cytogenetic damage in female chilean agricultural workers exposed to mixtures of pesticides
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Cytogenetic damage in female Chilean agricultural workers exposed to mixtures of pesticides](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020402/5750046a1a28ab11489ea1f5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Research Articles
Cytogenetic Damage in Female Chilean AgriculturalWorkers Exposed toMixtures of Pesticides
CarolinaMa¤ rquez,1Cecilia Villalobos,2 Susana Poblete,1 Eva Villalobos,2
Mar|¤a de los Angeles Garc|¤a,1 and Soledad Duk1*1Laboratorio de Citogenetica y Genetica Toxicologica, Departamento de
Biologıa Celular, Facultad de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidad deConcepcion, Concepcion, Chile
2Departamento de Obstetricia y Puericultura, Facultad de Medicina,Universidad de Concepcion, Concepcion, Chile
INTRODUCTION
Since 1945, more than 15,000 individual chemicals and
35,000 formulations have been used as agricultural pesti-
cides [Forget et al., 1993]. The chemicals are an impor-
tant tool for controlling agricultural pests, but they also
represent a significant source of occupational and nonoc-
cupational exposure to potentially toxic agents.
Fruit exportation has become an important source of
Chilean income. In 1974, there were 63,000 ha of industrial
orchards; by 1994, that figure had increased to 185,040 ha
(Statistical National Institute of Chile). As a consequence,
the use of chemical pesticides has also significantly
increased, leading to a larger number of exposed workers
and higher levels of environmental exposure. The number of
people working in seasonal agriculture in Chile is estimated
at nearly 250,000, and in the workforce of the VIII Region
of Bıo-Bıo, in central Chile, many of them are women
[Wesseling et al., 1998]. The health risks associated with
this increasing exposure to pesticides among Chilean women
are presently unknown. In order to evaluate the risk, we have
carried out a biomonitoring study on seasonal female work-
ers from the VIII Region. The workers participating in the
study were employed in greenhouses, plant nurseries, and
performed pruning, sorting, harvesting, and packing, rotating
among the different tasks during the season.
Previous studies have associated acute and chronic pes-
ticide exposure with asthma, allergic dermatitis, and
respiratory disease [Zuskin et al., 1993]. Anecdotal
reports on acute poisoning, respiratory problems, vision
distress, headaches, and depression were also collected in
the present study. In addition, pesticides have been stud-
ied for their long-term risk, including their association
with increases in the incidence of cancers, such as leuke-
mia [Daniels et al., 1997], bladder cancer [Viel and
Chalier, 1995], and pancreatic cancer [Ji et al., 2001].
*Correspondence to: Soledad Duk, Casilla 160-C, Facultad de Ciencias
Biologicas, Departamento de Biologıa Celular, Universidad de Concep-
cion, Concepcion, Chile. E-mail: [email protected]
Grant sponsor: Direccion de Investigacion Universidad de Concepcion;
Grant number: 201.031.089-1.
Received 27 February 2004; provisionally accepted 24 April 2004; and
in final form 23 August 2004
DOI 10.1002/em.20085
Published online 16 December 2004 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.
wiley.com).
�c 2004Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Environmental andMolecular Mutagenesis 45:1^7 (2005)
The VIII Region of Bıo-Bıo is a major fruit-growingarea of Chile that makes intensive use of agricul-tural pesticides. The cytogenetic damage asso-ciated with exposure to mixtures of pesticides wasevaluated by comparing peripheral blood lympho-cyte micronucleus (MN) frequencies in a group of64 female agricultural workers and 30 female con-trols. The exposed subjects worked during thespring and summer in thinning and pruning fruittrees and in harvesting and packing different fruits,such as raspberries, grapes, apples, and kiwis.They did not use any protective measures duringtheir work activities. A significant increase in the fre-
quency of binucleated cells with micronuclei(BNMN) was found in the exposed women as com-pared with the controls (36.94 � 14.47 vs. 9.93 �6.17 BNMN/1000 BN cells; P < 0.001). The fre-quency of BNMN varied as a function of age inboth the exposed and control groups, but no corre-lation was found between BNMN frequency andthe duration of exposure. Also, smoking and otherhabits had no effect on MN frequency. Our studyconfirms that occupational exposure to pesticidemixtures results in cytogenetic damage. Environ.Mol. Mutagen. 45:1–7, 2005. �c 2004 Wiley-Liss,Inc.
Key words: cytogenetic; micronucleus; women; pesticides; occupational exposure
![Page 2: Cytogenetic damage in female Chilean agricultural workers exposed to mixtures of pesticides](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020402/5750046a1a28ab11489ea1f5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Genotoxic potential is a primary risk factor for long-term
effects such as carcinogenic and reproductive disorders.
In a retrospective study, Rojas et al. [2000] made the first
attempt to associate congenital malformations with pesti-
cide exposure in Chile. Genotoxicological biomonitoring
in human populations is a useful tool to estimate the
genetic risk from an integrated exposure to complex mix-
tures of chemicals [Bolognesi, 2003].
The micronucleus (MN) assay is a genotoxicity biomoni-
toring method that has been used widely for evaluating risk
in human populations exposed to carcinogens and/or muta-
gens [Tucker and Preston, 1996; Garcıa et al., 1999;
Fenech, 2000]. Micronuclei are formed from acentric
chromosomal fragments or whole chromosomes left behind
during mitotic cellular division, allowing the detection of
clastogenic and aneugenic events. Micronuclei reflect
chromosomal damage and may thus provide a marker of
early-stage carcinogenesis [Bonassi et al., 2003]. There are
a number of reports with positive findings of cytogenetic
effects in the lymphocytes of people exposed to pesticides
[Dulout et al., 1985; de Ferrari et al., 1991; Bolognesi
et al., 1993; Gomez-Arroyo et al., 2000]. Other studies,
however, have obtained negative results [Carbonell et al.,
1990; Scarpato et al., 1996; Lucero et al., 2000].
Our study group contained seasonal agricultural working
women from the VIII Region of Bıo-Bıo, Chile. Even
though the women in the exposed population were not
directly involved in pesticide handling, there were some
cases of acute exposure. This often was due to early
entrance into the field, fumigation of nearby orchards, and
pesticide drift. Chronic exposure resulted from touching the
fumigated fruit with bare hands, working in their everyday
clothing, eating in the orchard, and having only sporadic
access to fresh running water. For both types of exposure,
the workers wore no protective equipment, not even gloves.
In Chile, genotoxic damage due to pesticide exposure
has been evaluated only in a group of 22 men who
employed protective measures [Venegas et al., 1998].
This is the first monitoring study of women exposed to
mixtures of pesticides in the VIII Region of this country.
We compared chromosomal damage in a group of
exposed agricultural women laborers and a group of con-
trol women. The statistical analysis controlled for poten-
tial confounding factors such as smoking and alcohol
consumption. A significant increase in chromosomal
damage was found in the exposed group.
MATERIALS ANDMETHODS
Study Population
A total of 94 Caucasian women from the VIII Region of Bıo-Bıo, Chile,
were analyzed in this study. Sixty-four temporary women workers com-
prised the exposed group and worked in contact with a complex mixture of
pesticides (Table I); they rotated among different tasks during the season.
The control group had no contact with pesticides or any particular environ-
mental genotoxic agent, since they were mainly homemakers or office
workers in urban Concepcion. The socioeconomic and educational levels
of the control group were higher than those of the exposed. Prior to the
blood sampling, a standard health, family, and work history questionnaire
was completed (questionnaire available upon request), and confounding
factors were considered for exclusion. All individuals contacted agreed to
participate and signed an informed consent agreement. In the case of the
exposed group, further questions related to farming were included, such as
pesticide use and duration of exposure.
Lymphocyte Cultures andMNAnalysis
Blood samples were obtained by venipuncture in June–July (2000–
2002), after the women finished their work season, which lasted between
October and March (1999–2001). All blood specimens were collected in
sterile tubes with sodium heparin and were processed within 24 hr. Two
lymphocyte cultures per subject were initiated by adding 0.5 ml of whole
TABLE I. Pesticides to Which Agricultural Women AreExposed in Bıo-Bıo, Chile, Indicating the Type,World Health Organization (WHO) HazardClassification, and CAS Numbers
a
Type Product Class (WHO) CAS number
Insecticides Azinfos metil II 86-50-0
Azomark I 6923-22-4
Belmark III 51630-58-1
Diazinon III 333-41-5
Furadan II 1563-66-2
Imidan III 732-11-6
Metamidofos II 10265-92-6
Mimic IV 112410-23-8
Fungicide Sulphur IV 7704-34-9
Benlate IV 17804-35-2
Captan IV 133-06-2
Cuprodul IV 1317-39-1
Hortyl IV 1897-45-6
Manzate IV 8018-01-7
Metalaxil IV 70630-17-0
Herbicide Afalon IV 330-55-2
Paraquat II 1910-42-5
MCPA III 94-74-6
Simazina IV 112-34-9
Atrazina IV 1912-24-9
Betanal IV 13684-63-4/1368-56-5/
26225-79-6
Linurex IV 330-55-2
aData obtained by the authors through a checklist in field trips to the
orchards to detect compliance with sanitary conditions required by law.
TABLE II. General Characteristics of the Study Groups
Control Exposed P
Number of subjects 30 64
Years of age (mean � SD) 36.6 � 11.4 40.5 � 7.8 0.1156
Years of exposure (mean � SD) 8.0 � 4.8
Smoking 0.4337
Number of nonsmokers 17 (56.7%) 41 (64.1%)
Number of smokers 13 (43.3%) 23 (35.9%)
Alcohol consumption 0.5839
Number of nondrinkers 12 (40%) 30 (46.9)
Number of drinkers 18 (60%) 34 (53.1)
2 Ma¤ rquez et al.
![Page 3: Cytogenetic damage in female Chilean agricultural workers exposed to mixtures of pesticides](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020402/5750046a1a28ab11489ea1f5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
blood to 4.5 ml RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inacti-
vated fetal calf serum, 1% antibiotics (penicillin and streptomycin), and L-
glutamine, all provided by Gibco-Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Lymphocytes
were stimulated by 1% phytohemagglutinin (Gibco-Invitrogen) and incu-
bated for 72 hr at 378C. Cytochalasin B (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was added
at a final concentration of 6 mg/ml after 44 hr of culture to arrest cytokin-
esis. At the end of the incubation, the cultures were harvested by centrifu-
gation at 150 g for 8 min and treated 2–3 min at 48C with a hypotonic
solution (0.075 M KCl). After centrifugation, the cells were treated twice
with cold fixative solution (3:1 methanol:acetic acid). The cells were then
resuspended in a small volume of the fixative and dropped onto clean
slides. The slides were stained with 10% Giemsa (Merck, Darmstadt,
Germany) in phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) for 10 min, coded, and
scored without knowledge of their identity.
A single individual carried out the microscopic analysis. Two coded
slides were scored per subject. A total of 1,000 binucleated cells with
well-preserved cytoplasm were scored in order to determine the fre-
quency of binucleated cells with micronuclei (BNMN) and the total
number of micronuclei in binucleated lymphocytes (MNL). In addition,
500 lymphocytes were scored to evaluate the percentage of cells with
one to four nuclei, and the cytokinesis block proliferation index (CBPI)
was calculated.
Statistical Analysis
Nonparametric statistical tests were used. The experimental unit for
statistical evaluations was the study subject. The Mann-Whitney U-test
was used to detect differences between the mean of BNMN, MNL, and
CBPI in the exposed workers and the controls. Statistical analyses were
performed on the mean MN frequencies for each individual for all
cytogenetic variables. The relationship between age and BNMN fre-
quency was evaluated using regression analysis. All data were analyzed
using the CSS Statistica software package (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK). The
level of significance was taken as P < 0.05.
RESULTS
The main characteristics of the study groups, such as age,
smoking habits, and duration of exposure to pesticides, are
presented in Table II. Information about acute poisoning,
respiratory problems, and other health problems were col-
lected during the investigation; the results are presented in
Figure 1. The exposed subjects who had health complaints
did not have a higher frequency of micronuclei than the rest
of the exposed group. To evaluate lifestyle factors, donors
were stratified as smokers or nonsmokers and as alcohol
drinkers or nondrinkers. Smokers were current smokers and
smoked between 1 and 10 cigarettes/week. Drinkers con-
sumed between 50 and 500 ml/week of beer or wine. Age
and lifestyle factors were not significantly different between
the control and exposed group (Table II). No correlation
was observed between smoking habits (Table III) or alcohol
consumption (not shown) and the frequency of BNMN for
either the exposed or the control group. The age of the
exposed workers ranged from 25 to 56 years, with a mean
of 40.5 � 7.8, while the age of nonexposed controls ranged
from 20 to 58 years, with a mean of 36.6 � 11.4. A posi-
tive correlation was found between age and BNMN fre-
quency for both groups. Figure 2 shows the relationship
between these two variables. The Spearman regression
coefficient for the exposed group was 0.321 (P < 0.01);
for the control group, 0.629 (P < 0.01). The slope for the
line in the exposed group is twice the slope of the control.
TABLE III. Effect of Smoking on Median BNMN Frequencyfor Exposed and Control Groups
Group/smoking status n BNMN/1,000 cells (range) P
Exposed
Nonsmokers 41 39 (16–79) 0.1895
Smokers 23 33 (9–62)
Control
Nonsmokers 17 10 (2–26) 0.4144
Smokers 13 9 (2–23)
Fig. 2. Correlation between age and BNMN frequency for the exposed
and the control groups. Open square: control group; Spearman correla-
tion (rs) ¼ 0.629; P < 0.01. Closed circle: exposed group; rs ¼ 0.321;
P < 0.01.
Fig.1. Major health complaints of exposed group.
Cytogenetic Damage 3
![Page 4: Cytogenetic damage in female Chilean agricultural workers exposed to mixtures of pesticides](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020402/5750046a1a28ab11489ea1f5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Tables IV and V present individual BNMN and MNL
frequencies for the exposed and control group, and Figure 3
presents the distribution of these frequencies. The data indi-
cate that there was no obvious subpopulation of people with
very high BNMN levels, which led to an increase in the
mean of the exposed subjects. Table IV also includes years
of exposure; the mean duration of pesticide exposure was
8.0 � 4.8 years. A dose-response relationship between
duration of exposure (measured in years) and BNMN fre-
quency was not observed in our study, although the specific
concentrations of pesticides to which the seasonal agricul-
tural women were exposed is uncertain.
Table VI summarizes the cytogenetic variables for both
control and exposed subjects. The mean BNMN frequen-
cies for the control and exposed groups were 9.93 and
36.93, respectively, and the frequencies of MNL were
10.90 and 42.89. Statistical analysis indicated that these
differences were significant (P < 0.01, Mann-Whitney
U-test). A significant decrease was observed in the CBPI
of the exposed women (P ¼ 0.005).
DISCUSSION
We have studied a group of agricultural women work-
ers from the VIII Region of Bıo-Bıo, Chile, in order to
TABLE IV. Individual MN Frequencies for the Exposed Groupand Years of Exposure
Subjects Years of exposure BNMN/1,000 cells MNL/1,000 cells
E-1 6 25 30
E-2 16 31 39
E-3 9 31 35
E-4 3 28 31
E-5 7 21 23
E-6 11 25 25
E-7 2 44 53
E-8 4 34 37
E-9 10 13 13
E-10 3 39 43
E-11 4 25 26
E-12 9 55 64
E-13 7 36 39
E-14 8 30 36
E-15 12 43 49
E-16 7 39 42
E-17 7 62 69
E-18 10 24 27
E-19 9 33 41
E-20 6 24 26
E-21 8 56 64
E-22 6 44 59
E-23 7 9 9
E-24 12 37 46
E-25 7 20 21
E-26 16 31 38
E-27 5 30 33
E-28 2 46 56
E-29 15 27 33
E-30 5 40 45
E-31 3 16 22
E-32 12 47 51
E-33 10 40 44
E-34 7 59 76
E-35 7 19 22
E-36 7 42 55
E-37 19 45 57
E-38 7 26 33
E-39 13 11 12
E-40 6 43 50
E-41 12 53 61
E-42 7 28 32
E-43 18 79 101
E-44 6 61 74
E-45 1 35 43
E-46 18 37 38
E-47 5 59 74
E-48 5 31 38
E-49 2 26 28
E-50 8 16 17
E-51 4 65 76
E-52 2 23 25
E-53 9 46 50
E-54 2 48 54
E-55 18 45 55
E-56 3 33 39
E-57 3 45 55
E-58 13 68 89
E-59 3 37 45
E-60 20 50 60
E-61 4 49 61
E-62 10 68 80
E-63 2 36 44
E-64 10 65 71
TABLE V. Individual MN Frequencies for the Control Group
Subjects BNMN/1,000 cells MNL/1,000 cells
C-1 6 7
C-2 7 7
C-3 2 2
C-4 10 10
C-5 7 8
C-6 21 25
C-7 10 10
C-8 9 10
C-9 13 14
C-10 4 4
C-11 5 5
C-12 2 2
C-13 7 8
C-14 5 7
C-15 13 14
C-16 9 11
C-17 5 5
C-18 10 10
C-19 4 4
C-20 8 8
C-21 15 15
C-22 7 7
C-23 19 23
C-24 6 7
C-25 23 25
C-26 6 6
C-27 14 15
C-28 17 18
C-29 26 29
C-30 8 11
4 Ma¤ rquez et al.
![Page 5: Cytogenetic damage in female Chilean agricultural workers exposed to mixtures of pesticides](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020402/5750046a1a28ab11489ea1f5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
evaluate associations between pesticide exposure and
cytogenetic damage. The exposed group of agricultural
workers was potentially exposed during the 5-month
season to a complex mixture of different pesticides,
including insecticides, fungicides, and herbicides. These
chemicals include compounds with known genotoxic
properties. For instance, the pesticides most often used
were carbamates, organophosphates, and pyrethroids,
which are genotoxic in both bacterial and mammalian
systems [Bolognesi, 2003]. Given the complex exposure
to a large number of compounds, it was not possible to
predict whether the overall effect was clastogenic or
aneugenic without carrying out fluorescent in situ hybridi-
zation (FISH) with centromeric probes. It has been postu-
lated that exposure to mixtures of pesticides induces
chromosomal aberrations such as acentric fragments and
dicentrics, as well as aneuploidy [Garaj-Vrhovac and
Zeljezic, 2001].
In the present study, age influenced BNMN frequency
in the exposed as well as the control group. These results
confirm the findings of other authors who identified age
as an important variable that influences the baseline MN
frequency [Fenech and Morley, 1991; Migliore et al.,
1991; Barale et al., 1998]. When we analyzed the slope
of the lines in Figure 2, the difference in slopes for the
two groups confirmed the presence of an additive effect
of exposure and age in the exposed group.
No correlation was found between smoking habits and
BNMN frequency in our population, which is also in
agreement with other published reports [Pitarque et al.,
1996; Bukvic et al., 2001; Bonassi et al., 2003].
Our findings indicate that the exposed worker popula-
tion from Bıo-Bıo, Chile, had a significant increase in the
cytogenetic damage in their peripheral blood lympho-
cytes. There was a significant increase in the frequency
of BNMN. There was also a decrease in the CBPI of the
exposed group, suggesting that the agricultural women
workers were exposed to chemicals with cytotoxic prop-
erties, which affected the cell proliferation kinetics
[Pastor et al., 2002]. The fact that these positive
responses in the exposed workers were detected several
weeks after the last known exposure to pesticides sug-
gests that the damage produced in the lymphocytes was
relatively persistent.
There are conflicting reports in the literature about the
effect of pesticide exposure on human populations, which
may reflect the exposure conditions of the particular
study population. Both positive associations between
chromosome damage and pesticide exposure [Falck et al.,
1991; Bolognesi et al., 1993, 2002; Gomez-Arroyo et al.,
2000; Shaham et al., 2001] and negative associations
[Davies et al., 1998; Pastor et al., 2001, 2002] have been
reported. These conflicting responses to pesticide expo-
sure may at least in part be due to the use of protective
clothing and devices, especially during reentry activities,
in the studies with negative associations. This conclusion
is consistent with data indicating increased cytogenetic
damage in work environments where no protective mea-
sures were taken [Rupa et al., 1989; Kourakis et al.,
1992; Lander and Ronne, 1995] and no increase in geno-
toxicity where protective equipment was used [Pastor
et al., 2002]. De Cock et al. [1996] found that application
and reentry activities in the fruit-growing industry
resulted in significant dermal exposure. We consider der-
mal exposure to be the main route in our study popula-
tion, and, apart from their regular clothing, our
population did not use protective equipment (e.g., gloves)
to prevent dermal exposure.
Some studies have reported that continuous exposure to
pesticide mixtures results in cumulative increases in chro-
mosomal damage [Carbonell et al., 1993; Davies et al.,
1998]. A major problem in interpreting biomonitoring
studies is estimating the degree of exposure. The varia-
tion in the degree of exposure and the use of different
chemical mixtures may be a reason for conflicting results
between studies. Exposure to pesticides can be quite spe-
cific for a particular population because each population
has different lifestyles, climatic conditions, and employs
different cultivation methods and uses different mixtures
of pesticides [Bolognesi et al., 2002]. The fact that a
length of exposure-response relationship was not found in
our study could be due to the practice in Chile of chang-
ing the type of job performed by agricultural women
workers each season that they work.
Exposure to pesticides may also have a role in the
induction of congenital malformations [Bolognesi, 2003].
Fig. 3. BNMN frequencies of exposed workers and controls.
Cytogenetic Damage 5
![Page 6: Cytogenetic damage in female Chilean agricultural workers exposed to mixtures of pesticides](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020402/5750046a1a28ab11489ea1f5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
This is of particular interest since our study population
consisted mostly of women of reproductive age. A recent
study in Rancagua, Chile, showed a positive association
between pesticide exposure and congenital malformations
[Rojas et al., 2000].
In summary, our results confirm an association between
cytogenetic damage and occupational exposure to pesti-
cides. Cytogenetic damage may be viewed as an early
biological effect of a chemical insult; consequently, it
could be an indicator for future development of diseases
such as cancer and congenital malformations [Wesseling,
2003]. Our analysis suggests that the creation of educa-
tional programs that instruct seasonal agricultural workers
on the use of protective measures and safe agricultural
practices may decrease the risks associated with pesticide
exposure in the farming populations of developing
countries.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank E. Spano for her expert technical
assistance in the preparation of samples and Professor
R. Naveas for her statistical advice. They also thank the
Health Service of Nuble and Los Angeles and the
National Women’s Service.
REFERENCES
Barale R, Chelotti L, Davini T, Del Ry S, Andreassi MG, Ballardin M,
Bulleri M, He J, Baldacci S, Di Pede F, Gemignani F, Landi S.
1998. Sister chromatid exchange and micronucleus frequency in
human lymphocytes of 1.650 subjects in an Italian population: II,
contribution of sex, age and lifestyle. Environ Mol Mutagen
31:228–242.
Bolognesi C, Parrini M, Bonassi S, Ianello G, Salanitto A. 1993. Cyto-
genetic analysis of a human population occupationally exposed
to pesticides. Mutat Res 285:239–249.
Bolognesi C, Perrone E, Landini E. 2002. Micronucleus monitoring of a
floriculturist population from west Liguria, Italy. Mutagenesis
17:391–397.
Bolognesi C. 2003. Genotoxicity of pesticides. Mutat Res 543:251–272.
Bonassi S, Neri M, Lando C, Ceppi M, Lin Y, Chang W, Holland N,
Kirsh-Voldres M, Zeiger E, Fenech M. 2003. Effect of smoking
habit on the frequency of micronuclei in human lymphocytes:
results from the human micronucleus project. Mutat Res
543:155–166.
Bukvic N, Gentile G, Susca F, Fanelli M, Serio G, Buonadonna L,
Carpuso A, Guanti G. 2001. Sex chromosome loss, micronuclei,
sister chromatid exchange and aging: a study including 16 cente-
narians. Mutat Res 498:159–167.
Carbonell E, Puig F, Xamena N, Creus A, Marcos R. 1990. Sister chro-
matid exchange in lymphocytes of agricultural workers exposed
to pesticides. Mutagenesis 5:403–405.
Carbonell E, Xamena N, Creus A, Marcos R. 1993. Cytogenetic bio-
monitoring in a Spanish group of agricultural workers exposed to
pesticides. Mutagenesis 8:511–517.
Daniels JI, Olsha AR, Savitz DA. 1997. Pesticides and childhood can-
cers. Environ Health Perspect 105:1068–1077.
Davies HW, Kennedy SM, Teshke K, Quintana PJE. 1998. Cytogenetic
analysis of South Asian berry pickers in British Columbia using
the micronucleus assay in peripheral lymphocytes. Mutat Res
416:101–113.
De Cock J, Kromhout H, Heederick D, Burema J. 1996. Experts’ subjec-
tive assessment of pesticide exposure in fruit growing. Scand J
Work Environ Health 22:425–432.
De Ferrari M, Artuso M, Bonassi S, Bonatti S, Cavalieri Z, Pescatore D,
Marchini E, Pisano V, Abbondandolo A. 1991. Cytogenetic bio-
monitoring of an Italian population exposed to pesticides: chro-
mosome aberrations and sister-chromatid exchange analysis in
peripheral blood lymphocytes. Mutat Res 260:205–218.
Dulout FN, Pastori MC, Gonzalez-Cid M, Loria D, Matos E, Sobel N,
de Bujan EC, Albiano N. 1985. Sister-chromatid exchanges and
chromosomal aberrations in a population exposed to pesticides.
Mutat Res 143:237–244.
Falck GCM, Hirnoven A, Scarpato R, Saarokoski ST, Migliore L,
Norppa H. 1991. Micronuclei in blood lymphocytes and genetic
polymorphism for GSTM1, GSTT1 and NAT2 in pesticide-
exposed greenhouse workers. Mutat Res 441:225–237.
Fenech M, Morley A. 1991. Cytokinesis-block micronucleus method in
lymphocytes: effect of in vivo aging and low X-irradiation. Mutat
Res 161:193–198.
Fenech M. 2000. The in vitro micronucleus technique. Mutat Res
455:81–95.
Forget G, Goodman T, de Villiers A. 1993. Impact of pesticide use on
health in developing countries. Ottawa, Canada: International
Development Research Center.
Garaj-Vrhovac V, Zeljezic D. 2001. Cytogenetic monitoring of Croatian
population occupationally exposed to a complex mixture of pesti-
cides. Toxicology 165:153–162.
Garcıa MA, Weigert G, Duk S, Alarcon M. 1999. Chromosome aberra-
tions study in human lymphocytes from marijuana smokers. Bull
Environ Cont Toxicol 62:117–121.
Gomez-Arroyo S, Dıaz-Sanchez Y, Meneses-Perez MA, Villalobos-
Pietrini R, De Leon-Rodrıguez J. 2000. Cytogenetic biomonitor-
ing in a Mexican floriculture worker group exposed to pesticides.
Mutat Res 466:117–124.
TABLE VI. Cytogenetic Variables for the Exposed and Control Populationsa
Control Exposed
Endpoint n Mean � SD Median (range) n Mean � SD Median (range)
BNMN 30 9.93 � 6.17 8 (2–25) 64 36.94 � 14.47 37 (9–79)
MNL 10.90 � 7.01 9 (2–29) 42.89 � 17.72 43 (9–101)
CBPI 2.01 � 0.31 2.02 (1.08–2.38) 1.84 � 0.12 1.83 (1.62–2.09)
aData from scoring 1,000 binucleated cells per donor for BNMN and MNL; CBPI calculated from 500 cells.
6 Ma¤ rquez et al.
![Page 7: Cytogenetic damage in female Chilean agricultural workers exposed to mixtures of pesticides](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020402/5750046a1a28ab11489ea1f5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Ji BT, Silverman DT, Steward PA, Blair A, Swanson GM, Baris D,
Greenberg RD, Hayes R, Brown LM, Lillemoe KD, Schoenberg JB,
Pottern LM, Schwartz AG, Hoover RN. 2001. Occupational expo-
sure to pesticides and pancreatic cancer. Am J Ind Med 40:225–226.
Kourakis A, Mouratidou M, Kokkinos G, Barbouti A, Kotsis A,
Mourelatos D, Dozi-Vassiliades J. 1992. Frequencies of chromo-
somal aberrations in pesticide sprayers working in plastic green
houses. Mutat Res 279:145–148.
Lander F, Ronne M. 1995. Frequency of sister chromatid exchange and
hematological effects in pesticide-exposed greenhouse sprayers.
Scand J Work Environ Health 21:283–288.
Lucero L, Pastor, S, Suarez S, Durban R, Gomez C, Parron T, Creus A,
Marcos R. 2000. Cytogenetic biomonitoring of Spanish green-
house workers exposed to pesticides: micronuclei analysis in per-
ipheral blood lymphocytes and buccal epithelial cells. Mutat Res
464:255–262.
Migliore L, Parrini M, Sbrana I, Battaglia A, Loprieno N. 1991. Micronu-
cleated lympocytes in people occupationally exposed to potential
environmental contaminants: the age effect. Mutat Res 256:13–20.
Pastor S, Gutierrez S, Creus A, Xamena N, Piperakis S, Marcos R.
2001. Cytogenetic analysis of Greek farmers using the micronu-
cleus assay in peripheral lymphocytes and buccal cells. Mutagen-
esis 16:539–545.
Pastor S, Lucero L, Gutierrez S, Durban R, Gomez C, Parron T,
Creus A, Marcos R. 2002. A follow-up study on micronucleus
frequency in Spanish agricultural workers exposed to pesticides.
Mutagenesis 17:79–82.
Pitarque M, Carbonell E, Lapena N, Marsa N, Torres M, Creus A,
Xamena N, Marcos R. 1996. No increase in micronuclei fre-
quency in cultured blood lymphocytes from a group of filling
station attendants. Mutat Res 367:161–167.
Rojas A, Ojeda ME, Barraza X. 2000. Congenital malformations and
pesticide exposure. Rev Med Chile 128:399–404.
Rupa DS, Reddy PP, Reddi OS. 1989. Analysis of sister-chromatid
exchanges, cell kinetics and mitotic index in lymphocytes of
smoking pesticide sprayers. Mutat Res 223:253–258.
Scarpato R, Migliore L, Angotzi G, Fedi A, Miligi L, Loprieno N. 1996.
Cytogenetic monitoring of a group of Italian floriculturist: no evi-
dence of DNA damage related to pesticide exposure. Mutat Res
367:73–82.
Shaham J, Kaufman Z, Gurvich R, Levi Z. 2001. Frequency of sister-
chromatid exchange among greenhouse farmers exposed to pesti-
cides. Mutat Res 491:71–80.
Tucker JD, Preston RJ. 1996. Chromosome aberrations, micronuclei,
aneuploidy, sister chromatid exchanges, and cancer risk assess-
ment. Mutat Res 365:147–159.
Venegas W, Zapata I, Carbonell E, Marcos R. 1998. Micronuclei analy-
sis of pesticide sprayers from Concepcion Chile. Teratogenesis,
Carcinogenesis and Mutagenesis 18:123–129.
Viel JF, Chalier B. 1995. Bladder cancer among French farmers: does
exposure to pesticide vineyards play a part? Occup Environ Med
52:587–592.
Wesseling C. Parra M, Elgstrand K. 1998. Fruit production, pesticides,
and the health of women workers. Int Report IDC 4. National
Institute for Working Life. International Development Coopera-
tion. S-17184. Solna, Sweden.
Wesseling C. 2003. Pesticide control in Latin America: not a challenge
but a myth. Symposium on occupational health equity and devel-
opment in Latin America and the Caribbean. ICOH’s 27th World
Congress. Iguassu, Brasil. February 2003. Document prepared for
Interamerican Development Bank.
Zuskin E, Schachter EN, Mustajbegovic J. 1993. Respiratory function in
greenhouse workers. Int Arch Environ Health 64:521–552.
Accepted by—S. Galloway
Cytogenetic Damage 7