csfs and kpis

Upload: enrique-ponce-de-leon

Post on 06-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Csfs and Kpis

    1/5

    WHAT ARE CSFs AND KPIs? DESCRIPTION

    CSFs and KPIs are techniques that were pioneered by D. Ronald Daniel and Jack F. Rockart. They can

    be used for defining and measuring business objectives.

    CSF is an acronym forCritical Success Factor.KPI is an acronym forKey Performance Indicator.Both of these words are widely used in the context of the design of relevant aims and measurements

    and analysis of the goal attainment of an organization.

    A CSF is some feature of the internal or external environment of an organization that has a major

    influence on achieving the organization's aims. A KPI is a quantifiable gauge that an organization uses

    to measure its performance in terms of meeting its CSFs. There can be more than 1 KPI per CSF. A KPIcan be financial or non-financial.

    It is useful to understand that at least 3 levels can be distinguished to express the aims of anyorganization:

    1. Vision/Mission. An expression of the basic reason why the organization was established and

    continues to exist. Example: Oxfam was established to relieve poverty and suffering in theworld. Compare: Strategic Intent, Shareholder Value Perspective, Stakeholder ValuePerspective.

    2. Strategic Goals. Faced with the internal and external circumstances that an organization mustdeal with in the next years: what should be the focus of the organization so that it can

    successfully pursue its Vision. Such Goals are identified by various techniques available in

    strategic analysis.. See for example: SWOT Analysis, PEST Analysis, Core Competence, ValueChain. Example: A Goal of Oxfam is to seek to provide secure livelihoods for farmers in order

    to relieve poverty.

    3. Objectives. Strategic Goals are by their very nature high level expressions, big ideas. TheseGoals must be broken down into something more concrete and specific, so that tactical plans

    can be devised (budgets), responsibilities assigned and measurements made. Therefore the

    Strategic Goals are analyzed to determine the Factors that affect their achievement. These

    Factors are the CSFs.

    Example: funding, training and education programs create secure livelihoods. Therefore funding,

    training and education are CSFs for this Goal.

  • 8/3/2019 Csfs and Kpis

    2/5

    When combined, the 3 levels form the basis of a Business Plan. In real life, things may not fall very

    neatly into 3 levels. However the implication here is that of a hierarchy of aims, from the quite vague

    and ambitious downwards towards the very concrete and measurable. The concept of CSF/KPI can be

    used throughout the hierarchy, and is the basis for often-quoted and semi-true management phrasessuch as:

    You cant manage what you cant measure.

    Things that are measured get done.

    You cant improve what you cant measure.

    ORIGIN OF CSFs AND KPIs. HISTORY

    The concept of "success factors" was originally developed by D. Ronald Daniel of McKinsey and

    Company(1) in the sixties. However the idea was most famously refined and popularized by Jack F.Rockart of the Sloan School of Management(2) at the end of the 80s.

    According to Rockart, there are 4 basic types of Critical Success Factors:

    1. Industry.

    2. Strategy.

    3. Environmental.

    4. Temporal.

    These 4 areas, of course, are one view of the strategic concerns that an organization needs deal with.Originally CSFs were devised to operate at the Business Strategy and Strategic Goals level. However,the idea of CSFs has proved so useful that its use was extended to lower levels of the organization. For

    example towards an organization's departments, even towards sections and towards individuals! The

    term: "critical" originally referred to the chance of catastrophic failure of the organization if the linkedgoals were not realized.

  • 8/3/2019 Csfs and Kpis

    3/5

    HOW MANY CSFs AND KPIs SHOULD THERE BE?

    Once there is a clarity of Vision, 3-5 strategic goals should be enough to focus the organization's

    efforts during a forthcoming 3-5 year period. However see the Balanced Scorecard technique, which

    suggests 3-5 goals per focus area. Each Goal, as we have seen, should be broken down into a number ofFactors, perhaps again 3-5, that affect the Goal. This would give, theoretically, between 9 and 25

    Factors that the organization should consider to be CSFs. There should not be too many factors (focus

    is lost and responsibility is hard to identify). Nor should there be too many factors (it may be difficultto measure and take effective action to remedy problems).

    For each CSF there must be at least one Measurement (KPI) and a Target for the current or

    forthcoming budget exercise. According to this technique, an Objective (tactical aim) is composed of a

    CSF plus a KPI plus a Target.

    Conflicts are inevitable between so many objectives. For example a cost cutting objective may be in

    conflict with a customer satisfaction objective. Hence it is important to create a balance between thevarious objectives set for each CSF/KPI combination. Thus the business plan for the organization as a

    whole is viable. This principle is called Satisficing (Herbert Simon) as opposed to Optimizing.

    There is a heavy emphasis on IT to achieve all this, since the data that are associated with the KPIsneeds to be captured and consolidated. Often the presentation of this information is done throughBusiness Intelligence software and uses some form of scorecard, dashboard, traffic light system or

    similar. It is crucial to decide when, how often and how the performance will be measured. Equally it is

    essential to create authority structures and assign organizational responsibilities that enable theObjectives to be actively managed.

    HOW DOES AN ORGANIZATION KNOW IF THE FACTORS THAT HAVE BEEN

    IDENTIFIED ARE THE RIGHT ONES?

    The simple answer is: It doesn't know! But an organization can learn - it is important to review the

    CSFs and KPIs periodically to determine whether these Factors really do drive the business, and are

    driving it in the desired direction. Targets are good servants but very bad masters. There are

    innumerable examples of this:

  • 8/3/2019 Csfs and Kpis

    4/5

    A Transportation Company didn't pick up passengers on a certain route, because then the buses

    would come too late!

    An Hotel couldn't make name badges for new personnel quickly enough. Therefore it issued

    badges that had already been made. Hence Susan had Mary on her uniform for a couple of

    weeks.

    The mindless pursuit of Targets is at best futile and at worst detrimental and demoralizing to all

    involved. However the learning process by which organization's develops a truly useful set of CSFs is

    an essential feature of a healthy and well-led organization. This required learning process can then beseen as a part of the philosophy of Pete Senges Learning Organization and the Balanced Scorecard of

    Kaplan/Norton. Both of these concepts owe a debt to the CSF/KPI idea.

    CALCULATION OF CSFs AND KPIs. FORMULA

    CSF + KPI + Target = Objective

    USAGE OF CSFs AND KPIs. APPLICATIONS

    The technique is widely used for determining in detail where to place the efforts of the organization, so

    that it achieves its Vision and Strategic Goals.

    STEPS IN THE CSFs AND KPIs. PROCESS

    1. Establish the Vision.

    2. Determine Strategic Goals.

    3. Analyze each Goal - what Factors (CSF) influence the Goal.

    4. Assign at least 1 Measure for each Factor (KPI).

    5. Assign a Target for the current budget exercise.

  • 8/3/2019 Csfs and Kpis

    5/5

    STRENGTHS OF CSFs AND KPIs. BENEFITS

    The idea of CSF/KPI has been very influential in many methods that were designed to align an

    Organization's tactical efforts with Strategy. Notably the Balanced Scorecard was based on this idea.

    LIMITATIONS OF CSFs AND KPIs. DISADVANTAGES

    Targets are good Servants but bad Masters. Existing CSFs and KPIs must be reviewed

    frequently.

    There is an emphasis on measurement. This can quickly result in forgetting or undervaluing

    major 'soft' elements, which are more difficult to measure. Compare: Scientific Management.

    It is difficult to establish the right number and types of CSF.

    The technique needs a number of cycles and considerable organizational "pain" to get it right.

    Book: Harvard Business Review, Sept.-Oct., 1961 - Management Information Crisis

    Book: Christine V. Bullen - The Rise of Managerial Computing

    Book: Peter M. Senge - Fifth Discipline

    Book: David Kaplan & Robert Norton - The Balanced Scorecard