crit vis analysis

61

Upload: webtel125

Post on 13-Apr-2017

539 views

Category:

Art & Photos


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 2: Crit Vis Analysis

Getting Started

• pose a series of questions to students, such as:

– what is literacy?– what does it mean to be literate?– what is visual literacy?

– how has literacy changed with digital technologies, like the computer and the web?

– how do you go about assessing whether or not an image is “true” or “real?”

Page 3: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 4: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 5: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 6: Crit Vis Analysis

ORIGINAL

Copyright 1970 Valley Daily News

ALTERED

1995Life Magazine

Page 7: Crit Vis Analysis

Life Magazine responds:

The photo we published was supplied to us by our photo library—the Time-Life Picture Collection, the second largest such repository of catalogued images. Amazingly, the fence post had been airbrushed out by someone, now anonymous, in a darkroom sometime in the early 1970s. The picture had run numerous times—without the fencepost, and without anyone taking notice—in Time (Nov. 6, 1972, p. 23), People (May 2, 1977, p. 37), Time (Jan. 7, 1980, p. 45), People (April 30, 1990, p. 117), to name just a few publications.

Page 8: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 9: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 10: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 11: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 12: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 13: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 14: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 15: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 16: Crit Vis Analysis

Newsweek’s policy on altering tones but not subject matter was printed in the December 8, 1997 edition of Newsweek as a “clarification” after the controversy over the magazine's digital straightening of the teeth of Bobbi McCaughey.

Newsweek’s full statement read as follows: “In an attempt to lighten shadows on last week’s cover photograph of Mr. and Mrs. Kenny McCaughey, our photo technicians altered the appearance of Bobbi McCaughey’s teeth. While we often correct color values and contrast levels in pictures we use, it is not Newsweek’s policy to change or misrepresent the subject matter in any way. We regret the error.”

Page 17: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 18: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 19: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 20: Crit Vis Analysis

“The harshness of the mug shot—the merciless bright light, the stubble on Simpson's face, the cold specificity of the picture—had been subtly smoothed and shaped into an icon of tragedy” (Managing Editor,Time).

Page 21: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 22: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 23: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 24: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 25: Crit Vis Analysis

[Cindy Crawford in Elle, 1998]

Page 26: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 27: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 28: Crit Vis Analysis

left armand pants(photo 3)

right arm(photo 1)

face(photo 2)

torso and shirt(digitally created)

hair(digitally created)

“It's 100% her.”(Redbook editor Ellen Kunes)

Page 29: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 30: Crit Vis Analysis

+

=2002 1999

July 2003

Page 31: Crit Vis Analysis

homepage.mac.com/gapodaca/digital/digital.html

Page 32: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 33: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 34: Crit Vis Analysis

“She started out a big kitty and she just seemed to keep growing. She always meowed for more food and would climb up on the counter to eat food which I forgot to cover. Chicken is her favorite. Once I left a cooked chicken on the table that I was going to use for a boat picnic, an hour later the chicken was gone” (email text; readership: hundreds of thousands).

“My daughter wanted to send an electronic photo of her cat to her friend. I got a little carried away. When we sent it to her friend, we never dreamed anyone would believe the photo was real” (Cordell Hauglie, Ottawa Citizen, readership: thousands).

Page 35: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 36: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 37: Crit Vis Analysis

background

sky

glacier 1

glacier 2

Page 38: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 39: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 40: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 41: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 42: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 43: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 44: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 45: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 46: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 47: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 48: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 49: Crit Vis Analysis

The spoof version appears to have originated on IMAO.us, a political humor blog, where it was posted on March 4, 2008 under the header, “There Is an International Crisis at 3 A.M.; President Obama Answers the Call.” Both the title and the Photoshopped clock on the wall refer to a scenario posed in a TV campaign ad released by Obama’s rival, Hillary Clinton, in late February:

It’s 3 a.m. and your children are safe and asleep. But there’s a phone in the White House and it’s ringing. Something's happening in the world. Your vote will decide who answers that call. Whether it’s someone who already knows the world’s leaders, knows the military—someone tested and ready to lead in a dangerous world. It’s 3 a.m. and your children are safe and asleep. Who do you want answering the phone?

It could also be regarded as an homage (or a rip-off) of a similar visual joke targeting George W. Bush that circulated in 2005:

Page 50: Crit Vis Analysis

• portion of the date in the putative newspaper clipping is (deliberately) obscured

• article in question supposedly comes from an edition of the San Francisco Chronicle published on a Sunday, July 17, sometime in the 1980s

• only twice in the 1980s did July 17 fall on a Sunday, in 1983 and 1988

• 1983 date is ruled out because the article refers to “congressman John Kerry,” but Kerry wasn't first elected to Congress until 1984

• 1988 date is ruled out because search reveals no such article

Page 51: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 53: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 54: Crit Vis Analysis

• Tampa Bay musician and graphic designer sent a Photoshopped shot showing Obama dancing with Sarah Palin to three friends, with the caption: “Unfortunately, this is what the country wants”

• within 5 days, the picture ended up all over the world, including distribution via ABC news and CNN and via hundreds of blogs

Page 55: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 56: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 57: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 58: Crit Vis Analysis

“It is important that we show the diversity in the University of Idaho,” graphic artist David Embleton told Buchanan.

But if the campus were so diverse, wouldn’t the archives have real, unadulterated photographs to reflect the teeming racial variety on campus?

According to the Princeton Review, at least 81% of the student body at UI is white, while 1% is black and 2% is Asian.

“Doctored Diversity”http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=9944

Page 59: Crit Vis Analysis
Page 60: Crit Vis Analysis

A Few Ways to Conclude…

• returning to the discussion about what literacy is

• discussing the effects of image manipulation

• having students create a list of recommendations for people trying to decide if an image is real or not

Page 61: Crit Vis Analysis

all of the materials from today are available for download at:

www.digitalwriting.org/TE407.zip

you can email me at:

[email protected]