csa 2010 comprehensive safety analysis scheduled implementation dates july 2010 through december...

18
CSA 2010 CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

Upload: alan-woods

Post on 28-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

CSA 2010CSA 2010Comprehensive Safety Analysis

Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

Page 2: CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

AGENDAAGENDA

The New DOT CSA2010 ProgramSafestat vs. CSA2010

BASIC & SMSImpact on Carriers and Drivers

DOT EnforcementYour New Score and What You Can expect

Page 3: CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

What is CSA 2010 – How is it ChangingWhat is CSA 2010 – How is it Changing

Pro-active initiative to improve efficiency and effectiveness of FMCSA’s enforcement and compliance program

Mission is to reduce CMV crashes, fatalities, and injuries

Way FMCSA assesses carrier safetyIdentifies unsafe carrier and driver behaviors that lead to crashesUses all roadside inspection including OOS / Non OOS violationsEvaluates / tracks individual driver performance

How FMCSA addresses carrier safety issuesReaches more carriers earlier and more frequentlyImproves efficiency of investigations

Focuses on specific unsafe behaviorsDefines and requires corrective actions

Page 4: CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

SAFESTAT--VS -- CSA2010SAFESTAT--VS -- CSA2010

Safe Stat vs CSA 2010Seven specific behavior evaluations (BASICS)Behavior Analysis Safety Improvement Categories

-Unsafe Driving

-Vehicle Maintenance-Improper Loading/Cargo Securement-Crash Indicator

-Controlled Substances and Alcohol-Fatigue Driving-Driver Fitness

Higher risk of audit in specific critical areas

Violations weighted based on relationship to crash risk

Employs an array of interventions instead of single optionLabor intensive compliance review

Violations are not weighted based on relationship to crash risk

Lower risk of full audit

Four broad safety evaluations Safety Evaluation Areas

-Accidents-Maintenance-Drivers-Safety Evaluation

Page 5: CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

CSA 2010Safe Stat vs

Relies heavily on the carriers to be accountable for individual driver safety problems

Holds both motor carriers and drivers responsible for safety and performance

Focuses primarily on motor carriersDirectly monitors the safety performance of individual drivers and motor carriers

Allows drivers to elude the safety program by "jumping" from one carrier to another, leaving employers unaware of the drivers' poor performance

Addresses problem drivers based on their records across multiple employers

SAFESTAT--VS -- CSA2010SAFESTAT--VS -- CSA2010

Page 6: CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

Intervention Thresholds Under CSA 2010Intervention Thresholds Under CSA 2010

*** Remember that Unsafe Driving and Fatigued driving are referred to as the stand alone “BASICs” ***

Basic Passanger Haz Mat OtherUnsafe Driving~Fatigued Driving~Crash Indicator 50% 67% 72%

Driver Fitness~Drugs/Alcohol~Vehicle Maintenance~Cargo Related 50% 72% 77%

Page 7: CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

•Any OOS violation will add two points to the severity weight

•Each inspection has a max of 30 severity weight points

•If duplicate or like violations are found they will only be counted once per inspection (OOS violations will take precedence)

•No violations discovered will offset

•Crash severity weights

•Tow-away but no injuries or fatalities = 1

•Injuries or fatalities = 2

•Tow-away with hazmat release = 2

•Injury or fatality with hazmat release = 3

Keys to the MethodologyKeys to the Methodology

Page 8: CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

Keys to the MethodologyKeys to the Methodology• All severity weights are multiplied by a time weight of 1, 2, or 3

•Carriers• Violations 6 months or less x3• Violations 6-12 months x 2• Violations 12-24 months x1

•Drivers•Violations 12 months or less x3•Violations 12-24 months x2•Violations 24-36 months x1

•Carrier peer groups are broken into five categories•1-5•6-15•16-50•51-500•More than 500

Page 9: CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

CSA2010 Key ComponentsCSA2010 Key Components• Safety Measurement System (SMS)

• All crash records and ALL roadside inspection violations• Weights time and severity of violations based on crash risk•Triggers the intervention process•Safety Performance based on the 7 Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories (BASICs)

•Safety Fitness Determination (SFD)• Tied to current safety performance

• Not limited to acute/critical violations from a compliance review

• Intervention Process• Array of interventions instead of the labor-intensive comp. review

•Offsite Investigations•Onsite Focused Investigations•Onsite Comprehensive Investigations

Page 10: CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

BASICs Unsafe DrivingBASICs Unsafe DrivingStand Alone basic – meaning that carrier deemed to be “failing” on the unsafe driving orfatigued driving BASIC alone may receive an overall failing grade as a company.**************************************************************************************************

Unsafe Driving defined – driving a commercial vehicle in a dangerous or careless manner speeding, reckless driving, inattention, improper lane change, using a radardetector, operating a unsafely, smoking within 25’ of hazmat vehicle.

FMCSR parts covered under unsafe driving – 177, 392, 397, 398

Factors affecting carrier measure – violation severity, violation age, average power units

Factors affecting driver measure – violation severity, violation age

Violation with highest severity – Reckless Driving

Page 11: CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

BASICs Fatigued DrivingBASICs Fatigued DrivingStand Alone basic – meaning that carrier deemed to be “failing” on the unsafe driving or fatigued driving BASIC alone may receive an overall failing grade as a company

*************************************************************************************************Fatigued Driving – operation of a commercial vehicle by drivers who are ill, fatigued, or in violation of the hours-of-service (HOS) regulations. Examples such as; failingto complete or retain logs, violating the hours of service limits, ailing to include all required items on the log, violating an HOS-related out-of-service order.

FMCSR parts covered under unsafe driving – 392, 395

Factors affecting carrier measure – violation severity, violation age, number and ageof inspections, whether violation resulted in OOS order.

Factors affecting driver measure – violation severity, violation age, whether violationresulted in OOS order.

Violation with highest severity – Driving while ill/fatigued, jumping OOS order

Page 12: CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

BASICs Drugs & AlcoholBASICs Drugs & Alcohol

Drugs & Alcohol – driving a CMV while impaired by drugs or alcohol such as; violating an out-of-service order relating to alcohol under 392.5 (a) or (b), using orbeing in possession of drugs, possessing, using, or being under the influence ofalcohol for hours prior to being on duty.

FMCSR parts covered under drugs & alcohol – 392

Factors affecting carrier measure – violation severity, violation age, average powerunits

Factors affecting driver measure – violation severity, violation age

Violation with highest severity – Drug use/possession; jumping OOS order

Page 13: CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

BASICs Driver FitnessBASICs Driver Fitness

Driver Fitness – the operation of CMVs by drivers who are unfit to drive due toLack of training, experience, or medical qualifications such as, driving without a CDL, Driving while disqualified, no medical card, failing to train hazmat employees, failingTo notify employer of convictions, failing to have proper endorsements.

FMCSR parts covered under driver fitness – 172, 177, 383, 386, 391, 398

Factors affecting carrier measure – violation severity, violation age, number and ageof inspections, whether violation resulted in OOS.

Factors affecting driver measure – violation severity, violation age, whether violation resulted in OOS.

Violation with highest severity – multiple licenses, jumping OOS order

Page 14: CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

BASICs Vehicle MaintenanceBASICs Vehicle Maintenance

Vehicle Maintenance – CMV failure due to improper or inadequate maintenanceSuch as; loose wheel fasteners, defective brakes or lights, no DVIR, failure to makeRequired repairs, failure to inspect the vehicle or prepare inspection reports, Inadequate conspicuity treatments, operating an OOS vehicle.

FMCSR parts covered under vehicle maintenance – 365, 375, 385, 392, 393,396, 398, 399

Factors affecting carrier measure – violation severity, violation age, number and ageof inspections, whether violation resulted in OOS.

Factors affecting driver measure – violation severity, violation age, number andage of inspections, whether violation resulted in OOS.

Violation with highest severity – tires, suspension, lighting, jumping OOS order

Page 15: CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

BASICs Cargo Loading/SecurementBASICs Cargo Loading/Securement

Cargo loading/securement – CMV incident resulting from shifting loads, spilled or dropped cargo, or unsafe handling of hazardous materials such as; improper loadsecurement, improper cargo retention, improper hazardous materials handling, use of insufficient or damaged tie downs, hazmat routing violations, and size andweight.

FMCSR parts covered under cargo loading/securement – 171, 172, 173, 177, 178, 180,385, 392, 393, 397

Factors affecting carrier measure – violation severity, violation age, number and ageof inspections, whether violation resulted in OOS.

Factors affecting driver measure – violation severity, violation age, number andage of inspections, whether violation resulted in OOS.

Violation with highest severity – tires, suspension, lighting, jumping OOS order

Page 16: CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

BASICs Crash HistoryBASICs Crash History

Crash history – histories or patterns of high crash involvement, including frequencyand severity such as fatalities, injuries, or vehicles being towed form the scene.

FMCSR parts covered under crash history – none

Factors affecting carrier measure – whether crash involved injury, fatality, tow-awayor hazmat release; age of crash; aver number of power units

Factors affecting driver measure – whether crash involved injury, fatality, tow-awayor hazmat release; age of crash

Violation with highest severity – N/A

Page 17: CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

How to Prepare!How to Prepare!-Safestat log in (special pin number) – if you don’t have or know what you pin number is request a pin number (www.fmcsa.dot.gov/registration-licensing/online-registration/onlineregdescription)

-Update your MCS150 form on line for accuracy in reporting (required to be updated at least every two years) accurate data will be extremely important

- Review carrier profile and safety record over past two years and compare violations against the BASIC’s. Beginfocusing on the problem areas.

- Educate drivers on CSA2010 and how their behavior and performance can affect the company and their own safety performace

Page 18: CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010

Available SourcesAvailable Sources

-www.vigillo.com - CSA 2010 Scorecard currently available

-www.jjkeller.com -CSA 2010 CD will be available this summer for purchase-CSA 2010 Manual currently available

-www.fmcsa.dot.gov-Up to date information on progress of CSA 2010