cutting budgets with results based accountability
DESCRIPTION
Cutting budgets with results based accountability v4TRANSCRIPT
CUTTING BUDGETS with RBABetter Decision-making. Greater Public Confidence.
The Fiscal Policy Studies Institute
Websitesraguide.org
resultsaccountability.com
Book - DVD Ordersamazon.com
resultsleadership.org
GENERATE ANALYZE DECIDE
GENERATE ANALYZE DECIDE
CUTTING BUDGETS with RBA
GENERATE: Traditional Methods
2. Across the board x% GF cut (w buy-back?)* 3. Program by program & line by line: admin - new/not started - reduce # served - reduce quality – cut provider(s) – cut entire service
5. Targeting matrix: non-mandated programs, low impact on life, health and safety
1. Darts
Mandated Non-Mandated
Low
Med
ium
Hig
h
LIfe
– H
ealth
- Sa
fety
ProtectDeep end
CutPrevention
Infrastructure
4. Revenue and restructuring: taxes – fees – reserves - incentives - investments
Better Decision-making. Greater Public Confidence.
*GF means General or Discretionary Funds. Buy-back means cutting more than needed and inviting re-application for over-cut funding.
GENERATE ANALYZE DECIDE
CUTTING BUDGETS with RBA
GENERATE: Traditional Methods
2. Across the board x% GF cut (w buy-back?) 3. Program by program – reduce # served – reduce quality – cut provider(s) – cut service entirely
5. Targeting matrix: non-mandated programs, low impact on life, health and safety
1. Darts
6. Least harm: to quality of life and service performance
Plus RBA Methods
4. Revenue and restructuring: taxes – fees – incentives - investments
Better Decision-making. Greater Public Confidence.
Quality of Life
As measuredby results & indicators
Program PerformanceHow muchdid we do?
How well did we do it?
Is anyone better off?
GENERATE ANALYZE DECIDE
CUTTING BUDGETS with RBA
ANALYZE: Traditional Methods1. Triage: a. Politically feasible (winners-losers, press, geography) b. Administratively feasible (legal, implementable)
2. Impact: a. Financial Impact GF Fund savings, Loss of matching funds (if any) Cost shifting / offsetting costs (if any) b. People Impact
Better Decision-making. Greater Public Confidence.
GENERATE ANALYZE DECIDE
CUTTING BUDGETS with RBA
ANALYZE: Traditional Methods1. Triage: a. Politically feasible (winners-losers, press, geography) b. Administratively feasible
2. Impact: a. Financial Impact Disc. Fund savings, Loss of matching funds (if any) Cost shifting / offsetting costs (if any)
Plus RBA Methods
b. Population Quality of Life Impact: on key indicatorsc. Performance Impact: on How much did we do? How well did we do it? Is anyone better off? measures
Better Decision-making. Greater Public Confidence.
GENERATE ANALYZE DECIDE
CUTTING BUDGETS with RBA
DECIDE: Traditional Methods1. Darts2. Political self interest3. Public good
Better Decision-making. Greater Public Confidence.
GENERATE ANALYZE DECIDE
CUTTING BUDGETS with RBA
DECIDE: Traditional Methods1. Darts2. Political self interest3. Public good
Plus RBA Methods
a. Impact on quality of life b. Impact on the performance of key services
Better Decision-making. Greater Public Confidence.
GENERATE ANALYZE DECIDE
CUTTING BUDGETS with RBA
6. Least harm: to quality of life and service performance
2. Impact b. Population Quality of Life Impact: on key indicators c. Performance Impact: on How much did we do? How well did we do it? Is anyone better off? measures
Better Decision-making. Greater Public Confidence.
3. Public good a. Impact on quality of life b. Impact on the performance of key services
What’s different?
The Fiscal Policy Studies Institute
Websitesraguide.org
resultsaccountability.com
Book - DVD Ordersamazon.com
resultsleadership.org
THANKS !And Good Luck !
The Fiscal Policy Studies Institute
Websitesraguide.org
resultsaccountability.com
Book - DVD Ordersamazon.com
resultsleadership.org
THANKS !And Good Luck !