cultural heritage institutions deserve better!
TRANSCRIPT
Raising awareness for rights issues
2
1) rights labelling campaign 2) supporting the public domain 3) copyright policy support
Rights labelling campaign
As part of Europeana Awareness we have worked with the ingestion team to ensure that all metadata records in Europeana carry one of 13 standardized rights labels. In October 2014 47% of all digital objects available via Europeana had a rights label that allows re-use by third parties.
Unmarked/UnknownAll Rights ReservedCreative CommonsPublic Domain
Rights label per category (as percentage of total)
WRONG PRESENTATION
Establishes an unrealistically high standard of diligent search Fails to address whole categories of works (foto’s) Does not grant cultural heritage institutions sufficient protection from damages
The Orphan Works directive
this is where we need to be
A battle, Peter Snayers, 1615 - 1650 via rijksmuseum.nl
…better than a copyright directive that allows us to make works available only via ‘dedicated terminals’
…better than a lending directive that leaves libraries
at the mercy of publishers when they want to lend out
e-books
source: governance across borders
Leonhard Dobusch CC-BY
Opposing interests?
Cultural heritage institutions argue for exceptions that allow them to make works available online
which are not in commercial circulation anymore
Publishers (and Authors) are primarily concerned that cultural heritage institutions will use broader exceptions to unfairly compete with them
ensure that cultural heritage
that is not in commercial exploitation
anymore remains available for the
public
primary exploitation of creative works (needs to be protected from unfair competition)
Cultural Heritage Institutions
Publishers and Creators
Kennisland works with Europeana and its partners to improve the accessibility of Europe’s cultural heritage online. Learn more about Kennisland at www.kl.nl
thanks!