cus satisfaction

Upload: sakthi-kumar

Post on 10-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    1/86

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    2/86

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    3/86

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    4/86

    6 . Anticipate Your Client's Needs & Go Out Of Your Way to Help Them Out

    Sometimes this is easier said than done! However, achieving this supreme level of understanding

    with your clients will do wonders for your working relationship.

    Take this as an example: you're working on the front-end for your client's exciting newecommerce endeavour. You have all the images, originals and files backed up on your desktop

    computer and the site is going really well. During a meeting with your client he/she happens to

    mention a hard-copy brochure their internal marketing people are developing. As if by magic, a

    couple of weeks later a CD-ROM arrives on their doorstep complete with high resolution

    versions of all the images you've used on the site. A note accompanies it which reads:

    "Hi, you mentioned a hard-copy brochure you were working on and I wanted to provide you withlarge-scale copies of the graphics I've used on the site. Hopefully you'll be able to make use of

    some in your brochure."

    Your client is heartily impressed, and remarks to his colleagues and friends how very helpful and

    considerate his Web designers are. Meanwhile, in your office, you lay back in your chair

    drinking your 7th cup of coffee that morning, safe in the knowledge this happy customer will

    send several referrals your way.

    7. Honour Your Promises

    It's possible this is the most important point in this article. The simple message: when you

    promise something, deliver. The most common example here is project delivery dates.Clients don't like to be disappointed. Sometimes, something may not get done, or you might miss

    a deadline through no fault of your own. Projects can be late, technology can fail and sub-

    contractors don't always deliver on time. In this case a quick apology and assurance it'll be ready

    ASAP wouldn't go amiss.

    Conclusion

    Customer service, like any aspect of business, is a practiced art that takes time and effort to

    master. All you need to do to achieve this is to stop and switch roles with the customer. What

    would you want from your business if you were the client? How would you want to be treated?

    Treat your customers like your friends and they'll always come back.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    5/86

    INDUSTRY PROFILE

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    6/86

    The Service sector of the economy is one of the three economic sectors, the others being the

    secondary sector (approximately manufacturing) and the primary sector (extraction such as

    mining, agriculture and fishing). Sometimes an additional sector, the "quaternary sector", is

    defined for the sharing of information.

    The tertiary sector is defined by exclusion of the two other sectors. Services are defined in

    conventional economic literature as "intangible goods".

    The tertiary sector of economy involves the provision of services to businesses as well as

    final consumers. Services may involve the transport, distribution and sale of goods from

    producer to a consumer as may happen in wholesaling and retailing, or may involve the

    provision of a service, such as in pest control or entertainment. Goods may be transformed in the

    process of providing a service, as happens in the restaurant industry or in equipment repair.

    However, the focus is on people interacting with people and serving the customer rather than

    transforming physical goods.

    Service Industry

    The service sector consists of the "soft" parts of the economy such as insurance,

    government, tourism, banking, retail, education, and social services. In soft-sector employment,

    people use time to deploy knowledge assets, collaboration assets, and process-engagement to

    create productivity (effectiveness), performance improvement potential (potential) and

    sustainability. The tertiary sector is the most common workplace.

    Typically the output of this sector is content (information), service, attention, advice,

    experiences, and/or discussion (also known as "intangible goods"). Other examples of service

    sector employment include:

    y F ranchising

    y News media

    y Hospitality industry (e.g. restaurants, hotels, casinos)

    y Consulting

    y L egal practice

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    7/86

    y Healthcare/hospitals

    y Waste disposal

    y Real estate

    y Personal services

    y Business services

    Public utilities are often considered part of the tertiary sector as they provide services

    to people, while creating the utility's infrastructure is often considered part of the secondary

    sector, even though the same business may be involved in both aspects of the operation.

    To do fact-based work in this area it is necessary to utilize the extensive data collection

    that takes place using classification systems such as the United Nations International Standard

    Industrial Classification standard, the United States' Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code

    system and its new replacement, the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS),

    and similar systems in the EU and elsewhere.

    The term service economy, in contrast, refers to a model wherein as much economic

    activity as possible is treated as a service. F or example IBM treats its business as a service

    business. Although it still manufactures high-end computers, it sees the physical goods as a small

    part of the "business solutions" industry. They have found that the price elasticity of demand for "business solutions" is much less than that for hardware. There has been a corresponding shift to

    a subscription pricing model. Rather than receiving a single payment for a piece of manufactured

    equipment, many manufacturers are now receiving a steady stream of revenue for ongoing

    contracts.

    Theory of progression

    Economies tend to follow a developmental progression that takes them from a heavyreliance on agriculture and mining, toward the development of manufacturing (e.g. automobiles,

    textiles, and shipbuilding, steel) and finally toward a more service based structure. Whereas the

    first economy to follow this path in the modern world was the United Kingdom, the speed at

    which other economies have later made the transition to service-based, sometimes called post-

    industrial, has accelerated over time.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    8/86

    Historically, manufacturing tended to be more open to international trade and

    competition than services. As a result, there has been a tendency for the first economies to

    industrialize to come under competitive attack by those seeking to industrialize

    e.g. because production, especially labour , costs are lower in those industrializing later. The

    resultant shrinkage of manufacturing in the leading economies might explain their growing

    reliance on the service sector.

    However, currently and prospectively, with dramatic cost reduction and speed and

    reliability improvements in the transportation of people and the communication of information,

    the service sector now includes some of the most intensive international competition, despite

    residual protectionism.

    I ssues for service providers

    Service providers face obstacles selling services that goods-sellers rarely face. Services

    are not tangible, making it difficult for potential customers to understand what they will receive

    and what value it will hold for them. Indeed some, such as consulting and investment services,

    offer no guarantees of the value for price paid.

    Since the quality of most services depends largely on the quality of the individuals

    providing the services, it is true that "people costs" are a high component of service costs.

    Whereas a manufacturer may use technology, simplification, and other techniques to lower the

    cost of goods sold, the service provider often faces an unrelenting pattern of increasing costs.

    Differentiation is often difficult. How does one choose one investment adviser over

    another, since they (and hotel providers, leisure companies, and consultants, as well as many

    others) often seem to provide identical services? Charging a premium for services is usually an

    option only for the most established firms, who charge extra based upon brand recognition.

    Industrial Policy

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    9/86

    An industrial policy is any government regulation or law that encourages the ongoing

    operation of, or investment in, a particular industry.

    An active intervention in industrial development is the policy of most if not all

    countries in the world. Even the United States, which prides itself as a "free-trading" nation, has

    implemented strong tax, tariff, and trade laws to protect itself from "dumping", the flooding of a

    market by a competing nation with goods or services below market prices in order to gain an

    advantage over domestic firms.

    In Japan, the powerful MITI has often taken an active hand in development of major

    industries, particularly electronics and software. The impact of this intervention is disputed but

    the role of 'Industrial Policy in the 'East Asian Miracle' is now more generally accepted since the

    Japanese model was successfully imitated by South Korea and Taiwan, which similarly

    developed advanced industrial sectors and enjoyed similar advances in living standards.

    Authors such as Robert Hunter Wade in 'Governing the Market', provide arguments to

    support the link between government intervention and the successful industrial development in

    this region. Benefits from foreign investment such as the transfer of technology, skills and

    managerial techniques that could help infant industries become internationally competitive were

    captured using policies such as local content rules and joint-venture regulations.

    As such, the development of infant industries does not simply involve protectionism as

    the infant industry argument suggests, but is dependent on a country's ability to learn directly

    from foreign direct investment. Such policies have traditionally been central to the industrial

    policies of countries that are attempting to catch up with technologically and economically more

    advanced states.

    A good example is the US and European attempt to catch up with Great Britain during

    the 18th and 19th century. Many of these domestic policy choices are now prohibited by the

    WTO Agreement on Trade Related Investment Measures.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    10/86

    However, notable exceptions including agricultural subsidies in both Europe and

    the US, and cultural subsidies in Canada, prove that the principle of industrial policy is alive and

    well, and merely retreating into the shadows.

    Education and training:

    An interdisciplinary background is appropriate in this field, a combination of courses in the

    social sciences, business, and behavioral sciences is useful. Some jobs may require a more technical or

    specialized background in engineering, science, finance, or law, for example. Most prospective human

    resources specialists should take courses in compensation, recruitment, training and development, and

    performance appraisal, as well as courses in principles of management, organizational structure, and

    industrial psychology. Other relevant courses include business administration, public administration,

    psychology, sociology, political science, economics, and statistics. Courses in labor law, collective

    bargaining, labor economics, labor history, and industrial psychology also provide a valuable

    background for the prospective labor relations specialist. As in many other fields, knowledge of

    computers and information systems also is useful.

    The duties given to entry-level workers will vary, depending on whether the new workers have a

    degree in human resource management, have completed an internship, or have some other type of

    human resources-related experience. Entry-level employees commonly learn the profession by

    performing administrative dutieshelping to enter data into computer systems, compiling employeehandbooks, researching information for a supervisor, or answering the phone and handling routine

    questions. Entry-level workers often enter formal or on-the-job training programs in which they learn

    how to classify jobs, interview applicants, or administer employee benefits. They then are assigned to

    specific areas in the human resources department to gain experience.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    11/86

    COMPANY PROFILE

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    12/86

    SANS INNOVATIONS is a fast growing company providing end-to-end business solutions

    globally. It is our constant endeavor that we satisfy our clients through our comprehensive

    portfolio of services which includes IT Services, Web Services, and Training & HR Services.

    SANS INNOVATIONS is committed to technology innovation and adoption of latest

    tools and products to provide excellent solutions to its customers. The strong belief of providing

    end-to-end IT services and assisting companies to receive information anywhere, anytime in the

    most efficient format has led to the complete satisfaction from the clients of SANS

    INNOVATIONS.

    MISSION SANS INNOVATIONS wants to be a dependable world-class organization. We shall

    foster the spirit of entrepreneurship within the organization through individual development. Our

    endeavor is to provide our national and international customers with competitive solutions. We

    shall achieve this Quality Service by comprehending their need through close interaction and by

    creating a global network.

    VISION

    Being a trustworthy, customer oriented organization,

    An open and warm environment where everyone is respected, listened to

    Encouraged to excel,

    Actively creating and exploring opportunity for the growth of our customers and our

    organization.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    13/86

    Training

    SANS INNOVATIONS has been conceived with the objective of increasing

    employability through developing skills and competencies for aspirants fresh, experienced

    that are geared up towards accomplishing their exciting career goal.

    The basic business model of SANS INNOVATIONS training is to identify and

    understand the manpower across industry verticals; determine the gaps between the employer

    needs and existing talent pool and then design, develop and deliver programmes to bridge the

    gaps.

    In a nutshell SANS INNOVATIONSs core competencies comprise the ability and

    competency to deliver high quality need-based training various customized solutions arrived by

    our panel of experienced professionals across industry verticals to provide Industry orientedtraining.

    Our core competencies:

    1) Institutional Training

    2) Corporate Training

    Our Verticals:

    y Information Technology (IT)

    y ITES

    y Banking & F inancial Services(B F SI)

    y Engineering & Manufacturing

    y Energy & Infrastructure

    y Retail & F MCG

    y Media & Entertainments

    Software Consulting

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    14/86

    Most of the management are under pressure to make sure technology investments

    improve their company's competitive position and boost the bottom line. With global sourcing of

    IT emerging as a highly effective option for achieving these goals, many organizations are

    implementing a new methodology, to select and manage a IT offshore service vendors. Several

    companies have chosen SANS INNOVATIONS as a strategic partner to help them manage key

    areas of IT, due to our deep capabilities in industry verticals, technical strengths and innovative,

    flexible service delivery.

    SANS INNOVATIONS's integrated network of developed facilities is complemented by

    onsite, offshore and near shore capabilities in major international markets. This has helped our

    clients choose solutions that meet their global sourcing needs.

    SANS INNOVATIONS has helped clients meet their global sourcing needs by helping

    them identify, evaluate and configure their IT architectures across multiple geographies to reduce

    costs, mitigate risks and maximize performance.

    With excellent technical skills and many years of experience in delivering end-to-end IT

    services and solutions, SANS INNOVATIONS has developed strong domain capabilities in the

    following industry verticals:

    y Insurance

    y F inancial Services

    y Manufacturing

    y Telecom

    y Engineering Services

    Web Services

    SANS INNOVATIONS provides custom website services including website design and

    development, consulting and maintenance services regardless of the work complexity. Our

    highly-skilled developers and programmers accomplish various site development projects from

    the ground up, based on up-to-date programming languages.

    Our extensive experience in development applied to our hands-on expertise will help

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    15/86

    you to establish your Internet presence and put your website on a professional level. Offerings:

    y Website Development

    y Content Management

    y Database Driven Portals

    Event Management

    We recognize and cater to the fact that events are a major aspect of corporate

    marketing strategy. We design and conceptualize various events bearing in mind the profileof the client, the image of the brand, the target audience and the mileage that the event will

    generate for the client

    We conceptualize the deliver effective, recall intensive solutions to communicate

    the brand's proposition to its target group through below-the-line activities. We go a step

    further and generate the requisite feedback through the activity from the brand's target group.

    SANS INNOVATIONS Events operates in order to provide an exhaustive event

    management proposition an that encompasses marketing consulting rather than simply event

    conceptualization, designing, planning, & execution of the events & promotions

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    16/86

    RESEARCH

    METHODOLOGY

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    17/86

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    18/86

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    19/86

    NEED, OBJECTIVES AND LIMITATIONS

    2.1 NEED FOR THE STUDY

    Customers expectations change accordingly with time. Customers expectations

    should be studied with great efforts, so that marketers can design the product based on

    the need of the customers.

    If the customers need were met then the customer may turn as an asset to the

    company because they become opinion leader for others. So that the company can

    increase its market share.

    Customer expectation is mainly based on the following attributes

    The product or service

    The price

    The place

    Promotion

    In this new era of business world, Customers are the real owners. So, each and

    every expectations of consumers have to be studied.

    ADVANTAGES:-

    To increase the market share

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    20/86

    To remove consumer dissatisfaction

    To retain the current customers and also gaining by new one through study the

    customer expectations.

    OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

    PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

    The primary objective of the study is to identify the preference

    by the clients and satisfaction level towards the services rendered by SANS

    INNOVATIONS.

    SECONDARY OBJECTIVE

    1. To identify and rank the service features given preference by the clients.

    2. To identify the actual performance and satisfaction level towards various

    various services that was given preference.

    3. To identify the opinion of the customers and their feelings towards theservices.

    4. To suggest some measures to improve customer satisfaction.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    21/86

    REVIEW OF

    LITERATURE

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    22/86

    Improving Customer Satisfaction Once a Customer Satisfaction Measurement Program Is

    in Place

    Customer satisfaction research is not an end unto itself. The purpose, of course, in measuring

    customer satisfaction is to see where a company stands in this regard in the eyes of its customers,thereby enabling service and product improvements which will lead to higher satisfaction levels.

    The research is just one component in the quest to improve customer satisfaction. There are

    many others, including:

    y Top management commitment,y L inking of Customer Satisfaction scores with employee and management monetary

    incentives,y Recognition of employees who contribute to customers' satisfaction,y Identification, measurement, and tracking of operational variables which drive

    satisfaction scores,y Customer-based improvement goals,y Plans for improving operational variables,y Incorporation of customer satisfaction skills into employee training programs,y Measurement of and plans for improvement of employee satisfaction,y Changes in corporate hiring practices.

    We will touch on each of these issues briefly.

    Top Management Commitment

    Top management, through its actions, must show that customer satisfaction is important to it.

    This can be done in several ways.

    y Acknowledging areas where the company needs to improve,y Allocating appropriate resources to the improvement of customer satisfaction,y Involvement of management and employees in the development of plans for customer

    satisfaction improvement,y L inking management bonuses to satisfaction scores,y Clear and frequent communication of what is being done to improve customer

    satisfaction.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    23/86

    y Organizations are increasingly interested in retaining existing customers while targeting

    non-customers; [2] measuring customer satisfaction provides an indication of how

    successful the organization is at providing products and/or services to the marketplace.

    y Customer satisfaction is an ambiguous and abstract concept and the actual manifestation

    of the state of satisfaction will vary from person to person and product/service to

    product/service. The state of satisfaction depends on a number of both psychological and

    physical variables which correlate with satisfaction behaviors such as return and

    recommend rate. The level of satisfaction can also vary depending on other options the

    customer may have and other products against which the customer can compare the

    organization's products.

    y Because satisfaction is basically a psychological state, care should be taken in the effort

    of quantitative measurement, although a large quantity of research in this area hasrecently been developed. Work done by Berry (Bart Allen) and Brodeur between 1990

    and 1998 defined ten 'Quality Values' which influence satisfaction behavior, further

    expanded by Berry in 2002 and known as the ten domains of satisfaction. These ten

    domains of satisfaction include: Quality, Value, Timeliness, Efficiency, Ease of Access,

    Environment, Inter-departmental Teamwork, F ront line Service Behaviors, Commitment

    to the Customer and Innovation. These factors are emphasized for continuous

    improvement and organizational change measurement and are most often utilized to

    develop the architecture for satisfaction measurement as an integrated model. Work done

    by Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry ( L eonard L ) [3] between 1985 and 1988 provides the

    basis for the measurement of customer satisfaction with a service by using the gap

    between the customer's expectation of performance and their perceived experience of

    performance. This provides the measurer with a satisfaction "gap" which is objective and

    quantitative in nature. Work done by Cronin and Taylor propose the

    "confirmation/disconfirmation" theory of combining the "gap" described by Parasuraman,

    Zeithaml and Berry as two different measures (perception and expectation of

    performance) into a single measurement of performance according to expectation.

    According to Garbrand, customer satisfaction equals perception of performance divided

    by expectation of performance.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    24/86

    y The usual measures of customer satisfaction involve a survey [4] with a set of statements

    using a L ikert Technique or scale. The customer is asked to evaluate each statement and

    in term of their perception and expectation of performance of the organization being

    measured.

    Improving Customer Satisfaction Once a Customer Satisfaction Measurement Program Is

    in Place

    Customer satisfaction research is not an end unto itself. The purpose, of course, in measuring

    customer satisfaction is to see where a company stands in this regard in the eyes of its customers,

    thereby enabling service and product improvements which will lead to higher satisfaction levels.

    The research is just one component in the quest to improve customer satisfaction. There are

    many others, including:

    y Top management commitment,y L inking of Customer Satisfaction scores with employee and management monetary

    incentives,y Recognition of employees who contribute to customers' satisfaction,y Identification, measurement, and tracking of operational variables which drive

    satisfaction scores,y Customer-based improvement goals,

    y Plans for improving operational variables,y Incorporation of customer satisfaction skills into employee training programs,y Measurement of and plans for improvement of employee satisfaction,y Changes in corporate hiring practices.

    We will touch on each of these issues briefly.

    Top Management Commitment

    Top management, through its actions, must show that customer satisfaction is important to it.This can be done in several ways.

    y Acknowledging areas where the company needs to improve,y Allocating appropriate resources to the improvement of customer satisfaction,

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    25/86

    y Involvement of management and employees in the development of plans for customer satisfaction improvement,

    y L inking management bonuses to satisfaction scores,y Clear and frequent communication of what is being done to improve customer

    satisfaction.

    Linking of Customer Satisfaction Scores With Employee and Management Monetary

    Incentives

    This really is just a case of having management put its money where its mouth is. Monetary

    incentives for improving customer satisfaction scores should reach all levels of the organization,

    from top management to front-line employees and suppliers. Incentive programs can be

    structured so that all employees in an organizational unit receive compensation if the unit's

    customer satisfaction goals are met. Additionally, exemplary service on the part of individual

    employees can be rewarded on an ad hoc basis. Management incentives do not have to result in

    incremental expenditures; a reallocation of current incentives will suffice. F or example, if 100%

    of a manager's bonus is dependent upon meeting operational and sales goals, the mix could be

    changed to include a customer satisfaction goals.

    Recognition of Employees Who Contribute to Customers' Satisfaction

    This is an inexpensive way to foster customer satisfaction. The keys to success are:

    y Making sure that all employees are aware of why a particular employee is beingrecognized,

    y Making sure that each employee being recognized is worthy of recognition.

    Identification, Measurement, and Tracking of Operational Variables Which Drive

    Satisfaction Scores The results of a customer satisfaction survey need to be evaluated to

    determine what needs to be improved. F or example, a survey may find that customer waiting

    times need to be reduced. The next step should be to quantify actual customer waiting times, andto set goals and strategies for reducing them. Goals should be as specific as possible. It is better

    to say "we want to reduce wait times during peak periods from an average of twenty minutes to

    fifteen minutes by the end of June," than to say "we need to reduce customer waiting times."

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    26/86

    Customer-Based Improvement Goals

    This ties directly to the previous point. Once you have identified what needs to be improved, you

    need to develop a plan for improving each identified area. Such plans need to be based on what

    customers really need, rather than what management believes to be a good goal. Using the previous example, if customers really desire wait times of ten minutes or less, having

    management dictate that wait times must be reduced to fifteen minutes will have limited appeal

    with customers. You may need to do a separate survey with customers to actually set appropriate

    goals. If this is not economically feasible, at least talk to a number of customers and gain their

    input before setting a goal.

    Plans for Improving Operational Variables

    Once you have established what needs to be improved, and how much it needs to be improved,

    plans need to be developed to make improvement happen. The keys to successful planning are

    to:

    y Involve front-line employees and management in the planning process,y Make sure plans are specific,y Evaluate the success of plans once they have been put into place. This is done by

    measuring actual improvement in operations and customer satisfaction.

    Incorporation of Customer Satisfaction Skills into Employee Training Programs

    Employee training programs should be modified to include:

    y A description of the importance of customer satisfaction to the company,y Descriptions of what keeps customers satisfied,y A description of customer satisfaction measurement programs, recognition programs, and

    incentive programs,y

    Specific employee-performance expectations with regard to keeping customers satisfied.

    Measurement of And Plans for Improvement of Employee Satisfaction

    Unhappy employees will have difficulty in keeping customers happy. You should consider

    measuring the satisfaction levels of employees, and then developing action plans to improve

    employee satisfaction.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    27/86

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    28/86

    ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

    Table 4.1: SHOWING GENDER WISE DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENT :

    GENDER NUMBER OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

    Male 56 56

    F emale 44 44

    TOTAL 100 100%

    INFERENCE:

    F rom the above table it is clear that most of the respondent male i.e. 56% and the others are

    female i.e. 44%.

    Figure 4.1: SHOWING PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENT BELONGS TO GENDER

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    29/86

    Table 4.2: SHOWING AGE WISE DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENT

    AGE (YEAR) NUMBER OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

    16 TO 20 35 35

    21 TO 25 42 42

    26 TO 30 23 23

    30 ABOVE 0 0

    TOTAL 100 100%

    INFERENCE:

    F rom the above table it is clear that most of the respondent belongs to the age group of 21 to 25

    i.e. 42%, the second largest age groups are 16 to 20 that is 35% . The third groups are the group

    of experienced person whose age fall between 26 to 30 i.e., 23%. None of the respondent belongs

    to 30 year above as they dont need any training .

    Figure 4.2: SHOWING PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENT BELONG TO AGE GROUP

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    30/86

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    31/86

    Table 4.4: SHOWING THE CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDANTS KNOWLEDGE

    ABOUT SANS INNOVATIONS .

    AWARENESS NUMBER OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

    Seminars 42 42

    Advertisement 23 23

    road shows 12 12

    F riends 23 23

    TOTAL 100 100%

    INTERFERENCE

    F rom the above table it is clear that most of the respondent comes to know about SANS

    INNOVATIONS through seminars i.e. 42%, the second largest respondents come to know

    through advertisement and friends i.e., 23% each. The third group of respondents comes to know

    through road shows i.e., 12%.

    Figure 4.4: SHOWING PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENT OF THEIR INTRODUCTION

    ABOUT SANS INNOVATIONS

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    32/86

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    33/86

    Table 4. 6 : SHOWING THE CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDANTS TYPE OFADVERTISEMENT

    ATTRACTION NUMBER OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

    Media ads 8 20.51%

    Print ads 17 43.59%

    Pamphlets 9 23.08%

    Others 5 12.82%

    TOTAL39

    100%

    INFERENCE:

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    34/86

    F rom the above table it is clear that most of the respondent have seen print ads i.e. 43.59%, the

    second largest respondents have seen pamphlets i.e., 23.08%. The third group of respondents have

    seen media ads i.e., 20.51%.others have seen various other ads i.e., 12.82%.

    Figure 4. 6 : SHOWING PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENT SEEN DIFFERENTCHANNEL OF ADVERTISEMENT OF SANS INNOVATIONS

    Table 4.7: SHOWING THE CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDANTS REASON FOR

    JOINING SANS INNOVATIONS.

    REASON NUMBER OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

    Quality of training 52 52

    Better prospectus 32 32

    Quality trainers 16 16

    TOTAL 100 100%

    INFERENCE:

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    35/86

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    36/86

    TOTAL 100 100%

    INFERENCE:

    From the above table it is clear that most of the respondents are very well satisfied with the courses

    of SANS INNOVATIONS i.e. 48%, the second largest respondents are well satisfied with the

    courses of SANS INNOVATIONS i.e., 43%. The third group of respondents are average level of

    satisfaction i.e., 6%.others are not satisfied with the courses of SANS INNOVATIONS i.e., 3%.

    Figure 4.8: SHOWS THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS LEVEL OFSATISFACTION

    Table 4. 9 : SHOWING THE ATTRACTION OF CUSTOMERS TOWARDS SANS

    INNOVATIONS.

    OFFERS NUMBER OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

    Placement 37 37

    Course material 20 20

    Additional course 30 30

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    37/86

    Others 13 13

    TOTAL 100 100%

    INFERENCE:

    F rom the above table it is clear that most of the respondents are attracted by placements i.e. 37%,

    the second largest respondents are attracted by additional course i.e., 30%. The third groups of

    respondents are attracted by course material i.e., 20%. The last groups of respondents are attracted

    by various other factors i.e. 13%.

    Figure 4. 9 : SHOWS THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS ATTRACTIONTOWARDS SANS INNOVATIONS

    Table 4.10: SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS FEELING SANS

    INNOVATIONS IS BETTER IN FEES

    FEES NUMBER OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

    Highly agree 57 57

    Agree 23 13

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    38/86

    Disagree 12 12

    Highly disagree 8 8

    TOTAL 100 100%

    INFERENCE:

    F rom the above table it is clear that most of the respondents highly agree that SANS

    INNOVATIONS is better in fees i.e. 57%, the second largest respondents agree that SANS

    INNOVATIONS is better in fees i.e.23%. The third largest group of respondents disagree that

    SANS INNOVATIONS is better in fees i.e.12%.The last group of respondents highly disagree that

    SANS INNOVATIONS is better in fees i.e. 8%.

    Figure 4.10: SHOWS THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS FEELING THAT SANSINNOVATIONS IS BETTER IN FEES

    Table 4.11: SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS FEELING SANS

    INNOVATIONS IS BETTER IN COURSE CONTENT

    COURSE CONTENT NUMBER OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    39/86

    Highly agree 56 56

    Agree 23 23

    Disagree 16 16

    Highly disagree 5 5

    TOTAL 100 100%

    INFERENCE:

    F rom the above table it is clear that most of the respondents highly agree that SANS

    INNOVATIONS is better in course content i.e. 56%, the second largest respondents agree that

    SANS INNOVATIONS is better in course content i.e. 23%. The third largest group of respondentsdisagree that SANS INNOVATIONS is better in course content i.e.16%.The last group of

    respondents highly disagree that SANS INNOVATIONS is better in course content i.e. 5%.

    Figure 4.11: SHOWS THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS FEELING THAT SANSINNOVATIONS IS BETTER IN COURSE CONTENT

    Table 4.12: SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS FEELING SANS

    INNOVATIONS TRAINERS ARE BETTER

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    40/86

    TRAINERS NUMBER OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

    Highly agree 46 46

    Agree 18 18Disagree 12 12

    Highly disagree 24 24

    TOTAL 100 100%

    INFERENCE:

    F

    rom the above table it is clear that most of the respondents highly agree that SANSINNOVATIONS trainers are better i.e. 46%, the second largest respondents highly disagree that

    SANS INNOVATIONS trainers are better i.e.24%. The third largest group of respondents agrees

    that SANS INNOVATIONS trainers are better i.e.18%.The last group of respondents disagree that

    SANS INNOVATIONS trainers are better i.e. 12%.

    Figure 4.12: SHOWS THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS FEELING THAT SANSINNOVATIONS TRAINERS ARE BETTER

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    41/86

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    42/86

    Table 4.14: SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF WEAKNESS OF THE

    RESPONDENT.

    WEAKNESS NO OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

    Communication 29 29

    Technical skill 27 27

    L ack of confidence 38 38

    None 6

    TOTAL 100 100%

    INFERENCE

    F rom the above table it is clear that most of the respondents weakness is lack of confidence i.e.

    38%, the second largest respondents weakness is communication skill i.e., 29%. The third groups

    of respondents weakness is technical skill i.e., 27%. The last group of respondents doesnt have

    any weakness i.e. 6%.

    Figure 4.14: SHOWS THE PERCENTAGE OF WEAKNESS OF THE RESPONDENTS

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    43/86

    Table 4.15: SHOWING THE ATTRACTION OF RESPONDANTS TOWARDS

    SPECIAL OFFERINGS

    COMPARISON FACTOR NUMBER OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

    Placement 26 26

    Training fee 20 20

    L ive project 15 15

    Advertisement 39 39

    TOTAL 100 100%

    INFERENCE:

    F rom the above table it is clear that most of the respondents attracted to the advertisement i.e.

    39%, the second largest respondents are attracted to the placement i.e., 26%. The third groups of

    respondents are attracted to the training fee i.e., 20%. The last groups of respondents are attracted

    to the live project i.e. 15%.

    Figure 4.15: SHOWS THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS ATTRACTIONTOWARDS SPECIAL OFFERINGS

    26

    20

    15

    39

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    pl acement tr a ini ng fee l ive proj ect a dver ti sement

    ATTRACTIONS

    N O

    O F R E S P O N D E N

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    44/86

    Table 4.1 6 : SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF THE RESPONDENTS LEVEL OF

    SATISFACTION OF TRAINING PROGRAM

    TRAINING NUMBER OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

    100%-75% 56 56

    74%-50% 32 32

    49%-25% 7 7

    24%-0% 5 5

    TOTAL 100 100%

    INFERENCE:

    F rom the above table it is clear that most of the respondents are satisfied at 100%-75% i.e. 56%,

    the second largest respondents are satisfied at to 74%-50%i.e., 32%. The third group of respondent

    are satisfied at 49%-25% i.e., 7%. The last group of respondents are satisfied at 24%-0% i.e. 5%.

    Figure 4.16: SHOWS THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS SAYTISFACTION ONTRAINING

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    45/86

    Table 4.17: SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS FEELING THAT

    ADVERTISEMENT CAN IMPROVE SANS INNOVATIONS

    ADVERTISEMENT NUMBER OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

    Highly agree 23 23

    Agree 46 46

    Disagree 22 22

    Highly disagree 9 9

    TOTAL 100 100%

    INFERENCE:

    F rom the above table it is clear that most of the respondents agree that advertisement can improve

    SANS INNOVATIONS i.e. 46%, the second largest respondents highly agree that advertisement

    can improve SANS INNOVATIONS i.e.23%. The third largest group of respondents disagree that

    advertisement can improve SANS INNOVATIONS i.e.22%.The last group of respondents highly

    disagree that advertisement can improve SANS INNOVATIONS i.e. 9%.

    Figure 4.17: SHOWS THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS FEELING THAT SANSINNOVATIONS ADVERTISEMENT CAN IMPROVE SANS INNOVATIONS

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    46/86

    Table 4.18: SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS FEELING THAT

    PROVIDING OFFERS CAN IMPROVE SANS INNOVATIONS

    PROVIDING OFFERS NUMBER OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

    highly agree 21 21

    agree 33 33

    disagree 38 38

    highly disagree 8 8

    TOTAL 100 100%

    INFERENCE:

    F rom the above table it is clear that most of the respondents disagree that providing offers can

    improve SANS INNOVATIONS i.e. 38%, the second largest respondents agree that providing

    offers can improve SANS INNOVATIONS i.e.33%. The third largest group of respondents highly

    agrees that providing offers can improve SANS INNOVATIONS i.e.21%.The last group of

    respondents highly disagree that providing offers can improve SANS INNOVATIONS i.e. 8%.

    Figure 4.18: SHOWS THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS FEELING THAT SANSINNOVATIONS PROVIDING OFFERS CAN IMPROVE SANS INNOVATIONS

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    47/86

    Table 4.1 9 : SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS FEELING THAT

    SCHOLARSHIP CAN IMPROVE SANS INNOVATIONS

    SCHOLARSHIP NUMBER OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

    Highly agree 26 26

    Agree 48 48

    Disagree 14 14

    Highly disagree 12 12

    TOTAL 100 100%

    INFERENCE:

    F rom the above table it is clear that most of the respondents agree that scholarship can improve

    SANS INNOVATIONS i.e. 48%, the second largest respondents highly agree that scholarship

    can improve SANS INNOVATIONS i.e.26%. The third largest group of respondents disagrees that

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    48/86

    scholarship can improve SANS INNOVATIONS i.e.14%.The last group of respondents highly

    disagree that scholarship can improve SANS INNOVATIONS i.e. 12%.

    Figure 4.1 9 : SHOWS THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS FEELING THAT SANSINNOVATIONS SCHOLARSHIP CAN IMPROVE SANS INNOVATIONS

    Table 4.20: SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS FEELING THAT

    SEMINARS CAN IMPROVE SANS INNOVATIONS

    SEMINARS NUMBER OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

    Highly agree 24 24Agree 37 37

    Disagree 30 30

    Highly disagree 9 9

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    49/86

    TOTAL 100 100%

    INFERENCE:

    F rom the above table it is clear that most of the respondents agree that seminars can improve

    SANS INNOVATIONS i.e. 37%, the second largest respondents disagree that seminars can

    improve SANS INNOVATIONS i.e.30%. The third largest group of respondents highly agrees that

    seminars can improve SANS INNOVATIONS i.e.24%.The last group of respondents highly

    disagree that seminars can improve SANS INNOVATIONS i.e. 9%.

    Figure 4.20: SHOWS THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS FEELING THAT SANSINNOVATIONS SEMINARS CAN IMPROVE SANS INNOVATIONS

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    50/86

    Table 4.21: SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS SUGGESTION TO

    IMPROVE SANS INNOVATIONS

    NEW OFFERS NUMBER OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

    Installment Scheme 61 61

    Additional Course Package 32 32

    Others 7 7

    TOTAL 100 100%

    INFERENCE:

    F rom the above table it is clear that most of the respondents suggests installment scheme to

    improve SANS INNOVATIONS i.e. 61%, the second largest respondents suggests additional

    course package to improve SANS INNOVATIONS i.e., 32%. The last group of respondents

    suggests others ways to improve SANS INNOVATIONS i.e. 7%.

    Figure 4.21: SHOWS THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS SUGGESTION TOIMPROVE SANS INNOVATIONS

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    51/86

    Table 4.22: SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS FAVOURABLEMODE OF COMMUNICATION

    COMMUNICATION MODE NUMBER OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

    Direct 12 12

    Direct mail 16 16

    Phone 43 43

    E-mail 29 29

    TOTAL 100 100%

    INFERENCE:

    F rom the above table it is clear that most of the respondents favorable mode of communication is

    phone i.e. 43%, the second largest respondents favorable mode of communication is e-mail i.e.,

    29%. The third largest group of respondents favorable mode of communication is direct mail

    i.e.16%.The last group of respondents favorable mode is direct i.e. 12%.

    Figure 4.22: SHOWS THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS FAVORABLE MODEOF COMMUNICATION

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    52/86

    Table 4.2 3 : SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTSMATERIALISATION OF DREAM

    MATERIALISATION OFDREAM NUMBER OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

    Yes 76 76

    No 24

    TOTAL 100 100%

    INFERENCE:

    F rom the above table it is clear that most of the respondents believe that their dreams are

    materialized by SANS INNOVATIONS i.e. 76%. Other group of respondents believes that their

    dreams are not materialized by SANS INNOVATIONS i.e. 24%.

    Figure 4.2 3 : SHOWS THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS MATERIALISATIONOF DREAM.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    53/86

    STATISTICAL TOOLS

    COMPUTAT I ON OF WE IGH TED AVERA G E FOR VAR I OUS ASPECTS T H AT

    I NCREASES T

    H E MARKET S

    H ARE VALUE

    A I M :

    To find the weighted average for various aspects that increases the market share and rank

    them on the basis of weighted average obtained.

    Table 4.24: SHOWING COMPUTATION O F WEIGHTED AVERAGE

    FORMULA USED:

    Weighted Average = FX /N

    Where, FX = fx 1+fx 2+.fx n

    f = F requency

    x = Points allotted for each scale

    Aspects IncreasingMarket Share

    StronglyAgree

    Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree

    WeightedTotal

    WeightedAverage

    Rank

    More Advertisement 23 46 22 9 283 2.83 2

    Providing Offers 21 33 38 8 267 2.67 4

    Scholarship 26 48 14 12 288 2.88 1

    Seminars 24 37 30 9 276 2.76 3

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    54/86

    N = 100

    Points allotted as follows :

    Strongly Agree - 4 points

    Agree - 3 points

    Disagree - 2 points

    Strongly Disagree - 1 point

    INFERENCE:

    F rom the above computation it is found that,

    y Scholarship secures Rank I with the highest weighted average that increases the

    market share value.

    y More Advertisement secures Rank II with second highest weighted average that

    increases the market share.

    y Seminars secure Rank III with third highest weighted average that increases the

    market share.

    y Providing Offers secure Rank IV with the least weighted average that increases the

    market share.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    55/86

    COMPUTATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE FOR VARIOUS ASPECTS OF TRAINING

    THAT SATISFIES THE CUSTOMERS BETTER THAN OTHER TRAINING INSTITUTES

    A I M :

    To find the weighted average for various aspects of training and rank them on the basis of

    weighted average obtained.

    Table 4.25: SHOWING COMPUTATION O F WEIGHTED AVERAGE

    Aspects Of Training StronglyAgree

    Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree

    WeightedTotal

    WeightedAverage

    Rank

    Course Content 56 23 16 5 330 3.30 1

    Trainers 46 18 12 24 298 2.98 3

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    56/86

    FORMULA USED:

    Weighted Average = FX /N

    Where, FX = fx 1+fx 2+.fx n

    f = F requency

    x = Points allotted for each scale

    N = 100

    Points allotted as follows :

    Strongly Agree - 4 points

    Agree - 3 points

    Disagree - 2 points

    Strongly Disagree - 1 point

    INFERENCE:

    F rom the above computation it is found that,

    F ees 57 23 12 8 329 3.29 2

    Practical Knowledge 45 24 21 10 204 2.04 4

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    57/86

    y Course Content secures Rank I with the highest weighted average that is competitive

    than other training institutes.

    y Fees secures Rank II with second highest weighted average that competitive than

    other training institutes.

    y Trainers secure Rank III with third highest weighted average that competitive than

    other training institutes. .

    y Practical Knowledge secure Rank IV with the least weighted average that

    competitive than other training institutes.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    58/86

    C ALCULATION O F C ORRELATION C OEFFICIENT T O F IND T HE R ELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AGE

    AND W EAKNESS W HICH H INDERS T O G ET J OB :

    AIM :

    To find out whether there is relationship between age and weakness which hinders customers

    to get job.

    Table 4.26: SHOWING THE COE FF ICIENT O F CORRE L ATION BETWEEN AGE AND WEAKNESS WHICH

    HINDERS CUSTOMERS TO GET JOB .

    AgeWeakness which hinders in

    getting a job

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    59/86

    Age

    Pearson Correlation 1 .550 **

    Sig. (2-tailed) 0

    N 100 100

    Weakness which hinders

    in getting a job

    Pearson Correlation .550 ** 1

    Sig. (2-tailed) 0

    N 100 100

    **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

    CALCULATED VALUE:

    Karl Pearsons Coefficient Of Correlation is 0.550

    INFERENCE:

    The Karl Pearson Correlation is positive (0.550). Hence there is relationship between age and

    weakness which hinders customers to get job.

    C ALCULATION O F C ORRELATION C OEFFICIENT T O F IND T HE R ELATIONSHIP BETWEEN

    E XPERIENCE AND SATISFACTION LEVEL

    AIM :

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    60/86

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    61/86

    .

    C ALCULATION O F C ORRELATION C OEFFICIENT T O F IND T HE R ELATIONSHIP BETWEEN

    G ENDER AND C USTOMERS K NOWLEDGE ABOUT SANS INNOVATIONS

    AIM :

    To find out whether there is relationship between gender and customers knowledge about

    SANS INNOVATIONS.

    Table 4.28: SHOWING THE COE FF ICIENT O F CORRE L ATION BETWEEN GENDER A ND CUSTOMERS

    K NOW L EDGE ABOUT SANS INNOVATIONS.

    CALCULATED VALUE:

    Karl Pearsons Coefficient Of Correlation is 0.726

    Gender How Customers know about

    SANS INNOVATIONS

    Gender

    Pearson Correlation 1 0.1

    Sig. (2-tailed) 0.321

    N 100 100

    How Customers know

    about SANS

    INNOVATIONS

    Pearson Correlation 0.1 1

    Sig. (2-tailed) 0.321

    N 100 100

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    62/86

    INFERENCE:

    The Karl Pearson Correlation is positive (0.726). Hence there is relationship between gender

    and customers knowledge about SANS INNOVATIONS.

    SPEARMANS RANK CORRELATION:

    Table 4.29: SHOWING THE TWO VARIAB L ES THAT CONSISTS O F RANKS:

    X 2 4 1 3

    Y 1 3 2 4

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    63/86

    X Aspects increasing market share

    Y Aspects F or Training

    Correlation:

    x y

    Spearman's rho

    X

    Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .600

    Sig. (2-tailed) . .400

    N 4 4

    Y

    Correlation Coefficient .600 1.000

    Sig. (2-tailed) .400 .

    N 4 4

    INFERENCE:

    Spearmans Rank Correlation is 0.600.

    As the correlation is positive, there is positive approach between the two variables.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    64/86

    C HI SQUARE T EST T O C HECK T HE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN G ENDER AND

    SATISFACTION LEVEL O F COURSES PROVIDED

    NULL H YPOTHESIS (H O ):

    There is no significant difference between gender and satisfaction level of courses provided.

    ALTERNATIVE H YPOTHESIS (H 1):

    There is significant difference between gender and satisfaction level of courses provided.

    Gender * satisfaction level of the courses provided

    Cross Tabulation (Observed Frequency)

    Gender Are you satisfied with the courses provided from SANS

    INNOVATIONS

    TotalSatisfied

    Highly

    Satisfied Dissatisfied

    Highly

    Dissatisfied

    Male 27 23 4 2 56

    F emale 21 20 2 1 44

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    65/86

    Total 48 43 6 3 100

    Gender * satisfaction level of the courses provided

    Cross Tabulation (Expected Frequency)

    Gender Are you satisfied with the courses provided from SANS

    INNOVATIONS

    TotalSatisfied

    Highly

    Satisfied Dissatisfied

    Highly

    Dissatisfied

    Male 26.9 24.1 3.4 1.7 56.0

    F emale 21.1 18.9 2.6 1.3 44.0

    Total 48.0 43.0 6.0 3.0 100.0

    C HI SQUARE T EST :

    Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

    sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square .527 a 3 0.913

    L ikelihood Ratio 0.537 3 0.911

    L inear-by- L inear Association 0.102 1 0.75

    N of Valid Cases 100

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    66/86

    a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.32

    Chi Square Value 2 = 0.527

    Degree Of F reedom = 3

    L evel of Significance = 5

    20.05 at 9 d.f (Significance Value) = 0.913

    INFERENCE :

    F rom the above calculation it is found that the significant value of 2 0.913 is greater

    than 0.05. So we accept Ho. Hence it is concluded that there is no significant difference

    between gender and satisfaction level of courses provided.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    67/86

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    68/86

    Prime reason for joining SANS INNOVATIONS * Weakness which hinders in getting a job

    Cross Tabulation (Expected Frequency)

    Prime reason for

    joining SANS

    INNOVATIONS

    Weakness which hinders in getting a job

    TotalCommunication

    SkillTechnical Skill

    L ack of

    Confidence None

    Quality Training 15.1 14 19.8 3.1 52

    Better Prospectus 9.3 8.6 12.2 1.9 32

    Qualified Trainers 4.6 4.3 6.1 1 16

    Total 29 27 38 6 100

    C HI SQUARE T EST :

    Value df Asymp. Sig.

    (2-sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square 15.544a

    6 0.016

    L ikelihood Ratio 15.734 6 0.015

    L inear-by- L inear Association

    0.007 1 0.936

    N of Valid Cases 100

    a. 5 cells (41.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .96.

    Chi Square Value 2 = 15.444

    Degree Of F reedom = 6

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    69/86

    L evel of Significance = 5

    20.05 at 9 d.f (Significance Value) = 0.016

    INFERENCE :

    From the above calculation it is found that the significant value of 2 0.01 6 is less

    than 0.05. So we reject Ho and accept H 1. Hence it is concluded that there is

    significant difference between reason for joining and weakness which hinders in

    getting job.

    C HI SQUARE T EST T O C HECK T HE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AGE AND R EASON

    FOR J OINING SANS INNOVATIONS

    NULL H YPOTHESIS :

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    70/86

    There is no significant difference between competing attractive special offerings and

    suggestions for new schemes.

    ALTERNATIVE H YPOTHESIS :

    There is significant difference between competing attractive special offerings and suggestions

    for new schemes.

    Competing Attractive Special Offerings * Suggestion for New Schemes

    Cross Tabulation (Observed Frequency)

    CompetingAttractive Special

    Offerings

    Suggestion F or New Schemes

    TotalInstallment

    SchemeAdditional Course

    PackageOthers

    Placement 17 9 0 26

    Training F ee 11 9 0 20

    L ive Project 11 4 0 15

    Advertisement 23 9 7 39

    Total 62 31 7 100

    Competing Attractive Special Offerings * Suggestion for New Schemes

    Cross Tabulation (Expected Frequency)

    Competing

    Attractive SpecialOfferings

    Suggestion F or New Schemes

    TotalInstallmentScheme

    Additional CoursePackage

    Others

    Placement 16.1 8.1 1.8 26

    Training F ee 12.4 6.2 1.4 20

    L ive Project 9.3 4.6 1 15

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    71/86

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    72/86

    C HI SQUARE T EST T O C HECK T HE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AGE AND R EASONFOR J OINING SANS INNOVATIONS

    C HI SQUARE T EST :

    NULL H YPOTHESIS :

    There is no significant difference between reason for joining and weakness which hinders in

    getting job.

    ALTERNATIVE H YPOTHESIS :

    There is significant difference between reason for joining and weakness which hinders in

    getting job..

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    73/86

    Age * Prime reason for joining SANS INNOVATIONS Crosstabulation

    Cross Tabulation (Observed Frequency)

    Age

    Prime reason for joining SANS INNOVATIONS

    TotalQuality

    TrainingBetter Prospectus Qualified Trainers

    16-20 21 8 6 35

    21-25 26 9 7 42

    26-30 5 15 3 23

    Total 52 32 16 100

    Age * Prime reason for joining SANS INNOVATIONS Crosstabulation

    Cross Tabulation (Expected Frequency)

    Age

    Prime reason for joining SANS INNOVATIONS

    TotalQuality

    TrainingBetter Prospectus Qualified Trainers

    16-20 18.2 11.2 5.6 35

    21-25 21.8 13.4 6.7 42

    26-30 12 7.4 3.7 23

    Total 52 32 16 100

    C HI SQUARE T EST :

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    74/86

    Value Df Asymp. Sig.

    (2-sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square 15.751 a 4 0.003

    L ikelihood Ratio 15.287 4 0.004

    L inear-by- L inear Association

    2.396 1 0.122

    N of Valid Cases 100

    a. 1 cells (11.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.68.

    Chi Square Value 2 = 15.751

    Degree Of F reedom = 4

    L evel of Significance = 5

    20.05 at 9 d.f (Significance Value) = 0.003

    INFERENCE :

    From the above calculation it is found that the significant value of 2 0.00 3 is less

    than 0.05. So we reject Ho and accept H 1. Hence it is concluded that there is

    significant difference between reason for joining and weakness which hinders in

    getting job.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    75/86

    ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE BETWEEN EXPERIENCE AND THE RATE OFTRAINING PROGRAM UNDERGONE

    Experience * Rating the training program undergone

    Crosstabulation

    ExperienceRate the training program undergone

    Total

    100%-75% 74%-50% 49%-25% 24%-0%

    0-1 Years 14 21 7 5 47

    1-5 Years 28 10 0 0 38

    5-10 Years 14 1 0 0 15

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    76/86

    ExperienceRate the training program undergone

    Total

    100%-75% 74%-50% 49%-25% 24%-0%

    0-1 Years14 21 7 5 47

    1-5 Years 28 10 0 0 38

    5-10 Years 14 1 0 0 15

    Total 56 32 7 5 100

    NULL HYPOTHESIS (H O ):

    There is no significant difference between experience and the rate of the training program

    undergone.

    ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS (H 1):

    There is significant difference between experience and the rate of the training program

    undergone.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    77/86

    Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

    Dependent Variable: value

    Source

    Type III Sum of

    Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    78/86

    INFERENCE:

    By comparing the Experience variance estimate with the residual variance estimate we get

    F c = 1.671. The Significance Value is greater than 0.05 and hence we conclude that there is

    no significant difference experience and the rate of the training program undergone.

    By comparing the rating of training program variance estimate with the residual variance

    estimate we get F c = 4.728. The Significance Value is greater than 0.05 and hence there is no

    significance difference experience and the rate of the training program undergone.

    Intercept Hypothesis 833.333 1 833.333 4.325 .129

    Error 578.000 3 192.667 a

    Experience Hypothesis 136.167 2 68.083 1.671 .265

    Error 244.500 6 40.750 b

    Rating of Training

    Program

    Hypothesis 578.000 3 192.667 4.728 .051

    Error 244.500 6 40.750 b

    Experience *

    Rating of Training

    Program

    Hypothesis 244.500 6 40.750 . .

    Error .000 0 . c

    a. MS(Rating Training Program)

    b. MS(Experience * Rating of Training Program)

    c. MS(Error)

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    79/86

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    80/86

    NULL HYPOTHESIS (H O ):

    There is no significant difference between offers that attracts customers and the new schemes

    to be introduced.

    ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS (H 1):

    There is significant difference between offers that attracts customers and the new schemes to

    be introduced.

    Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

    Placement 22 15 0 37

    Course material 14 6 0 20

    Additional course 16 9 5 30

    Others 10 1 2 13

    Total 62 31 7 100

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    81/86

    INFERENCE:

    By comparing the attractive offers variance estimate with the residual variance

    estimate we get

    F c = 2.754. The Significance Value is greater than 0.05 and hence we conclude that there is no

    significant difference between offers that attracts customers and the new schemes to be

    introduced.

    Dependent Variable:Value

    SourceType III Sum of

    Squaresdf Mean Square F Sig.

    Intercept

    Hypothesis 833.333 1 833.333 4.384 .171

    Error 380.167 2 190.083 a

    Offer Attracts

    Hypothesis 112.667 3 37.556 2.754 .135

    Error 81.833 6 13.639 b

    New Schemes

    Hypothesis 380.167 2 190.083 13.937 .006

    Error 81.833 6 13.639 b

    Offer * New

    Hypothesis 81.833 6 13.639 . .

    Error .000 0 . c

    a. MS(New Schemes)

    b. MS(Offer Attracts* New Schemes)

    c. MS(Error)

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    82/86

    By comparing the rating of training program variance estimate with the residual

    variance estimate we get F c = 1 3 .93 7. The Significance Value is greater than 0.05 and

    hence there is no significance difference between offers that attracts customers and the

    new schemes to be introduced.

    F INDINGS

    It is observed that majority of respondents are male.

    It has been found that majority of respondents belongs to the age group 21 25 yrs.

    Majority of the respondents in the age group of 16-20, 21-25 yrs are less than one year

    experienced or freshers.

    About 42% of the respondents come to know about SANS INNOVATIONS through

    seminars.

    It has been found that most of the respondents havent seen or heard any of SANS

    INNOVATIONSs television or fm ads.

    Majority of the respondents (43.59%) have seen SANS INNOVATIONSs print ads. So

    that has been found that print ad is more effective for SANS INNOVATIONS.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    83/86

    Majority of the respondents belongs to the age group 21-25 yrs join reason for the

    quality of training (52%) provided by SANS INNOVATIONS.

    It has been found that 91% of the respondents are satisfied by the courses and 9% of the

    respondents are not satisfied.

    It has been found that majority of the respondents are attracted towards SANS

    INNOVATIONS by the placement (37%) offer provided by SANS INNOVATIONS.

    Others major attraction is additional courses (30%) provided by SANS

    INNOVATIONS.

    80% of the respondents agree that fees in SANS INNOVATIONS is reasonable thanother institutes. 20% of the respondents dont agree to it.

    It has been found that 79% of the respondents agree that course content of SANS

    INNOVATIONS is good. 21% of the respondents disagree to it.

    Majority of the respondents (64%) agrees that trainers are good in SANS

    INNOVATIONS. Others (36%) disagrees that trainers are good.

    38% of the respondents have weakness of lack of confidence.

    It has been found that majority of the respondents agrees that scholarship can improve

    SANS INNOVATIONS. Second large group of respondents agrees that advertisement

    can improve SANS INNOVATIONS. Third large group of respondents agrees that

    seminars can improve SANS INNOVATIONS. L ast group of respondents agrees that

    providing offers can improve SANS INNOVATIONS.

    Majority of the respondents wants installment scheme to be introduced in SANS

    INNOVATIONS.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    84/86

    It has been fount that majority of the respondents prefer phone as their favorable

    contact mode. Second largest respondents prefer e-mail as favorable contact mode.

    76% of the respondents agree that SANS INNOVATIONS helps them to materialize

    their dream. 24% of the respondents disagrees that SANS INNOVATIONS helps themto materialize their dream.

    It has been found that there is relationship between the age of the respondents and their

    weakness to find job.

    It is also been found that there is relationship between the experience and the

    satisfaction level of the customers.

    It has been found that there is no significant difference between gender and satisfaction

    level of courses provided.

    It is also been found that there is significant difference between reason for joining and

    weakness which hinders in getting job.

    It is found that SANS INNOVATIONS is fastly growing among other training

    institutes.

    SUGGESTION S

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    85/86

    The main suggestion is to improve the number of advertisement in print media and

    air media. Because these are the media which present customers come to know

    about SANS INNOVATIONS.

    It is also suggested that to advertise in television which can reach the target

    customers easily. It is also found to be powerful media.

    More number of customers can be attracted from colleges and schools. So

    approaching the schools and colleges can be more effective.

    It is suggested that to advertise the attractive offers preferred by the customers

    which will be effective in attracting new customers.

    It should be concentrated on weaker areas such as quality of trainers, etc, to

    increase the word of mouth.

    Periodic meeting can be conducted with the customers to know their need and

    deliver the service according to it.

    As customers suggested scholarship, installment schemes can be introduced.

    Customers weakness should be identified by counseling process.

    Road shows, posters type of advertisement may help to increase customers.

    Waiting time of the customers should be reduced; also the batch size has to be

    reduced to make the customers feel better.

    Present strategies are effective and the effective team of marketing should be made

    more aggressive.

  • 8/8/2019 Cus Satisfaction

    86/86

    C ONCLUSION

    The study is concentrated for analyzing the satisfaction level of customers towards SANS

    INNOVATIONS. The study has been conducted only to the customers who have taken training

    from SANS INNOVATIONS.

    The study reveals that though the company seems to be moving it right lines as far as its

    current marketing strategy for training is concerned, it has a few drawbacks in implementation of certain strategies. Those drawbacks were identified and remedies are suggested for the

    development.

    It has been concluded that most the customers in SANS INNOVATIONS are satisfied by

    the services rendered by them. F ew changes have to be made to make more effective in order to

    expand the service to more people.