenburger (4), b. trousse (5), c. vogel (6)...

15
D. Galarreta(1), P.J. Charrel (2), T. Orel (3), B. Rothenburger (4), B. Trousse (5), C. Vogel (6) (1)CNES;(2) IRIT-UT1; (3)Europia productions;(4) INRIA-IRIT ; (5) INRIA Sophia-Antipolis ; (6) Pôle Universitaire Léonard de Vinci STUDY OF DYNAMIC VIEWPOINTS IN SATELLITE DESIGN

Upload: george-taylor

Post on 14-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: D. Galarreta(1), P.J. Charrel (2), T. Orel (3), B. Rothenburger (4), B. Trousse (5), C. Vogel (6) (1)CNES;(2) IRIT-UT1; (3)Europia productions;(4) INRIA-IRIT

D. Galarreta(1), P.J. Charrel (2), T. Orel (3), B. Rothenburger (4), B. Trousse (5), C. Vogel (6)

(1)CNES;(2) IRIT-UT1; (3)Europia productions;(4) INRIA-IRIT ; (5) INRIA Sophia-Antipolis ; (6) Pôle Universitaire Léonard de Vinci

STUDY OF DYNAMIC VIEWPOINTS IN SATELLITE

DESIGN

Page 2: D. Galarreta(1), P.J. Charrel (2), T. Orel (3), B. Rothenburger (4), B. Trousse (5), C. Vogel (6) (1)CNES;(2) IRIT-UT1; (3)Europia productions;(4) INRIA-IRIT

Viewpoints in satellite design

A viewpoint is the manner attached to a person or a group to represent the technical world within which they operate.

Page 3: D. Galarreta(1), P.J. Charrel (2), T. Orel (3), B. Rothenburger (4), B. Trousse (5), C. Vogel (6) (1)CNES;(2) IRIT-UT1; (3)Europia productions;(4) INRIA-IRIT

Views from different viewpoints

« Onboard power » view : Power storage

« Attitude Control » view

« Thermal Control » view

« Ground Segment » view : Operation Control Centre

Page 4: D. Galarreta(1), P.J. Charrel (2), T. Orel (3), B. Rothenburger (4), B. Trousse (5), C. Vogel (6) (1)CNES;(2) IRIT-UT1; (3)Europia productions;(4) INRIA-IRIT

Confrontation and Correlation of viewpoints

• Before any interaction is considered the viewpoints virtually exist ;

• If the viewpoints interact one says that there is a confrontation of viewpoints. One can assess the views dependencies ;

• If the views which are produced are semantically and logically compatible one says that the viewpoints are correlated.

Page 5: D. Galarreta(1), P.J. Charrel (2), T. Orel (3), B. Rothenburger (4), B. Trousse (5), C. Vogel (6) (1)CNES;(2) IRIT-UT1; (3)Europia productions;(4) INRIA-IRIT

Objects

• Whenever a view is produced ignoring any other view : the view designates a virtual object ;

• When there is a confrontation of viewpoints, a view designate an actualized object ;

• When all the considered viewpoints are correlated, a view designate a realized object

Page 6: D. Galarreta(1), P.J. Charrel (2), T. Orel (3), B. Rothenburger (4), B. Trousse (5), C. Vogel (6) (1)CNES;(2) IRIT-UT1; (3)Europia productions;(4) INRIA-IRIT

The correlation problem

Given a viewpoint modelling, how can we model the correlation of viewpoints in order that a realized object emerges ?

Page 7: D. Galarreta(1), P.J. Charrel (2), T. Orel (3), B. Rothenburger (4), B. Trousse (5), C. Vogel (6) (1)CNES;(2) IRIT-UT1; (3)Europia productions;(4) INRIA-IRIT

Argumentative approach of viewpoints

C= (W, R, F, E, P)

Design Design DesignedProcess Représentation Object

(W) (R) (F) (E) (P)

• Interaction spaces :• Argumentation space ;• Communication space ;• Solving problem space

• Isotopies :• Work (W)• Fashion (F)• Purpose (P)• Aesthetic Form (E)• Representation (R)

• Elementary arguments :• Topoï

Page 8: D. Galarreta(1), P.J. Charrel (2), T. Orel (3), B. Rothenburger (4), B. Trousse (5), C. Vogel (6) (1)CNES;(2) IRIT-UT1; (3)Europia productions;(4) INRIA-IRIT

An approach of viewpoints based upon statistical association of terms

• Clusterisation

• AFT profile construction

• Scenario production

• Viewpoints

Page 9: D. Galarreta(1), P.J. Charrel (2), T. Orel (3), B. Rothenburger (4), B. Trousse (5), C. Vogel (6) (1)CNES;(2) IRIT-UT1; (3)Europia productions;(4) INRIA-IRIT

A multi-agent paradigm approach :A diachronic model

correlation sur la classe A

-0,11

-0,09

-0,07

-0,05

-0,03

-0,01

0,01

0,03

0,05

1 7

13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97

103

109

115

121

127

133

139

145

151

157

163

169

175

th-t t-f th-f

temps

Thematic dynamic(Discursive dynamic )

• A generic model• An instanciation of it :

• the Alceste methodology

-Class A : Compress, How many, Year , Apogée, arrival, Tank, Bit, Cells, Hundred, Figures (numbers), Five, Fifty, Coefficient, Cube, Degree, …

-Class B : Elsewhere, Point, Really, Altitude, Analyse, Antenna, Advantage, Bilan, Box, Camera, Control, Bother, Problem, Exist, …

-Class C : Show, Transmit, Now, Aerospace, Probably, Ariane, Asteroide, Astronautic, autonomy, bitsy, onboard, Camera, Chain, …

-Class D : Know, Write, Must, Finish, Open, Can, Transform, Know (by study), Remember, See, Will, Enough, As much, At last, Some, Always, Architecture,

Page 10: D. Galarreta(1), P.J. Charrel (2), T. Orel (3), B. Rothenburger (4), B. Trousse (5), C. Vogel (6) (1)CNES;(2) IRIT-UT1; (3)Europia productions;(4) INRIA-IRIT

Correlation of viewpoint : toward a restatement of the problem 1/2

A condition in order that different viewpoints can interact together, is their sharing of a same space ;

Definition : A virtual interaction of viewpoints is identified to a space ;

a space is the set of the viewpoints which are virtually in interaction.

Page 11: D. Galarreta(1), P.J. Charrel (2), T. Orel (3), B. Rothenburger (4), B. Trousse (5), C. Vogel (6) (1)CNES;(2) IRIT-UT1; (3)Europia productions;(4) INRIA-IRIT

Correlation of viewpoint : toward a restatement of the problem 2/2

• The correlation of viewpoints is gradual

• It manifests itself through the emergence of places

• It develops until the production of objects

•Given a technical space• Be able to identify an emergence of places and its dynamic

The weak correlation problem :

Page 12: D. Galarreta(1), P.J. Charrel (2), T. Orel (3), B. Rothenburger (4), B. Trousse (5), C. Vogel (6) (1)CNES;(2) IRIT-UT1; (3)Europia productions;(4) INRIA-IRIT

A correlation model in the argumentative approach

1 2 3

Correlation Space

W

FP

Significant Factorof the Argumentative Space

isotopyW

isotopyF

isotopyP

Significant Factorof the Problem Solving Space

Steps

Step 2

Page 13: D. Galarreta(1), P.J. Charrel (2), T. Orel (3), B. Rothenburger (4), B. Trousse (5), C. Vogel (6) (1)CNES;(2) IRIT-UT1; (3)Europia productions;(4) INRIA-IRIT

A correlation model in the lexicometrical approach

Propulsion

Giga bits Image Demonstration

ProjectileBit second

Page 14: D. Galarreta(1), P.J. Charrel (2), T. Orel (3), B. Rothenburger (4), B. Trousse (5), C. Vogel (6) (1)CNES;(2) IRIT-UT1; (3)Europia productions;(4) INRIA-IRIT

A diachronic Model for viewpoint correlation based on

the Alceste Methodology

correlation sur la classe A

-0,11

-0,09

-0,07

-0,05

-0,03

-0,01

0,01

0,03

0,05

1 7

13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97

103

109

115

121

127

133

139

145

151

157

163

169

175

th-t t-f th-f

temps

Thematic dynamic(Discursive dynamic )

The general variation of the curvesbuilt upon statistical classes are interpreted against :

• the discourse of each designer ;• the general movement of thisdiscourse in terms of solving thetask given.

Page 15: D. Galarreta(1), P.J. Charrel (2), T. Orel (3), B. Rothenburger (4), B. Trousse (5), C. Vogel (6) (1)CNES;(2) IRIT-UT1; (3)Europia productions;(4) INRIA-IRIT

Conclusion

• This article aimed to make the readers aware of the notion of “ viewpoint ” and “ correlation of viewpoints ” which are central for the analysis of a complex design activity (in particular for the manager of design projects) ;

• The "theoritical" step was to recognized the importance of the constitution of places as a step toward the solution of the correlation problem we introduced.