critique of - university of oregoncritique of relational aesthetics if the work of art consists in...

27

Upload: others

Post on 09-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are
Page 2: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

Critique of Relational Aesthetics

Claire Bishop

Page 3: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

Critique of Relational Aesthetics

If human relations is the work of art, then how do we measure or compare these relationships?

Claire Bishop

Page 4: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

Critique of Relational Aesthetics

If the work of art consists in theact of participation itself—the taking of the candy—thenhow exactly are we to evaluatethe aesthetic success or failureof a pile of candy in a gallery?By the degree of participation?The more candy taken from thepile, the better the art?

Felix Gonzales-Torres, Untitled (Portrait of Ross in LA), 1991

Page 5: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

Critique of Relational Aesthetics

If relational art produces human relations, then the next logical question to ask is what types of relations are being produced, for whom, and why?

Claire Bishop

Page 6: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

According to Bourriaud the structure ofrelational work facilitates a social relationship,though Bishop suggests we look at such socialrelationships through a critical lens which canbe specifically related to the construction ofsuch relations and the development of a‘public’ instead of ‘community.’

Critique of Relational Aesthetics

Rikrit Tiravanija, Untitled (Free)

Page 7: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

According to Bourriaud the structure ofrelational work facilitates a social relationship,though Bishop suggests we look at such socialrelationships through a critical lens which canbe specifically related to the construction ofsuch relations and the development of a‘public’ instead of ‘community.’

Critique of Relational Aesthetics

Rikrit Tiravanija, Untitled (Free)

A collective that is formed by constructed relationships, which generates common connection amongst people (microtopia)

A collective that is organically formed by situational randomness, shared values, and political antagonism

Page 8: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

“Given the absence of any aesthetic criteria for evaluating relational art, a competing theory which champions aesthetic strategies of dissonance, subversion, disruption, is Relational Antagonism.”

Relational Antagonism

Claire Bishop

Page 9: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

Santiago Sierra250 Cm Line Tattooed On 6 Paid People, 1999

Page 10: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

Santiago Sierra250 Cm Line Tattooed On 6 Paid People, 1999

Page 11: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

Santiago Sierra8 People Paid To Be In Cardboard Boxes,1998

Page 12: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

Santiago SierraSix People Who Are not Allowed to Be Paid for Sitting in Cardboard Boxes 2000

Page 13: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

Santiago SierraSix People Who Are not Allowed to Be Paid for Sitting in Cardboard Boxes 2000

Page 14: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

“In contrast to Tiravanija’s happy soup kitchen, Sierra is there to offer the sobering reminder that there’s no such thing as a free meal: everything and everyone has a price.”

Rikrit Tiravanija, Untitled (Free)Santiago Sierra, 250 Cm Line Tattooed On 6 Paid People

Page 15: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

What is the ethical value of aesthetic antagonism?

Critique of Relational Antagonism

Santiago Sierra8 People Paid To Be In Cardboard Boxes,

1998

Page 16: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

What is the ethical value of aesthetic antagonism?

Critique of Relational Antagonism

How we distinguish the aesthetic object from the object critiqued?

Santiago Sierra8 People Paid To Be In Cardboard Boxes,

1998

Page 17: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

“Sierra’s work is not symbolic, it is not simply about oppression, it is oppressive itself. Again, that hypothetical defender of Sierra may say that his work does this in order not to excuse itself from the cruelties of the labor market. But why recapitulate something in order to say it is wrong? Furthermore, why simply stop at saying it is wrong, something any moral midget can do, and instead not try to help transform those social relations?”

-John Menick

Critique of Relational Antagonism

Page 18: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

Critique of Relational Antagonism

Relational Antagonism does not believe in change. Its negative and reactionary gesture perpetuates a sociopolitical impotence. Santiago Sierra

Six People Who Are not Allowed to Be Paid for Sitting in Cardboard Boxes

2000

“…that’s the way the world is!”

Page 19: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

“Today’s critical art only consists in manifestations of agonism and refusal… It dismisses the importance of proposing new modes of coexistence, of contributing to the construction of new forms of collective identity.”

-Chantal Mouffe

Critique of Relational Antagonism

Page 20: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

- Authorship

- Activation

- Community

- Political Discourse

- Structural alternatives

Socially-Engaged Art

Page 21: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

Rick Lowe

Page 22: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

Jon Rubin and Dawn Weleski, Conflict Kitchen., Ongoing Project

Page 23: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

Jon Rubin and Dawn Weleski, Conflict Kitchen., Ongoing Project

Page 24: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

Jon Rubin and Dawn Weleski, Conflict Kitchen., Ongoing Project

Page 25: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

Amar Bakshi, The Portals., Ongoing Project

Page 27: Critique of - University of OregonCritique of Relational Aesthetics If the work of art consists in the act of participation itself— the taking of the candy—then how exactly are

www.artcityeugene.com