curriculum, instruction, and assessment in task-based ... · deborah kennedy and woomee kim center...

34
Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June 2017 Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based Online Course Design 1

Upload: others

Post on 04-Nov-2019

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

DeborahKennedyandWoomeeKimCenterforAdvancedProficiencyinEnglish,GMUInteragencyLanguageRoundtablev2June2017

Curriculum,Instruction,andAssessmentinTask-BasedOnlineCourseDesign

1

Page 2: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

Background§  CenterforAdvancedProficiencyinEnglish:OneoftheoriginalLanguageTrainingCentersfundedbyDLNSEO/U.S.DepartmentofDefensestarEngin2013

§  Purpose:ProvideonlineinstrucEoninprofessional-levelwriEngskillsfornon-naEvespeakersofEnglishwhoareDoDpersonnel

§  Phase1:AdvancedProfessionalWriEnginEnglish1,a10-weekonlinecourseingeneralprofessionalwriEng

§  Phase2:APWE2,ProfessionalSummaryWriEng,pilotedin2016-2017

§  CAPEoriginallybasedatUMBC,nowatGMU

2

Page 3: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

AdvancedProfessionalWritinginEnglish2

§ Format:

§  FullyonlinecourseprovidedontheGMUBlackBoardlearningmanagementsystem

§  10hoursofclassworkperweek

§ Focus:TraininginsummarywriEngforprofessionalpurposes

§ Eligibility:DoDpersonnelwhohadcompletedAPWE1

3

Page 4: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

LearningObjectivesParEcipantswhocompleteallcourseacEviEeswillbeableto

§  CreatesummariesthatalignwiththeexpectaEonsofthefederalworkplaceusingoneormoresourcetexts

§  IdenEfythemainideaofeachsourcetextandthewriter’spurposeforwriEngandperspecEveonthetopic

§  Understandanduseparaphrasing,summarizing,andsynthesizingtechniques

§  UseguidelinestostructuretheirsummarywriEng,andusearubrictoevaluateandconEnuetoimprovetheirsummarywriEngskills

4

Page 5: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

InstructionalDesign

§  Taskbased:FocusedonsummarywriEng

§  Learner/learningfocused:DialogueeducaEon,understandingbydesign§  JaneVella,LearningtoListen,LearningtoTeach.Jossey-Bass,1994.

§  J.Vella,P.Berardinelli,&J.Burrow,HowDoTheyKnowTheyKnow.Jossey-Bass,1998.

§  G.Wiggins&J.McTighe,UnderstandingbyDesign(2nded.).Pearson,2005.

§  Allcoursematerials,acEviEes,andexercisesarepostedandavailablethroughoutthecourse.ParEcipantscangobackandrevieworre-doexercisesandtaskswhenevertheywish.Theycanalsoworkaheadiftheywish.

§  CourseparEcipantsknowfromthebeginningwhattheywilllearntodoandhowtheywillknowthattheyhavelearnedtodoit.

5

Page 6: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

InstructionalDesign,cont.

§  AllcourseworkisassessedbyinstructorsandbyparEcipantsthemselvesusingadescripEverubric.Self-assessmentandpeerassessmentarefundamentalpartsoftheinstrucEonaldesign.

§  InstructorsandparEcipantsworktogetherthroughaseriesoftasksandexercisesthatleaduptoafinalproject.Alongtheway,parEcipantsevaluatetheirworkoneachtaskusingtherubric.Theinstructorusesthesamerubrictoprovidefeedback,soparEcipantsalwaysknowhowtheyarebeingevaluated.

§  Thefinalprojecttakesplaceinthefinalweekofthecourse.ItisoutlinedforparEcipantsatthebeginningofthecourse,sotheyknowwhattheirgoalis.

§  ThisapproachgivesparEcipantsresponsibilityfortheirownlearningwhileinthecourse,andtoolsthatenablethemtoconEnuelearningontheirownaderthecourseends.

6

Page 7: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

ChallengeswiththeInstructionalDesign

§  Fullyonline,asynchronouscourse:EssenEaltoestablishandmaintaininstructorpresence

§  ParEcipants’quesEonsaboutvalueofassessingtheirownwork

§  ParEcipants’quesEonsaboutvalueofpeerreview

7

Page 8: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

FrequentlyAskedQuestion#1:WhyEvaluateMyOwnWriting?

•  Thehallmarkofastrongwriteristheabilitytoreviewandeditone’sownwrieenwork.

•  UsingtheSummaryEvaluaEonRubrictoevaluateyourwriEngthroughoutthecoursewillhelpyoudevelopthis

ability.

•  ConsistentlyreviewingyourwriEnginrelaEontoanexternalstandardwillmakeyouastrongerwriteroverEme.

8

Page 9: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

FrequentlyAskedQuestion#2:WhyWorkinaPeerGroup?

• Whenyouwrite,youwriteforanaudience.WorkingwithpeerscanhelpyoudevelopyoursenseofhowyourwriEngmightappeartoyouraudience.

•  Reviewingyourpeers’wriEngcanalsohelpyouunderstandhowreadersconnectwithawriter’swork.

•  YoumaygainideasfromyourpeersaboutwaysofapproachingsummarywriEngthatyouhadnotthoughtofyourself.

9

Page 10: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

SummaryEvaluationRubric

ElementTypes•  Content•  OrganizaEon•  Language•  Synthesis

Levels•  Experienced•  Capable•  Developing•  Emerging

10

Page 11: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

ContentinaSummaryAstrongsummaryprovidesthefollowinginformaEonaboutthesourcedocument(s):

§  PurposeandperspecEve:Whatistheauthor’spurposeforwriEng?Whatistheauthor’sperspecEveorbias?

§  Mainidea:Whatistheauthor’scentralpoint?Whatmainthingdoestheauthorwantthereadertoknow,understand,ordo?

§  Support:Howdoestheauthorsupportthemainidea?WhatarethesupporEngideasorarguments?

InaddiEon,astrongsummaryisobjecEve:ItdoesnotincludetheperspecEveoropinionofthesummarywriter.

11

Page 12: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

SummaryEvaluationRubric:Content

Element Experienced Capable Developing Emerging

Purpose/perspective

The purpose of each source document is identified correctly and stated clearly and accurately.

The purpose of each source document is identified correctly and stated in broad terms.

The purpose of each source document is identified but not clearly stated.

The purpose of each source document is not identified correctly or is not stated at all.

Main focus or idea

The main idea of each source document is identified correctly and stated clearly and accurately.

The main idea of each source document is identified correctly and stated in broad terms.

The main idea of each source document is not clearly stated, or another idea is identified as the main idea.

A supporting idea is identified as the main idea, or the main idea is not identified at all.

Support

All key supporting ideas from each source document are identified correctly and stated clearly and accurately.

Most key supporting ideas from each source are identified correctly; most are stated clearly and accurately.

Some supporting ideas are identified correctly; some less important details are identified as supporting ideas.

Key supporting ideas are not identified or not stated; only minor ideas are identified as key supporting ideas.

Objectivity

The summary includes only information from the source document(s).

The summary includes mostly information from the source document(s), but may also contain a reference to the summary writer's perspective.

The summary mixes information from the source document(s) with several references to the summary writer's opinion or perspective.

The summary focuses mainly on the summary writer's opinion or perspective.

12

Page 13: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

OrganizationofaSummaryAstrongsummaryusesthreeprinciplestoorganizeinformaEonaboutthesourcedocument(s):

§  Opening:Thesummarybeginswithastatementofthesource’spurposeandmainidea,followingtheBLUF(BoeomLineUpFront)principle

§  Sequence:ThesummaryorganizesmaterialsothateachsupporEngideaispresentedclearlyandsuccinctly

§  Length:ThesummarycontainsonlyessenEalinformaEon

ThiswayoforganizingmaterialinasummarymeetstheexpectaEonsofreadersfromWesternculturesingeneral,andmilitarycontextsinparEcular.

13

Page 14: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

SummaryEvaluationRubric:Organization

Element Experienced Capable Developing Emerging

Opening

The summary opens with a clear, concise, accurate statement of each source document's purpose and main idea.

The opening statement is mostly focused on the purpose and main idea of each source document, but may also contain other material.

The summary opens with a statement that does not reference the purpose or main idea of the source document(s).

The summary does not have a clear opening statement.

Sequence of material

The summary presents supporting ideas according to a clear, consistent organizing principle that helps the reader follow the sequence.

The summary has an organizing principle, but uses it inconsistently or in ways that may confuse the reader.

The summary switches among different organizing principles and provides little direction for the reader.

The summary does not present supporting ideas according to any clear organizing principle. Writing lacks a sense of direction or seems random.

Length

The summary includes only the most essential information. It is short and quickly read.

The summary includes essential information and some additional material. It is a little longer than it needs to be.

The summary contains much extraneous material and is much longer than it needs to be.

The summary is as long as, or longer than, the source document.

14

Page 15: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

LanguageinaSummaryAstrongsummaryuseslanguageeffecEvelytocommunicatewiththereader.

§  Paraphrasingandvocabulary:Thesummaryexpressestheauthor’smeaninginoriginalwordsandconveysmeaningclearlythroughprecisevocabulary

§  Style,tone,andvoice:Thesummaryiswrieeninaprofessionalstylethatisappropriateforthereaders

§  Cohesionandcoherence:ThesummaryuseslinkingwordsandstructurestoshowconnecEonsamongideas

§  Sentencestructure,grammar,mechanics:Thesummaryuseslanguagecorrectly

15

Page 16: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

SummaryEvaluationRubric:Language

Element Experienced Capable Developing EmergingParaphrasing and vocabulary (choices and usage)

The summary contains all original writing and strong vocabulary choices that convey meaning precisely.

The summary contains mostly original writing and good vocabulary choices. It may have occasional echoes of the source document(s).

Many sentences in the summary contain incomplete paraphrases of the source document(s). Vocabulary is not precise; some words are used incorrectly.

The summary contains full sentences copied directly from the source document(s). Vocabulary is limited and words are often used incorrectly.

Style, tone, and voice Style and voice are professional. Tone is appropriate for the audience.

Style and voice are mostly professional. Tone is mostly appropriate for the audience.

Voice varies between professional and casual. Style includes occasional idioms/slang expressions. Tone is not always appropriate for a professional readership.

Voice is overly casual or personal. Style uses many idiomatic expressions and second person address ("you"). Tone is not appropriate for a professional readership.

Cohesion and coherence The summary links ideas with cohesive devices that guide the reader . It has clear overall coherence of ideas and structure.

The summary sometimes uses cohesive devices to link ideas and guide the reader. It has some features of overall coherence.

The summary uses few cohesive devices or uses them inappropriately. It has little overall coherence and may be confusing to the reader.

The summary is a string of sentences with no internal cohesion or overall coherence. The reader must re-read and interpret to achieve understanding.

Sentence structure, grammar, and mechanics (punctuation, spelling)

All sentences are clear and complete. The summary contains no errors in grammar or mechanics.

Most sentences are clear and complete. The summary contains very few errors in grammar or mechanics.

Several sentences are unclear or incomplete. The summary contains many grammar and mechanics errors that distract the reader.

Most or all sentences are incomplete. Errors in grammar and mechanics prevent the reader from understanding the meaning.

16

Page 17: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

SynthesisAstrongsummaryoftwoormoresourcesrepresentseachsourcefullyandequally.

§  Itpresentsthecontentofeachsourceaccurately§  Itisnotbiasedtowardonesourceoverothers§  ItmakesclearwhichinformaEoncomesfromwhichsource

17

Element Experienced Capable Developing EmergingSynthesis The summary synthesizes

the sources clearly. It credits each original source correctly and appropriately balances the sources’ content without bias.

The summary represents and credits all sources, but may not be consistent in crediting them clearly and correctly. There may be some imbalance in the representation of the sources.

The summary does not fully represent the source documents or credit them correctly. The summary may favor one source document over the other(s).

The summary omits or falsely represents a source, or fails to credit original sources properly, or is obviously biased toward one source.

Page 18: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

ChallengeswiththeRubric§  PurposeandperspecEve:Theseneedtobeseparatedfromoneanother.

§  Length:Tooshortisasmuchofaproblemastoolong.

§  Assigninglevelsappropriately

18

Page 19: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

CourseContentandSequenceCoursetopicsaresequencedsothatparEcipantsbuildtheskillstheyneedtocompletethefinalproject.ThefinalprojectisasynthesissummarythatdrawsontwoarEcles.

§  OrientaEonWeek,Module1:NavigaEngtheonlinelearningsystem;understandingandusingarubric

§  Week1,Module2:Thecontentofastrongsummary:purposeandperspecEve,mainandsupporEngideas,objecEvity

§  Week2,Module3:OrganizaEonofastrongsummary:opening,sequenceofinformaEon,length

§  Week3,Module4:Languageuseinastrongsummary:paraphrasingandvocabulary,styleandtone,cohesionandcoherence,sentencestructureandgrammar

§  Week4,Module5:SynthesizingfrommulEplesourcesinastrongsummary

§  Week5,Module6:Reviewandfinalproject

19

Page 20: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

OrientationWeek,Module1

RequiredacEviEes:

§  CompleteandsubmittheEntryAssessment

§  ReviewresourcematerialsononeormoreaspectsofsummarywriEng.

§  AnalyzetwosummariesusingtheSummaryEvaluaEonRubric.Submittheanalysisasanassignment.

§  AnswerquesEonsabouttheanalysisonthediscussionboard,andpostrepliestotheresponsesofatleasttwopeers.

§  PosttotheindividualLearningProgressLog.

20

Page 21: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

Modules2-5RequiredacEviEes:

§  ReviewresourcematerialsononeormoreaspectsofsummarywriEng.

§  AnalyzeasummaryusingtheSummaryEvaluaEonRubric.Submittheanalysisasanassignment.

§  AnswerquesEonsabouttheanalysisonthediscussionboard,andpostrepliestotheresponsesofatleasttwopeers.

§  Readoneortwosourcedocumentsandwriteasummary,usingprovidedguidelines.Analyzethesummaryandsubmitthesummaryandanalysisasanassignment.

§  AnswerquesEonsaboutthesummaryonthediscussionboard,andpostrepliestotheresponsesofatleasttwopeers.

§  PosttotheindividualLearningProgressLog.

21

Page 22: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

Module6

ThefocusofModule6iscompleEonofthefinalproject.RequiredacEviEes:

§  Readtwosourcedocumentsandwriteasynthesissummary.Analyzethesummaryandsubmitthesummaryandanalysisasanassignment.Thisassignmentisthefinalprojectforthecourse.

§  PosttotheindividualLearningProgressLog.

§  CompletetheExitAssessment.

22

Page 23: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

ChallengeswithContentandSequence

§  TheamountofmaterialwasmorethansomeparEcipantscouldmanagein10hoursperweek.

§  Importanceofteachingreadingskills.

§  InsufficientEmealloeedtodevelopingsynthesizingskills.

23

Page 24: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

CourseMaterials

MaterialsforsummarizingweredrawnfromgeneralinterestpublicaEonsandfrommaterialsdevelopedforadvancedEnglishlearnersinmilitarycontexts.

§  CharlesBoyle&SimonMellor-Clarke,Campaign:EnglishfortheMilitary(Macmillan,2006)

§  TheWashingtonPost

§  TimeMagazine

§  Otheronlineresources

24

Page 25: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

CourseMaterials,cont.

§  EachmoduleexceptModule6hadaninstructor-developedPowerPointthatexplainedthemainideasofthatmodule,supplementedwithappropriateresourcereadingsfoundonline.

§  SamplesummariesweredevelopedbyCALforuseinthesummaryevaluaEonacEviEes.

§  Supplementarymaterialsincludedinstructor-developedillustraEonsoftheprocessformappinganarEcle’scontenttocreateasummary,andopEonalexercisesonspecifictopicssuchasuseofcohesivedevices.

25

Page 26: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

ChallengeswithCourseMaterials

§  NeededarEclesthatwererelevantandinteresEng,butnottoorelevant.

§  SomearEclesworkedbeeerthanothersforsummarizing.

§  MorearEcle-mappingillustraEonsandstrongsummaryexamplesareneeded.

§  Teachingmaterialsmustbedevelopedspecificallyforthecourse–fewappropriateresourcesavailable.

26

Page 27: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

EntryandExitAssessment

§  Entry:ReadanarEcleandwriteasummaryofit.SummaryratedbyCALratersusingtheSummaryEvaluaEonRubric.

§  Exit:ReadthesamearEcleandwriteasummaryofit.SummaryratedbyCALratersusingtheSummaryEvaluaEonRubric.

§  Module6LearningProgressLog:CompareentrysummarywithexitsummaryandanswerquesEonsaboutself-percepEonsofimprovement.

§  IncreasedunderstandingofwhatconsEtutesaneffecEvesummary

§  Increasedawarenessofownstrengthsandongoingneedsasawriter

27

Page 28: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

Self-AssessmentatEntryandExit

§  ThemostimportantelementIfeelconfidentwithisthemainidea.NowIreadthearEclelookingforwhatistheauthortryingtosayasawholenotthedetail.

§  ThefirstcoupleofEmesIwrotemysummaries,Imissedtheauthor'sperspecEve.Itriedtoincorporatetheauthor'sperspecEveonmyexitassessment.

§  IntheentryassessmentIdidnotidenEfythemainideawhileintheexitassessmentIsummarizedthemainideainthefirstsentence.IthinkmyabilitytowriteeffecEvesummarieshaveincreasedgreatly.NowIreadthearEcleandwriteinmyownwordswhatthedocumentwantstoconvey.

§  MyskillsrelatedtotheseelementsimprovedbecausenowIcanwriteasummarythatopenswithaclear,concise,andaccuratestatementofthearEcleinsteadofleavingpartofthemainideaunEltheendofthesummary.

§  Iaskedmyselfwhatwastheboeomlineofhismessage,asidefromthedetails.Ihaveimprovedbychoosingmorespecificwords.IsEllneedtoimprovemyBLUFsentencewriEngskill.

28

Page 29: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

Self-AssessmentatEntryandExit

§  IwasnotevenawareofBLUFinthebeginning.IlearnedBLUFinthecourse,andIfounditveryhelpfulandefficientinwriEngsummaries.IwillconEnueusingthistechniqueinthefuture.

§  IbelievenowI’mabletowritesummariesandotherdocumentsusingstrongervocabulary.Module4helpmealottoimprovemyskills.IdorecognizeIcanimprovethestructureofmysentences.

§  IsEllneedtopracEcewriEngasummarythatcontainsalloriginalwriEngandstrongvocabularychoicesthatconveytheexactmeaning.

§  IsEllneedtoworkonwriEngmysummaryfrommyownwordsandnottakewordsorphrasesfromtheoriginalwriEng.Ihavetochoosestrongvocabularyandphrasesthatconveytheexactmeaning.

•  Iparaphrasemuchbeeernow.ThecoursehelpedmetodifferenEatebetweenweakandstrongparaphrasing.ThisisonepartthatIneededtoimprove,andIdid.

29

Page 30: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

Self-AssessmentatEntryandExit

§  UsingstrongvocabularywasanotherchallengebecauseIwasafraidofchangingthetextorthemeaning,butwithguidancefromthecourseinstructorsIlearnedhowtoselectbeeerstrongervocabularywithoutchangingthemeaning.

§  AnotherimprovementtomywriEngwasusingmorecohesivetoolstomakemysentencesadhereandflowsmoothlytogether.ThiswasbroughttomyaeenEonbyoneoftheinstructorsduringoneofthemodulesandsureenoughInoEcedthispaeerninmywriEng,andIthinknowIambeeerinthisaspect.

§  Ifeltmuchmorereadytotackletheexitassessment.UponreadingthearEcle,Iwrotedownthepurpose,mainidea,andsupporEngevidence.IwasabletowritethesummaryandchecktheorganizaEonandlanguageuse.Ididusethefullhour,butIfeltthatIunderstoodtheprocess.IfeelthatI'velearnedatremendousamountaboutthetechnicalaspectsofsummarizingandsynthesizingthatIknowIwillconEnuetouse.

30

Page 31: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

NumericOutcomes:Content

31

PURPOSE/PERSP. MAINIDEA SUPPORT OBJECTIVITYENTRYAVG EXITAVG

AVGCHANGE

Part. ENTRY EXIT ENTRY EXIT ENTRY EXIT ENTRY EXIT

1 3 1 3 2 3 2 4 2 3.25 1.75 -1.502 2 2 3 2 2 2 4 3 2.75 2.25 -0.503 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 3 3.50 3.25 -0.254 1 2 2 3 2 2 3 4 2.00 2.75 0.755 1 3 2 4 2 3 3 4 2.00 3.50 1.506 1 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 1.75 3.00 1.257 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1.00 1.50 0.508 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3.25 3.25 0.009 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 4 2.25 2.75 0.5010 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 4 2.25 3.00 0.7511 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 3.75 3.25 -0.5012 3 2 3 2 2 3 4 3 3.00 2.50 -0.5013 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 2 2.25 1.25 -1.0014 2 3 2 3 2 2 4 4 2.50 3.00 0.5015 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 4 3.00 2.75 -0.2516 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 4 2.25 3.00 0.7517 1 2 2 3 2 3 3 3 2.00 2.75 0.7518 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 4 2.00 2.50 0.50

10increased– avgincrease0.781stayedthesame7decreased– avgdecrease-0.64

Page 32: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

NumericOutcomes:Organization

32 11increased– avgincrease0.552stayedthesame5decreased– avgdecrease-0.47

OPENING SEQUENCE LENGTHAVGENTRY AVGEXIT

AVGCHANGE

Part. ENTRY EXIT ENTRY EXIT ENTRY EXIT 1 2 2 3 3 4 3 3.00 2.67 -0.332 2 2 3 3 3 2 2.67 2.33 -0.333 3 4 4 4 4 4 3.67 4.00 0.334 2 2 3 3 2 3 2.33 2.67 0.335 1 4 3 3 3 2 2.33 3.00 0.676 2 3 3 3 2 3 2.33 3.00 0.677 1 2 1 3 2 3 1.33 2.67 1.338 3 3 3 3 3 3 3.00 3.00 0.009 2 3 3 3 3 3 2.67 3.00 0.3310 2 3 3 3 3 3 2.67 3.00 0.3311 3 3 3 4 3 2 3.00 3.00 0.0012 3 2 3 3 3 3 3.00 2.67 -0.3313 2 2 2 2 3 1 2.33 1.67 -0.6714 2 3 3 3 3 3 2.67 3.00 0.3315 3 2 4 3 3 3 3.33 2.67 -0.6716 1 3 2 3 3 3 2.00 3.00 1.0017 2 3 3 3 3 3 2.67 3.00 0.3318 1 2 3 3 3 3 2.33 2.67 0.33

Page 33: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

NumericOutcomes:Language

33 12increased– avgincrease0.584stayedthesame4decreased– avgdecrease-0.38

PARA/VOCAB STYLE/TONE COHESIONSTRUCT/GRAMMAR

ENTRYAVG EXITAVG

AVGCHANGE

Part. ENTRY EXIT ENTRY EXIT ENTRY EXIT ENTRY EXIT 1 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2.50 2.00 -0.502 2 2 4 2 3 3 2 2 2.75 2.25 -0.503 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 4 3.25 3.75 0.504 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3.00 3.25 0.255 3 3 3 4 2 3 2 3 2.50 3.25 0.756 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 4 2.00 3.25 1.257 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1.25 2.00 0.758 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2.75 3.00 0.259 2 3 3 3 3 3 1 2 2.25 2.75 0.5010 2 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 2.25 3.00 0.7511 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 4 3.25 3.50 0.2512 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 2 2.50 2.25 -0.2513 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2.25 2.25 0.0014 2 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 2.75 2.50 -0.2515 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3.00 3.00 0.0016 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 2.00 2.75 0.7517 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2.50 3.00 0.5018 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2.00 2.50 0.50

Page 34: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Task-Based ... · Deborah Kennedy and Woomee Kim Center for Advanced Proficiency in English, GMU Interagency Language Roundtable v 2 June

[email protected]@key-words.us

34