curriculum internationalisation/ keyquestions & considerations · curriculum is the...
TRANSCRIPT
The UK’s European university
CURRICULUM INTERNATIONALISATION/ Key Questions & Considerations
Dean for Internationalisation
Video via ‘Think Kent’
Page 2
See https://www.kent.ac.uk/global/curriculum.html
Overview
Page 3
TWO KEY QUESTIONS (Q1&Q2):
• What is curriculum internationalisation?
• Why is curriculum internationalisation important?
THREE IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS (C1-C3):
• Challenges to curriculum internationalisation
• Identified examples of curriculum
internationalisation at Kent
• Some requirements for development and
sustainability
Q1- What is Curriculum Internationalisation?
Page 4
• DEFINITION: Internationalisation of the
curriculum is the incorporation of international,
and /or global dimensions into the content of
the curriculum as well as the learning outcomes
,assessment tasks, teaching methods and
support services of a program of study.
Leask 2009, p.209
• Just as internationalisation is diverse and multi-
layered, so is curriculum internationalisation.
This is due to the different ways in which the
curriculum can be internationalised and the
many subjects which are taught and studied.
Q1- What is Curriculum Internationalisation?
Page 5
A positive response to globalization:
• that makes connections which are enriching and which
offer fresh cultural insights and exchanges (Giddens 1999)
• to support critical and independent thought alongside a strong value
base of social justice (Bourn 2010)
• confirmed through action, to infuse international and comparative
perspectives throughout teaching, research, and service missions of
higher education (Hudzik, 2011)
• which recognises the requirements and challenges associated with the
globalisation of societies , economy and labour markets (van der
Wende 1997)
• which advocates a re-orientation towards outcomes and impacts and
away from input and output approach (de Wit, 2014)
• to integrate an international, intercultural or global dimension into the
purpose , functions or delivery of post-secondary education. (Knight
2008)
• to build bridges of tolerance and respect for other cultures (Kramsch
2002)
Q1- What is Curriculum Internationalisation?
Page 6
• Formal curriculum, such as
module, and programme content
• Informal curriculum, such as co-
curricular activity
• Hidden curriculum, such as other
institutional practices or
conventions
Q2- Why is Curriculum Internationalisation
important? A few reasons:
Page 7
• DIVERSE COMMUNITY - International
communities are comprised of different individuals
with alternative, understandings, approaches and
goals.
• CRITICAL THINKING - An international curriculum
provides access to to rich and varied viewpoints
which contributes to the process of critical thinking
• KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT & APPLICATION
- Different contexts bring important insights for the
development and application of knowledge in a
broad range of situations.
• EMPLOYABILITY - After university you are likely
to be working in an international environment or
interacting with people from diverse backgrounds
C1- Challenges to Curriculum
Internationalisation
• CULTURAL - Clifford (2009) identified some representatives of particular
discipline areas are less persuaded of the need to engage in the discourse of
curriculum internationalisation.
• Green and Whitstead (2013) note that disciplines are at the heart of the IoC
process. Each discipline has its own culture and history, its own ways of
investigating, understanding and responding to the world (Becher, 1989)
Differences between disciplines extend far beyond the content taught; they go to
the heart of teaching, research and student-faculty relationships.
Page 8
C1- Challenges to Curriculum
Internationalisation
• PERSONAL - Bennett, (2008) refers to Mindset,
Skillset and Heart set to describe capacity,
willingness and commitment of staff. Support and
preparation are key.
Resources
• Use the Curriculum Internationalisation Tool Kit
(this document)
• Attend a Learning & Teaching Network session
• Watch the Curriculum Internationalisation video
• Take an online course
• Discuss with Associate Deans or Dean for
Internationalisation
• Join or gain support from the CIWP
Page 9
Curriculum Internationalisation Working Party
Page 10
The new (Draft) CIWP Terms of Reference involve:
• Promoting existing sector good practice for
curriculum internationalisation
• Identifying models of existing good practice within
Kent Schools and Faculties- including how
schools respond to the new section within the
module specification
• Suggesting and taking forward mechanisms for
curriculum internationalisation at Kent, including
within formal, informal and hidden contexts
• Providing guidance and training to Kent staff to
inform curriculum internationalisation.
• Support to and from home and international
students in recognizing the importance of and need
for curriculum Internationalisation
C1- Challenges to Curriculum
Internationalisation
• INSTITUTIONAL - Leask
(2014) refers to institutional
blockers in terms of
University organisation
structures and the level of
institutional engagement with
the process.
Page 11
Section in Module Specification:
C2- Identified Examples of Curriculum
Internationalisation at Kent:
Page 12
• LEARNING OUTCOMES - Existing examples of
modules with embedded internationalisation and
incorporation into the module design process.
• PROGRAMME OR MODULE CONTENT - a wide
range of modules and programmes with an
international focus – Can include our Global
Engagement Modules.
• ACTIVITIES AND METHODOLOGY – diverse
teaching approaches based on/linked to world-
leading research.
• ASSESSMENT – different approaches to
assessment and module assessment patterns
beyond standard/customary practice.
• TAKING ADVANTAGE OF STUDENT/STAFF
CULTURAL DIVERSITY- 27% international
students, 40% non UK academic staff and a large
number of visiting academics
• See: https://www.kent.ac.uk/global/curriculum.html
C2- Identified Examples of Curriculum
Internationalisation at Kent:
Page 13
See: https://www.kent.ac.uk/global/curriculum.html
C3- Some requirements for sustainability:
Page 14
• BESPOKE - Alternative approaches for different
subject areas
• TRAINING - Ongoing guidance and skill-building
opportunities for staff
• SUPPORT- for home and international students in
recognising the importance and relevance of
internationalisation within the curriculum
• DIGITAL MEDIA - Taking Kent overseas in new ways
• INSTITUTIONAL PRIORITISATION - E.G. Curriculum
Internationalisation Working Party (CIWP)
Page 15
References• Becher, T., Trowler, P. & Society for Research into Higher Education 2001; 2010, Academic tribes and territories:
intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines, Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University
Press, Maidenhead.
• Bourn, D. 2010, “Students as global citizens" in , ed. E. Jones, Routledge, London, pp. 18-130.
• Clifford, V. 2009, "Engaging the diciplines in internationalizing the curriculum", International Journal for Academic
Development, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 133-143.
• De Wit, H., Hunter, F. & Egron-Polak, E. 2015, Internationalisation of Higher Education, European Parliament,
Brussels.
• Giddens, A. 1999, , LSE. The Director's lectures: Politics are socialism. Available: www.lse.ac.uk/giddens/lectures
• Green, Wendy & Whitsed, C.(.l. 2015, Critical perspectives on internationalising the curriculum in disciplines : reflective
narrative accounts from business, education and health, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam.
• Hudzik, J. 2011, "Comprehensive Internationalization: from concept to action", NAFSA: Association of International
Educators, Washington DC.
• Jones, E.1. 2010, Internationalisation and the student voice : higher education perspectives, Routledge, New York ;
London.
• KU Leuven 2014, , ICOMS: International Competences [Homepage of KU Leuven], [Online]. Available:
http://www.internationalecompetenties.be/en/home/ [October, 2015]
• Kalvemark, M. & van der Wende, M. National Policies for the Internationalising of Higher Education in Europe, National
Agency for Higher Education, Stockholm.
• Knight, J. 2008, Higher Education in Turmoil. The Changing World of Internationalization, Sense Publishers,
Rotterdam.
• Kramsch, C. 2002, "In search of the intercultural", Journal of Sociolinguistics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 275-285.
• Leask, B. 2009, "Using formal and informal curricula to improve interactions between home and international students",
Journal of Studies in International Education, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 2005-221
• Leask, B. 2015, Internationalizing the curriculum, Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York
THE UK’S EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY
www.kent.ac.uk